Comparison of Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 pledges under the Cancun Agreements
Annex-1 (1)
3
Riga Technical University Project: Development of Training Network for Improving Education in Energy Saving [ENERGY] Project number: 530379-TEMPUS-1-2012-1-LV-TEMPUS-JP http://energy.rtu.lv/en/content/about-project Version: 0.1 Annex 1 Training Evaluation Sheet for Students We are always keen to receive your views on the training we deliver. The feedback you give, allows us to continually adapt training to better suit your needs. We would appreciate it if you could spend a few minutes filling in this form before you leave (please hand it to the trainer when you’ve finished). All feedback will be treated in the strictest of confidence! Title of training course: ____ High Voltage Technique 2 _______________ Level of training course (Bachelor, Master):_______ Bachelor ________ Date: ___7.03.2015_____________ Name of Trainer(s): ______ Nebojša Arsić ________________________ Room: ____C3_____________ Faculty: ____ Faculty of Technical Sciences __________ Rate this course using the following scale: 5 - Strongly agree 4 - Partially agree 3 - Neutral assessment 2 - Partially disagree 1 - Strongly disagree Nr Questions Evaluation (1-5) No evaluati on 1 -
description
Aneks
Transcript of Annex-1 (1)
Projekta apraksts
Riga Technical University
Project: Development of Training Network for Improving Education in Energy Saving [ENERGY]
Project number: 530379-TEMPUS-1-2012-1-LV-TEMPUS-JP
http://energy.rtu.lv/en/content/about-project
Version: 0.1
Annex 1
Training Evaluation Sheet for Students
We are always keen to receive your views on the training we deliver. The feedback you give, allows us to continually adapt training to better suit your needs. We would appreciate it if you could spend a few minutes filling in this form before you leave (please hand it to the trainer when youve finished).
All feedback will be treated in the strictest of confidence!
Title of training course: ____ High Voltage Technique 2 _______________
Level of training course (Bachelor, Master):_______ Bachelor ________
Date: ___7.03.2015_____________
Name of Trainer(s): ______ Neboja Arsi ________________________
Room: ____C3_____________
Faculty: ____ Faculty of Technical Sciences __________
Rate this course using the following scale:
5 - Strongly agree
4 - Partially agree
3 - Neutral assessment
2 - Partially disagree
1 - Strongly disagree
NrQuestions Evaluation (1-5)No evaluation
1The introduction makes the students familiar with the subject content and way of the final control 4
2The course was well-structured and the themes were explained in a comprehensible manner 5
3During the course its theory is highly confirmed with practical tasks, activities or laboratory works 5
4This course and the other subjects mutually supplement each other 4
5Visual material is understandable and illustrate the material well enough 4
6The assignments and activities initiated self-sufficiency in decision making 4
7The tasks and activities promoted practical application of theory and creative thinking 4
8Recommended literature sources were accessible and helped in acquiring the course materials 5
9Lecture materials and course books are mutually complementary 4
What did you like in the course?
It is interesting that as we try to assess our work as faculty (for important to us matters such as tenure and promotion), we are asked to provide evidence of the quality of our teachingOutline 3 points you would like to take with you/have learnt in this session
Power System Regulation Energy in General
Electromagnetic Compatibility Do you have any suggestions for further improvement of the course? (If so, please give details and if you would like to be contacted about this idea please include your email address)
I dont have any suggestions-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you do not mind, please could you give us some additional more information about yourself?
Gender: MaleAge: 22-30 Status: Home Student
1 -
