Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and...

12
103 R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014 Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation Name Affiliation 1. M. Govinda Rao NIPFP, New Delhi Kirit Parikh, (Panelist and Chair) IRADe, New Delhi 2. Rakesh Bhalla (Panelist) IREDA, New Delhi Meena Agarwal (Panelist) Ministry of Finance, New Delhi 3. Pradeep Dadhich (Panelist) Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India, New Delhi Anil Kumar Jain (Panelist) Planning Commission, New Delhi 4. Usha Rao (Panelist) KFW, New Delhi D.N. Prasad (Panelist) Ministry of Coal, New Delhi 5. Shailly Kedia TERI, New Delhi Tapas Sen NIPFP, New Delhi 6. Sriya Mohanti Shakti Foundation, New Delhi Krishan Dhawan Shakti Foundation, New Delhi 7. Sohail Akhtar Ministry of New Renewable Energy, New Delhi Shashank Jain Shakti Foundation, New Delhi 8. K. Yepthu IREDA, New Delhi Chinmaya Kumar Acharya Shakti Foundation, New Delhi 9. Aparna Vashisth TERI, New Delhi SriyaMohanti Shakti Foundation, New Delhi 10. Manish Anand TERI, New Delhi AnkitaBhatnagar Intern, Shakti Foundation, New Delhi 11. Anandayit Goswami TERI Africa ManjushaShukla IREDA, New Delhi 12. Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi Rakesh Bhalla IREDA, New Delhi 13. Ashirbad Raha Climate Group, India S. Padmanaban USAID, New Delhi 14. Pramode Kant Institute of Green Economy, New Delhi Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi

Transcript of Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and...

Page 1: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

103R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014

Annexure 1Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study

S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2

Name Affiliation Name Affiliation

1. M. Govinda Rao NIPFP, New Delhi Kirit Parikh, (Panelist and Chair)

IRADe, New Delhi

2. Rakesh Bhalla (Panelist)

IREDA, New Delhi Meena Agarwal (Panelist)

Ministry of Finance, New Delhi

3. Pradeep Dadhich (Panelist)

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India, New Delhi

Anil Kumar Jain (Panelist)

Planning Commission, New Delhi

4. Usha Rao (Panelist)

KFW, New Delhi D.N. Prasad (Panelist)

Ministry of Coal, New Delhi

5. Shailly Kedia TERI, New Delhi Tapas Sen NIPFP, New Delhi6. Sriya Mohanti Shakti Foundation,

New DelhiKrishan Dhawan Shakti Foundation,

New Delhi7. Sohail Akhtar Ministry of New

Renewable Energy, New Delhi

Shashank Jain Shakti Foundation, New Delhi

8. K. Yepthu IREDA, New Delhi Chinmaya Kumar Acharya

Shakti Foundation, New Delhi

9. Aparna Vashisth TERI, New Delhi SriyaMohanti Shakti Foundation, New Delhi

10. Manish Anand TERI, New Delhi AnkitaBhatnagar Intern, Shakti Foundation, New Delhi

11. Anandayit Goswami

TERI Africa ManjushaShukla IREDA, New Delhi

12. Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi Rakesh Bhalla IREDA, New Delhi13. Ashirbad Raha Climate Group, India S. Padmanaban USAID, New Delhi14. Pramode Kant Institute of Green

Economy, New Delhi

Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi

Page 2: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

104 Annexure 1: Experts and Stakeholders Consulted

S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2

Name Affiliation Name Affiliation

15. Lydia Powell Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi

Monali Zeya Hazra USAID, New Delhi

16. Karthik Ganeshan Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi

Mudit Narain World Bank, New Delhi

17. Vyoma Jha Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi

Veena Joshi Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, New Delhi

18. Rishabh Jain Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi

PreetiSoni UNDP, New Delhi

19. Abhinav Goyal Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi

Pramode Kant Institute of Green Economy, New Delhi

20. Shradha Kapur C-Kinetics, New Delhi Sanjay Dube Nexant, New Delhi21. Anil Kumar IIEC, New Delhi22. Dilip Limaye SRC Global, Greater

Philadelphia Area, USA

23. Mahesh Patankar MP Ensystems Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai

24. Ahmad Khalid Adelphi, New Delhi25. Manpreet Singh KPMG, Gurgaon26. Stuti Sharma KPMG, Gurgaon27. Sameer Maithel Greentech

Knowledge Solutions Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

28. Abhinav Goyal CSE, New Delhi29. Probir Ghosh Sustainable Resource

& Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Colorado, USA

30. Subir Das Sustainable Resource & Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata

31. Sumana Bhattacharya

Interco-operation India, New Delhi

32. Bhasker Padigala WWF, New Delhi

Page 3: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

105R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014

Annexure 2

Norms for computing likely annual savings of conventional fuel/electricity through renewable energy deployment

Renewable energy source/system Likely annual savings of conventional fuel/electricity

Wind power 2.00 million unit/MWSmall hydro power 3.00 million unit/MWSolar photovoltaic (PV) power 1.66 million unit/MWSolar PV lantern 50 L K-oil/lanternSolar PV home lighting system 100 L K-oil/systemSolar thermal energy 1.00 MU/MW

• Power generation 36 TOE/1,000 m2 collector area•Thermal energy systems 0.50–0.70 MU/1,000 m2 collector area

Bio energy 4.00 million unit/MW1. Bagasse cogeneration 6.00 million unit/MW2. Biomass power 1,000 TOE/MWeq

3. Biomass energy (thermal) 4.00 million unit/MW4. Urban and industrial waste to energy 1,000 TOE/MWeq

a. Power generation 450 kg LPG/1,000 m3 biogas b. Thermal energy/cogeneration 0.36 million units/1,000 m3 biogas

5. Family type biogas plants6. Medium size biogas plants

MW Megawatt (installed capacity of power plant)MWeq Megawatt equivalent-do-MU Million units (electricity generated saved)TOE Tonnes of oil equivalent (oil saved)LPG Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG saved)Remark 1 Unit of electricity = 0.7 kg of oil

Norms for Computing Likely Energy Saving from RE Usage

Page 4: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

107R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014

Following is a real world example of projects under implementation and recently completed where extensive monitoring and evaluation handles have been provided at the design stage and also being utilised. For purposes of confidentiality the names and agencies have been kept out.Renewable energy based power generation project: REPP project planning matrix

Annexure 3Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Page 5: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

108 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Goa

lC

umul

ativ

e gr

eenh

ouse

gas

em

issi

on

redu

ctio

n fr

om p

ower

gen

erat

ion

in

proj

ect i

n co

untr

y x

by th

e en

d of

pr

ojec

t (E

OP)

, kto

ns C

O2

316.

493

5.8a

DO

E r

ecor

ds, I

PP p

ower

gen

era-

tion

data

, nat

iona

l sta

tistic

s,

natio

nal c

omm

unic

atio

ns,

FRE

PP p

rogr

ess

repo

rts

and

M&

E r

epor

ts

Tra

nspa

renc

y of

dec

isio

n m

akin

g, c

oope

ratio

n of

sta

keho

lder

s in

the

prov

isio

n of

dat

a, s

tabl

e po

litic

al e

nvir

onm

ent

Red

uctio

n of

gre

en-

hous

e ga

s em

issi

ons

from

pro

ject

in

coun

try

x’s

pow

er

sect

orP

roje

ct o

bjec

tive

bC

umul

ativ

e in

stal

led

new

pri

vate

sec

tor-

owne

d R

E-b

ased

pow

er g

ener

atio

n ca

paci

ty b

y E

OP,

MW

0c4.

7dSu

rvey

of

IPP

inve

stm

ent

activ

ities

, int

ervi

ews

with

pr

ospe

ctiv

e in

vest

ors,

FT

IB

appr

oval

s, fi

nanc

ing

docu

-m

ents

fro

m b

anks

/fina

ncia

l in

stitu

tions

, RE

PP p

rogr

ess

repo

rts

and

M&

E r

epor

ts,

FEA

ann

ual r

epor

ts, D

OE

ye

arly

ene

rgy

stat

istic

s

Inve

stor

s pe

rcei

ve c

urre

nt

gove

rnan

ce s

yste

ms

as

cond

uciv

e fo

r do

ing

busi

ness

in th

e co

untr

y.

Cou

ntry

’s s

over

eign

ris

k ca

n be

man

aged

thro

ugh

gove

rnm

ent g

uara

ntee

s

Rem

oval

of

maj

or

barr

iers

to th

e w

ides

prea

d an

d co

st-e

ffec

tive

use

of

grid

-bas

ed r

enew

-ab

le e

nerg

y su

pply

vi

a co

mm

erci

ally

vi

able

ren

ewab

le

ener

gy te

chno

logi

es

Shar

e of

RE

in p

roje

ct in

cou

ntry

x’s

po

wer

gen

erat

ion

mix

by

EO

P, %

5289

.0

Cum

ulat

ive

elec

tric

ity p

rodu

ctio

n fr

om

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

gen

erat

ion

plan

ts b

y E

OP,

GW

h

494.

01,

505.

1e

Out

com

e 1

Cum

ulat

ive

inve

stm

ent o

n R

E-b

ased

po

wer

gen

erat

ion

by E

OP,

US$

mill

ion

010

0Su

rvey

of

IPP

inve

stm

ent

activ

ities

, int

ervi

ews

with

pr

ospe

ctiv

e in

vest

ors,

FT

IB a

ppro

vals

, Fin

anci

ng

docu

men

ts f

rom

ban

ks/F

Is,

FRE

PP p

rogr

ess

repo

rts

and

M&

E r

epor

ts

Inve

stm

ent c

limat

e do

es n

ot

dete

rior

ate

furt

her,

polit

i-ca

l sta

bilit

y m

aint

aine

d,

gove

rnm

ent a

ble

to ta

ke

on a

dditi

onal

con

tinge

nt

liabi

litie

s

Faci

litat

ion

of in

vest

-m

ents

on

ener

gy

proj

ects

, par

-tic

ular

ly o

n R

E

and

biom

ass

base

d po

wer

gen

erat

ion

Page 6: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

109Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Out

put 1

.1: g

over

n-m

ent e

nerg

y A

ctN

o. o

f pr

opos

ed a

rtic

les

on th

e en

ergy

bill

th

at a

re e

ndor

sing

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

ge

nera

tion

in p

roje

ct in

cou

ntry

x

0D

ec 20

12C

abin

et r

ecor

ds (

Gaz

ette

)R

elev

ant k

ey s

take

hold

ers

such

as

Prim

e M

inst

ers

Offi

ce, M

inis

try

of

Just

ice

are

supp

ortiv

e an

d co

-ope

rativ

e. D

ecre

e ba

sed

legi

slat

ion

acce

pt-

able

to f

orei

gn in

vest

ors

A c

abin

et-a

ppro

ved

com

preh

ensi

ve

Ene

rgy

Act

pro

mul

gate

d0

Dec

2011

Inst

itutio

nal r

efor

m o

f D

OE

to e

ffec

tivel

y ad

min

iste

r th

e Pr

ojec

t in

coun

try

x E

nerg

y le

gisl

atio

n

0Ju

n 20

12O

rgan

isat

iona

l cha

rt o

f D

OE

Fund

ing

for

the

orga

n-is

atio

nal r

efor

ms

are

appr

oved

Out

put 1

.2: i

mpl

e-m

entin

g ru

les

and

regu

latio

ns (

IRR

s)

No.

of

spec

ific

IRR

s en

forc

ed b

y E

OP

0D

ec 20

13G

over

nmen

t gaz

ette

, pub

licat

ion

of r

egul

atio

nPo

litic

al w

ill e

xist

s to

ap

prov

e an

d en

forc

e IR

Rs.

Inv

esto

rs a

nd le

nd-

ers

inte

rest

s is

pro

tect

edN

o. o

f re

vise

d IR

Rs

prop

osed

to e

nhan

ce

ener

gy a

ct im

plem

enta

tion

by E

OP

0D

ec 20

13O

utpu

t 1.3

: G

over

nmen

t age

n-ci

es w

ith e

nhan

ced

regu

lato

ry a

nd in

sti-

tutio

nal c

apac

ity o

n en

ergy

dev

elop

-m

ent,

in g

ener

al,

and

RE

dev

elop

-m

ent i

n pa

rtic

ular

No.

of

RE

reg

ulat

ions

and

lega

l fra

me-

wor

ks a

dmin

iste

red

by D

OE

sen

ior

staf

f fo

r IP

P pr

ojec

ts a

nd r

ural

ele

ctri

fi-ca

tion

by E

OP

01

Staf

f pe

rfor

man

ce a

nnua

l rep

ort,

DO

E fi

les,

lice

nse

issu

edR

eten

tion

of s

kille

d pe

rson

-ne

l, jo

b ev

alua

tion

reco

mm

enda

tion

Perc

enta

ge o

f ap

prov

ed R

E-b

ased

pow

er

gene

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts th

at a

re f

ully

-co

mpl

iant

with

DO

E-a

dmin

iste

red

RE

re

gula

tory

and

lega

l fra

mew

orks

by

EO

P

010

0

Page 7: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

110 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Out

com

e 2

No.

of

iden

tified

tech

nica

lly v

iabl

e R

E

proj

ects

EO

P0

6D

OE

file

s, D

OE

ann

ual r

epor

tsFE

A is

not

pri

vatiz

ed (

sold

) co

mpl

etel

y an

d co

-op

erat

es in

an

effo

rt to

m

obili

ze p

riva

te s

ecto

r ca

pita

l.

Tech

nica

l fea

sibi

lity

of h

arne

ssin

g R

E

reso

urce

s ar

e as

cer-

tain

ed a

nd m

ade

wid

ely

know

n

No.

of

inve

stor

s th

at m

ade

use

of a

vail-

able

tech

nica

l inf

orm

atio

n on

fea

sibl

e R

E-b

ased

ene

rgy

syst

em p

roje

cts

by

EO

P

020

Out

put 2

.1: o

pera

tiona

l ce

ntra

lized

ene

rgy

data

base

sys

tem

No.

of

clie

nts

that

req

uest

ser

vice

s fr

om

the

cent

ral c

lear

ingh

ouse

for

thei

r R

E-b

ased

ene

rgy

syst

ems

proj

ect E

OP

030

0D

OE

file

s, D

OE

ann

ual r

epor

ts,

info

rmat

ion

requ

est a

nd

feed

back

for

ms

Gov

ernm

ent u

ses

its r

egul

a-to

ry p

ower

s to

ove

rrid

e co

mm

erci

al c

onfid

entia

l-ity

con

cern

s an

d or

ders

da

ta a

nd in

form

atio

n to

be

mad

e pu

blic

No.

of

clie

nts

that

mak

e us

e of

the

cent

ral

ener

gy d

atab

ase

syst

em e

ach

year

015

0

Perc

enta

ge o

f cl

eari

ngho

use

and

cent

ral

ener

gy d

atab

ase

syst

em c

lient

s ea

ch

year

that

are

sat

isfie

d w

ith th

e se

rvic

es

rece

ived

080

No.

of

impl

emen

ted

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

gen

-er

atio

n pr

ojec

ts th

at w

ere

faci

litat

ed

by th

e ce

ntra

l cle

arin

g ho

use

syst

em

by E

OP

020

Out

put 2

.2: c

ompl

eted

an

d pu

blis

hed

RE

res

ourc

e as

sess

men

ts

No.

of

com

preh

ensi

ve R

E r

esou

rce

asse

ss-

men

ts c

ompl

eted

by

EO

P0

12D

OE

file

s, D

OE

ann

ual r

epor

ts,

reso

urce

ass

essm

ent r

epor

ts,

Met

and

PW

D a

nnua

l re

port

s, f

ores

try

annu

al

repo

rts,

FE

A a

nnua

l rep

orts

, IP

P pr

opos

als

Res

ourc

e da

ta a

nd a

sses

s-m

ents

are

acc

urat

e an

d re

liabl

eA

vera

ge p

erce

ntag

e in

crea

se in

cur

-re

ntly

kno

wn

RE

pot

entia

ls th

at w

as

esta

blis

hed

afte

r th

e R

E r

esou

rce

asse

ssm

ents

0D

ec 20

13

No.

of

inve

stor

s th

at m

ade

use

of th

e R

E

reso

urce

ass

essm

ent d

ata/

info

rmat

ion

in th

e de

sign

of

thei

r R

E-b

ased

pow

er

gene

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts b

y E

OP

06

Page 8: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

111Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Out

put 2

.3: a

sses

sed

feas

ibili

ty o

f R

E

inve

stm

ents

No.

of

com

plet

ed a

nd p

ublis

hed

new

fe

asib

ility

stu

dies

of

IPP

inve

stm

ents

by

EO

P

06

DO

E w

ebsi

te, I

PP p

ropo

s-al

s, D

OE

Cor

pora

te p

lan,

FE

A A

nnua

l rep

orts

, FT

IB

reco

rds

Co-

finan

cing

com

pone

nts

secu

red

No.

of

plan

ned

new

fea

sibi

lity

anal

yses

to

be c

arri

ed o

ut (

afte

r FR

EPP

) by

EO

P0

4

Perc

enta

ge o

f in

tere

sted

inve

stor

s in

pr

ojec

t in

coun

try

x th

at e

xpre

ssed

con

-fid

ence

in th

e te

chni

cal a

nd fi

nanc

ial

viab

ilitie

s of

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

gen

era-

tion

proj

ects

by

EO

P

030

Out

com

e 3

No.

of

addi

tiona

l rur

al h

ouse

hold

s th

at

have

acc

ess

to g

reen

ele

ctri

city

by

EO

P0

10,0

00Si

gned

PPA

, con

trac

ts, fi

nanc

ing

agre

emen

ts, s

hare

hold

er

agre

emen

ts; H

IES

repo

rt,

DO

E a

nnua

l rep

orts

and

re

cord

s

Polit

ical

will

exi

sts

to a

llow

pr

ivat

e se

ctor

inve

stm

ent

in I

PP. F

EA

rem

ains

a

stat

e ow

ned

utili

ty,

Priv

ate

sect

or in

vest

ors

perc

eive

Pro

ject

in c

oun-

try

x as

via

ble

dest

ina-

tion.

Gov

ernm

ent r

ulin

g in

oth

er s

ecto

rs d

oes

not

unde

rmin

e in

vest

ors’

co

nfide

nce

Mar

kets

for

spe

cific

re

new

able

ene

rgy

tech

nolo

gies

are

su

ppor

ted

No.

of

finan

cial

clo

sure

s ac

hiev

ed f

or n

ew

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

gen

erat

ion

proj

ects

by

EO

P

020

No.

of

RE

T s

yste

m e

quip

men

t/com

pone

nt

supp

liers

& d

istr

ibut

ors

in P

roje

ct in

co

untr

y x

by E

OP

57

Ove

rall

volu

me

of b

usin

ess

in th

e R

E

mar

ket i

n Pr

ojec

t in

coun

try

x by

EO

P,

US$

mill

ion

010

0

Out

put 3

.1: d

esig

ned

and

impl

emen

ted

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

ge

nera

tion

dem

onst

ratio

n

Ove

rall

inst

alle

d ca

paci

ty o

f R

E-b

ased

po

wer

gen

erat

ion

dem

o pr

ojec

ts b

y E

OP,

MW

04.

7D

OE

rec

ords

, DO

E A

nnua

l R

epor

t, FE

A A

nnua

l R

epor

ts, F

EA

Cor

pora

te

plan

, DO

E C

orpo

rate

pla

n

Polit

ical

will

incl

udin

g G

over

nmen

t fun

ding

av

aila

ble

to im

plem

ent

dem

o pr

ojec

ts, r

esou

rce

owne

rshi

p no

t an

issu

e,

dem

o pr

ojec

ts a

re s

uc-

cess

ful i

nclu

ding

no

maj

or n

atur

al d

isas

ter

No.

of

dem

o pr

ojec

ts th

at a

re b

oth

oper

a-tio

nally

and

fina

ncia

lly v

iabl

e by

EO

P0

10

No.

of

plan

ned

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

gen

era-

tion

proj

ects

that

are

rep

licat

ing

any

of

the

dem

o pr

ojec

ts b

y E

OP

116

Tota

l ins

talle

d ca

paci

ty o

f re

plic

atio

n R

E-b

ased

pow

er g

ener

atio

n pr

ojec

ts

by E

OP

0A

t lea

st

3

Page 9: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

112 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Out

put 3

.2: p

repa

red

stan

dard

pow

er

purc

hase

agr

eem

ent

(PPA

) fo

r IP

Ps

End

orse

d St

anda

rd P

ower

Pur

chas

e A

gree

men

t (SP

PA)

tem

plat

es th

at

are

used

for

IPP

pro

ject

s in

pro

ject

in

coun

try

x

01f

Tend

er d

ocum

ents

for

com

peti-

tive

IPP

proc

urem

ent,

DO

E

web

site

Inte

rest

s of

all

part

ies

are

adeq

uate

ly p

rote

cted

No.

of

IPP

RE

-bas

ed p

ower

pro

ject

s th

at

mad

e us

e of

any

of

the

appr

oved

SPP

A

tem

plat

es b

y E

OP

06

Out

put 3

.3: c

ompl

eted

in

vest

men

t pro

mo-

tion

pack

age

No.

of

pros

pect

ive

inve

stor

s m

akin

g en

quir

ies

with

gov

ernm

ent a

genc

ies

015

DO

E A

nnua

l Rep

ort,

Rec

ord

of I

nves

tor

prop

osal

s,

Inve

stm

ent F

orum

Rep

ort,

Lis

t of

Part

icip

ants

Rol

e of

DO

E a

s an

inve

st-

men

t fac

ilita

tor

acce

pted

by

Cab

inet

Cum

ulat

ive

num

ber

of in

vest

ors

that

ex

pres

sed

and

plan

ned

to in

vest

and

im

plem

ent R

E-b

ased

pow

er g

ener

atio

n pr

ojec

ts b

y E

OP

010

Out

put 3

.4: C

ompl

eted

as

sess

men

t and

de

velo

ped

RE

in

cent

ives

sch

emes

A c

ompr

ehen

sive

rep

ort o

n op

tions

and

is

sues

rel

ated

to th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f a

subs

idy

fund

for

pri

vate

sec

tor

rene

w-

able

ene

rgy

inve

stm

ent p

ublis

hed

0gJu

n 20

12C

ompl

eted

fea

sibi

lity

repo

rtN

B: R

ef R

E f

und

desi

gn

thro

ugh

RE

SCO

Out

com

e 4

Cab

inet

app

rove

d-el

ectr

ifica

tion

mas

ter

plan

0D

ec 20

13M

aste

r pl

an d

ocum

ent,

DO

E

web

page

, DO

E fi

les,

FE

A

annu

al r

epor

t, D

OE

ene

rgy

stat

istic

s ye

ar b

ook

The

goa

l of

100

% e

lect

ri-

ficat

ion

is m

aint

aine

d;

rene

wab

le b

ased

pow

er

gene

ratio

n co

ntin

ue to

be

cost

com

petit

ive;

ren

ew-

able

ene

rgy

pote

ntia

l is

suffi

cien

t to

mee

t cur

rent

an

d fu

ture

dem

and

Ren

ewab

le e

nerg

y de

velo

pmen

ts in

te-

grat

ed in

to n

atio

nal

ener

gy p

lan

tow

ards

10

0 %

ele

ctri

fica-

tion

of p

roje

ct in

co

untr

y x

Ave

rage

ann

ual b

udge

t for

the

elec

trifi

ca-

tion

mas

ter

plan

by

EO

P, U

S$ m

illio

n0

10

Perc

enta

ge u

tiliz

atio

n of

cou

ntry

’s R

E

reso

urce

s (f

or p

ower

pur

pose

s) b

y E

OP

5290

Page 10: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

113Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Stra

tegy

Indi

cato

rB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Sour

ce o

f ve

rific

atio

nR

isks

and

ass

umpt

ions

Out

put 4

.1: c

ompl

eted

tr

aini

ng p

rogr

amm

e on

inte

grat

ed

ener

gy p

lann

ing

(IE

P) a

nd a

dmin

-is

trat

ive

ener

gy

polic

y fo

r go

vern

-m

ent p

erso

nnel

No.

of

GO

F pe

rson

nel t

rain

ed o

n IE

P an

d en

ergy

pol

icy

each

yea

r st

artin

g ye

ar

2011

26

DO

E r

ecor

ds, t

rain

ing

asse

ss-

men

t and

trai

ning

pla

n do

cum

ent,

reco

rds

of

trai

ning

ses

sion

s, F

NU

and

U

SP a

nnua

l fac

ulty

rep

orts

, ce

rtifi

cate

s

Tra

inin

g in

stitu

tions

are

w

illin

g to

co-

oper

ate

with

go

vern

men

t, qu

alifi

ed

staf

f ca

n be

ret

aine

d w

ithin

the

ener

gy s

ecto

rPe

rcen

tage

trai

ned

GO

F pe

rson

nel t

hat a

re

activ

ely

enga

ged

in R

E-b

ased

pow

er

gene

ratio

n po

licy

mak

ing,

pla

nnin

g an

d im

plem

enta

tion,

ope

ratio

ns a

nd

eval

uatio

n by

EO

P

050

No.

of

trai

ning

inst

itutio

ns th

at a

re c

apab

le

and

qual

ified

in I

EP

and

ener

gy p

olic

y tr

aini

ng/c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

by E

OP

22

Out

put 4

.2: c

om-

plet

ed a

nd

appr

oved

Nat

iona

l E

lect

rific

atio

n M

aste

r Pl

an

Cab

inet

app

rove

d-E

lect

rific

atio

n M

aste

r pl

an0

Dec

2013

Mas

ter

plan

doc

umen

t, D

OE

w

ebpa

ge, D

OE

file

s, F

EA

an

nual

rep

ort,

DO

E e

nerg

y st

atis

tics

year

boo

k

The

goa

l of

100

% e

lect

rifi-

catio

n is

mai

ntai

ned

Ave

rage

ann

ual b

udge

t for

the

elec

trifi

ca-

tion

mas

ter

plan

by

EO

P, U

S$ m

illio

n0

10

a Min

imum

end

-of-

proj

ect C

O2 e

mis

sion

red

uctio

n fr

om d

emon

stra

tions

onl

y (3

.2 M

W V

RE

PP,

and

25

% o

f bi

ofue

l mill

s op

erat

iona

l by

EO

P)b O

bjec

tive

mon

itore

d qu

arte

rly

ER

BM

and

ann

ually

in p

roje

ct im

plem

enta

tion

revi

ewc C

onsi

deri

ng th

at F

SC a

nd T

ropi

k W

oods

are

not

ent

irel

y IP

Psd T

his

is m

inim

um, t

akin

g co

nsid

erat

ion

only

of

the

3.2

MW

VR

E b

iom

ass-

base

d po

wer

pla

nt a

nd 5

× 3

00 k

W d

iese

l eng

ines

usi

ng b

iodi

esel

pro

duce

d by

5

biof

uel m

ills

e Thi

s is

min

imum

, tak

ing

cons

ider

atio

n of

bas

elin

e R

E e

lect

rici

ty +

ele

ctri

city

gen

erat

ion

only

fro

m V

RE

bio

mas

s-ba

sed

PP a

nd 5

bio

dies

el p

ower

gen

era-

tion

units

f The

re w

ill b

e on

ly 1

sta

ndar

d te

mpl

ate

sinc

e th

ere

is o

nly

1 tr

ansm

issi

on a

nd d

istr

ibut

ion

utili

tyg Pr

ospe

ctiv

e pr

ivat

e R

E in

vest

ors

do n

ot c

omm

it fu

nds,

as

inve

stm

ents

are

com

mer

cial

ly n

ot v

iabl

e w

ithou

t sup

port

. Cou

ntry

X’s

ren

ewab

le e

nerg

y in

dust

ry

rem

ains

sm

all a

nd w

eak.

RE

inve

stm

ent r

emai

ns d

epen

dent

on

dono

r fu

ndin

g

Page 11: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

114 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

Field visit-monitoring and evaluation small grantees’ projects

Field Visit- Monitoring & Evaluation Small Grantees’ Projects

S. No. Information

1. Title of the project

2. Name of the lead grantee & address

3. Name & address of the partner organization(s)

4. Type of the Project

Desk Research

Training & capacity building

Information dissemination / outreach

Field/ Technology Demonstration

5. Project location

6. Start date of the project

7. End date of the project

8. A brief description of the project

9. Project milestones & time frame

S. No.

Milestone Date as per the contract

Actual Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

10. Project deliverables & time frame

S. No.

Deliverables Completion date as per

contract

Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

Page 12: Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted …978-81-322-1964...Annexure 1 Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Name Affiliation

115Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation

11. Key observations from the field visit

12. Major deviations, if any, from project scope, methodology, time frame

13. Challenges faced / problems encountered & strategy

14. Information dissemination / outreach activities for the project

15. Any assistance required from USAID/WI/WII

16. Document Set Type of report Number expected Number received

Monthly Reports

Quarterly Reports

Quarterly Financial Report

Closure/Final Reports