APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ......

90
DRAFT A - 1 APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS Please note that the page numbers for the Synchro output sheets are discontinuous, since output sheets corresponding to the intersections evaluated as part of this SEIR have been included and output sheets of the remaing intersections that were studied for the EIR, but not analyzed for the SEIR have been deleted.

Transcript of APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ......

Page 1: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

DRAFT

A - 1

APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS

Please note that the page numbers for the Synchro output sheets are discontinuous, since output sheets corresponding to the intersections evaluated as part of this SEIR have been included and output sheets of the remaing intersections that were studied for the EIR, but not analyzed for the SEIR have been deleted.

Page 2: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

DRAFT

A - 2

2030 PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS

Page 3: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 40 164 0 0 416 638 30 0 726 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 178 0 0 452 693 33 0 789 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 452 178 491 717 89 975 1064 573vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 452 178 491 717 89 975 1064 573tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 96 100 93 100 17 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1084 1373 446 339 951 34 213 463

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1Volume Total 103 119 301 844 822Volume Left 43 0 0 0 33Volume Right 0 0 0 693 789cSH 1084 1700 1700 1700 910Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.07 0.18 0.50 0.90Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 0 322Control Delay (s) 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.7Lane LOS A DApproach Delay (s) 1.8 0.0 32.7Approach LOS D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 12.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 4: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: University Frontage North & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 0 0 26 6 55 1 76 0 0 164 7Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 28 7 60 1 83 0 0 178 8

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 95 84 186Volume Left (vph) 28 1 0Volume Right (vph) 60 0 8Hadj (s) -0.29 0.04 0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.3 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.11 0.10 0.22Capacity (veh/h) 795 798 833Control Delay (s) 7.7 7.8 8.4Approach Delay (s) 7.7 7.8 8.4Approach LOS A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 8.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 5: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: University Frontage South & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 62 24 13 183 0Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 9 2 0 0 0 0 67 26 14 199 0

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 16 93 213Volume Left (vph) 5 0 14Volume Right (vph) 2 26 0Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.13 0.05Departure Headway (s) 4.6 4.0 4.1Degree Utilization, x 0.02 0.10 0.24Capacity (veh/h) 727 876 874Control Delay (s) 7.7 7.5 8.4Approach Delay (s) 7.7 7.5 8.4Approach LOS A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 8.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 6: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Addison Street & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 12 50 192 18 17 19 16 55 9 32 171 17Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 54 209 20 18 21 17 60 10 35 186 18

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 276 59 87 239Volume Left (vph) 13 20 17 35Volume Right (vph) 209 21 10 18Hadj (s) -0.41 -0.11 0.01 0.02Departure Headway (s) 4.4 5.0 5.0 4.8Degree Utilization, x 0.34 0.08 0.12 0.32Capacity (veh/h) 767 655 656 699Control Delay (s) 9.6 8.4 8.7 10.1Approach Delay (s) 9.6 8.4 8.7 10.1Approach LOS A A A B

Intersection SummaryDelay 9.6HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 7: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 133 1095 468 88 1360 87 260 209 67 86 227 328Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3262 1719 3438 1356 3433 1776 1770 1863 1517Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3262 1719 3438 1356 3433 1776 1084 1863 1517Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 143 1177 503 95 1462 94 274 220 71 97 255 369RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 35 0 0 0 17 0 11 0 0 0 145Lane Group Flow (vph) 143 1645 0 95 1462 77 274 280 0 97 255 224Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 4Permitted Phases 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 54.6 10.3 53.9 53.9 14.5 41.1 22.6 22.6 22.6Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 54.6 10.3 53.9 53.9 14.5 41.1 22.6 22.6 22.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.09 0.45 0.45 0.12 0.34 0.19 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 1484 148 1544 609 415 608 204 351 286v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.50 0.06 c0.43 c0.08 0.16 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.09 c0.15v/c Ratio 0.91 1.11 0.64 0.95 0.13 0.66 0.46 0.48 0.73 0.78Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 32.7 53.1 31.7 19.3 50.4 30.8 43.4 45.8 46.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.72 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 44.6 59.0 7.3 11.2 0.3 3.8 0.5 1.6 6.7 12.1Delay (s) 98.6 91.7 57.7 34.1 8.4 54.4 31.5 44.1 51.4 58.3Level of Service F F E C A D C D D EApproach Delay (s) 92.2 34.0 42.6 54.0Approach LOS F C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 60.3 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 8: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 0 61 0 0 130 30 426 26 38 656 71Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 66 0 0 141 33 463 28 41 713 77PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 550 479pX, platoon unblocked 0.90 0.90 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.87 0.94vC, conflicting volume 1518 1391 752 1443 1415 477 790 491vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1377 1236 644 1294 1263 415 688 430tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 84 100 100 76 96 96cM capacity (veh/h) 79 146 413 99 141 601 792 1065

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 66 141 524 832Volume Left 0 0 33 41Volume Right 66 141 28 77cSH 413 601 792 1065Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.24 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 23 3 3Control Delay (s) 15.4 12.8 1.1 1.0Lane LOS C B A AApproach Delay (s) 15.4 12.8 1.1 1.0Approach LOS C B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 9: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 86 28 36 34 75 40 77 344 14 50 610 96Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1726 1756 1770 1849 1770 1812Flt Permitted 0.72 0.91 0.27 1.00 0.52 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1280 1619 512 1849 963 1812Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 93 30 39 37 82 43 84 374 15 54 663 104RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 24 0 0 2 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 140 0 0 138 0 84 387 0 54 760 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 11.3 11.3 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7Effective Green, g (s) 11.3 11.3 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 305 339 1223 637 1199v/s Ratio Prot 0.21 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.09 0.16 0.06v/c Ratio 0.58 0.45 0.25 0.32 0.08 0.63Uniform Delay, d1 22.2 21.6 4.1 4.3 3.6 5.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.86Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 1.1 1.7 0.7 0.2 1.5Delay (s) 25.7 22.7 5.8 5.0 3.6 6.6Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 25.7 22.7 5.2 6.4Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 10: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis26: University Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 26

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 15 1192 61 28 1514 9 22 5 31 3 8 9Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.71 0.71 0.71Hourly flow rate (vph) 15 1229 63 32 1740 10 38 9 53 4 11 13PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 300 660pX, platoon unblocked 0.73 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.73vC, conflicting volume 1751 1292 2244 3106 646 2513 3132 875vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1285 14 206 1423 0 585 1461 83tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 96 96 91 90 91 98 87 98cM capacity (veh/h) 379 904 432 88 620 223 84 699

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 630 677 902 880 100 28Volume Left 15 0 32 0 38 4Volume Right 0 63 0 10 53 13cSH 379 1700 904 1700 368 164Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.40 0.04 0.52 0.27 0.17Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 3 0 27 15Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 18.4 31.4Lane LOS A A C DApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 18.4 31.4Approach LOS C D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 11: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBR2 SELLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 3 56 67 140 58 189 61 219 0 124 0 187Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1726 1799 1583 1681 1681 1583 1770Flt Permitted 0.52 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 894 1799 1583 1681 1745 1583 1770Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 3 68 82 194 81 205 74 238 0 151 0 203RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 97 0 0 275 205 67 0 245 43 0 203Turn Type Perm Split Perm Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 2 6 6 3 8 7Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 14.8 14.8 3.1 21.0 21.0 10.1Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 14.8 14.8 3.1 21.0 21.0 10.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.14Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 362 319 71 499 452 243v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.04 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.13 0.14 0.03v/c Ratio 0.69 0.76 0.64 0.94 0.49 0.10 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 29.3 27.7 26.9 35.1 21.8 19.3 30.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 13.6 8.9 4.4 86.8 3.4 0.4 21.3Delay (s) 42.9 36.5 31.3 121.9 25.2 19.7 52.2Level of Service D D C F C B DApproach Delay (s) 42.9 34.3 37.4 32.8Approach LOS D C D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 12: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 28

Movement SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 416 3Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00Frt 0.85Flt Protected 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1583Flt Permitted 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 452 3RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 455 0Turn Type customProtected Phases 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 28.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39Clearance Time (s) 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 614v/s Ratio Prot c0.29v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.74Uniform Delay, d1 19.3Progression Factor 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.8Delay (s) 24.1Level of Service CApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 13: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis28: Parker Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 29

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 14 10 4 11 7 15 46 378 84 21 608 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1719 1770 1812 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.15 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1353 1583 1719 285 1812 535 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84Adj. Flow (vph) 20 14 6 16 10 22 55 455 101 25 724 12RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 21 0 0 12 0 0 0 4Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 34 2 0 27 0 55 544 0 25 724 8Turn Type Perm Prot Split Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 21.0 4.7 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21.0 4.7 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3 34.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 472 115 139 882 260 906 770v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.02 0.30 c0.39v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.19 0.05 0.00v/c Ratio 0.08 0.00 0.24 0.40 0.62 0.10 0.80 0.01Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 17.4 31.2 11.5 13.3 9.8 15.2 9.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 1.1 1.9 1.3 0.2 5.0 0.0Delay (s) 18.2 17.4 32.3 13.4 14.6 9.9 20.2 9.3Level of Service B B C B B A C AApproach Delay (s) 18.1 32.3 14.5 19.7Approach LOS B C B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.5 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 14: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis29: Grayson Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 30

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 4 3 11 71 12 21 84 543 66 12 560 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.97 0.99 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 1752 1828 1854Flt Permitted 0.92 0.78 0.86 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1575 1406 1590 1827Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 20 88 15 26 97 624 76 14 659 19RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 5 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 15 0 0 112 0 0 792 0 0 691 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 7.9 33.3 33.3Effective Green, g (s) 7.9 7.9 33.3 33.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.68 0.68Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 226 1076 1237v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.08 c0.50 0.38v/c Ratio 0.06 0.50 0.74 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 17.5 18.8 5.1 4.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 1.7 2.7 0.6Delay (s) 17.6 20.6 7.8 4.7Level of Service B C A AApproach Delay (s) 17.6 20.6 7.8 4.7Approach LOS B C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.2 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 15: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Heinz Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 31

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 10 55 50 36 24 201 740 86 30 457 79Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1670 1768 1770 1834 1770 1821Flt Permitted 0.95 0.84 0.31 1.00 0.13 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1604 1511 576 1834 248 1821Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Adj. Flow (vph) 14 12 65 79 57 38 216 796 92 35 531 92RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 15 0 0 7 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 45 0 0 159 0 216 881 0 35 612 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 476 449 333 1060 143 1053v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.11 0.37 0.14v/c Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.65 0.83 0.24 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 16.3 17.7 9.1 11.0 6.6 8.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.2 4.3 5.7 0.9 0.8Delay (s) 16.7 19.9 13.4 16.6 7.5 9.4Level of Service B B B B A AApproach Delay (s) 16.7 19.9 16.0 9.3Approach LOS B B B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 16: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 12 20 59 19 13 59 156 980 48 50 443 47Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1828 1515 1810 1511 3484 4978Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1622 1515 1478 1511 3484 4978Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 18 30 89 27 19 84 173 1089 53 63 561 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 82 0 0 77 0 2 0 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 48 7 0 46 7 0 1313 0 0 673 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 67.5 21.8Effective Green, g (s) 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 67.5 21.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.61 0.20Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 120 117 120 2138 987v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 c0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.00 c0.03 0.00v/c Ratio 0.38 0.06 0.39 0.06 0.61 0.68Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 46.9 48.1 46.8 13.2 40.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.2 2.2 0.2 0.1 2.0Delay (s) 49.9 47.1 50.3 47.0 4.9 42.8Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 48.1 48.2 4.9 42.8Approach LOS D D A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 17: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 744 1388 290 72 710 186 116 254 52 96 196 229Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3332 1719 3322 1770 3419 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3332 1719 3322 1770 3419 1770 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 759 1416 296 78 772 202 129 282 58 109 223 260RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 21 0 0 16 0 0 0 76Lane Group Flow (vph) 759 1696 0 78 953 0 129 324 0 109 223 184Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split pt+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 5Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 38.4 61.6 6.8 30.0 14.6 14.6 10.0 10.0 48.4Effective Green, g (s) 38.4 61.6 6.8 30.0 14.6 14.6 10.0 10.0 48.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.56 0.06 0.27 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 600 1866 106 906 235 454 161 169 697v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.51 0.05 c0.29 0.07 c0.09 0.06 c0.12 0.12v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 1.26 0.91 0.74 1.05 0.55 0.71 0.68 1.32 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 35.8 21.7 50.7 40.0 44.6 45.7 48.4 50.0 19.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.30 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.36 3.22Incremental Delay, d2 132.2 8.1 22.2 43.8 2.6 5.3 9.0 173.9 0.2Delay (s) 168.0 29.7 88.3 75.7 47.2 51.0 24.9 192.0 63.0Level of Service F C F E D D C F EApproach Delay (s) 72.2 76.7 50.0 104.6Approach LOS E E D F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 75.1 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 18: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis35: University Avenue & 8th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 36

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 13 1216 17 60 1510 9 13 3 19 8 7 18Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.73 0.73 0.73Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 1308 18 71 1798 11 22 5 33 11 10 25PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 631 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.73 0.61 0.75 0.75 0.61 0.75 0.75 0.73vC, conflicting volume 1808 1326 2416 3296 663 2663 3300 904vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1356 266 571 1744 0 900 1749 109tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 96 91 90 91 95 92 83 96cM capacity (veh/h) 353 780 229 56 664 140 56 669

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 14 872 454 71 1198 610 60 45Volume Left 14 0 0 71 0 0 22 11Volume Right 0 0 18 0 0 11 33 25cSH 353 1700 1700 780 1700 1700 252 157Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.51 0.27 0.09 0.70 0.36 0.24 0.29Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 8 0 0 23 28Control Delay (s) 15.6 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 23.7 36.9Lane LOS C B C EApproach Delay (s) 0.2 0.4 23.7 36.9Approach LOS C E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 19: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 1196 22 12 1440 6 43 58 13 20 88 116Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3427 3433 1785 1640Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.94 0.71 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 190 3427 3218 1298 1594Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1300 24 13 1565 7 47 63 14 22 96 126RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 32 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1323 0 0 1585 0 0 120 0 0 212 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 82.5 82.5 82.5 28.5 28.5Effective Green, g (s) 82.5 82.5 82.5 28.5 28.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 131 2356 2212 308 379v/s Ratio Prot 0.39v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.49 0.09 c0.13v/c Ratio 0.09 0.56 0.72 0.39 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 6.3 9.5 11.5 38.4 40.2Progression Factor 2.38 2.34 0.71 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.2 3.7 5.9Delay (s) 15.5 22.7 8.4 42.1 46.1Level of Service B C A D DApproach Delay (s) 22.7 8.4 42.1 46.1Approach LOS C A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 20: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis38: Dwight Way & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 13 307 26 82 438 25 11 28 39 28 44 16Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 297 25 77 409 23 10 26 36 20 31 11

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 335 509 73 62Volume Left (vph) 13 77 10 20Volume Right (vph) 25 23 36 11Hadj (s) 0.00 0.04 -0.24 -0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.9 4.8 5.8 6.1Degree Utilization, x 0.46 0.68 0.12 0.10Capacity (veh/h) 694 735 524 513Control Delay (s) 12.1 17.2 9.6 9.8Approach Delay (s) 12.1 17.2 9.6 9.8Approach LOS B C A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 14.4HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 21: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis39: Heinz Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 40

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 15 42 17 18 74 10 22 12 25 7 11 11Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 46 18 20 80 11 24 13 27 8 12 12

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 80 111 64 32Volume Left (vph) 16 20 24 8Volume Right (vph) 18 11 27 12Hadj (s) -0.06 0.01 -0.15 -0.15Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.04Capacity (veh/h) 837 832 810 804Control Delay (s) 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.4Approach Delay (s) 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.4Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 7.7HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 19.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 22: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 108 1436 8 10 930 98 9 6 4 20 2 23Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3536 1770 3476 1767 1770 1491Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.83 0.80 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 466 3536 279 3476 1510 1490 1491Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 117 1561 9 11 1011 107 10 7 4 22 2 25RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 24 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1570 0 11 1115 0 0 17 0 22 3 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Effective Green, g (s) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.05 0.05 0.05Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 407 3086 243 3034 69 68 68v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.32 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.04 0.01 c0.01v/c Ratio 0.29 0.51 0.05 0.37 0.25 0.32 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 1.2 1.6 0.9 1.3 50.7 50.9 50.2Progression Factor 2.44 3.46 0.91 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.8 0.3Delay (s) 3.8 5.9 0.9 1.4 52.6 53.6 50.5Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 5.7 1.4 52.6 51.9Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 5.2 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 23: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis41: University Avenue & 10 Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 13 1181 25 12 1422 10 9 3 23 4 7 17Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.63 0.63 0.63Hourly flow rate (vph) 15 1342 28 13 1497 11 12 4 32 6 11 27PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 340pX, platoon unblocked 0.62 0.80 0.72 0.72 0.80 0.72 0.72 0.62vC, conflicting volume 1507 1370 2192 2918 685 2261 2927 754vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 588 964 625 1636 108 722 1648 0tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 98 94 94 96 97 83 96cM capacity (veh/h) 596 554 214 68 741 199 67 671

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 15 895 476 761 759 48 44Volume Left 15 0 0 13 0 12 6Volume Right 0 0 28 0 11 32 27cSH 596 1700 1700 554 1700 299 187Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.53 0.28 0.02 0.45 0.16 0.24Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 2 0 14 22Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 19.3 30.1Lane LOS B A C DApproach Delay (s) 0.1 0.3 19.3 30.1Approach LOS C D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 24: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis49: Addison Street WB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 50

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 6 1234 1 0 1102Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 7 1542 1 0 1238Pedestrians 60Lane Width (ft) 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0Percent Blockage 5Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 117 350pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.79 0.79vC, conflicting volume 2162 832 1544vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 675 251 1153tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 99 100cM capacity (veh/h) 298 561 461

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 7 1028 515 413 825Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 7 0 1 0 0cSH 561 1700 1700 461 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.60 0.30 0.00 0.49Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 25: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis50: Addison Street EB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 51

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 44 66 1201 1067 35Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1645 1719 3438 3422Flt Permitted 0.98 0.20 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1645 354 3438 3422Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 45 58 82 1501 1199 39RTOR Reduction (vph) 43 0 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 0 82 1501 1236 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 8.2 42.8 42.8 42.8Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 44.3 44.3 44.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.74 0.74 0.74Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 266 261 2538 2527v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.44 0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.23v/c Ratio 0.23 0.31 0.59 0.49Uniform Delay, d1 21.9 2.7 3.6 3.2Progression Factor 1.00 0.15 0.13 1.36Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 2.4 0.8 0.1Delay (s) 22.3 2.8 1.3 4.4Level of Service C A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.3 1.3 4.4Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 3.4 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 26: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis51: Allston Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 52

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 28 59 108 65 22 99 1220 23 35 979 69Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1698 1779 1719 3425 1719 3391Flt Permitted 0.86 0.75 0.21 1.00 0.12 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1477 1376 376 3425 210 3391Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 50 32 67 152 92 31 115 1419 27 36 1020 72RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 0 0 267 0 115 1444 0 36 1084 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 16 16 21Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 4 5 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 15.2 15.2 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8Effective Green, g (s) 16.7 16.7 37.3 37.3 37.3 37.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 411 383 234 2129 131 2108v/s Ratio Prot c0.42 0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.19 0.31 0.17v/c Ratio 0.24 0.70 0.49 0.68 0.27 0.51Uniform Delay, d1 16.8 19.4 6.2 7.4 5.2 6.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.10Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 5.5 7.2 1.8 4.6 0.8Delay (s) 17.1 24.8 13.4 9.2 10.7 7.8Level of Service B C B A B AApproach Delay (s) 17.1 24.8 9.5 7.9Approach LOS B C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 27: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis52: Bancroft Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 53

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 4 12 25 12 13 50 37 1289 8 24 1090 34Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 14 29 16 17 66 40 1386 9 28 1267 40PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 1319 680pX, platoon unblocked 0.76 0.76 0.85 0.76 0.76 0.69 0.85 0.69vC, conflicting volume 2190 2817 653 2196 2833 697 1307 1395vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1059 1881 243 1067 1902 0 1011 666tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.2 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 94 70 95 83 63 91 93 95cM capacity (veh/h) 81 48 645 91 46 746 565 618

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3Volume Total 48 99 40 924 471 28 845 462Volume Left 5 16 40 0 0 28 0 0Volume Right 29 66 0 0 9 0 0 40cSH 120 156 565 1700 1700 618 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.63 0.07 0.54 0.28 0.05 0.50 0.27Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 87 6 0 0 4 0 0Control Delay (s) 53.5 61.2 11.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0Lane LOS F F B BApproach Delay (s) 53.5 61.2 0.3 0.2Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 28: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis53: Channing Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 54

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 11 11 28 7 6 28 5 1281 8 1 1107 20Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 14 35 9 8 35 5 1348 8 1 1287 23PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 672pX, platoon unblocked 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66vC, conflicting volume 2025 2669 655 2051 2676 678 1310 1357vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1533 2501 655 1572 2512 0 1310 527tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.2 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 59 26 91 50 58 95 99 100cM capacity (veh/h) 34 19 409 18 18 721 508 675

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 62 52 679 683 645 667Volume Left 14 9 5 0 1 0Volume Right 35 35 0 8 0 23cSH 51 54 508 1700 675 1700Volume to Capacity 1.23 0.96 0.01 0.40 0.00 0.39Queue Length 95th (ft) 141 107 1 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 333.8 233.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS F F A AApproach Delay (s) 333.8 233.9 0.2 0.0Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 11.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 29: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis54: Dwight Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 55

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 37 266 47 101 421 103 105 1143 82 106 913 100Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1803 1770 1780 1719 3374 1719 3347Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 207 1803 609 1780 1719 3374 1719 3347Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 43 306 54 105 439 107 118 1284 92 115 992 109RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 354 0 105 537 0 118 1371 0 115 1094 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 59 32 29Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 17 9 12 12Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 10.9 53.1 9.8 52.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 11.9 54.6 10.8 53.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.50 0.10 0.49Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 71 616 208 608 186 1675 169 1628v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.30 0.07 c0.41 c0.07 0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.17v/c Ratio 0.61 0.57 0.50 0.88 0.63 0.82 0.68 0.67Uniform Delay, d1 30.0 29.7 28.8 34.1 47.0 23.5 47.9 21.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 13.7 1.3 1.9 14.3 6.9 4.6 10.7 2.2Delay (s) 43.8 31.0 30.7 48.4 53.9 28.1 58.7 23.8Level of Service D C C D D C E CApproach Delay (s) 32.3 45.6 30.1 27.1Approach LOS C D C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 5.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 30: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis55: Grayson Street & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 56

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 100 75 157 1222 891 123Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1689 1719 3438 3359Flt Permitted 0.97 0.24 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1689 441 3438 3359Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 123 93 173 1343 938 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 24 0 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 0 173 1343 1059 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 4 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.4 92.6 92.6 92.6Effective Green, g (s) 18.4 92.6 92.6 92.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.77 0.77 0.77Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 259 340 2653 2592v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.39 0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.39v/c Ratio 0.74 0.51 0.51 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 5.2 5.1 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 10.9 5.4 0.7 0.5Delay (s) 59.4 10.5 5.8 5.0Level of Service E B A AApproach Delay (s) 59.4 6.4 5.0Approach LOS E A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 31: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis56: Heinz Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 57

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 10 54 90 1368 871 67Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1562 1719 3438 3393Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1562 1719 3438 3393Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 12 68 106 1609 990 76RTOR Reduction (vph) 64 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 106 1609 1063 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type ProtProtected Phases 4 5 2 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 6.2 12.1 95.8 79.7Effective Green, g (s) 6.2 12.1 95.8 79.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.11 0.87 0.72Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 88 189 2994 2458v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.06 c0.47 0.31v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.18 0.56 0.54 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 46.4 1.7 6.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.01 0.36 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 1.8 0.3 0.6Delay (s) 50.5 48.9 0.9 6.6Level of Service D D A AApproach Delay (s) 50.5 3.9 6.6Approach LOS D A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 6.2 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 32: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 58

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 122 972 278 31 643 239 277 1098 60 127 632 166Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3289 1719 3274 1719 3408 1719 3316Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 196 3289 213 3274 1719 3408 1719 3316Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 133 1057 302 34 699 260 301 1193 65 138 687 180RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 35 0 0 4 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 133 1335 0 34 924 0 301 1254 0 138 846 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 11 5 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 2 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Parking (#/hr) 0Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 43.0 33.0 33.0 21.6 40.0 14.0 32.4Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 34.0 34.0 22.6 42.0 15.0 34.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.31 0.31 0.21 0.38 0.14 0.31Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 175 1316 66 1012 353 1301 234 1037v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.41 0.28 0.18 c0.37 0.08 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.16v/c Ratio 0.76 1.01 0.52 0.91 0.85 0.96 0.59 0.82Uniform Delay, d1 26.1 33.0 31.2 36.6 42.1 33.3 44.6 34.9Progression Factor 0.68 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Incremental Delay, d2 15.8 27.0 6.6 12.2 17.7 17.7 3.5 6.6Delay (s) 33.4 53.2 37.9 48.8 59.8 51.0 41.9 36.1Level of Service C D D D E D D DApproach Delay (s) 51.4 48.4 52.7 36.9Approach LOS D D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 48.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.6% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 33: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 9 234 0 0 517 643 158 0 1067 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 254 0 0 562 699 172 0 1160 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 562 254 555 836 127 1058 1185 630vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 562 254 555 836 127 1058 1185 630tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 99 100 58 100 0 0 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 985 1286 411 299 899 0 186 424

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1Volume Total 95 170 375 886 1332Volume Left 10 0 0 0 172Volume Right 0 0 0 699 1160cSH 985 1700 1700 1700 780Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.10 0.22 0.52 1.71Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 1889Control Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 338.6Lane LOS A FApproach Delay (s) 0.4 0.0 338.6Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 157.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 34: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: University Frontage North & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 0 0 32 19 38 12 259 0 0 144 7Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 35 21 41 13 282 0 0 157 8

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 97 295 164Volume Left (vph) 35 13 0Volume Right (vph) 41 0 8Hadj (s) -0.15 0.04 0.01Departure Headway (s) 4.8 4.4 4.5Degree Utilization, x 0.13 0.36 0.20Capacity (veh/h) 686 802 771Control Delay (s) 8.5 9.8 8.6Approach Delay (s) 8.5 9.8 8.6Approach LOS A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 9.2HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 35.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 35: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: University Frontage South & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 26 21 8 0 0 0 0 244 27 17 160 0Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 28 23 9 0 0 0 0 265 29 18 174 0

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 60 295 192Volume Left (vph) 28 0 18Volume Right (vph) 9 29 0Hadj (s) 0.04 -0.03 0.05Departure Headway (s) 5.0 4.2 4.4Degree Utilization, x 0.08 0.35 0.24Capacity (veh/h) 652 830 788Control Delay (s) 8.5 9.5 8.8Approach Delay (s) 8.5 9.5 8.8Approach LOS A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 9.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 32.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 36: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Addison Street & 4th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 44 66 80 10 38 74 47 220 22 30 185 5Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 72 87 11 41 80 51 239 24 33 201 5

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 207 133 314 239Volume Left (vph) 48 11 51 33Volume Right (vph) 87 80 24 5Hadj (s) -0.17 -0.31 0.02 0.05Departure Headway (s) 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.4Degree Utilization, x 0.31 0.20 0.46 0.36Capacity (veh/h) 594 575 637 618Control Delay (s) 10.9 9.8 12.7 11.4Approach Delay (s) 10.9 9.8 12.7 11.4Approach LOS B A B B

Intersection SummaryDelay 11.5HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 37: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 139 1432 361 93 1212 58 514 441 114 119 241 511Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3319 1719 3438 1344 3433 1788 1770 1863 1513Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3319 1719 3438 1344 3433 1788 467 1863 1513Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 149 1540 388 100 1303 62 541 464 120 134 271 574RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 0 13 0 7 0 0 0 126Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 1911 0 100 1303 49 541 577 0 134 271 448Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 4Permitted Phases 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 58.0 7.0 52.4 52.4 15.0 51.0 32.0 32.0 32.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 58.0 7.0 52.4 52.4 15.0 51.0 32.0 32.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.45 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.12 0.39 0.25 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 167 1481 93 1386 542 396 701 115 459 372v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.58 0.06 c0.38 c0.16 0.32 0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.29 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.89 1.29 1.08 0.94 0.09 1.37 0.82 1.17 0.59 1.20Uniform Delay, d1 58.0 36.0 61.5 37.3 24.0 57.5 35.4 49.0 43.2 49.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.14 1.00 0.99 1.02Incremental Delay, d2 40.2 135.8 115.2 13.6 0.3 172.8 4.0 124.7 1.6 110.3Delay (s) 98.2 171.8 176.7 50.9 24.4 227.5 44.3 173.7 44.4 160.3Level of Service F F F D C F D F D FApproach Delay (s) 166.5 58.3 132.4 130.1Approach LOS F E F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 125.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 38: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 0 81 0 0 43 38 956 43 24 587 96Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 88 0 0 47 41 1039 47 26 638 104PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 550 479pX, platoon unblocked 0.62 0.62 0.87 0.62 0.62 0.56 0.87 0.56vC, conflicting volume 1934 1911 690 1976 1940 1062 742 1086vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1734 1696 571 1800 1743 717 631 759tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 81 100 100 81 95 95cM capacity (veh/h) 32 52 454 29 48 240 830 476

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 88 47 1127 768Volume Left 0 0 41 26Volume Right 88 47 47 104cSH 454 240 830 476Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.05Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 18 4 4Control Delay (s) 14.8 23.6 1.6 1.7Lane LOS B C A AApproach Delay (s) 14.8 23.6 1.6 1.7Approach LOS B C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 39: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 239 142 131 36 96 37 63 743 28 39 542 78Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1773 1770 1850 1770 1815Flt Permitted 0.77 0.86 0.20 1.00 0.13 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1371 1545 377 1850 239 1815Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 260 154 142 39 104 40 68 808 30 42 589 85RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 15 0 0 2 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 537 0 0 168 0 68 836 0 42 666 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 24.8 24.8 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2Effective Green, g (s) 24.8 24.8 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 523 589 181 888 115 871v/s Ratio Prot c0.45 0.37v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.11 0.18 0.18v/c Ratio 1.03 0.28 0.38 0.94 0.37 0.76Uniform Delay, d1 20.1 13.9 10.7 16.0 10.7 13.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.86Incremental Delay, d2 46.3 0.3 5.9 18.9 4.2 3.1Delay (s) 66.4 14.2 16.6 35.0 13.9 15.0Level of Service E B B C B BApproach Delay (s) 66.4 14.2 33.6 15.0Approach LOS E B C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 34.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 40: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis26: University Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 26

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 7 1655 25 14 1318 29 22 6 23 3 4 10Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.71 0.71 0.71Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 1706 26 16 1515 33 38 10 40 4 6 14PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 300 660pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.56 0.67 0.67 0.56 0.67 0.67 0.78vC, conflicting volume 1548 1732 2540 3314 866 2476 3310 774vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1146 742 857 2012 0 761 2006 158tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 97 73 72 93 97 85 98cM capacity (veh/h) 461 473 140 37 609 140 37 673

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 860 879 774 791 88 24Volume Left 7 0 16 0 38 4Volume Right 0 26 0 33 40 14cSH 461 1700 473 1700 143 119Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.52 0.03 0.47 0.61 0.20Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 3 0 81 18Control Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 63.7 42.9Lane LOS A A F EApproach Delay (s) 0.3 0.5 63.7 42.9Approach LOS F E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 41: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBR2 SELLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 158 135 182 50 195 58 618 0 281 0 99Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1792 1583 1681 1681 1583 1770Flt Permitted 0.70 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1792 1583 1681 1761 1583 1770Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 1 193 165 253 69 212 71 672 0 343 0 108RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 325 0 0 322 212 64 0 679 124 0 108Turn Type Perm Split Perm Prot Prot custom customProtected Phases 2 6 6 3 8 7Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 19.4 19.4 4.0 29.0 29.0 5.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 19.4 19.4 4.0 29.0 29.0 5.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.06Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 398 351 77 584 525 101v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.04 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.13 c0.39 0.08v/c Ratio 1.29 0.81 0.60 0.83 1.16 0.24 1.07Uniform Delay, d1 34.7 32.2 30.5 41.4 29.2 21.2 41.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 158.7 11.5 2.9 50.4 90.9 1.1 109.5Delay (s) 193.4 43.7 33.5 91.7 120.1 22.2 150.7Level of Service F D C F F C FApproach Delay (s) 193.4 39.7 87.5 62.3Approach LOS F D F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 86.6 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.4 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.0% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 42: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 28

Movement SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 439 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00Frt 0.85Flt Protected 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1583Flt Permitted 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 477 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 478 0Turn Type customProtected Phases 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 543v/s Ratio Prot 0.30v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 27.0Progression Factor 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.3Delay (s) 42.3Level of Service DApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 43: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis28: Parker Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 29

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 19 13 49 57 2 50 15 888 35 19 734 3Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1703 1770 1852 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.15 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1810 1583 1703 289 1852 176 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84Adj. Flow (vph) 27 19 70 83 3 72 18 1070 42 23 874 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 63 0 48 0 0 2 0 0 0 1Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 46 7 0 110 0 18 1110 0 23 874 3Turn Type Split Prot Split Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 2 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 7.5 7.5 10.1 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 7.5 10.1 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 193 168 244 174 1114 106 1120 952v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.06 c0.60 0.47v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.13 0.00v/c Ratio 0.24 0.04 0.45 0.10 1.00 0.22 0.78 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 28.9 28.3 27.7 6.0 14.0 6.4 10.6 5.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.5 1.3 0.3 26.0 1.0 3.6 0.0Delay (s) 31.8 28.8 29.0 6.2 40.0 7.5 14.1 5.6Level of Service C C C A D A B AApproach Delay (s) 30.0 29.0 39.4 13.9Approach LOS C C D B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.5 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 44: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis29: Grayson Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 30

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 33 66 54 7 13 8 896 49 20 859 6Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.98 0.99 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1708 1755 1849 1859Flt Permitted 0.94 0.55 0.99 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 1616 992 1836 1802Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 32 59 118 67 9 16 9 1030 56 24 1011 7RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 86 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 79 0 0 1093 0 0 1042 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 10.1 39.8 39.8Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 10.1 39.8 39.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.69 0.69Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 173 1262 1239v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.08 c0.60 0.58v/c Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.87 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 21.4 21.4 7.0 6.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 1.9 6.5 5.3Delay (s) 22.4 23.3 13.4 12.0Level of Service C C B BApproach Delay (s) 22.4 23.3 13.4 12.0Approach LOS C C B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 57.9 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 45: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Heinz Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 31

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 78 52 183 134 17 43 64 788 67 43 984 21Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1695 1747 1770 1841 1770 1857Flt Permitted 0.87 0.49 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1485 882 201 1841 210 1857Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Adj. Flow (vph) 93 62 218 213 27 68 69 847 72 50 1144 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 55 0 0 16 0 0 5 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 318 0 0 292 0 69 914 0 50 1167 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 19.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 441 262 116 1064 121 1074v/s Ratio Prot 0.50 c0.63v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 c0.33 0.34 0.24v/c Ratio 0.72 1.11 0.59 0.86 0.41 1.09Uniform Delay, d1 20.1 22.5 8.7 11.3 7.5 13.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.8 89.6 7.9 7.1 2.3 54.0Delay (s) 29.9 112.1 16.6 18.4 9.8 67.5Level of Service C F B B A EApproach Delay (s) 29.9 112.1 18.3 65.2Approach LOS C F B E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 46: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 8 193 78 7 34 50 809 71 42 1163 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.99Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1784 1528 1781 1534 3466 5001Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1015 1528 1125 1534 3466 5001Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 88 12 292 111 10 49 56 899 79 53 1472 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 251 0 0 42 0 6 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 41 0 121 7 0 1028 0 0 1645 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 41.5 41.2Effective Green, g (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 41.5 41.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.38 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 213 156 213 1308 1873v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.03 c0.11 0.00v/c Ratio 0.71 0.19 0.78 0.03 0.79 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 45.2 41.9 45.7 40.9 30.3 32.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.1 0.4 21.1 0.1 0.5 5.0Delay (s) 60.3 42.3 66.8 41.0 7.1 37.1Level of Service E D E D A DApproach Delay (s) 46.9 59.3 7.1 37.1Approach LOS D E A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 47: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 381 687 166 119 1130 97 250 452 116 253 290 890Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3318 1719 3394 1770 3398 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3318 1719 3394 1770 3398 1770 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 389 701 169 129 1228 105 278 502 129 288 330 1011RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 6 0 0 21 0 0 0 19Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 851 0 129 1327 0 278 610 0 288 330 992Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split pt+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 5Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 15.0 40.4 10.6 36.0 16.0 16.0 26.0 26.0 41.0Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 40.4 10.6 36.0 16.0 16.0 26.0 26.0 41.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.37 0.10 0.33 0.15 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 234 1219 166 1111 257 494 418 440 590v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 0.26 0.08 c0.39 0.16 c0.18 0.16 0.18 c0.63v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 1.66 0.70 0.78 1.19 1.08 1.24 0.69 0.75 1.68Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 29.6 48.5 37.0 47.0 47.0 38.3 39.0 34.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 1.38Incremental Delay, d2 316.3 3.3 18.3 95.6 79.6 122.6 2.6 3.9 310.8Delay (s) 363.8 32.9 64.6 123.8 126.6 169.6 17.9 19.7 358.4Level of Service F C E F F F B B FApproach Delay (s) 135.2 118.6 156.5 229.6Approach LOS F F F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 163.5 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 48: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis35: University Avenue & 8th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 36

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 28 1632 24 33 1322 23 15 10 23 6 5 21Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.73 0.73 0.73Hourly flow rate (vph) 30 1755 26 39 1574 27 26 17 40 8 7 29PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 631 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.57 0.68 0.68 0.57 0.68 0.68 0.78vC, conflicting volume 1601 1781 2726 3508 890 2652 3507 801vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1196 864 1119 2264 0 1011 2262 163tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 91 64 26 94 81 71 96cM capacity (veh/h) 436 431 72 23 619 44 23 661

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 30 1170 611 39 1049 552 83 44Volume Left 30 0 0 39 0 0 26 8Volume Right 0 0 26 0 0 27 40 29cSH 436 1700 1700 431 1700 1700 71 84Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.69 0.36 0.09 0.62 0.32 1.16 0.52Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 7 0 0 158 57Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 258.5 87.9Lane LOS B B F FApproach Delay (s) 0.2 0.3 258.5 87.9Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 49: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1642 15 14 1302 10 38 37 29 12 43 38Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3433 3429 1723 1681Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.91 0.87 0.96Satd. Flow (perm) 245 3433 3139 1523 1629Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1785 16 15 1415 11 41 40 32 13 47 41RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 21 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1800 0 0 1441 0 0 101 0 0 80 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 170 2389 2184 349 373v/s Ratio Prot c0.52v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.46 c0.07 0.05v/c Ratio 0.15 0.75 0.66 0.29 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 6.2 11.7 10.3 38.2 37.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 2.3 1.6 2.1 1.3Delay (s) 8.1 13.9 11.8 40.3 38.8Level of Service A B B D DApproach Delay (s) 13.8 11.8 40.3 38.8Approach LOS B B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 50: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis38: Dwight Way & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 39

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 23 510 14 42 482 49 28 60 76 22 29 12Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 493 14 39 451 46 26 56 71 16 20 8

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 529 536 153 45Volume Left (vph) 22 39 26 16Volume Right (vph) 14 46 71 8Hadj (s) 0.03 0.00 -0.21 -0.01Departure Headway (s) 5.4 5.4 6.5 7.2Degree Utilization, x 0.80 0.80 0.28 0.09Capacity (veh/h) 646 649 505 442Control Delay (s) 26.4 26.6 12.1 10.9Approach Delay (s) 26.4 26.6 12.1 10.9Approach LOS D D B B

Intersection SummaryDelay 24.2HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 51: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis39: Heinz Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 40

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 13 96 63 74 61 14 49 30 80 14 56 29Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 104 68 80 66 15 53 33 87 15 61 32

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 187 162 173 108Volume Left (vph) 14 80 53 15Volume Right (vph) 68 15 87 32Hadj (s) -0.17 0.08 -0.21 -0.11Departure Headway (s) 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.9Degree Utilization, x 0.24 0.22 0.23 0.15Capacity (veh/h) 720 683 711 671Control Delay (s) 9.1 9.3 9.1 8.7Approach Delay (s) 9.1 9.3 9.1 8.7Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 9.1HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 52: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 944 14 32 1168 99 18 7 18 138 4 119Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 1770 3488 1710 1770 1525Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.86 0.77 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 311 3532 474 3488 1505 1437 1525Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 55 1026 15 35 1270 108 20 8 20 150 4 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 17 0 0 68 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 1040 0 35 1374 0 0 31 0 150 65 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 84.1 84.1 84.1 84.1 16.9 16.9 16.9Effective Green, g (s) 84.1 84.1 84.1 84.1 16.9 16.9 16.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.15 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 238 2700 362 2667 231 221 234v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 c0.39 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.07 0.02 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.23 0.39 0.10 0.52 0.13 0.68 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 3.7 4.3 3.3 5.0 40.2 44.0 41.2Progression Factor 0.47 0.47 2.02 2.32 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 8.0 0.7Delay (s) 3.1 2.3 6.7 11.8 40.5 52.0 41.8Level of Service A A A B D D DApproach Delay (s) 2.3 11.6 40.5 47.2Approach LOS A B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 53: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis41: University Avenue & 10 Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 42

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 15 1650 24 12 1282 22 17 15 44 3 3 14Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.63 0.63 0.63Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 1875 27 13 1349 23 23 21 60 5 5 22PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 340pX, platoon unblocked 0.63 0.64 0.81 0.81 0.64 0.81 0.81 0.63vC, conflicting volume 1373 1902 2647 3321 951 2428 3323 686vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 430 1290 582 1411 0 313 1414 0tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 96 92 80 91 99 95 97cM capacity (veh/h) 700 332 286 104 696 370 104 687

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 17 1250 652 687 698 104 32Volume Left 17 0 0 13 0 23 5Volume Right 0 0 27 0 23 60 22cSH 700 1700 1700 332 1700 286 349Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.74 0.38 0.04 0.41 0.36 0.09Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 3 0 40 7Control Delay (s) 10.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 24.7 16.3Lane LOS B A C CApproach Delay (s) 0.1 0.6 24.7 16.3Approach LOS C C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 54: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis49: Addison Street WB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 50

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 5 1211 20 0 1542Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 5 1514 25 0 1733Pedestrians 60Lane Width (ft) 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0Percent Blockage 5Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 117 350pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 0.79 0.79vC, conflicting volume 2393 829 1539vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1149 260 1156tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 99 100cM capacity (veh/h) 160 556 462

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 5 1009 530 578 1155Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 5 0 25 0 0cSH 556 1700 1700 462 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.59 0.31 0.00 0.68Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 55: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis50: Addison Street EB & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 51

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 69 72 1185 1485 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1637 1719 3438 3419Flt Permitted 0.98 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1637 171 3438 3419Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 61 91 90 1481 1669 64RTOR Reduction (vph) 16 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 0 90 1481 1730 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 8 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 46.3 46.3 46.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.2 47.8 47.8 47.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.74 0.74 0.74Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 126 2528 2514v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.43 0.51v/s Ratio Perm c0.52v/c Ratio 0.48 0.71 0.59 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 24.3 4.8 4.0 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.67 0.43 3.30Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 25.2 0.8 0.1Delay (s) 25.6 28.4 2.6 15.3Level of Service C C A BApproach Delay (s) 25.6 4.0 15.3Approach LOS C A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 56: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis51: Allston Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 52

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 68 75 55 89 20 70 1162 44 48 1549 19Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1721 1795 1719 3413 1719 3429Flt Permitted 0.87 0.80 0.09 1.00 0.14 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1522 1461 168 3413 249 3429Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 52 77 85 77 125 28 81 1351 51 50 1614 20RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 198 0 0 221 0 81 1399 0 50 1633 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 16 16 21Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 4 5 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 14.3 14.3 41.7 41.7 41.7 41.7Effective Green, g (s) 15.8 15.8 43.2 43.2 43.2 43.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 370 355 112 2268 165 2279v/s Ratio Prot 0.41 0.48v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.15 c0.48 0.20v/c Ratio 0.54 0.62 0.72 0.62 0.30 0.72Uniform Delay, d1 21.4 21.9 7.0 6.2 4.6 7.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.16Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 3.4 33.2 1.3 3.6 1.5Delay (s) 22.9 25.3 40.2 7.5 9.3 9.6Level of Service C C D A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.9 25.3 9.3 9.6Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 57: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis52: Bancroft Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 53

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 14 16 15 14 52 39 1250 22 43 1613 19Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 16 19 20 18 68 42 1344 24 50 1876 22PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 1319 680pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 0.83 0.66 0.83 0.83 0.68 0.66 0.68vC, conflicting volume 2820 3438 949 2505 3437 684 1898 1368vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1024 1772 0 642 1771 0 1342 589tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.2 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 96 70 97 90 66 91 87 92cM capacity (veh/h) 90 55 721 190 55 734 328 651

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3Volume Total 39 107 42 896 472 50 1250 647Volume Left 4 20 42 0 0 50 0 0Volume Right 19 68 0 0 24 0 0 22cSH 106 200 328 1700 1700 651 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.37 0.53 0.13 0.53 0.28 0.08 0.74 0.38Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 69 11 0 0 6 0 0Control Delay (s) 57.3 41.9 17.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS F E C BApproach Delay (s) 57.3 41.9 0.5 0.3Approach LOS F E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 58: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis53: Channing Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 54

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 11 5 47 3 3 17 11 1339 18 7 1619 21Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 6 59 4 4 22 12 1409 19 8 1883 24PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 672pX, platoon unblocked 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63vC, conflicting volume 2662 3363 953 2462 3365 714 1907 1428vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 2460 3579 953 2140 3584 0 1907 489tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.2 4.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 0 0 77 0 0 97 96 99cM capacity (veh/h) 0 3 259 0 3 679 296 657

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 79 29 716 724 949 966Volume Left 14 4 12 0 8 0Volume Right 59 22 0 19 0 24cSH 0 0 296 1700 657 1700Volume to Capacity Err Err 0.04 0.43 0.01 0.57Queue Length 95th (ft) Err Err 3 0 1 0Control Delay (s) Err Err 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0Lane LOS F F A AApproach Delay (s) Err Err 0.7 0.2Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay ErrIntersection Capacity Utilization 62.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 59: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis54: Dwight Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 55

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 89 479 107 133 464 188 163 1071 159 151 1489 29Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1790 1770 1742 1719 3314 1719 3420Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 233 1790 241 1742 1719 3314 1719 3420Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 102 551 123 139 483 196 183 1203 179 164 1618 32RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 102 667 0 139 666 0 183 1371 0 164 1649 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 59 32 29Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 17 9 12 12Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 8.0 43.5 8.0 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 9.0 45.0 9.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.41 0.08 0.41Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 104 797 107 776 141 1356 141 1399v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 0.38 c0.11 0.41 0.10 c0.48v/s Ratio Perm 0.44 c0.58v/c Ratio 0.98 0.84 1.30 0.86 1.30 1.01 1.16 1.18Uniform Delay, d1 30.0 27.0 30.5 27.4 50.5 32.5 50.5 32.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.15 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 81.8 7.6 187.1 9.3 170.8 25.3 126.3 88.1Delay (s) 111.8 34.6 217.6 36.7 211.5 62.6 176.8 120.6Level of Service F C F D F E F FApproach Delay (s) 44.7 67.4 80.0 125.7Approach LOS D E E F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 89.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 60: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis55: Grayson Street & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 56

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 150 98 1249 1601 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1660 1719 3438 3396Flt Permitted 0.98 0.09 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1660 154 3438 3396Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 132 185 108 1373 1685 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 43 0 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 0 108 1373 1796 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type PermProtected Phases 4 2 6Permitted Phases 2Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 82.0 82.0 82.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 82.0 82.0 82.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.75 0.75 0.75Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 287 115 2563 2532v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.40 0.53v/s Ratio Perm c0.70v/c Ratio 0.95 0.94 0.54 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 11.9 5.9 7.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.23 0.10 0.54Incremental Delay, d2 40.6 62.9 0.7 0.2Delay (s) 85.7 77.5 1.3 4.2Level of Service F E A AApproach Delay (s) 85.7 6.8 4.2Approach LOS F A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 61: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis56: Heinz Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 57

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 132 73 1280 1847 37Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1572 1719 3438 3426Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1572 1719 3438 3426Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 32 165 86 1506 2099 42RTOR Reduction (vph) 108 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 0 86 1506 2140 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type ProtProtected Phases 4 5 2 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 11.0 9.1 91.0 77.9Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 9.1 91.0 77.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.08 0.83 0.71Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 142 2844 2426v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.05 c0.44 c0.62v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.57 0.61 0.53 0.88Uniform Delay, d1 47.2 48.7 2.9 12.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.21 0.82 0.85Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 2.4 0.2 3.9Delay (s) 51.9 61.3 2.6 14.5Level of Service D E A BApproach Delay (s) 51.9 5.8 14.5Approach LOS D A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 62: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 58

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 277 734 112 9 705 146 372 930 87 316 1433 169Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3348 1719 3334 1719 3388 1719 3376Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 259 3348 290 3334 1719 3388 1719 3376Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 301 798 122 10 766 159 404 1011 95 343 1558 184RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 16 0 0 6 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 909 0 10 909 0 404 1100 0 343 1734 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 11 5 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 2 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Parking (#/hr) 0Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 19.0 41.0 21.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 36.0 25.0 25.0 20.0 43.0 22.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.39 0.20 0.41Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 1096 66 758 313 1324 344 1381v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.27 0.27 c0.24 0.32 0.20 c0.51v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.03v/c Ratio 1.58 0.83 0.15 1.20 1.29 0.83 1.00 1.26Uniform Delay, d1 33.4 34.2 34.0 42.5 45.0 30.2 44.0 32.5Progression Factor 0.82 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94Incremental Delay, d2 281.6 5.0 1.1 102.1 152.7 6.2 32.6 117.9Delay (s) 309.0 33.9 35.1 144.6 197.7 36.4 75.7 148.4Level of Service F C D F F D E FApproach Delay (s) 101.7 143.4 79.5 136.4Approach LOS F F E F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 115.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.7% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 63: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 22 238 0 0 407 644 80 0 1055 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 24 259 0 0 442 700 87 0 1147 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 442 259 528 749 129 970 1099 571vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 442 259 528 749 129 970 1099 571tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 80 100 0 0 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1093 1281 426 332 896 0 207 464

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1Volume Total 110 172 295 847 1234Volume Left 24 0 0 0 87Volume Right 0 0 0 700 1147cSH 1093 1700 1700 1700 832Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.50 1.48Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 1455Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 239.3Lane LOS A FApproach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 239.3Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 111.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 64: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 259 1678 340 98 1141 86 486 230 91 124 267 580Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3338 1719 3438 1355 3433 1761 1770 1863 1517Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3338 1719 3438 1355 3433 1761 1038 1863 1517Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 278 1804 366 105 1227 92 512 242 96 139 300 652RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 21 0 12 0 0 0 210Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 2156 0 105 1227 71 512 326 0 139 300 442Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 4Permitted Phases 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 56.0 7.0 44.9 44.9 12.0 43.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 56.0 7.0 44.9 44.9 12.0 43.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.47 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.36 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 259 1558 100 1286 507 343 631 234 419 341v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.65 0.06 c0.36 c0.15 0.18 0.16v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.13 c0.29v/c Ratio 1.07 1.38 1.05 0.95 0.14 1.49 0.52 0.59 0.72 1.30Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 32.0 56.5 36.5 24.8 54.0 30.3 41.6 43.0 46.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.22 0.73 0.81 1.00 1.04 1.01 1.01 1.01Incremental Delay, d2 76.7 176.7 80.7 10.6 0.3 235.9 0.7 3.5 5.0 151.0Delay (s) 127.7 208.7 149.8 37.3 20.4 290.2 32.1 45.5 48.2 197.9Level of Service F F F D C F C D D FApproach Delay (s) 199.5 44.5 187.5 137.3Approach LOS F D F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 148.1 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 65: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 0 93 0 0 76 39 601 15 49 528 102Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 101 0 0 83 42 653 16 53 574 111PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 550 479pX, platoon unblocked 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.84 0.85 0.84vC, conflicting volume 1565 1490 629 1583 1538 661 685 670vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1212 1130 481 1232 1182 503 546 513tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 80 100 100 83 95 94cM capacity (veh/h) 110 166 500 103 155 478 874 885

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 101 83 712 738Volume Left 0 0 42 53Volume Right 101 83 16 111cSH 500 478 874 885Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.17 0.05 0.06Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 15 4 5Control Delay (s) 14.0 14.1 1.3 1.5Lane LOS B B A AApproach Delay (s) 14.0 14.1 1.3 1.5Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 66: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 133 51 33 18 63 36 37 483 12 55 467 86Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 1750 1770 1854 1770 1805Flt Permitted 0.77 0.94 0.35 1.00 0.40 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1400 1662 658 1854 738 1805Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 145 55 36 20 68 39 40 525 13 60 508 93RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 29 0 0 1 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 224 0 0 98 0 40 537 0 60 592 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 14.1 14.1 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9Effective Green, g (s) 14.1 14.1 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 329 391 405 1140 454 1110v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.06 0.06 0.08v/c Ratio 0.68 0.25 0.10 0.47 0.13 0.53Uniform Delay, d1 20.9 18.7 4.7 6.3 4.8 6.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.88Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.3 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.8Delay (s) 26.6 19.0 5.2 7.7 4.8 6.6Level of Service C B A A A AApproach Delay (s) 26.6 19.0 7.5 6.4Approach LOS C B A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 67: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 14 6 54 18 23 126 31 561 15 37 568 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 1519 1823 1516 3510 5062Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1450 1519 1587 1516 3510 5062Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 21 9 82 26 33 180 34 623 17 47 719 6RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 75 0 0 164 0 1 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 30 7 0 59 16 0 673 0 0 771 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 60.4 23.4Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 60.4 23.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.58 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 127 133 139 133 2019 1128v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.04 0.01v/c Ratio 0.24 0.05 0.42 0.12 0.33 0.68Uniform Delay, d1 44.6 43.9 45.4 44.2 11.7 37.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.3 1.7Delay (s) 45.6 44.1 47.5 44.6 3.8 39.1Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 44.5 45.3 3.8 39.1Approach LOS D D A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 27.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 68: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 297 790 182 132 982 87 137 257 68 102 176 356Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3323 1719 3392 1770 3393 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3323 1719 3392 1770 3393 1770 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 303 806 186 143 1067 95 152 286 76 116 200 405RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 6 0 0 23 0 0 0 71Lane Group Flow (vph) 303 974 0 143 1156 0 152 339 0 116 200 334Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split pt+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 5Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 20.2 47.3 13.3 40.4 14.6 14.6 12.8 12.8 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 20.2 47.3 13.3 40.4 14.6 14.6 12.8 12.8 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.45 0.13 0.38 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.31Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 331 1497 218 1305 246 472 216 227 498v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.29 0.08 c0.34 0.09 c0.10 0.07 c0.11 0.21v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.92 0.65 0.66 0.89 0.62 0.72 0.54 0.88 0.67Uniform Delay, d1 41.6 22.4 43.7 30.1 42.6 43.2 43.3 45.4 31.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.23 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.28 0.30 1.34Incremental Delay, d2 28.7 2.2 6.3 8.4 4.6 5.2 2.3 27.7 3.2Delay (s) 70.3 24.6 59.9 23.4 47.1 48.4 14.4 41.2 45.2Level of Service E C E C D D B D DApproach Delay (s) 35.3 27.4 48.0 39.1Approach LOS D C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 69: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 1794 70 27 1395 36 30 39 59 21 45 31Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3415 3413 1667 1709Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.77 0.91 0.92Satd. Flow (perm) 195 3415 2638 1541 1593Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 1950 76 29 1516 39 33 42 64 23 49 34RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 19 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 2024 0 0 1582 0 0 121 0 0 92 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 83.5 83.5 83.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 136 2376 1836 353 365v/s Ratio Prot 0.59v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 c0.60 c0.08 0.06v/c Ratio 0.35 0.85 0.86 0.34 0.25Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 13.6 13.9 38.7 37.8Progression Factor 1.56 1.55 1.04 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.5 2.6 1.7Delay (s) 12.1 21.5 15.0 41.3 39.5Level of Service B C B D DApproach Delay (s) 21.3 15.0 41.3 39.5Approach LOS C B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 19.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 70: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 50 895 15 22 1078 122 12 8 24 100 9 101Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3531 1770 3473 1689 1770 1541Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.91 0.79 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 352 3531 513 3473 1558 1467 1541Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 54 973 16 24 1172 133 13 9 26 109 10 110RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 23 0 0 87 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 988 0 24 1300 0 0 25 0 109 33 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 13.2 13.2 13.2Effective Green, g (s) 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 13.2 13.2 13.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.13 0.13 0.13Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 2784 405 2739 196 184 194v/s Ratio Prot 0.28 c0.37 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.05 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.19 0.36 0.06 0.47 0.13 0.59 0.17Uniform Delay, d1 2.8 3.3 2.5 3.8 40.8 43.4 41.0Progression Factor 0.33 0.34 2.30 3.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 5.0 0.4Delay (s) 2.2 1.4 5.7 11.9 41.1 48.4 41.4Level of Service A A A B D D DApproach Delay (s) 1.4 11.8 41.1 44.7Approach LOS A B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 71: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis48: University Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 49

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 132 1594 107 629 1046 166 325 730 184 225 820 121Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.2Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3351 1719 3232 1719 3223 1719 3324Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3351 1719 3232 1719 3223 1719 3324Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.80 0.80 0.80Adj. Flow (vph) 155 1875 126 662 1101 175 378 849 214 281 1025 151RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 10 0 0 18 0 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 155 1997 0 662 1266 0 378 1045 0 281 1166 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 162 191 98 66Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 3 16 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 12.0 38.0 21.0 47.0 17.0 32.0 13.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 38.0 21.0 47.0 17.0 31.8 13.0 27.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.32 0.18 0.39 0.14 0.27 0.11 0.23Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1061 301 1266 244 854 186 770v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.60 c0.39 0.39 c0.22 c0.32 0.16 c0.35v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.90 1.88 2.20 1.00 1.55 1.22 1.51 1.51Uniform Delay, d1 53.4 41.0 49.5 36.5 51.5 44.1 53.5 46.1Progression Factor 0.82 1.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 28.9 399.1 550.5 25.2 266.4 110.9 255.6 238.1Delay (s) 72.8 452.8 600.0 61.7 317.9 155.2 309.1 284.2Level of Service E F F E F F F FApproach Delay (s) 425.5 245.6 197.9 289.0Approach LOS F F F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 300.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 141.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 72: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: University Avenue & I-80 WB On Ramp Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 60 359 0 0 442 642 128 0 1009 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 65 390 0 0 480 698 139 0 1097 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 480 390 761 1001 195 1155 1350 589vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 480 390 761 1001 195 1155 1350 589tC, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 94 100 50 100 0 0 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1057 1144 281 226 813 0 140 451

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1Volume Total 195 260 320 858 1236Volume Left 65 0 0 0 139Volume Right 0 0 0 698 1097cSH 1057 1700 1700 1700 670Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.15 0.19 0.50 1.84Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 0 1919Control Delay (s) 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 401.5Lane LOS A FApproach Delay (s) 1.4 0.0 401.5Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 173.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 124.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 73: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 234 1582 339 113 1335 66 327 170 101 156 226 552Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3334 1719 3438 1344 3433 1729 1770 1863 1513Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3334 1719 3438 1344 3433 1729 1090 1863 1513Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 252 1701 365 122 1435 71 344 179 106 175 254 620RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 0 0 189Lane Group Flow (vph) 252 2052 0 122 1435 58 344 269 0 175 254 431Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 4Permitted Phases 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 68.0 7.0 56.8 56.8 10.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 68.0 7.0 56.8 56.8 10.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.52 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.32 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 1744 93 1502 587 264 545 226 387 314v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.62 c0.07 0.42 c0.10 0.16 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.16 c0.28v/c Ratio 1.05 1.18 1.31 0.96 0.10 1.30 0.49 0.77 0.66 1.37Uniform Delay, d1 55.9 31.0 61.5 35.4 21.5 60.0 36.1 48.6 47.2 51.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.68 0.34 1.03 0.99 1.02 1.02 1.02Incremental Delay, d2 70.4 85.9 184.6 11.6 0.2 160.0 0.7 14.1 3.7 184.8Delay (s) 126.3 116.9 246.5 35.8 7.6 221.8 36.2 63.5 51.7 237.3Level of Service F F F D A F D E D FApproach Delay (s) 117.9 50.3 137.7 163.4Approach LOS F D F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 109.0 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 74: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Addison Street & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 0 77 0 0 62 36 552 13 34 449 108Sign Control Stop Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 84 0 0 67 39 600 14 37 488 117PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 550 479pX, platoon unblocked 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89vC, conflicting volume 1373 1313 547 1390 1365 607 605 614vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1095 1031 425 1112 1085 491 491 499tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 85 100 100 87 96 96cM capacity (veh/h) 147 202 558 140 188 511 951 943

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 84 67 653 642Volume Left 0 0 39 37Volume Right 84 67 14 117cSH 558 511 951 943Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.13 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 11 3 3Control Delay (s) 12.6 13.1 1.1 1.0Lane LOS B B A AApproach Delay (s) 12.6 13.1 1.1 1.0Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 75: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Allston Way & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 25

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 147 35 29 13 48 40 34 411 15 32 422 75Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1724 1770 1850 1770 1806Flt Permitted 0.77 0.95 0.39 1.00 0.45 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1391 1650 734 1850 835 1806Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 160 38 32 14 52 43 37 447 16 35 459 82RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 33 0 0 2 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 220 0 0 76 0 37 461 0 35 533 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 9 12 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 12 3 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 40.6 40.6 40.6 40.6Effective Green, g (s) 15.4 15.4 40.6 40.6 40.6 40.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 330 391 458 1156 522 1128v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 c0.30v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.05 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.67 0.19 0.08 0.40 0.07 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 22.5 19.8 4.8 6.1 4.8 6.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.37Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.7Delay (s) 27.5 20.1 5.2 7.1 6.1 9.6Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 27.5 20.1 7.0 9.4Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 76: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Potter Street & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 32

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 25 18 63 15 13 150 48 557 8 35 702 22Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1521 1815 1519 3515 5045Flt Permitted 0.80 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1485 1521 1537 1519 3515 5045Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79Adj. Flow (vph) 38 27 95 21 19 214 53 619 9 44 889 28RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 65 9 0 40 20 0 681 0 0 958 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 15 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 12 20Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Split SplitProtected Phases 2 6 8 8 7 7Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 55.3 27.9Effective Green, g (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 55.3 27.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.53 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 142 143 142 1851 1341v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.01 0.03 0.01v/c Ratio 0.47 0.06 0.28 0.14 0.37 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 43.4 44.3 43.7 14.6 34.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.3 1.8Delay (s) 47.6 43.6 45.4 44.2 5.4 36.8Level of Service D D D D A DApproach Delay (s) 45.2 44.4 5.4 36.8Approach LOS D D A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 77: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 33

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 288 731 150 110 993 88 104 248 76 113 222 394Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3333 1719 3392 1770 3377 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3333 1719 3392 1770 3377 1770 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 294 746 153 120 1079 96 116 276 84 128 252 448RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 6 0 0 28 0 0 0 89Lane Group Flow (vph) 294 884 0 120 1169 0 116 332 0 128 252 359Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split pt+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 5Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 19.6 45.6 12.1 38.1 14.5 14.5 15.8 15.8 35.4Effective Green, g (s) 19.6 45.6 12.1 38.1 14.5 14.5 15.8 15.8 35.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.43 0.12 0.36 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 1447 198 1231 244 466 266 280 534v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.27 0.07 c0.34 0.07 c0.10 0.07 c0.14 0.23v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.92 0.61 0.61 0.95 0.48 0.71 0.48 0.90 0.67Uniform Delay, d1 41.9 22.9 44.2 32.5 41.7 43.3 40.8 43.8 29.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 0.32 1.52Incremental Delay, d2 29.4 1.9 5.2 16.1 1.5 5.1 1.1 25.6 2.8Delay (s) 71.3 24.8 49.3 48.6 43.2 48.4 12.8 39.8 48.2Level of Service E C D D D D B D DApproach Delay (s) 36.3 48.7 47.1 40.2Approach LOS D D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 42.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 78: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: University Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 38

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 1838 21 20 1356 25 59 48 26 33 19 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3431 3419 1747 1606Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.84 0.78 0.89Satd. Flow (perm) 225 3431 2868 1399 1444Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 28 1998 23 22 1474 27 64 52 28 36 21 68RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 28 2020 0 0 1522 0 0 138 0 0 92 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 29 39 51Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 13 20Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 8Permitted Phases 6 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 93.5 93.5 93.5 27.5 27.5Effective Green, g (s) 93.5 93.5 93.5 27.5 27.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 162 2468 2063 296 305v/s Ratio Prot c0.59v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.53 c0.10 0.06v/c Ratio 0.17 0.82 0.74 0.47 0.30Uniform Delay, d1 5.9 12.5 10.9 44.8 43.2Progression Factor 1.79 1.75 1.13 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.8 0.2 5.2 2.5Delay (s) 11.1 22.7 12.5 50.0 45.7Level of Service B C B D DApproach Delay (s) 22.5 12.5 50.0 45.7Approach LOS C B D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 79: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Ashby Avenue & 9th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 41

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 48 866 6 34 1011 87 17 6 23 90 12 101Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.93 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3535 1770 3487 1692 1770 1545Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.87 0.77 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 406 3535 540 3487 1502 1430 1545Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 52 941 7 37 1099 95 18 7 25 98 13 110RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 22 0 0 97 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 948 0 37 1191 0 0 28 0 98 26 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 3 11Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 12.9 12.9 12.9Effective Green, g (s) 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 12.9 12.9 12.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.12 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 2831 432 2793 176 168 181v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 c0.34 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.16 0.33 0.09 0.43 0.16 0.58 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 2.5 3.0 2.3 3.3 43.7 46.0 43.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 2.16 2.53 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 5.1 0.4Delay (s) 3.6 3.3 5.1 8.4 44.1 51.1 44.0Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 3.3 8.3 44.1 47.1Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 10.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 80: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis48: University Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekend 2030 Plus Project PM

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 49

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 123 1601 142 635 1007 126 228 599 202 213 659 146Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.2Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3321 1719 3264 1719 3158 1719 3273Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3321 1719 3264 1719 3158 1719 3273Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.80 0.80 0.80Adj. Flow (vph) 145 1884 167 668 1060 133 265 697 235 266 824 182RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 26 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 145 2046 0 668 1186 0 265 906 0 266 991 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 162 191 98 66Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 3 16 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 14.5 50.0 24.0 59.5 11.0 29.0 11.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 50.0 24.0 59.5 11.0 28.8 11.0 28.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.38 0.18 0.46 0.08 0.22 0.08 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 192 1277 317 1494 145 700 145 725v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.62 c0.39 0.36 0.15 0.29 c0.15 c0.30v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.76 1.60 2.11 0.79 1.83 1.29 1.83 1.37Uniform Delay, d1 56.0 40.0 53.0 30.0 59.5 50.6 59.5 50.6Progression Factor 0.87 1.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 273.4 508.8 4.4 398.1 143.1 401.1 174.0Delay (s) 59.0 323.0 561.8 34.5 457.6 193.9 460.6 224.6Level of Service E F F C F F F FApproach Delay (s) 305.6 223.8 252.3 274.0Approach LOS F F F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 266.3 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 134.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 81: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

Movement Summary

University Ave / Frontage Road / IH 80 WB Ramp

Weekday PM Peak Hour Future 2030

Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement

Site: Weekday PMF 2030 H:\TETP\000000 - General Projects\103691 - Berkley CA\Sept 2009 Part 2 New Alignment\SIDRA\University RA with Mitigation.aap Processed Sep 29, 2009 04:38:28PM A1771, WSA, Large Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com

Roundabout

Vehicle Movements

Mov ID Turn Dem Flow (veh/h)

%HV Deg of Satn (v/c)

Aver Delay (sec)

Level of Service

95% Back of Queue

(ft)

Prop. Queued

Eff. Stop Rate

Aver Speed (mph)

Northbound Frontage Rd 3L L 36 2.8 0.300 9.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.66 24.4

8T T 212 1.9 0.300 3.5 LOS A 51 0.43 0.39 26.7

8R R 76 2.6 0.300 4.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.47 26.4 Approach 324 2.2 0.300 4.3 LOS A 51 0.43 0.44 26.4

I-80 Off Ramp

11L L 155 1.9 0.184 10.8 LOS B 28 0.55 0.75 24.2 16T T 3 25.0 0.182 4.6 LOS A 28 0.55 0.54 26.4

16R R 1 50.0 0.182 5.6 LOS A 28 0.55 0.62 26.0

Approach 161 3.1 0.184 10.6 LOS B 28 0.55 0.74 24.2

Westbound University Ave

1L L 272 1.8 0.252 10.4 LOS B 46 0.57 0.72 24.2

6T T 234 3.0 0.252 5.0 LOS A 46 0.58 0.56 26.2 6R R 11 8.3 0.250 6.0 LOS A 45 0.58 0.64 25.8

Approach 518 2.5 0.252 7.9 LOS A 46 0.57 0.64 25.0

Southbound Frontage Rd

7L L 10 9.1 0.208 10.6 LOS B 34 0.60 0.78 24.1 4T T 209 1.9 0.207 4.7 LOS A 34 0.60 0.53 26.1

4R R 20 5.0 0.057 7.1 LOS A 8 0.59 0.66 25.7

Approach 240 2.5 0.207 5.2 LOS A 34 0.60 0.55 26.0

Eastbound University Ave

5L L 72 1.4 0.171 10.9 LOS B 29 0.59 0.74 24.1

2T T 152 3.3 0.171 5.0 LOS A 30 0.58 0.56 26.2 2R R 107 1.9 0.171 5.8 LOS A 30 0.58 0.62 25.8

Approach 331 2.4 0.171 6.6 LOS A 30 0.58 0.62 25.6

All Vehicles 1574 2.5 0.300 6.7 LOS A 51 0.55 0.59 25.5

Page 1 of 1Movement Summary

9/29/2009about:blank

Page 82: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 133 1095 468 88 1360 87 260 209 67 86 227 328Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3262 1719 3438 1385 3433 1776 1770 1863 1503Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3262 1719 3438 1385 3433 1776 1770 1863 1503Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 143 1177 503 95 1462 94 274 220 71 97 255 369RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 0 18 0 10 0 0 0 140Lane Group Flow (vph) 143 1640 0 95 1462 76 274 281 0 97 255 229Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 62.0 7.0 57.0 57.0 11.0 22.8 10.2 22.0 22.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 62.0 7.0 57.0 57.0 11.0 22.8 10.2 22.0 22.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.52 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.19 0.08 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1685 100 1633 658 315 337 150 342 276v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.50 0.06 c0.43 0.08 c0.16 0.05 0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.15v/c Ratio 0.83 0.97 0.95 0.90 0.11 0.87 0.83 0.65 0.75 0.83Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 28.2 56.3 28.8 17.5 53.8 46.8 53.2 46.4 47.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.12 1.53 1.03 1.02 1.00 1.01 1.04Incremental Delay, d2 24.6 14.6 63.8 6.6 0.3 21.3 15.8 8.5 7.9 16.9Delay (s) 77.6 42.8 122.5 38.8 27.0 76.7 63.7 61.7 54.5 66.0Level of Service E D F D C E E E D EApproach Delay (s) 45.5 42.9 70.0 61.4Approach LOS D D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 83: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project AM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 744 1388 290 72 710 186 116 254 52 96 196 229Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3332 1719 3322 1770 3417 1770 1863 1573Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3332 1719 3322 1770 3417 1770 1863 1573Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 759 1416 296 78 772 202 129 282 58 109 223 260RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 0 0 23Lane Group Flow (vph) 759 1698 0 78 956 0 129 327 0 109 223 237Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 79.4 8.6 35.0 11.0 16.0 9.0 14.0 67.0Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 79.4 8.6 35.0 11.0 16.0 9.0 14.0 67.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.61 0.07 0.27 0.08 0.12 0.07 0.11 0.52Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 701 2035 114 894 150 421 123 201 859v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.51 0.05 c0.29 c0.07 0.10 0.06 c0.12 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.04v/c Ratio 1.08 0.83 0.68 1.07 0.86 0.78 0.89 1.11 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 38.5 20.1 59.4 47.5 58.7 55.3 60.0 58.0 17.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.11 0.89 0.54Incremental Delay, d2 58.6 4.2 15.0 49.7 35.7 8.7 46.4 94.7 0.2Delay (s) 97.1 24.3 72.9 95.8 94.5 64.0 113.0 146.4 9.8Level of Service F C E F F E F F AApproach Delay (s) 46.7 94.1 72.4 80.3Approach LOS D F E F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 64.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 84: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 139 1432 361 93 1212 58 514 441 114 119 241 511Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3319 1719 3438 1334 3433 1788 1770 1863 1510Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3319 1719 3438 1334 3433 1788 1770 1863 1510Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 149 1540 388 100 1303 62 541 464 120 134 271 574RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 0 12 0 7 0 0 0 138Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 1912 0 100 1303 50 541 577 0 134 271 436Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 69.0 6.0 61.0 61.0 18.0 37.0 8.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 69.0 6.0 61.0 61.0 18.0 37.0 8.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.50 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.27 0.06 0.20 0.20Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 1660 75 1520 590 448 479 103 365 295v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.58 c0.06 0.38 0.16 c0.32 0.08 0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.29v/c Ratio 0.86 1.15 1.33 0.86 0.09 1.21 1.21 1.30 0.74 1.48Uniform Delay, d1 61.0 34.5 66.0 34.6 22.3 60.0 50.5 65.0 52.2 55.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 26.8 74.4 216.5 6.5 0.3 112.8 110.8 189.4 7.9 232.0Delay (s) 87.8 108.9 282.5 41.0 22.6 172.8 161.3 254.4 60.2 287.5Level of Service F F F D C F F F E FApproach Delay (s) 107.4 56.8 166.8 220.1Approach LOS F E F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 125.6 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 138.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 85: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Dwight Way & Dwight Crescent Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 158 135 182 50 195 58 618 281 99 439 1Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1792 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1862Flt Permitted 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 1792 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 193 165 253 69 212 71 672 343 108 477 1RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 35 0 0 0 68 0 0 215 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 323 0 0 322 144 71 672 128 108 478 0Turn Type Split Split Perm Prot Perm ProtProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 8Actuated Green, G (s) 17.9 17.0 17.0 4.8 33.8 33.8 6.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.9 17.0 17.0 4.8 33.8 33.8 6.0 35.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 336 297 94 694 590 117 719v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.18 0.04 c0.36 c0.06 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.08v/c Ratio 0.94 0.96 0.48 0.76 0.97 0.22 0.92 0.66Uniform Delay, d1 35.9 36.5 32.9 42.4 27.9 19.4 42.1 23.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 32.4 37.7 1.2 28.6 27.2 0.8 59.3 2.3Delay (s) 68.2 74.2 34.2 71.0 55.2 20.3 101.4 25.3Level of Service E E C E E C F CApproach Delay (s) 68.2 58.3 45.2 39.4Approach LOS E E D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 49.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.7 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 86: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Ashby Avenue & 7th Street Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 381 687 166 119 1130 97 250 452 116 253 290 890Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3318 1719 3394 1770 3403 1770 1863 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3318 1719 3394 1770 3403 1770 1863 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 389 701 169 129 1228 105 278 502 129 288 330 1011RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 6 0 0 20 0 0 0 39Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 852 0 129 1327 0 278 611 0 288 330 972Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 3 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 19 17Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split pt+ovProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 7 5Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 19.0 45.6 13.4 40.0 20.0 20.0 14.0 14.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 45.6 13.4 40.0 20.0 20.0 14.0 14.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.41 0.12 0.36 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.30Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 297 1375 209 1234 322 619 225 237 475v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 0.26 0.08 c0.39 0.16 c0.18 0.16 0.18 c0.61v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 1.31 0.62 0.62 1.08 0.86 0.99 1.28 1.39 2.05Uniform Delay, d1 45.5 25.4 45.9 35.0 43.7 44.9 48.0 48.0 38.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.39 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 161.5 2.1 4.8 47.3 20.5 32.4 155.6 200.3 478.0Delay (s) 207.0 27.5 68.5 65.6 64.2 77.3 203.6 248.3 516.5Level of Service F C E E E E F F FApproach Delay (s) 82.9 65.8 73.3 406.8Approach LOS F E E F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 176.8 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 87: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis54: Dwight Way & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 89 479 107 133 464 188 163 1071 159 151 1489 29Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3396 3320 1719 3337 1719 3420Flt Permitted 0.61 0.57 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2073 1907 1719 3337 1719 3420Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 102 551 123 139 483 196 183 1203 179 164 1618 32RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 28 0 0 11 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 762 0 0 790 0 183 1371 0 164 1649 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 59 32 29Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 17 9 12 12Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Turn Type Perm Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 39.0 39.0 10.0 49.5 10.0 49.5Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 11.0 51.0 11.0 51.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.46 0.10 0.46Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 773 711 172 1547 172 1586v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.41 0.10 c0.48v/s Ratio Perm 0.37 c0.41v/c Ratio 0.99 1.11 1.06 0.89 0.95 1.04Uniform Delay, d1 34.2 34.5 49.5 26.9 49.2 29.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.99 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 28.5 68.7 80.9 6.8 54.7 33.6Delay (s) 62.7 103.2 120.9 33.3 103.9 63.1Level of Service E F F C F EApproach Delay (s) 62.7 103.2 43.6 66.8Approach LOS E F D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 64.8 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 114.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 88: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis57: Ashby Avenue & San Pablo Avenue Weekday 2030 Plus Project PM - Mitigated

West Berkeley SEIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 277 734 112 9 705 146 372 930 87 316 1433 169Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3348 1719 3334 1719 3388 1719 3376Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 259 3348 290 3334 1719 3388 1719 3376Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 301 798 122 10 766 159 404 1011 95 343 1558 184RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 16 0 0 6 0 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 909 0 10 909 0 404 1100 0 343 1734 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 11 5 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 2 2Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%Parking (#/hr) 0Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 19.0 41.0 21.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 36.0 25.0 25.0 20.0 43.0 22.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.39 0.20 0.41Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 1096 66 758 313 1324 344 1381v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.27 0.27 c0.24 0.32 0.20 c0.51v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.03v/c Ratio 1.58 0.83 0.15 1.20 1.29 0.83 1.00 1.26Uniform Delay, d1 33.4 34.2 34.0 42.5 45.0 30.2 44.0 32.5Progression Factor 0.93 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93Incremental Delay, d2 281.6 5.0 1.1 102.1 152.7 6.2 32.6 117.9Delay (s) 312.7 29.7 35.1 144.6 197.7 36.4 75.4 148.1Level of Service F C D F F D E FApproach Delay (s) 99.5 143.4 79.5 136.2Approach LOS F F E F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 114.7 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.7% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 89: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

Movement Summary

University Ave / Frontage Road / IH 80 WB Ramp

Weekend Midday Peak Hour Future 2030

Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement

Site: Weekend MDF 2030 H:\TETP\000000 - General Projects\103691 - Berkley CA\Sept 2009 Part 2 New Alignment\SIDRA\University RA with Mitigation.aap Processed Sep 29, 2009 04:40:34PM A1771, WSA, Large Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com

Roundabout

Vehicle Movements

Mov ID Turn Dem Flow (veh/h)

%HV Deg of Satn (v/c)

Aver Delay (sec)

Level of Service

95% Back of Queue

(ft)

Prop. Queued

Eff. Stop Rate

Aver Speed (mph)

Northbound Frontage Rd

3L L 76 2.6 0.158 9.6 LOS A 22 0.43 0.68 24.4 8T T 52 1.9 0.159 3.8 LOS A 22 0.43 0.42 26.7

8R R 31 3.2 0.158 4.5 LOS A 22 0.43 0.49 26.4

Approach 159 2.5 0.158 6.7 LOS A 22 0.43 0.56 25.5

I-80 Off Ramp

11L L 78 2.6 0.093 9.7 LOS A 13 0.49 0.70 24.5

16T T 2 33.3 0.094 4.1 LOS A 13 0.49 0.48 26.6 16R R 1 50.0 0.091 5.1 LOS A 13 0.49 0.57 26.2

Approach 83 4.8 0.093 9.4 LOS A 13 0.49 0.69 24.6

Westbound University Ave

1L L 96 2.1 0.180 9.9 LOS A 29 0.47 0.68 24.4 6T T 300 3.0 0.180 4.0 LOS A 30 0.46 0.44 26.6

6R R 11 8.3 0.179 4.9 LOS A 30 0.46 0.53 26.2

Approach 408 2.9 0.180 5.4 LOS A 30 0.46 0.50 26.0

Southbound Frontage Rd

7L L 8 11.1 0.110 10.0 LOS B 16 0.50 0.71 24.3

4T T 110 1.8 0.110 4.0 LOS A 16 0.50 0.45 26.5 4R R 102 2.9 0.109 5.4 LOS A 16 0.52 0.59 26.0

Approach 221 2.7 0.110 4.9 LOS A 16 0.51 0.52 26.2

Eastbound University Ave 5L L 147 2.0 0.198 9.2 LOS A 33 0.39 0.63 24.6

2T T 201 3.0 0.198 3.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.38 26.9

2R R 139 2.2 0.198 4.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.47 26.4 Approach 487 2.5 0.198 5.4 LOS A 33 0.38 0.48 26.0

All Vehicles 1358 2.8 0.198 5.7 LOS A 33 0.44 0.52 25.9

Page 1 of 1Movement Summary

9/29/2009about:blank

Page 90: APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS · APPENDIX A: INTERSECTION CALCULATION SHEETS ... Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: University Avenue & 6th Street Weekend 2030 Plus Project MID - Mitigated

West Berkeley Project EIR Synchro 7 - ReportWilbur Smith Associates Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 259 1678 340 98 1141 86 486 230 91 124 267 580Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3339 1719 3438 1355 3433 1761 1770 1863 1517Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 3339 1719 3438 1355 3433 1761 1038 1863 1517Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 278 1804 366 105 1227 92 512 242 96 139 300 652RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 21 0 12 0 0 0 222Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 2156 0 105 1227 71 512 326 0 139 300 430Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 4Permitted Phases 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 58.0 6.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 42.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 58.0 6.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 42.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.48 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.35 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 272 1614 86 1289 508 315 616 234 419 341v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.65 c0.06 0.36 c0.15 0.19 0.16v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.13 c0.28v/c Ratio 1.02 1.34 1.22 0.95 0.14 1.63 0.53 0.59 0.72 1.26Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 31.0 57.0 36.4 24.7 54.5 31.1 41.6 43.0 46.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.22 0.71 0.78 1.00 1.04 1.01 1.02 1.04Incremental Delay, d2 51.7 154.2 143.7 10.3 0.3 294.9 0.8 3.4 5.0 136.7Delay (s) 102.2 185.2 213.1 36.3 19.6 349.3 33.1 45.5 48.6 185.2Level of Service F F F D B F C D D FApproach Delay (s) 175.8 48.2 223.6 129.9Approach LOS F D F F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 142.9 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group