APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the...

242
APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, Volume I

Transcript of APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the...

Page 1: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, Volume I

Page 2: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(FERC)

Page 3: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
snr7593
Typewritten Text
3
Page 4: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 5: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 6: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 7: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 8: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 9: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 10: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 11: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 12: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 13: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 14: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 15: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 16: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 17: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 18: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 19: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 20: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 21: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 22: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 23: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 24: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 25: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 26: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 27: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 28: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 29: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 30: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 31: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Glenn A. Sheffield Director - Rates & Regulatory

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Room lA Washington, DC 20426

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. a Kinde Morgan company

February 25,2013

Re: Supplemental Information to Request to Initiate Commission NEPA Pre-Filing Process filed on December 5, 2012 Docket No. PF13-3-000

Dear Ms. Bose:

On December 5, 2012, Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. ("SLNG") and Elba Express Company, L.L.C. ("EEC") requested that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("Commission") initiate a National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") pre-filing review ("December 5 Request") of (1) a proposed two-phased liquefaction and export project ("Elba Liquefaction Project") that will be integrated with SLNG's existing liquefied natural gas ("LNG") terminal located at Elba Island, Chatham County, Georgia ("Terminal"), and (2) a proposed two-phased project to add compression ("EEC Expansion Project") along EEC's Elba Express Pipeline to provide natural gas to the Terminal (together the "Project"). On December 14, 2012, the Commission issued a letter stating that it will consider the December 5 Request upon full compliance with the procedures outlined in the Commission's regulations at 18 CFR 157.2l. SLNG and EEC hereby files supplemental information relating to the December 5 Request for review and written approval from the Director of the Office of Energy Projects.

Addition of Elba Liquefaction Company

On January 30, 2013, Shell US Gas & Power LLC, a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell pIc, and Southern Liquefaction Company, LLC, a Kinder Morgan company and unit of EI Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. formed the Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C. ("ELC") to develop natural gas liquefaction facilities associated with the proposed Elba Liquefaction Project. Therefore, by this Supplement, ELC joins SLNG and EEC (together "Companies") in requesting that the Commission initiate a NEPA pre-filing review of the proposed Project.

Page 32: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Page 2 February 25, 2013

Completion of Commission's Regulations

In compliance with Section 157.21 of the Commission's regulations, 1 Companies provide the following supplemental information to the December 5 Request:

1. Companies met with the Office of Energy Projects Staff ("Staff') on February 12, 2013, for an initial consultation meeting.

2. Companies provided Staff with proposals from three prospective third-party contractors on February 12,2013.

Updates to the Proj ect

Companies provide the following updates to the Project:

1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the Project have been updated as follows:

Filed Request for Authorization to Initiate NEPA Pre-filing 12/05/12

Initial Consultation Meeting with Staff 02112113 Submittal of three prospective third-party contractors 02112113 ("3PC") to Staff Approval of Pre-Filing Request 02/28113

1) Conclude 3PC contract 03112/13 2) Conduct Open Houses in Chatham, Hart, and

Jefferson County 1) Submit a stakeholder mailing list to the Commission 03/28113

Staff 2) Submit Draft RRs 1 (General) and 10 (Alternatives)

File Application December 2013 Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Statement June 2014 Commission Orders Issued September 2014 File Initial Implementation Plans September 2014 Initiate Construction November 2014 Phase 1 - In Service for Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC 2016 Expansion Project Phase 2 - In Service for Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC 2016 Expansion Project

2. An updated overview map of the EEC Expansion Project, narrowing the location of the new compressor station to Jefferson County, is attached as Appendix A.

3. An updated list of federal and state permitting agencies and the status of Companies' contact with these agencies is attached as Appendix B. Moreover, Bart Gobeil, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal's Chief Operating Officer, is the contact for the State of Georgia to consult with the Commission regarding LNG projects to be developed in Georgia.

4. A Public Affairs Overview for the Project is attached as Appendix C.

18 C.F.R. § 157.21 (2012).

Page 33: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Page 3 February 25, 2013

5. SLNG and ELC have conducted outreach via telephone and/or e-mail as shown in the attached Appendix D. In addition, SLNG and ELC have conducted outreach meetings as shown in the attached Appendix E.

6. Companies are in the process of developing a website and intend to make it publicly available by March 1, 2013. Companies will submit a supplemental filing to provide the web address.

Companies look forward to working with the Commission's Staff as well as the various federal, state, and local agencies to ensure a thorough and timely environmental review of the proposed Project. Based on the foregoing information, Companies respectfully request that the Commission approve the use of its pre-filing process for the Project by February 28,2013. Should you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (205) 325-3813.

Enclosures

cc: Lauren O'Donnell Michael McGehee Terry Turpin Rich McGuire Pamela Romano Rich Foley Larry Sauter Christine Allen

Very truly yours,

ELBA LIQUEFACTION COMPANY, L.L.C. SOUTHERN LNG COMPANY, L.L.C. ELBA EXPRESS COMPANY, L.L.C.

Director, Regulatory

Page 34: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix A EEC Expansion Project Updated Overview Map

Page 35: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIX A

-

-.....

Elba Express Company, L.L.C. a Khder Morgart oomp8fl'f

o q

EEC Expanolon ProjKt

HubnDCoaq

Page 36: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix B - Supplement Updated Federal and State Agencies for

Elba Liquefaction Project And

EEC Expansion Project

Page 37: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIXB

UPDATED LIST FOR ELBA LIQUEFACTION PROJECT

Page 38: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIXB PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

ELBA LIQUEFACTION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency I Contact I I nitiated Process Status

Federal

Section 3 and Section 7 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Filed Request to Initial Consultation Natural Gas Act Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Initiate NEPA Pre- Meeting held on

Commission Filing Process on 02/12/2013

888 First Street, N.E. 12/05/2012, in

Room 1A Docket No. PF13-3-000.

Washington , D.C. 20426 Application to be filed concurrently with Elba Liquefaction Project.

Authorization to Import and Export U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy FTA - SLNG has FTA - FE Docket Natural Gas, including LNG (DOE) 1000 Independence Ave., SW received No. 12-54-LNG -

Washington, DC 20585 authorization to SLNG has received 202-586-5000 export LNG to FTA authorization to

countries. export LNG to FTA countries.

NON-FTA - SLNG applied for NON-FTA- FE authorization to Docket No. 12-100-export LNG to non- LNG - Notice was FTA countries on published in the 08/31/12. Federal Register

on 10/17/12. The American Public Gas Association and Sierra Club filed motions to intervene and protest on 12/17/12. SLNG filed an Answer to Motions to Intervene, Protests, and Comments on 01/02/13. Sierra Club filed a Renewed Motion to Reply and Reply Comments on 01/17/13.

Waterway Suitability Assessment U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) LCDR Mark Sawyer Letter dated USCG replied by (WSA) MSU Savannah 8/29/12 sent to letter dated

100 W . Oglethorpe Ave. Ste. 1017 USCG requesting 09/11/12

Savannah, GA 31401 confirmation that a confirming that a

912-652-4353, ext. 205 new WSA is not new WSA is not necessary. necessary. Received USCG letter dated 09/11/12 that a new WSA is not necessary.

Safety and Security Review U.S. Department of Ms. Melanie Barber Correspondence 02/22/2013 -In a Transportation (DOT), Emergency Support and sent on 12/12/12 to telephone Pipeline and Hazardous Response Officer, introduce the Elba conversation DOT Materials Safety Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA Liquefaction stated that a Administration (PHMSA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Project and to project number and

Washington , DC 20590 determine the project manager agency's have not yet been willingness to assigned . participate in the NEPA pre-filing review process.

Page 39: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

ELBA LIQUEFACTION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Endangered Species Act (ESA) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Strant Colwell , Supervisory Correspondence 2/22/2013 - In a Section 7 Consultation (USFWS) Biologist sent on 12/07/12 to telephone

4890 Wildlife Drive, NE introduce the Elba conversation Townshend , GA 31331 Liquefaction USFWS stated that 912-832-8739 Project and to they will participate

determine the in the project. agency's willingness to participate in the NEPA pre-filing review process.

Section 7 Consultation (ESA), National Oceanic and Jaclyn Daly Correspondence NOAA will Marine Mammal Protection Act, Atmospheric Administration Charleston Branch Office sent on 12/07/12 to participate in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery (NOAA) Fisheries P.O. Box 12559 introduce the Elba Pre-Filing process Conservation and Management National Marine Fisheries Charleston, SC 29422-2559 Liquefaction Act (MSFCMA) Service (NMFS) 217 Fort Johnson Road Project and to

Charleston, SC 29412 determine the 843-762-8610 agency's

willingness to participate in the NEPA pre-filing review process.

Clean Water Act, Section 404; U.S. Army Corps of Lisa Lovvorn Correspondence Lisa Lovvorn made Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 Engineers (USACE), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sent on 12/07/12 to contact and stated

Savannah District Savannah District introduce the Elba that Project 100 W. Oglethorpe Ave. Liquefaction Number SAS-2012-Savannah, GA 31402 Project and to 01038 is now 912-652-5558 determine the assigned to the

agency's project. willingness to participate in the NEPA pre-filing review process.

Construction Within a Floodplain Federal Emergency 3003 Chamblee Tucker Road Correspondence Management Agency Atlanta, GA 30341 sent on 12/12/12 to (FEMA), Region IV 770-220-5200 introduce the Elba

Liquefaction Project and to determine the agency's willingness to participate in the FERC pre-filing process.

State

Georgia

Listed Species Consultation Georgia Department of Katrina Morris, Environmental Agency will be Natural Resources, Wildlife Review Coordinator contacted for Resources Division (GDNR, Georgia Department of Natural information prior to WRD) Resources initiation of field

Wildlife Resources Division surveys . 2065 Highway 78 SE Social Circle, GA 30025 770-918-6411

Section 401 Water Quality GDNR, Environmental Dale Caldwell Georgia has a joint Certification Protection Division (GEPD) Coastal District, Brunswick Office Section 404/401

Georgia EPD application 400 Commerce Center Drive process. Brunswick, GA 31523 912-506-9374

Page 40: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

ELBA LIQUEFACTION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Clean Air Act, Prevention of Georgia EPD Mr. Jac Capp Correspondence Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program Manager sent on 12/12/12 to Review Stationary Source Permitting introduce the Elba

Program Liquefaction Air Protection Branch Project. Environmental Protection Division 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354-3906 404-363-7000

Coastal Zone Management Act GDNR, Coastal Resources Kelie Moore Correspondence Coastal Zone Consistency Division Georgia Department of Natural sent on 12/12/12 to

Resources introduce the Elba Coastal Resources Division Liquefaction One Conservation Way Project. Coastal Brunswick, GA 31520 Zone Consistency 912-264-7218 will be determined

in connection with permits issued for the Elba Liquefaction Project.

National Pollutant Discharge GDNR Coastal District, Brunswick Office To be submitted Elimination System (NPDES) Georgia EPD prior to Permit for Stormwater Discharges One Conservation Way construction. from Construction Activities Brunswick, GA 31520-8687 (General Permit No. GAR 100002) 912-264-7284

National Historic Preservation Act GDNR, Historic Preservation Dr. David Crass Correspondence (NHPA), Section 106 Consultation Division Historic Preservation Division sent on 12/07/12 to

Georgia Department of Natural introduce the Elba Resources Liquefaction 34 Peachtree St. NW Project and to Atlanta, GA 30303 request review of 404-656-2840 survey

methodologies.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Catawba Indian Nation Chief Gilbert Blue Consultation to be 996 Avenue of the Nations conducted in Rock Hill , SC 29730 coordination with 803-366-4792 Georgia SHPO.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Cherokee of Georgia Tribal Chief Tall Oak Martin Consultation to be

Council Cherokee of Georgia Tribal conducted in Council coordination with PO Box 1019 Georgia SHPO. Saint George, GA 31562

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Creek Nation of Oklahoma Bill S. Fife, Principal Chief Consultation to be P.O. Box 580 conducted in Okmulgee, Oklahoma 74447 coord ination with

Georgia SHPO.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Eastern Band of Cherokee Principal Chief Michell Hicks Consultation to be

Indians P.O. Box 455 conducted in Cherokee, North Carolina 28719 coordination with 828-497 -7000 Georgia SHPO.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Georgia Tribe of Eastern Dr. Lucian Lamar Sneed Consultation to be

Cherokee Historian and Administrative conducted in Director coordination with Georgia Tribe of Eastern Georgia SHPO. Cherokee P.O. Box1915 Cumming, GA 30028 770-888-9856

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Lower Muscogee Creek Tribe Chief Vonnie McCormick Consultation to be Lower Muscogee Creek Tribe conducted in Route 2, Box 360 Whigham, coordination with GA 39897 Georgia SHPO.

Page 41: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

ELBA LIQUEFACTION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Tim Thompson , Cultural Advisor Consultation to be

Oklahoma P.O. Box 580 conducted in Okmulgee, OK 74447 coordination with 918-756-8700 Georgia SHPO.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Poarch Creek Indians Chairman Buford Rolin Consultation to be 5811 Jack Springs Road conducted in Atmore, AL 36502 coordination with 334-368-9136 Georgia SHPO.

South Carolina

South Carolina Coastal Zone South Carolina Department of John Cox Correspondence SCDHEC Management Program Health and Environmental Coastal Zone Consistency sent on 12/07/12 to responded that

Conservation (SDHEC) , Coordinator introduce the Elba they would not Ocean and Coastal Resource 1362 McMillan Ave. Liquefaction comment unless Management Suite 400 Project. dredge materials

Charleston , SC 29405 were placed in SC. 843-953-0860 [email protected]

Page 42: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIXB

UPDATED LIST FOR EEC EXPANSION PROJECT

Page 43: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

APPENDIXB PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

EEC EXPANSION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Federal

Certificate of Public Convenience Federal Energy Regulatory 888 First Street, NE Filed Request to Initial Consultation and Necessity Commission (FERC) Washington, DC 20246 Initiate NEPA Pre- Meeting held on

Filing Process on 02/12/2013 12/05/2012 Application to be filed concurrently with EEC Expansion Project

Endangered Species Act (ESA) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ms. Sandy Tucker, Field Correspondence Section 7 Consultation (USFWS) Supervisor sent on 12/7/12 to

105 Westpark Drive, Suite D introduce the EEC Athens, GA 30606 Expansion Project 706. 613.9493 and to determine

the agency's willingness to participate in the NEPA pre-filing review process.

Clean Water Act, Section 404; U.S. Army Corps of Edward Johnson, Chief Correspondence Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 Engineers (USACE), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sent on 12/7/12 to

Savannah District Savannah District, Piedmont introduce the EEC Branch Expansion Project 1590 Adamson Parkway, Suite and to determine 200 the agency's Morrow, GA 30260-1777 willingness to 678.422.2721 participate in the

NEPA pre-filing review process.

State

Georgia

Listed Species Consultation Georgia Department of Katrina Morris, Environmental Agency will be Natural Resources, Wildlife Review Coordinator contacted for Resources Division (GDNR, Georgia Department of Natural information prior to WRD) Resources initiation of field

Wildlife Resources Division surveys. 2065 Highway 78 SE Social Circle, GA 30025 770-918-6411

Section 401 Water Quality GDNR, Environmental Dale Caldwell Georgia has a joint Certification Protection Division (GEPD) Coastal District, Brunswick Office Section 404/401

Georgia EPD application 400 Commerce Center Drive process. Brunswick, GA 31523 912-506-9374

Clean Air Act, Prevention of Georgia EPD Mr. Jac Capp Correspondence Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program Manager sent on 12/12/12 to Review Stationary Source Permitting introduce the EEC

Program Expansion Project. Air Protection Branch Environmental Protection Division 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354-3906 404-363-7000

Page 44: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

EEC EXPANSION PROJECT

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

National Pollutant Discharge GDNR Coastal District, Brunswick Office To be submitted Elimination System (NPDES) Georgia EPD prior to Permit for Stormwater Discharges One Conservation Way construction . from Construction Activities Brunswick, GA 31520-8687 (General Permit No. GAR 100002) 912-264-7284

National Historic Preservation Act GDNR, Historic Preservation Dr. David Crass Correspondence (NHPA), Section 106 Consultation Division Historic Preservation Division sent on 12/7/12 to

Georgia Department of Natural introduce the EEC Resources Expansion Project 34 Peachtree St. NW and to request Atlanta, GA 30303 review of survey 404-656-2840 methodologies.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Cherokee of Georgia Tribal Chief Tall Oak Martin Consultation to be

Council conducted in Cherokee of Georgia Tribal coordination with Council Georgia SHPO. PO Box 1019

Saint George, GA 31562 NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Creek Nation of Oklahoma Bill S. Fife, Principal Chief Consultation to be

conducted in P.O. Box 580 coordination with Okmulgee, Oklahoma 74447 Georgia SHPO.

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Eastern Band of Cherokee Principal Chief Michell Hicks Consultation to be

Indians conducted in P.O. Box 455 coordination with Cherokee, North Carolina 28719 Georgia SHPO.

828-497 -7000 NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Georgia Tribe of Eastern Dr. Lucian Lamar Sneed Consultation to be

Cherokee conducted in Historian and Administrative coordination with Director Georgia SHPO. Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee

P.O. Box 1915

Cumming , GA 30028

770-888-9856

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Lower Muscogee Creek Tribe Chief Vonnie McCormick Consultation to be conducted in

Lower Muscogee Creek Tribe coordination with Route 2, Box 360 Whigham, Georgia SHPO. GA 39897

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Tim Thompson, Cultural Advisor Consultation to be

Oklahoma conducted in P.O. Box 580 coordination with Okmulgee, OK 74447 Georgia SHPO.

918-756-8700

NHPA, Section 106 Consultation Poarch Creek Indians Chairman Buford Rolin Consultation to be

5811 Jack Springs Road conducted in coordination with

Atmore, AL 36502 Georgia SHPO.

334-368-9136

Page 45: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix C Public Affairs Overview

Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project

Page 46: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix C

Public Affairs Overview

Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project

Companies understand that stakeholder outreach and public consultation are cornerstones of successful energy infrastructure projects. The public affairs team has developed a comprehensive, proactive stakeholder outreach and public participation plan, using an underlying principle: Open, honest, proactive communication is simply the right thing to do. Companies strive to continue to be good neighbors and good corporate citizens and believes that every person, organization, and institution that might be affected by the project should be informed and should have an opportunity to participate in the decisions that might affect them. The key objective of outreach is to keep the public informed about the liquefaction project.

To meet these objectives, the public affairs team will:

• Identify all affected key stakeholders.

• Establish channels for two-way communication throughout the life of the project.

• Allow for public input at critical stages of planning.

The public affairs plan is designed to reach a wide range of audiences and affected stakeholders, including:

• Landowners • Federal, state and local elected officials • Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies • County and municipal planning organizations • Farm bureaus • Environmental/conservation groups • Economic development agencies/chambers of commerce • Local law enforcement agencies • Local media outlets • Community at large

The public affairs team will employ the following strategies and tactics to accomplish the objectives mentioned above:

Information materials. The team will develop messages and materials to inform stakeholders about the project. These materials include:

• Project fact sheets • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

• Project fact card

• Project maps • Power Point presentation (used at community meetings and with elected officials)

Page 47: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Media outreach. The team will keep media informed through regular contact and updates. In addition, team members will invite media to speaking engagements, such as service club meetings, where media members can receive project updates.

Website. In addition to serving as a repository for up-to-date materials and information, the project website will feature mechanisms for stakeholders to receive a more in-depth look at the project and have the ability to ask questions and provide input into the project.

Strong and regular community relations at the local level. Beyond the scope of required public outreach activities, the public affairs team members will focus on the importance of stronger community relations, enhanced involvement at the local level, integrated government affairs, and proactively reaching all stakeholders on a regular basis.

In addition to updating local residents and stakeholders through media, speaking engagements and direct outreach, the team will work closely with affected local service clubs for presentations, other local organizations and schools to better engage with community members.

Page 48: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix D SLNG and ELC

Telephone and E-Mail Outreach

Page 49: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix D

SLNG and ELC - Outreach via Telephone and/or E-mail

Office/Org Title First Name Last Name Address City State Zip Notification re:1/28/13 News Release

Chatham County Commissioner Priscillia Thomas PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

Chatham County Commissioner Dean Kicklighter PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

Chatham County Commissioner David Gellatly PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

Chatham County Commissioner Lori Brady PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

Chatham County Commissioner James Holmes PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

Chatham County Commissioner Pat Farrell PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail and phone 31412

Chatham County Commissioner Helen Stone PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail and phone 31412

Chatham County County Manager Russ Abolt 124 Bull Street Savannah, GA e-mail and phone to 31401 staff

Chatham County Chairman AI Scott PO Box 8161 Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Commission 31412

Chatham Emergency Director Clayton Scott 124 Bull Street Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Management Agency 31401

City of Savannah Mayor Edna B. Jackson PO Box 1027 Savannah, GA personal contact and 31402 e-mail

City of Savannah Acting City Stephanie Cutter PO Box 1027 Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Manager 31402

City of Savannah Alderman Carol Bell 201 East Bolton Savannah, GA e-mail Street 31401

City of Savannah Alderman Tom Bordeaux 126 East Uberty Savannah, GA e-mail Street 31401

City of Savannah Alderman Van Johnson PO Box 9141 Savannah, GA e-mail 31412

City of Savannah Alderman Mary Osborne 642 East 41 st Street Savannah, GA e-mail 31401

City of Savannah Alderman John Hall 3301 Hazel Street Savannah, GA e-mail 31404

City of Savannah Alderman Mary Ellen Sprague 40 East 45th Street Savannah, GA 3-mail 31405

City of Savannah Alderman Estella Edwards PO Box 23146 Savannah, GA e-mail Shabazz 31403

City of Savannah Alderman Tony Thomas 18 Vernonburg Ave Savannah, GA e-mail 31419

Georgia House State Rep. Ron Stephens 45 Cove Drive Savannah, GA e-mail and phone 31419

Page 50: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix D

Office/Org Title First Name Last Name Address City State Zip Notification re:1/28/13 News Release

Georgia House State Rep. Bill Hitchens 2440 Rincon-Stillwell Rincon, GA e-mail Rd. 31326

Georgia House State Rep. Mickey Stepens PO Box 5485 Savannah, GA e-mail 31414

Georgia House State Rep. Craig Gordon 102 Oglethorpe Prof Savannah, GA e-mail Ct Unit 4 31406

Georgia House State Rep. Ben Watson 1326 Eisenhower Savannah, GA e-mail Drive #2 31406

Georgia House Rep. Bob Bryant 4110 4th Street Garden City, e-mail GA 31408

Georgia Ports Director of Jamie McCurry 2 Main Street e-mail and phone Authority Administration

Georgia Senate Senator Buddy Carter 406 Purple Finch Pooler, GA e-mail Drive 31322

Georgia Senate Senator Lester Jackson 1501 Abercorn Street Savannah, GA e-mail 31401

Memorial Health Vice President Becky Keightley 4700 Waters Ave Savannah, GA e-mail and phone 31404

River Pilots Tommy Brown 550 E. York Street Savannah, GA phone 31412

Savannah Area President Bill Hubbard 101 East Bay Street Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Chamber of 31401 Commerce

Savannah Chatham Superintendent Thom Lockamy 208 East Bull Street Savannah, GA personal contact and County Public 31401 e-mail School System

Savannah Chatham Director Tom Thompson PO Box 8246 Savannah, GA personal contact and MPC 31412-8246 e-mail

Savannah Economic CEO Trip Tollison 131 Hutchinson Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Development Island Rd. #4 31421 Authority

Savannah Fire Chief Middleton 1212 E. Oglethorpe Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Ave 31401

Savannah Maritime Charlie Sutlive 33 Bull Street Savannah, GA phone Asso 31401

Savannah Morning Publisher Mike Traynor PO Box 1028 Savannah, GA personal contact and News 31402 e-mail

Savannah Morning Editor Tom Barton PO Box 1028 Savannah, GA e-mail News 31402

Savannah Morning Reporter Mary Landers PO Box 1028 Savannah, GA Press release and News 31402 phone from

Communications Dept.

Southside Fire Chief Wesley Meadows 2225 Norwood Savannah, GA e-mail and phone Avenue 31406

State of Georgia Governor Nathan Deal 203 State Capitol Atlanta, GA e-mail and phone to 30334 staff

Page 51: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix D

Offlce/Org Title First Name Last Name Address City State Zip Notification re:1/28/13 News Release

U.S. Coast Guard Commander of Joe Loring 100 W Oglethorpe Savannah, GA e-mail and phone the Port Ave. Suite 1017 31401

U.S. House of Rep. Jack Kingston 2372 Rayburn HOB Washington, e-mail and phone to Representatives DC 20515 staff U.S. House of Rep. John Barrow 2202 Rayburn HOB Washington, e-mail and phone to Representatives DC 20515 staff U.S. Senate Senator Johnny Isakson 131 Russell Senate Washington, e-mail and phone to

Office Building DC 20510 staff U.S. Senate Senator Saxby Chambliss 416 Russell Senate Washington, e-mail and phone to

Office Building DC 20510 staff Civic Leader Howard Morrison e-mail and phone

Page 52: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix E SLNG and EEC

Outreach Meetings Held

Page 53: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix E

Office/Org Title Meetings Held

Atlanta Gas Light Wendell Dallas 1/31/2013

sda r of Andrea Dove 12/18/2012

sda President David Tribble 12/18/2012

Chatham County Commissioner Pat Farrell

Chatham County Commissioner Dean Kicklighter PO Box 8161

Chatham County Commissioner Helen Stone PO Box 8161 1/31/2013

Chatham County Commissioner Priscillia Thomas PO Box 8161 1/31/2013

Chatha m Cou nty Chairman AI Scott PO Box 8161 1/28/2013; Commission 1/31/2013

City of Savannah City Manager Stephanie Cutter PO Box 1027 1/28/2013

City of Savannah Alderman Estella rds PO Box 23146 1/31/2013

City of Savannah Mayor Edna B. Jackson PO Box 1027 1/28/2013

City of Savannah Alderman Sprague 1/31/2013

City of Savannah City Attorney Brooks Stillwell 1/31/2013

City of Savannah Alderman Tony Thomas 1/31/2013

City of Savannah Assistant to Sharonte Turner 1/28/2013

Department of Board Member Ann Purcell 600 W Peachtree Atlanta, GA 404-631- 2/6/2013 Transportation Street, NE 1000

Georgia DNR Commissioner Mark Williams 2 Martin Luther Atlanta, GA 30334 2/6/2013 King Jr. Drive,

Page 54: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix E

Office/Org Title First Name

Last Name Address City State Zip Phone Meetings Held

Georgia Ports Director of Jamie McCurry P. O. Box 2406 Savannah, GA 912-963- 1/31/2013 Authoritv Administration 31402 5562 Georgia Power Vice President Cathy Hill 1/31/2013 Georgia Senate Senator Buddy Carter 406 Purple Finch Pooler, GA 31322 912-748- 1/28/2013

Drive 1414

Georgia Senate Senator Lester Jackson 1501 Abercorn Savannah, GA 912-233- 1/28/2013; Street 31401 7970 2/6/2013

Georgia Senate Senator David Shafer 421 State Capitol Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656- 2/6/2013 0048

Oatland Island Director Heather Merber 711 Sandtown Rd Savannah, GA 912-395- 12/19/2012 Wildlife Center 31410 1212 Representative Georgia District Brianna Foran 2372 Rayburn Washington, DC 202-225- 12/20/2012; Jack Kingston's 1 HOB 5831 1/28/2013 Dffice River Pilots Savannah, Tommy Brown 550 E. York Savannah, GA 912-236- 1/28/2013

Master Pilot Street 31412 0226 Savannah Business Tiny Hinson 101 East Bay Savannah, GA 912-644- 1/31/2013 Chamber of Development Street 31401 6421

1(' M.,. ... .,.,.,,... ...

Savannah President and Bill Hubbard 101 East Bay Savannah, GA 912-644- 12/18/2012; Chamber of CEO Street 31401 6421 1/28/2013; Commerce 1/3112013 Savannah Community Drew Hunt 101 East Bay Savannah, GA 912-644- 12/18/2012 Chamber of Relations Street 31401 6421 Commerce Manaaer Savannah Superintendent Thom Lockamy 208 East Bull Savannah, GA 912-395- 1/28/2013 Chatham County Street 31401 5600 Public School

lC:;vc:;tpm

Savannah City Director Bret Bell 2 E. Bay Street Savannah, GA 912-651- 12/18/2012; Hall 31401 6410 1128/2013 Savannah CEO Trip Tollison 131 Hutchinson Savannah, GA 912-447- 12/19/2012; Economic Island Rd. #4 31421 8450 1/28/2013 Development Al .~

Savannah Fire Chief Middleton 121 E. Savannah, GA 912-651- 1/28/2013 Oalethoroe Ave 31401 6757

Savannah Metro Executive Tom Thomson 912-651- 1/31/2013 Planning Director, 1440 Commission Chatham County

Savannah Publisher Mike Traynor PO Box 1028 Savannah, GA 912-652- 1/28/2013 Morninq News 31402 0268 Savannah- Director of Sean Mulvanity 208 Bull Street Savannah, GA 912-395- 12/19/2012 Chatham Public Science 31401 1125 Schools Speaker of House David Ralston 332 State Capitol Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656- 2/6/2013

5020 State of Georgia Lt. Governor Casey Cagle 240 Capitol Atlanta, GA 404-656- 2/6/2013

30334 5030 State of Georgia Governor Nathan Deal 203 State Capitol Atlanta, GA 404-656- 1/28/2013

30334 1776

Page 2

Page 55: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Appendix E

Office/Org Title First Name

Last Name Address City State Zip Phone Meetings Held

State of Georgia Representative Roger Fleming 2/6/2013

State of Georgia Energy Advisor Dan Regenstein 203 State Capitol Atlanta, GA 404-656- 1/28/2013 30334 1776

State of Georgia Governor's Chief Chris Riley 203 State Capitol Atlanta, GA 404-656- 1/28/2013 of Staff 30334 1776

State of Georgia Deputy Edward Tate 1/28/2013 Executive Counsel

U.S. Coast Guard Commander of Joe Loring 100 W Savannah, GA 912-652- 1/28/2013 the Port Oglethorpe Ave. 31401 4353

Suite 1017

U.S. House of District Director Merritt Myers 324 Hart Senate Washington, DC 1/28/2013 Representatives Office Building 20510

U.S. House of Rep. Jack Kingston 2372 Rayburn Washington, DC 1/28/2013 Representatives HOB 20515

U.S. Senate Regional Repr Kathryn Murph 1058 Claussen Augusta, GA 706-738- 1/28/2013 for Senator Road, Suite 105 30907 0302 IChambliss

U.S. Senate Senator Saxby Chambliss 416 Russell Washington, DC 202-224- 1/28/2013 Senate Office 20510 3521 Buildina

U.S. Senate Senator Johnny Isakson 131 Russell Washington, DC 202-224- 1/28/2013 Senate Office 20510 3643 IBuildina

U.S. Senate State Director Camilla Knowles 1/28/2013 U.S. Senate Energy Advisor Rachel McLocklin 131 Russell Washington, DC 202-224- 1/28/2013

Senate Office 20510 3643 Buildina

U.S. Senate Energy Advisor Michael Quiello 131 Hutchinson Savannah, GA 912-447- 1/28/2013 Island Rd. #4 31421 8450

Page 3

Page 56: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20426

OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS In Reply Refer To:OEP/DG2E/Gas 1Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. & Elba Express Company, L.L.C.Docket No. PF13-3-000

March 1, 2013

Glenn A. SheffieldDirector – Rates & RegulatorySouthern LNG Company, L.L.C.569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749Birmingham, AL 35209

Re: Approval of Pre-Filing Request

Dear Mr. Sheffield:

Thank you for providing supplemental information, filed February 25, 2013,regarding Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and Elba Express Company, L.L.C.’s(Companies) December 5, 2012 request to use of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) pre-filing review process for the planned Elba Liquefaction and EEC Expansion Projects. The supplemental information is responsive to my December 14, 2012 letter regarding the Companies’ original request.

As stated in your letter, the Companies plan to construct and operate a two-phased liquefaction/liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project at the existing Elba LNG Terminal, in Chatham County, near Savannah, Georgia. The projects would involve: (a) liquefaction facilities to support production and export of up to 350 million cubic feet of LNG per day (2.5 million tons per year) at the Elba Terminal; (b) installation of up to 16, 000 horsepower of compression at the existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia; and (c) construction of a new 11,000 horsepower compressor station and about 1,000 feet of interconnecting pipeline in Jefferson County, Georgia.

Your letter also stated that the Companies intend to file applications in December2013. When the Companies file the applications with the Commission, we will evaluate the progress made during the pre-filing process, based in part on our success in resolving the issues raised during scoping. Once we determine that your applications are ready for processing, we will establish a schedule for completion of the environmental document and for the issuance of all other federal authorizations.

20130301-3055 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 03/01/2013

Page 57: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Docket No. PF13-3-000 - 2 -

My staff has reviewed the proposals submitted for the selection of a third-party contractor to assist us in preparing the National Environmental Policy Act documentation.We have selected Merjent, Inc. (Merjent) as the third-party contractor to work under the direct supervision and control of the Commission staff. I request that you proceed with executing a contract with Merjent so work may begin as soon as possible. We expect that Merjent will be available to assist us during the Companies’ Open House meetings the week of March 12, 2013.

If you have any questions, please contact the Office of Energy Projects’ Environmental Project Manager for your projects, Christine Allen at (202) 502-6847.

Sincerely,

Jeff WrightDirectorOffice of Energy Projects

cc: Public File, Docket No. PF13-3-000

20130301-3055 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 03/01/2013

Page 58: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Document Content(s)

PF13-3.DOC............................................................1-2

20130301-3055 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 03/01/2013

Page 59: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

U.S. Coast Guard

(USCG)

Page 60: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 61: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 62: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 63: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 64: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 65: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 66: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 67: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

U.S. Department of Transportation

(DOT),

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety

Administration

(PHMSA)

Page 68: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration East Building, 2nd Floor Mail Stop: E24-455 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4595 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 69: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USDOT December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 70: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USDOT December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 71: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 72: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 73: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 74: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 75: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 76: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration East Building, 2nd Floor Mail Stop: E24-455 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4595 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 77: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USDOT December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. DOT, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the

Page 78: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USDOT December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 79: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 80: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 81: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 82: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 83: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

From:                                         [email protected] Sent:                                           Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:57 AM To:                                               Thomas, David/ATL Cc:                                               [email protected][email protected]

[email protected] Subject:                                     RE: Elba Liquefaction Project correspondence   

Good Morning Mr. Thomas:    Thank you for the attached Correspondence – I will forward your request to Ms. Melanie Barber, Emergency Support and Response Officer, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA.    Respectfully,    

  Joemo Roye 

Senior Administrative Assistant UniSpec Enterprises, Inc./Contractor U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials  Safety Administration Office of Pipeline Safety - Contractor 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC  20590 Phone:  202-366-4595 Fax:  202-493-2311 www.unispec1.com [email protected]   Follow PHMSA on Twitter: 

     

  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:06 AM To: Roye, Joemo CTR (PHMSA) Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project correspondence   Mr. Roye: 

Page 1 of 2

3/27/2013file://C:\Users\jripley\Desktop\Correspondence for Dave\DOT-PHMSA\RE Elba Liquefact...

Page 84: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

  As we discussed in our phone conversation this morning, I am providing a revised version of the correspondence sent via FedEx dated December 7, 2012.  The attached correspondence correctly requests review and response from USDOT‐PHMSA.   Thank you for your consideration,     David Thomas, CEP CH2M HILL  Northpark 400 1000 Abernathy Road Atlanta, GA 30328 Ph: 678.530.4350 cell: 678.314.2871     

Page 2 of 2

3/27/2013file://C:\Users\jripley\Desktop\Correspondence for Dave\DOT-PHMSA\RE Elba Liquefact...

Page 85: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

DOT.02222013.PHONE_LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D Southern LNG Elba Liquefaction Project

Call To: Melanie Barber, DOT

Phone No.: 912-832-8739 Date: 02/22/2013

Call From: Jason Wallace Time: 1:20 PM

Message Taken By: Jason Wallace

Subject: FERC Pre-Filing Participation/ Status of Project Review

Project No.: 456777

I spoke with Melanie Barber discussing DOT’s decision on participating in the FERC/NEPA Pre-Filing Process and the status of the DOT’s initial review of the proposed Project. Melanie indicated that she didn’t think she would be the Project Manager (PM) for the Project. She asked me to email her the introductory letter and she would send along the change to determine who would be the PM, the Project #, and whether DOT would participate in the FERC/NEPA Pre-Filing Process. The introductory letter was emailed on 2/22/2013.

Page 86: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

(USFWS)

Page 87: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USFWS.12.6.12.PHONE.LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D Southern LNG Elba Liquefaction Project

Call To: Strant Colwell, USFWS

Phone No.: 912-832-8739 Date: 12/6/12

Call From: D. Thomas Time: 2:30 PM

Message Taken By: VM

Subject: Project introduction

Project No.: 456777

I left a voice mail with Strant Colwell introducing the Project and letting him know he would be receiving additional information about the Project and the pre-filing process in a letter. I left him my contact information and asked him to call me to discuss further.

Page 88: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Strant Colwell, Supervisory Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Georgia Ecological Services Coastal Georgia Sub Office 4890 Wildlife Drive NE Townsend, Georgia 31331 912.832.8739

Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Colwell:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 89: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Mr. Strant Colwell December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 90: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Mr. Strant Colwell December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 91: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 92: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 93: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 94: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 95: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

(NOAA)

National Marine Fisheries Service

(NMFS)

Page 96: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

NOAA.12.7.12.PHONE.LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D Southern LNG Elba Export Project

Call To: NOAA Fisheries

Phone No.: 843.762.8601 Date: 12/7/2012

Call From: D. Thomas Time: 4:30

Message Taken By: Pace Wilber

Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project

Project No.: 456777

I called Mr. Wilber to inform him that Southern LNG had filed a request with FERC on 12/5 to use the Commission’s pre-filing process for a new project proposed for the Elba LNG Terminal, and that he should be receiving a letter describing the project on Monday. We discussed potential wetland and waterbody impacts and whether the project would require a Corps permit. He said that he would review the project description and determine whether to participate in the FERC pre-filing process or just coordinate with the Corps.

Page 97: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 NOAA Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Branch Pace Wilber Atlantic Branch Supervisor 217 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, SC 29412 843-762-8601 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Wilber:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 98: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Pace Wilber December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 99: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Pace Wilber December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 100: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 101: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 102: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 103: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 104: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 105: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 NOAA Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Branch Pace Wilber Atlantic Branch Supervisor 217 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, SC 29412 843-762-8601 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Wilber:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 106: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Pace Wilber December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that NOAA Fisheries Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 107: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Pace Wilber December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 108: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 109: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 110: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 111: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 112: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

(USACE),

Savannah District

Page 113: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

USACE.12.6.12.PHONE.LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D Southern LNG Elba Liquefaction Project

Call To: Kelly Finch, USACE

Phone No.: 912.652.5503 Date: 12/6/12

Call From: D. Thomas Time: 2:30 PM

Message Taken By: Kelly Finch

Subject: Project introduction

Project No.: 456777

I introduced the Project to Ms. Finch and let her know that we would be sending a letter with more Project information, an anticipated schedule, and information about the FERC pre-filing process, but wanted to make her aware of the Project since we were not following our normal order of Project notifications. She asked that we send the letter with an invitation to the Open House, and recommended that we attend the Interagency Review Team meetings if we determined that the Project would have more than minor impacts. The IRT meetings alternate between Coastal (Savannah) and Piedmont (Atlanta) on a monthly basis.

Page 114: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Kelly Finch, Acting Chief U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District, Coastal Branch 100 W. Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, GA 31402 912-652-5822 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Ms. Finch:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 115: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Kelly Finch December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 116: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Kelly Finch December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 117: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 118: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 119: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 120: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 121: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 122: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 Kelly Finch, Acting Chief U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District, Coastal Branch 100 W. Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, GA 31402 912-652-5822 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Ms. Finch:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 123: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Kelly Finch December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 124: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Kelly Finch December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 125: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 126: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 127: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 128: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 129: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 130: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 131: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Federal Emergency Management Agency

(FEMA),

Region IV

Page 132: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region IV 3003 Chamblee Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341 770.220.5200 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 133: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEMA Region IV December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 134: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEMA Region IV December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 135: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 136: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 137: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 138: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 139: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 140: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region IV 3003 Chamblee Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341 770.220.5200 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 141: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEMA Region IV December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 142: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEMA Region IV December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 143: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 144: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 145: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 146: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 147: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Georgia Department of Natural

Resources, Wildlife Resources Division

(GDNR, WRD)

Page 148: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

March 28, 2013 Katrina Morris, Environmental Review Coordinator Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division 2065 Highway 78 SE Social Circle, GA 30025 770.918.6411 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Company, LLC, Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.,

and Elba Express Company, L.L.C. Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Modification Project

Dear Ms. Morris:

Elba Liquefaction Company, LLC1 (“ELC”) and Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.2 (“SLNG”) (together “Companies”) are proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”) under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”). Additionally, SLNG is proposing to abandon its LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal under Section 7(b) of the NGA.

The Elba Liquefaction Project proposes to export domestically-sourced liquefied natural gas (LNG) on behalf of its customer. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia (32.086175, -80.995617), currently imports LNG using two liquefied natural gas carrier (LNGC) berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of 1 Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company formed by Southern Liquefaction Company, LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company, and unit of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P., and Shell US Gas & Power LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc.

2 Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company and unit of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. (“EPB”). Kinder Morgan, Inc. owns the general partner interest in EPB.

Page 149: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Katrina Morris March 28, 2013

peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to three major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 350,000 Mcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied, stored, and then loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the Project mapping included in Attachment 1.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Jefferson County, Georgia (33.152435, -82.269297), and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia (34.287413, -82.808240), by adding compression up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Modification Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities. Project mapping of the Jefferson County, Georgia site and the Hartwell Compressor Station existing footprint is located in Attachment 2.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Modification Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012 with a supplement on February 25, 2013, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA in Docket No. PF13-3FERC approved the Companies’ and EEC’s request on March 1, 2013. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – February 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – December 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – December 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – December 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal were last analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007 (Docket No. CP06-470). SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway

Page 150: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Katrina Morris March 28, 2013

Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

We have reviewed the Georgia DNR Wildlife Resources Division website for information on protected and rare species and natural communities in the project areas. The protected species list for the Elba Liquefaction Project is located in Attachment 3 and in Attachment 4 for the EEC Modification Project. This information will be used to assist our environmental surveys and evaluation of Project impacts on the natural community. On behalf of Companies and EEC, we respectfully request that the Georgia DNR provide us with information regarding any federal/state listed or candidate, threatened, or endangered species or suitable habitat that may occur within the proposed Project footprint. If possible, please indicate the distance and directions of any known occurrences within one mile of the Project boundaries. In addition, please review and comment on the enclosed list of T&E species.

We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Modification review phase for further consultation and review, and will forward your office copies of our survey results. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas

Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures: Attachment 1 - Elba Liquefaction Project Mapping Attachment 2 – EEC Modification Project Mapping Attachment 3 – Elba Liquefaction Project Protected Species Table Attachment 4 – EEC Modification Project Protected Species Table Cc: Tim McKellar/SLNG

Page 151: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Ms. Katrina Morris March 28, 2013

ATTACHMENT 1

Elba Liquefaction Project Mapping

Page 152: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 153: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Figure 1.1-1Elba Island FacilitiesElba Liquefaction ProjectElba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.Chatham County, Georgia

R:\GIS\HOU\Southern_LNG\Elba_Island\MapFiles\Project_Facilities.mxd gtwigg 3/28/2013 10:51:08 AM

PROJECT LOCATION

Notes:1. Transportation Source: Copyright:© 2013 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom2. Imagery Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community

Savannah R

iver

Sub-Station

Flare

0 1,500750

Feet

LegendLoading Arm Modifications

Flare and Sub-Station Location

Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units

Proposed Project Boundary

Page 154: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

ATTACHMENT 2

EEC Modification Project Mapping

Page 155: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Figure 1.2-1USGS Topographic Project Location MapElba Express Company L.L.C.Hart County, Georgia

PROJECT LOCATION

Notes:1. Sources: Esri, TomTom, Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, U.S. Department of

0 21

Miles

GEORGIA

FLORIDA

ALABAMA

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

TENNESSEELegendApproximate Project Location

DVR GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\GRIMSLEY_PROJECT_LOCATION_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/27/2013 11:33:32 AM

1 in = 2 miles

Page 156: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186 18

6

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

LegendElba Express Pipeline

Compressor WorkspaceExisting Hartwell Compressor Station Footprint

Access Road Workspace

Lateral Workspace

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

1 inch = 1,000 feet

DVR \\MNUSTRICTGFS01\PROJECTS\GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\GRIMSLEY_AERIAL_SITE_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/27/2013 4:02:57 PM

Source: Bing Maps Hybrid: (c) 2010 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers

Aerial Site MapElba Express Company L.L.C.

Hart County, Georgia

Page 157: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186 18

6

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

186

LegendElba Express Pipeline

Compressor WorkspaceExisting Hartwell Compressor Station Footprint

Access Road Workspace

Lateral Workspace

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

1 inch = 1,000 feet

Source: USA Topo Maps: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed

TOPO SITE MAPElba Express Company L.L.C.

Hart County, Georgia

DVR \\MNUSTRICTGFS01\PROJECTS\GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\HART_PARTNERS_TOPO_SITE_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/27/2013 11:35:10 AM

Page 158: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Figure 1.2-1USGS Topographic Project Location MapElba Express Company L.L.C.Jefferson County, Georgia

PROJECT LOCATION

Notes:1. Sources: Esri, TomTom, Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, U.S. Department of

0 21

Miles

GEORGIA

FLORIDA

ALABAMA

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

TENNESSEELegendApproximate Project Location

DVR GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\GRIMSLEY_PROJECT_LOCATION_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/22/2013 3:48:53 PM

1 in = 2 miles

Page 159: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

B ur k

e

J ef f

e rs o

nLegend

Noise Sensative Area

Elba Express Pipeline

USA Counties (below 1:3m)

Half Mile Buffer

Tract Boundary

Compressor WorkspacePermanent Footprint

Temporary Footprint

Access Road Workspace

Lateral Workspace

NHDFlowline

NHDWaterbody

NWI Wetland

650 0 650 1,300325

Feet

1 inch = 650 feet

Tract 0131-029Aerial Site Map

Elba Express Company L.L.C.Jefferson County, Georgia

DVR \\MNUSTRICTGFS01\PROJECTS\GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\ALTERNATIVE_SITE_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/27/2013 3:52:20 PM

Source: Bing Maps Aerial: (c) 2010 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers

Page 160: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

LegendCompressor Workspace

Permanent Footprint

Temporary Footprint

Access Road Workspace

Lateral Workspace

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

1 inch = 1,000 feet

DVR \\MNUSTRICTGFS01\PROJECTS\GIS\HOU\SOUTHERN_LNG\ELBA_EXPRESS_COMPANY\MAPFILES\GRIMSLEY_AERIAL_SITE_MAP.MXD AOMALLEY 3/22/2013 3:37:25 PM

Source: USA Topo Maps: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed

TOPO SITE MAPElba Express Company L.L.C.

Jefferson County, Georgia

Page 161: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

ATTACHMENT 3

Elba Liquefaction Project Protected Species Table

Page 162: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED ELBA LIQUEFACTION FACILITY IN CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name

Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitat a

Robust Redhorse

Moxostoma robustum -- SE

Riffles, runs, and pools. Have usually been found in association with (tree) snags, in moderate to swift current, often in deeper water near shore. Spawning occurs in rivers over coarse gravel bed sediments Adults are capable documented movements in excess of 100km.

Bluebarred Pygmy Sunfish

Elassoma okatie -- SE

Bluebarred pygmy sunfishes are known from slow-moving to stagnant, heavily vegetated areas within ditches, impoundments, creeks, and rivers. They are strongly associated with aquatic plants, including alligator weed, bladderwort, duckweed, grasses, pondweed, rushes, and spatterdock. Waters are typically tea-stained and acidic.

Shortnose Sturgeon

Acipenser brevirostrum FE SE

This fish inhabits large coastal rivers, though it does occasionally enter the Atlantic Ocean. Spawning typically occurs in freshwater, mid-channel areas of river bends over coarse substrates, such as rock and gravel, with current velocities of 52 – 104 cm/sec.

West Indian Manatee

Trichechus manatus FE SE

In Georgia, manatees can be found in any tidal waters from March through October. Habitats in Georgia include nearshore ocean waters, tidal creeks, estuaries, and the lower reaches of the St. Mary’s, Satilla, Altamaha, Ogeechee, and Savannah Rivers.

North Atlantic Right Whale

Eubalaena glacialis FE SE

The current range is centered along the Canadian and U.S. Atlantic coasts from Nova Scotia to Florida, although sightings in the Gulf of Mexico and off Greenland and Scandinavia are reported rarely. Scientists speculate that the shallow, sheltered, cool waters off Georgia and Florida present habitat characteristics that are particularly conducive to right whale calving and nursing.

Gopher Frog Rana capito FR SR

In Georgia, the gopher frog is restricted to longleaf pine ecosystems. It occurs in sandy and well drained, longleaf pine - saw palmetto – wiregrass sandhills as well as more poorly drained longleaf pine flatwoods.

Flatwoods Salamander

Ambystoma cingulatum FE SE

This salamander is endemic to mesic flatwoods habitats within the vanishing longleaf pine-wiregrass community. Breeding sites are typically shallow, ephemeral cypress and/or swamp tupelo ponds or "domes," although flooded borrow pits, roadside ditches, and deep firebreaks are occasionally used.

Page 163: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED ELBA LIQUEFACTION FACILITY IN CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name

Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitat a

Eastern Indigo Snake

Drymarchon corais couperi FT ST

In Georgia, the species is strongly associated with the xeric sandridge habitat. The species is probably most strongly associated with longleaf pine-scrub oak communities, with long leaf pine, turkey oak, and wiregrass. Additionally, the species is intimately associated with the gopher tortoise, as the species utilizes tortoise burrows for refuge and overwintering sites.

Gopher Tortoise

Gopherus polyphemus

FC* ST

Along with sandy soil for burrowing, sunlight availability and abundant herbaceous vegetation are the key habitat requirements for this reptile. Gopher tortoises are a characteristic species of the rapidly disappearing longleaf pine and wiregrass community, which includes sandhills, dry flatwoods, and turkey oak scrub.

Green Sea Turtle

Chelonia mydas FE ST

Green turtles are found in oceanic habitat as post-hatchlings and juveniles. They are generally associated with concentrations of sargassum weed found in oceanic convergence zones. When they reach a carapace length of approximately 20 to 25 cm (8-10 in), they leave the oceanic habitat and move into shallow coastal waters where they feed on sea grasses and algae. In Georgia, juveniles have been documented foraging on macroalgae found on docks and jetties. During the nesting season, adults may be found in proximity to nesting beaches.

Loggerhead Sea Turtle

Caretta caretta FT SE

Loggerheads are found throughout the marine and estuarine waters of Georgia during the warm months of spring, summer, and fall. They have been observed swimming or basking on the surface as far as the Gulf Stream, 104 km (62.4 mi) offshore, and are seen regularly as close as the creeks and tidal rivers of Georgia's extensive saltmarshes.

Spotted Turtle Clemmys guttata -- SU

Heavily vegetated, shallow wetlands with standing or slowly flowing water are the typical habitat for the spotted turtle. These include Carolina bays, bogs, swamps, marshes, wet meadows, and even tidally-influenced brackish streams. Wetlands with a soft, mucky substrate seem to be preferred. During certain times of the year, spotted turtles spend a considerable amount of time on land. Unfortunately, upland habitat requirements are not well understood.

Diamondback Terrapin

Malaclemys terrapin -- SU

Coastal marshes, tidal flats, coves, estuaries, and lagoons behind barrier beaches; brackish and salt water (but basically retricted to estuarine situations; intolerant of long-term exposure to freshwater or 100% salt water). Burrows into mud when inactive; in Virginia, has been observed hibernating in moist sand 8 m from the high tide mark. May venture into grassy lowlands at high tide.

Page 164: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED ELBA LIQUEFACTION FACILITY IN CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name

Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitat a

Kemps Ridley Sea Turtle

Lepidochelys kempii FE SE

Habitat of adults primarily includes shallow coastal and estuarine waters, often over sandy or muddy bottoms where crab are numerous. Most adults stay in the Gulf of Mexico, and they are rare along the Atlantic coast of the northeastern United States.

Leatherback Sea Turtle

Dermochelys coriacea FE SE

Leatherback sea turtles are highly pelagic, but may also forage in coastal waters. Leatherbacks make long-distance migrations from nesting sites in the tropics to foraging sites in the sub-Arctic. Leatherbacks are found along the Georgia coast during annual migrations in the fall and spring. They are also commonly seen in the winter months foraging on sea jellies.

Least Tern Sternula antillarum -- SR

Today many nesting colonies make use of agricultural fields, parking lots, sand and gravel pits, dredge spoil sites, bare land associated with airports, and flat gravel rooftops. Use of these sites may be an adaptation to human disturbance on beaches where traditional nesting sites were located. Much of the breeding population in Georgia uses dredge-spoil islands and gravel rooftops of large buildings. Foraging habitat of coastal populations includes bays, estuaries, inlets, river mouths, fresh water ponds, and shallow near-shore ocean waters.

Black Skimmer

Rynchops niger -- SR

Black Skimmers form breeding colonies on beaches, sandbars, dredge spoil islands, and marsh islands. They prefer sparsely vegetated, sandy substrates and often nest in close association with gulls and terns. In areas where such habitat is lacking, they may nest on the wrack line in saltmarsh. Foraging habitat includes bays, estuaries, tidal creeks and rivers, saltmarsh pools, and other shallow coastal waters, usually within 5 km (3 mi) of the nesting site.

Wood Stork Mycteria americana FE SE

Wood storks use a variety of freshwater and estuarine wetlands for breeding, feeding, and roosting. They are colonial nesters, and several nests are often located in the same tree. Colony size in Georgia has ranged from fewer than 12 to more than 500 nests. Nests may be located in large or small trees; but the trees must be in standing water or on islands surrounded by water.

Page 165: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED ELBA LIQUEFACTION FACILITY IN CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name

Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitat a

American Oystercatcher

Haematopus palliatus -- SR

This species exists on the highly dynamic edge of estuarine and marine coastal environments throughout its range, rarely straying any distance from saltwater. In Georgia preferred nesting sites are areas of beach with broad sandy berms or terraced flats that are above the mean (average) high tide line. These areas often occur at the northern or southern ends of barrier islands and at the tips of sand spits near inlets.

Swallow-Tailed Kite

Elanoides forficatus -- SR

This kite nests in trees that emerge above the surrounding forest, which in Georgia are typically very large pines found in small “pine islands” within floodplain or riparian forest, or in older stands of pine forest adjacent to floodplains of large rivers or tributary creeks. Foraging habitats include bottomland forests, cypress and mixed cypress-hardwood swamps, hardwood hammocks, pine flatwoods, pine forests bordering riparian areas, freshwater and brackish marshes, wet prairies, sloughs, and pastures.

Piping Plover Charadrius melodus FT ST

Breeding birds nesting along the Great Lakes, larger inland lakes in the northern Great Plains, and along the Atlantic Coast prefer sparsely vegetated sandy beaches, gravel, or cobble; frequently near sand dunes. Wintering areas include beaches, mudflats, and tidal ponds that are periodically inundated by water from high tide.

Wilson’s Plover

Charadrius wilsonia -- ST

Coastal beach habitats including dry sand beaches, dunes, newly forming beaches, intertidal sand flats, mudflats, saltpans, and coastal lagoons. Breeding habitat in Georgia is primarily on the outer barrier island beaches, with limited nesting on dredge deposit sites.

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus

leucocephalus BGEPA ST Prefers large, mature trees that are easily accessible for nesting and close to large bodies of water and fresh to intermediate marshes for foraging.

Red-Cockaded Woodpecker

Picoides borealis FE SE

This small woodpecker needs large expanses of mature, open pine forest, particularly longleaf, slash, or loblolly pine. Nest and roost cavities are excavated only in old living pines, and the process may take several years to complete. Trees selected for cavities are usually infected with red heart fungus, which softens the heartwood, making excavation easier. The habitat that probably supported the largest populations historically was the fire-maintained longleaf pine forest of the Coastal Plain.

Savannah lilliput

Toxolasma pullus -- ST

Typically found in shallow water near the banks of streams, rivers, ponds, and lakes with little flow. This species is usually found in soft substrates such as mud, silty sand, and sand.

Page 166: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED ELBA LIQUEFACTION FACILITY IN CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name

Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitat a

Pondberry Lindera melissifolia FE --

Generally associated with wetland habitats such as bottomland and hardwoods in the interior areas, and the margins of sinks, ponds and other depressions in the more coastal sites. The plants generally grow in shaded areas but may also be found in full sun.

* Candidate for listing in Georgia and eastern part of range; Threatened west of Tombigbee and Mobile Rivers in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana aSource: USFWS IPAC website (http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/wizard/trustResourceList!prepare.action) Georgia Department of Natural Resources – Wildlife Division website (http://georgiawildlife.com/sites/default/files/uploads/wildlife/nongame/text/html/cnty_eos/chatham.html) bLegal Status: Federal: Species with the Statuses of FE (Federal Endangered), FT (Federal Threatened), FC (Federal Candidate), FR (Federal Rare), BGEPA (Bald Eagle Protection Act) are legally protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973. Georgia: Species with the Statuses of SE (State Endangered), ST (State Threatened), SR (Rare Species), SC (Special Concern), State Unusual (SU) Are Legally Protected under the Georgia Endangered Wildlife (1973) and the Georgia Wildflower Preservation Act (1973).

Page 167: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

ATTACHMENT 4

EEC Modification Project Protected Species Table

Page 168: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED EEC MODIFICATION PROJECT SITES  

IN HART AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitata

Hart County

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus

leucocephalus BGEPA ST

Prefers large, mature trees that are easily accessible for nesting and close to large bodies of water and fresh to intermediate marshes for foraging.

Sandbar Shiner Notropis scepticus -- SR

The sandbar shiner is found over sandy bottoms in flowing pools near gravel rocky riffles in medium-sized streams. It usually avoids small headwater tributaries, large rivers and reservoirs.

Jefferson County

Spotted Turtle Clemmys guttata -- SU

Heavily vegetated, shallow wetlands with standing or slowly flowing water are the typical habitat for the spotted turtle. These include Carolina bays, bogs, swamps, marshes, wet meadows, and even tidally-influenced brackish streams. Wetlands with a soft, mucky substrate seem to be preferred.

Bluebarred Pygmy Sunfish

Elassoma okatie -- SE

Bluebarred pygmy sunfishes are known from slow-moving to stagnant, heavily vegetated areas within ditches, impoundments, creeks, and rivers. They are strongly associated with aquatic plants, including alligator weed, bladderwort, duckweed, grasses, pondweed, rushes, and spatterdock. Waters are typically tea-stained and acidic.

Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni -- SE

The preferred habitat for this species is coarse sand and gravel at the downstream end of riffles. This species is rarely found in substrates of fine sand and silt or mud.

Southeastern Pocket Gopher

Geomys pinetis -- ST

Pocket gophers require loose, sandy, well-drained soil for burrow construction and an abundant supply of grasses and forbs for food. They are native to areas of upland coastal plain longleaf pine forest, including rolling hills and sandhills, particularly where frequent fires maintain conditions that favor the growth of groundcover plants.

Gopher Tortoise Gopherus

polyphemus FC SE

Along with sandy soil for burrowing, sunlight availability and abundant herbaceous vegetation are the key habitat requirements for this reptile. Gopher tortoises are a characteristic species of the rapidly disappearing longleaf pine and wiregrass community, which includes sandhills, dry flatwoods, and turkey oak scrub.

Page 169: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

FEDERAL AND STATE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT POTENTIALLY OCCUR AT THE PROPOSED EEC MODIFICATION PROJECT SITES  

IN HART AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, GEORGIA 

Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status b

Georgia Status b Suitable Habitata

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus

leucocephalus BGEPA ST

Prefers large, mature trees that are easily accessible for nesting and close to large bodies of water and fresh to intermediate marshes for foraging.

Southern Hognose Snake

Heterodon simus -- ST

Southern hognose snakes are most often associated with well drained, xeric, sandy soils where longleaf pine and/or scrub oaks (especially turkey oak) are the characteristic woody vegetation. Wiregrass is often a significant component of the groundcover. Such habitats are necessarily fire-maintained. Ruderal habitats, including fallow fields, may also be used.

Red-Cockaded Woodpecker

Picoides borealis FE SE

This small woodpecker needs large expanses of mature, open pine forest, particularly longleaf, slash, or loblolly pine. Nest and roost cavities are excavated only in old living pines, and the process may take several years to complete. Trees selected for cavities are usually infected with red heart fungus, which softens the heartwood, making excavation easier.

Gopher Frog Rana capito -- SR

In Georgia, the gopher frog is restricted to longleaf pine ecosystems. It occurs in sandy and well drained, longleaf pine - saw palmetto - wiregrass sandhills as well as more poorly drained longleaf pine flatwoods.

Indian Olive Nestronia umbellula -- SR Dry, open, upland woods with mixed hardwood-pine canopy.

Cutleaf Beartongue Penstemon dissectus -- SR Altamaha Grit outcrops and surrounding longleaf pine woodland.

Yellow Trumpets Pitcherplant

Sarracenia flava -- SU Wet savannas and pine flatwoods, seepage slopes, and bogs.

Sweet Pitcherplant Sarracenia rubra -- ST

Bogs, seepy stream banks, wet savannas, Atlantic white cedar swamps, wet pine flatwoods; powerlines and ditches through these habitats.

aSource: USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System IPaC website (http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/) Georgia Department of Natural Resources – Wildlife Division website (http://georgiawildlife.com/sites/default/files/uploads/wildlife/nongame/text/html/cnty_eos/jefferson.html)

(http://georgiawildlife.com/sites/default/files/uploads/wildlife/nongame/text/html/cnty_eos/hart.html) bLegal Status: Federal: Species with the Statuses of FE (Federal Endangered), FT (Federal Threatened), FC (Federal Candidate), BGEPA (Bald Eagle Protection Act) are legally protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973. Georgia: Species with the Statuses of SE (State Endangered), ST (State Threatened), SR (Rare Species), SC (Special Concern), SU (State Unusual) Are Legally Protected under the Georgia Endangered Wildlife (1973) and the Georgia Wildflower Preservation Act (1973).

Page 170: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

GDNR, Environmental Protection

Division

(GEPD)

Page 171: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Mr. Jac Capp Program Manager Stationary Source Permitting Program Air Protection Branch Environmental Protection Division 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354-3906 404-363-7000 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Capp:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 172: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Jac Capp December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 173: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Jac Capp December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 174: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 175: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 176: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 177: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 178: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 179: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 Mr. Jac Capp Program Manager Stationary Source Permitting Program Air Protection Branch Environmental Protection Division 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354-3906 404-363-7000 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Capp:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 180: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Jac Capp December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the Georgia EPD Air Protection Branch review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 181: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Jac Capp December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 182: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 183: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 184: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 185: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 186: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 187: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 188: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Elba Island TerminalElba Island Terminal

Liquefaction ProjectPre-Application MeetingPre Application Meeting

Georgia EPD, SLNG, ShellMarch 7, 2013,

1

Meeting Purposeg p

� Project IntroductionConfidentiality Concern� Confidentiality Concern

� Air Permitting Concern� Permitting Schedule� Other Unknowns

2

Elba Island Terminal Location

Elba Terminal

3

Elba Island Historyy

Elba Expansion IRecommissioning/Reactivation� Recommissioning/Reactivation

� Open Season – June 1999� Customer – Sonat Energy Services� Project Cost $130 million� Replaced five LNG Vaporizers (88.1 mmBtu/hr)� PSD Permit Issued January 24, 2001S e t ssued Ja ua y , 00� Project In-service December 1, 2001

4

Elba Island Historyy

Elba Expansion IIIncrease in Import/Send out Capacity 0 54 bcf/d� Increase in Import/Send-out Capacity 0.54 bcf/d

� Total Terminal Capacity 1.22 bcf/d� Added Three New LNG Vaporizers (Sub X 120 SCV, 121

/h )mmBtu/hr)� Installed Fourth LNG Storage Tank (1 million bbl)� PSD Permit Issued February 27, 2003� First-Fired November 7, 2005

5

Elba Island Historyy

Elba Expansion IIIIncrease in Import/Send out Capacity 0 54 bcf/d� Increase in Import/Send-out Capacity 0.54 bcf/d

� Total Terminal Capacity 1.76 bcf/d� Added Three New LNG Vaporizers (Sub X 120 SCV, 121

/h ) h d f SmmBtu/hr), authorized for Six Units� Installed Fifth LNG Storage Tank (1.25 million bbl)� PSD Permit Issued May 15, 2007� First-Fired November 13, 2009

6

Page 189: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Elba Island Terminal Aerial View

7

Interstate Pipeline Networkp

Transco

Hartwell C/S

Elba Express

Hartwell C/S

SNGJeff. Co. C/S

Cypress

Elba Terminal

8

yp

Liquefaction Project Schematicq j

Elba ExpressElba Express SLNG

Elba Liquefaction Company (ELC)

Elba Liquefaction Company LLC:Formed January 30 2013

Elba Liquefaction Company (ELC)(Limited Liability Company)

� Formed January 30, 2013� Managed by Member Board made up of Kinder Morgan and Shell

representativesOwnership:Ownership:� Southern Liquefaction Company, LLC (subsidiary of EPB) – 51%� Shell US Gas & Power LLC (subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell) – 49%

9

Liquefaction Project Scopeq j p

Multiple Shell proprietary, small scale liquefaction units� Total – ~380 MMcfd (~2.5 mtpa) – 10 unitsCosts (Includes MMLS and Balance of Plant - BoP):� 10 MMLS + BoP (~2.5 mtpa): ~$1.5 blnSchedule� Production of first LNG from liquefaction: 2016DOE Export Authority:� FTA up to 500 Mmcfd (~4 mtpa) already received� Non-FTA application pending for up to 500 Mmcfd (~4 mtpa)

10

Liquefaction Project Scopeq j p

Existing facility modifications: ~$250+ millionElba Express Pipeline� Elba Express Pipeline� Compression (2 phases); � Amended existing service agreement and EEC Tariff to

d f flprovide for reverse flow� Southern LNG

� Pumps, transfer piping, power supply, controls� Restructured existing firm terminal service and amended

negotiated rate to provide for ship loading service.

11

Proposed Liquefaction Facility Layoutp q y y

Proposed Project Boundary

12

Proposed�Project�BoundaryProposed�Location�of�Liquefaction�UnitsFlare�and�Sub�Station�LocationLoading�Arm�Modifications

Page 190: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Liquefaction Facilities Overview–MMLS/misc. (Preliminary)/ ( y)

VENT�TO�ATMOSPHERE

VENT�TO�

COMMON�FLARE�PILOT

FUGITIVE�EMISSIONS

OATMOSPHERE

COMMON�HEAT�MEDIUM�

VENT�TO�ATMOSPHERE

HEATERS

COMMON�AND�MMLS�FACILITIES

KEY:

13

Liquefaction Facilities Overview q

iC5 Storage

C3 St

ReverseOsmosis or Demin Skid

HotOil

FlareStack

and KO Drums

Fuelgas

Fuelgas

Mi d C3 Storage

Acid Gas ThermalOxidizer

Fuelgas

Decon

Knockw

ater

WasteWater

Amine

Common Pipe-Rack (both sides)

C2= Storage

MixedRefrigerant

Storage Water for

Decon

MLS

2

MLS

1

MLS

3

MLS

4

MLS

5

MLS

6

Piping

out

StabilizedCondensate

SBL

(both sides)

Power

NewControlRoom

MM

LNG

Storm w

ater

MM

MM

MM

MM

MMIS

Nitrogen

Feed gas

To fuel

Import

Vent Gas

ExcessBOG to

MMLS or spare

pipeline

r runoff

Firewater

From MMLS Vendor

Existing

LNGTanks

From EPC

AddedInstrumentAir System

Nitrogen

NitrogenStorage

To fuel

Boil Off Gas Compressor

Off Site Pipeline Compressors

14

From EPC Air SystemLNG

PumpsNormally no flow

SurgeVessel

Air emissions

New Air Emission Sources

� Direct Fired Heater(s)Amine Regen Flash Drum� Amine Regen Flash Drum

� Amine Reflux Overhead Drum Vent� Acid Gas Thermal Oxidizer(s)� Backup Flare(s)� Amine Storage Tank� VOL Storage TankO Sto age a� Emergency Generator� Fugitive Emissions

15

Air Permitting Impactg p

� Elba Express PipelineHartwell Compressor Station (add Compression)� Hartwell Compressor Station (add Compression)

� New Compressor Station (Jefferson County)� Minor for Titles I, III, and V (?) � NSR, NSPS, Title V, SIP

� Elba LNG Terminal� Existing Major Title I & Title V, Area Source Title IIIst g ajo t e & t e , ea Sou ce t e� Proposed Expansion – Major for Title I� Significant for CO2e and VOC

Insignificant for other NSR Pollutants� Insignificant for other NSR Pollutants� Remain Area Source for Title III� NSR, NSPS, Title V, SIP

16

BACT Analysesy

� CO2e SourcesAmine Units� Amine Units

� Fuel Combustion� Fugitive Sources

� VOC Sources� VOL Storage Tanks� Fugitive Sourcesug t e Sou ces� Combustion Products

17

Air Quality Impact AnalysesQ y p y

� Not Significant for NOX, SO2, PM, and COCO e no air quality standard� CO2e – no air quality standard

� VOC – no air quality standard� Air Toxics Impact

� Preferred Model� Cumulative impact� AAC Data PublishedC ata ub s ed

18

Page 191: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Project Timelinej

� FERC FilingPre filing Initiation 12/5/2012� Pre-filing Initiation – 12/5/2012

� Initial Consultation – 2/12/2013� Pre-filing Approval – 3/1/2013� Application Submittal – December 2013

� Georgia EPD� Pre-application Meeting – 3/7/2013e app cat o eet g 3/ / 0 3� Application for Permit – Sep:Dec 2013� Construction Begins – Nov 2014

In service Date 2016� In-service Date - 2016

19

Page 192: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

GDNR, Coastal Resources Division

Page 193: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Kelie Moore Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Resources Division One Conservation Way Brunswick, GA 31520 912-264-7218 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Ms. Moore:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 194: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Kelie Moore December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 195: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Kelie Moore December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 196: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 197: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 198: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 199: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 200: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 201: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 Kelie Moore Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Resources Division One Conservation Way Brunswick, GA 31520 912-264-7218 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Ms. Moore:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 202: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Kelie Moore December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and

Page 203: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Kelie Moore December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 204: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 205: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 206: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 207: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 208: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

GDNR, Historic Preservation Division

Page 209: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 Dr. David Crass Historic Preservation Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources 34 Peachtree St. NW, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30303 404-656-2840 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Dr. Crass:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 210: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Dr. David Crass December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC

Page 211: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Dr. David Crass December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 212: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 213: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 214: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 215: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 216: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 10, 2012)

Page 217: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 10, 2012 Mr. W. Ray Luce Historic Preservation Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources 34 Peachtree St. NW, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30303 404-656-2840 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Luce:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

Page 218: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Mr. W. Ray Luce December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that you review the information we have provided and determine your agency’s ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for

Page 219: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Mr. W. Ray Luce December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 220: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 221: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 222: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 223: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 224: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

MEMORANDUM

TO: David Thomas

Sr. Technical Consultant

CH2M Hill

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1600

Atlanta, Georgia 30328

FROM: Elizabeth Shirk

Environmental Review Coordinator

Historic Preservation Division

RE: Receipt of Early Coordination Information

Project Title: Elba Liquefaction Project & EEC Expansion Project

Project Number: HP-121211-002

County: Chatham

DATE: January 4, 2013

The Historic Preservation Division has received the early coordination information

required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Georgia

Environmental Policy Act (GEPA). Thank you for submitting this information, and we look

forward to working with you in the future as this project progresses.

ECS:jad

cc: Lupita McClenning, Coastal Georgia Regional Commission

Page 225: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

South Carolina Department of Health

and Environmental Conservation

(SCDHEC),

Ocean and Coastal Resource

Management

Page 226: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 7, 2012 John Cox Coastal Zone Consistency Coordinator 1362 McMillan Ave. Suite 400 Charleston, SC 29405 843-953-0860 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Cox:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 227: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

John Cox December 7, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012

b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013

c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013

d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014

e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014

f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 228: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

John Cox December 7, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 229: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project Overview Maps

Page 230: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 231: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 232: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 233: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

(December 7, 2012 correspondence clarified and reissued on December 12, 2012)

Page 234: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

CH2M HILL

Northpark 400

1000 Abernathy Road

Suite 1600

Atlanta, GA 30328

Tel 770.604.9095

Fax 770.604.9183

December 12, 2012 John Cox Coastal Zone Consistency Coordinator 1362 McMillan Ave. Suite 400 Charleston, SC 29405 843-953-0860 Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project by Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. and

EEC Expansion Project by Elba Express Company, L.L.C.

Dear Mr. Cox:

Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (“SLNG”), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (“KMI”) is proposing to add natural gas liquefaction and exporting capabilities (“Elba Liquefaction Project”) to SLNG’s existing Elba Island liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminal in Chatham County, Georgia (“Terminal”). The Elba Liquefaction Project will export domestically-sourced LNG. SLNG will submit an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) for authorization under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) to construct, modify, or abandon structures, piping, and appurtenances at or next to the Terminal, including abandonment of the LNG truck loading facilities at the Terminal.

The Terminal, located on an 840-acre private island near Savannah, Georgia, currently imports LNG using two LNGC berths, LNG storage tanks, and associated regasification and send out infrastructure. The Terminal’s current storage capacity is 11.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf), with 1,755 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of peak vaporization and send-out capacity. The Terminal is directly connected to four major pipelines, and indirectly connected to two others.

As currently designed, the Elba Liquefaction Project will include natural gas pre-treatment, liquefaction, and export facilities with a capacity of up to 0.5 Bcf per day, plus permanent enhancements to the existing equipment and additional utilities within the existing footprint. The Elba Liquefaction Project facilities would permit gas to be received by pipeline at the Terminal, liquefied and loaded from the Terminal’s storage tanks onto vessels berthed at the existing marine facility. The Elba Liquefaction Project will be designed to allow the Terminal to be capable of providing bi-directional service.

The proposed project boundary of the Elba Liquefaction Project is shown on the attached map.

Page 235: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

John Cox December 12, 2012

PAGE 2

SLNG will modify certain operational procedures to accommodate the proposed export operations. These procedures, which previously have been found to be consistent with the Safety and Hazard analysis that was conducted for the original authorizations for the Terminal import operations, will be modified to include loading of LNG into ships.

In conjunction with the Elba Liquefaction Project, Elba Express Company, L.L.C. (“EEC”) is proposing a two-phased project to add compression along its existing EEC Pipeline. This proposed addition will include (1) constructing a new compressor station in Glascock, Jefferson, or Burke County, Georgia, to include up to two compressor units totaling as much as approximately 16,000 horsepower, and (2) an expansion of its existing Hartwell Compressor Station in Hart County, Georgia, by adding a single unit of up to 16,000 horsepower (“EEC Expansion Project”). EEC will submit an application to the Commission requesting authorization under Section 7 of the NGA to construct, and operate these facilities.

The proposed Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project components will be regulated by the FERC, with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). SLNG and EEC filed for approval from the FERC on December 5, 2012, to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application for under Sections 3 and 7(b) of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations.

The preliminary project schedule includes the following target dates:

a. Pre-filing process begins – December 2012 b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications – November 2013 c. Submit application to FERC – November 2013 d. NEPA review period – March 2014 to August 2014 e. Receive FERC Authorization – November 2014 f. Start Construction – January 2015

Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commission’s Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the Elba Island LNG Terminal Expansion Project (Elba III Project) in August of 2007. SLNG notified the U.S. Coast Guard of the proposed modifications to the Marine Transfer Area as part of the Elba Liquefaction Project, and received concurrence from the U. S. Coast Guard by letter dated September 11, 2012, that SLNG is not required to submit a new Letter of Intent or Waterway Suitability Report to supplement those dated September 20, 2006, and June 18, 2007, respectively.

On behalf of SLNG and EEC, we respectfully request that the SCDHEC, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commission’s pre-filing process for the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion Project. We will be in contact with you during the Elba Liquefaction Project and EEC Expansion review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at [email protected] if you need further information.

Page 236: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

John Cox December 12, 2012

PAGE 3

Sincerely,

David Thomas Sr. Technical Consultant CH2M HILL

Enclosures

Page 237: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Phase I and II- Elba Liquefaction Project

Overview Maps

Page 238: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

Proposed Project Boundary Proposed Location of Liquefaction Units Flare and Sub-Station Location Loading Arm Modifications

Elba Liquefaction Project Figure 1-1

Page 239: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

EEC Expansion Project Overview Maps

Page 240: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the
Page 241: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

SCDHEC.12.10.12.PHONE.LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D Southern LNG Elba Export Project

Call To: D. Thomas

Phone No.: 843.953.0860 [email protected] Date: 12/10/12

Call From: John Cox Coastal Zone Consistency Coordinator Time: 3:40 PM

Message Taken By:

Subject: Elba Liquefaction Project

Project No.: 456777

Mr. Cox called me in response to the correspondence we sent regarding the proposed Project at the Elba LNG Terminal. He said that if the impacts were only in upland areas at the Terminal and no dredging activities were proposed that SCDHEC would probably not comment. He said that we might want to coordinate with the SCDHEC Bureau of Water in Columbia, but he didn’t have a specific contact.

Page 242: APPENDIX 1.A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE Public, …...Updates to the Proj ect Companies provide the following updates to the Project: 1. The anticipated key milestone dates for the

From:                              Cox, John [[email protected]] Sent:                               Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:02 AM To:                                   Thomas, David/ATL Subject:                          Re: Elba Liquefaction Project Received...thanks.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: John: As a follow up to our conversation on 12/10/12 I have revised the correspondence sent to you dated 12/7/12 to correctly reference your agency’s ability to participate in the FERC pre-filing process and have attached a copy of the revised letter for your records. I apologize for my error. David Thomas, CEP CH2M HILL Northpark 400 1000 Abernathy Road Atlanta, GA 30328 Ph: 678.530.4350 cell: 678.314.2871 -- John Cox PG, CGWP, LEED AP CZC Coordinator SCDHEC - OCRM 843-953-0860 [email protected] 1362 McMillan Avenue Suite 400 Charleston, SC 29405

Page 1 of 1

3/27/2013file://C:\Users\jripley\Desktop\Correspondence for Dave\SCDHEC\Re Elba Liquefaction ...