APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

download APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

of 11

Transcript of APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    1/11

    VERMONT ALL-PAYER MODELTERM SHEET PROPOSALCompanion Paper

    Vermont Agency of Administration

    Green Mountain Care Board

    January 25, 2016

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    2/11

    2

    Table of ontents

    OVERVIEW 3

    WHY DO HEALTH CARE PAYMENTS NEED TO CHANGE? 4

    WHAT IS AN ALL-PAYER MODEL AND WHY ARE WE PROPOSING IT? 5

    WHAT IS VERMONT PROPOSING IN THE DRAFT TERM SHEET? 6

    MEDICARE BENEFICIARY PROTECTIONS 6STATEWIDE FINANCIAL TARGETS 7REGULATED SERVICES 7STATEWIDE QUALITY TARGETS 7PAYMENT &DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORMS 8VERMONT BLUEPRINT FOR HEALTH AND SERVICES AND SUPPORTS AT HOME (SASH) 8EXPANSION OF MEDICARE SERVICES 8

    ADDITIONAL

    EXPANSION OF

    MEDICARE

    SERVICES

    9PATHWAY FOR INTEGRATION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES AND LONG TERM SERVICESAND SUPPORTS 9

    HOW WILL THE TERM SHEET BE EVALUATED? 10

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    3/11

    3

    Overview

    Vermonts Legislature directed the Green Mountain Care Board (GMCB) and the Agency

    of Administration (AOA) to jointly explore an all-payer model.1An all-payer model is an

    agreement between the State and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

    that allows Vermont to explore new ways of financing and delivering health care. The

    all-payer model enables the three main payers of health care in VermontMedicaid,Medicare, and commercial insurance, to pay for health care differently than through

    fee-for-service reimbursement.

    In an all-payer model, Vermonters will have the same choice of providers as they have

    today under Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance. Benefits will not be

    reduced. By contrast, Medicare beneficiaries may have access to, and coverage for, new

    services not covered by Medicare today.

    The GMCB and AOA have jointly explored an all-payer model through dialogue and

    negotiation with CMS. The result of this dialogue, and consultation with stakeholders

    and consultants, is a term sheetproposed by the State of Vermont to CMS that broadly

    reflects a policy framework to enable the waivers of federal law necessary to operate an

    all-payer model.

    1Act 54 of 2015.

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    4/11

    4

    It is unusual to divulge the negotiating position of a party in the middle of a negotiation;

    however, the GMCB and AOA are circulating the term sheetand this companion paper

    to ensure maximum transparency and seek input. Neither this white paper nor the

    proposed term sheet represent a binding commitment on the part of Vermont or the

    Federal government. Furthermore, the term sheet may evolve as it works its way

    through both the state and federal clearance processes. All materials should beconsidered preliminary until a final agreement is potentially reached later this year. If

    Vermont decides the final agreement is not better than todays system, it can end the

    negotiation. Similarly, if CMS is not satisfied that the overall proposal meets its policy

    and financial goals, it can decline to enter into the agreement.

    The paper seeks to answer four key questions important to Vermonters:

    Why do health care payments need to change?

    What is an all-payer model and why are we proposing it?

    What is Vermont proposing in the draftterm sheet

    ?

    How will the term sheet be evaluated?

    Why do health care payments need to change?

    Vermont families are struggling to afford health care today. This problem will grow

    worse over time if health care costs continue to grow faster than income and the

    economy.

    Health care is expensive. When the fee-for-service health care payment model was

    devised over 50 years ago, the average life expectancy of Americans was significantly

    shorter than it is today, and the burden of chronic disease was smaller. The Centers for

    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that treating people with chronic diseases

    accounts for 86 percent of our nations health care costs. Health care reimbursement

    was designed to pay for acute medical conditions that required a single visit to the

    doctor or a single hospitalization. By contrast, persons with chronic conditions require

    regular, ongoing care across the continuum of traditional medical services and

    community-based services and supports. Fee-for-service reimbursement makes it

    difficult for innovative health care providers to adapt to the changing needs of the

    population that they serve. The antiquated system provides clear financial incentives to

    order additional tests and procedures, yet it does not reward doctors and other healthcare professionals for providing individualized and coordinated care for complex chronic

    conditions. In the end, patients may receive care that is expensive, fragmented, and

    disorganized.

    A new, all-inclusive population-based model of reimbursement rewards health care

    professionals that are adapting to the changing needs of the population. In this model

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    5/11

    5

    doctors and other health care professionals are freed from restrictive reimbursement

    policies and the silos of care that these policies create. Doctors and other health care

    providers are empowered to deliver the care that they know to be most effective in

    promoting and managing the health of the population that they serve. Positioning

    health care providers to lead health care delivery change creates a more holistic

    approach to patient care and is at the heart of the all-payer model proposal.

    The federal government recognizes that the fee-for-service payment system is a

    mismatch for evolving health care needs and goals for population health improvement.

    CMS has created multiple opportunities to pay for value rather than volume in health

    care, encouraging providers to invest in the collaborative and well-coordinated care that

    they know to be best for their patients. For example, Vermont has received $45 million

    in State Innovation Model (SIM) funds to encourage transformation in how we pay for

    health care services to make health care more affordable and accessible, while

    maintaining high quality standards. Additionally, the federal government has created

    programs that encourage the use of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). ACOs are

    health care provider led organizations accountable for cost and quality of care and agree

    to be paid in a way different than standard fee-for-service.

    CMS has doubled down on this approach, committing to paying for 80% of its services in

    alternatives to fee-for-service by 2018. Furthermore, CMS has created the Next

    Generation ACO program, which creates the opportunity for Vermont and others to

    explore how a truly integrated health care system would work.

    What is an all-payer model and why are we proposing it?

    The CMS Next Generation program allows ACOs to be paid in a different way by

    Medicare. ACOs could receive an all-inclusive population-based payment for each

    Medicare beneficiary attributed to the ACO. CMS would allow ACOs some flexibility in

    certain payment rules in exchange for accepting this new type of payment. Medicare

    will continue to pay providers directly and all of its patient protections stay in place. The

    CMS Next Generation program creates a new opportunity for Vermont to align

    Medicare, commercial, such as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont, and Medicaid

    payments.

    In Vermonts proposal, the all-payer model is about getting commercial insurers andMedicaid to pay the same way Medicare will be paying for health care under its Next

    Generation program. The proposal is for all payers to approach health care payment to

    ACOs in a common way and for all payers to give doctors and other health care

    professionals the flexibility they need to lead health care delivery change. Different

    rules, standards, and methods of payment across major payers creates inefficiencies

    and unnecessary administrative costs, while under an all-payer model providers and

    patients can be served by a more coordinated system that is structured to align quality

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    6/11

    6

    goals and reduce costs. The State would agree to coordinate with Medicaid and

    commercial insurers, and in return the federal government would allow Medicare to

    participate in the ACO value-based payment model. As is true today, health care

    providers participation in ACOs is voluntary; the ACO must be attractive to providers

    and offer an alternative health care delivery model that is appealing enough to join.

    This model builds off federal and state health care reform efforts that have value-based

    payment components today. The Blueprint for Health, for example, provides an

    essential foundation for enhancing and supporting primary care in an all-inclusive

    population-based payment model. In 2014, Vermont created an all-payer Shared

    Savings Program (SSP) for ACOs. Starting with the Medicare SSP, Vermont modeled and

    aligned a Medicaid SSP program and a commercial SSP program offered by Blue Cross

    Blue Shield of Vermont. Again, the state will leverage this experience to move from fee-

    for-service with shared savings to an all-inclusive population payment with quality

    incentives across Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurers using the Next

    Generation model parameters, adapted for Medicaid and commercial insurers where

    needed. This model is intended to shift financial accountability for efficiency and quality

    of care to provider organizations.

    What is Vermont proposing in the draft term sheet?

    The AOA and the GMCB have released a draft term sheet, which is a description of

    Vermonts proposal to the federal government. The term sheet contains the elements of

    a non-binding proposal for an all-payer model that Vermont and CMS identified through

    iterative discussions. The term sheet is a framework for a potential agreement, but is

    not an agreement.

    The term sheet sets out the basic outline for a potential all-payer model agreement,

    including the legal authority of the state to enter into such an agreement, the

    performance period for the agreement, waivers necessary to facilitate payment change

    and additional covered services, a plan for data sharing, and an evaluation of the

    demonstration. Central elements of the proposal are highlighted below:

    Medicare Beneficiary Protections

    Medicare beneficiaries access to care and services and providers will not be limited

    under the all-payer model. Specifically, Medicare beneficiaries in Vermont will: Retain full freedom of choice of providers and suppliers, as well as all rights and

    beneficiary protections of Medicare.

    Retain coverage of the same care and services provided under Medicare today.

    Medicare beneficiaries will not experience any reductions in benefits or covered

    services under the all-payer model.

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    7/11

    7

    Vermont may seek benefit enhancements that will directly improve beneficiary

    access to care and services.

    Statewide Financial Targets

    At the heart of the proposal to CMS is a statewide financial target for certain health care

    services across Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurers. The goal of this financialtarget is to bring health care spending closer to economic growth. When health care

    costs grow faster than Vermonts economy, Vermont families find their premiums rising

    faster than wages. This is also true in the states Medicaid budget, which grows faster

    than the revenue sources used to fund it.

    Over the course of the five-year agreement, the term sheet proposes a statewide

    spending target of 3.5% with a maximum spending growth of 4.3%, which is about 1%

    above the 15-year average for Vermonts gross state product.

    The term sheet proposes that Medicare will grow more slowly than the national averagein Vermont. The term sheet proposes to reduce growth in Medicare costs by .2% off of

    the national trend for services covered by the agreement at the end of the 5 years.

    Regulated Services

    These financial targets are calculated using the health care services currently included in

    the shared savings programs, although Vermont has the option under the agreement to

    expand these services for Medicaid. The proposal includes a commitment to develop a

    path to ensure that services not subject to the financial targets, such as mental health,

    substance abuse, and long term services and supports, are part of an integrated

    provider network and eligible to receive funding as part of an ACO network. The

    proposal does not restrict spending on mental health, substance abuse, and long term

    services and supports. Critical to the success of the model is the integration of and

    emphasis on community-based services and supports not traditionally unified with

    medical services. Additional investments to allow the care continuum to better provide

    substance abuse and mental health services may save costs by keeping Vermonters

    healthier and out of the hospital.

    Statewide Quality Targets

    The State is proposing three ambitious, population health goals, which are derived from

    the States Health Improvement Plan created by the Vermont Department of Health.

    Vermont will establish population health measures for the State that will be monitoredand evaluated over the course of a potential demonstration agreement. Population

    health goals include:

    Increasing access to primary care.

    Reducing the prevalence of and improving the management of chronic diseases.

    Addressing the substance abuse epidemic.

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    8/11

    8

    Vermont will identify existing claims and clinical measures that will help it achieve its

    broader goals. In addition to these high level goals, the proposal indicates that the

    GMCB would establish statewide quality measures for the ACO based on the measures

    currently required in the shared savings programs. ACOs will be held accountable for a

    wide range of quality measures through a coordinated and consolidated measurement

    strategy. Just as today, the ACOs performance on the identified measures will impactitsall-inclusive population payment.

    Payment & Delivery System Reforms

    Vermont Blueprint for Health and Services and Supports at Home (SASH)

    The Blueprint for Health currently includes Medicare payments to its medical homes

    and community health teams (CHTs) through a demonstration agreement with

    Medicare that expires at the end of this year, 2016. The State proposes to continue and

    enhance Medicare participation through the all-payer model agreement. Absent this

    agreement, Medicare will no longer participate in the Blueprint for Health and the

    payments will be discontinued by the federal government.

    Vermont proposes to expand Medicares participation in the successful and proven

    Supports and Services at Home (SASH) program. SASH is a partnership between

    affordable housing providers, Area Agencies on Aging, Home Health agencies, Mental

    Health and Developmental Services agencies, Blueprint Medical Homes (and CHTs) and

    local hospitals. The SASH model provides both individualized and population-based

    service and supports to Vermonts most vulnerable adults, primarily those on Medicareliving in congregate non-profit owned and/or managed affordable housing.

    Expansion of Medicare Services

    Vermont proposes to expand Medicare services to Vermont seniors through the all-

    payer model by allowing an ACO to provide care differently than is currently allowed

    under Medicare. By allowing additional flexibility in certain areas, health care providers

    will be able to better care for seniors in the following specific circumstances:

    Three Day Skilled Nursing Facility Rule: This waiver removes the requirement

    that Medicare beneficiaries have a three-day stay in the hospital before beingadmitted to a skilled nursing facility to ensure Medicare payment for the skilled

    nursing facility.

    Telehealth Rule Waiver: Telehealth is currently limited to rural health

    professional shortage areas. This waiver removes restrictions and allows

    beneficiaries to receive telehealth services in their homes, whether they are in a

    rural area or not.

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    9/11

    9

    Post-Discharge Home Visits: Today Medicare beneficiaries can receive a post-

    discharge home visit when they return home from a hospital stay. This waiver

    eliminates the direct supervision by a physician requirement and allows the ACO

    to contract with other licensed clinicians to provide a home visit.

    Additional Expansion of Medicare Services

    Medicare currently does not participate in Vermonts Hub and Spoke opiate addiction

    treatment program. Vermont proposes that Medicare begin participating in this

    program in order to ensure that the model addresses the substance abuse needs of

    Vermonts seniors.

    The term sheet proposal also describes Vermonts interest in obtaining additional

    waivers to facilitate care delivery transformation in the State and enhance the services

    that Medicare beneficiaries can receive. Throughout the term of the agreement,

    Vermont will specifically consider whether and how to expand the scope of practice forNurse Practitioners in Medicare, how to improve the coverage of long term services and

    supports to enable more continuity of care, and earlier access to the hospice benefit.

    Pathway for Integration of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services and Long Term

    Services and Supports

    Vermont proposes to continue to work with mental health, substance abuse, and long

    term services and support providers to determine the best path forward to create an

    integrated health care system. Specifically, the State intends to facilitate a process that

    sets forth specific steps, analyses, and milestones that will result in an understanding ofhow payment and delivery system reform could progress for these providers whether

    they are paid by Medicaid or an ACO. Currently, through the Vermont Health Care

    Innovation Project (VHCIP), funded with the SIM grant, the Agency of Human Services

    and VHCIP staff are working with several of these providers on payment reforms.

    Examples include:

    Expanding the integrated family services program, which currently provides

    more flexible funding for children with special health needs;

    Simplifying the structure and administration of the services offered by the

    designated agencies to provide more flexible funding and streamlined care toimprove the availability of mental health and developmental disability services.

    Implementing prospective payments for home health agencies, which is on track

    to begin in July 2016.

    The state is committed to working with providers of these services to ensure integration

    of care across different types of health care providers. If it makes sense, at some point

    in the future, these services could be included in the financial targets. At this point in

  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    10/11

    10

    time, however, there is concern that these service providers may be underfunded and

    limiting future funding would not improve services. Exclusion from the funding target

    would not limit the ability of these service providers partnering with an ACO to be

    included in the population based payment to the ACO or to otherwise work together to

    integrate care for Vermonters while maintaining independent payment models.

    How will the term sheet be evaluated?

    As stated earlier, the term sheet is a non-binding proposal from the State of Vermont to

    the federal government for an all-payer model facilitated by necessary waivers to allow

    Medicares participation. The term sheetsets out the basic outline for a potential all-

    payer model agreement, but is not an agreement. Major elements of the term sheet

    include Medicare beneficiary protections, statewide financial targets, statewide quality

    improvement goals, regulated services, and potential expansions of Medicare covered

    services. The term sheet also lays out the legal authority of the State to enter into a

    potential waiver agreement, the performance period for the agreement, waivers

    necessary to facilitate payment change, a plan for data sharing, and an evaluation of the

    demonstration.

    To determine if the policy framework represented in the term sheet proposal benefits

    the State of Vermont, the term sheet must be evaluated from multiple points of view

    including but not limited to:

    Patients;

    Medicare beneficiaries;

    Medicaid beneficiaries; Commercial insurance enrollees;

    Uninsured Vermonters;

    Health care providers;

    Providers of community-based services and supports;

    Health care payers: Commercial and Medicaid;

    Legislators; and

    Businesses.

    To gather these points of view, the following will occur:

    The term sheet will be made available to the public through distribution to themedia and posting on the Agency of Administration and Green Mountain Care

    Boards websites:

    o www.gmcboard.vermont.gov

    o http://hcr.vermont.gov/home

    The term sheet will be distributed to Legislators.

    http://www.gmcboard.vermont.gov/http://www.gmcboard.vermont.gov/http://hcr.vermont.gov/homehttp://hcr.vermont.gov/homehttp://hcr.vermont.gov/homehttp://www.gmcboard.vermont.gov/
  • 7/25/2019 APM Companion Paper Formatted FINAL

    11/11

    11

    The Green Mountain Care Board will hold open, public meetings to discuss and

    evaluate the term sheet.

    A formal public comment period on the term sheet will be initiated by the Green

    Mountain Care Board.

    The Agency of Administration will accept public comments at

    http://hcr.vermont.gov/home.

    Taking all points of view into consideration, the Green Mountain Care Board and the

    Agency of Administration must independently assess the all-payer model proposal. The

    evaluation will reflect the multi-faceted proposal for a new health care delivery model.

    For example, the Green Mountain Care Board must assess the financial terms laid out in

    the proposal as well as the parameters it has to work within to implement and govern

    the model responsibly. In its entirety, the evaluation of the proposal will assess the

    potential of the all-payer model to build a system that offers the right incentives and

    rewards providers for delivering on the promise of integrated, coordinated, high quality

    care.

    At the conclusion of this evaluation, the Green Mountain Care Board and the Agency of

    Administration will determine whether and how the all-payer model proposal should be

    adjusted to reflect stakeholder input. If the evaluation does not find the proposal to

    have potential to meet such goals as reducing the rate of growth in health care

    spending, improving access to high quality health care, maintaining the ability to recruit

    and retain health care professionals, building a more integrated health care system

    inclusive of the care continuum, and to be of economic benefit to the state, the Board

    and Agency of Administration will end the negotiation with CMS.

    http://hcr.vermont.gov/homehttp://hcr.vermont.gov/home