APEL Lab Manual

download APEL Lab Manual

of 54

description

Experiments on pavements

Transcript of APEL Lab Manual

  • Prepared by:

    Dr. Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri Senior Research Scientist

    Patil K. S., Suraj M. S., Sumit Jain

    Postgraduate Research Interns

    VTI ADVANCED PAVEMENT ENGINEERING

    LABORATORY MANUAL

    Center for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning

    Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, INDIA

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    2

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page

    1. SIEVE ANALYSIS..............................................................................................................6

    2. DENSITY DETERMINATION BY PYCNOMETER ..........................................................9

    3. SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION TEST ............................................ 11

    4. FLAKINESS INDEX TEST ............................................................................................... 14

    5. ELONGATION INDEX TEST .......................................................................................... 16

    6. LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST .................................................................................. 18

    7. SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMEN ............................................................................... 21

    8. PENETRATION TEST ...................................................................................................... 23

    9. DUCTILITY TEST ............................................................................................................ 25

    10. SOFTENING POINT TEST ........................................................................................... 28

    11. FLASH & FIRE POINT TEST ....................................................................................... 30

    12. DETERMINATION OF BINDER CONTENT FOR ASPHALT MIX ............................ 32

    13. BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL METHOD ......................................... 35

    14. SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC) ....................................................... 44

    15. DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER .......................................................................... 47

    16. BENKELMAN BEAM DEFLECTION MEASUREMENTS .......................................... 50

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    3

    LIST OF TABLES

    Page

    Table 1.1: Grain Size Distribution ...............................................................................................8

    Table 3.1: Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Calculations ................................................ 13

    Table 4.1: Dimensions of Thickness and Length Gauges ........................................................... 15

    Table 5.1: Dimensions of Thickness and Length Gauges ........................................................... 17

    Table 6.1: Grading of test samples ............................................................................................ 20

    Table 6.2: Selection of Abrasive Charge.................................................................................... 20

    Table 7.1: Specific Gravity Calculation ..................................................................................... 22

    Table 8.1: Penetration values of the sample ............................................................................... 24

    Table 9.1: Ductility values of the sample ................................................................................... 26

    Table 12.1: Binder content calculation ...................................................................................... 34

    Table 13.1: Correction Factors .................................................................................................. 41

    Table 13.2: Aggregate Specifications ........................................................................................ 42

    Table 13.3: Specifications for Marshall Properties..................................................................... 42

    Table 14.1: AASHTO R 35 Superpave Gyratory Compaction Effort ........................................ 46

    Table 15.1: DCP Testing ........................................................................................................... 49

    Table 16.1: Calculation of Rebound Deflection ......................................................................... 53

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    4

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Page

    Figure 1.1: Balance ..................................................................................................................5

    Figure 1.2: IS Sieves ..................................................................................................................6

    Figure 1.4: Grain Size Distribution Semi Log Plot ....................................................................7

    Figure 2.1: Pycnometer ............................................................................................................8

    Figure 2.2: Balance ............................................................................................................9

    Figure 4.1: Thickness Gauge ..................................................................................................... 14

    Figure 5.1: Length Gauge .......................................................................................................... 16

    Figure 6.2: Oven .................................................................................................................... 17

    Figure 6.3: Los Angeles Machine .............................................................................................. 18

    Figure 7.1: Specific Gravity Bottle ............................................................................................ 21

    Figure 8.1: Standard Penetrometer ......................................................................................... 22

    Figure 8.2:PenetrometerNeedle ......................................................................................... 23

    Figure 9.1: Ductility Testing Machine .................................................................................... 24

    Figure 9.2: Standard Briquette Mould .................................................................................... 25

    Figure 10.1: Ring and Ball Apparatus .................................................................................... 27

    Figure 10.2: Thermometer .................................................................................... 28

    Figure 11.1:Cleveland apparatus ............................................................................................... 30

    Figure 12.1: Binder Centrifuge Extractor ............................................................................... 31

    Figure 12.2: Precision Balance ............................................................................... 32

    Figure 13.2: Sample Extractor ............................................................................................... 35

    Figure 13.3: Loading Machine ............................................................................................... 36

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    5

    Figure 13.4: Oven .................................................................................................................. 35

    Figure 13.5: Compaction Pedestal and Hammer ........................................................................ 36

    Figure 15.1: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ................................................................................. 47

    Figure 16.1: Benkelman Beam .................................................................................................. 50

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    6

    1. SIEVE ANALYSIS (IS: 2720 (Part 4) 1985, ASTM D75 92, 1992)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the gradation or distribution of aggregate particle sizes within a given sample

    APPARATUS

    Balance: sensitive to 0.1 percent of the weight of sample to be weighed.

    Sieves: 20 cm diameter and 5 cm height; provided with screens, top lid and bottom pan.

    Rubber Pestle and Mortar

    Mechanical Rotary Sieve Shaker

    Figure 1.1: Balance Figure 1.2: IS Sieves

    Figure 1.3: Mechanical Sieve Shaker

    Source: www.tradeindia.com

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    7

    PROCEDURE

    1. Spread the given sample on a container and weigh the given sample.

    2. Transfer the weighed sample to the top of the sieves. Cover the top sieve with the lid and

    sieve on the rotary shaker for 10 minutes.

    3. Collect the sample retained on each sieve carefully and weigh each sieve separately by

    transferring to pre-weighed container.

    4. Plot the semi-log graph of percent passing versus sieve size.

    5. Determine Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS) and maximum size of the

    aggregates. The aggregate size distributions are classified as gap/skip graded, uniform

    graded, well/dense graded, and open graded.

    RESULTS

    Maximum density gradation by Fuller.

    P=100*(d/D)n

    Where: P is the percentage of aggregates passing the sieve size d; D is the maximum aggregate

    size in the gradation; and n is an exponent.

    The range of n is 0.45 to 0.50 depending upon the shape of the aggregate. For maximum particle

    density (spherical shape), n is 0.50. For pavement works, n is taken as 0.45 (air void

    consideration).

    Figure 1.4: Grain Size Distribution Semi Log Plot

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    8

    D10 = D30 = D60 =

    Coefficient of Uniformity, Cu = D60 / D10 =

    Coefficient of Curvature, Cc = (D30)2 / (D10x D60) =

    NMAS: is one sieve size larger than the first size to retain more than 10 percent by weight of the

    aggregates=

    Maximum size of aggregate: is the smallest sieve through which 100 percent of the particles will

    pass.

    Table 1.1: Grain Size Distribution

    Sieve size,

    mm

    Weight

    retained, g

    Cumulative weight

    retained, g

    Cumulative percentage

    weight retained

    Percent

    passing

    19.0

    9.5

    4.75

    2.36

    1.18

    0.6

    0.3

    0.15

    0.075

    Pan

    Total

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    9

    2. DENSITY DETERMINATION BY PYCNOMETER (IS 2386 (Part 3) 1963)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the density of the given aggregate sample using pycnometer

    APPARATUS

    Pycnometer

    Balance

    Figure 2.1: Pycnometer Figure 2.2: Balance

    PROCEDURE

    1) Determine the weight of the empty and dry pycnometer, designated as m0.

    2) Fill about 1/3rd of pycnometer volume with aggregate and measure the weight m1.

    3) Add water such that pycnometer as well as capillary holes are filled with water and

    measure total weight m2.

    4) Empty the pycnometer and fill it with distilled water only and measure the weight m3.

    5) Calculate the weight of water, mH2O=m3 m0.

    6) Calculate the weight of aggregate, mS = m1 - m0 and weight of added water

    mH2O = m2 - m1.

    7) Calculate aggregate volume VS and its density s as

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    10

    Vs = V - VH2O= (mH2O - mH2O) / H2O

    s= ms/ Vs

    Where: V : Volume of water that fills the empty pyconometer

    VH2O :Volume of water weighing mH2O.

    RESULTS

    m0 m1 m2 m3 mH2O mS mH2O VS s

    Density of the given aggregate sample = s

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    11

    3. SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION TEST (IS 2386 Part 3, 1963)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the specific gravity and water absorption of aggregates by using aggregate density

    basket

    APPARATUS

    Aggregate density basket

    Oven

    A container for filling water and suspending the basket

    Balance suitable for weighing of the sample container when suspended in water

    A shallow tray and two dry absorbent clothes

    Figure 3.1: Aggregate density basket Figure 3.2: Oven

    Source: www.Indiamart.com

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    12

    PROCEDURE

    1) Wash and drain 2 kg of the aggregate sample thoroughly to remove fines.

    2) Place it in the aggregate density basket and immerse the basket in distilled water at a

    temperature between 22 and 32 0C with a cover of at least 50 mm of water above the top

    of the basket.

    3) Remove the entrapped air by lifting the basket containing it 25 mm above the base of the

    tank and allowing it to drop 25 times at a rate of about one drop per second.

    4) Keep the basket and aggregate completely immersed in water for a period of 24 + 0.5

    hours afterwards.

    5) Weigh the basket and the sample (W1 g) while suspended in water at a temperature of 22

    to 32 0C.

    6) Remove the basket from water and allow it to drain for a few minutes.

    7) Transfer the aggregates to one of the dry absorbent clothes.

    8) Immerse the empty basket in water, jolt it for 25 times and weigh it in water (W2 g).

    9) Surface dry the aggregates placed on the absorbent clothes completely using both the

    clothes. 10 to 60 minutes drying may be needed.

    Note: Do not expose the surface dried aggregates to direct sunlight or any other source of heat.

    10) Weigh the surface dried aggregates (W3 g).

    11) Place the aggregates in a shallow tray and keep in an oven maintained at a temperature of

    110 0C for 24 hours.

    12) Weigh the oven dried aggregates (W4 g).

    Note: Carry out the test at least twice but not concurrently.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    13

    RESULTS

    Table 3.1: Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Calculations

    No. W1

    (g)

    W2

    (g)

    W3

    (g)

    W4

    (g)

    Weight of

    saturated

    aggregate in

    water, Ws=

    W1-W2 (g)

    Sp.

    Gravity

    = W4 /

    (W3-Ws)

    Apparent

    Sp.

    Gravity =

    W4 / (W4-

    Ws)

    Water

    Absorption(%)

    = (W3-

    W4)/W4X100

    1

    2

    Specific Gravity of the aggregates =

    Apparent Specific Gravity of the aggregates =

    Water Absorption (%) =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    14

    4. FLAKINESS INDEX TEST (IS 2386, 1963; BS 812, Part 3, 1975)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the Flakiness Index of the given aggregate sample

    APPARATUS

    A metal thickness gauge.

    IS test sieves.

    A balance accurate to 0.5% of mass of the test

    sample.

    Figure 4.1: Thickness Gauge

    PROCEDURE

    1) Carry out the sieve analysis using the sieves given in the Table 4.1.

    2) Do not use the aggregate retained on 63mm and passing 6.3mm for the tests to be carried

    out.

    3) Then weigh each of the individual size fractions retained on the sieves, other than the 63

    mm IS test sieve, and store them in separate trays. This weight is taken as M1.

    4) Calculate the individual percentage retained on each of the various sieves and discard any

    fraction of which the mass is 5% or less of mass M1. Record the remaining mass as M2.

    5) Now select the thickness gauge appropriate to the size fraction as mentioned in the Table

    4.1 and gauge each particle separately by hand.

    6) Combine and weigh all the particles passing these gauges and note this weight as M3.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    15

    Table 4.1: Dimensions of Thickness and Length Gauges

    IS test Sieve size (mm)

    Thickness Gauge

    (mm)

    Mass M1(g)

    100% Passing

    100% Retained

    Thickness Gauge

    63 50 33.9 +0.3

    50 37.5 26.3+0.3

    37.5 28 19.7+0.3

    28 20 14.4+0.15

    20 14 10.2+0.15

    14 10 7.2+0.1

    10 6.3 4.9+0.1

    RESULTS

    Sum of individual masses in trays = M1 (g) =

    Sum of individual masses in trays as described above = M2 (g) =

    Combined mass of aggregates passing gauges = M3 (g) =

    Flakiness Index of the given Aggregate sample (%) = (M3/M2)*100

    =

    Note: If no fraction as a mass 5% or less than mass M1, then M1=M2(g)

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    16

    5. ELONGATION INDEX TEST

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the Elongation Index of the given aggregate sample

    APPARATUS

    A metal length gauge.

    IS test sieves as mentioned in Table 5.1

    A balance accurate to 0.5% of mass of the test sample.

    Figure 5.1: Length Gauge

    PROCEDURE

    1. Carry out the sieve analysis using the sieves given in Table 5.1.

    2. Discard all aggregate retained on the 50.0 mm IS test sieve and all aggregate passing the 6.3

    mm IS test sieves.

    3. Weigh and store each of the individual size fractions retained on the other sieves in separate

    trays with their size marked on the tray.

    4. Sum the individual masses in the trays as M1 and calculate the individual percentages retained

    on each of the various sieves. Discard any fraction whose mass is 5% or less of mass M1, and

    record the remaining mass as M2.

    5. Select the length (elongation) gauge appropriate to the size fraction as mentioned in the Table

    5.1 and gauge each particle separately by hand.

    Note: Elongated particles are those whose greatest dimension prevents them from passing

    through the gauge

    6. Now combine and sum all these elongated samples and record their weight as M3.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    17

    Table 5.1: Dimensions of Thickness and Length Gauges

    BS test Sieve size (mm)

    Length Gauge

    (mm)

    Mass M1(g)

    100% Passing

    100% Retained

    Length Gauge

    63 50 -

    50 37.5 78.7+0.3

    37.5 28 59.0+0.3

    28 20 43.2+0.3

    20 14 30.6+0.3

    14 10 21.6+0.2

    10 6.3 14.7+0.2

    RESULTS

    Sum of individual masses in trays = M1 (g) =

    Sum of individual masses in trays as described above = M2 (g) =

    Combined mass of Elongated Samples = M3 (g) =

    Elongation Index of the given Aggregate Sample (%) = (M2/M3)*100 =

    Note: If no fraction as a mass 5% or less than mass M1 then, M1=M2(g)

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    18

    6. LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST (IS 2386 (part iv) - 1963, AASHTO T 96, ASTM C 131)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the Los Angeles abrasion value for given aggregate sample

    APPARATUS

    Los Angeles Abrasion Testing Machine

    Abrasive Charge Cast iron or steel balls

    Test sieve 1.70 mm IS sieve

    Balance of capacity 10 kg

    Oven

    Tray Figure 6.1: Balance

    Figure 6.2: Oven Figure 6.3: Los Angeles Machine

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    19

    PROCEDURE

    The test sample consists of clean aggregates dried in oven at 105 110C. The sample should

    conform to any of the grading shown in Table 6.1.

    1) Select the grading to be used in the test such that it conforms to the grading being used in

    the construction, to the maximum extent possible.

    2) Take 5 kg of sample for grading A, B, C & D and 10 kg for grading E, F & G.

    3) Choose the abrasive charge as per Table 6.2 depending on the grading of aggregates.

    4) Place the aggregates and abrasive charge in the cylinder and fix the cover.

    5) Rotate the machine at a speed of 30 33 revolutions per minute. The number of

    revolutions is 500 for grading A, B, C & D and 1000 for grading E, F & G. The machine

    should be balanced and driven such that there is uniform peripheral speed.

    6) Stop the machine after desired number of revolutions and discharge material to a tray.

    7) Sieve the entire material on tray through 1.70 mm IS sieve.

    8) Weigh the material retained on 1.70 mm IS sieve correct to one gram.

    RESULTS

    Original weight of aggregate sample = W1 g

    Weight of aggregate sample retained = W2 g

    Weight passing 1.7mm IS sieve = W1 - W2 g

    Los Angeles Abrasion Value = (W1 - W2) / W1 X 100

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    20

    Table 6.1: Grading of test samples

    Sieve size Weight of test sample (g)

    Passing

    (mm)

    Retained

    on (mm) A B C D E F G

    80 63 2500*

    63 50 2500*

    50 40 5000* 5000*

    40 25 1250 5000* 5000*

    25 20 1250 5000*

    20 12.5 1250 2500

    12.5 10 1250 2500

    10 6.3 2500

    6.3 4.75 2500

    4.75 2.36 5000

    *Tolerance of 12 percent permitted.

    Table 6.2: Selection of Abrasive Charge

    Grading No. of Steel balls Weight of charge (g)

    A 12 5000 25

    B 11 4584 25

    C 8 3330 20

    D 6 2500 15

    E 12 5000 25

    F 12 5000 25

    G 12 5000 25

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    21

    7. SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMEN (IS: 1202 1978; AASHTO T209-11, 2011; ASTM D 2041-11, 2011)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the specific gravity of a given bitumen sample

    APPARATUS

    Specific gravity bottles of 50ml capacity

    Water bath

    Bath thermometer Range 0 to 44oC, Graduation 0.2oC

    Figure 7.1: Specific Gravity Bottle

    PROCEDURE

    1) At first, clean, dry and weigh the specific gravity bottle along with the stopper and this

    weight is taken as Weight A.

    2) Now fill the specific gravity bottle with freshly boiled distilled water and slot in the

    stopper firmly.

    3) Keep this bottle is kept in the water bath having a temperature of 27.0 + 1oC for not less

    than half an hour and its weight is taken as Weight B.

    4) Weigh the specific gravity bottle about half-filled with bitumen and weigh it. This is

    noted as Weight C.

    5) Now pour the distilled water to remaining half portion of the above bottle filled with

    bitumen and note the weight as Weight D.

    6) Repeat the above experiment one more time.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    22

    RESULTS

    Table 7.1: Specific Gravity Calculation

    Grade of Bitumen:

    A (g) B (g) C (g) D (g) Specific Gravity =(C-A )/[(B-A)-(D-C)]

    Test 1

    Test 2

    Specific gravity of the given bitumen Sample= Average specific Gravity of both the test results

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    23

    8. PENETRATION TEST (IS: 1203: 1978, BS 1426: 2000, ASTM D5 97, 1997)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the penetration of a given sample of bitumen

    APPARATUS

    Standard Penetrometer

    Water bath

    Bath thermometer Range 0 to 44oC, Graduation 0.2oC

    Figure 8.1: Standard Penetrometer Figure 8.2:PenetrometerNeedle

    PROCEDURE

    1) Soften the bitumen above the softening point by heating it between 75 and 100 oC.

    2) Remove air bubbles and water by stirring the softened sample thoroughly.

    3) Make sure bitumen should be just sufficient to fill the container to a depth of at least

    15mm in excess of the expected penetration.

    4) Cool the bitumen sample at an atmospheric temperature of 15 to 30 oC for 1.5 hours.

    5) After that place it in a transfer dish in the water bath at 25 + 0.1 oC for 1.5 hours.

    6) Keep the container on the stand of the penetration apparatus and adjust the needle such

    that it makes contact with the surface of the sample.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    24

    7) Adjust the dial gauge reading to zero.

    8) Release the needle for exactly 5 seconds and then record the dial gauge reading expressed

    in tenths of a millimeter.

    9) Repeat the above procedure three times.

    RESULTS

    Table 8.1: Penetration values of the sample

    Grade of bitumen:

    No. Dial gauge reading Penetration value (0.1 mm)

    1

    2

    3

    Final Penetration Value (mm) = Average of the three readings

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    25

    9. DUCTILITY TEST (IS: 1208 1978;ASTM D113-07, 2007; AASHTO T51-08, 2008)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the ductility of a given sample of bitumen

    APPARATUS

    Standard briquette mould

    Water bath

    Testing machine

    Thermometer Range 0 to 44oC, Graduation 0.2oC

    Figure 9.1: Ductility Testing Machine Figure 9.2: Standard Briquette Mould

    PROCEDURE

    1) Heat the bituminous material to be tested to a temperature of 75 to 100oC above the

    approximate softening point until it becomes thoroughly fluid.

    2) Assemble the mould on a brass plate (Figure 9.2).

    3) Thoroughly coat the surface of the plate and the interior surfaces of the sides of the

    mould with a mixture of equal parts of glycerin and dextrin to prevent the material under

    test from sticking to the surface.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    26

    4) Pour the material in a thin stream back and forth from end to end of the mould until it is

    more than level full.

    5) Leave it to cool at room temperature for 30 to 40 minutes and then place it in a water bath

    maintained at the specified temperature for 30 minutes.

    6) Now, remove the excess bitumen by means of a hot, straight-edged putty knife or spatula

    to make the mould just level full.

    7) Place the brass plate and mould with briquette specimen in the water bath at the specified

    temperature for about 85 to 95 minutes.

    8) Remove the briquette from the plate; detach the side pieces and the briquette

    immediately.

    9) Attach the rings at each end of the two clips to the pins or hooks in the testing machine

    and pull the two clips apart horizontally at a uniform speed, as specified, until the

    briquette ruptures.

    10) Measure the distance in cm at which the rupture occurs.

    Note: While the test is being done, make sure that the water in the tank of the testing machine

    covers the specimen both above and below by at least 25mm and the temperature is maintained

    continuously within 0.5oC of the specified temperature.

    RESULTS

    Table 9.1: Ductility values of the sample

    Grade of Bitumen -

    No. Ductility (cm)

    1

    2

    3

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    27

    Note: A normal test is one in which the material between the two clips pulls out to a point or to a

    thread and rupture occurs where the cross-sectional area is minimum. Report the average of

    three normal tests as the ductility of the sample, provided the three determinations be within

    0.5 percent of their mean value.

    If the values of the three determinations do not lie within 0.5 percent of their mean, but the two

    higher values are within 0.5 percent of their mean, then record the mean of the two higher

    values as the test result.

    Ductility (cm) = Average of the three readings

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    28

    10. SOFTENING POINT TEST (IS: 1205, BS2000-58, ASTM D36-95, 1995, AASHTOT53-06, 2006)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the softening point of a given bitumen sample

    APPARATUS

    Ring and ball apparatus

    Thermometer -Low Range : -2 to 80oC, Graduation 0.2oC

    -High Range: 30 to 200oC, Graduation 0.5

    oC

    Figure 10.1: Ring and Ball Apparatus Figure 10.2: Thermometer

    PROCEDURE

    Preparation of sample

    1) Fill the ring with the sample. Cut off the excess sample by a knife.

    2) Heat the material between 75 and 100oC. Remove air bubbles and water by stirring it and

    then, filter it through IS Sieve 30, if necessary.

    3) Heat the rings and apply glycerin.

    4) Now fill the material in rings and cool it for 30 minutes.

    5) Use a warmed, sharp knife to remove the excess material.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    29

    For Materials of softening point below 80oC

    6) Assemble the apparatus with the rings, thermometer and ball guides in position.

    7) Fill the beaker with boiled distilled water at a temperature 5.0 0.5 oC per minute.

    8) With the help of a stirrer, stir the liquid and apply heat to the beaker at a temperature of

    5.0 0.5 oC per minute.

    9) Apply heat until the material softens and allow the ball to pass through the ring.

    10) Record the temperature at which the ball touches the bottom, which is nothing but the

    softening point of that material.

    For Materials of softening point above 80 oC

    The procedure is the same as described above. The only difference is that instead of water,

    glycerin is used and the starting temperature of the test is 35 oC.

    RESULTS

    Softening point (oC) = the temperature at which the ball touches the bottom

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    30

    11. FLASH & FIRE POINT TEST (IS: 1205, BS2000-58, 1958, ASTM D36-95, 1995, AASHTO T53-06, 2006)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the Flash & Fire point test of a given bitumen sample

    APPARATUS

    Cleaveland apparatus

    Thermometer-Low Range: -7 to 110 oC, Graduation 0.5 oC

    -High Range: 90 to 370 oC, Graduation 2

    oC

    Figure 11.1:Cleveland apparatus

    PROCEDURE

    Note: Bitumen is just sufficient to fill the cup up to the mark given on it.

    Flash Point

    1) Heat the bitumen between 75 and 100 oC & remove the air bubbles and water by stirring

    the sample.

    2) Fill the cup with the bitumen to be tested up to the mark & place it on the bath. Fix the

    open clip; insert the thermometer of high or low range as per requirement and also the

    stirrer, to stir the sample.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    31

    3) Light the test flame and supply heat at such a rate that the temperature increase, recorded

    using a thermometer is neither less than 5oC nor more than 6

    oC per minute.

    4) Note the temperature at which first flash appears when test flame is bought close to the

    surface of the material. This temperature is noted as Flash point temperature.

    Note: Do not get confused with the bluish halo that sometimes surrounds the test flame with the

    true flash.

    Fire Point

    5) After flash point is obtained, heating should be continued at such a rate that the increase

    in temperature recorded by the thermometer is neither less than 5oC nor more than 6

    oC

    per minute.

    6) Now light a test flame and adjust it so that it is of the size of a bead 4mm in diameter.

    7) Finally note that thermometer at which the application of test flame causes the material to

    ignite and burn for at least 5 seconds. This temperature is noted as Fire point temperature.

    RESULTS

    Flash point temperature (oC) =

    Fire point temperature (oC) =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    32

    12. DETERMINATION OF BINDER CONTENT FOR ASPHALT MIX

    (IRC: SP 11 1988 (Appendix - 5), ASTM D 2172-95, 1995, AASHTO T 164-08, 2008)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the binder content in the asphalt mix by cold solvent extraction

    APPARTUS

    Binder Centrifuge Extractor

    Balance of capacity 500 g and sensitivity 0.01 g

    Thermostatically controlled oven with capacity up to 250oC

    Beaker for collecting extracted material

    Figure 12.1: Binder Centrifuge Extractor Figure 12.2: Precision Balance

    PROCEDURE

    1) Take a known weight (W1) of representative sample and place it in the bowl of extraction

    apparatus.

    2) Add benzene to the sample until it is completely submerged.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    33

    3) Take a dry filter paper with weight (F1) and place it over the bowl of the extraction

    apparatus containing the sample.

    4) Clamp the cover of the bowl tightly.

    5) Place a beaker under the drainpipe to collect the extract

    6) Allow sufficient time (not more than an hour) for the solvent to disintegrate the sample

    before running the centrifuge.

    7) Run the centrifuge slowly and then gradually increase the speed to a maximum of 3600

    rpm.

    8) Maintain the same speed till the solvent ceases to flow from the drainpipe.

    9) Run the centrifuge until the bitumen and benzene are drained out completely.

    10) Stop the machine, remove the cover and add 200ml of benzene to the material in the

    extraction bowl and the extraction is done in the same process as described above.

    11) Repeat the same process not less than three times till the extraction is clear and not darker

    than a light straw color.

    12) Collect the material from the bowl of the extraction machine along with the filter paper

    and dry it to constant weight in the oven at a temperature of 105 to 1100C and cool to

    room temperature.

    13) Weigh the material (W2) and the filter paper (F2) separately to an accuracy of 0.01 g.

    RESULTS

    W1 (W2 + W3)

    Percentage of binder in the total mix = ---------------------- x 100

    W1

    W1 = Weight of sample taken

    W2 = Weight of sample after extraction

    W3 = Increased weight of filter paper (F2 F1)

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    34

    Table 12.1: Binder content calculation

    Sample No. W1 (g) W2 (g) F1 (g) F2(g) W3 (g) Binder Content (%)

    1

    2

    3

    Final Binder Content (%) = Average of three samples

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    35

    13. BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL METHOD (ASTM D1559, 1993)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine optimum binder content of given bituminous mix by Marshall Method of Mix

    Design

    APPARATUS

    Mould Assembly: Cylindrical moulds of 10 cm diameter and 7.5 cm height consisting of

    a base plate and collar extension.

    Sample Extractor

    Compaction Pedestal and Hammer: Used to compact a specimen by 4.54 kg weight with

    45.7 cm height of fall.

    Breaking Head: Used to test the specimen by applying a load on its periphery

    perpendicular to its axis in a loading machine of 5 tones capacity at a rate of 5 cm/min.

    Loading Machine: Measures the maximum load supported by the test specimen at a

    loading rate of 50.8 mm/min at 60 0C.

    Flow Meter: An attached dial gauge measuring the flow value as a result of the loading in

    0.25 mm increments.

    Thermometers

    Water Bath

    Oven

    Figure 13.1: Mould Assembly

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    36

    Figure 13.2: Sample Extractor Figure 13.3: Loading Machine

    Figure 13.4: Oven Figure 13.5: Compaction Pedestal and Hammer

    PROCEDURE

    In the Marshall test method of mix design three compacted samples are prepared for each binder

    content. At least four binder contents are to be tested to get the optimum binder content.

    1) Prepare a mix of coarse aggregates, fine aggregates and mineral filler material in such a

    proportion that final mix after blending has the graduation within the specified range

    (Table 13.2).

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    37

    2) Take approximately 1200 grams of aggregates and filler, and heat them to a temperature

    of 175 to 195 0C.

    3) Clean the compaction mould assembly and rammer, and heat to a temperature of 100 to

    145 0C. Heat the bitumen to a temperature of 121 to 138

    0C and add the required quantity

    of first trial percentage of bitumen to the heated aggregate and thoroughly mix using a

    mechanical mixer or by hand mixing with trowel.

    4) Then heat the mix at a temperature of 150to 160 0C.

    5) Transfer the mix into the pre-heated mould and compact it by giving seventy five blows

    on each side.

    6) Soon after the compacted bituminous mix specimens have cooled to room temperature,

    take the sample out of the mould using the sample extractor and measure the weight,

    average thickness and diameter of the specimen. Weigh the specimens in air and then in

    water.

    7) Determine the theoretical specific gravity of the mix using the known specific gravity

    values of different aggregates, filler and bitumen.

    8) Calculate the bulk density value of the specimen from weight and volume.

    9) Then immerse the specimen to be tested under water in a thermostatically controlled

    water bath maintained at 60 10C for 30 to 40 minutes.

    10) Take out the specimens from the water bath and place them in the Marshall loading

    machine to measure the marshal stability and flow values.

    11) If the average height of the specimen is not exactly 63.5mm, then correct the Marshall

    Stability value of each specimen by applying the appropriate correction factor (Table 1).

    12) Plot five graphs with values of bitumen content against the values of density, Marshall

    Stability, voids in mineral aggregates(VMA), flow value and voids filled by

    bitumen(VFB).

    13) Let the bitumen contents corresponding to maximum density be B1, corresponding to

    maximum stability be B2 and that corresponding to the specified voids content (at 4.0%)

    be B3. Then the optimum bitumen content for mix design is given by:

    Bo= (B1+B2+B3)/3.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    38

    RESULTS

    The optimum Bitumen Content of the given mix, Bo =

    =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    39

    Data Sheet 1

    Specification for Aggregate Selection

    No. Sieve size (Passing)

    Specificatio

    n Range

    (%) Pass

    Our

    Selection

    %

    Retained

    Sample Wt.

    (g)

    0 25.0 mm to 19.0 mm 100

    1 19.0 mm to 12.5 mm 66 95

    2 12.5 mm to 9.5 mm 54 88

    3 9.5 mm to 4.75 mm 37 70

    4 4.75 mm to 2.36 mm 26 52

    5 2.36 mm to 1.18 mm 18 40

    6 1.18 mm to 600 m 13 30

    7 600 m to 300 m 8 23

    8 300 m to 150 m 6 16

    9 150 m to 75 m 4 10

    10 < 75 m (filler) Pan 0

    Total wt. = 1200 g

    % of Total

    Aggregate

    Coarse Aggregate =

    Fine Aggregate =

    Filler (Agg. dust) =

    % Bitumen Wt. of bitumen

    Specific

    Gravity

    Coarse Aggregate

    Fine Aggregate

    Filler

    Bitumen

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    40

    Data Sheet 2

    Aggregate grading type :

    Mixing temp. oC :

    Grade of Bitumen :

    No. of blows :

    Compaction temperature :

    % Asphalt by

    Weight of

    Total

    Aggregate

    Mix

    Weight of specimen (g) Gbcm Stability Flow

    In Air In Water

    1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    41

    Data Sheet 3

    Asphalt % by

    weight of Total

    Aggregate Mix

    Gbcm Volume Gbam Gmp VMA Pav

    Stability

    Flow Obs. Corr.

    Table 13.1: Correction Factors

    Volume of

    Specimen

    (cm3)

    Thickness

    of

    Specimen

    (mm)

    Correction

    Factor

    457 470 57.1 1.19

    471 482 68.7 1.14

    483 495 60.3 1.09

    496 508 61.9 1.04

    509 522 63.5 1

    523 535 65.1 0.96

    536 546 66.7 0.93

    547 559 68.3 0.89

    560 573 69.9 0.86

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    42

    Table 13.2: Aggregate Specifications

    Table 13.3: Specifications for Marshall Properties

    Sieve Size

    (mm)

    Percent by Passing Weight

    Type 1

    Base course

    Type 2

    Binder or

    leveling

    course

    Type 3

    Wearing

    course

    37.5 100 25 72 100 100 19 60 - 89 82 - 100 100

    12.5 46 - 76 60 - 84 66 95

    9.5 40 - 67 49 - 74 54 88

    4.75 30 - 54 32 - 58 37 70

    2.36 22 - 43 23 - 45 26 52

    1.18 15 - 36 16 - 34 18 40

    0.6 10 28 12 25 13 30

    0.3 6 22 8 20 8 23

    0.15 4 14 5 13 6 16

    0.075 2 8 4 7 4 10

    Asphalt

    cement (% by

    weight of

    total

    aggregate)

    3.5 - 5.0 4.0 - 6.5 4.5 - 6.5

    Description

    Type 1 Base course Type 2 Binder or

    leveling course

    Type 3 Wearing

    course

    Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max.

    Marshall specimens (ASTM D

    1559) No. of comp. Blows, each

    end of specimen

    75 75 75

    Stability, kg. 350 500 600 Flow, 0.25 mm 8 16 8 16 8 16

    VMA 13 14 15 Air voids, % 3 8 3 8 4 6

    Aggregate voids filled with

    bitumen, % 60 80 65 85 70 85

    Immersion compression

    specimen (AASHTO T 165)

    index of retained strength, %

    70 70 70

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    43

    Figure 13.6: Typical plots for Marshall Test

    Note: Refer to the textbook for examples

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    44

    14. SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC) (AASHTO T 312-11, 2011)

    OBJECTIVE

    To prepare specimens of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the Superpave gyratory compactor to

    determine the volumetric and mechanical properties of the mixture

    APPARATUS

    Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) meeting the requirements of AASHTO T 312

    Molds meeting the requirements of AASHTO T 312

    Chute, mold funnel or both (Optional)

    Scale meeting the requirements of AASHTO M 231 Class G 5

    Oven, thermostatically controlled, capable of maintaining set temperature within 3C

    Thermometers accurate to 1C between 10 and 232 C Note 1: Non-Contact thermometers are not acceptable.

    Miscellaneous pans, spoons, spatulas, hot pads, gloves, paper discs, markers, etc.

    Figure 14.1: Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC)

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    45

    PROCEDURE

    1) Prepare the laboratory asphalt mixture by batching the aggregates, mixing in the proper

    amount of binder, conditioning the prepared mixture approximately 4700 g to provide

    enough material for a finished specimen height of 115 5 mm.

    2) Turn on the power to compactor for the warm up period as recommended by the

    manufacturer prior to the time the HMA is ready for compaction.

    3) Check the settings of the compacter,

    -Internal Angle: 1.16 0.02

    -Ram Pressure: 600 18 kPa

    -Number of gyrations: (From Table 14.1)

    4) Preheat the mold, base plate, and funnel in an oven at 93 C for 30-60 minutes to prevent

    the asphalt mix from sticking to molds during the compaction process and sticking in the

    funnel during sample preparation.

    5) Heat the asphalt mixture in an oven at 132 C. When the asphalt mixture reaches 132 C,

    remove the heated mold and base plate from the oven and place a paper disk in the

    bottom of the mold.

    6) Mix the entire sample to be compacted with a heated spoon and then carefully put the

    sample in a funnel. With the funnel, place all the mixture into the mold. With a heated

    spoon or spatula level the mix in the mold and place a paper disk on the top.

    7) Load the mold into the compactor and center the loading ram. Set the pressure, angle

    setting, and gyrations per minute. Start the compactor and wait for the compaction

    process to finish.

    8) When completed, remove the mold assembly from the compactor. The specimens can be

    removed immediately from the mold after compaction for most HMA mixes. In order to

    insure the specimen does not get damaged, a cooling period of 5 to 10 minutes in front of

    a fan may be necessary.

    9) Remove the specimen with an extrusion jack. Remove the paper disks from the top and

    bottom of the specimen.

    Notes: Before testing, the gyratory compactor should be calibrated periodically for

    pressure, height, angle, and rotation to make sure compactor is within specifications.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    46

    RESULTS

    Table 14.1: AASHTO R 35 Superpave Gyratory Compaction Effort

    20-Year Design Traffic, ESALs

    (millions)

    NDesign(Number of Design

    Gyrations)

    < 0.3 50

    0.3 to < 3 75

    3 to < 10 100

    10 to < 30 100

    > 30 125

    Number of Design Gyrations =

    DISCUSSION

    .

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    47

    15. DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER

    OBJECTIVE

    To measure the in-situ strength and thickness of soil layers underlying the bound pavement

    layers

    APPARATUS

    Dynamic cone Penetrometer

    Measuring scale

    Figure 15.1: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer

    PROCEDURE

    1) Assemble the DCP by attaching the cone tip, connect upper and lower shafts.

    2) Test the soil layer beneath a bound pavement layer by cutting a hole through the bound

    pavement layer of at least 50mm in diameter.

    3) Place the DCP on the test surface or insert DCP in the center of the hole and carryout

    seating operation.

    4) Establish a reference for reading the penetration of the shaft after each blow; do not

    record penetration during seating operation.

    5) Raise the hammer to its upper limit and allow it to fall freely without lifting the shaft.

    Note: Be careful to not influence the drop by forcing the hammer down.

    6) Record the reading and the blow count by reading the shaft to the nearest millimeter.

    7) Repeat steps 5 and 6 until the cone is driven to the full depth of lower shaft, the total

    penetration is less than 3mm for ten consecutive drops or the desired depth is reached.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    48

    Note: Do not remove the DCP by forcefully striking the hammer against the handle. This will

    damage the DCP.

    RESULTS

    The vertical movement of DCP cone produced by one drop of hammer,

    Dynamic Penetration Index, DPI (mm/blow) = (PR2 PR1)/ (DN2 DN1)

    =

    Where, PR Penetration reading

    Log10 (CBR) = 2.48-1.057 * Log10 (DPI)

    CBR =

    DISCUSSION

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    49

    Table 15.1: DCP Testing

    Drop

    Number

    (DN)

    Rod Reading

    (mm)

    Invert Reading

    (mm)

    Penetration Index

    (mm/blow)

    Estimated

    CBR

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    50

    16. BENKELMAN BEAM DEFLECTION MEASUREMENTS (IS 2386 (Part IV) - 1963, BS 812, Part 3, 1975)

    OBJECTIVE

    To determine the rebound deflection of a pavement surface

    APPARATUS

    A Benkelman beam

    Figure 16.1: Benkelman Beam

    A truck or trailer with an rear axle load of 8170kg equally distributed on two dual tired

    wheels

    A tire pressure of 5.6 kg/cm2 for loading the pavement

    A thermometer with a range of 0-6 C in 1 C divisions

    A mandrel suitable for making a 100mm deep hole in the pavement for inserting the

    thermometer

    A can containing either glycerol or oil for filling the thermometer hole

    PROCEDURE

    Calibration of Benkelman Beam

    1. Calibrate the Benkelman Beam so that to ensure that the dial gauge and beam are

    working correctly. This is done as described below.

    2. Place the beam and level it on a hard surface.

    3. Place a metallic block of known thickness under the probe and read the dial gauge

    reading.

    4. If the beam is in order then the dial gauge reading would be half of that of the metallic

    block otherwise the dial gauge is checked and replaced if necessary.

    5. If the dial gauge is functioning correctly then the beam pivot is checked for smooth and

    free movements.

    6. Check the dial gauge spindle beneath the striking plate to ensure that it is tightly secured

    and has not become grooved by the dial gauge stylus.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    51

    Deflection measurements

    Deflections shall be measured as follows:

    1. Select a section of a road with preferable length not less than 1 km. In each of these

    sections a minimum of 10 points are marked at equal distance to measure deflections in

    the outer wheel path.

    Note: For highway pavements following table should be referred to select the Test points.

    The interval between the points should not be more than 50m in a lane. If for roads having more

    than one lane, mark the points on adjacent lanes in a staggered fashion.

    Lane Width

    (Meters)

    Distance from lane Edge

    (Meters)

    < 3.5 0.6

    >3.5 0.9

    Divided 4 lane Highway 1.5

    If the highest or lowest deflection values in a group of ten differs from the mean by more

    than one-third of mean then extra deflection measurements is made at 25m on either

    side of point where high or low values are observed.

    2. Center the dual wheels of the truck above the selected point.

    3. The probe of the Benkelman beam is inserted between the duals and placed on the

    selected points.

    4. Release the locking device and adjust the rear of the beam so that the plunger is in

    contact with the stem of the dial gauge.

    5. Set the dial gauge at approximately 1 cm and record the initial reading when rate of

    deformation of the pavement is equal or less than 0.025 mm per minute.

    6. After initial reading is recorded, the truck is slowly driven a distance of 270 cm and

    stopped.

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    52

    7. Now record the dial gauge reading with truck at the above mentioned position and note

    that the recording is done when the rate of recovery of the pavement is equal to or less

    than 0.025mm per minute.

    8. Move the truck further by 9m.

    9. Record the final reading when the rate of recovery of the pavement is equal to less than

    0.025 mm per minute.

    10. Also record the pavement temperature at least once every hour inserting thermometer in

    the standard hole with the hole filled with glycerol.

    Note: Check the tire pressure at an interval of 2-3 hours and adjust to the standards

    RESULTS

    If (Di Df) 0.025 mm

    Actual deflection (XT) = 2 (Di Df)

    =

    If (Di - Df) > 0.025 mm,

    Actual deflection (XT) = 2(Di Df) + 2.91 [2 (Df Di)]

    =

    1. Rebound Deflection= 2 x XT

    =

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    53

    Table 16.1: Calculation of Rebound Deflection

    Chainage

    (m)

    Pavement

    Temperature,

    (0C)

    Initial

    Reading(D0)

    (mm)

    Intermediate

    Reading(Di)

    (mm)

    Final

    Reading(Df)

    (mm)

    Rebound

    Defection, x

    (mm)

    2. Mean deflection = x = x / n

    =

  • CiSTUP, IISc Advanced Pavement Engineering Laboratory

    54

    3. Standard deviation = = ( ( x x )2 / n-1)

    =

    4. Characteristic Deflection = Dc = x +

    =

    DISCUSSION