ANNUAL REPORT - Interstate Commission for Juveniles · ANNUAL REPORT Interstate ... it was an honor...

9
ANNUAL REPORT Interstate Commission For Juveniles Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities 2017

Transcript of ANNUAL REPORT - Interstate Commission for Juveniles · ANNUAL REPORT Interstate ... it was an honor...

ANNUAL REPORTInterstate Commission For Juveniles

Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

2017

2

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR

Jeff Cowger (KS) Commissioner, Trea-surer

Michael Lacy (WV) Commissioner, Vice Chair

Traci Marchand (NC) Commissioner, Chair

3

This year was a time of unprecedented change for the Interstate Commission for Juve-niles, with disaffiliation from the Council of State Governments (CSG), new leadership at the National Office and a long overdue upgrade of our data system. Amid transition, we continued to advance our mission and strategic initiatives by providing extensive train-ing and developing several new resources. Having been a part of the Commission for 14 years, it was an honor for me to serve as the Commission’s Chair during this critical time.

Due to rising costs of the CSG affiliation, ICJ withdrew from our long-standing relation-ship with CSG in FY17. After months of work to establish new accounts and absorb additional accounting and human resources tasks, the disaffiliation was finalized on De-cember 1, 2016. Consequently, ICJ realized substantial savings that can be invested in future projects that promote public safety, victims’ rights and juvenile accountability that is balanced with safe-guarding those juveniles.

In addition to the structural transformation, ICJ underwent a major change in leader-ship following the resignation of its first Executive Director Ashley Lippert in December 2016. Ashley made tremendous contributions to ICJ, including expanding membership to include all 50 states, DC, and the USVI; launching the Juvenile Interstate Data System (JIDS); and spearheading the disaffiliation from CSG. ICJ will be forever grateful for her vision and her leadership. We are glad for continued opportunities to partner with Ashley in her new role as Executive Director for the Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision.

Following an extensive national search, ICJ welcomed its new Executive Director in April 2017. MaryLee Underwood is an attorney with vast experience in public policy and administration in government and non-profit agencies. With a background in social work focused on children and abuse, she has been instrumental in shaping national and state policy regarding human trafficking, sexual assault, and victims’ rights. MaryLee hit the ground running during this transition period and is working diligently to advance ICJ’s Strategic Plan.

JIDS is ICJ’s national web-based system that facilitates the supervision, transfer, accep-tance, tracking, and return of juveniles from one state to another. In FY17, the first major upgrade of JIDS was performed, which was critical for replacing outdated software that was no longer supported. The upgrade incorporated a sleek, new design with a modern interface, and up-to-date icons.

First-class training and resources are essential for Compact implementation. ICJ devel-oped several new resources, including a concise “Bench Card” for judges and a Best Practice Guide regarding “Interstate Relocations with the Receiving State.” The Training Committee provided extensive training to address the varied needs of 8,651 criminal justice and child welfare professionals throughout the U.S.

Throughout a year that brought forth much change, one constant guided our way: ICJ’s commitment to cooperative action to promote child welfare and public safety. Our ac-complishments and our continued success are direct results of the dedication and hard work of ICJ professionals across the United States. Thank you for your support of our collaborative work during FY17 and beyond.

Sincerely,

Traci Marchand, ChairChair, Interstate Commission for Juveniles

Each year, the Commission’s Annual Business Meeting provides opportunities for Commis-sioners, Designees, and key allies to collabo-rate, network, and learn. In August 2016, the Annual Business Meeting was held in Boston, MA, where members were welcomed by Peter J. Forbes, Commissioner for the Common-wealth of Massachusetts.

Effective collaboration was a major theme for the 2016 ABM. The first day featured an in-teractive “Team Building and Collaboration” seminar led by Fahy Mullaney and a scenari-os-based training entitled, “It Takes a Village to Return a Juvenile.” The second day featured a collaborative panel discussion entitled “Estab-lishing and Utilizing the State Council,” as well as updates from standing committees and re-gional representatives.

ICJ also honored one of its greatest collabo-rators by presenting the Second Annual Lead-ership Award to Mia Pressley, South Carolina Commissioner and South Region Representa-tive. As noted in her nomination by Anne Con-nor, “Her expertise on all things ICJ is truly ad-mirable, but made even more so by her ability to share that wisdom in a way that makes the audience feel validated.”

The meeting concluded with elections, where a vote of confidence was made when officers from the previous year were re-elected to serve their second one-year terms. New region rep-resentatives were elected to serve two-year terms. Judge Chandlee Johnson-Kuhn (NCJF-CJ) administered the oath of office to the newly elected officers and region representatives.

Traci Marchand (NC) Commissioner, ChairMichael Lacy (WV) Commissioner, Vice ChairJeff Cowger (KS) Commissioner, TreasurerMichael Farmer (CA) Designee, Compliance Committee ChairDavid Barrett (ME) Commissioner, Finance Committee ChairShelley Hagan (WI) Commissioner, Information Technology Committee ChairJulie Hawkins (MO) Commissioner, Rules Committee ChairAnne Connor (NV) Commissioner, Training Committee ChairMaria Genca (CT) Designee, East Region RepresentativeNina Belli (OH) Commissioner, Midwest Region RepresentativeMia Pressley (SC) Commissioner, South Region RepresentativeJessica Eldredge (UT) Designee, West Region RepresentativeRick Masters, Legal CounselTrudy Gregorie, Victims Representative

ANNUAL MEETING PROMOTES COLLABORATION

For a complete list of the Commission’s committee rosters, go to www.juvenilecompact.org.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Mia Pressley Leadership Award 2016

FOUR STRATEGIC INITIATIVES FOR 2016–2019

Develop sustaining leadership via training and professional development

Using data to analyze and evaluate

performance and enforce/monitor

compliance.

Enhance communications and

collaboration to foster better out-

comes for juveniles

Utilize and promote the State Council

to increase national awareness/visibility

at the state level

4 5

GROWTH & INDEPENDENCEFor nearly a decade, the Commission enjoyed a strong and productive affiliation with the Coun-cil of State Governments. Unfortunately, affilia-tion-related costs rose steadily over the years until it was no longer fiscally responsible for the Commission to maintain its affiliation. In order to become an independent agency, ICJ estab-lished new accounts and procedures for bank-ing, insurance, human resources, and more. Since the disaffiliation was finalized on Dec- ember 1, 2016, ICJ realized over $90,000 in savings in fiscal year 2017 and will save an ad-ditional $150,000 in FY 2018. These funds can be used for future projects that promote ICJ’s mission and strategic initiatives. To ensure a smooth transition, $140,000 allocated to the long-term investment portfolio in FY17 was re-tained in the cash reserve account. In FY18, these funds will be transferred to the long-term investment fund as planned. The Juvenile Interstate Data System (JIDS) is

ICJ’s web-based system that facilitates the su-pervision, transfer, acceptance, tracking, and return of juveniles from one state to another. JIDS enables the 50 states, US Virgin Islands and District of Columbia to manage workflow and communications, as well as provide con-sistent service to juveniles.

In fiscal year 2017, the first major upgrade was performed on JIDS since its launch in 2012. The upgrade was critical because the previous version relied on outdated software (for which technical support was no longer available). The upgrade incorporated a sleek, new design with a modern interface and up-to-date icons. New features also enhanced security and optimized database indexing to improve system perfor-mance. To support successful use of JIDS, 18 Workflow Guides and the Sandbox Training En-vironment were also updated.

UPGRADED TECHNOLOGY

NATIONAL OFFICE STAFF

MaryLee Underwood Executive Director859.721.1060Jennifer AdkinsMIS Project Manager859.721.1063Emma Goode Administrative and Logistics Coordinator 859.721.1062LaVonne Rutten Training and Information Technology Coordinator | 859.721.1061

MaryLee Underwood, JD, joined the National Office as Executive Director in April 2017

NEW RESOURCES & PUBLICATIONS

n On Demand Training: It Takes a Village to Return a Juvenile

n Identified Elements in a Values Driven Script for Dispute Situations Provided by Member States

n Best Practice Guide: Intrastate Reloca-tions

n “About ICJ” Fact Sheetn Advisory Opinion 1–2016: Pre-adjudi-

cated Home Evaluation Requestsn Advisory Opinion 1–2017: Demanding/

Sending State’s Authority to Seek the Return of a Juvenile in Cases Where Charges are Pending in the Receiving/Holding State Under ICJ Rule 7-103

n Administrative Policy 01–2017: Code of Conduct

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ASSESSMENTS

In fiscal year 2017, the Commission launched its second large-scale per-formance measurement assessment. States were randomly assessed on pre- determined standards selected by the Compliance Committee related to:

n ICJ Rule 4-102: Sending and Receiving Referrals.

n ICJ Rule 4-103: Transfer of Supervision Procedures for Juvenile Sex Offenders

n ICJ Rule 5-102: Absconder Under ICJ Supervision

n JIDS Privacy Policy 5.0 – Expectations Regarding Information Gathered and Shared

n JIDS Privacy Policy 21.0 – Review of In-formation Regarding Retention

In fiscal year 2017, 75% of states were assessed with preliminary results reflecting high levels of compliance throughout the nation. Remaining states will be assessed early in FY 18.

7

TRAINING & COLLABORATION TO PROMOTE THE SPIRIT OF THE COMPACT

6

Training and other resources provided at 4 conferences:

n Mississippi Juvenile Justice Symposium in Biloxi, MI

n American Probation and Parole Asso-ciation 41st Annual Training Institute in Cleveland, OH

6,341 trained via On

Demand training

Did you know there are 9,765 registered website users and there were over 38,500 visits to the ICJ website in fiscal year 2017? Mobile access increased 29% since last fiscal year.

63 teleconference

meetings

1,136 trained via 42 live

WebEx

1,039 trained via ICJ State Offices

n American Probation and Parole Associa-tion Winter Training Institute in Reno, NV

n Coalition for Juvenile Justice Annual Conference in Washington, DC

American Probation and Parole Association (APPA)Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (AAICPC)Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators (CJCA)Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ)Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA)International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (ICAOS)National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG)National Children’s Advocacy Center (NCAC)National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ)National Governors Association (NGA)National Juvenile Detention Association (NJDA)National Runaway Safeline (NRS)National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA)National Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC) Justice Solutions

EX OFFICIO MEMBERS

MISSION STATEMENT:The Interstate Commission for Juveniles, the governing body of the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, through means of joint and cooperative action among the compacting states, preserves child welfare and promotes public safety interests of citizens, including victims of juvenile offend-ers, by providing enhanced accountability, enforcement, visibility, and communication in the return of juveniles who have left their state of residence without permission and in the cooperative supervision of delinquent juveniles who travel or relocate across state lines.

135 trained via TTA

requests

98

FINANCIAL OUTLOOKAs fiscal year 2018 approaches, the Commission’s financial outlook is very positive. The long-term investment portfolio continues to gener-ate an increased rate of return on the Commission’s funds since be-ginning the investment opportunity in 2014. The current balance in the portfolio is $807,044, with an average rate of return of 9.25% for FY17. Because of the prudent financial decisions made in FY17, the Com-mission finished the year 25% under budget.

Balance in cash reserve: $1,113,927Balance in long-term investments: $807,044FY17 Total Revenue: $1,218,359FY17 Total Expenses: $820,837

Statistics on juvenile movement gathered for this report were attained from the Juve-nile Interstate Data System (JIDS) for the period of July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017.

RETURN DATAIn fiscal year 2017, states returned 2,097 runaways, escapees, absconders and juve-niles charged delinquent. Non-voluntary returns are fairly evenly split between accused delinquents, runaways, and absconders, while absconders and runaways together make up over 80 percent of all voluntary returns.

11

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Runaway

Returns by Type – Fiscal Year 2017Total Returns = 2,097

Num

ber

785

52

808

661

66

263

56

Type of Return

Escapee Absconder AccusedDelinquent

Non Voluntary Returns = 189 9% increase from FY16

Voluntary Returns = 1,908 3% increase from FY16

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

Parole

Transfer of Supervision by Type – Fiscal Year 2017

Num

ber

704

4,848

105497

Type of Transfer

Probation

Sex Offenders = 602 5% decrease from FY16

Total Transfers = 5,552 7% decrease from FY16

10

GATHERING DATAA comprehensive and accurate review of returns and transfers is only possible if JIDS is used to document each juvenile case correctly.

TRANSFER DATAIn fiscal year 2017, 5,552 juveniles transferred supervision to another state. Probation transfers decreased 10 percent from FY16, for a total of 4,848 probation transfers sent/received. Parole transfers decreased 6 percent from FY16, with 704 cases referred.

Overall, 11 percent of all incoming parole or probation transfers were for sex-offenders, or 602 juveniles out of 5,552 total transfer requests submitted. Additionally, states sent 232 expedited transfer requests.

ANNUAL STATISTICS

7,842 travel permits

issued197

juveniles

Airport surveillance for

12

From

You

r Sta

te R

etur

ned

(Hom

e/D

eman

ding

Sta

te)

Fr

om O

ther

Sta

tes

Ret

urne

d (H

oldi

ng S

tate

)

STAT

E Ru

n Es

c Ab

sc

Acc

Tota

l To

tal

Tota

l Ru

n Es

c Ab

sc

Acc

Tota

l To

tal

Tota

l Ai

rpor

t

De

l

Vol

Non

Vol

Del

Vo

l N

on V

ol

Sup R

eq

M

et

Al

abam

a 5

0 5

2 12

12

0

8 0

14

4 26

23

3

0Al

aska

1

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 0

Arizo

na

17

1 5

4 27

26

1

23

0 14

11

48

45

3

11Ar

kans

as

19

0 10

0

29

26

3 20

0

7 4

31

28

3 0

Cal

iforn

ia

83

1 60

12

15

6 14

6 10

41

0

34

14

89

78

11

6C

olor

ado

23

0 13

9

45

42

3 34

0

22

3 59

52

7

12C

onne

ctic

ut

3 0

5 12

20

3

17

4 0

2 2

8 3

5 0

Dela

war

e 1

0 11

3

15

14

1 0

0 5

1 6

3 3

0Di

stric

t of

Col

umbi

a

6 0

41

2 49

46

3

2 1

35

29

67

62

5 0

Flor

ida

57

1 47

32

13

7 12

6 11

55

1

22

6 84

68

16

0

Geo

rgia

35

0

12

9 56

53

3

36

0 26

21

83

81

2

60H

awai

i 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

2 1

1 0

Idah

o 5

0 52

10

67

63

4

14

0 9

5 28

28

0

0Illi

nois

28

1

30

15

74

63

11

11

0 23

19

53

45

8

15In

dian

a 26

1

14

8 49

45

4

30

18

15

19

82

78

4 0

Iow

a 8

1 19

7

35

34

1 30

3

20

9 62

61

1

0Ka

nsas

16

0

54

3 73

72

1

25

0 10

3

38

33

5 0

Kent

ucky

14

26

8

4 52

52

0

11

4 25

6

46

44

2 0

Loui

sian

a 7

0 2

1 10

10

0

12

0 5

5 22

18

4

0M

aine

0

0 2

0 2

2 0

4 0

6 0

10

10

0 0

Mar

ylan

d

11

4 31

21

67

63

4

5 2

64

4 75

64

11

1

INTE

RST

ATE

MO

VEM

ENT

OF

JUV

ENIL

ES:

JU

LY 1

, 201

6 –

JUN

E 30

, 201

7 KE

Y Ru

n =

Runa

way

Es

c =

Esca

pee

Absc

= A

bsco

nder

Ac

c De

l = A

ccus

ed D

elin

quen

t Ai

rpor

t Sup

Req

Met

= A

irpor

t Sup

ervi

sion

Req

uest

Met

Vo

l = V

olun

tary

This

cha

rt de

tails

the

retu

rn o

f run

away

s, e

scap

ees,

abs

cond

ers,

and

juve

nile

s cha

rged

de

linqu

ent.

It in

clud

es th

e nu

mbe

r of j

uven

iles

sent

bac

k to

the

hom

e/de

man

ding

sta

te

(“Fro

m Y

our S

tate

Ret

urne

d”) a

long

with

the

num

ber o

f inc

omin

g ju

veni

les

whe

re th

e st

ate

liste

d is

the

hold

ing

stat

e (“F

rom

Oth

er S

tate

s Re

turn

ed”).

The

tota

l ret

urns

are

ca

tego

rized

as

eith

er v

olun

tary

or n

on-v

olun

tary

.

Mas

sach

uset

ts

18

0 15

1

34

20

14

4 0

5 9

18

6 12

0

Mic

higa

n 30

0

15

2 47

38

9

4 3

8 1

16

16

0 11

Min

neso

ta

17

4 23

12

56

56

0

10

0 13

12

35

30

5

2M

issi

ssip

pi

3 0

1 1

5 4

1 14

0

2 1

17

17

0 0

Mis

sour

i 16

1

10

5 32

29

3

24

0 64

9

97

92

5 2

Mon

tana

4

1 4

1 10

10

0

2 0

6 1

9 9

0 0

Neb

rask

a 24

0

36

6 66

61

5

14

0 22

5

41

38

3 0

Nev

ada

14

1 20

5

40

37

3 22

0

43

6 71

70

1

8N

ew H

amps

hire

7

0 2

0 9

9 0

5 0

2 0

7 6

1 0

New

Jer

sey

6 0

3 6

15

10

5 8

0 16

6

30

26

4 0

New

Mex

ico

15

0 13

3

31

31

0 15

0

7 3

25

23

2 0

New

Yor

k

28

0 12

0

40

39

1 10

1

17

5 33

20

13

2

Nor

th C

arol

ina

22

1 6

6 35

29

6

37

2 24

6

69

63

6 21

Nor

th D

akot

a 5

0 8

5 18

18

0

11

0 14

5

30

30

0 0

Ohi

o 24

0

30

14

68

63

5 36

9

23

9 77

74

3

0O

klah

oma

26

0 9

4 39

36

3

13

0 12

6

31

29

2 0

Ore

gon

13

0 34

5

52

47

5 32

1

48

6 87

79

8

1Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia

18

1 29

7

55

44

11

11

0 20

8

39

37

2 4

Rhod

e Is

land

4

0 2

1 7

4 3

1 0

2 0

3 3

0 0

Sout

h C

arol

ina

19

0 17

3

39

36

3 11

1

12

6 30

27

3

0So

uth

Dako

ta

4 3

13

1 21

21

0

10

5 8

0 23

21

2

0Te

nnes

see

32

2 15

10

59

57

2

40

0 6

10

56

54

2 0

Texa

s 40

0

24

18

82

72

10

78

0 25

2

105

101

4 25

Uta

h 19

0

10

1 30

29

1

24

0 17

6

47

45

2 8

Verm

ont

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0Vi

rgin

Isla

nds

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0Vi

rgin

ia

33

0 53

28

11

4 10

0 14

14

0

19

12

45

40

5 0

Was

hing

ton

24

1 32

7

64

61

3 11

0

51

7 69

66

3

8W

est V

irgin

ia

1 1

4 1

7 6

1 2

0 7

6 15

13

2

0W

isco

nsin

16

1

9 12

38

35

3

9 1

18

3 31

27

4

0W

yom

ing

3 0

4 0

7 6

1 13

1

5 2

21

21

0 0

Tota

l 85

1 53

87

4 31

9 20

97

1908

18

9 85

1 53

87

4 31

9 20

97

1908

18

9 19

7

1514

Par

ole

Supe

rvis

ion

Prob

atio

n Su

perv

isio

n

STAT

E In

c Se

x In

c O

ut

Sex

Out

Fa

il

Fail

Inc

Sex

Inc

Out

Se

x O

ut

Fail

Fail

Off

Term

Off

Term

Sv

sn S

vsn

Vio

O

ff Te

rm

O

ff Te

rm

Svsn

Svs

n Vi

o

Alab

ama

26

1 23

6

3 5

0 0

101

8 89

62

3

62

0 0

Alas

ka

2 1

1 0

0 0

0 0

11

2 11

4

0 7

0 0

Arizo

na

21

2 19

4

1 7

0 0

148

9 15

4 85

7

106

0 0

Arka

nsas

9

0 8

23

2 26

0

0 65

7

67

62

5 74

0

0C

alifo

rnia

37

6

35

24

7 21

0

0 25

4 28

26

8 36

4 23

38

0 3

1C

olor

ado

8 2

8 17

0

28

0 0

87

6 98

18

3 19

17

2 2

0C

onne

ctic

ut

8 0

5 9

0 9

0 0

22

1 23

13

1

14

1 0

Dela

war

e 5

0 3

11

0 13

0

0 71

3

52

58

4 59

0

0Di

stric

t of

Col

umbi

a

26

3 22

17

1

21

0 0

53

1 82

37

3

35

0 0

Flor

ida

44

9 41

56

9

47

0 0

247

24

259

357

30

330

3 2

Geo

rgia

51

8

40

71

3 64

3

3 24

6 21

22

8 23

6 15

23

0 0

0H

awai

i 1

0 1

0 0

0 0

0 6

1 10

6

0 7

1 1

Idah

o 7

4 5

10

1 11

0

0 52

8

56

125

14

109

5 5

Illino

is

22

4 19

58

2

34

1 1

120

12

137

356

22

326

2 2

Indi

ana

24

4 26

5

3 1

0 0

132

10

110

86

13

87

0 0

Iow

a 11

1

7 1

0 1

0 0

101

12

91

41

13

33

0 0

Kans

as

13

2 9

23

3 15

0

0 57

5

53

92

19

105

1 1

Kent

ucky

15

3

12

16

7 12

1

1 96

11

78

23

1

21

0 0

Loui

sian

a 11

4

16

4 1

8 0

0 85

14

83

58

4

47

0 0

Mai

ne

0 0

3 0

0 1

0 0

12

1 11

5

0 6

0 0

Mar

ylan

d

25

1 29

54

9

52

0 0

149

17

135

145

18

157

2 2

Mas

sach

uset

ts

3 0

1 21

0

17

0 0

42

3 41

31

0

35

0 0

INTE

RST

ATE

MO

VEM

ENT

OF

JUV

ENIL

ES:

JU

LY 1

, 201

6 –

JUN

E 30

, 201

7

KEY

Inc

= In

com

ing

Sex

Off

= Se

x O

ffend

erIn

c Te

rm =

Inco

min

g Te

rmin

ated

Out

= O

utgo

ing

Out

Ter

m =

Out

goin

g Te

rmin

ated

Faile

d Sp

rvsn

= R

etur

n fo

r Fai

led

Supe

rvis

ion,

as

hom

e/se

ndin

g st

ate

Fail

Sprv

sn V

io =

Ret

urne

d fo

r Fai

led

Supe

rvis

ion

due

to v

iola

tion,

a

s ho

me/

send

ing

stat

e

This

char

t illu

stra

tes

the

mov

emen

t of j

uven

iles

unde

r sup

ervis

ion.

Thi

s in

clud

es

the

num

ber

of c

ases

term

inat

ed, w

heth

er it

was

a s

ex-o

ffend

er re

late

d ca

se,

faile

d su

perv

ision

s, a

nd fa

iled

supe

rvisi

ons

due

to v

iola

tions

.

Mic

higa

n 9

1 15

0

0 0

0 0

98

23

105

26

6 22

2

2M

inne

sota

12

1

9 1

0 0

0 0

112

9 90

76

9

99

4 4

Mis

siss

ippi

9

2 9

1 0

5 0

0 61

5

65

32

1 34

0

0M

isso

uri

19

2 14

35

4

32

0 0

162

18

159

26

2 22

0

0M

onta

na

4 1

5 9

2 5

0 0

39

4 28

10

2

15

2 2

Neb

rask

a 4

1 4

0 0

0 0

0 41

8

33

89

6 10

2 0

0N

evad

a 18

3

13

25

0 24

2

2 12

7 11

12

9 15

0 10

17

5 2

1N

ew H

amps

hire

4

0 3

5 0

1 0

0 9

3 11

14

2

14

0 0

New

Jer

sey

4 1

2 15

0

7 0

0 88

6

84

172

24

172

1 1

New

Mex

ico

3 3

5 5

0 10

0

0 40

3

60

35

1 48

2

1N

ew Y

ork

10

1 12

14

1

6 0

0 16

4 16

17

2 61

3

55

0 0

Nor

th C

arol

ina

21

4 21

0

0 8

0 0

182

18

177

77

7 82

1

1N

orth

Dak

ota

4 2

5 13

2

9 0

0 32

2

37

49

6 38

0

0O

hio

19

2 13

11

6

19

1 0

107

11

119

90

11

94

0 0

Okl

ahom

a 12

0

14

2 0

1 0

0 81

13

71

85

11

59

0

0O

rego

n 15

4

13

14

2 20

0

0 11

2 17

12

0 97

19

67

0

0Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia

20

0 27

2

0 1

0 0

145

15

140

307

31

249

2 1

Rhod

e Is

land

4

0 3

0 0

0 0

0 11

1

8 19

0

16

0 0

Sout

h C

arol

ina

16

1 20

6

2 5

1 0

96

9 10

6 83

8

89

2 2

Sout

h Da

kota

3

2 6

6 2

13

0 0

33

3 31

11

0

13

0 0

Tenn

esse

e 24

7

18

28

5 33

0

0 12

4 10

13

9 10

2 3

105

0 0

Texa

s 37

5

45

15

4 15

0

0 30

3 27

31

0 28

8 51

26

5 2

2U

tah

7 2

5 5

0 4

0 0

62

9 51

43

9

59

1 1

Verm

ont

1 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

8 0

8 7

2 3

0 0

Virg

in Is

land

s 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

5 0

1 0

0Vi

rgin

ia

20

2 21

24

5

24

0 0

116

17

119

130

17

165

0 0

Was

hing

ton

14

3 9

24

16

19

3 1

156

19

122

161

21

156

4 3

Wes

t Virg

inia

9

0 10

0

0 0

0 0

60

3 43

11

1

18

0 0

Wis

cons

in

11

0 10

14

2

13

0 0

95

10

86

130

13

129

0 0

Wyo

min

g

2 0

3 0

0 0

0 0

26

3 39

33

7

30

1 1

TOTA

L 70

4 10

5 66

7 70

4 10

5 66

7 12

8

4848

49

7 47

98

4848

49

7 47

98

46

36

www.juvenilecompact.org

836 Euclid Avenue, Suite 322Lexington, KY 40502

859–721–1062

VISION STATEMENT:The Interstate Commission for Juveniles will promote public safety, victims’ rights, and juvenile accountability that is balanced with safeguarding those juveniles.