Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002
description
Transcript of Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002
Covad Confidential
Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective
Anjali Joshi
EVP, Engineering
July 2002
2
Covad Confidential
• Covad Today
• Technology strategy
• Impact of Policy Issues
• What needs to be done to promote healthy competition
Today’s Discussion
Covad Confidential
Covad Today
4
Covad Confidential
Covad’s Business
National Broadband Services Provider
What We Do Today: Provide the Largest Broadband Internet
Access and Services Network
Technology Base: DSL
Profile : About 360,000 customers
Who We Sell To: Small/Med. Bus., Enterprises, Consumers
Who We Sell Through: Internet Service Providers
Enterprises
Direct
Business Model: Monthly Recurring Access & Service Revenues
5
Covad Confidential
TeleSoHo
TeleSurfer
Customer Segmentation Product Offering
Incr
ease
d M
arg
in C
on
trib
uti
on
Broad Portfolio of Offerings
TeleXtend
TeleSpeed
Managed Security/VPNs
Voice Solutions
Households ~100 mm
SMBs~8 mm
Enterprise
SoHo Market~37 mm
Potential Subscriber Base
Biz Cons Biz
TeleLink
6
Covad Confidential
• One National Network vs. Multiple Regional Networks• Over 99.99% Network Reliability• Over 3.5 million subscriber capacity
Only National DSL Network
7
Covad Confidential
Source: Forrester Research estimates and company research
ConsumersConsumers SMBsSMBs
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20050
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
# of SmallBusinesses
SMB DSLLines
• 2001 Growth: 94%• 2002E Growth: 53%• 5-Year CAGR: 47%
• 8 million SMBs• 60% still have dial-up
GR
OW
TH
P
OT
EN
TIA
L
SMBw/ Dial-up
47% CAGR
Market Opportunity is SignificantLines (MM)
8
Covad Confidential
• Sell business services aggressively through both wholesale & direct channels
• Strong effort to grow business direct channel - telesales, Websales, Field Sales
• Consumer channel efforts focused on primarily large wholesale ISPs - e.g ELNK
Consumer Business
Dire
ct
W
hole
sale
Price Sensitivity Product Focus
Channel Strategy
Covad Confidential
Technology Strategy
10
Covad Confidential
Layers of Network Capabilities
11
Covad Confidential
ISP
ISP...
ATMSwitch
Router
CO
CO
DSLAM
CO
DSLAM
ATMSwitch
DSLAM
Router
ISPATM
Switch Router
Internet
Covad Network Architecture
12
Covad Confidential
VirtualISP
ISP
Em ailW ebHost
ISP
ISP...
ATMSwitch
Router
CO
CO
DSLAM
CO
DSLAM
ATMSwitch
DSLAM
Router
ISPATM
Switch Router
Internet
ISP
ISP...
ATMSwitch
Router
CO
CO
DSLAM
CO
DSLAM
ATMSwitch
DSLAM
Router
ISPATM
Switch Router
Internet
Em ailW ebHost
Covad DSL+IP
13
Covad Confidential
ISP
ISP...
ATMSwitch
Router
CO
CO
DSLAM
CO
DSLAM
ATMSwitch
DSLAM
Router
ISPATM
Switch Router
Internet
PSTN
VoiceGateway
ISP/CLEC
Covad Voice over DSL
14
Covad Confidential
End UserEnd UserEnd UserEnd UserCLEC / CLEC / Service Service ProviderProvider
CLEC / CLEC / Service Service ProviderProvider
ISPISP
ASPsASPs
RetailRetail
OtherOther
IXCIXC
VerizonVerizon
QwestQwest
US WestUS West
SBCSBC
Bell South
The DSL Supply Chain
• Confusion on DSL availability
• Difficulty in ordering• Long install cycles
• Complex coordination Issues
• Difficulty in managing multiple RBOCs
•No upstream visibility•Inefficient manual processes•Difficult product to manage
15
Covad Confidential
End UserEnd UserEnd UserEnd UserCLEC / CLEC / Service Service ProviderProvider
CLEC / CLEC / Service Service ProviderProvider
ISPISP
ASPsASPs
RetailRetail
OtherOther
IXCIXC
VerizonVerizon
QwestQwest
US WestUS West
SBCSBC
Bell South
Systems Strategy
OSS ARCHITECTUREAchieve completely automated, flexible & integrated Business Process flow
OPEN, FLEXIBLE APIseamless links with all partners, standard B2B interfaces and co-branded websites.
OSS EDI LINKSEnsure timely & efficient provisioning of loops from ILEC suppliers by building EDI interfaces with their legacy systems
16
Covad Confidential
Benefitsto Partners
Benefitsto Partners
Benefitsto Users
Benefitsto Users
• Automated order management, line provisioning
• Full suite of services
• Network Visibility
• Ease of installation
• Reliability of service
• Superior customer support
Operating Improvements:
Consumer Interval
Business Interval
Consumer Self-installation
1Q 01 1Q02
< 25 days < 10 days
< 30 days < 20 days
64 % virtually all
Automated OSS and Provisioning
Covad Confidential
Regulatory and Policy Issues
18
Covad Confidential
The Logic Behind the 1996 Act
The Problem: How do you entice a monopoly to “give up” a dominant market position?• Entry into local market requires cooperation of incumbent
local telephone company• Absent a “carrot”, local telephone company has “nothing to
gain and everything to lose” by cooperating
Congress’s Solution• Enforceable interconnection and unbundled access• Provide carrot of long-distance entry
19
Covad Confidential
Why Unbundle?
• Removing legal barriers not enough to foster competition• Local telephone companies enjoyed 60+ years of
guaranteed monopoly status• New entrants cannot achieve these economies• Congress decided that phone companies needed
to share economies with entrants
• Result: Section 251 requires telephone companies to lease parts of their network• Competitors pay for access• Negotiated and arbitrated interconnection
agreements
20
Covad Confidential
Unbundling the Local Network
NetworkInterfaceDevice(NID)
Drop
FeederDistributionInterface(FDI)
Feeder
CentralOffice
CLECCollocatedEquipment
To Tandemsand IXCNetworks
“Unbundled Local Loop”
Unbundled Pursuantto FCC Regulations
March Collocation Order
Copper Copper
Fiber
“UnbundledTransport”(DS3, OCx)
21
Covad Confidential
The 1996 Act in Context
Home
Office
COSwitch Tandem
Switch
TandemSwitch
TandemSwitch
Long-Distance
POP
1984 AT&TDivestiture
1996 Act:UnbundledNetwork Elements
22
Covad Confidential
Elements ILECs Control that We Need
• Local loops -- the copper wire to your home
• High frequency portion of loop -- line sharing
• Collocation -- how we connect to the copper
• Transport -- links collocations and customers
• Operational Support Systems -- loop quality, ordering, provisioning, maintenance
23
Covad Confidential
Key FCC Decisions Implementing the Act• First Local Competition Order (8 August 1996)
http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/local_competition/fcc96325.html
• Collocation and unbundling rules--includes DSL loops• Immediately challenged by local telephone companies; only fully
reinstated in January 1999• Collocation Order (31 March 1999)
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf
• Cageless collocation, switching equipment, non-discriminatory safety standards
• UNE Remand Order (5 November 1999)http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
• Access to loop information• Required by Supreme Court decision
• Line Sharing Order (9 December 1999)http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc
• Effective June 6, 2000• Spectrum management standards
24
Covad Confidential
Regulatory Environment today
• Tauzin-Dingell etc have created confusion• FCC Chairman has created fear, uncertainty and
doubt• Some high-tech companies have lobbied in favor of
RBOCs, anti-competitive positions• DC Circuit Court has cast a cloud over all UNEs on
grounds contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court• FCC still remains supportive of the 1996 Act• US Supreme Court strongly supportive of FCC
25
Covad Confidential
What do we need?• Hold the 1996 Telecommunications Act stable
• Monitor and enforce the rules stringently
• FCC should not change the rules on unbundling
• Structural separation would promote better use of copper assets and development of loop plant