Annual Reports summary data for the Professional Education Unit
24
Annual Reports summary data for the Professional Education Unit 2009
description
Annual Reports summary data for the Professional Education Unit. 2009. Spring 2009 Undergraduate ITP Enrollment. The unit has roughly the same student count as last year and the same diversity percentages. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Annual Reports summary data for the Professional Education Unit
Annual Reports summary data for the Professional Education Unit
2009
Spring 2009 Undergraduate ITP Enrollment
CANDIDATE ETHNICTY American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0.00%Asian 1 0.24%Black or African American 50 11.99%Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00%Hispanic or Latino 7 1.68%White 356 85.37%Two or more races 3 0.72%Race/ethnicity unknown 0 0.00%Total 417 Female 375 89.93%Male 42 10.07%Total 417
Overall GPA 3.83 Diversity Percentage 14.63%
The unit has roughly the same student count as last year and the same diversity percentages.
GPA Comparison: Program & Unit data NOTE: THIS DATA DOES NOT FOLLOW A PARTICULAR STUDENT GROUP THESE NUMBERS ARE SOLEY BASED ON THE TERM PRESENTED
TERM 07-08Programs Enrollment Entry into Teacher Prep CompletionUnit 2.95 3.08 3.33Art 2.95 3.23 2.50Biology/Science 2.84 2.95 2.94Business 3.09CSDS 3.06 3.30Elementary 3.00 3.02 3.30Elem-Middle 3.06 3.12 3.32English 2.84 3.43 3.38History/SSE 2.93 3.17 3.60Math 3.06 3.32Middle 3.05 3.11 3.38Modern Language 2.99 3.03 3.32Music 2.80 2.60 3.60Physical Ed 2.84 3.05 3.29Special Ed. 3.00 3.03 3.32Theatre 3.44 2.51 3.86
This data may indicate that as the candidates enter teacher prep they are more focused and thus apply more time to academia or it could mean that our entrance standards in teacher prep are higher than the entrance standards in the institution.
2008-09 TERMPrograms Enrollment Entry into Teacher Prep CompletionUnit 2.98 3.09 3.35Art 3.12 3.00 3.37Science (Biol/Chem) 3.30 2.88Business 3.25CSDS 3.00 3.36Elementary 3.10 3.08 3.37Elem-Middle 3.13 2.93 3.36English 2.82 3.07 3.72History/SSE 2.77 3.09 3.51Math 3.14 2.99 3.52Middle 3.25 3.28 3.25Modern Language 3.01 3.85 3.85Music 2.85 3.23 3.11Physical Ed 2.87 2.79 3.03Special Ed. 2.97 3.33 3.15Theatre 3.02 3.26 3.49
Some changes from the previous year by program area. The same trend for the unit.
Diversity Percentage Comparison: Undergraduate Education termProgram F07-S08 F08-S09Overall Diversity 6.0% 6%Art 0% 25%Biology 0%CSDS 0% 0.0%Elementary 4% 7%Elem-Middle 11% 10%
English 0% 0.0%History/SSE 0% 0.0%Initial Licensure 0%Math 0.0%Middle 0% 0.0%Modern Language 33% 0.0%Music 0% 0.0%PHETE 10% 0.0%Special Ed 18% 14.0%Theatre 0.0% 0.0%
Diversity of ITP and Endorsement programs
Diversity Percentage Comparison: Undergraduate Education termProgram F07-S08 F08-S09Overall Diversity 6.0% 6%Art 0% 25%Biology 0%CSDS 0% 0.0%Elementary 4% 7%Elem-Middle 11% 10%
English 0% 0.0%History/SSE 0% 0.0%Initial Licensure 0%Math 0.0%Middle 0% 0.0%Modern Language 33% 0.0%Music 0% 0.0%PHETE 10% 0.0%Special Ed 18% 14.0%Theatre 0.0% 0.0%
Dispositions Assessment Comparisons
Term CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H CF9I CF9J CF9K CF9L
Fall 2006 4.60 4.48 4.44 4.34 4.58 4.73 4.70 4.55 4.78 4.56 4.53 4.58
Fall 2007 4.69 4.61 4.42 4.44 4.75 4.72 4.78 4.67 4.78 4.53 4.50 4.44
Fall 2008 4.58 4.43 4.37 4.34 4.46 4.54 4.54 4.51 4.59 4.39 4.42 4.45
Spring 2007 4.74 4.70 4.61 4.58 4.65 4.77 4.69 4.69 4.73 4.66 4.59 4.63
Spring 2008 4.85 4.85 4.82 4.81 4.85 4.87 4.90 4.87 4.86 4.82 4.83 4.82
Spring 2009 4.64 4.76 4.69 4.67 4.75 4.79 4.78 4.76 4.76 4.72 4.69 4.70
Summer 06 4.45 4.49 4.46 4.39 4.49 4.54 4.53 4.49 4.55 4.48 4.46 4.50
Summer 07 4.81 4.78 4.67 4.74 4.82 4.88 4.85 4.81 4.85 4.77 4.62 4.75
Disposition comparison of unit by semester
N=534
Average Ratings for Teacher Prep RecommendationsTerm Attendance Participation Preparation Communication Emotional Control Ethical behaviorSpring 2008 4.49 4.31 4.44 4.4 4.54 4.62Fall 2008 4.45 4.22 4.23 4.22 4.48 4.56Spring 2009 4.48 4.26 4.32 4.28 4.49 4.56
N= 533
Disposition Assessment Ratings
Term CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9FFall 2007 4.69 4.61 4.42 4.44 4.75 4.72Spring 2008 4.85 4.85 4.82 4.81 4.85 4.87Fall 2008 4.58 4.43 4.37 4.34 4.46 4.54Spring 2009 4.64 4.76 4.69 4.67 4.75 4.79
CF9A
CF9B
CF9C
CF9D
CF9E
CF9F
CF9G
CF9H
CF9I CF9J CF9K
CF9L
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
4.75 4.75
4.25
4.5
5 5 5 5 5
4.75 4.75 4.75
Overall Averages
Elem
-Mid
dle
Elem
enta
ry E
d
Englis
h
Histor
yM
ath
Mid
dle
Mus
ic
Physic
al E
duca
tion
Specia
l Edu
catio
n
Theat
er2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.60 4.61
4.75
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
4.33
5.00
4.00
Disposition Assessment Comparison by Program CF9
Elem-Middle Elementary Ed
English History Math Middle Music Physical Education
Special Ed-ucation
Theater0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00 4.804.64
4.75
5.00
4.00
4.50
5.00
3.87
5.00
4.00
4.80
4.58 4.25
5.00
4.00
4.50
5.00
3.80
5.00
4.00
Dispositions Assessment CF9B and CF9C
Elem-Middle Elementary Ed
English History Math Middle Music Physical Education
Special Ed-ucation
Theater2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Dispositions Assessments Program Comparison: CF9D,CF9E, CF9F
CF9D CF9E CF9F
CF1 CF2 CF3 CF4 CF5 LG1 LG2 LG3 LG40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF2- Planning %3's Comparison
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
DFI1 DFI2 DFI3 DFI4 DFI5 DFI60%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF-4 Implementation/Management % 3's Compar-ison
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
DFI1 DFI2 DFI3 DFI4 DFI5 DFI60%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF-4 Implementation/Management % 3's Compar-ison
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
AP1 AP2 AP3 AP4 AP5 IDM1 IDM2 IDM3 ASL1 ASL2 ASL3 ASL40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF- 5 Evaluation/Assessment %3's Comparison (TWS Indicators)
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
RSE1 RSE2 RSE3 RSE4 RSE50%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Professional Dispositions %3's Comparison
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
AP1 AP2 AP3 AP4 AP5 IDM1 IDM2 IDM3 ASL1 ASL2 ASL3 ASL40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF- 5 Evaluation/Assessment %3's Comparison (TWS Indicators)
Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
CF12 CF23 CF34 CF45 CF56 LG37 AP58 DFI59 IDM210 ASL2110%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CF-8 Diversity TWS %3's ComparisonSpring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring 08 Fall 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2006
Improved 83% of the students from the data reported by candidates
SAME; 128; 9% WORSE; 120;
8%
IMPROVES; 1228; 83%
Summary of 2009 Results
Grad Completers GPA comparisons
Program/Campus 2007-08 2008-09Overall 3.93 3.93CSDS 3.73 3.79C & I K-8 Math 3.98 3.90C & I Music 3.98 3.75Ed Leadership 3.85 3.93Elem PK-6 Initial Licensure 3.99 3.63English 3.67 3.76Grad Licensure 3.72 4.00Guidance & Counseling 3.88 3.88Literacy & Culture 3.99 3.96Modern Language Initial Lic. 3.75School Library Media 3.96 3.96Special Education 3.90 3.89Main Campus 3.92 3.86Off Campus 3.93 3.98
Graduate programs and diversity of candidates
Overal
lCSD
S
C & I K
-8 Math
C& I Music
Ed Le
aders
hip
Elem PK-6 In
itial Lic
ensu
re
Engli
sh
Grad Lic
ensu
re
Guidance
& Counseling
Litera
cy & Cultu
re
Modern La
ng.Initial
Licen
sure
School Li
brary M
edia
Speci
al Ed
ucation
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
8%
20%
0% 0% 0%
17%
33%
0% 0%7%
0%5% 6%
12.0%
0.0%
25.0%18.0%
1.0%
50.0%
33.0%
0.0%9.0% 11.8%
Diversity percentage comparison: graduate education
2008- 2009 2007-2008
Teacher Survey Responses on Conceptual Framework Standards and the Preparation Program
Term Overall CF1 Avg. CF2 Avg. CF3 Avg. CF4 Avg. CF5 Avg. CF6Avg. CF7 Avg.Fall 2007 3.09 3.12 3.15 3.21 3.18 3.14 3.19 3.18Spring 08 3.68 3.61 3.68 3.67 3.60 3.60 3.65 3.67Fall 2008 3.59 3.54 3.51 3.57 3.49 3.49 3.32 3.65Spring 09 3.69 3.66 3.69 3.69 3.61 3.62 3.58 3.58
