ANNUAL REPORT CARD 2017-2018 - Gallaudet University Center... · 2019-03-19 · Report Card...

ANNUAL REPORT CARD

2017-2018

Table of Contents

Letter from the Chief Academic Officer Curriculum & Assessment ........................................................................................ i

Report Card Information ........................................................................................................................................................ iii

Laurent Clerc National Education Center ............................................................................................................................... 1

Enrollment and Graduation Information ............................................................................................................................ 1

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Overall Performance ................................................................................ 2

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Performance on Academic and Non-Academic Measures ...................... 3

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Overall Performance ...................................................................................... 4

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Academic and Non-Academic Measures ....................................................... 5

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Academic Achievement ........................................................................... 6

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Academic Achievement .................................................................................. 6

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of Academic Achievement Data .................................. 7

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Academic Achievement Data ........................................ 8

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) ELA Performance Data ........................................................................................................................................................ 9

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) ELA Performance Data ............. 9

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) ELA Performance Data ............................................................................................................................................................. 10

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) ELA Performance Data ................... 10

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: PARCC Math Performance Data ................................................................. 11

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: MSAA Math Performance Data .................................................................. 11

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: PARCC Math Performance Data ......................................................................... 12

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: MSAA Math Performance Data .......................................................................... 12

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Maryland Integrated Assessment (MISA) Performance Data .................... 13

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: High School Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (HSA MISA) Performance Data ................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Academic Progress ................................................................................. 14

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of Academic Growth Data ......................................... 15

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Graduation Rate ........................................................................................... 16

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Graduation Data ......................................................... 17

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Readiness for Post-Secondary Success ........................................................ 18

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Post-Secondary Enrollment Rates ............................................................ 18

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Readiness for Post-Secondary Success ....................... 19

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): School Quality or Student Success ......................................................... 20

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): School Quality or Student Success ............................................................... 20

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of School Quality and Student Success Data ............ 21

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of School Quality and Student Success Data ................... 22

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Progress Toward Annual Long-Term Measurement Objectives ............ 23

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Progress Toward Annual Long-Term Measurement Objectives .................. 24

Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) Data ............................................................................................................................... 25

Educator Qualifications Data ................................................................................................................................................ 26

Plan for Calculating Per Pupil Expenditures for the Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center ................................... 26

i Version for posting December 19, 2018

Letter from the Chief Academic Officer Curriculum & Assessment

Dear families,

The Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center at Gallaudet University is required by the 2008 Education of the Deaf Act (EDA) to implement systems of standards, assessments, and accountability pursuant to those required of states under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015.

The reauthorized EDA, inclusive of ESSA amendments, states that the Clerc Center’s Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (KDES) and the Model Secondary School for the Deaf (MSSD) shall adopt and implement challenging academic content standards and assessments and annually use those assessments to determine how successful KDES and MSSD have been in including all students in standard-based education and how well students are achieving standards.

ESSA provides states with more autonomy in developing new approaches to accountability for students’ academic performance, but states must have accountability systems in place to ensure that all students are provided an opportunity for a high-quality education. As such, the Clerc Center partners with the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) to implement their standards, assessment, and accountability system and to meet the regulations defined by ESSA and EDA.

In spring 2018, students at the Clerc Center participated in the following assessments:

Grade

Assessment 3 4 5 6 7 8 High School*

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) ELA and mathematics

X X X X X X X

Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) for ELA and mathematics

X X X X X X X

Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (MISA)

X X X

Alternate Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (Alt-MISA)

X X X

*Students are assessed once in high school in ELA (PARCC ELA10/MSAA), mathematics (PARCC Algebra 1/MSAA), and science (MISA/Alt-MISA). Students take the MISA/Alt-MISA after the completion of high school Biology. High school students are testing in grade 10 and are able to re-test in grades 11 and 12.

Each of these assessments measure student achievement of grade-level standards. These standards represent what students should know and be able to do by the end of each grade.

ii Version for posting December 19, 2018

This school report card provides assessment and accountability data according to the following indicators, as established through MSDE’s ESSA plan.

Elementary/Middle School (ES/MS) High School (HS)

Academic Achievement • Achievement composite: 20% • Achievement composite: 30%

Other Academic • Academic growth: 25%

• Credit for completion of a well-rounded curriculum: 10%

• N/A

Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency (ELP)

• Progress toward language proficiency: 10%

• Progress toward ELP: 10%

Graduation Rate • N/A • Graduation composite: 15%

School Quality or Student Success (SQSS)

• Chronic absenteeism: 15%

• School climate: 10%

• Access to a well-rounded curriculum: 10%

• Chronic absenteeism: 15%

• School Climate: 10%

• Access to a well-rounded curriculum: 10%

Readiness for Post-secondary Success • N/A • On-track in 9th grade: 5%

• Readiness for post-secondary success: 5%

For questions related to this report card, please contact Marianne Belsky, Chief Academic Officer. She can be reached at:

Email: [email protected] Videophone: 202-558-4629

Thank you,

Marianne Belsky Chief Academic Officer Curriculum & Assessment

iii Version for posting December 19, 2018

Report Card Information1 What does my school rating mean?

Overall school star designations are determined by a combination of academic and school quality indicators that are used to differentiate and identify schools to ensure that all schools are meeting the needs of all students. Academic indicators are used to determine 65 percent of the possible points, while the school quality and student success indicator determines 35 percent of the possible points. Possible points vary by school and year, however school ratings are based on the total earned points percent. Percentile ranks of each school is reported and is based on the grades in the school (Elementary, Middle and/or High school).

How are star ratings determined?

STAR RATING STAR RATING

5 stars when a school has at least 75% of total earned points percent

2 stars when a school has at least 30% but less than 45% of total earned points percent


1 star when a school has less than 30% of total earned points percent


Academic Achievement Academic Progress

The Academic Achievement indicator measures the performance of students in a school who demonstrated proficient skills and knowledge in a student's academic program. As measured by MCAP, this indicator is comprised of student achievement measures in math and English Language Arts. School points are determined by the percentage of students achieving proficiency, and the school's average performance level.

The Academic Progress indicator measures the performance of students in a school who show meaningful relative growth in math and English Language Arts (Academic Growth) and who demonstrate proficient skills and knowledge in Science and Social Studies, and who pass transitional grade course requirements (Credit for Completion of a Well-Rounded Curriculum). School points are determined for Academic Growth by student growth percentiles, for science and social studies by the percentage of students achieving proficiency, and for credit for completion of a well-rounded curriculum by the percentage of students passing 5th or 8th grade coursework requirements.

Graduation Rate Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency

The Graduation Rate indicator measures the performance of students in a school who graduate with a regular high school diploma. This Indicator is comprised of two measures of a cohort of ninth grade students graduating within four years or five years respectively.

The Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency indicator measures the performance of students in a school who show meaningful growth toward or have attained English language proficiency as measured by the MCAP test for English language learners. The goal for English language learner students Is to attain English language proficiency within six years. School points are determined by the percentage of English Learners achieving or making progress towards attaining proficiency.

Readiness for Post-Secondary Success School Quality and Student Success

The Readiness for Postsecondary Success indicator measures the performance of students in a school who are on track for graduation and those students who have completed high school coursework along with a rigorous or comprehensive co-curricular standard. School points are comprised of a school’s percentage of 9th grade students earning at least four credits in required coursework and percentage of graduating or exiting students achieving a rigorous or comprehensive co-curricular standard.

The School Quality and Student Success indicator measures the performance of students in a school who regularly attend school, report positive perceptions of their school, and have actively engaged in rigorous and/or co-curricular academic coursework outside of traditional English Language Arts and Mathematics (elementary) or Science and Social Studies (middle). School points are comprised of a school's percentage of not chronically absent students, school survey results, and measures of access to a well-rounded curriculum.

1 This table was adopted from Maryland’s published report cards accessed from http://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/.

1 Version for posting December 19, 2018

Laurent Clerc National Education Center

Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center 800 Florida Ave NE Grades: K-12 Washington, D.C. 20002

Enrollment and Graduation Information

Number of Students Enrolled2

2016/17 2017/18

ECE 47 41

Grade 1 4 5

Grade 2 7 6

Grade 3 9 7

Grade 4 7 6

Grade 5 12 7

Grade 6 7 13

Grade 7 9 8

Grade 8 9 10

Grade 9 30 27

Grade 10 43 39

Grade 11 43 56

Grade 12 50 52

Total 277 277

2 Clerc Center enrollment data are based on the September 15, 2016 and the September 15, 2017 enrollment counts. 3 The four-year graduation rate is the percent of a schools’ cohort of first-time grade 9 students in a particular school year, who graduate within four years. Thirty-seven students of the sixty students in the cohort class graduated by the spring of 2018. Students who received certificates of completion are not counted as graduates; they remained in the calculation as did students who withdrew without detail. 4 Low income rates are calculated based on total number of parent survey respondents indicating family eligibility for government assistance out of the total number of tested students. Source: Parent Survey with a 36% return rate in KDES on parent survey questions about family eligibility for government assistance. Parent Survey with a 23% return rate in MSSD on parent survey questions about family eligibility for government assistance. 5 Chronic absenteeism is defined as the number of students absent 10% or more school days during the school year in membership at least 10 days. To calculate the percentage of days absent, the number of days absent was divided by the total number of school days as reported by the Clerc Center.

Graduation Rates3

2016/17 2017/18

MSSD 89% 69%

Low Income4

2016/17 2017/18

KDES 31% 22%

MSSD 95% 81%

Attendance Rates5

2016/17 2017/18

KDES 95% 82%

MSSD N/A 81%


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Overall Performance

Overall school performance is determined by a combination of academic and school quality indicators. The total earned points percent is provided as well as a percentile rank and a star designation.

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO OVERALL?

INDICATOR POSSIBLE POINTS

EARNED POINTS

ANNUAL TARGET6

Academic Achievement7 20 5.75

Academic Progress8 30 17.71 N/A Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency9

10 0.00 N/A

School Quality and Student Success10 25 13.03 N/A

36.49

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

STAR RATING

TOTAL EARNED POINTS 36.49 =

42.92%

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 85.00 TOTAL EARNED PERCENT

6 Maryland has yet to indicate annual targets for all measures therefore N/A was used to denote this where applicable. For more detailed information on the annual targets see page 26. 7 The annual targets and interim progress targets for academic achievement data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx 8 Five points were removed from the Academic Progress indicator as the Maryland Integrated Science Assessment results were not included in Maryland’s calculations for year one. 9 The Clerc Center does not collect data on English Language Learners. 10 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Performance on Academic and Non-Academic Measures11

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO ON ACADEMIC MEASURES?12

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO ON NON-ACADEMIC MEASURES?13

11 The annual targets and interim progress targets for academic achievement data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx For more detailed information on the annual targets see page 26. 12 Five points were removed from the Academic Progress indicator as the Maryland Integrated Science Assessment results were not included in Maryland’s calculations for year one. 13 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.

0 Points 50 Points 32.5

ALL TARGET(S) MET

ACADEMIC MEASURES ARE A COMBINATION OF:

X NO

Academic achievement

Academic progress

IMPROVEMENT Progress in achieving ELP

N/A


ALL TARGET(S) MET

SCHOOL QUALITY AND STUDENT SUCCESS MEASURES ARE A COMBINATION OF:

N/A Percent of students not chronically absent

School survey

IMPROVEMENT Percent of students with access to a well-rounded curriculum

N/A


Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Overall Performance

INDICATOR POSSIBLE POINTS

EARNED POINTS

ANNUAL TARGET14

Academic Achievement15 30 6.46

Graduation Rate16 15 11.46

Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency17

10 0.00 N/A

Readiness for Post-Secondary Success 10 4.54 N/A

School Quality and Student Success 2518 9.92 N/A

32.38

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

STAR

RATING

TOTAL EARNED POINTS 32.38 =

35.98%

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 90.00 TOTAL EARNED PERCENT

14 Maryland has yet to indicate annual targets for all measures therefore N/A was used to denote this where applicable. For more detailed information on the annual targets see page 27. 15 The annual targets and interim progress targets for academic achievement data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx 16 The five-year cohort graduation goal was set at 95% for all students and subgroups (until 2020). 17 The Clerc Center does not collect data on English Language Learners. 18 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO OVERALL?

Overall school performance is determined by a combination of academic and school quality indicators. The total earned points percent is provided as well as a percentile rank and a star designation.


Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Academic and Non-Academic Measures19

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO ON ACADEMIC MEASURES?

HOW DID MY SCHOOL DO ON NON-ACADEMIC MEASURES?20

19 The annual targets and interim progress targets for academic achievement data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx For more detailed information on the annual targets see page 27. 20 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.


ALL TARGET(S) MET

ACADEMIC MEASURES ARE A COMBINATION OF:

X NO

Academic achievement

Graduation rate

IMPROVEMENT Readiness for post-secondary success

N/A Progress in achieving ELP


ALL TARGET(S) MET

SCHOOL QUALITY AND STUDENT SUCCESS MEASURES ARE A COMBINATION OF:

N/A Percent of students not chronically absent

School survey

IMPROVEMENT Percent of students with access to a well-rounded curriculum

N/A


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Academic Achievement

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT HOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE TESTS? The academic achievement indicator is a combination of the percent of students scoring “proficient” or higher on state tests in Math and English language arts, and the average performance level of students on state tests.

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Academic Achievement

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT HOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE TESTS? The academic achievement indicator is a combination of the percent of students scoring “proficient” or higher on state tests in Math and English language arts, and the average performance level of students on state tests.

MEASURE RESULTS EARNED POINTS

Percent proficient in mathematics 20.4% 1.02 out of 5

Percent proficient in English language arts

16.7% 0.83 out of 5

Average performance level mathematics

2.1 2.1 out of 5

Average performance level English language arts

1.8 1.8 out of 5

5.75 EARNED POINTS

0 Points 20 Points 10


Percent proficient in mathematics 9.2% 0.69 out of 7.5

Percent proficient in English language arts

6.9% 0.52 out of 7.5

Performance index in mathematics

1.9 2.85 out of 7.5

Performance index in English language arts

1.6 2.40 out of 7.5

6.46 EARNED POINTS



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of Academic Achievement Data21

21 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 22 The total percent is the number of earned points divided by the number of possible points.

MEASURES INDICATOR Participation in PARCC and

MSAA

Points Earned for ELA

Proficiency (5 points)

Points Earned for Math

Proficiency (5 points)

Average Performance

Level ELA (5 points)

Average Performance Level Math (5 points)

Academic Composite

Total (20 points)

Percent22

POINTS EARNED

All students 54 0.83 1.02 2.10 1.80 5.75 28.8

The numbers above represent the total points earned.

The following numbers represent the points earned by each

subgroup and will add up to the total points earned.


subgroup and will not add up to the total points earned.

The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and will

not add up to the total points earned.

Asian -- 0.19 0.09 1.80 2.00 4.08 20.4

Non -- 0.65 0.93 1.80 2.00 5.38 26.9

Black/African American

18 0.28 0.37 1.60 1.90 4.15 20.8

Non 36 0.56 0.65 1.90 2.10 5.21 26.1

Hispanic/Latino -- 0.09 N/A 1.70 1.50 3.29 16.5

Non -- 0.74 1.02 1.90 2.10 5.76 28.8

White 22 0.28 0.56 2.10 2.40 5.34 26.7

Non 32 0.56 0.46 1.60 1.80 4.42 22.1

Two or More Races

-- N/A N/A 3.00 1.00 4.00 20.0

Non -- 0.83 1.02 1.80 2.10 5.75 28.8

Not Indicated -- 0.09 N/A 1.30 1.40 2.79 14.0

Non -- 0.74 1.02 1.90 2.10 5.76 28.8

Students with Disabilities

54 0.83 1.02 2.10 1.80 5.75 28.8

Non N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Economically Disadvantaged

-- 0.28 0.19 2.00 2.30 4.77 23.9

Non -- 0.28 0.37 2.50 2.80 5.95 29.8

Not Indicated -- 0.28 0.46 1.60 1.80 4.14 20.7

No students of “American Indian or Alaska Native” and “Native Hawaiian or Other Origin” attend the Kendall Demonstration Elementary School in 2017-18.

The Clerc Center does not collect data for “English Language Learners”.


Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Academic Achievement Data23

23 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 24 The total percent is the number of earned points divided by the number of possible points.

MEASURES INDICATOR School

Enrollment Points Earned for ELA Proficiency

(7.5 points)


Proficiency (7.5 points)

Performance Index ELA

(7.5 points)

Performance Index Math (7.5 points)

Academic Composite

Total (30 points)

Percent24

POINTS EARNED

All students 174 0.52 0.69 2.40 2.85 6.46 21.5


The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and

will add up to the total points earned.


subgroup and will not add up to the total points earned.

The following numbers represent the points earned

by each subgroup and will not add up to the total points

earned.

American Indian or Alaskan Native

-- 0.07 0.07 2.63 3.00 5.77 19.2

Non -- 0.45 0.62 2.46 2.91 6.44 21.5

Asian 15 0.07 N/A 2.25 3.17 5.49 18.3

Non 159 0.45 0.69 2.50 2.90 6.54 21.8


44 N/A 0.07 1.89 2.44 4.40 14.7

Non 130 0.52 0.62 2.64 3.07 6.85 22.8

Hispanic/Latino 33 N/A N/A 2.16 2.16 4.32 14.4

Non 141 0.52 0.69 2.55 2.98 6.74 22.5

Native Hawaiian or Other Origin

-- N/A N/A 3.00 3.00 6.00 20.0

Non -- 0.52 0.69 2.47 2.91 6.59 22.0

White 92 0.26 0.41 2.67 3.15 6.49 21.6

Non 82 0.26 0.28 2.29 2.71 5.54 18.5

Two or More Races

11 0.13 0.14 3.17 3.00 6.44 21.5

Non 163 0.39 0.55 2.41 2.91 6.26 20.9

Not Indicated -- N/A N/A 2.43 2.67 5.10 17.0

Non -- 0.52 0.69 2.47 2.94 6.62 22.1


174 0.52 0.69 2.40 2.85 6.46 21.5



-- 0.07 0.14 2.34 3.14 5.69 19.0

Non -- 0.13 0.28 4.07 4.68 9.16 30.5

Not Indicated 140 0.32 0.28 2.37 2.68 5.65 18.8



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) ELA Performance Data25

Participation Rate Performance

Students Assessed

Students Not

Assessed

Number of Valid Scores

Average Scale Score

Level 1 Did Not Yet

Meet Expectation

s

Level 2 Partially Met Expectations

Level 3 Approached Expectations

Level 4 Met

Expectations

Level 5 Exceeded

Expectations

n % n % n % n % n %

ALL STUDENTS 47 0 47 700.7 28 59.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

GENDER

Female 20 0 20 709.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male 23 0 23 696.7 15 31.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students where “no gender” was indicated is too small to report (n<10).

RACE/ETHNICITY

Black or African-American

14 0 14 690.3 10 21.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

White 21 0 21 715.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students “Asian”, “Hispanic or Latino”, “identify as Two or more races”, and where no race was indicated are too small to report (n<10). No students of “American Indian or Alaska Native” or “Native Hawaiian or Other Origin” attend the Kendall

Demonstration Elementary School.

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTGED

Yes 10 0 10 704.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Not Indicated 30 0 30 693.4 20 43.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students who identify as “not economically disadvantaged” are too small to report (n<10).

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

IEP - Yes 47 0 47 700.7 28 59.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The Clerc Center does not collect data for the following subgroups: “English Language Learners”, “Migrant Students”, “Foster Students”, “Homeless Students”, or “Students with a Parent in the Military”.

Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) ELA Performance Data

The number of students assessed by MSAA is too small to report (n<10).

25 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available.


Model Secondary School for the Deaf: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) ELA Performance Data26


Students Assessed

Students Not

Assessed


Average Scale Score

Level 1 Did Not Yet

Meet Expectations



Level 4 Met

Expectations

Level 5 Exceeded

Expectations

n % n % n % n % n %

ALL STUDENTS 114 0 114 696.3 69 60.5 25 21.9 13 11.4 -- -- -- --

GENDER

Female 58 0 58 697.6 34 29.8 14 12.3 -- -- -- -- -- --

Male 51 0 51 695.4 32 28.1 10 8.8 -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students where “no gender” was indicated is too small to report (n<10). 4 0 4

692 3

6.4 1

2.1 0 0 0 0 0

0

RACE/ETHNICITY

Asian 12 0 12 692.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


26 0 26 684.5 22 19.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Hispanic or Latino 25 0 25 691.4 16 14.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

White 55 0 55 701.6 28 24.6 15 13.2 -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students of “American Indian or Alaska Native”, “Native Hawaiian or Other Origin”, “identify as Two or more races”, and where no race was indicated are too small to report (n<10).


Yes 23 0 23 697.3 15 13.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Not Indicated 84 0 84 696.6 54 47.4 17 14.9 -- -- -- -- -- --

The numbers of students who identify as “not economically disadvantaged” are too small to report (n<10).


IEP - Yes 114 0 114 696.3 69 60.5 25 21.9 13 11.4 -- -- -- --

Clerc Center does not collect data for the following subgroups: “English Language Learners”, “Migrant Students”, “Foster Students”, “Homeless Students”, or “Students with a Parent in the Military”.

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) ELA Performance Data

The number of students assessed by the MSAA is too small to report (n<10).



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: PARCC Math Performance Data27

Participations Rate Performance

Students Assessed

Students Not

Assessed


Average Scale Score

Level 1 Did Not Yet

Meet Expectations



Level 4 Met

Expectations

Level 5 Exceeded

Expectations

n % n % n % n % n %

ALL STUDENTS 47 0 47 706.1 24 51.1 10 21.3 -- -- -- -- -- --

GENDER

Female 20 0 20 706.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male 23 0 23 708.7 13 27.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students where “no gender” was indicated is too small to report (n<10). 4 0 4

692 3

6.4 1

2.1 0 0 0 0 0 0

RACE/ETHNICITY


14 0 14 693.1 10 21.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

White 21 0 21 724.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students “Asian”, “Hispanic or Latino”, “identify as Two or more races”, and where “no race” was indicated are too small to report (n<10). No students of “American Indian or Alaska Native” or “Native Hawaiian or Other Origin” attend the Kendall

Demonstration Elementary School.


Yes 10 0 10 706.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Not Indicated 30 0 30 702.0 18 38.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students who identify as “not economically disadvantaged” are too small to report (n<10).


IEP - Yes 47 0 47 706.1 24 51.1 10 21.3 -- -- -- -- -- --


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: MSAA Math Performance Data

The number of students assessed by MSAA is too small to report (n<10).



Model Secondary School for the Deaf: PARCC Math Performance Data28


Students Assessed

Students Not

Assessed


Average Scale Score

Level 1 Did Not Yet

Meet Expectations



Level 4 Met

Expectations

Level 5 Exceeded

Expectations

n % n % n % n % n %

ALL STUDENTS 107 0 107 709.5 43 40.2 38 35.4 17 15.9 -- -- -- --

GENDER Female 53 0 53 705.5 24 22.4 16 15.0 12 11.2 -- -- -- --

Male 48 0 48 713.5 18 16.8 18 16.8 -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students where no gender was indicated is too small to report (n<10). 4 0 4

692 3

6.4 1

2.1 0 0 0 0 0

0

RACE/ETHNICITY


27 0 27 701.1 15 14.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Hispanic or Latino 23 0 23 702.1 10 9.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

White 50 0 50 713.7 17 15.9 17 15.9 10 9.3 -- -- -- --

The number of students of “American Indian or Alaska Native”, “Asian”, “Native Hawaiian or Other Origin”, “identify as Two or more races”, and where no race was indicated are too small to report (n<10).


Yes 21 0 21 709.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Not Indicated 78 0 78 718.7 35 32.7 30 28.0 10 9.4 -- -- -- --

The numbers of students who identify as “not economically disadvantaged” are too small to report (n<10).


IEP - Yes 107 0 107 709.5 43 40.2 38 35.4 17 15.9 -- -- -- --

Clerc Center does not collect data for the following subgroups: “English Language Learners”, “Migrant Students”, “Foster Students”, “Homeless Students”, or “Students with a Parent in the Military”.

Model Secondary School for the Deaf: MSAA Math Performance Data The number of students assessed by the MSAA is too small to report (n<10).



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School: Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (MISA) Performance Data29,30

Participations Rate Performance

Students Assessed

Students Not Assessed


Average Scale Score



Level 4 Met

Expectations

Level 5 Exceed

Expectations

n % n % n % n %

ALL STUDENTS 15 0 15 733.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

GENDER

Male 10 0 10 731.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The number of students “Female” or where “no gender” was indicated are too small to report (n<10).

RACE/ETHNICITY

The number of students “Asian”, “Black or African American”, “Hispanic or Latino”, “identify as Two or more races”, “White”, and where no race was indicated are too small to report (n<10). No students of “American Indian or Alaska Native” or “Native Hawaiian or Other

Origin” attend the Kendall Demonstration Elementary School.

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

The number of students who identify as “economically disadvantaged”, “not economically disadvantaged”, or where no socioeconomic status was indicated are too small to report (n<10).


IEP - Yes 15 0 15 733.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


Model Secondary School for the Deaf: High School Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (HSA MISA) Performance Data The HSA MISA was field tested in the 2017-18 school year; there are no reportable data at this time. The number of students who were assessed on the Alternate MISA are too small to report (n<10).

29 The number of students assessed by the Alternate Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (Alt-MISA) is too small to report (n<10). 30 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Academic Progress31

31 Five points were removed from the Academic Progress indicator as the Maryland Integrated Science Assessment results were not included in Maryland’s calculations for year one.

ACADEMIC PROGRESS HOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON OTHER ACADEMIC MEASURES AND GROWTH? The academic progress indicator consists of multiple academic measures. Schools are measured on the growth of students over time on math and ELA state tests, and on earning credit for a well-rounded curriculum.


Academic growth ELA 45.9% 6.00 out of 12.5

Academic growth math 51.4% 7.00 out of 12.5

Credit for completion of a well-rounded curriculum

94.1% 4.71 out of 5

17.71 EARNED POINTS



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of Academic Growth Data32

MEASURES INDICATOR

Comparable Scores for

Participation in

PARCC/MSAA

Points Earned for ELA Student

Growth Percentile (12.5 points)


Student Growth Percentile

(12.5 points)

Credit for Completion of a Well-rounded

Curriculum for Grades 5 and 8

(5 points)

Academic Total

(30 points)

Percent

POINTS EARNED n POINTS EARNED

All students 37 6.00 7.00 17 4.71 17.71 59.0




The following numbers represent the points

earned by each subgroup and will add up to the total points earned.



Asian -- 1.00 1.00 -- 0.59 2.59 8.6

Non -- 5.00 5.50 -- 4.12 14.62 48.7


16 1.00 1.00 -- 1.18 3.18 10.6

Non 21 3.50 3.50 -- 3.53 10.53 35.1

Hispanic/Latino -- 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 2.00 6.7

Non -- 4.50 6.00 N/A N/A 10.50 35.0

White 14 1.50 1.50 -- 2.65 5.65 18.8

Non 23 2.00 3.00 -- 2.06 7.06 23.5

Two or More Races

-- 1.00 1.00 -- 0.29 2.29 7.6

Non -- 5.50 7.00 -- 4.41 16.91 56.4

Not Indicated -- 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 2.00 6.7

Non -- 5.50 5.50 N/A N/A 11.00 36.7


37 6.00 7.00 17 4.71 17.71 59.0



-- 1.00 1.00 -- 1.47 3.47 11.6

Non -- 1.00 1.00 -- 0.59 2.59 8.6

No Response -- 1.00 2.00 -- 2.94 5.94 19.8





Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Graduation Rate

ARE STUDENTS GRADUATING ON TIME? The graduation rate indicator is a combination of the percentage of ninth grade students who completed high school within four years or within five years.

GRADUATION RATE


4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate

68.6% 6.86 out of 10

5-year adjusted cohort graduation rate

91.9% 4.60 out of 5

11.46 EARNED POINTS



Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Graduation Data33


MEASURES INDICATOR Graduation Rates by Cohort 4-year Cohort

(10 points) 5-year Cohort

(5 points) Graduation

Total (15 points)

Percent

4-year 5-year POINTS EARNED

n % n %

All students 51 68.6 37 91.9 6.86 4.60 11.46 76.4


The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and

will not add up to the total points earned

The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and will not add up to the total points earned.

Asian -- 33.3 -- 100.0 3.33 5.00 8.33 55.5

Non -- 66.7 -- 78.4 6.67 3.92 10.59 70.6


13 46.2 -- 75.0 4.62 3.75 8.37 55.8

Non 38 74.5 -- 75.7 7.45 3.79 11.24 74.9

Hispanic/Latino 14 64.3 -- 100.0 6.43 5.00 11.43 76.2

Non 37 72.5 -- 83.8 7.25 4.19 11.44 76.3


-- 100.0 N/A N/A 10.00 N/A 10.00 66.7

Non -- 66.7 N/A N/A 6.67 N/A 6.67 44.5

White 19 89.5 18 90.0 8.95 4.50 13.45 89.7

Non 32 62.7 19 43.2 6.27 2.16 8.43 56.2

Two or More Races -- 100.0 -- 100.0 10.00 5.00 15.00 100.0

Non -- 66.7 -- 85.5 6.67 4.28 10.95 73.0


51 68.6 37 91.9 6.86 4.60 11.46 76.4

Non N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A


-- 0.1 N/A N/A 0.01 N/A 0.01 0.1

Non -- 1.2 N/A N/A 0.12 N/A 0.12 0.8

Not Indicated 41 80.4 N/A N/A 8.04 N/A 8.04 53.6



Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Readiness for Post-Secondary Success

READINESS FOR POST-SECONDARY SUCCESS HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE ON-TRACK FOR SUCCESS AFTER HIGH SCHOOL? This high school indicator is a combination of the percent of 9th grade students earning four credits, and the percent of students completing high school meeting a variety of standards beyond their required coursework.

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Post-Secondary Enrollment Rates

From the 2016-17 graduation cohort, 18 students (40.9%) matriculate at private & out of-state institutions; all other data are too small to report (n<10).


Percent of 9th graders on-track for graduation

59.3% 2.04 out of 5

Percent of students completing a well-rounded curriculum

73.1% 2.50 out of 5

4.54 EARNED POINTS



Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of Readiness for Post-Secondary Success34

MEASURES INDICATOR

On-track in 9th Grade (5 points)

Credit for Completion of a Well-rounded Curriculum (5 points)

Readiness for Post-Secondary Success Total

(10 points)

Percent

Enrolled 9th

graders

On-track 9th

graders

POINTS EARNED

Enrolled 12th graders

12th graders completing a well-

rounded curriculum

POINTS EARNED

All students 27 16 2.04 52 38 2.50 4.54 45.4


The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and will not add up to the total points earned.




-- -- 0.19 N/A N/A 1.00 0.19 1.9

Non -- -- 2.78 52 38 2.50 5.28 52.8

Asian -- -- N/A -- -- 1.00 1.00 10.0

Non -- -- 2.04 -- -- 2.00 4.04 40.4


-- -- 1.11 18 10 1.00 2.11 21.1

Non -- -- 3.07 34 28 1.00 4.07 40.7

Hispanic/Latino -- -- 0.37 12 -- 1.00 1.37 13.7

Non -- -- 2.59 40 -- 1.00 3.59 35.9


N/A N/A N/A -- N/A 1.00 1.00 10.0

Non 27 16 2.04 -- 38 2.50 4.54 45.4

White 13 -- 1.11 25 22 1.00 2.11 21.1

Non 14 -- 3.07 18 16 1.00 4.07 40.7

Two or More Races

-- -- 0.37 N/A N/A 1.00 1.37 13.7

Non -- -- 1.00 52 38 2.50 3.50 35.0

Not Indicated -- -- 0.19 -- -- 1.00 1.19 11.9

Non -- -- 2.78 -- -- 2.00 4.78 47.8


27 16 2.04 52 38 2.50 4.54 45.4

Non N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A


N/A N/A N/A -- -- 1.00 1.00 10.0

Non N/A N/A N/A -- -- 1.00 1.00 10.0

Not Indicated 27 16 2.04 40 29 1.00 3.04 30.4




Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): School Quality or Student Success35

SCHOOL QUALITY OR STUDENT SUCCESS WHAT IS THE QUALITY OF THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT? This indicator includes the percent of students not absent 10 percent or more school days during the year, a school survey, and the percent of students enrolled in a well-rounded curriculum.

Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): School Quality or Student Success36

SCHOOL QUALITY OR STUDENT SUCCESS WHAT IS THE QUALITY OF THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT? This indicator includes the percent of students not absent 10 percent or more school days during the year, a school survey, and the percent of students enrolled in a well-rounded curriculum.

35 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success. 36 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available.


Percent of students not chronically absent

82.4% 9.50 out of 15

School climate survey Not administered in 2017-18

Percent of students with access to a well-rounded curriculum

35.3% 3.53 out of 10

13.03 EARNED POINTS



Percent of students not chronically absent

81.0% 9.00 out of 15

School climate survey Not administered in 2017-18

Percent of students with access to a well-rounded curriculum

9.2% 0.92 out of 10

9.92 EARNED POINTS



Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Disaggregation of School Quality and Student Success Data37


Enrollment38 Not

Chronically Absent

(15 points)

School Climate Survey

(10 points) 39

Access to a Well-rounded Curriculum for Grades 5 and 8

(10 points)

School Quality and

Student Success Total

(25 points)

Percent

POINTS EARNED n POINTS EARNED

All students 51 9.50

17 3.53 13.03 52.1


The following numbers

represent the points earned by each subgroup

and will not add up to the total points earned.


subgroup and will add up to the total points earned.



Asian -- 1.00

-- 0.59 1.59 6.4

Non -- 5.00

-- 2.94 7.94 31.8


18 1.00

N/A N/A 1.00 4.0

Non 33 1.00

N/A N/A 1.00 4.0

Hispanic/Latino -- 1.00

N/A N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 6.50

N/A N/A 6.50 26.0

White 23 1.00

-- 2.94 3.94 15.8

Non 28 1.00

-- 0.59 1.59 6.4

Two or More Races

-- 1.00

N/A N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 9.00

N/A N/A 9.00 36.0

Not Indicated -- 1.00 N/A N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 8.00 N/A N/A 8.00 32.0


51 10.00

17 3.53 13.53 54.1

Non N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A


-- 1.00

-- 1.76 2.76 11.0

Non -- 1.00

-- 0.59 1.59 6.4

No Response -- 1.00 -- 1.18 2.18 8.7



37 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 38 School enrollment data is based on the September 15, 2017 enrollment counts. Clerc Center provided attendance data based on these data. 39 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.


Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Disaggregation of School Quality and Student Success Data40


Enrollment Not Chronically

Absent (15 points)

School Climate Survey (10 points)41

Access to a Well-rounded

Curriculum (10 points)

School Quality and Student

Success Total (25 points)

Percent

POINTS EARNED

All students 174 9.00

0.92 9.92 39.7


The following numbers represent the points

earned by each subgroup and will not

add up to the total points earned.

The following numbers represent the points earned by each subgroup and will add up to

the total points earned.




-- 1.00

N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 8.50

N/A 8.50 34.0

Asian 15 1.00

0.06 1.06 4.2

Non 159 6.50

0.86 7.36 31.4


44 1.00

0.06 1.06 4.2

Non 130 1.00

0.86 1.86 7.4

Hispanic/Latino 33 1.00

N/A 1.00 4.0

Non 141 3.00

N/A 3.00 12.0


-- 1.00

N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 9.00

N/A 9.00 36.0

White 92 1.00

0.75 1.75 7.0

Non 82 1.00

0.17 1.17 4.7

Two or More Races

11 1.00

0.06 1.06 4.2

Non 163 6.50

0.86 7.36 29.4

Not Indicated -- 1.00 N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 8.00 N/A 8.00 32.0


174 9.00

0.92 9.92 39.7

Non N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A


-- 1.00

N/A 1.00 4.0

Non -- 1.00

N/A 1.00 4.0

Not Indicated 140 2.00 0.63 2.63 10.5


40 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 41 The school climate survey was not administered in 2017-18 therefore 10 points were removed from the calculation for School Quality and Student Success.


Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (K-8): Progress Toward Annual Long-Term Measurement Objectives42,43

42 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 43 The annual targets and interim progress targets for academic achievement data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx 44 Maryland will begin reporting improvement starting in the 2018-19 school year.

Academic Achievement English Language Proficiency

ELA (percent proficient)

Math (percent proficient)

Percent of ELs making ELP

School Annual target

Improvement44 School Annual target Improvement School Annual target

Improvement

ALL students 16.7 44.84 N/A 20.4 38.07 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met

Asian 3.7 71.22 N/A 1.9 69.74 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met


5.6 29.49 N/A 7.4 20.61 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met

Hispanic or Latino

1.9 30.42 N/A N/A 24.29 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met

Two or More Races

N/A 50.84 N/A N/A 43.62 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met

White 5.6 58.29 N/A 11.1 52.54 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met

Special Education

16.7 13.61 N/A 20.4 14.40 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Met Met


5.6 26.64 N/A 3.7 20.70 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met




Model Secondary School for the Deaf (9-12): Progress Toward Annual Long-Term Measurement Objectives45,46

Academic Achievement Graduation Rate47 English Language Proficiency

ELA (percent proficient)

Math (percent proficient)

4-year Cohort (percent graduating)

5-year Cohort (percent graduating)

Percent of ELs making ELP

School Annual target Improvement48 School Annual target Improvement School Annual target Improvement School Annual target

Improvement School Annual target Improvement

ALL students 6.9 44.84 N/A 9.2 38.07 N/A 68.6 87.04 N/A 91.9 88.62 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Not Met Met

American Indian or Alaska Native

0.9 42.49 N/A 0.9 31.95 N/A N/A 83.35 N/A N/A 84.62 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met N/A N/A

Asian 0.9 71.22 N/A N/A 69.74 N/A 33.3 93.80 N/A 100.0 94.71 N/A N/A N/A N/A



N/A 29.49 N/A 0.9 20.61 N/A 46.2 82.18 N/A 75.0 84.53 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

Hispanic or Latino

N/A 30.42 N/A N/A 24.29 N/A 64.3 81.82 N/A 100.0 84.70 N/A N/A N/A N/A



N/A 47.31 N/A N/A 41.90 N/A 100.0 92.09 N/A N/A 95.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Met N/A

Two or more races

1.7 50.84 N/A 1.8 43.62 N/A 100.0 94.03 N/A 100.0 94.84 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Met Met

White 3.4 58.29 N/A 5.5 52.54 N/A 89.5 90.89 N/A 90.0 91.73 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

Special education

6.9 13.61 N/A 9.2 14.40 N/A 68.6 70.38 N/A 91.9 74.19 N/A N/A N/A N/A


Economically disadvantaged

0.9 26.64 N/A 1.8 20.70 N/A 0.1 82.23 N/A N/A 85.98 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Not Met Not Met Not Met N/A

45 Dashes represent instances when reporting data are for fewer than 10 students. N/A denotes that no data are available. 46 The annual targets and interim goals for academic achievement and graduation data are located in Maryland’s Every Student Succeeds Act Plan. More information about the plan can be found at http://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Pages/DAPI/ESSA/index.aspx 47 The Model Secondary School for the Deaf did not disaggregate graduation data for 2016-17 therefore improvement data by subgroup is unavailable. 48 Maryland will begin reporting improvement in the 2018-19 school year.


Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) Data49

In-school Suspensions

Out-of-school suspensions

Expulsions School related arrests

Referral to law

enforcement

Chronic absenteeism (excused and unexcused)

Incidents of violence including

bullying and harassment)

Students Enrolled in Preschool

Students enrolled in

Accelerated Coursework

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

All students 71 100.0 92 100.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 17 7.6 76 100.0 41 40.0 16 9.2

Male Students 52 73.2 59 64.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61 80.3 N/A N/A 13 7.5

Female Students

19 26.8 33 35.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 19.7 N/A N/A -- --

American Indian or Alaskan Native Students

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --

Asian Students -- --

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --

Black/African American Students

29 40.9 11 12.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 18.4 N/A N/A -- --

Hispanic/Latino Students

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Students

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --

White Students 35 49.3 72 78.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 4.4 56 73.7 N/A N/A 13 7.5

Not Indicated -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --

Students of Two or More Races

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- N/A N/A -- --


71 100.0 92 100.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- 17 7.6 76 100.0 N/A N/A 16 9.2

Clerc Center does not collect data on English Language Learners.



Educator Qualifications Data

Clerc Center

n %

Teacher teaching with provisional credentials 11 22.9

Credentialed teacher with 1-3 years of teaching experience

-- --

Credentialed teacher with 4+ years of teaching experience, teaching within the license area

30 62.5

N/A -- --

Plan for Calculating Per Pupil Expenditures for the Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center

The Clerc Center is a fully federally funded organization by direct appropriation from Congress to operate two demonstration schools, Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (KDES) and Model Secondary School for the Deaf (MSSD), and to provide national outreach, training and technical assistance to schools and programs nationwide. Funds are appropriated through the US Department of Education to Gallaudet University. Gallaudet sets funding levels for the Clerc Center’s operating budget, less shared costs. In addition, a small percentage of students (<1%) are placed in the Clerc Center by their home local education agency (LEA) and funds are received from the LEA for portions of the student’s program. The Clerc Center is not affiliated with a local school district nor state department of education and, therefore, must absorb the functions normally provided by those offices into its operations. These roles are integrated into staff roles with both national and local responsibilities.

In order to determine an appropriate calculation of per pupil expenditures for the Clerc Center’s schools, KDES and MSSD, the Clerc Center will:

• Review the guidance for LEAs and independent schools issued by the State of Maryland to assess appropriateness as applied to the Clerc Center’s unique funding model.

• Review the process for calculating per pupil expenditures at schools for the deaf in other states.

• Work with Gallaudet University to determine shared cost of operational services delivered by the University including student health services, facilities, physical plant, custodial, grounds, transportation, human resources, and finance.

• Determine the cost splitting of personnel assigned to both national and local work.

The above analyses will help determine the categories to be included in the numerator for the calculation of per pupil expenditures, as well as specific definitions of those categories given the unique funding and operational model of the Clerc Center. Some categories, such as physical plant, may need to be formula based as campus buildings are not currently individually metered for electrical use. Formulas would need to be defined, for example, as a square footage percentage of total campus usage. Similar challenges and formula-based calculations may exist with administrative functions (e.g. human resources, finance).

The proposed formula will be reviewed by the Clerc Center’s leadership, Gallaudet’s senior leadership, and the US Department of Education prior to finalizing.

ANNUAL REPORT CARD 2017-2018 - Gallaudet University Center... · 2019-03-19 · Report Card...

Documents

Transcript of ANNUAL REPORT CARD 2017-2018 - Gallaudet University Center... · 2019-03-19 · Report Card...