Antecedents of turnover intention & employee engagement: A study of Gen-Y employees in Malaysia

67
ANTECEDENTS OF TURNOVER INTENTION & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: A STUDY OF GEN-Y EMPLOYEES LIEW JIN YEAN (1001130514)

Transcript of Antecedents of turnover intention & employee engagement: A study of Gen-Y employees in Malaysia

ANTECEDENTS OF TURNOVER INTENTION & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: A STUDY OF GEN-Y EMPLOYEES LIEW JIN YEAN (1001130514)

RESEARCH BACKGROUND RESEARCH PROBLEM

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

FINDINGS IMPLICATIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS

LIMITATIONS

RESEARCH BACKGROUND

BOOMERS GEN-X GEN-Y

WORKPLACE IS MADE UP OF...

BOOMERS GEN-X GEN-Y

DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIOR

heredity environment

(Plomin, 1989)

WORKPLACE IS MADE UP OF...

GEN-Y

1977 - 1997 (Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

GEN-Y

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE

R.SHIP

work-life balance constant

feedback & recognition challenging

task

(Angeline, 2011)

1977 - 1997 (Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

GEN-Y

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE

R.SHIP

work-life balance constant

feedback & recognition challenging

task

(Angeline, 2011)

ENGAGE

collaboration

mutual respect

connect meaningfully with

leaders

opportunities to learn new skills

(Weyland, 2011)

1977 - 1997 (Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

TOTAL WORKFORCE IN MALAYSIA

YY Y

TOTAL WORKFORCE IN MALAYSIA

YY

>50%GEN-Y (Queriri, Wan Yusoff, & Dwaikat, 2014)

YY Y

TOTAL WORKFORCE IN MALAYSIA

YY

>50%GEN-Y (Queriri, Wan Yusoff, & Dwaikat, 2014)

HIGHEST

RATE OF

TURNOVER

(Sujansky & Ferri-Reed, 2009)

YY Y

TOTAL WORKFORCE IN MALAYSIA

YY

>50%GEN-Y (Queriri, Wan Yusoff, & Dwaikat, 2014)

HIGHEST

RATE OF

TURNOVER

(Sujansky & Ferri-Reed, 2009)

60% plan to leave within the first 3

years of being hired! (Gedeon, 2013)

revamp HR practices & org

culture retain Gen-Y ->

the future leader face

consequences of high cost of

turnover

OR

TO

(Davidson, Timo, & Wang, 2010; Experience Inc., 2008; Fitz-Enz,

1997)

IMPORTANT FOR COMPANIES TO...

RESEARCH PROBLEM

DESPITE EXISTENCE OF VARIOUS JOURNAL

differences of Gen-Y & how companies need to react

(Kim, Knight, & Crutsinger, 2009)

(Lim, 2012)

(Luscombe, Lewis & Biggs, 2011)

DESPITE EXISTENCE OF VARIOUS JOURNAL

specific research is needed

(Kim, Knight, & Crutsinger, 2009)

(Lim, 2012)

(Luscombe, Lewis & Biggs, 2011)

ANTECEDENTS ADAPTED FROM

VARIOUS RESEARCHES (Lewis, 2008)

(Jusoh, Simun, &

Siong, 2011)

(Saks, 2006)

ANTECEDENTS ADAPTED FROM

VARIOUS RESEARCHES (Lewis, 2008)

(Jusoh, Simun, &

Siong, 2011)

(Saks, 2006)

JOB CHARACTERISTICS

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE LEADERSHIP

COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT PERCEIVED JUSTICE

JOB CHARACTERISTICS

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE LEADERSHIP

COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT PERCEIVED JUSTICE

RIGHT MIX

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT

JOB CHARACTERISTICS

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE LEADERSHIP

COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT PERCEIVED JUSTICE

RIGHT MIX reduce

turnover

increase engage-

ment

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT

JOB CHARACTERISTICS

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE LEADERSHIP

COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT PERCEIVED JUSTICE

BOTTOM LINE reduce

turnover

increase engage-

ment

(Lockwood, 2007; Manistitya & Fongsuwan, 2015)

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT

COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT PERCEIVED JUSTICE

BOTTOM LINE reduce

turnover

increase engage-

ment

(Lockwood, 2007; Manistitya & Fongsuwan, 2015)

cost of termination

cost of hiring & training a replacement vacancy cost until the job is filled loss of productivity with a fresh recruit

(Fitz-Enz, 1997)

BOTTOM LINE reduce

turnover

increase engage-

ment

(Lockwood, 2007; Manistitya & Fongsuwan, 2015)

cost of termination

cost of hiring & training a replacement vacancy cost until the job is filled loss of productivity with a fresh recruit

if not engaged, end up using more

resources (Lockwood, 2007)

(Fitz-Enz, 1997)

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

JOB CHARACTERISTICS

POS

ORG. CULTURE

LEADERSHIP

COMMUNICATION

DECISION MAKING

DEVELOPMENT

PERCEIVED JUSTICE

TURNOVER INTENTION

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

RELA

TIO

NSH

IP

IVs DVs

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

POPULATION 577,000 Gen-Y in KL (Labour Force Survey, 2013)

rm POPULATION SAMPLING SIZE 577,000 Gen-Y in KL (Labour Force Survey, 2013) 384 for pop. 1,000,000

(Sekaran, 2003)

rm POPULATION SAMPLING SIZE

SAMPLING METHOD

577,000 Gen-Y in KL (Labour Force Survey, 2013) 384 for pop. 1,000,000

(Sekaran, 2003)

non-probability snowball

rm •  population – working Gen-Y in M’sia – KL,

Labour Force Survey (2013) -> Gen-Y in KL < 577,000

•  sampling size – Sekaran (2003) -> max size 384 for a population size of 1,000,000

•  sampling method – non-probability snowball sampling method + stratification -> ensure participants are gen-Y with 2 years working experience

•  data collection – online survey made with Google Sheets

POPULATION SAMPLING SIZE

SAMPLING METHOD DATA COLLECTION

577,000 Gen-Y in KL (Labour Force Survey, 2013) 384 for pop. 1,000,000

(Sekaran, 2003)

non-probability snowball

ONLINE SURVEY

FINDINGS

DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS

Malay13%

Chinese79%

Indian7%

Others1% ETH

NICITY

SINGLE 90.8%

MARRIED

9.2%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

SPM or lower

STPM/Foundations/A-Levels or equivalent

Diploma

Bachelor's Degree

Masters and above

HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

SALARY RANGE

TOP 3 SPECIALIZATIONS OF RESPONDENTS %

Sales/Marketing 35.9 Admin/HR 16.3

Services 10.3

YEARS OF WORKING EXPERIENCE WITH CURRENT EMPLOYER

< 1 year

≥ 1 year to < 3 years

≥ 3 years to < 5 years

≥ 5 years

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS

Cronbach Alpha, α > 0.70 = reliable (Sekaran & Bougie, 2010)

All variables, α > 0.70 = reliable

PEARSON CORRELATION

ANALYSIS

TURNOVER INTENTION

Significant Strength

Small ~ Medium DirectionNegative

HYPOTHESES ACCEPTED!

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

Significant STRENGTH

Medium DIRECTION

Positive

HYPOTHESES ACCEPTED!

IMPLICATIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Enrich body of

knowledge in M’sia

All variables vs TI & EE

mostly related to

TI

# journals LIMITED

(Khalid, Ismail & Nazali, 2013; Choi

et al., 2012; Yusoff, Kian, &

Rajah, 2013)

FOR EMPLOYERS & HR PRACTITIONERS

VARIABLE THAT HIGHLY CORRELATES WITH TURNOVER INTENTION 1

DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT hunger for personal & professional growth

(Mason, 2014; Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

DEVELOPMENT hunger for personal & professional growth

(Mason, 2014; Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

offer variety of learning opportunities in attractive formats

DEVELOPMENT hunger for personal & professional growth

Mason, 2014; Meister & Willyerd, 2010

offer variety of learning opportunities in attractive formats

ON-THE-JOB LEARNING

INDIVIDUALIZED COACHING

FEEDBACK-INTENSE TRAINING

DEVELOPMENT hunger for personal & professional growth

(Mason, 2014; Meister & Willyerd, 2010)

offer variety of learning opportunities in attractive formats

ON-THE-JOB LEARNING

INDIVIDUALIZED COACHING

FEEDBACK-INTENSE TRAINING

Eckert & Deal (2012)

VARIABLE THAT HIGHLY CORRELATES WITH EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 1

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL

SUPPORT

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL

SUPPORT

(Martin, 2005)

care about Gen-Y success in the company

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL

SUPPORT

(Martin, 2005)

care about Gen-Y success in the company

care about Gen-Y as individuals

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL

SUPPORT

(Martin, 2005)

care about Gen-Y success in the company

care about Gen-Y as individuals

take the time to get to know each Gen-Y

PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL

SUPPORT

(Martin, 2005)

care about Gen-Y success in the company

care about Gen-Y as individuals

take the time to get to know each Gen-Y

listen to what Gen-Y have to say

LIMITATIONS

6 MONTHS TIMEFRAME

500 184

x generalization

LONGER TIMEFRAME

OBTAIN MORE RESPONSE

ENSURE GENERALIZATION

Q & A

THANK YOU for your time