Ann Palmer, M.A., M. Ed. Professor, Developmental Reading Richard Griffiths, PhD.
description
Transcript of Ann Palmer, M.A., M. Ed. Professor, Developmental Reading Richard Griffiths, PhD.
1
Reading-Writing-Serving Connection
College Reading and Learning Association
(CRLA) Conference, November 6-9, 2013
Ann Palmer, M.A., M. Ed.Professor, Developmental Reading
Richard Griffiths, PhD.Coordinator, Institutional Studies
Austin Community College, Austin, TX
ContentsI. Reading-writing connectionII. Reading-writing-serving
connectionIII. Service-learningIV. Service-learning and
retentionV. Works citedVI. ResourcesVII. Conclusions 2
I. Reading-writing connection
• Required by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)– Integrated Reading and Writing (IRW) – Comprehensive professional
development program—Jan.-Dec. 2013 -2014
– All upper/highest level offerings—spring 2015 (Dr. Morales-Vale, Director, Developmental Ed/Adult Basic Ed, Texas)
3
I. Reading-writing connection
• Research suggesting that integrated reading/writing courses are more efficient, for example:- Writing practices enhance students’
reading. (Graham S. & Herbert M. 2010)- Rates of retention, persistence and
success are higher for students who took the IRW courses than for those who took the unpaired courses.
(Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, 2002)
4
I. Reading-writing connection
• Research suggesting the need for a specific process for implementing IRW- Geon-Salter suggests following a 6 -
step progress (activation schema, annotation, rhetorical reading, self-reflection, rhetorical writing, mining the text) to make IRW successful.
(Geon-Salter S., 2012)5
I. Reading-writing connection
• Research suggests the need for specific guidelines to implement IRW.- Shanahan gives four guidelines: 1. Clearly specified outcomes2. Instruction in both reading and
writing3. Connections between different
disciplines4. Extensive practice in both reading
and writing (Shanahan, 1997)6
II. Reading-writing- serving connection
• Service learning can keep students engaged in school and on track to graduation. (Zaff and Lerner, 2010)
• Benefits of service learning programs appear to outweigh the liabilities.
(Perkins-Gough, 2009)
7
II. Reading-writing- serving connection
• Community-based participatory educational experiences can contribute to students’ academic performance and persistence.
• Positive correlations between service-learning and students’ intention to reenroll.
(Campus Compact, 2008)
8
II. Reading-writing- serving connection
• Service-learning…promotes deep. integrative learning and personal development among both first-year students and seniors.
(Gonyea et al., 2008)• Student engagement during the
first year yields powerful benefits for historically underserved students.
(Kuh et al, 2007 )9
10
III. Service - learning“Learning to serve, serving to
learn.”“Service-learning incorporates community work into the curriculum, giving students real-world learning experiences that enhance their academic learning while providing a tangible benefit for the community.”
(Campus Compact, 2013)
11
III. Service - learning (con’t)
Three basic components: 1. preparing
-setting objectives for skills to be learned or issues to consider-planning projects so they contribute to learning as volunteering takes place
12
III. Service - learning (con’t)
2. performing service and/or doing research on organizations that need volunteers
III. Service-learning (con’t)3) analyzing the experience using a
final project such as an essay or presentation
13
III. Service-Learning (con’t)
Sample S-L Project• This service learning project is worth 15% of
the student’s grade and involves the 5 parts. – Part 1 Learn about service learning at the
ACC service - learning website.
– Part 2 Learn about service learning opportunities on campus on the Student Life website and off-campus on the KUT and Volunteer Match websites.
14
III. Service Learning (con’t)
Sample S-L Project Part 3 Decide on your project. There are four different opportunities for service.1. Volunteer for 10 hours on campus.
2. Volunteer for 10 hours off campus with a non - profit organization. 3. Research 10 different non-profit community organizations. 4. Prepare a presentation on serving the
community.
15
III. Service Learning(con’t)Sample S-L Project
– Part 4 • Read two articles about service learning
found using the ACC Library online resources and write 5 questions and answers about the articles.
16
III. Service Learning(con’t)– Part 5
• Students volunteering on or off campus write a 1 -2 page essay describing their experiences.
• Students doing research write a 5-6 page essay on the non-profit organizations.
• Students who have developed a public service announcement will give an oral presentation to the class.
17
IV. Service - Learning and Retention
• Research conducted on service -learning in community colleges and universities shows advantages of this activity.
• Therefore, this retention study was undertaken.
18
IV. Service - learning and retention (con’t)
–study question“Does participating in service - learning encourage students to persist from the intermediate level developmental reading course to the college-credit course English 1301 at Austin Community College in one or two academic years?”
19
IV. Service - learning and retention (con’t)
Students included in study• those who completed a
developmental reading course (DEVR 0310)
• from fall 2009 through spring 2012
• earned a C or above in DEVR 0310• participated or didn’t participate
in service learning20
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
• ACC has 9 campuses with students that have different demographic characteristics.
• Service learning in a DEVR 0310 course was offered only at one campus.
21
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
22
Outcome Variables• Course Success and Withdrawal
Rates– Disaggregated by Gender and
Ethnicity• Retention (excluded summer
terms)– Disaggregated by Gender and
Ethnicity • Next-term • Second term
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
23
Outcome Variables• Completion of a college – level
course (English 1301 or 1302) with a C or above– Time period for completion
depended on the cohort’s completion of developmental reading course
– Included all English 1301 or English 1302 courses up to and including spring 2013
– Only the highest grade in either English 1301 or English 1302 included
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
Results• Course Withdrawal Rates in
Developmental Reading Course• Rate of withdrawals reduced to zero
across all six major ethnic/gender combinations for SL participants.
24
IV. Service - learning and retention (con’t)
Results• Course Withdrawal Rates in
Developmental Reading Course• WM SL vs. Non-SL (0.0% vs 22.3%)• BM SL vs Non-SL (0.0% vs 35.3%)• HM SL vs Non-SL (0.0% vs 22.3%)• WF SL vs Non-SL (0.0% vs 15.5%)• BF SL vs Non-SL (0.0% vs 23.1%)• HF SL vs Non-SL (0.0% vs 16.0%)
25
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
Results• Retention Next Term• Overall SL vs Non SL (79.38 vs 60.79)
• Disaggregated Gender/Ethnicity• WM SL vs Non-SL (100% vs 57.6%)• BM SL vs Non-SL (81.8% vs 46.8%)• HM SL vs Non-SL (83.3% vs 59.7%)• WF SL vs Non-SL (83.3% vs 76.4%)• BF SL vs Non-SL (69.7% vs 59.5%)• HF SL vs Non-SL (89.3% vs 63.0%)
26
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
Results• Retention Second Term• Overall SL vs Non SL (46.4 vs 35.8)• Disaggregated Gender/Ethnicity• WM SL vs Non-SL (100.0% vs 30.9%)• BM SL vs Non-SL (54.5% vs 29.5%)• HM SL vs Non-SL (33.3% vs 32.4%)• WF SL vs Non-SL (50.0% vs 44.6%)• BF SL vs Non-SL (45.5% vs 34.0%)• HF SL vs Non-SL (46.4% vs 41.3%)
27
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
• Retention Second Term• Overall SL vs Non SL (46.4 vs 35.8)
• English Credit Course • Overall SL vs Non SL (72.0% vs
62.0%)
28
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
Limitations & Discussion• Small sample size• Pre-selection bias
– Possibility that differences in motivation and other factors between SL and Non-SL
– More sophisticated methods should be used • propensity scoring – to match students
who participated in SL with those who did not and then compare the impact of SL
29
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
30
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
31
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
32
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
33
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
34
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
35
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
36
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
37
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
38
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
39
IV. Service - learning and retention(con’t)
40
V. Works cited• Academic Senate for California Community Colleges.
(2002). Sacramento. “A Survey Of Effective Practices In Basic Skills” ERIC. Web. 12 June 2013.
• Campus Compact (2008).”Building Engaged Campuses.” Research Brief #1 in Building Engaged Series. http://www.compact.org/wp-content/uploads/resources/downloads/Retention_Research_Brief.pdf
• Campus Compact.(2013) http://www.compact.org/about/history-mission-vision/
• Goen-Salter, S. (Producer). (2012). TxCRLA brown bag webinar: “Integrated reading and writing” (video). Retrieved from http://thetexasnetwork.org/index.php/resource-spec/1395/
41
V. Works cited (con’t)• Gonyea, R.M., et al (2008). High impact activities.
http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/AACU_2008_high_impact_practices%20Kuh,%20Gonyea,%20Nelson%20Laird,%20Kinzie%20final.pdf.
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation time to act report. New York, NY: Alliance for Excellent Education, Carnegie Foundation. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/WritingToRead_01.pdf
• Kuh, G.D., e tal. (2007). Connecting the dots. http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/Connecting_the_Dots_Report.pdf
42
V. Works cited (con’t)
• Morales-Vale, Suzanne. TSI and Developmental Education Updates. CRLA/CASP Convention. THECB Town Hall. November 8, 2012 PowerPoint.,18
• Perkins-Gogh, Deborah. (2009). “Can Service Learning Keep Students in School?” Educational Leadership, 66(8),91-93.
• Shanahan, T. (1997). “Reading-writing relationships, thematic units, inquiry learning.... In pursuit of effective integrated literacy instruction.” Reading Teacher, 51(1), 12-19.
• Zaff, Jonathan and Richard Lerner. (2010)“Promote Positive Youth Development in High School.” Phi Delta Kappan, 91(5), 21-23.
43
VI. ResourcesCampus Compact
• helps colleges and universities coordinate community engagement efforts
• trains faculty members to integrate community work into their teaching and research,
• encourages scholarships and other student incentives.
Campus Compact/ 201344
VI. Resources (con’t)National Service Learning
Clearinghouse
• supports the service-learning community in higher education, kindergarten through grade twelve, community-based organizations, tribal programs, and others interested in strengthening schools and communities using service-learning.
http://servicelearning.org 45
46
VI. Resources (con’t)
College & Research Libraries News
• provides information on the definitions of civic engagement, projects and resource centers, campus and research centers, e-journals and blogs, statistics and assessment
http://crln.acrl.org/content/67/1/23.full.pdf+html?sid=d3926001-cf73-42d0-b0fc-4082e672df21
VI. Resources (con’t)• Community College National
Center for Community Engagementprovides resources to support and advance civic engagement initiatives in community colleges, sample syllabi; announcements of upcoming events and conferences; and links to related programs, projects, and organizations.
http://mc.maricopa.edu/other/engagement/47
VI. Resources (con’t)
• Service Learning Research Primerdesigned to address the need for information on how to conduct high-quality and rigorous research on service-learning. It reviews the literature base, appropriate research methodologies and measurement procedures, and available online resources.
http://www.servicelearning.org/service-learning-research-primer/service-learning-research-primer
48
49
VII. Conclusions • Most students learn best by doing!
• Students with learning disabilities need the multisensory reinforcement.
VII. Conclusions (con’t)
50
• According to this research, students benefit academically from integrated reading, writing and service - learning.
VII. Conclusions (con’t)• Specifically most students who did
service learning with both reading and writing in the intermediate-level developmental reading class persisted and were successful in the first or second required college - level English course.
51
Copies and thank you!• If you have questions or would like
a copy of this presentation, please email Ann Palmer – [email protected].
• I would like to thank Richard Griffiths [email protected] for his generous assistance in preparing the statistical analysis of the data.
• It’s been a pleasure visiting with you!
52