Antiepileptic drugs related rash
-
Upload
chulalongkorn-allergy-and-clinical-immunology-research-group -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
328 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Antiepileptic drugs related rash
LOGO
AntiEpileptic Drugs Related
Rash Jaichat Mekaroonkamol, MD.
Contents
Adverse effect of AED 1
Pathogenesis and cross sensitivity 2
Predisposing factors and In vitro
assessment
3
Management 4
Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 792–802
Expert Rev. Neurother. 886 10(6), (2010)
Adverse reactions
CNS
AED
Non-CNS
• Most common
• Occur during
initiation of Tx
• Dose-related
• Reversible
• Common
• Idiosyncratic - Rash
- Hepatotoxicity
- Hematologic
- Renal effect
- Metabolic and
endocrine
• 120 adult (Age > 18 years)
• descriptive cross sectional hospital
based study
Dose related
Hussein A, et al. OMJ. 25, 17-21 (2010)
Idiosyncheratic
N=45 N=42 N=35 N=38
10%
Hussein A, et al. OMJ. 25, 17-21 (2010)
Types of skin reactions
Herbert AA, Ralston JP.. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 (Suppl 14):22-26
Specific reactions to
anticonvulsant drugs
Herbert AA, Ralston JP.. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 (Suppl 14):22-26
Specific reactions to
anticonvulsant drugs
Herbert AA, Ralston JP.. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 (Suppl 14):22-26
AED related rash
Benign
Rash
SCARs
• Morbilliform
/ measles-
like rashs
• SJS
• TEN
• DRESS
Benign Skin Rash
• Skin rash extremely common
complications of AED
– Phenytoin/carbamazepine: 7-12%
– Lamotrigine: 8-10%
• Morbilliform rashes usually occur within
3-8 wk of drug initiation, more likely to
occur when AEDs are started rapidly
• Usually be discontinued to minimize risk
for a severe skin reaction
– Resolve within 1-2 weeks after
discontinuing
Epilepsia 1999
• Retrospective study
• 1,890 outpatients with epilepsy
• Aged >/= 16 years: 1,649 (87%)
• 15 AEDs
• Subgroup analysis
– Non-AED predictors
– with another AED rash
– without another AED rash
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
• Phenytoin 5.9%
• Lamotrigine 4.8%
• Carbamazepine 3.7%
• Topiramate <1%
• Valproate 0.7%
• Levetiracetam 0.6%
• Gabapentin 0.3%
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
262/1649 = 15.9%
AED predictors
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
AED predictors
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
OR 3.1 (1.8-5.1)
AED predictors
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
4.1% vs 2.4%
• AED-related allergy without rash
was not a predictor of AED rash
– Hepatitis 42/1,649 = 2.5%
– Fever 31/1,649 = 1.8%
• The mean time to appearance of a
rash was 18.1 (± 10.5)days after
starting an AED.
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
A valuable finding was that the
risk of AED linked rash is
approximately five-times more
likely in patients who have had a
previous AED rash (8.8%) than
those who did not (1.7%)
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:1701–1709
Cross-sensitivity of skin rashes
• Cross-sensitivity among aromatic AEDs
(CBZ, LTG, OXC, PHT, PB) is said to
occur in 40–58% of patients
• High as 80% in an in vitro assay
• Specific cross-sensitivity among CBZ,
PHT, and PB may be at least partially
explained by the “hapten hypothesis”
• LTG: P-I concept
Neurology 71 November 4, 2008
CBZ, PHT, and PB
LTG
Neurology 71 November 4, 2008
• 3793 outpatients
• 3.61% (137/3793)
of patients
experienced a skin
rash
• Cross-reactivity
rates between
certain AEDs are
high, especially
CBZ and PHT
X.-q. Wang et al. Seizure 19 (2010) 562–566
X.-q. Wang et al. Seizure 19 (2010) 562–566
X.-q. Wang et al. Seizure 19 (2010) 562–566
AED related rash
Benign
Rash
SCARs
• Morbilliform
/ measles-
like rashs
• SJS
• TEN
• DRESS
Histology: SJS
• Early
– Perivascular mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate
comprised primarily of T-lymphocytes.
– at the dermoepidermal junction, with lymphocytes
clustered around dying basal keratinocytes
("satellitosis")
• As the lesions progress
– frank subepidermal vesiculation develops, with full
thickness epidermal necrosis.
• Fully developed SJS
– full thickness epidermal detachment with splitting
above the basement membrane, minimal inflammatory
infiltrate, and normal immunofluorescence.
Arch Dermatol. 1992
Histology: TEN
• The histopathology of TEN is similar in
SJS.
• In addition – abnormalities of the underlying sweat ducts have
been described in TEN, including lymphocytic
infiltration, basal cell hyperplasia, and necrosis
J Cutan Pathol. 1995
AED induced SCARs
• Different ethnic populations may have
dissimilar risks regarding the
development of AED-SCARs due to
various genetic backgrounds
• CBZ-induced SJS/TEN
– 59 cases per 100,000 new users per year in
Taiwan.
– 2 cases of 100,000 new exposures a year
have been reported in the United States
– much higher in South-East Asian countries
than in Western countries
Allergol Int 2010
• Retrospective study
• 6-year period from January 2003 to
December 2009
• At 2 clinical branches of Chang
Gung Memorial Hospital
• 154 patients with AED induced
SCARs
Neurology December 6, 2011
• CBZ and PHT were the most common causative
AEDs
– SJS/TEN (67.8%)
– DRESS (43.6%)
• No SCARs case was caused by nonaromatic AEDs
Neurology December 6, 2011
• Average latent period in AED-induced SJS/TEN or
DRESS was about 20 days ( DRESS has a longer)
• Average doses for tolerant controls were much
higher
Neurology December 6, 2011
AED-SCARs are not associated with the
AED dose or exposure duration
Neurology December 6, 2011
Most of the patients were well tolerant to nonaromatic
AEDs, especially VPA.
Prognosis of AED-SCARs
Neurology December 6, 2011
• The overall mortality rate was 6.49%
(10/154)
– TEN: 50%
– SJS-TEN: 20%
– SJS: 1%
– DRESS: 7.7%
• PHT was the major AED to cause
mortality(8/10 deaths) PHT-SCARs
had more complicated
Epilepsy Currents, Vol. 6, No. 2 (March/April) 2006
AED
AED
Predisposing factors
• HLA-B 1502
– SJS/TEN induced by CBZ, PHT
• HLA-A 3101
– CBZ-ADR in Japanese
• CYCP2C19*2
– SCARs from PH
• HLA-B 4001
• HLA-B 5801 Protective AED-SJS/TEN
HLA-B 1502
Screening for HLA-B*1502 has been
recommended by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) prior to
starting CBZ in patients with
ancestry from these populations
since December 2007
HLA-B 1502
• 31 case: 10 AED-SJS, 21 AED-MPE
• 50 control: at least 3 months
• Age 10-45 years
• Exclude patients who developed SJS after
simultaneous use of more than one drug
• As soon as, they developed cutaneous adverse
reactions, all medications were withdrawn
Epilepsia, 49(12):2087–2091, 2008
• HLA-B 1502
– CBZ-SJS: 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity
43% PPV, 100% NPV
– PHT-SJS: 100% sensitivity, 82% specificity
33% PPV, 100% NPV
Epilepsia, 49(12):2087–2091, 2008
Epilepsia, 54(7):1307–1314, 2013
• 55 case: SJS/TEN
• 275 control: at least 3 months
• Age 6-77 years
Epilepsia, 54(7):1307–1314, 2013
Phenytoin
Lamotrigine
Epilepsia, 54(7):1307–1314, 2013
Protective AED-SJS/TEN
• CYP2C19, a member
of cytochrome P450
enzymes
• plays an essential
role in bioactivating
and detoxifying
pathways of aromatic
AED
• most common variant
resulting in poor
metabolizer are
CYP2C19*2(0.27) and
CYP19*3(0.02)
Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013
Toxic metabolite
Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013
• CYP2C19*2 variant
– SCARs from phenobarbital
• 42% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 65% PPV, 47% NPV
In vivo assessment
• Patch tests
• Late intradermal reading
• 10 subjects (7 females, 3 males),
• Age 8 to 42 years (mean age, 21.50 ± 10.99 yr)
• Performed 23.50 ± 40.45 months (range, 1 to 120) after
the adverse reaction
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2006
• 34 control group subjects (23 females, 11males)
• Age from 7 to 55 years (mean age 24.56 ±12.04 years)
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2006
Patch positive
Contact Dermatitis 2010: 62: 47–53
Drug Safety 2009; 32 (5)
• The PPV of the test in optimal
conditions was as high as 80–90%
depending on the drug tested.
• It should be performed 2–6 months
after recovery from the date of the
ADR for best results
Drug Safety 2009; 32 (5)
In vitro assessment
Lymphocyte transformation tests
• 10 subjects (7 females, 3 males),
• Age 8 to 42 years (mean age, 21.50 ± 10.99 yr)
• Performed 23.50 ± 40.45 months (range, 1 to 120) after
the adverse reaction
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2006
• 34 control group subjects (23 females, 11males)
• Age from 7 to 55 years (mean age 24.56 ±12.04 years)
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2006
LTT positive
Positive responses to aromatic anticonvulsants were
observed in 9 (26.5%) of the 34 control group subjects
Mol Diagn Ther 2009
• Sensitivity of the LTT and the LTA
seem to be around 70% and 90%
• However, the lack of a gold-
standard diagnostic test to prove
drug culpability
• Timing: 5 weeks to 1 year
Mol Diagn Ther 2009
Treatment of AED-SCARs
1. Supportive care
2. Corticosteroids
3. IVIG
4. Combination therapy of IVIg and
systemic corticosteroids
Ciclosporin, TNF antagonists (Infliximab,Etanercept),
Plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide
IVIG for TEN
• anti-Fas potential of pooled human IVIG
in vitro
• total IVIG doses of more than 2 g/kg may
be of greater benefit
Neurology December 6, 2011
1. Corticosteroids
– 84.42% for SJS/TEN and DRESS
2. Supportive care: 14.94%
3. IVIG: 0.65%
4. Combination therapy of IVIg and systemic
corticosteroids: 6.49%
Prognosis of AED-SCARs
Neurology December 6, 2011
• The overall mortality rate was 6.49%
(10/154)
– TEN: 50%
– SJS-TEN: 20%
– SJS: 1%
– DRESS: 7.7%
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
• PHT and CBZ are the two drugs which most
frequently cause sensitivity
• Cross-sensitivity among aromatic AEDs occur
in 40-58%
• Rarely nonaromatic AEDs induced SCARs
• Most of the patients with AED-rashs were well
tolerant to nonaromatic AEDs, especially VPA.
• CBZ- and PHT-induced SJS, but not MPE, is
associated with HLA-B∗1502 allele in Thai
population
• In vivo and in vitro assesment lack of validated
studied
• Treatment are controversial
LOGO