Annual Report to the Public 2017STEWART.pdf

2017 Curriculum and Assessment Report to Public SCOTT.pdf

Federal Report to Public 2017 SCOTT.pdf

Special Education Report to Public 2017.pdf

Technology Annual Report to the Public.pdf

Bismarck Gifted & Talented Program (1).pdf

Elementary Report to Public 2017 Lana.pdf

MIDDLE SCHOOL PUBLIC REPORT 2017.pdf

HS Annual Report to the Public 2017.pdf

Annual

Report to

the Public

Bismarck

School

DistrictSusan K. Stewart

Superintendent

2017

Bismarck Board of Education

2016/2017

Mrs. Magen Allen

Mr. Brian Hinds

Mrs. Amy Fendley

Mrs. Melissa Morrison

Mr. Ron Wright

All board members received their state-mandated annual board training (A.C.A. 6-13-629) for the 2016/2017 school year.

District Demographics

White 892 89.50%

African American 12 1.20%

Hispanic 75 7.53%

Asian 5 0.50%

Native American 8 0.80%

Hawaiian 0 0.00%

Two or More 4 0.40%

Female 481 48%

Male 515 52%

Bismarck School District 10-

Year Enrollment Pattern (Based on Oct. 1 ADM

&/or Qtrs. 1-3 Avg.)

2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18

1013 927 949 974 1018 1027 972 967 1010 996

Demographics of Students & District

Each of the BSD teachers, administrators, and classified school employees have been provided all state-mandated PD requirements, including student discipline training.

Each campus in the BSD has distributed student discipline policies to parents.

Bismarck Elementary, Middle School, and High School are fully Accredited.

School Safety training has been provided to all staff. Crisis Plans have been revised and updated in order to meet the current needs of the students and District.

All state-mandated safety trainings have been conducted. All required fire and tornado drills are conducted as mandated.

The District has adopted a parental involvement plan in compliance with A.C.A. 6-15-1702.

Demographic Info, cont…

Free/Reduced Meal Percentage *65% (TBD)

Attendance Rate 94%

Number of students transferred under A.C.A. 6-18-227 Arkansas Opportunity Public School Choice Act:

Transferred In: 18

Transferred Out: 28 (2017/18)

Number of Students Retained Per

Grade Level, 1-8

Elementary School:

Kindergarten—10

1st Grade—1

2nd Grade—0

3rd Grade—0

4th Grade—0

Middle School:

5th Grade—1

6th Grade—0

7th Grade—0

8th Grade—0

Expulsions

Truancy

Insubordination

Student Assaults

Bullying

Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Related Offenses

Fighting

Other

3

49

62

1

7

18

21

116

Discipline and Safety

District Teaching Staff

Percent with Bachelor’s Degree

Percent with Master’s Degree

Percent with Advanced Degree

42%

56%

2%

Economic

District Total Mills Voted

District Expenditure Per Student

District Average Teacher Salary

M&O Expenditures

Debt Service Expenditures

Total Expenditures (no Federal/State Categorical or Activity Funds)

Legal Ending Balance (+/- Previous Year)

41

$8,997

$43,805

$949,984

$380,312

$8,317,080

$1,606,896

+$11.00

Bismarck School District

Lion Pride is Roaring Through Bismarck!

Thank you for attending this evening. Enjoy

the remaining presentations.

Bismarck School DistrictCurriculum and Assessment

Report to the Public2017-2018

Nancy ScottCurriculum Coordinator

2017 ESEA Accountability Report

DISTRICT STATUSAchieving

English Math

Grade Level 2017

District 84%

3rd Grade 88%

4th Grade 88%

5th Grade 87%

6th Grade 86%

7th Grade 91%

8th Grade 86%

9th Grade 78%

10th Grade 75%

Grade Level 2017

District 73%

3rd Grade 85%

4th Grade 81%

5th Grade 76%

6th Grade 84%

7th Grade 68%

8th Grade 75%

9th Grade 60%

10th Grade 62%

Science Reading

Grade Level 2017

District 60%

3rd Grade 67%

4th Grade 63%

5th Grade 51%

6th Grade 65%

7th Grade 59%

8th Grade 64%

9th Grade 57%

10th Grade 52%

Grade Level 2017

District 51%

3rd Grade 46%

4th Grade 52%

5th Grade 39%

6th Grade 46%

7th Grade 44%

8th Grade 67%

9th Grade 64%

10th Grade 53%

WritingGrade Level 2017

District 58%

3rd Grade 28%

4th Grade 67%

5th Grade 45%

6th Grade 71%

7th Grade 45%

8th Grade 68%

9th Grade 70%

10th Grade 66%

ITBS Literacy ITBS Math

Grade Level

2015 2016 2017

1st

Grade67% 68% 68%

2nd

Grade61% 75% 80%

Grade Level

2015 2016 2017

1st

Grade49% 64% 76%

2nd

Grade64% 72% 77%

District Leadership Team (DLT) Focus

• Professional Learning Communities• Building Leadership Teams (BLT), Grade level,

Content level• Response to Intervention

• Individual student focused

Website Statistics

Annual Statistics

Home page 470,028Elementary 26, 950Middle School 18, 327High School 21, 754HAC 22, 341Cafeteria Menus 16, 300Athletics 11,352Total “Hits” 1,301,441

Twitter Statistics

1, 277 Tweets465 Followers1, 486 “Likes”

BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT

2017

Federal Budget Overview

Title One Programs

By Nancy Scott

Federal Coordinator

The purpose of Title I is to ensure that all children have a fair,

equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high quality

education.

Title I, Part A (Title I) of the Elementary and Secondary Education

Act provides financial assistance to schools with high numbers or

high percentages of children from low-income families to help

ensure that all children meet challenging academic standards.

Federal funds are currently allocated through four statutory

formulas that are based primarily on census poverty estimate

and the cost of education in each state.

TITLE ONE FUNDS AVAILABLE

Total Funds Accounted For

Annual Allotment $307,975.33

Carry Over from 2016-2017 $42,510.52

Total Funds $350,485.85

Title One – Part A • Salaries & Benefits-Paras $110,048

• After School Programs $49,364

• General Supplies $70,775

• Parent Involvement $4,500

• Professional Development $38,400

• Technology $34,799

• Student Assessment $9,000

• Homeless Account $1,000

• Indirect Cost to Operating $6,000

• Substitute Classified $8,000

• Instructional Supplies $18,599

TITLE II-A PROGRAM

• $40,364.02

• The purpose of the Title II, Part A,

Improving Teacher Quality is to

increase the academic achievement of

all students by helping schools and

school districts improve teacher and

principal quality and ensure that all

teachers are highly qualified.

• Classroom Size Reduction

QUESTIONS ?

THANK YOU

• Thank y0u for your

continued support

• Nancy Scott

• Federal Coordinator

BISMARCK SPECIAL EDUCATION

SERVICES

Special Services

Bismarck Special Education currently serves 123 students

Kindergarten through 12th grade (Three students are served through

First Step School in Hot Springs)

Preschool students served through Dawson Educational Services

Cooperative

7 Special Education Teachers, 1 Speech Therapist, 4

paraprofessionals, 1 Bus driver

Contract Education Examiner, Occupational Therapist, and Physical

Therapist from Independent Agencies

Academic Services: Indirect Services, Co-Taught classes,

Resource, Special Class, Private Day School, Homebound

Programs, Resources, Technology

Journey Reading Program

District Wide Implemented in 4-8 grade resource. Research-based phonics instruction with validated assessments for screening and placement

Sonday: Implemented in Elementary K-3 resource classroom

Guides beginning reading, writing, and spelling instruction, reading intervention and instruction. It is a highly effective intervention model.

Sensory Room provided for students with disabilities – Implemented for the 2017-2018 school year

Participation in Special Olympics Bowling and Swimming – Competition between other local districts

Additional Chromebooks and Ipads for special education/resource classrooms

IDEA Title VI-B Regular Allocation: $214,143.32

$ 16,000.00 First Step Speech Therapy

$ 10,000.00 Dawson Preschool Services

$ 183,444.00 Supervisor, Resource Teacher, Special Classparaprofessional, Administrative Assistance

Salary/Benefits

$ 15,149.00 Special Class, Resource Class Supplies

$ 15,699.00 Educational Examiner Salary/Supplies

$ 16,378.44 Occupational and Physical Therapies

2016-2017 Grant Funding Carryover $24,348.26

Additional income from other schools within the state $18,178.86

Amount Budgeted: $256,670.44

SPECIAL EDUCATION BUDGET

Special Education Budget

ARMAC and Medicaid

ARMAC$20,000.00 Occupational/Physical Therapy Services

Medicaid$29,034.00 First Step Tuition (3 students)

$7500.00 First Step Travel, dues/fees/supplies/training

$35,200.00 Additional Occupational/Physical Therapy

Services

$21,741.00 Paraprofessional Salary

Amount Budgeted: $93,475.00

Administration/Technology Annul Report to the Public.docx

2017 E-rate / CIPA Information

E-rate is a federal program that collects money from everyone’s phone bill and helps provide schools

and other institutions with internet and connectivity. There are two priorities in E-rate. Priority 1,

which is always funded, is for telecommunications. This is phone service, internet, and other types of

connectivity. This is the last year that we will receive any money for our phone service. Since ADE/DIS,

the state, is providing our internet connection, this is the last year we will receive any Priority 1 money.

Priority 2 is to assist in purchase network equipment. For the school year 2016-2017 we purchased

$54,798.73 worth of networking equipment to upgrade our network from 1GB between buildings to

10GB between buildings. This also provided us with ports for our wireless access points. E-rate

provided $43,838.98 of this amount.

Our internet content filter is provided by the state. We currently use CWS. We have two primary filter

categories. Students and Faculty. Both attempt to block porn. We are not very restrictive on filtering.

The main difference between the two is that the staff filter is more lenient on social media. We have

found that the internet is a useful tool. Being restrictive means that sites are not always accessible and

need to be unblocked. Also, the virtual Arkansas classes at the high school require leniency in filtering.

The term “attempt to block” is really quite accurate. Monitoring by teachers is required to keep

students on task and off of bad websites. This hasn’t really been a problem for us. We also use a

program called Hapara, which allows the teachers to view websites being accessed while students are

on the chromebooks. Teachers walking around the classroom is always the most effective means of

monitoring students. All of these other things are just additional tools.

Bismarck Gifted & Talented Program

Annual Report for the Public Academic Year 2017-2018

Program Options 2017-2018K-4 Served through Talents Unlimited 30 minutes weekly via

Classroom Teachers . Grade 4 plans are for Pull Out Program

Option after referrals are received at the end of Grade 3.

These students are tested and G/T Selection Committee

placements are made for pull outs for Grade 4.

Grade 4 Pull Out Program

Grades 5-8 Pre-AP Courses

Grades 9-12 Pre-AP and AP Courses

Additions for 2017-2018

All K-4 teachers received Talents Unlimited training this

summer. The classroom teacher continues to provide TU

WGE 30 minutes weekly with documentation sent to District

G/T Coordinator Quarterly.

Last year, the District G/T Coordinator began once per month

meetings at the Middle School and High School with G/T

students. This program addition is continued this school year

2017-18.

Bismarck Elementary SchoolAnnual Report to the Public

September 25, 2017Lana Hughes, Principal

Bismarck Elementary School

MISSION

Statement of Purpose

To provide a safe and engaging learning environment with challenging and

high expectations. To enrich the social, physical, emotional and academic well-

being of each student.

Statement of Strategy

Developmentally appropriate and engaging instruction that allows for

individual difference in learning strategies.

Statement of Value

We believe that all children are capable of learning and through the

achievement of the students the entire community benefits as well.

NEW STAFF

• Whitney Thornton – Art & PI

• Grace Carter – First Grade Math

• Tina Neel – Paraprofessional 2-4

• Julie Allsup – Paraprofessional 2-4

• Amy Parker – CBI Paraprofessional

• Ashley Thorton – CBI Paraprofessional

Active Teams

• Behavior Team

• Leadership Team

• Incentive Team

• Parent Involvement Team

• Math Team

• Reading Team

• Writing Team

• Encore

ACT Aspire READING 3rd & 4th

Ready Exceeding

Ready & Exceeding

% Rank in State & National

RANK in STATE out of 484 Elem. Schools

GRADE3

25% 21% 46% S=Top 24%N=56th

#115

GRADE 4

28% 24% 52% S=Top28%N=69th

#133

ACT Aspire MATH 3rd & 4th

Ready Exceeding

Reading & Exceeding

% Rank in State & National

RANK in STATE out of 484 Elem. Schools

GRADE 3

33% 52% 85% S=Top 3%N=83rd

#15

Grade 4

49% 32% 81% S=Top5%N=78th

#24

ACT Aspire WRITING 3rd & 4th

Ready Exceeding

Reading & Exceeding

% Rank in State & National

RANK in STATE out of 484 Elem. Schools

GRADE 3

22% 6% 28% S=Top 24%N=66th

#114

Grade 4

67% 0% 67% S=Top 2%N=92nd

#8

ACT Aspire Science

Ready Exceeding

Reading & Exceeding

% Rank in State

RANK in STATE out of 484 Elem. Schools

GRADE 3

22% 45% 67% S=Top 4%N=81st

#17

Grade 4

38% 25% 63% S=Top 10%N=75th

#48

ACT Aspire ENGLISH 3rd & 4th

Ready Exceeding

Reading & Exceeding

% Rank in State

RANK in STATE out of 484 Elem. Schools

GRADE 3

22% 66% 87% S= Top 10%N=73rd

#47

Grade 4

35% 53% 88% S=Top 8%N=69th

#40

GRADE 1ITBS 2016-2017

Nat. % Rank486 total elementary schools

READING 68% #32 of 486

VOCAB 63% #41 of 486

MATH 65% #76 of 486

GRADE 2ITBS 2016-2017

Nat. % Rank490 total elementary schools

READING 73% #31 of 490

VOCAB 66% #45 of 490

MATH 71% #72 of 490

KINDERGARTENNWEA

SPRING 16 17

Low Low Average

Average High Average

High

READING 18% 12% 25% 31% 14%

MATH 20% 13% 21% 25% 21%

KINDER Nat. %

READING 57%

MATH 55%

FIRSTGRADENWEA

SPRING 16 17

Low Low Average

Average High Average

High

READING 6% 14% 23% 17% 40%

MATH 9% 7% 26% 23% 36%

GRADE 1 Nat. %

READING 73%

MATH 74%

SECONDGRADENWEA

SPRING 16 17

Low Low Average

Average High Average

High

READING 9% 16% 13% 36% 26%

MATH 6% 20% 29% 30% 16%

GRADE 2 Nat. %

READING 71%

MATH 63%

Leadership Team

Representative from each grade level, Encore, and sped

Smart Goal: Focusing on Reading – Foundational

Skills – Building Wide

Professional Learning CommunitiesHorizontal by Grade Level, Encore, Sped

• Topics:

• Student academic needs

• Student non-academic needs

• RTI discussions/Intervention

• Progress Monitoring/Data

• Curriculum topics

• Parent updates

Professional Learning CommunitiesLiteracy

Focusing on our new Reading ProgramJOURNEYS

• R.I.S.E. – New ADE Initiative – 4 teachers involved this year with plans to expand.

RTIResponse to Intervention

Literacy & Math

Pathway2Success – Started Sept. 18. Focusing on Reading and Math.

• Meeting individual needs through researched-based programs and strategies.

Interventions include: Sonday System, Quick Reads, Small Group Guided Reading; Phonemic Awareness & Fluency Passages, Math Program, Plus, Navigator Math Intervention, FastMath for fluency every day.

These interventions are also utilized during the schoolday for students needing intervention.

RTIResponse to Intervention

During the Schoolday

• Kindergarten- 4 teachers – One Paraprofessional – Let’s, Play Learn an Orton Gillingham based program

• First Grade – One Paraprofessional – Sonday System or Barton Reading

RTIGrade 2, 3, & 4

• 2 Paraprofessionals assigned with student need in mind.

• Math & Literacy

Technology

• 1 to 1 Chrome Books K-4

• 3 Computer Lab with educational software

• FastMath is computer based

• IRead fully implemented in K-2

• Smartboards and document cameras in all classrooms

Parent InvolvementCoordinator-Whitney Thornton

• Little Paw Prints Newsletter twice monthly – Diana Boothe

• Fall Festival

• Parent Center

• Grandparent’s Day

• K-4 Family Night – Math and Literacy

• P.J. Literacy Day – Leah Wright

• Volunteer Reception in Spring

• Beach Day

• Movie Night

• Open House

• Parent Teacher Conferences (2)

• Book Fair – Leah Wright

• Veteran’s Day Program

• Facebook

WellnessCounselor – Phyllis Mayo

• Healthy Habits Presentation – Ark. Children’s Hospital

• Nurse stationed in elementary office area

• Guidance classes twice monthly

• Physical Education 40 Minutes per week

• Mobile Mammogram St. Vincent for staff

• Ocean Dental Screening for all students

• Flu Vaccinations offered district wide yearly

• Vision and Hearing Screenings yearly

• Health and Nutrition Education for all students

Bismarck Elementary School Thanks Our Community For Filling Our Buckets

• Any Questions???

BISMARCK MIDDLE

SCHOOL

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC

SEPTEMBER 25, 2017

NEW STAFF

o Angela Daniels- 5th Grade ELA

o Katie Smith-Johnson-Art & G/T

o Susie Cash-G/T

o Elizabeth Brown- Counselor

ATTENDANCE RATE

• BMS Attendance = 95.38%

• State Goal= 91.13%

• 310 students compared to 302 at end of year last year

Bismarck SHINES

MATH READING SCIENCE WRITING

5TH Grade (435) 26 76.3% 128 38.7% 91 51.3% 169 45.3%

6th Grade (344) 15 83.6% 154 46.3% 38 65.7% 69 71.6%

7th Grade (311) 25 67.5% 77 44.2% 35 59.7% 75 44.2%

8th Grade (311) 4 75.7% 22 67.10% 11 64.3% 11 68.6%

Overall

BSD Ranks 5th

BMS Ranks 18th out of 314

Bismarck SHINES

Bismarck

Magnet Cove

Malvern

Glen Rose

Centerpoint

Benton

Bryant

Ft. Lake

Mt. Pine

Cutter

Arkadelphia

Hot Springs

Lake Hamilton

Lakeside

Ouachita

Poyen

Math Reading Science Writing

5th

2 5 7 3

6th

1 8 2 3

7th

3 5 3 4

8th1 1 1 1

STEPS TO SUCCESS

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS

10Team

Building Leadership Team

Grade level Teams

SMART (Strategic, Measurable, Attainable, Results

oriented, Time bound) Goals for Building and Grade

Levels

Values, Mission, Vision

After school program-student focused

interventions, based on data

TESS Evaluations

“10” Team Characteristics

I can’t imagine doing my job without my team.

What we achieve collectively is greater than what I could achieve alone.

The sum is greater than the parts.

It’s not my students, but our students.

What we collaborate about impacts what I do in my classroom. It transforms me.

I would never come to a meeting unprepared, because we’ve agreed collectively—if I’m unprepared, I’m not the only one hurt.

We hold each other accountable

CONTINUING STEPS TO SUCCESS

NWEA Assessment

Lexile levels (Reading)

Shows growth

Use to evaluate After school program

ACT Aspire 5th-8th

PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

• OPEN HOUSE / PARENT ORIENTATION (August 10)• WEEKLY NEWSLETTER• PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCE(OCT. 26/ FEB 15)• C.A.P.S – SCHEDULING NIGHT (FEB)• SCHOOL WEBSITE• FACEBOOK PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT • PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR– KATHY

PASLEY• Muffins for Moms (September 13)• Donuts for Dads (February/March)• Coffee w/Coleman (September 27)

QUESTIONS

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING

A N N U A L R E P O R T T O T H E P U B L I C

S E P T E M B E R 2 5 , 2 0 1 7

BISMARCK HIGH SCHOOL

NEW YEAR

ENROLLMENT

316 STUDENTS

ENROLLMENT AT END OF LAST YEAR

304

INCREASE OF 12 STUDENTS

Vision/Mission

Our Vision:

“Equipping Students with skills so they can

succeed to their fullest potential in a changing world.”

Our Mission:

Bismarck High School:

“An educational community where students and teachers are committed to working collaboratively to honestly ensure every student reaches their fullest potential and goes competently in the direction of their dreams.”

EVERY STUDENT – EVERY DAY

ATTENDANCE, DROPOUT, AND GRADUATION RATE

Attendance = 94.3% - State Average = 94.4%

Dropout = 2.87% - State Average = 2.25%

Graduation = 94% - State Average = 87.02%

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

In 2017 BHS ranked 6th out 261 high schools in the state by SchoolDigger.

In 2016 we ranked #20 and #7 in 2015.

2017 - ACT – 11TH GRADE

STATE BENCHMARK SCORE

COLLEGE READINESS

English – 18

Math – 22

Reading – 22

Science – 23

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

HOW DID WE COMPARE

11th Grade Student Avg. State Avg. State Benchmark

English = 19.2 18.4 18

Math = 19.5 18.5 22

Reading = 19.1 18.9 22

Science = 19.7 18.9 23

Composite = 19.5 18.8

Percent of students scoring at Benchmark or better

Math = 30% English = 58%

Science = 20% Reading = 30%

66 – 11th Grade Students Tested

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th GRADE

English – Our percentage = 78.3 – National Avg. 61%

Math – Our percentage = 60.2% - National Avg. 36%

Science – Our percentage = 56.6% - National Avg. 32%

Reading – Our percentage = 63.9% - National Avg. 44%

Writing – Our percentage = 69.9% - National Avg. 44%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th Grade English = #1 – Ouachita = 88.1%#2 – Bismarck = 78.3% = #14 in the STATE!!! #3 – Glen Rose = 72.4%#4 – Bryant = 70.5%#5 – Lakeside = 69.7%#6 – Benton = 68.5%#7 – Dierks = 68.2%#8 – Fountain Lake = 66.4%#9 – Poyen = 65.9%#10 – Lake Hamilton = 65.1%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th Grade Reading = #1 – Bryant = 64.7% #2 – Bismarck = 63.9% = #9 in the STATE!!!#3 – Ouachita = 62.2%#4 – Benton = 52.4%#5 – Lake Hamilton = 50.2%#6 – Poyen = 50.0%#7 – Lakeside = 48.8%#8 – Dierks = 47.7%#9 – Glen Rose = 47.4%#10 – Arkadelphia = 44.8%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th Grade Writing = #1 – Bismarck = 69.9% = #16 in the STATE!!!#2 – Ouachita = 64.9%#3 – Lakeside = 64.8%#4 – Glen Rose = 57.9%#5 – Bryant = 57.8%#6 – Dierks = 56.8%#7 – Benton = 56.8%#8 – Fountain Lake = 55.2%#9 – Arkadelphia = 49.6%#10 – Magnet Cove = 46.5%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th Grade Math = #1 – Bismarck = 60.2% = #6 in the STATE!!!#2 – Benton = 48.5%#3 – Lakeside = 42.7%#4 – Poyen = 40.09%# 5 – Glen Rose = 40.8%# 6 – Fountain Lake = 39.7%#7 – Lake Hamilton = 35.6%#8 – Bryant = 34.7%#9 – Arkadelphia = 32.8%#10 – Ouachita = 27%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

9th Grade Science =#1 – Bismarck = 56.6% - #11 in the STATE!!! #2 – Glen Rose = 43.4%#3 – Ouachita = 43.2%#4 – Lakeside = 43.1%%#5 – Benton = 42.9%#6 – Bryant = 39.6%#7 – Lake Hamilton = 36.7%#8 - Dierks = 36.4%#9 – Fountain Lake = 36.8%#10 – Poyen = 34.1%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

10th Grade

English - Our percentage = 75.3% - National Avg. 62%

Math – Our percentage = 61.6 – National Avg. 32%

Science – Our percentage = 52.1 – National Avg. 34%

Reading – Our percentage = 52.1 – National Avg. = 38%

Writing – Our percentage = 64.9 – National Avg. = 52%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

10th Grade English

#1 – Benton = 76.8

#2 – Bismarck = 75.3 = #33 in the State!!!

#3 – Lakeside = 73.7

#4 – Fountain Lake = 72.6

#5 – Bryant = 70.1

#6 – Dierks = 69.4

#7 – Glen Rose = 68.9

#8 – Magnet Cove = 67.4

#9 – Lake Hamilton = 66.9

#10 – Jessieville = 60.0

HOW DID WE COMPARE

10th Grade Reading #1 - Bismarck = 52.1% = #27 in the State!!!#2 - Benton = 49.7%#3 – Lakeside = 46.3%#4 – Bryant = 44.7%#5 – Glen Rose = 44.6%#6 – Lake Hamilton = 43.6%#7 – Fountain Lake = 39.8%#8 – Dierks = 38.8%#9 – Arkadelphia = 32.6%#10 – Magnet Cove = 30.4%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

10th Grade Writing #1 – Glen Rose = 77% #2 – Magnet Cove = 71.7%#3 – Benton = 69.7%#4 – Lakeside = 69.6%#5 = Bismarck = 64.9% = #63 in the State!!!#6 – Lake Hamilton = 60.6%#7 – Bryant = 58.3%#8 – Arkadelphia = 56.5%#9 – Poyen = 56%#10 – Dierks = 55.1%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

• 10th Grade Science #1 – Bismarck = 52.1% = #21 in the State!!!#2 – Glen Rose = 48.6%#3 – Benton – 47.6%#4 – Lakeside – 43.7%#5 – Bryant = 38.9%#6 – Lake Hamilton = 34.4%#7 – Poyen = 34%#8 – Fountain Lake = 33.6%#9 – Jessieville = 32.3%#10 – Magnet Cove = 28.3%

HOW DID WE COMPARE

10th Grade Math= #1 – Bismarck = 61.6% = #3 in the State!!!!!!#2 – Benton = 44.4%#3 – Glen Rose = 37.8%#4 – Fountain Lake = 35.4%#5 – Lakeside = 31.9%#6 – Poyen = 30.0%#7 – Bryant = 28.5%#8 – Magnet Cove = 28.3#9 – Lake Hamilton = 24.8%#10 - Jessieville – 24.6%

CONTINUING STEPS TO SUCCESS

DEVELOP SMART (Strategic, Measurable, Attainable, Results Oriented,

Time Bound) GOALS FOR EVERY GRADE AND DEPARTMENT LEVEL.

FOCUS ON READING AND LEXILE LEVELS FOR EACH STUDENT

LEADERSHIP TEAM

GRADE LEVEL AND DEPARTMENTAL PLC MEETINGS

TESS EVALUATIONS

USING DATA FROM NWEA TESTING TO MEASURE STUDENT GROWTH IN

LITERACY AND MATH. WE ARE SCHEDULED TO ADMINISTER THIS TEST

TWO TIMES THIS SCHOOL YEAR. (SEPTEMBER and JANUARY )

WE WILL GIVE ACT ASPIRE INTERIM ASSESSMENTS TO 9TH AND 10TH

GRADE SCIENCE STUDENTS. THESE TEST WILL BE USED TO MEASURE

STUDENT GROWTH AND AREAS FOR REMEDIATION.

PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

OPEN HOUSE / PARENT ORIENTATION (Aug.10th) PARENT NIGHT FOR JUNIORS AND SENIORS

(September 26th) PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCE (OCT. 25th/

FEBRUARY 16th) ACT INFORMATION NIGHT (SPRING) C.A.P.S – SCHEDULING NIGHT (FEBRUARY) SCHOOL WEBSITE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR–CINDY

BUBULKA

QUESTIONS

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING