Appendix A Uncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data978-1-4614-7190-5/1.pdf · DOI:...
Transcript of Appendix A Uncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data978-1-4614-7190-5/1.pdf · DOI:...
Appendix AUncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data
To compute the uncertainty in the experimental data of this work, error analyseshave been conducted according to the principles proposed by Taylor [1]. The erroranalysis procedures are summarized below:
Uncertainty in Sums and Differences
Suppose that x,…, w are measured with uncertainties dx, …, dw, and themeasured values used to compute
f ¼ xþ � � � þ z� ðuþ � � � þ wÞ
If the uncertainties in x, …, w are known to be independent and random, thenthe uncertainty in f is the quadratic sum of the original uncertainties.
df ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ðdxÞ2 þ � � � þ ðdzÞ2 þ ðduÞ2 þ � � � þ ðdwÞ2q
In any case, df is never larger than their ordinary sum,
df � dxþ � � � þ dzþ duþ � � � þ dw
Uncertainties in Products and Quotients
Suppose that x,…, w are measured with uncertainties dx,…, dw, and themeasured values used to compute
f ¼ x� � � � � z
u� � � � � w
If the uncertainties in x, ..., w are independent and random, then the fractionaluncertainty in f is the sum in quadrature of the original fractional uncertainties,
T. Alam et al., Flow Boiling in Microgap Channels,SpringerBriefs in Thermal Engineering and Applied Science,DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7190-5, � The Author(s) 2014
75
df
fj j ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dx
xj j
� �2
þ � � � þ dz
zj j
� �2
þ du
uj j
� �2
þ � � � þ dw
wj j
� �2s
In any case, it is never larger than their ordinary sum,
df
fj j �dx
xj j þ � � � þdz
zj j þdu
uj j þ � � � þdw
wj j
Uncertainty in Any Function of One Variable
If x is measured with uncertainty dx and is used to calculate the function f(x),then the uncertainty df is
df ¼ df
dx
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
dx
Uncertainty in a Power
If x is measured with uncertainty dx and is used to calculate the power f = xn
(where n is a fixed, known number), then the fractional uncertainty in f is nj j timesthat in x,
df
fj j ¼ nj j dx
xj j
Uncertainty in a Function of Several Variables
Suppose that x,…, z are measured with uncertainties dx,…, dz, and themeasured values used to compute the function f(x, …, z). If the uncertainties inx,…, z are independent and random, then the uncertainty in f is
df ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
of
oxdx
� �2
þ � � � þ of
ozdz
� �2s
In any case, it is never larger than their ordinary sum,
76 Appendix A: Uncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data
df � of
ox
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
dxþ � � � þ of
oz
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
dz
Table A.1 shows the measurement accuracies and experimental uncertaintiesassociated with sensors and parameters.
Table A.2 shows a set of uncertainty values in different parameters calculatedbased on the above equations for 300 lm depth microgap at mass flux, G = 390kg/m2s and heat flux, q00eff ¼ 52:5 W=cm2:
Table A.1 The measurementaccuracies and experimentaluncertainties associated withsensors and parameters
Sensors and parameters Accuracies and uncertainties
T-type thermocouples ±0.5 �CDiode temperature sensors ±0.3 �CFlow meter ±5 ml/minPressure transducer ±1.8 mbarDifferential pressure transducer ±1 mbarVoltage measurement ±0.06 VCurrent measurement ±0.15 ADimension measurement ±10 lmHeat flux 2–8 %Pressure drop 4–18 %Heat transfer coefficient 4–10 %
Appendix A: Uncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data 77
Tab
leA
.2S
ampl
eun
cert
aint
yca
lcul
atio
nfo
r30
0lm
dept
hm
icro
gap
atm
ass
flux
,G
=39
0kg
/m2s
and
heat
flux
,q0 ef
f¼
52:5
W=
cm2
Wid
th(W
)L
engt
h(L
)T
hick
ness
(t)
Vol
tage
(V)
Cur
rent
(I)
Tf
Td
Ks
1.27
±0.
001
cm1.
27±
0.00
1cm
0.06
75±
0.00
1cm
10.7
±0.
06V
8.5
±0.
15A
101.
76±
0.5
�C11
9.6
�C±
0.3
�C1.
21W
/cm
�C
Cal
cula
tion
q00 ef
f¼
q eff A¼
fV;
I;W;
Lð
Þ¼52:5
W/c
m2
dq00 ef
f
q00 ef
f
� �
� �
¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dV Vjj
��
2
þdI Ijj
��
2
þdW Wjj
��
2
þdL Ljj
��
2s
¼0:
0185
5¼
1:85
5%�
2%
Tf¼
Tsa
t
dTf¼
dTsa
t¼�
0:5� C
Tw¼
Td�
q00 ef
ft
Ks
¼11
6:77� C
dTw¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
oT
w
oT
d
:dT
d
��
2
þo
Tw
oq00 ef
f
:dq00 ef
f
��
2
þoT
w
ot:d
t
��
2
þo
Tw
oK
s
:dK
s
��
2s
¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1:dT
dð
Þ2þ�
t Ks
:dq00 ef
f
��
2
þ�
q00 ef
f
Ks
:dt
��
2
þ0
s
¼�
0:3�
C
DT¼
Tw�
Tf¼
15:0
05� C
dT
w�
Tf
ðÞ¼
dDT¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dTw
ðÞ2þ
dTf
ðÞ2
q
¼�
0:6� C h z¼
q00 ef
f
DT
dhz
h zjj¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dq00 ef
f
q00 ef
f
� �
� �
!
2
þdD
T
DTjj
��
2
¼0:
038¼
3:8
%�
4%
v u u t
78 Appendix A: Uncertainty Analysis for Experimental Data
Appendix BNomenclature
A Footprint area (cm2)Ac Wetted area of microchannel (cm2)Agap Microgap cross-sectional area (cm2)Aman Manifold cross-sectional area (cm2)Bl Boiling numberBo Bond numberCo Confinement numbercp Specific heat, (J/kg �C)d Depth of microchannel (lm)D Microgap depth (lm)g Gravitational accelerationG Mass flux (kg/m2s)h Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)hfg Heat of vaporization (J/kg)ks Thermal conductivity, W/cm �CKc Loss coefficientL Length of the substrate (cm)_m Mass flow rate (kg/s)N Number of microchannelsP Pressure (bar)DP Pressure drop (bar)q Total heat dissipation (W)qeff Effective heat dissipation (W)q00eff Effective heat flux (W/cm2)qloss Heat loss (W)Ra Roughness parameter (arithmetic mean value)Re Reynolds numberRt Roughness parameter (maximum peak to valley height)t Substrate thickness (cm)T Temperature (�C)
T. Alam et al., Flow Boiling in Microgap Channels,SpringerBriefs in Thermal Engineering and Applied Science,DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7190-5, � The Author(s) 2014
79
Vd Voltage drop across diode (V)w Channel width (lm)W Width of the substrate (cm)x Vapor qualityz z-Coordinate (axial distance) (cm)
Greek Symbols
q Density (kg/m3)l Dynamic viscosity (Ns/m2)r Surface tension (N/m)g Fin efficiency
Subscripts
c Contractiond Diodee Expansionf Liquidg Vaporgap Microgapi Manifold inleto Manifold outletman Manifolds Substratesat Saturatedsp Single-phasew Wallz Local
80 Appendix B: Nomenclature
Appendix CData Reduction
Heat Transfer Data Reduction
The effective heat supplied, qeff to the fluid in each test piece and the effective heatflux q00eff is calculated as given.
The effective heat transfer rate, qeff to the fluid in microgap channel is obtainedby:
qeff ¼ q� qloss ðC:1Þ
Where q is input power and qloss is heat loss.The effective heat flux q00eff that the heat sink can dissipate is calculated from:
q00eff ¼qeff
AðC:2Þ
where A is the base area of heat sink, A = W 9 L.For microchannel, the total wetted area of the microchannels is:
Ac ¼ Nðwþ 2gdÞL ðC:3Þ
where N is total number of channels; w, d and L are the width, depth, and length ofthe channel respectively and g is the efficiency of a fin with adiabatic tip which iscorrelated by:
g ¼ tanhðmdÞmd
ðC:4Þ
and
m ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2h
Ksww
r
ðC:5Þ
where Ks is the thermal conductivity of the substrate and ww is the width of thechannel wall.
So, the wall heat flux for microchannel is defined as
q00w ¼qeff
Ac
ðC:6Þ
T. Alam et al., Flow Boiling in Microgap Channels,SpringerBriefs in Thermal Engineering and Applied Science,DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7190-5, � The Author(s) 2014
81
The test section is divided into two regions: an upstream subcooled inlet regionand a downstream saturated region as subcooled (Tf,i \ Tsat) water is supplied intothe heat sink for all test conditions; the location of zero thermodynamicequilibrium quality (x = 0) serves as a dividing point between the two regions.
The local heat transfer coefficient in microgap is calculated from,
hz ¼q00eff
Tw�Tf
ðC:7Þ
The local heat transfer coefficient in microchannel is calculated from,
hz ¼qeff
AcðTw�TfÞðC:8Þ
in which Tf is the fluid temperature as defined by
Tf ¼ Tf;i þq00effWz
_mcp
single� phase regionð Þ ðC:9Þ
where z, _m and cp are the axial distance, mass flow rate, and specific heatrespectively.
Tf ¼ Tsat saturated regionð Þ ðC:10Þ
Tw, is the local wall temperature. This temperature is corrected assuming onedimensional heat conduction through the substrate
Tw ¼ Td �q00eff t
Ks
for microgapð Þ ðC:11Þ
Tw ¼ Td �q00effðt � dÞ
Ks
for microchannelð Þ ðC:12Þ
where t and Ks are the substrate thickness and thermal conductivity respectively.Td is the measured temperature by an integrated diode.
Bond number is defined as the ratio of buoyancy force to surface tension force.
Bo ¼gðqf � qgÞ
r
� �
D2 ðC:13Þ
where r is the surface tension, g is the gravitational acceleration, qf and qg areliquid and vapor densities of fluid respectively. D is the gap depth. Some othernon-dimensional parameter like Boiling number, Bl which is non-dimensional heatflux and Reynolds number, Re are defined as follows:
Bl ¼ q00eff
Ghfg
ðC:14Þ
Re ¼ GD
lf
ðC:15Þ
82 Appendix C: Data Reduction
where hfg and lf are the heat of vaporization and dynamic viscosity of fluidrespectively.
Pressure Drop Data Reduction
Pressure taps are located across the microgap and microchannel inlet and outletplenum. These taps are positioned as close as possible to the test die. Pressurelosses by the sudden contraction (DPc) and the sudden enlargement (DPe) werevery small compared with the frictional pressure drop. Though these values arevery small of total pressure changes, the pressure drop and the pressure recovery atthe sudden contraction and the sudden enlargement were considered forcalculation of the total pressure drop.
Pressure losses are calculated based on the methods described in Blevins [2],Chislom and Sutherland [3] and Collier and Thome [4]. As mentioned earlier,subcooled water (Tf, i \ Tsat) is supplied into the heat sink for all test conditions.The pressure drop associated with the liquid flow at the sudden contraction inmicrogap channel is calculated as
DPc ¼G2
2qf
1� Agap
Aman
� �2
þKc
" #
ðC:16Þ
where G is mass flux in the microgap, qf is liquid density and Kc is the non-recoverable loss coefficient for laminar flow given by
Kc ¼ 19lf
GD
�
þ 0:64 ðC:17Þ
The pressure recovery at the sudden enlargement at the exit is calculated as
DPe ¼G2
qf
Agap
Aman
� �
1� Agap
Aman
� �� �
1þ qf
qg
� 1
!
x
" #
ðC:18Þ
The microchannel pressure drops (DP) are calculated as follows. The pressuredrop associated with the liquid flow at the sudden contraction is calculated as
DPc ¼G2
2qf
1� NAch
Aman
� �2
þKc
" #
ðC:19Þ
where G is mass flux in the microgap, qf is liquid density and Kc is the non-recoverable loss coefficient for laminar flow given by
Kc ¼ 0:0088d
w
� �2
� 0:1785d
w
� �
þ 1:6027 ðC:20Þ
Appendix C: Data Reduction 83
The pressure recovery at the sudden enlargement at the exit is calculated as
DPe ¼G2
qf
NAch
Aman
� �
1� NAch
Aman
� �� �
1þ qf
qg
� 1
!
x
" #
ðC:21Þ
Therefore, the pressure drops (DP) reported below are
DP ¼ Pi � DPcð Þ � Po þ DPeð Þ½ ðC:22Þ
References
1. Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physicalmeasurements, University Science Books, 2nd edn. US
2. Blevins RD (1991) Applied fluid dynamics handbook. Krieger Publishing Co., Berlin,pp 77–78
3. Chislom D, Sutherland LA (1969) Prediction of pressure gradients in pipeline systems duringtwo-phase flow. Symposium in two-phase flow systems. University of Leeds
4. Collier JG, Thome JR (1994) Convective boiling and condensation. Clarendon Press, Oxford
84 Appendix C: Data Reduction