APPENDIX 2: VOLUME 1 APPENDICES - psdf.eccogta.gov.za

APPENDICES AND TOOLKITS: VOLUME 1 APPENDICES

EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: DRAFT

APPENDIX 2: VOLUME 1 APPENDICES



REFERENCES Agricultural & Rural Development Research Institute, University of Fort Hare, undated (1990?) An Agricultural Guide Book for Ciskei. Alice. Alfred Nzo District Municipality, 2009. Area Based Plan Draft. East London

Alfred Nzo Spatial Development Framework (2007)

Amathole District Municipality, 2009. Area Based Plan Draft. East London Amathole District Municipality, 2005. Development and Implementation of an Integrated Coastal Management Programme Bekker, S.B, 2002. Migration Study in the Western Cape 2001. Provincial Government of the Western Cape, June 2002. Biotechnology& Environmental Specialist Consultancy, 2009, Legislation List, Boshoff A & Wilson S 2005 Terrestrial Ecology Component For The Wild Coast Strategic Environmental Assessment. Terrestrial Ecology Research Unit, NMMU, Pt Elizabeth. Cacadu District Municipality, 2008. Area Based Plan and Land Availability Audit. Port Elizabeth Cross, C., 2000. Spatial implications of population migration for South Africa’s development and infrastructure programmes. University of Kwazulu-Natal, January 2000. Coleman M., 2007. Nqabara Land Tenure Report, East London. Crush, J., 2008. South Africa. Policy in the Face of Xenophobia. Migration Policy Institute (MPI) Newsletter, July 2008.

C.S.I.R. 2004, Eastern Cape State of the Environment Report, Bhisho Department of Agriculture, 2009. Abstract of 2009 Statistics. Government Printer, Pretoria. Department of Agriculture, Administration Manual for State Agricultural Land. Department of Agriculture, AGIS website. Department of Agriculture, Eastern Cape, Strategic Plan 2006-2009, Bhisho. Department of Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism. 2003. Review of the Socio-economic Base. Bhisho. Department of Economic Development and Environment Affairs. 2005. Eastern Cape Tourism Master Plan. Bhisho. Department of Land Affairs. 2006. Implementation Plan for the Pro-active Land Acquisition Strategy.Pretoria. Department of Roads and Transport, Eastern Cape Province. 2007. Provincial Land Transport Framework. Bhisho. Department of Roads and Transport, Eastern Cape Province. 2004. Rural Transport Plan. Bhisho. Development Bank of Southern Africa.1996. Eastern Cape: South Africa’s Nine provinces: A Human Development profile.Pretoria: DBSA. DME, 2008. Statistical Yearbook 2008. Department of Minerals and Energy, May 2008. du Toit, A. and Ally, F, 2003. The externalization and casualisation of farm labour in Western Cape horticulture. Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), Research report no. 16, December 2003



Eastern Cape Aids Council, 2007. Draft Multi-Sectoral HIV and AIDS Strategic Framework 2007-2014. Eastern Cape Aids Council, January 2007 Eastern Cape Provincial Government, 2003. Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP): Strategy Framework for Growth and Development. June 2003. ECSECC, 2009. Statistical database: Census 1996 and 2001 and Community Survey 2007. Used by kind permission of ECSECC. ECSECC, 2007. Quantec regional data 2007. Used by kind permission of ECSECC. ECSECC, 2009. Statistical database: Census 1996 and 2001 and Community Survey 2007. Used by kind permission of ECSECC. Edwards, C., 2003. PGDP baseline and constraints paper. January 2003. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, 1978. Agricultural Potential of the Ciskei. Alice. Farmers Weekly, 9

th October 2009. Land Claims Withdrawn.

FHISER, et. al., 2006. Rapid assessment of service delivery and socio-economic survey in the Eastern Cape. Fort Hare Institute of Social and Economic Research (FHISER), June 2006. Fine, B. and Rustomjee, Z., 1996. The Political Economy of South Africa. C. Hurst and Co., 1996. Grulke, Wolfgang and Gus Silber, 2001: Lessons in radical innovation: South Africans leading the World. @One Communications. See Omae, Kenichi, 2005: The next global stage: Challenges and opportunities in our borderless world. Wharton School Publishing.

Hall, Peter, 1998: Cities in Civilization. Weidefeld & Nicolson. Harington, J.S. et. al., 2004. A century of migrant labour in the gold mines of South Africa. Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, March 2004. Hawkins & Associates, 1980. The Physical and Spatial Basis for Transkei’s First Five Year Development Plan. Salisbury. Herrington, M., et.al., 2008. South Africa Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring (GEM) report 2008. University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business, Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, May 2009. Hill Kaplan Scott, Undated. (1976) Keiskamma River Basin Study, East London. Kok, P. et. al., 2003. Post-apartheid patterns of internal migration in South Africa. HSRC, 2003. Land and Agricultural Policy Centre, 1995. Overview of the Transkei Region of the Eastern Cape Province Marais, L. et. al., 2003. Mineworker housing needs in post-apartheid South Africa: Some policy implications. Centre for Development Support, University of the Free State, 2003. McCarthy T. & Rubidge B., 2005, The Story of Earth and Life: A Southern African perspective on a 4.6-billion-year journey, Struik, Cape Town. Mike Davies, 2004: Planet of Slums: Urban involution and the informal proletariat. New Left Review, March/April 2004. Ministry of Rural Development and Land Reform. 2009. The Comprehensive Rural Development Programme framework. Pretoria OTP/ECSECC, 2009. District service delivery overviews. March 2009. Policy Co-ordination & Advisory Services, The Presidency. 2004. Harmonising and Aligning: The National Spatial Development Perspective, Provincial



Growth and Development Strategies and Municipal Integrated Development Plans. Accessed on Internet: www.thepresidency.gov.za Press Release: T.Mntengwana. 31 October 2008. Metrorail adds more trains. Press release: 22 September 2009. Transnet’s Ngqura Rail Operations ready for launch. Public Service Commission, 2003. Report on the Evaluation of Land Administration in the Eastern Cape. Simelane, S. et. al, 2009. Inter-provincial migration in South Africa: A closer look at the characteristics of migrants and the levels and trend of migrant streams. Statistics South Africa, 57

th session of the International Statistical

Institute (ISI), August 2009. Smith B., 2006. The Farming Handbook, University of KwaZulu Natal Press, Scottsville. Smith, N. & Wilson, S.L. 2002. Changing Land Use Trends In The Thicket Biome: Pastoralism To Game Farming, Report 38, Terrestrial Ecology Research Unit, University of Port Elizabeth Southall, R., 1982. Transkei: The political economy of an ‘independent’ Bantustan. Heinemann, 1982. State of Play Report for the East Cape Coastal Management Plan. Statistics South Africa, 2009a. Mid-year population estimates 2009. Statistical release P0302, July 2009. Statistics South Africa, 2009b. Quarterly labour force survey: Q2 2009. Statistical release P0211, July 2009. Statistics South Africa, 2009c. Gross Domestic Product: Regional Estimates 2000-2008. Statistical release P0441, November 2009.

Statistics South Africa, 2008 and 2009. Quarterly labour force survey. Statistical releases P0210 and P0211, August 2008 and July 2009. Statistics South Africa, 2007. A national poverty line for South Africa. Discussion paper with National Treasury, February 2007. Statistics South Africa, 2006a. Migration and urbanisation in South Africa. Report no. 03-04-02, 2006. Statistics South Africa, 2006b. Migration and changing settlement patterns. Statistical report 03-04-01, 2006. The Presidency. Minister in the Presidency: National Planning. 2009. Green Paper: National Strategic Planning. South Africa. Accessed on Internet: www.thepresidency.gov.za The Presidency. Policy Co-ordination and Advisory Services. 2006. National Spatial Development perspective. Accessed on Internet: www.thepresidency.gov.za Tshani Consulting.C.C. 2008. Specialist Study on the Proposed N2 Wild Coast Toll Highway: Planning and Development Study. Townsend, F. 2001. Focus on East London and Surrounds: Review of economic sectors in the new Buffalo City, Musgrave: Norma Beyl & Associates. Umhlaba, 2007. Establishment of a National Park on the South African Wild Coast: Final Situational Analysis, DEAT, Cape Town. UN-Habitat, 2008. State of the World’s Cities 2008/09 – Harmonious Cities. UN-Habitat, 2008. WILD COAST PROJECT, 2005. Spatial Development Framework for The Wild Coast. Wilson, F. and Ramphele, M., 1989. Uprooting Poverty: The South African challenge. David Phillip, 1989.



Women on Farms Project, 2006. Rotten Fruits 2: South African Farm Workers Pay a High Price for Profits. Women on Farms Project, January 2006. http://www.malotiroute.co.za/Lesotho/Start.asp, accessed 22/9/2009 http://maloti.opencms.co.za/site/news/, accessed 22/9/2009/

http://www.peaceparks.org/Parks_1022100000_0_0_0_0_4_Maloti-

Drakensberg+TFCA+Maloti-Drakensberg.htm, accessed 22/9/2009



SETTLEMENT CATEGORIES



POSSIBLE CATEGORIES OF SETTLEMENTS (Draft Version 3 21-10-09)

DISTRICT PROVINCIAL CENTRE

DISTRICT CENTRE

SUB DISTRICT

LOCAL CENTRE

SUB-LOCAL CENTRE

Cacadu Port Elizabeth Grahamstown Kenton on Sea Cookhouse Alicedale

Uitenhage/Despatch Graaf Reinet Alexandria Bathurst Addo

Jeffreys Bay Despatch Paterson Colechester

Port Alfred Joubertina Oyster Bay Cape St. Francis

Humansdorp Kirkwood St. Francis Bay Rietbron

Somerset East Riebeeck East Louterwater

Hankey Boknesstrand Cannon Rocks Kruisfontein

Kareedouw Steytlerville Bethelsdorp

Aberdeen Pearston Jansenville

Nieu Bethesda Stormsriver

Klipplaat Misgund

Patensie Willowmore

Adendorp

Amathole East London Bhisho Fort Beaufort Alice Kei Road

King Williams Town Butterworth Adelaide Middledrift

Stutterheim Bedford Balfour

Willowvale Keiskammahoek

Centane Seymour

Cathcart Hogsback

Elliotdale Komgha

Ngqamakhwe Kei Mouth

Dutywa Kidds Beach

Peddie Hamburg

Amabele



DISTRICT

PROVINCIAL CENTRE

DISTRICT CENTRE

SUB DISTRICT

LOCAL CENTRE

SUB-LOCAL CENTRE

Ndabakazi

Nqabara

O.R.Tambo Mthatha Port St Johns Tabankulu Coffee Bay

Lusikisiki Qumbu Mazeppa Bay

Bizana Tsolo Mzamba

Libode Coghlan

Ngqeleni Langeni Forest

Mqanduli Mvezo

Flagstaff Viedgesville

Qunu

Gogozayo

All Saints

Mfundisweni

Magusheni

Tombo

Holy Cross

Fort Malan

Macibini

Tabase

Majola

Zincuka

Gwadana

Bolotwa

Nqadu

Baziya

Kwaaiman

Qokolweni

Baziya



O.R.Tambo Nkozo

(continued) Mthontsasa

DISTRICT

PROVINCIAL CENTRE

DISTRICT CENTRE

SUB DISTRICT

LOCAL CENTRE

SUB-LOCAL CENTRE

Mpheko

Mqhekezweni

Coffee Bay

Hole in the Walll

Mbotyi

Msikaba

Alfred Nzo Mt Ayliff Mount Frere Matatiele Cedarville

Maluti

Rietvlei

Chris Hani Queenstown Middleburg Cofimvaba Indwe

Ngcobo Elliot Dordrecht

Cradock Tsomo Sterkstroom

Cala Tarkastad

Lady Frere Qamata

Clarkebury

Ilinge

Ncora

Molteno

Sada/Whittlesea

Hofmeyer

St Marks

Ukhahlamba Aliwal North Maclear Burgersdorp Steynsburg

Sterkspruit Ugie Oviston

Mount Fletcher Lady Grey Venterstad

Barkly East Rhodes

Jamestown

Rossouw



QUESTIONAIRE



Focus Group Icebreakers The purpose of these icebreakers is to facilitate engagement of stakeholders at District Focus Group Sessions and one on one, meetings. 1. What do you understand by Rural Development and where should Rural Development be focussed? 2. Where in your opinion are the rapid economic growth points of the Eastern Cape situated? 3. Where should the main Provincial transport routes/activity corridors be located? 4. Which areas or towns or settlements do you feel should be the main development centres (nodes) of our Province? 5. The study of the Province concludes the growth of settlements is consolidating in city regions, alongside the main transport routes and within easy commuter distance from the main centres. Do you agree with this? 6. If you agree, where in your view, are these city regions and these growing settlements?

7. What areas in our Province do you value as special places which should be protected or conserved? 8. Where should development be encouraged and where should it not go?

9. What would be the best way to engage with stakeholders to obtain their buy in and support for the Provincial Spatial Development Plan and its proposals?

10. Do you feel Transportation system could help develop our rural areas? If so, where we should upgrade transport systems and how? 11. How vital do you feel that there should be a limit to the spread of urban settlements, villages, towns and cities?

12. How do you wish to remain informed and participate in the future planning of the Province?



Technical Engagement The purpose of this questionnaire is to ascertain Spatial Planning capacity and system existing in the Municipalities.

1. Which of the following challenges affect your area?

2. Do you keep records of Development applications? Yes…..No….. 3. Do you assess all development and land use change applications

according to evaluation criteria? Yes…..No….. If no do you see a need for such criteria? Yes…..No….. 4. Which of these organisations do you have regular planning meetings to

align programmes and co-ordinate spatial planning?

5. What role should Provincial Town Planning play in Spatial Development

Planning and Land Use Management? ........................................................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6. Are there opportunities to improve linkages and a Spatial Planning

partnership with Province? Yes…..No….

If yes explain what your expectations would be:- ……………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

7. Do you have staff responsible for Spatial Planning in your organisation? Yes……No….

If yes, how many……………………………………………………………… (*Please indicate the degree of importance from 1= least important to 5= most important)

8. If no, are there any plans to employ town planning staff? Yes……No…. 9. Do you have Land Use Management Guidelines? Yes…..No….

Y N 1-5 *

Uncontrolled settlement sprawl

Invasion of land

Illegal change of land use

Building without approval

Pressure for development outside serviced areas

Land claims delaying development

Land use management guidelines ignored by decision makers

Outdated Town Planning Scheme

Outdated Legislation

Complex approval process

Other

ECDC Safety and Security

Eskom Rural Development and Land Reform

Development Agencies Agriculture and Rural Development

SANRAL Water and Forestry

Transnet Environment

Education Tourism

Social development Public Works

Other



If no, would you need Land Use Managements Guidelines? Yes…. No.… 10. Do you have a Local Spatial Development Framework? Yes…..No…..

11.1 If no, why

not?..........................................................................................................................................................

……………………………………………………...……….………………………………………………………………….

11. How often is your Spatial Development Framework being reviewed?

Every year

1-2 years

3-4 years

5 years

12. Is your SDF inline with your IDP? Yes…..No…. 13. Does it reflect all projects spatially? Yes…..No….

13. Do you have principles from the NSDP or ECPSDP to align with your SDF? Yes…No… 14. Which of these principles do you use to align your SDF?

Principle 1: Rapid economic growth is a prerequisite for achievement of other policy objectives.

Principle 2: Government has a constitutional obligation to provide basic services to all where-ever they reside.

Principle 3: Fixed investment should be focussed on localities of economic growth and/or potential.

Principle 4: Efforts to redress past inequalities should focus on

people and not places. Principle 5: Future settlement and economic development opportunities should be channelled into activity corridors and nodes that are adjacent to or link the main growth centres.

15. Do you have a GIS database system? Yes……No…… 16. Please indicate the type of programme you are using

Arc View

Auto Cad

Model Maker

Alicad

Other

17. Do you have a spatial GIS system running where land use changes are recorded on a regularly basis? Yes…..No….. 18. Do you have any challenges faced by development and land use changes

in the municipality? Yes….No…. If yes please list these challenges…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. THANK YOU PROJECT LEADER: Tshani Consulting CC; TEL: 043-7221198; FAX: 043-7438485; EMAIL: [email protected]



RESULTS OF SURVEY OF SPATIAL PLANNING


EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: DRAFT PROPOSALS 51

EC PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Survey of Spatial Planning and Technical Capability: March 2010

Question Responses

Nqushwa

Emalahleni

InxubaYethemba

Sakhisizwe

Engcobo

Lukhanji

Port St Johns

O.R.Tambo DM

Nyandeni

Mhlontlo

Alfred Nzo DM

Umzimvubu

Matatiele

Baviaans

Ndlambe

Senqu

Elundini

Total %age

1.Which of the following challenges affect your area?

Uncontrolled settlement sprawl Yes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 12 70.59

Uncontrolled settlement sprawl No 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 17.65

Sprawl Degree of challenge 1 to 5 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 5 0 3 4 0 4 1 2 5 3 38 44.71

Invasion of land Yes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 13 76.47

Invasion of land No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5.88

Invasion Degree of challenge 1 to 5 1 0 3 0 5 0 4 4 0 3 3 0 4 1 3 3 4 38 44.71

Illegal change of land use yes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 14 82.35

Illegal change of land use No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Land Use Degree of challenge 1 to 5 3 0 2 0 3 1 3 4 0 4 3 0 4 3 3 4 3 40 47.06

Building without approval Yes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 94.12

Building without approval No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Degree of challenge 1 to 5 5 0 3 0 5 2 4 4 5 4 2 0 4 4 4 4 3 53 62.35

Pressure for Development o/side Yes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 11 64.71

Pressure for Development

o/side No 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 11.76




Land Claim delays Yes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 13 76.47

Land Claim delays No 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 23.53


LUMS Guidelines being ignored Yes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 12 70.59

LUMS Guidelines being ignored No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 17.65

LUMS Degree of challenge 1 to 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 4 5 3 2 0 0 1 3 1 0 39 45.88

Outdated Town Planning Scheme Yes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 94.12

Outdated Town Planning Scheme No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00


Outdated legislation Yes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 14 82.35

Outdated legislation No 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 11.76


Complex Approval Process Yes 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 10 58.82

Complex Approval Process No 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 29.41


2. Records of Development Applications

Yes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 88.24

No 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11.76

3. Assessment of applications with evaluation criteria?

Yes 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 76.47

No 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23.53

If No are such Criteria needed Yes 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23.53

4. Organisations Consulted Regularly?

ECDC 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 23.53



Eskom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 35.29

Development Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 17.65

SANRAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17.65

Transnet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Education 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 35.29

Social Development 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 29.41

Safety and Security 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 23.53

Rural Dev and Land Reform 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 52.94

Agric and Rural Development 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 12 70.59

Water and Forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 29.41

Environment 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 52.94

Tourism 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 47.06

Public Works 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 29.41

Other LG&TA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 17.65

5. What role should Provincial Planning Play?

Improved Intergovernmental Relations 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 23.53

Regulate LUMS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11.76

Unified legislation 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29.41

Provide guidelines,support and monitor use 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 70.59

Improved communication 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 17.65

Align the PSDP from the LM

SDF 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 11.76

Provide capacity building 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 23.53

Estalish multisector forum to coordinte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5.88

6. Opportunities for a spatial planning partnership?

Yes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 14 82.35

No 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 11.76

7.How many staff responsible for Spatial Planning?

One 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 17.65



Two 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 5 29.41

Three 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Four 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11.76

Five 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

More than Five 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

No dedicated staff 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 7 41.18

8. If no staff Are there plans to employ staff?

Yes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 35.29

No 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 11 64.71

9. Do you have LUMS?

Yes 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 70.59

No 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29.41

If No - do you need LUMS?

Yes 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23.53

10. Do You have a local SDF?

Yes 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 12 70.59

No 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 29.41

11. How often is the SDF being reviewed?

Every year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

1 to 2 years 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 41.18

3 to 4 years 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 11.76

5 years 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 29.41

12. Is your SDF in line with your IDP?

Yes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 12 70.59

No 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17.65

13. Does the SDF reflect all projects spatially?

Yes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 7 41.18

No 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 47.06



14. Have NSDP or

ECPSDP principles to align SDF?

Yes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 8 47.06

No 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 41.18

15. Which principle do you use to align your SDF?

1. Rapid growth is a prerequisite 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 29.41

2. Basic services to all where they reside 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 8 47.06

3. Investment in areas of potential 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 7 41.18

4. Redress to focus on people not places 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 52.94

5. Future settlement into corridors & nodes 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 11 64.71

16. Do you have a GIS system?

Yes 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 8 47.06

No 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 52.94

17. Indicate which system you use

Arc View 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 6 35.29

Auto Cad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Model Maker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Alicad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5.88

Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

ARC GIS/Mapmagic 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

18. Are land use changes recorded on GIS?

Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 11.76

No 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 15 88.24

19. Challenges faced by development/land use change?



Yes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 15 88.24

No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5.88

List of challenges

State owned land and properties 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

No laws/enforcement to control illegal uses 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 17.65

Informal development with no survey record 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 17.65

Need GIS information 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 11.76

Rezoning of CBD properties to business 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Former R293 Tships transfer of land 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Understanding/implementation of LUMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Complex legislation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11.76

Lack of capacity and funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 23.53

Non compliance with town planning schemes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 23.53

Lack of awareness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.88

Inadequate bulk infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 23.53

Availability of serviced land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 17.65

Land Claims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 11.76

Need for more commonage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5.88

Tribal Authorities doing as they please 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5.88

APPENDIX 2: VOLUME 1 APPENDICES - psdf.eccogta.gov.za

Documents

Transcript of APPENDIX 2: VOLUME 1 APPENDICES - psdf.eccogta.gov.za