Appendix B Section VII – eGrid Generation, PV Generation...
46
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–0 Appendix B Section VII – eGrid Generation, PV Generation, and Emission Offset Profiles for Select Years Figure BVII - 1. NEWE – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 2 Figure BVII - 2. NYAS – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity............................. 3 Figure BVII - 3. MAAC – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 4 Figure BVII - 4. ECOV – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 5 Figure BVII - 5. ECMI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................. 6 Figure BVII - 6. SRVC –1998 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity.............................. 7 Figure BVII - 7. SRTV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .............................. 8 Figure BVII - 8. SRSO – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 9 Figure BVII - 9. SRMV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity............................. 10 Figure BVII - 10. FRCC – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................... 11 Figure BVII - 11. MANN – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ......................... 12 Figure BVII - 12. MANS – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity........................... 13 Figure BVII - 13. SPNO – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................... 14 Figure BVII - 14. SPSO – 2000 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................... 15 Figure BVII - 15. ERCT – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .......................... 16 Figure BVII - 16. MAPP – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .......................... 17 Figure BVII - 17. ROCK – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ......................... 18 Figure BVII - 18. NWGB – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity......................... 19 Figure BVII - 19. NWPN – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ......................... 20 Figure BVII - 20. WSSW – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................ 21 Figure BVII - 21. CALI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................... 22
Transcript of Appendix B Section VII – eGrid Generation, PV Generation...
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–0
Appendix B Section VII – eGrid Generation, PV Generation, andEmission Offset Profiles for Select Years
Figure BVII - 1. NEWE – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity............................ 2Figure BVII - 2. NYAS – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity............................. 3Figure BVII - 3. MAAC – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 4Figure BVII - 4. ECOV – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 5Figure BVII - 5. ECMI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................. 6Figure BVII - 6. SRVC –1998 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity.............................. 7Figure BVII - 7. SRTV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .............................. 8Figure BVII - 8. SRSO – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ............................ 9Figure BVII - 9. SRMV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity.............................10Figure BVII - 10. FRCC – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ...........................11Figure BVII - 11. MANN – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .........................12Figure BVII - 12. MANS – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity...........................13Figure BVII - 13. SPNO – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ...........................14Figure BVII - 14. SPSO – 2000 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ...........................15Figure BVII - 15. ERCT – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ..........................16Figure BVII - 16. MAPP – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity..........................17Figure BVII - 17. ROCK – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity .........................18Figure BVII - 18. NWGB – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity.........................19Figure BVII - 19. NWPN – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity.........................20Figure BVII - 20. WSSW – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity ........................21Figure BVII - 21. CALI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity...........................22
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–1
Fossil PV SO267 TWh 95 MWh 19414 GW 76 kW 2.0
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
eGrid Fossil Generation, PV Generation, andEmission Offset Profiles
Contour plots show total eGrid fossil generation, PVGeneration, and load shape following emission offsets forSO2, NOx, and CO2. The avoided emissions from PV (or theemission offsets) are a multiple of the load shape followingemission rates (kg/MWh) and the total PV generation in thesubregion per monitored PV capacity (kWh/kW). The resultis the emissions avoided by the PV generation permonitored PV capacity (g/kW).
Below the contour plot is a chart that displays the totaleGrid generation in TWh and the maximum hourlygeneration in GW. The eGrid generation is normalized to itspeak hour. The chart also shows the total (MWh) andmaximum hourly (kW) PV generation. The PV generationcontours are normalized to the hourly monitored capacity.This takes in to account PV systems in the subregion thatbreak or are installed during the year. The chart shows totalavoided emissions in kg for the year for each emission andthe average avoided emissions per MWh of PV generation.
All plots are for 2002. Simulated PV generation is shown forsubregions where actual PV system data were not available.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–2
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO267 TWh 95 MWh 194 73 71,70014 GW 76 kW 2.0 0.7 743
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 1. NEWE – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for NEWE (New England) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total andpeak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and averageoffsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityNEWE (New England) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–3
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 2. NYAS – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for NYAS (New York) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityNYAS (New York) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO266 TWh 34 MWh 84 29 24,40018 GW 78 kW 2.3 0.9 721
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–4
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 3. MAAC – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for MAAC (Mid-Atlantic) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2178 TWh 144 MWh 651 185 105,70039 GW 152 kW 4.5 1.3 743
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityMAAC (Mid-Atlantic) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–5
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 4. ECOV – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for ECOV (Mid-Atlantic) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2441 TWh 30 MWh 162 65 24,10076 GW 25 kW 5.5 2.2 798
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityECOV (Ohio Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–6
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO271 TWh 29 MWh 96 49 24,10015 GW 30 kW 3.5 1.8 856
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 5. ECMI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for ECMI (Michigan) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityECMI (Michigan) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–7
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2160 TWh 2.7 MWh 14 5 2,50042 GW 2.9 kW 5.4 2.0 905
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 6. SRVC –1998 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) in 1998. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total andpeak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and averageoffsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission. SEPA PV is data not available after 1998.
1998 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–8
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2105 TWh 2.6 MWh 11 6 2,50018 GW 1.8 kW 4.4 2.1 966
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 7. SRTV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SRTV (Tennessee Valley) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total andpeak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and averageoffsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySRTV (Tennessee Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–9
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2191 TWh 17 MWh 69 33 15,50037 GW 16 kW 3.6 1.7 791
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 8. SRSO – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SRSO (Southeast) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySRSO (Southeast) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–10
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2107 TWh 2.7 MWh 2 4 2,00022 GW 1.8 kW 0.9 1.6 763
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 9. SRMV – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SRMV (Mississippi Valley) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual totaland peak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets andaverage offsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySRMV (Mississippi Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–11
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2137 TWh 2.6 MWh 6 4 1,90028 GW 1.5 kW 2.4 1.7 754
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 10. FRCC – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for FRCC (Florida) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityFRCC (Florida) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–12
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO244 TWh 52 MWh 152 94 41,2009 GW 45 kW 3.1 1.9 814
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 11. MANN – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for MANN (Wisconsin) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityMANN (Wisconsin) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–13
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2136 TWh 2.8 MWh 8 6 2,30028 GW 1.8 kW 3.0 2.2 827
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 12. MANS – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for MANS (Illinois) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityMANS (Illinois) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–14
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO256 TWh 3.3 MWh 9 6 3,00010 GW 1.8 kW 2.7 1.9 913
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 13. SPNO – 2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SPNO (Kansas) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySPNO (Kansas) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–15
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2125 TWh 2.4 MWh 9 18 8,30024 GW 8.0 kW 0.8 1.4 666
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 14. SPSO – 2000 Fossil Load, Simulated PV, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for SPSO (Oklahoma) in 2000. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. SEPA PV data is not available after 2000.
2000 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacitySPSO (Oklahoma) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–16
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2208 TWh 117 MWh 86 127 77,60042 GW 99 kW 0.8 1.1 676
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 15. ERCT – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for ERCT (Texas) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityERCT (Texas) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–17
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityMAPP (Northern Plains) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO2162 TWh 5.7 MWh 14 10 5,10024 GW 4.7 kW 2.4 1.8 911
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 16. MAPP – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for MAPP (Northern Plains) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total andpeak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and averageoffsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–18
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO253 TWh 3.3 MWh 5 5 2,9008 GW 2.1 kW 1.5 1.6 853
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 17. ROCK – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for ROCK (Colorado) in 2001. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. SEPA PV data is not available after 2001.
2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityROCK (Colorado) – (365 days x 24 hours)
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–19
2002 Fossil Load, Simulated PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityNWGB (Great Basin) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO245 TWh 3.3 MWh 4 5 2,6007 GW 1.8 kW 1.1 1.5 808
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 18. NWGB – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for NWGB (Great Basin) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. PV data is simulated.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–20
2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityNWPN (Pacific Northwest) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO236 TWh 1.0 MWh 2 2 9006 GW 2.3 kW 2.2 1.5 905
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 19. NWPN – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for NWPN (Pacific Northwest) in 2001. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak.Offsets are per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total andpeak generation are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and averageoffsets per MWh of PV generation for each emission. SEPA PV data is not available after 2001.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–21
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO290 TWh 71 MWh 68 110 55,00015 GW 80 kW 0.9 1.5 761
2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityWSSW (Southwest) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 20. WSSW – 2001 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for WSSW (Southwest) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsetsare per monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission. SEPA data is most complete for 2001.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVII–22
Fossil PV SO2 NOx CO275 TWh 124 MWh 12 48 71,70022 GW 114 kW 0.1 0.4 581
2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV CapacityCALI (California) – (365 days x 24 hours)
Total (kg)Ave (kg/MWh)
Figure BVII - 21. CALI – 2002 Fossil Load, PV Generation, and Offsets per Monitored PV Capacity
All contour plots are for CALI (California) in 2002. eGrid fossil load is normalized to its 2002 peak. Offsets areper monitored PV capacity in the hour and for load shape following generation. Annual total and peakgeneration are noted for eGrid fossil and PV generation, as are total emission offsets and average offsets perMWh of PV generation for each emission.
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–1
Appendix B Section VIII – Monthly Simulated PV Generation, EmissionsRates, and Offsets by Fuel Class
Figure BVIII - 1 Emission Offsets by Month, NEWE (New England) in 2002............................................................. 2Figure BVIII - 2 Emission Offsets by Month, NYAS (New York) in 2002 .................................................................. 3Figure BVIII - 3 Emission Offsets by Month, MAAC (Mid-Atlantic) in 2002............................................................... 4Figure BVIII - 4 Emission Offsets by Month, ECOV (Ohio Valley) in 2002................................................................ 5Figure BVIII - 5 Emission Offsets by Month, ECMI (Michigan) in 2002.................................................................... 6Figure BVIII - 6 Emission Offsets by Month, SRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) in 2002....................................................... 7Figure BVIII - 7 Emission Offsets by Month, SRTV (Tennessee Valley) in 2002........................................................ 8Figure BVIII - 8 Emission Offsets by Month, SRSO (Southeast) in 2002 ................................................................. 9Figure BVIII - 9 Emission Offsets by Month, SRMV (Mississippi Valley) in 2002 ......................................................10Figure BVIII - 10 Emission Offsets by Month, FRCC (Florida) in 2002....................................................................11Figure BVIII - 11 Emission Offsets by Month, MANN (Wisconsin) in 2002 ..............................................................12Figure BVIII - 12 Emission Offsets by Month, MANS (Illinois) in 2002 ...................................................................13Figure BVIII - 13 Emission Offsets by Month, SPNO (Kansas) in 2002...................................................................14Figure BVIII - 14 Emission Offsets by Month, SPSO (Oklahoma) in 2002...............................................................15Figure BVIII - 15 Emission Offsets by Month, ERCT (Texas) in 2002 .....................................................................16Figure BVIII - 16 Emission Offsets by Month, MAPP (Great Plains) in 2001 ............................................................17Figure BVIII - 17 Emission Offsets by Month, ROCK (Colorado) in 2002 ................................................................18Figure BVIII - 18 Emission Offsets by Month, NWGB (Great Basin) in 2002 ...........................................................19Figure BVIII - 19 Emission Offsets by Month, NWPN (Pacific Northwest) in 2002....................................................20Figure BVIII - 20 Emission Offsets by Month, WSSW (Southwest) in 2002 ............................................................21Figure BVIII - 21 Emission Offsets by Month, CALI (California) in 2002.................................................................22Table BVIII - 1 Monthly Offset National Averages and Standard Deviations ...........................................................23
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–2
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 1 Emission Offsets by Month, NEWE (New England) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – NEWE, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–3
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 2 Emission Offsets by Month, NYAS (New York) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – NYAS, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–4
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 3 Emission Offsets by Month, MAAC (Mid-Atlantic) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – MAAC, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–5
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 4 Emission Offsets by Month, ECOV (Ohio Valley) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – ECOV, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–6
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 5 Emission Offsets by Month, ECMI (Michigan) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated Generation and Emission Offsets – ECMI, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–7
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 6 Emission Offsets by Month, SRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SRVC, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–8
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 7 Emission Offsets by Month, SRTV (Tennessee Valley) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SRTV, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–9
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 8 Emission Offsets by Month, SRSO (Southeast) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SRSO, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–10
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 9 Emission Offsets by Month, SRMV (Mississippi Valley) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SRMV, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–11
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 10 Emission Offsets by Month, FRCC (Florida) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – FRCC, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–12
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 11 Emission Offsets by Month, MANN (Wisconsin) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – MANN, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–13
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 12 Emission Offsets by Month, MANS (Illinois) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – MANS, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–14
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 13 Emission Offsets by Month, SPNO (Kansas) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SPNO, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–15
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 14 Emission Offsets by Month, SPSO (Oklahoma) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – SPSO, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–16
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 15 Emission Offsets by Month, ERCT (Texas) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – ERCT, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–17
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 16 Emission Offsets by Month, MAPP (Great Plains) in 2001The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – MAPP, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–18
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 17 Emission Offsets by Month, ROCK (Colorado) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – ROCK, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–19
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 18 Emission Offsets by Month, NWGB (Great Basin) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated Generation and Emission Offsets – NWGB, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–20
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 19 Emission Offsets by Month, NWPN (Pacific Northwest) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated PV Generation and Emission Offsets – NWPN, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–21
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 20 Emission Offsets by Month, WSSW (Southwest) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated Generation and Emission Offsets – WSSW, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–22
SO2
NOxCO2
Figure BVIII - 21 Emission Offsets by Month, CALI (California) in 2002The upper left hand plot shows the simulated photovoltaic generation in the subregion during2002. The subsequent graphs show the quantity of emissions offset along with the rate of offsetper kW of simulated capacity.
Simulated Generation and Emission Offsets – CALI, 2002
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BVIII–23
Emission Offsets per PV Capacity Simulated (g or kg / kW)SO2 (g) NOX (g) CO2 (kg)
MonthNationalAverage
StandardDeviation
NationalAverage
StandardDeviation
NationalAverage
StandardDeviation
Jan 321 178 174 76 86 29Feb 357 186 199 76 98 25Mar 373 198 224 84 110 29Apr 374 220 224 74 117 20May 403 193 252 79 129 21Jun 332 183 233 76 119 22Jul 325 178 222 59 125 20Aug 315 176 216 61 119 19Sep 294 168 196 67 106 17Oct 257 136 161 57 85 18Nov 240 138 145 58 71 18Dec 252 154 152 65 71 23
Table BVIII - 1 Monthly Offset National Averages and Standard Deviations
