APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa...

113
48 APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES

Transcript of APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa...

Page 1: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

48

APPENDIX A

Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 2: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ding toover

49

Table A1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR exceeded FFG during the January 4, 1998 event accorKINX data. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR first exceeded FFG, and the ABR and FFG valuesthe specified time interval are included. Flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR / FFG / TimeInterval

Flash FloodReported

01/0411:46

5786 Subdivision 14.5 PawneeOK

2.58 / 2.50 / 6-hr No

01/0413:43

626062616304

Subdivision““

11.018.935.8

MuskogeeOK

1.34 / 1.00 / 1-hr1.23 / 1.00 / 1-hr1.09 / 1.00 / 1-hr

No

01/0413:43

6171 Subdivision 12.4 SequoyahOK

1.21 / 1.20 / 1-hr No

01/0416:09

616661466082610761666146

Subdivision“““““

26.517.472.964.026.517.4

AdairOK

2.26 / 1.80 / 3-hr2.21 / 1.80 / 3-hr1.88 / 1.80 / 3-hr1.86 / 1.80 / 3-hr2.86 / 2.20 / 6-hr2.83 / 2.20 / 6-hr

Yes / 1530

01/0416:09

596959255959

Subdivision““

42.518.413.7

WashingtonAR

2.53 / 2.20 / 6-hr2.33 / 2.20 / 6-hr2.28 / 2.20 / 6-hr

Yes / 1600

01/0416:09

12431269128

Primary“MAP

27.9108.9406.1

CherokeeOK

2.09 / 1.90 / 6-hr2.04 / 1.90 / 6-hr1.95 / 1.90 / 6-hr

No

01/0416:09

6259633912721297

Subdivision“Primary“

34.110.547.1207.2

McIntoshOK

1.97 / 1.80 / 6-hr2.07 / 1.80 / 6-hr2.27 / 1.80 / 6-hr2.08 / 1.80 / 6-hr

No

Page 3: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

Januaryand is

aled or

50

Table A2. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 1.5 inches/hour during the4, 1998 event according to KINX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 1.5 inches/hournot necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 1.5 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

01/041050

5764 Subdivision 17.7 Washington& Tulsa OK

1.7 No

01/041210

6339 Subdivision 10.5 McIntoshOK

1.7 No

01/041210

6198 Subdivision 20.5 MuskogeeOK

2.1 No

01/041225

58936138

Subdivision“

19.419.7

CherokeeOK

1.52.0

No

01/041255

6171 Subdivision 12.4 SequoyahOK

2.8 No

01/041300

59706092

Subdivision“

39.613.3

AdairOK

2.12.5

Yes / 1530

01/041320

5778 Subdivision 16.1 BentonAR

1.5 No

01/041330

59391201

SubdivisionPrimary

26.252.4

WashingtonAR

1.61.5

Yes / 1600

Page 4: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

51

Figure A1. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/04/98 0700-1000 UTC.

Page 5: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

52

Figure A2. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/04/98 1000-1300 UTC.

Page 6: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

53

Figure A3. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/04/98 1300-1600 UTC.

Page 7: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

54

Figure A4. KINX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 01/04/98 0459-1641 UTC.

Page 8: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

55

Figure A5.

Page 9: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

56

Figure A6.

Page 10: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

57

Figure A7.

Page 11: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

58

Figure A8.

Page 12: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

59

Figure A9.

Page 13: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

60

Figure A10.

Page 14: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

61

Figure A11.

Page 15: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

62

APPENDIX B

Tulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 16: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

Septem-es/hourst

63

Table B1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 1.0 inches/hour during theber 14, 1998 event according to KINX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 1.0 inchand is not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate firequaled or exceeded 1.0 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

09/140340

6187 Subdivision 58.0 MuskogeeOK

1.1 Yes / 0500

09/140345

5961 Subdivision 25.1 CherokeeOK

1.3 Yes / 0445

09/140525

5668 Subdivision 11.2 CraigOK

1.1 No

09/140550

6201 Subdivision 35.9 SequoyahOK

1.1 Yes / 0900

09/140630

60926117

Subdivision“

13.311.6

AdairOK

1.41.4

Yes / 0630

09/140800

5677 Subdivision 18.9 DelawareOK

1.1 Yes / 1015

09/140825

5528 Subdivision 11.5 OttawaOK

1.0 Yes / 0830

Page 17: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

64

Figure B1. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 09/14/98 0100-0400 UTC.

Page 18: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

65

Figure B2. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 09/14/98 0400-0700 UTC.

Page 19: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

66

Figure B3. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 09/14/98 0700-1000 UTC.

Page 20: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

67

Figure B4. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 09/14/98 1000-1300 UTC.

Page 21: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

68

Figure B5.

Page 22: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

69

Figure B6.

Page 23: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

70

Figure B7.

Page 24: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

71

APPENDIX C

Tulsa Case Study #3 - October 5, 1998

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 25: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ding toover

72

Table C1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR exceeded FFG during the October 5, 1998 event accorKINX data. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR first exceeded FFG, and the ABR and FFG valuesthe specified time interval are included. Flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR / FFG /Time Interval

Flash FloodReported / Time

10/051333

6883 Subdivision 113.8 DelawareOK

2.75 / 2.70 / 6-hr(Mayes)

Yes / 1200

10/051628

506 Major 184.8 CherokeeOK

2.47 / 2.40 / 3-hr Yes / 1100

10/051628

506 Major 184.8 SequoyahOK

2.47 / 2.40 / 3-hr(Cherokee)

Yes / 1800

10/051658

1243 Primary 25.8 AdairOK

2.75 / 2.40 / 3-hr Yes / 1700

10/051658

6261 Subdivision 18.9 MuskogeeOK

2.29 / 2.20 / 3-hr Yes / 1230

10/051928

64666450

Subdivision“

23.813.3

LatimerOK

2.09 / 2.00 / 3-hr2.08 / 2.00 / 3-hr

Yes / 1900

10/052028

6525 Subdivision 19.4 LeFloreOK

2.13 / 2.00 / 1-hr Yes / 1900

10/052357

6517 Subdivision 28.8 PittsburgOK

2.43 / 2.30 / 3-hr Yes / 1700

10/060123

6415639813181316

Subdivision“Primary“

19.515.361.654.5

SebastianAR

2.70 / 2.40 / 6-hr2.66 / 2.40 / 6-hr2.78 / 2.40 / 6-hr2.53 / 2.40 / 6-hr

Yes / 1900

10/060123

63931308

SubdivisionPrimary

20.482.1

HaskellOK

1.85 / 1.80 / 6-hr2.03 / 1.80 / 6-hr

Yes / 1500

Page 26: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ctoberand is

aled or

73

Table C2. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 1.5 inches/hour during the O5, 1998 event according to KINX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 1.5 inches/hournot necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 1.5 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

10/050815

5708 Subdivision 21.3 BentonAR

1.5 Yes / 1030

10/050815

5677 Subdivision 18.9 DelawareOK

1.5 Yes / 1200

10/050830

5904 Subdivision 16.1 CherokeeOK

1.5 Yes / 1100

10/051115

6211 Subdivision 13.1 OkfuskeeOK

1.9 Yes / 1400

10/051200

6098 Subdivision 30.3 MuskogeeOK

1.8 Yes / 1230

10/051500

60926117

Subdivision“

13.311.6

AdairOK

1.61.6

Yes / 1700

10/051510

6171 Subdivision 12.4 SequoyahOK

1.9 Yes / 1800

10/051600

5968 Subdivision 26.2 WashingtonAR

1.8 Yes / 1500

10/051620

6277 Subdivision 9.8 HaskellOK

1.5 Yes / 1500

10/051620

6543 Subdivision 14.4 PittsburgOK

2.0 Yes / 1700

10/051715

6464 Subdivision 14.8 LatimerOK

1.5 Yes / 1900

10/051845

6377 Subdivision 16.4 LeFloreOK

2.7 Yes / 1900

10/051845

6218 Subdivision 36.2 CrawfordAR

2.5 No

10/051930

6289 Subdivision 14.9 SebastianAR

1.7 Yes / 1900

10/052000

6026 Subdivision 11.6 MadisonAR

3.0 No

10/052045

5857 Subdivision 58.5 CarrollAR

2.8 No

Page 27: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

74

Figure C1. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 0800-1100 UTC.

Page 28: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

75

Figure C2. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 1100-1400 UTC.

Page 29: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

76

Figure C3. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 1400-1700 UTC.

Page 30: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

77

Figure C4. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 1700-2000 UTC.

Page 31: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

78

Figure C5. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 2000-2300 UTC.

Page 32: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

79

Figure C6. KINX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 10/05/98 0750-0151 UTC.

Page 33: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

80

Figure C7.

Page 34: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

81

Figure C8.

Page 35: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

82

Figure C9.

Page 36: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

83

Figure C10.

Page 37: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

84

Figure C11.

Page 38: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

85

Figure C12.

Page 39: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

86

Figure C13.

Page 40: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

87

APPENDIX D

Tulsa Case Study #4 - April 25, 1999

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 41: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ding toover

88

Table D1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR exceeded FFG during the April 25, 1999 event accorKINX data. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR first exceeded FFG, and the ABR and FFG valuesthe specified time interval are included. Flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR / FFG /Time Interval

Flash FloodReported / Time

04/251108

5804582658245747

Subdivision“““

13.355.037.024.4

PawneeOK

1.22 / 1.10 / 3-hr1.15 / 1.10 / 3-hr1.14 / 1.10 / 3-hr1.12 / 1.10 / 3-hr

No

04/251208

572156845756

Subdivision““

14.012.438.6

OsageOK

1.51 / 1.30 / 3-hr1.46 / 1.30 / 3-hr1.46 / 1.30 / 3-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251338

559868441138

Subdivision“Primary

10.923.152.3

NowataOK

0.90 / 0.80 / 1-hr1.33 / 1.20 / 3-hr1.35 / 1.20 / 3-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251408

5674 Subdivision 11.5 RogersOK

2.13 / 2.10 / 6-hr Yes / 1430

04/251438

55255505

Subdivision“

31.317.4

CraigOK

2.05 / 1.90 / 6-hr2.01 / 1.90 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251508

548311061115

SubdivisionPrimary“

21.951.831.3

OttawaOK

1.84 / 1.70 / 6-hr1.77 / 1.70 / 6-hr1.74 / 1.70 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251538

6170 Subdivision 14.8 OkmulgeeOK

1.71 / 1.50 / 3-hr No

04/251715

5960 Subdivision 13.3 WagonerOK

1.73 / 1.50 / 3-hr Yes / 1430

04/251813

6097603160466038607561136136614861281223560567122120

Subdivision““““““““PrimaryMajor“MAP“

13.811.612.813.714.514.015.710.215.678.3357.9252.977.239.5

CreekOK

1.12 / 0.90 / 3-hr0.99 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.23 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.39 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.12 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.92 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.72 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.67 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.57 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.58 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.54 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.53 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.58 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.46 / 1.40 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251813

1433119457965795580358945767

Primary“Subdivision““““

18.9461.911.236.511.624.711.7

MayesOK

0.72 / 0.70 / 1-hr1.53 / 1.50 / 6-hr1.65 / 1.50 / 6-hr1.57 / 1.50 / 6-hr1.55 / 1.50 / 6-hr1.53 / 1.50 / 6-hr1.53 / 1.50 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

Page 42: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

89

04/251813

618261846186622262426181625612681263

Subdivision““““““Primary“

28.410.147.027.09.818.227.947.990.4

OkfuskeeOK

1.92 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.78 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.66 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.54 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.50 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.45 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.44 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.62 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.61 / 1.40 / 6-hr

No

04/251813

105597958135924583257641176

MAPSubdivision““““Primary

562.411.211.19.714.417.735.0

TulsaOK

1.10 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.10 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.60 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.58 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.56 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.49 / 1.40 / 6-hr1.65 / 1.40 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

04/251813

1161686768545671

PrimarySubdivision““

51.411.811.319.3

WashingtonOK

1.87 / 1.80 / 6-hr1.86 / 1.80 / 6-hr1.86 / 1.80 / 6-hr1.81 / 1.80 / 6-hr

Yes / 1430

Page 43: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

pril 25,and isaled or

90

Table D2. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 1.5 inches/hour during the A1999 event according to KINX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 1.5 inches/hour not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 1.5 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

04/250715

6047 Subdivision 33.3 CreekOK

1.5 Yes / 1430

04/250820

5882 Subdivision 17.6 OsageOK

2.1 Yes / 1430

04/251045

5855 Subdivision 15.1 TulsaOK

2.0 Yes / 1430

04/251045

5823 Subdivision 13.5 PawneeOK

1.6 No

04/251230

61826256

Subdivision“

28.427.9

OkfuskeeOK

2.11.8

No

04/251300

6177 Subdivision 11.3 OkmulgeeOK

2.4 No

04/251400

57965803

Subdivision“ 11.6

MayesOK

1.51.6

Yes / 1430

04/251415

6860 Subdivision 11.4 CraigOK

1.5 Yes / 1430

04/251630

5960 Subdivision 13.3 WagonerOK

1.6 Yes / 1430

04/251720

5921 Subdivision 19.1 RogersOK

1.8 Yes / 1430

Page 44: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

91

Figure D1. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 04/25/99 1200-1500 UTC.

Page 45: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

92

Figure D2. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 04/25/99 1600-1900 UTC.

Page 46: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

93

Figure D3. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 04/25/99 1900-2200 UTC.

Page 47: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

94

Figure D4. KINX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 04/25/99 0231-1539 UTC.

Page 48: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

95

Figure D5.

Page 49: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

96

Figure D6.

Page 50: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

97

Figure D7.

Page 51: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

98

Figure D8.

Page 52: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

99

Figure D9.

Page 53: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

100

Figure D10.

Page 54: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

101

Figure D11.

Page 55: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

102

APPENDIX E

Tulsa Case Study #5 - June 20, 1999

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 56: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ding toover

103

Table E1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR exceeded FFG during the June 20, 1999 event accorKINX data. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR first exceeded FFG, and the ABR and FFG valuesthe specified time interval are included. Flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR / FFG /Time Interval

Flash FloodReported / Time

06/200926

57501433

SubdivisionPrimary

15.418.9

MayesOK

1.59 / 1.40 / 1-hr1.53 / 1.40 / 1-hr

Yes / 1045

06/201154

56855691

Subdivision“

29.413.3

RogersOK

1.54 / 1.40 / 3-hr1.42 / 1.40 / 3-hr

Yes / 1300

06/201223

56345626

Subdivision“

11.416.7

CraigOK

1.30 / 1.30 / 3-hr1.30 / 1.30 / 3-hr

Yes / 1300

06/201223

56516857

Subdivision“

14.736.2

NowataOK

1.17 / 0.90 / 3-hr1.07 / 0.90 / 3-hr

Yes / 1545

06/201253

5953 Subdivision 15.6 CherokeeOK

2.52 / 2.50 / 3-hr Yes / 0945

06/201421

6142 Subdivision 10.6 MuskogeeOK

2.03 / 2.00 / 3-hr No

06/201648

57835798

Subdivision“

19.710.2

OsageOK

1.46 / 1.40 / 3-hr1.44 / 1.40 / 3-hr

No

Page 57: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

une 20,and isaled or

104

Table E2. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 1.5 inches/hour during the J1999 event according to KINX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 1.5 inches/hour not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 1.5 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports in Storm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

06/200845

5796 Subdivision 11.2 MayesOK

1.7 Yes / 1045

06/200850

5904 Subdivision 16.1 CherokeeOK

1.7 Yes / 0945

06/201405

5760 Subdivision 19.1 RogersOK

1.5 Yes / 1300

Page 58: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

105

Figure E1. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/20/99 0400-0700 UTC.

Page 59: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

106

Figure E2. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/20/99 0700-1000 UTC.

Page 60: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

107

Figure E3. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/20/99 1000-1300 UTC.

Page 61: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

108

Figure E4. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/20/99 1300-1600 UTC.

Page 62: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

109

Figure E5. KINX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/20/99 1600-1900 UTC.

Page 63: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

110

Figure E6. KINX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 06/19/99 1133 - 06/20/99 1812 UTC.

Page 64: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

111

Figure E7.

Page 65: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

112

Figure E8.

Page 66: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

113

Figure E9.

Page 67: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

114

Figure E10.

Page 68: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

115

Figure E11.

Page 69: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

116

Figure E12.

Page 70: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

117

Figure E13.

Page 71: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

118

APPENDIX F

Sterling Case Study #1 - June 27, 1995

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 72: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ding toover

119

Table F1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR exceeded FFG during the June 27, 1995 event accorKLWX data. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR first exceeded FFG, and the ABR and FFG valuesthe specified time interval are included. Flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR / FFG /Time Interval

Flash FloodReported / Time

06/271605

6075 Subdivision 39.4 MadisonVA

2.04 / 1.70 / 3-hr Yes / 1030

06/271802

6091 Subdivision 27.3 GreeneVA

2.57 / 2.30 / 6-hr Yes / 1430

Page 73: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

June 27-ur andaled or

120

Table F2. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 0.6 inches/hour during the 28, 1995 event according to KLWX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 0.6 inches/hois not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 0.6 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

06/270630

6146 Subdivision 30.9 MadisonVA

1.0 Yes / 1030

06/270630

6157 Subdivision 38.4 OrangeVA

0.8 Yes / 1030

06/270640

5811 Subdivision 23.4 LoudounVA

0.9 No

06/270640

5620 Subdivision 12.7 BerkeleyWV

0.9 No

06/270645

6184 Subdivision 20.0 GreeneVA

0.7 Yes / 1430

06/270700

5773 Subdivision 10.0 ClarkeVA

0.6 No

06/270715

6035 Subdivision 11.9 RappahannockVA

1.1 Yes / 1230

06/270740

5904 Subdivision 9.3 FauquierVA

0.9 Yes / 1230

06/270915

6105 Subdivision 10.3 CulpeperVA

1.2 Yes / 1300

06/271050

5886 Subdivision 30.0 WarrenVA

0.7 Yes / 1230

06/271220

5779 Subdivision 17.4 FrederickVA

0.6 Yes / 1330

06/271225

6187 Subdivision 10.2 AlbemarleVA

1.0 Yes / 030006/28

06/280000

62941305

SubdivisionPrimary

10.520.7

NelsonVA

1.10.7

Yes / 0400

Page 74: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

121

Figure F1. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 0600-0900 UTC.

Page 75: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

122

Figure F2. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 0900-1200 UTC.

Page 76: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

123

Figure F3. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 1200-1500 UTC.

Page 77: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

124

Figure F4. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 1500-1800 UTC.

Page 78: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

125

Figure F5. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 1900-2200 UTC.

Page 79: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

126

Figure F6. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 2200 - 06/28/95 0100 UTC.

Page 80: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

127

Figure F7. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 06/28/95 0100-0400 UTC.

Page 81: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

128

Figure F8. KLWX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 0558-1804 UTC.

Page 82: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

129

Figure F9. KLWX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 06/27/95 1810 - 06/28/95 0420 UTC.

Page 83: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

130

Figure F10.

Page 84: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

131

Figure F11.

Page 85: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

132

Figure F12.

Page 86: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

133

Figure F13.

Page 87: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

134

APPENDIX G

Sterling Case Study #2 - October 20-21, 1995

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 88: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

ctobers/hourst

135

Table G1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 0.6 inches/hour during the O20-21, 1995 event according to KLWX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 0.6 incheand is not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate firequaled or exceeded 0.6 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

10/202315

6670 Subdivision 20.7 FauquierVA

0.7 No

10/210005

6307 Subdivision 9.9 NelsonVA

0.8 Yes / 0145

10/210005

56816619

Subdivision“

12.32.8

FrederickVA

0.80.7

No

10/210020

5930 Subdivision 10.1 RockinghamVA

0.6 Yes / 0200

10/210025

5803 Subdivision 11.5 HardyWV

0.7 No

10/210045

5725 Subdivision 15.4 HampshireWV

0.7 No

10/210115

5620 Subdivision 12.7 BerkeleyWV

0.7 No

10/210115

6240 Subdivision 15.1 AlbemarleVA

0.7 No

10/210130

5885 Subdivision 9.6 ShenandoahVA

0.7 Yes / 0430

10/210230

6184 Subdivision 20.0 GreeneVA

0.8 No

10/210235

6144 Subdivision 9.8 MadisonVA

0.9 Yes / 0430

10/210250

5886 Subdivision 30.0 WarrenVA

0.7 Yes / 0330

10/210300

5966 Subdivision 13.1 PageVA

0.7 Yes / 0330

10/210315

5969 Subdivision 21.0 RappahannockVA

0.9 No

10/210330

6192 Subdivision 12.7 SpotsylvaniaVA

0.8 No

10/210340

5718 Subdivision 14.9 JeffersonWV

0.9 No

10/210355

6109 Subdivision 10.5 OrangeVA

0.8 No

10/210400

57565773

Subdivision“

12.710.0

ClarkeVA

0.70.7

No

Page 89: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

136

10/210405

6638 Subdivision 3.9 LoudounVA

0.7 No

10/210410

6060 Subdivision 9.9 FauquierVA

0.7 No

10/210415

6664 Subdivision 1.5 FairfaxVA

0.7 No

10/210455

573157465775

Subdivision““

19.29.916.1

MontgomeryMD

1.20.80.8

No

10/210455

5645565457056587659666166864

Subdivision““““““

10.313.115.63.16.76.985.2

FrederickMD

0.70.80.70.90.81.20.8

No

10/210505

5873 Subdivision 34.7 Prince WilliamVA

0.7 No

10/210615

5729 Subdivision 9.5 HowardMD

1.1 No

10/210715

6166 Subdivision 14.9 King GeorgeVA

1.0 No

10/210720

5529 Subdivision 9.3 HarfordMD

0.9 No

10/210725

6078 Subdivision 39.3 CharlesMD

1.0 No

10/210805

5990 Subdivision 9.8 Prince George’sMD

0.8 No

Page 90: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

137

Figure G1. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/20/95 2300 - 10/21/95 0200 UTC.

Page 91: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

138

Figure G2. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/21/95 0300-0600 UTC.

Page 92: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

139

Figure G3. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 10/21/95 0600-0900 UTC.

Page 93: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

140

Figure G4. KLWX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 10/20/95 1732 - 10/21/95 1018 UTC.

Page 94: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

141

Figure G5.

Page 95: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

142

Figure G6.

Page 96: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

143

Figure G7.

Page 97: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

144

APPENDIX H

Sterling Case Study #3 - January 19, 1996

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 98: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

Januaryur andaled or

145

Table H1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 0.5 inches/hour during the19, 1996 event according to KLWX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 0.5 inches/hois not necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 0.5 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

01/191015

5562 Subdivision 72.7 AlleganyMD

0.6 Yes / 0800

01/191040

58186643

Subdivision“

10.68.3

GrantWV

0.60.5

Yes / 0800

01/191045

5700 Subdivision 19.2 MineralWV

0.5 Yes / 0800

01/191105

5935 Subdivision 16.6 HardyWV

0.5 Yes / 0900

01/191115

5588 Subdivision 14.9 HampshireWV

0.5 Yes / 0900

01/191130

5888 Subdivision 24.4 ShenandoahVA

0.5 Yes / 1000

01/191140

63076760

Subdivision“

9.944.9

NelsonVA

0.70.5

Yes / 0630

01/191140

6179 Subdivision 18.8 AugustaVA

0.5 Yes / 0630

01/191215

5924 Subdivision 10.2 PendletonWV

0.5 Yes / 0900

01/191300

6301 Subdivision 13.9 AlbemarleVA

0.5 Yes / 0630

01/191330

552855851123

Subdivision“Primary

10.444.4147.0

MorganWV

1.20.50.5

Yes / 1000

01/191330

568157085779

Subdivision““

12.338.717.4

FrederickVA

0.50.50.6

Yes / 1000

01/191340

6157 Subdivision 38.4 OrangeVA

1.0 Yes / 1300

01/191340

596659741228

Subdivision“Primary

13.119.334.9

PageVA

0.50.50.5

Yes / 0630

01/191340

61386146

Subdivision 12.430.9

MadisonVA

0.60.6

Yes / 0630

01/191340

6814 Subdivision 27.2 WashingtonMD

0.8 Yes / 1000

01/191345

554855595620

Subdivision““

20.726.712.7

BerkeleyWV

0.60.50.7

Yes / 1100

Page 99: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

146

01/191345

5883 Subdivision 14.2 WarrenVA

0.6 Yes / 1100

01/191410

59275939

Subdivision“

9.615.6

FauquierVA

0.60.6

Yes / 1200

01/191410

5679 Subdivision 8.9 JeffersonWV

0.7 Yes / 1100

01/191410

5726 Subdivision 9.0 ClarkeVA

0.8 Yes / 1100

01/191410

5998 Subdivision 16.9 CulpeperVA

1.1 Yes / 1300

01/191420

6114616161746192619661996204

Subdivision““““““

19.349.315.912.79.741.018.3

SpotsylvaniaVA

1.10.60.70.80.80.70.6

Yes / 1500

01/191425

579558116647119513871425

Subdivision““Primary““

21.423.48.155.050.1336.4

LoudounVA

0.60.50.70.50.70.7

Yes / 1200

01/191425

589259516677

Subdivision““

33.923.976.1

Prince WilliamVA

0.50.60.5

Yes / 1400

01/191435

6061 Subdivision 15.5 StaffordVA

1.0 Yes / 1500

01/191445

58635898666468371393

Subdivision“““Primary

46.69.31.541.061.7

FairfaxVA

0.60.90.70.90.7

Yes / 1400

01/191445

555856645714

Subdivision““

21.017.011.2

FrederickMD

0.50.60.6

Yes / 1200

01/191455

5780 Subdivision 12.7 MontgomeryMD

0.5 Yes / 1400

01/191515

5694 Subdivision 28.7 HowardMD

0.5 Yes / 1400

01/191515

559665826821

Subdivision““

23.227.51.4

CarrollMD

0.50.70.9

Yes / 1200

01/191515

6053606960786682

Subdivision“““

22.313.139.349.2

CharlesMD

0.81.00.50.6

No

Page 100: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

147

01/191515

6655 Subdivision 7.5 Prince George’sMD

0.7 Yes / 1500

01/191515

5895 Subdivision 20.6 ArlingtonVA

1.2 Yes / 1600

01/191520

61316166

Subdivision“

23.614.9

King GeorgeVA

1.00.8

No

01/191535

6835 Subdivision 29.1 District ofColumbia

1.0 Yes / 1600

01/191540

5648 Subdivision 9.1 BaltimoreMD

0.5 Yes / 1400

01/191550

61016104

Subdivision“

36.230.6

St. Mary’sMD

0.90.7

No

01/191610

5697 Subdivision 38.3 Baltimore CityMD

0.9 Yes / 1600

01/191610

5920 Subdivision 12.3 Anne ArundelMD

0.5 Yes / 1600

01/191615

59736017604160646086

Subdivision““““

21.026.713.613.923.8

CalvertMD

0.70.91.20.80.6

No

01/191615

55575631

Subdivision“

12.656.3

HarfordMD

0.70.6

Yes / 1400

Page 101: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

148

Figure H1. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/19/96 0900-1200 UTC.

Page 102: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

149

Figure H2. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/19/96 1200-1500 UTC.

Page 103: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

150

Figure H3. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 01/19/96 1500-1800 UTC.

Page 104: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

151

Figure H4. KLWX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 01/19/96 0406-1915 UTC.

Page 105: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

152

Figure H5.

Page 106: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

153

APPENDIX I

Sterling Case Study #4 - July 1-2, 1997

DATA AND FIGURES

Page 107: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

uly 1-2,r and isaled or

154

Table I1. The first basin(s) in each county where ABR rate equaled or exceeded 0.6 inches/hour during the J1995 event according to KLWX data. The ABR rate shown is the first rate to equal or exceed 0.6 inches/hounot necessarily the peak rate during the event. The date and time (in UTC) indicate when ABR rate first equexceeded 0.6 inches/hour, and flash flood verification is based on reports inStorm Data.

Date /Time

BasinID(s)

BasinType

DrainageArea (mi2)

County ABR Rate(inches/hour)

Flash FloodReported / Time

07/020040

61406150

Subdivision“

44.127.8

GreeneVA

0.60.6

Yes / 0200

07/020115

66696670

Subdivision“

9.520.7

FauquierVA

0.60.6

No

07/020105

6096 Subdivision 13.9 MadisonVA

0.6 Yes / 0200

07/020315

6713 Subdivision 83.2 OrangeVA

0.7 Yes / 0300

07/020645

6183 Subdivision 15.8 SpotsylvaniaVA

0.6 No

07/020715

6085 Subdivision 57.6 StaffordVA

0.6 No

07/020815

6104 Subdivision 30.6 St. Mary’sMD

0.6 No

Page 108: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

155

Figure I1. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 07/01/97 2300 - 07/02/97 0200 UTC.

Page 109: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

156

Figure I2. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 07/02/97 0200-0500 UTC.

Page 110: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

157

Figure I3. KLWX 3-hour Precipitation Image: 07/02/97 0500-0800 UTC.

Page 111: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

158

Figure I4. KLWX Storm Total Precipitation Image: 07/02/97 0921-1113 UTC.

Page 112: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

159

Figure I5.

Page 113: APPENDIX A Tulsa Case Study #1 - January 4, 1998 … › projects › basins › appendices.pdfTulsa Case Study #2 - September 14, 1998 DATA AND FIGURES 63 Table B1. The first basin(s)

160

Figure I6.