Reading/Lecture 2 Civil Liberties & Civil Rights Civil Liberties Civil Rights.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 2.
12
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 2
-
Upload
morris-wells -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
3
Transcript of AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 2.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties part 2
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Democracy depends on free expression of ideas.
“The freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained
but by despotic governments.”
~ Declaration of Rights . .. Virginia, 1776
The 1st Amendment
Congress shall make no law . . .
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
“I read no law abridging to mean
no law abridging”
Hugo Black Supreme Court Justice 1937–1971
“The most stringent protection of
free speech would not protect a
man in falsely shouting ‘fire’ in
a theater and causing a panic.”
Oliver Wendell Holmes Supreme Court Justice 1902–1932
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Key Issues
Balancing of freedom of expression with values such as:
• Need for public order• National security• Right to a fair trial • Equality & Fairness
And . . . what exactly constitutes “speech”?
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
“The true meaning of freedom of speech seems to be this. One of the most important purposes of society and government is the discovery and spread of truth on subjects of general concern. This is possible only through absolutely unlimited discussion . . .
Nevertheless, there are other purposes of government, such as order, the training of the young, protection against external aggression.
Unlimited discussion sometimes interferes with these purposes, which must then be balanced against freedom of speech, but freedom of speech ought to weigh very heavily in the scale.”
- Zechariah Chafee – Harvard Professor of Law
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Prior Restraint
Case?
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
Case?
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
Newspapers protected from prior restraint
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Public Order
Case?
Schenck v. United States (1919)
“Clear and present danger” test
Case?
Schenck v. United States (1919)
“Clear and present danger” test
Now . . . “Imminent lawless action”
Upheld conviction of a Socialist encouraging draft resistance
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
National Security & Prior Restraint
Case?
NY TIMES v. UNITED STATES (1971)
Case?
NY Times v. United States (1971)
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Obscenity
Cases?
Roth v. United States (1957)
“utterly without redeeming social importance”
Miller v. California (1973)
. . . not protected speech
. . . use community standards
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Libel & Slander
Case?
v. Sullivan (1964)
Actual malice &Reckless disregard for the truth
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of SPEECH
Symbolic Speech
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Mary Beth & John Tinker (1965)
Threat = No NoSymbolic Expression = OKFlag burning
= symbolic expression
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties
FREEDOM of ASSEMBLY
Back to . . .
Balancing of freedom with values such as:
• Need for public order• Freedom of others not to be bothered
Has resulted in the following constitutional limits / restrictions:
• Time• Place• Manner
