Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

19
Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008 Ankeny Community Schools

description

Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008. Ankeny Community Schools. Parent Information-ITBS/ITED Data. Students in Ankeny and around the nation take norm-referenced tests which include the Iowa Test of Basic Skills and the Iowa Test of Educational Development . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Page 1: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Annual Progress Report Data2007-2008

Ankeny Community Schools

Page 2: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Parent Information-ITBS/ITED Data

Students in Ankeny and around the nation take norm-referenced tests which include the Iowa Test of Basic Skills and the Iowa Test of Educational Development.

Norm referenced tests are standardized tests for which scores are compared to other specific groups of students who take the same test in the same year (Glossary of Testing Measurement and Statistical Terms, 1999). i.e., a third grader’s score in Ankeny is compared

with other third grader’s scores in other states and schools who take the same test.

Page 3: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

ITBS Testing Data-4th, 8th and 11th grade

ITBS, defines student proficiency as scoring in the 40th percentile nationally or above (APR 2007-2008).

Overall, Ankeny students are proficient on the ITBS, as evidenced by the following scores in 2007-2008: • Reading-88.9%

• Math-89.8%• Science-89.4%

4th grade

• Reading-84.3%• Math-89.9%• Science-92%

8th grade

• Reading-85.6%• Math-83.9%• Science-88.3%

11th grade

Page 4: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

ITBS/ITED Data-Other grade reports

Students in 6th through 12th grade also take the ITBS/ITED tests (APR 2007-2008).

Ankeny’s students scored above grade level in every subject tested; reading, math and science.

Only the current 6th and 7th graders reading scores showed less than one year of growth nationally, from the previous year.

The 8th through 10th and 12th graders reading scores all showed at least one grade level of growth, from the previous year.

The 6th through 12th graders math and science scores all showed at least one grade level of growth, from the previous year.

Page 5: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Data for Teachers Students in our elementary and secondary

schools, consistently scored 80% proficient or higher on ITBS/ITED tests, from 2001-2008.

Math has made the most significant gains in our school’s annual improvement goals and results (APR 2007-2008). With seven grade levels tested, 57% of the grade levels showed that they met or exceeded their math goal.

Science scores for the same time period and grade levels, showed 43% of the grade levels met their goal.

Reading scores for the same time period and grade levels, showed 29% of the grade levels met their goal.

Page 6: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Data for Northview-Reading 8th graders at Northview, consistently meet all of

their reading, math and science annual improvement goals as a whole class. Yeah for us!

However, the sub-groups at Northview are struggling.

Reading proficiency scores for: SES Non-SES 61.1% 86% =24.9% difference

IEP Non-IEP 41.4% 86.8% =45.4% difference

Page 7: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Data for Northview-Math

Math proficiency scores for: SES Non-SES 75% 91% =16%

difference

IEP Non-IEP 68.9% 91.1% =22.2%

difference

Page 8: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

Data for Northview-Science Science proficiency scores: SES Non-SES 72.2% 93.3% =21.1% difference

IEP Non-IEP 73.4% 93.1% =19.7% difference

Clearly, these data points give us a place to start when we discuss the mission of our PLC’s this year. Improving teaching and learning will benefit all of our students, not just the students in the sub-groups.

Page 9: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data

Long-range goals for students in reading, math and science is 100% proficiency by the year 2013-2014 (APR 2007-2008).

All grade levels have not achieved proficiency in all tested areas on the ITBS/ITEDs (APR 2007-2008).

Math has shown the most improvement at all grade levels, followed by science, then reading.

Identified sub-groups of students (IEP, SES) have not achieved at the same proficiency levels as non-identified groups of students.

Page 10: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-4th Grade Math

• 59.7% proficient

• 93.2% proficient

• 91.4% proficient

• 75.8% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SESSES

Page 11: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data- 11th Grade Math

• 43.3% proficient

• 86.7% proficient

• 84.9% proficient

• 71.4% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SES SES

Page 12: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-4th Grade Science

• 56.7% proficient

• 93.6% proficient

• 91.7% proficient

• 71.4% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SESSES

Page 13: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-11th Grade Science

• 50% proficient• 90.9%

proficient

• 89.6% proficient

• 71.4% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SESSES

Page 14: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-4th Grade Reading

• 43.5% proficient

• 93.9% proficient

• 90.7% proficient

• 72.1% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SESSES

Page 15: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-11th Grade Reading

• 40% proficient• 89.7%

proficient

• 88.2% proficient

• 66.7% proficient

IEP Non-IEP

Non-SESSES

Page 16: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data The difference in proficiency scores ranged

from 19.7%-50.4%, for the IEP students as compared to the Non-IEP students.

Reading scores showed the highest difference at all grade levels, then math, followed by science, for the above set of students.

The difference in proficiency scores ranged from 13.5%-24.9%, for the SES students as compared to the Non-SES students.

Reading scores showed the highest difference at all grade levels, then science, then math, for the above set of students.

Page 17: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data

Steps to address these issues include: PLC formation to address student achievement at

elementary and secondary levels Time built into the weekly schedule for

professional development Instructional Coaches to help teachers and

administrators implement data driven teaching strategies

Focus on reading comprehension and enrichment at all levels

Administration and teacher commitment to improve student achievement

Page 18: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data-Celebrations All sub-groups meet the minimum proficiency

standards of 40th percentile. All male students as a group and all female

students as a group, scored 81% or better in all three tested and reportable areas.

All male students and female students at all grade levels, and subjects tested, scored within eight percentage points or less of each other.

All students identified as Gifted and Talented, scored 100% proficiency on every test, at every grade level.

Page 19: Annual Progress Report Data 2007-2008

School Board Data Celebrations

Graduation Rate

•Average graduation rate from 2001-2008, is 96.8%•The range from 2001-2008, is 95.06% to 98.4%

Attendance

•Ankeny’s average daily attendance, 96.05%•State of Iowa’s average daily attendance, 95.25%

ACT Scores

•2004-2008 scores range from 22.9 to 23.4•Ankeny students score from .4% to 1.5% higher than other students in Iowa in all categories