Antenna Fundamentals

SURIANO / SURIANO /HOLMES /YU

InterferenceTechnology.com INTERFERENCE TECHNOLOGY 1

ANTENNAS

CANDACE SURIANO, PH.D.Suriano Solutions

JOHN SURIANO, PH.D.Nidec Motors Auburn Hills, MI

TOM HOLMESAgilent Technologies Tipp City, OH

QIN YUAlcatel-Lucent Columbus, OH

HOW DOES AN ANTENNA PICK UP A signal and convert it to something useful to a receiving circuit? What

is the current path for the signals received or transmitted from an antenna? Why are there different types of antennas, and why do they have different shapes? What are the standard engineering terms associated with antenna technology? How are signals from antennas amplified?

The subject of antennas may seem beyond reach for many engineers, but a working knowledge of the operation and functional characteristics of antennas is an essential component of the EMC knowledge base. It is the starting point for understanding many EMC requirements and test procedures and for resolving compliance issues. The basics of antennas can be deduced from fundamental principles of electromagnetics and electric circuits. Even a rudimentary understanding can prove to be invaluable in solving EMC problems.

HOW DO ANTENNAS DETECT SIGNALS?Antennas have two complementary func-

tions: converting electromagnetic waves into voltage and current used by a circuit, and converting voltage and current into electromagnetic waves which are transmitted into space. Signals are transmitted through space by electromagnetic waves consisting of electric fields measured in Volts per meter and magnetic fields measured in Amps per meter. Depending on the type of field being detected, the antenna takes on a particular construction. Antennas designed to pick up electric fields, like the antenna of Figure 1(a), are made with rods and plates while antennas made to pick up magnetic fields, as in Figure 1(b), are made from loops of wire. Sometimes parts of electric circuits may have characteristics that unintentionally make them antennas. EMC is concerned with re-ducing the probability of these unintentional antennas injecting signals into their circuits or influencing other circuits.

Consider the antenna of a car radio. As the electric field (V/m) hits the antenna it impresses a voltage along its length (m*V/m = V) relative to ground. The receiver detects the voltage between the antenna and ground. Another way to think of this type of antenna

Antenna fundamentalsA proper understanding of antennas requires familiarity with electromagnetics, circuit theory,

electronics, and signal processing.

Figure 1. (a) Electric field antenna and (b) magnetic field antenna.

ElectricField

V

MagneticField

I

I

2 INTERFERENCE TECHNOLOGY EMC DIRECTORY & DESIGN GUIDE 2007

ANTENNAS ANTENNA FUNDAMENTALS

is as one lead of a voltmeter measuring the potential in space. The other lead of the voltmeter is the ground of the circuit.

WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF AN ANTENNA’S SHAPE?Some antennas are made of loops of wire. These antennas detect the magnetic field rather than the electric field. Just as a magnetic field through a coil of wire is produced by the current in that coil, so too a current is induced in a coil of wire when a magnetic field goes through that coil. The ends of the loop antenna are attached to a receiving circuit through which this induced current flows as the loop antenna detects the magnetic field. Magnetic fields are generally directed perpendicular to the direction of their propagation so the plane of the loop should be aligned parallel to the direc-tion of the wave propagation to detect the field.

Some types of electric field antennas are biconical, horn, and microstrip. Generally, antennas that radiate electric fields have two components insulated from each other. The simplest electric field antenna is the dipole antenna, whose very name implies its two-component nature. The two conductor elements act like the plates of a capacitor with the field between them projecting out into space rather than being confined between the plates. On the other hand, magnetic field antennas are made of coils which act as inductors. The inductor fields are projected out into space rather than being confined to a closed magnetic circuit. The categorization of antennas in this way is somewhat artifi-cial, however, since the actual mechanism of radiation involves both electric and magnetic fields no matter what the construction.

HOW DO ANTENNAS FORM AND RADIATE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS?As previously mentioned, electric field antennas can be related to capacitors. Consider a simple parallel plate ca-pacitor shown in Figure 2(a). The electric field that occurs when a charge is placed on each of the plates is contained in be-tween the plates. If the plates are spread apart so that they lie in the same plane, the electric field between the plates ex-tends out into space. The same process occurs with an electric field dipole an-

tenna as shown in Figure 2(b). Charges on each part of the antenna produce a field into space between the two halves of the antenna. There is an intrinsic capacitance between the two rods of the dipole antenna as shown in Figure 2(c). Current is required to charge the dipole rods. The current in each part of the antenna flows in the same direction. Such current is called antenna mode current. This condition is special be-cause it results in radiation. As the signal applied to the two halves of the antenna oscillates, the field keeps reversing and sends out waves into space.

The charge and current on the dipole create fields that are perpendicular to each other. The electric field, E, flows from the positive charge to the negative charge placed on the elements by voltage applied to the antenna as shown in Figu-re 3(a). Charging current applied to the antenna makes a magnetic field, H, that circulates around the wire according to the right hand rule as shown in Figure 3(b). God made it so that when electrons move along the wire a magnetic “wind” is produced which circulates around the wire. Directing one’s right thumb in the direction of the current flow, the fingers wrap around the wire in the direction of the magnetic field. The circulation of this magnetic field results in induc-tance of the antenna. The antenna is therefore a reactive device having both

capacitance from the charge distribu-tion and inductance from the current distribution.

As shown in Figure 3(c), the E and H fields are perpendicular to each other. They spread out into space from the antenna in a circular fashion. As the signal on the antenna oscillates, waves are formed. Transverse Electromagnetic (TEM) waves are produced in which E and H are perpendicular to each other. The antenna can also convert a TEM wave back into current and voltage by something called reciprocity. The anten-na has complementary behavior when sending and receiving.

The condition of antenna radiation is shown in Figure 4. The reactive com-ponents of the antenna store energy in the electric and magnetic fields su-rrounding the antenna. Reactive power is exchanged back and forth between the supply and the reactive components of the antenna. Just as in any L-C cir-cuit where the voltage and current are always 90° out of phase, so too with an antenna the E field (produced by voltage) and the H field (produced by current) are 90° out of phase if the resis-tance of the antenna is neglected. In an electric circuit, real power is delivered only when the load has a real compo-nent to its impedance that causes a component of the current and voltage to be in-phase. This circumstance also

Figure 2. (a) Capacitor circuit, (b) dipole, (c) dipole showing intrinsic capacitance and charging current.

Figure 3. (a) Electric field E and (b) magnetic field H and TEM field from dipole charge and current.



ANTENNAS

holds true with antennas. The antenna has some small resistance so there is a component of real power delivered that is dissipated in the antenna. For radiation to occur, E and H fields must be in-phase with each other as shown in Figure 3(c). With the antenna acting as both a capacitance and an inductance, how can this radiation take place? The in-phase components are the result of propagation delay. The waves from the antenna do not instantly form at all points in space simultaneously, but rather propagate at the speed of light. At distances far away from the antenna, this delay results in a component of the E and H fields that are in phase.

Thus, there are different components of the E and H fields that comprise the energy storage (reactive) part of the field or the radiated (real) part. The reactive portion is dictated by the capacitance and inductance of the antenna and exists predominately in the near field. The real portion is dictated by something called radiation resistance, caused by the pro-pagation delay, and exists at large dis-tance from the antenna in the far field. Sometimes receiving antennas, such as those used in EMC testing, may be pla-ced so close to the source that they are influenced more by the near field effects than the far field radiation. In this case, the receiving and transmitting antennas are coupled by capacitance and mutual inductance. The receiving antenna thus acts as a load on the transmitter.

HOW DOES THE ANTENNA IMPEDANCE CHANGE WITH FREQUENCY?Antenna impedance is a function of frequency. The current and charge distribution on the antenna change with frequency. The current on a di-pole is generally shaped as a sinusoidal function of position on the antenna as dictated by the frequency. Since the wavelength of a signal is dependent on the frequency, at certain frequencies

the antenna length is equal to key frac-tions of a wavelength. The current on a dipole for frequencies resulting in ½ and 1 wavelength is shown in Figure 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. At ½ wavelength, the current from the source is maximal. The input impedance of the antenna at this frequency is therefore minimum, equivalent to the resistance of the an-tenna (actual + radiation resistance). At a frequency that has a wavelength the same as the antenna length, the current from the source is zero; and therefore, the input impedance is infinite. A plot of the impedance vs. frequency is shown in Figure 5(c).

DO ANTENNAS RADIATE IN ALL DIRECTIONS?The power from an antenna radiates in a pattern that may not be uniform in all directions. To characterize the antenna gain, the ratio of the power radiated in a given direction to the power density if radiation occurred uniformly in all directions (distributed over the sur-face of a sphere) is used. For a dipole antenna, most of the power radiates in the direction perpendicular to the axis of the antenna as shown in Figure 3. The directivity of an antenna is the gain in the direction of the maximum power, which is the direction perpendicular to the axis of a dipole. Gain is measured in dBi = 10*log (Gain).

The three- or two-dimensional ra-

diation pattern from an antenna is also called a power pattern, power plot, or power distribution. It visually illustrates how an antenna receives or transmits in a certain range of frequencies. It is normally plotted for the far field. An antenna radiation pattern is primarily affected by the geometry of the antenna. It is also affected by the surrounding landscape or by other antennas. Some-times multiple antennas are used in an antenna array to affect directivity. As shown in Figure 6(a), two antennas fed by the same source can be used to cancel the fields in the plane of the antennas if they are spaced by ½ wavelength. The top view of this arrangement is shown in Figure 6(b) with a sketch of the power pattern.

MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF REFLECTIONS?When we look into a mirror, we see the effect of reflections of electromagnetic radiation. Why do waves bounce off conductive surfaces? What is the result of these reflections on radiation? The basis for reflections is the boundary condition of the fields on the surface of a conductor. Boundary conditions for E and H fields are shown in Figure 7. Inside the conductor, charges are free to move when influenced by electric fields and current is induced by time-varying magnetic fields. A charge nearby the conductor causes charges to migrate on

Figure 5. (a) Dipole current with ½ wave excitation, (b) full wave excitation, (c) dipole impedance.

Figure 4. Power flow resulting in radiation.

Figure 6. (a) Side view of half wave dipole array and (b) top view with power distribution.



the conductor surface. Any tangential component of the E field would cause the charges to move until the tangential component of E is zero. The resulting ef-fect is equivalent to the image, or virtual charge, located below the conductor surface shown in Figure 7(c). The image isn’t real, but represents the charge that would cause an equivalent effect to the actual result.

A magnetic field that is time-varying induces a current in the perfect conduc-tor. The current opposes the magnetic field so that no normal component can penetrate the conductor surface. Thus the current image shown in Figure 7(c) causes the resulting normal component of H to disappear at the surface.

The effect of the image is very impor-tant because antennas are often nearby

conductive surfaces such as the Earth, or the sheet metal of a car or airplane, or the ground plane of a circuit board. The fields that radiate into space are the sum of those from the antenna and those from the image. If we consider the E-field from a dipole, it is easy to see the effect. In Figure 8(a) a dipole parallel to conductor is shown with its image. When the dipole is perpendicular to the ground plane, an image of the dipole with inverted charge exists below it—as shown in Figure 8(b). In these two exam-ples, the field at some point in space is the sum of the fields from the dipole and its image. When the field radiating from a dipole hits the conductor, as shown in Figure 8(c), the reflection can be inter-preted as the wave from the image.

HOW ARE SIGNALS FROM ANTENNAS CONDITIONED AND AMPLIFIED?Antennas are connected to transmitters or receivers through transmission lines. Since the antenna impedance is not a constant function of frequency, it cannot be matched to the transmission line at all frequencies. When the antenna im-pedance does not match the impedance of the transmission line (usually 50 Ω or 75 Ω), reflections are formed at the connection to the antenna. Waves that come from the source are reflected back down the transmission line reducing the ability to transmit power. The VSWR, voltage standing wave ratio, is a measure of the mismatch. VSWR is the ratio of the maximum voltage to minimum voltage on the transmission line. With an impedance mismatch, the VSWR is greater than one, indicating the presence of reflections. As the impedance at the end of the transmission line becomes higher—approaching open circuit, the VSWR approaches infinity, indicating that all the power is reflected. This situ-ation is similar to the incidence of a light beam at an interface between two media, such as air and water, in which some light is reflected and some goes into the water. VSWR reduces the amount of power transmitted to the antenna or reduces the signal from the antenna when it is used to receive signals. The change in VSWR and the proportion reflected are shown in Figure 9(a) and 9(b), respectively, for a 50-Ω system, in which the load resistance is varied.

Another problem with connecting to antennas is signal unbalance caused by a ground plane. Figure 10(a) shows a dipole antenna connected to a source through a shielded cable. The shield is connected to the ground plane. Parasitic capacitance between the antenna and the ground plane causes some current to flow through the ground plane ra-ther than through the shield. When this occurs, the current on the antenna is unbalanced, and the antenna loses efficiency. To correct this imbalance, a device called a balun (balanced to unbalanced) is used. A simple type of balun is shown in Figure 10(b). Here, the balun is comprised of a ferrite cylinder (bead) placed over the coaxial cable. The ferrite increases the impedance only for

Figure 7. (a) E and H fields are disrupted by perfect conductor, (b) tangential E and normal H must be zero at boundary, (c) image of charge or current in conductor to satisfy boundary conditions.

Figure 8. (a) Dipole parallel and (b) perpendicular to conductor and image and (c) reflection of wave from dipole explained by considering effect of image.

A A

B B

C C



ANTENNAS

Figure 9. (a) VSWR and (b) ratio of reflected to forward power as load resistance varies in 50W system.

Figure 10. (a) Common-mode current due to ground plane coupling and (b) use of simple balun.

the common mode current and has no effect on the normal differential mode current in the cable. Consequently, the current that causes the unbalance is reduced, improving the operation of the antenna. For receiving antennas, the incoming signal may induce current on the shield that causes the unbalance. The ferrite bead reduces the current on the shield.

Antennas are used to receive very small signals. It is therefore often neces-sary to use an amplifier to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The thermal noise floor of the environment, if detected by a 9-kHz bandwidth, is approximately –27 dBμV (-134 dBm). However, when signals are processed and amplified to useable levels, noise is introduced. The noise figure of an amplifier is defined as the difference between its noise floor and the ambient noise of the environ-ment. Consider an antenna picking up a signal that is only 0 dBμVas shown in Figure 11(a). The signal may be 27 dB above the ambient; but to a receiver with a 24-dB noise figure, the signal is only 3 dB above the noise floor. Thus, the signal-to-noise ratio is only 3 dB. A

good amplifier can be used to increase this margin as shown in Figure 11(b). Here, a 20-dB amplifier raises the signal level from 0 dBμV to 20 dBμV. The am-

plifier also raises the ambient by 20 dB to –7 dBμV. Since the amplifier has an 8-dB noise figure, it then adds another 8 dB to the ambient making it +1 dBμV. The noise floor of the receiver (-3 dBμV) is below this figure and thus does not affect the result. The new signal-to- noi-se ratio is 19 dBμV.

SUMMARYA proper understanding of antennas requires familiarity with electromag-netics, circuit theory, electronics, and signal processing. Such knowledge is indispensable to the EMC engineer who must interpret test results, improve accuracy and sensitivity of tests, and suggest ways to eliminate unintentional antennas from product designs.

BIBLIOGRAPHYW.L. Weeks, Antenna Engineering, McGraw-Hill

Book Co., New York, 1968William H. Hayt, Jr., Engineering Electromagnet-

ics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1981Warren L. Stutzman and Gary A. Thiele, Antenna

Theory and Design, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1998.

Clayton R. Paul and Syed A. Nasar, Introduction to Electromagnetic Fields, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1982.

“Fundamentals of RF and Microwave Noise Figure

Figure 11. Signal to noise ratio (a) without and (b) with amplification.



Measurements,” Agilent Application Note 57-1, Agilent TechnologiesClayton R. Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, John Wiley

& Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.

CANDACE R. SURIANO received her doctorate in Electrical Engineering in 2003 from the University of Dayton. Candace is involved with consulting, IEEE Southeastern Michigan work and parenting under the auspices of Suriano Solutions. She is a member of the Kettering University Electrical Engineering Department Advisory Board. She has one patent in the area of EMC. Candace has been chair of the Basic Antenna and Probe Workshop at four of the IEEE EMC symposiums. Candace and John Suriano work together in many areas—they have had six children and five papers together.

JOHN R. SURIANO received his doctorate in Electrical Engineering in 1992 from Purdue University. He works for Nidec Motors & Actuators. John has 13 patents and has authored numerous papers on electric machines and electromagnetic compatibility.

TOM HOLMES is an Applications Engineer for Agilent Technologies special-izing in RF/microwave measurements and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). He has a BEE from Kettering University ( formerly GMI) and extensive experience in automotive electronic systems and EMC, as well as RF and microwave measurements. He holds three patents for emissions

suppression circuits, and has published several papers on EMC suppression and modeling. Interests include his awesome wife Barbara, his grandson EJ (age 12), ham radio, and Corvettes.

QIN YU, of Alcatel-Lucent, is a 1996 graduate (Ph.D.) from The Ohio State University in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Qin received her M.S. degree in 1988 and B.S. degree in 1985 from Southeast University in China in the Department of Electrical Engineering. She worked on prod-uct EMI related modeling, design and troubleshooting and suppression while working for ITT Automotive, Inc. as an EMC design engineer. Qin is presently a Member of Technical Staff at Alcatel-Lucent. Her current job function is to ensure the compliance of products with both regulatory EMC and radio equipment certification requirements, including defin-ing the product regulatory requirements, conducting radio equipment certification, reviewing product EMC design and trouble-shooting and suppressing product EMI problems. The OneBTS Common Platform Project that Qin worked on won 2002 Bell Laboratories President’s Gold Award. The CDMA Modcell Platform Evolution and Cost Reduction Project on which Qin worked was named as a Silver Award winner of the 2002 Bell Laboratories President Award. Qin was also presented with 2002 Lucent Technologies Hill Climbers Innovation Award. Qin published more than 18 technical papers as the primary author on journals and proceedings of international conferences. ■

Antenna Fundamentals

Documents

Transcript of Antenna Fundamentals