AP Micro Wage Deteremination

33
Wage Determinatio n HELP WANTED 28 C H A P T E R

Transcript of AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Page 1: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wage

Determination

HELP

WANTED

28C H A P T E R

Page 2: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wages Defined...Wages - - Salary - - Earnings

Wage RateNominal WagesReal Wages

International differences...

LABOR, WAGES, AND EARNINGS

Page 3: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

0 5 10 15 20 25GermanyDenmark

SwitzerlandUnited States

JapanSweden

United KingdomFrance

CanadaItaly

AustraliaKorea

TaiwanMexico

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVEHourly Wages of Production Workers,Selected Nations

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2003

Hourly Pay in U.S. Dollars, 2001

Page 4: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

GENERAL LEVEL OF WAGES

Role of Productivity•Plentiful Capital•Access to Abundant Natural Resources

•Advanced Technology

•Labor Quality

Page 5: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

REAL WAGES ANDPRODUCTIVITY

Growth in real income (earnings) Growth in output per worker-hour

Can only grow at

about the same rate!

Page 6: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

PURELY COMPETITIVELABOR MARKET

Purely competitive labor market:Many Firms

Numerous Qualified Workers

“Wage Taker” Behavior

Page 7: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Non-LaborCosts

LaborCosts

PURELY COMPETITIVE LABORMARKET EQUILIBRIUM

Labor Market

S

D = MRP( mrp’s)

Wc

(1000)

Individual Firm

S = MRC

d = mrp

Wc

Quantity of Labor

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)

Quantity of Labor

($10)

(5)

$10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10

IncludesNormalProfit

Page 8: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Non-LaborCosts

LaborCosts

IncludesNormalProfit

Labor Market

S

D = MRP( mrp’s)

Wc

(1000)

Individual Firm

S = MRC

d = mrp

Wc

Quantity of Labor

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)

Quantity of Labor

($10)

(5)

$10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10

Marginal ResourceCost (MRC) will be

constant and equal toresource price(the wage rate)

PURELY COMPETITIVE LABORMARKET EQUILIBRIUM

Page 9: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

MONOPSONY MODEL•Single Buyer of a type of labor

•The type of labor is relatively immobile “Wage Maker” Behavior Upward-Sloping Supply

Curve to Firm

Page 10: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)S

Quantity of Labor

MONOPSONISTICLABOR MARKET

In monopsonyMRC lies above

the supply curve.

Page 11: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)

MRP

S

Wm

Quantity of Labor

MRC

Qm

MONOPSONISTICLABOR MARKET

MRP = MRC

Qm units oflabor hired

Page 12: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)

MRP

S

Wm

Quantity of Labor

MRC

Wc

Qm Qc

The competitivesolution would

result in a higherwage and greater

employment.

MONOPSONISTICLABOR MARKET

Page 13: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wa

ge

Ra

te (

do

llars

)

MRP

S

Wm

Quantity of Labor

MRC

Wc

Qm Qc

The competitivesolution would

result in a higherwage and greater

employment

MONOPSONISTICLABOR MARKET

Monopsonists maximizeprofits by hiring a smaller

number of workers andthereby paying a less-than-

competitive wage rate.

Page 14: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D1

S

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSDemand-Enhancement Model

Page 15: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Qu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D1

S

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

D2

...by increasingproduct demand

THREE UNION MODELSDemand-Enhancement Model

Page 16: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Qu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D1

S

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

D2

...by increasingproduct demand...by increasingproductivity

THREE UNION MODELSDemand-Enhancement Model

Page 17: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Qu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D1

S

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

D2

...by increasingproduct demand...by increasingproductivity...by increasingthe price ofsubstitutes

THREE UNION MODELSDemand-Enhancement Model

Page 18: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSExclusive or Craft Model

S1

Page 19: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSExclusive or Craft Model

Qu

S1

...restrictive membership policiesS2

Page 20: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSExclusive or Craft Model

Qu

S1

...restrictive membership policies...restricting labor supply of the economy as a whole

S2

Page 21: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSExclusive or Craft Model

Qu

S1

...restrictive membership policies...restricting labor supply of the economy as a whole…occupational licensing

S2

Page 22: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSInclusive or Industrial Model

D

S

...by organizing virtually all workers and thereby control of the supply curve for labor causing…

Page 23: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

THREE UNION MODELSInclusive or Industrial Model

Qu

D

...by organizing virtually all workers and thereby control of the supply curve for labor causing…

S

Qe

Page 24: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

WAGE INCREASESAND UNEMPLOYMENT• Union members receive about 15% higher wages

• Negative impact on level of employmentNegative

unemployment effect reduced by:

GrowthElasticity

Page 25: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

BILATERAL MONOPOLY MODELMonopsonist & Union SeekDifferent Wage Rates...

…economic theorycannot

determine the actual

outcome.

MRC

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

D=MRP

S

Qu=Qm

Wm

Page 26: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

MRC

Wu

Wag

e R

ate

(do

llar

s)

D

Quantity of Labor

Wc

Qc

BILATERAL MONOPOLY MODELMonopsonist & Union SeekDifferent Wage Rates...

D=MRP

S

…economic theorycannot

determine the actual

outcome.

Qu=Qm

Wm

Desirability of Bilateral Monopoly

Page 27: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

MINIMUM WAGECONTROVERSY

•Case Against Minimum Wage•Case For Minimum

Wage•Evidence and Conclusions

Page 28: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

WAGE DIFFERENTIALSMarginal Revenue Productivity

Noncompeting Groups•Ability•Education and Training

•Investment in Human Capital

Page 29: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

WAGE DIFFERENTIALSCompensating Differences

•Nonmonetary Differences

Market Imperfections

•Lack of Job Information

•Geographical Immobility

•Unions & Government Restraints

•Discrimination

Page 30: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE

The Principal-Agent Problem

Incentive Pay Plan• Piece Rates• Commissions or

Royalties• Bonuses, Stock

Options, & Profit Sharing

• Efficiency Wages

Page 31: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

PAY FOR PERFORMANCENegative Side-Effects

of Pay for Performance•Poor Product Quality•Questionable or Fraudulent Sales Practices

•Disruption of Teamwork

•Free Ride by Low Producers

•Low Turnover Decreases Hiring Opportunities

Page 32: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

wage ratenominal wagereal wagepurely competitive labor marketmonopsonyexclusive unionismoccupational licensinginclusive unionism

bilateral monopolyminimum wagewage differentialsmarginal revenue productivitynoncompeting groupsinvestment in human capitalcompensating differences incentive pay plan

ENDBACKCopyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Inc. 2005

Page 33: AP Micro Wage Deteremination

Next:

Rent, Interest, and Profit

Chapter 29