Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed 0 50000 100000 150000 200000...

36
Application Application Filings Filings and and Examiner Examiner Production Production
  • date post

    18-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    222
  • download

    4

Transcript of Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed 0 50000 100000 150000 200000...

Application FilingsApplication Filingsandand

Examiner Production Examiner Production

UPR Applications FiledUPR Applications Filed

0

50000

100000150000

200000

250000

300000350000

400000

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

FY 05 plan 375,080 (5.5% above FY 04)

FY 05 actual 384,228 (8.1% above FY04)

2.6% over plan

22

ProductionProduction

1 “UPR” = Utility, Plant, and Reissue Applications.2 “FAOM” = First Action on the Merits – first action count by an examiner after the filing of an application (does not include

restrictions or other miscellaneous actions).3 “Disposal” = An examiner allowance, abandonment, or disposals following a board decision.4 “Production Unit” = First action count plus disposal count divided by 2.5 “PCT” = Patent Cooperation Treaty. PCT applications are processed differently and tracked separately from US National stage

applications. For FY 05, 15,147 PU’s is 35,389 processed applications.

22,916

296,535

295,456

297,614

FY 05 Target

288,316287,752UPR Production Units4

15,147

279,345

297,287

FY 05

16,882PCT Production Units5

FY 04

288,315UPR1 FAOM2

287,188UPR Disposals3

33

. . . vs the Backlog . . . vs the Backlog

PENDENCYPENDENCY

First Action Pendency First Action Pendency by Art Areasby Art Areas

30.9

52.1

24.3

50.4

39.7

30.8

27.7

Pendency1

(months)

3723 – Tools & Metal Working

3612 – Land Vehicles

2833 – Electrical Connectors

2651 – Dynamic Information Storage & Retrieval

2125 – Manufacturing Control Systems and Chemical/ Mechanical/Electrical Control

1752 – Radiation Imagery

1620 – Heterocyclic Compounds and Uses

Low Pendency Art Areas

10.9

12.0

8.8

16.1

20.0

12.1

16.9

Pendency1

(months)

3731 – Surgery: Cutting, Clamping, Suturing

3628 – Finance & Banking, Accounting

2836 – Control Circuits

2617 – Interactive Video Distribution

2123 – Simulation and Modeling, Emulation of Computer Components

1743 – Analytic Chemistry & Wave Energy

1640 – Immunology, Receptor/ Ligands, Cytokines, Recombinant Hormones, and Molecular Biology

High Pendency Art Areas

1 “Average 1st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during

October-December 2005. 55

Inventory by Art ExamplesInventory by Art Examples

38-47

25-130

22

111

46

34

38-51

Months of Inventory*

3742 – Thermal and Combustion Technology

3651 – Conveying

2831 – Electrical Conductors

2651, 2653 – Information Storage and Retrieval

2125 – Manufacturing Control Systems and Chemical/ Mechanical/Electrical Control

1734 – Adhesive Bonding and Coating Apparatus

1620 – Organic Chemistry

Low Inventory Art Areas

8

12

8

12

10

10

15

Months of Inventory*

3731 and 3737 – Medical Instruments, Diagnostic Equipment

3620 – Business Methods

2836 – Control Circuits

2611 – Interactive Video Distribution

2127 – Computer Task Management

1753 – Radiation Imagery

1614, 1615, and 1617 – Drugs, Bio-affecting and Body Treatment

High Inventory Art Areas

*The number of months it would take to reach a first action on the merits (e.g., an action addressing patentability issues) on a new application filed in July 2005 at today’s production rate. Today’s production rate means that there are no changes in production due to hiring, attrition, changes to examination processing or examination efficiencies, and that applications are taken up in the order of filing in the given art unit/area. Of course, USPTO is taking aggressive steps to ensure changes that will significantly lower the inventory rates in high-inventory art areas.

66

TC Application InventoryTC Application Inventory

1 “New Application inventory” is the number of new applications designated or assigned to a technology center awaiting a first action.

2 “Overall Pending Application inventory” is the total number of applications designated or assigned to a technology center in an active status. Includes new applications; rejected awaiting response; amended; under appeal or interference; suspended; reexams and allowed applications awaiting grant publication.

*Total inventory includes applications not assigned to a particular TC, awaiting processing either pre- or post-examination.

27,599809,323108,039101,097137,458138,822102,440105,44795,006Overall Pending Applications2

9/30/2004

18,451508,87865,00556,73877,65197,38071,77863,92355,402New Applications1 9/30/2004

38,104932,300130,168117,045159,687167,721117,728120,767107,647Overall Pending Applications2

9/30/2005

24,534586,58083,22570,35494,425115,58576,52972,69762,644New Applications1

9/30/2005

3700 Total* Design360028002600210017001600

77

Patent QualityPatent Quality(Shared Responsibility)(Shared Responsibility)

Quality of Products – FY 05Quality of Products – FY 05

*Compliance and error rates as measured by OPQA. *Compliance and error rates as measured by OPQA. 1Compliance is the percent of office actions reviewed and found to be free of any in-process examination deficiency (an error that has significant adverse impact on patent prosecution).

2Patent allowance error rate is the percent of allowed applications reviewed having at least one claim which is considered unpatentable on a basis for which a court would hold a patent invalid. “Allowance” occurs before a patent is issued, so these errors are caught before any patent is actually granted.

5.32%

82.0%

FY 04

Fiscal Year 2005

4.55%

86.2%

FY 05

4.0%

84.0%

FY 05 Target

1.6%6.43%4.94%4.43%2.25%3.56%6.46%4.88%Patent

Allowance Error Rate2*

94.3%86.6%84.4%90.9%84.7%88.1%82.9%81.7%

Patent In-Process

Examination Compliance

Rate1*

3700 Design2600 2800 3600210017001600

99

Re-WorkRe-Work

Technology Centers Technology Centers Rework* StatisticsRework* Statistics

* Rework first actions are those actions that are in a Continuing (CONs and CIPs), RCE, CPA or 129(a) applications (excludes Divisionals).

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005TC

Summary% FAOM Rework

% FAOM Rework

% FAOM Rework

% FAOM Rework

1600 36.4% 39.7% 40.3% 42.4%1700 25.2% 26.9% 27.1% 28.0%2100 23.9% 24.0% 24.6% 28.2%2600 24.8% 24.2% 24.3% 25.4%2800 19.1% 22.0% 24.9% 24.1%3600 17.7% 21.2% 23.2% 28.5%3700 22.2% 25.1% 24.0% 28.1%

UPR 23.2% 25.3% 26.1% 28.3%

1111

Hiring and RetentionHiring and Retention

Hires and AttritionsHires and Attritions

1600 1700 2100 2600 2800 3600 3700 Corps Design

FY 04 Hires 75 35 115 116 31 26 45 443 15

FY 04 Attritions 30 26 58 82 58 43 39 336 4

FY 05 BOY Examiner Staff

417 440 563 658 742 422 439 3681 72

FY 05 Hiring 101 58 225 169 184 91 131 959 19

FY 05 Attrits 42 39 93 92 54 55 50 425 10

FY 06 Hiring Goal 75 35 256 256 178 100 100 1000 20

FY 06 hires (1/25/06) 30 19 75 62 40 22 21 269 0

FY05 Hires as a Percent of Examiner Staffing in the TC

24% 13% 40% 26% 25% 22% 30% 26% 26%

1313

Markush PracticeMarkush Practice

1.1. A cell adhesion protein of formula (1), A cell adhesion protein of formula (1),

A-(B)-(C)-(D)A-(B)-(C)-(D)nn-E-E

or a pharmaceutically acceptable or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative thereof , wherein . . .derivative thereof , wherein . . .

Markush PracticeMarkush Practice

1515

1616

1717

1818

1919

2020

ProductionProduction

We Can Not Hire Our Way Out !!!We Can Not Hire Our Way Out !!!

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

550,000

600,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Without Strategic Plan 1,000 Hires & Lower Attrition Rate Plus Claims & Continuation Limits Plus Patentability ReportsHistoric

Production

22

Contact InformationContact Information

John Doll

Commissioner for Patents

e-mail: [email protected]

Phone: 571 272 8250

2323

John Doll – Commissioner for PatentsJohn Doll – Commissioner for Patents

February 1, 2006February 1, 2006

Pendency ProjectionsPendency Projections

Pendency Using FY 2005 Actual Filings at 8.1%

50

Pendency Using FY 2005 Actual Filings at 8.1%

51

Pendency Using FY 2005 Actual Filings at 8.1%

52

Pendency Using FY 2005 Actual Filings at 8.1%

53

Pendency Using FY 2005 Actual Filings at 8.1%

54

Stats and StuffStats and Stuff

Total Continuation Filing RatesTotal Continuation Filing Rates

*Straight Continuations 37 CFR *Straight Continuations 37 CFR §§1.53 (b)(1) – No Divisionals or CIPs – as of 1/17/061.53 (b)(1) – No Divisionals or CIPs – as of 1/17/06

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

1 CPA/RCE 1 Con 2 or more CPA/RCE 2 or more Cons*

5656

Distribution of Distribution of Independent Claims at FilingIndependent Claims at Filing

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%1

2~3

4~6

7~10

11~2

0

21+

FY 2004 FY 2005

5757

Distribution of Distribution of Total Claims at FilingTotal Claims at Filing

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%1~

10

11~2

0

21~2

5

26~3

0

31~4

0

41~5

0

51~6

0

61~1

00

101+

FY 2004 FY 20055858

Total Claims at Filing and IssueTotal Claims at Filing and Issue

FY 1990 FY 1999 FY 20050

3,000,000

6,000,000

9,000,000

0

8

16

24

Claims Filed Claims Issued Average Claims Filed

5959

Distribution of the Number of Distribution of the Number of References Cited in ApplicationsReferences Cited in Applications

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,0003,500N

one

1~3

4~5

6~10

11~2

0

21~3

0

31~4

0

>40

Sampling done April-June 2005Sampling done April-June 2005

6060