Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation
description
Transcript of Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation
![Page 1: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
11
Angular resolution study Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulationGLD detector simulation
2007/Feb/52007/Feb/5
ACFA ILC WorkshopACFA ILC Workshop
M1 ICEPP, TokyoM1 ICEPP, Tokyo
Hitoshi HANOHitoshi HANO
On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J GroupOn behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group
![Page 2: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Contents
Introduction Angular Resolution Study
Position Resolution of ECAL cluster Direction of Reconstructed gamma
Calorimeter Component DependenceCell size DependenceMaterial Dependence
Summary
![Page 3: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Motivation and PFA Analysis
G~~ 0
1
Measurement of the direction of non-pointing photon is important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.
To identify a non-pointing photon, we need to know angular resolution of the detector (EM Calorimeter).
We have studied angular resolution using full-simulator (Jupiter)
35 10~10 [m]
decay length :
ECAL
IP G~
01~
G~
01~
In this study, we have used single-gamma coming from IP to evaluate angular resolution.
![Page 4: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
GLD Detector Geometry in Jupiter• GLD detector has large-radius and fine-segmented Calorimeter.
It’s important to optimize
Cost vs.
Physics Performance.
R [m] Z [m]
ECAL2.1-2.3
0.4-2.3
0-2.8
2.8-3.0
Structure
W/Scinti./gap3/2/1(mm) x 33 layers cell size 1x1(cm2)
ECAL geometry in Jupiter :
barrel
endcap
Calorimeter cell sizeand absorber material
can be changed.
![Page 5: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
IP (generated point)
1. Clustering
2. Find an energy-weighted central point of each layer
3. Fit each point with least-square method
4. Evaluate an angle between gamma-line and reconstructed gamma
Method of Gamma Reconstruction
γ
reconstructed gamma
Calorimeter
![Page 6: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Angular Resolution Study
~ Position Resolution of Cluster ~
![Page 7: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Method (position resolution study of aaaaaaa isolated gamma cluster)
1. Generate single-gamma from IP with random direction
2. Clustering (more details in next page)
3. Search energy-weighted central point of cluster
4. Evaluate θ, φ of a central point
5. Compare with MC truth
θ ( φ ) resolution [rad] = θ ( φ ) meas – θ( φ ) MC
central point
γIP
(generated point)
ECAL
clustering
(θ,φ)
![Page 8: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Clustering Method
1. Find the highest energy deposit cell
2. Make a cone around the cell
3. Define cells which are inside of the cone as one cluster (around all layers)
4. Find energy-weighted central point
clustering angle = 10°γ@10GeV
IP (generated point)
highest energy deposit cell
central point
![Page 9: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Position Resolution of Cluster (cell : 1 cm)
|cos(θ)| |cos(θ)|
σ [
mra
d]
σ [
mra
d]
barrel endcapendcap barrel
1 GeV2 GeV5 GeV
10 GeV
θ resolution is better for larger cos(θ)
φ resolution is worse for larger cos(θ)
IP (generated point)
ECAL geometrical effect
Position resolution : ~0.1 [cm]gamma@10GeV
![Page 10: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Energy Dependent Result of position resolution
15.091.0
E
22.081.0
E
θ barrel :
θ endcap :
09.008.1
E
23.078.1
E
φ barrel :
φ endcap
:
[mrad]
[mrad]
[mrad]
[mrad]
1/√E 1/√E
σ [
mra
d]
σ [
mra
d]
10GeV
1GeV
2GeV
5GeV
![Page 11: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Angular Resolution Study
~ Direction of Reconstructed gamma ~
![Page 12: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
IP (shot point)
1. Clustering
2. Find an energy-weighted central point of each layer
3. Fit each point with least-square method
4. Evaluate an angle between gamma-line and reconstructed gamma
Method (angular resolution study of reconstructed gamma)
γ
reconstructed gamma
Calorimeter
![Page 13: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
anglepeakr peakr
Histogram and Angular Resolution
fitting function )12
exp(**02
2
p
xxp r histogram F(r)
σ = 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad]
)(*)( rfrrF
)2
exp(*)(2
2
r
Arf
IP central point of cluster
r
d
r d
γ
reconstructed gamma
angle [rad] = r/d
gamma@10GeV
![Page 14: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Energy Dependence (1,2,5,10,50GeV)
Eangle
125 [mrad]
Average over full acceptance
1GeV2GeV
5GeV10GeV
50GeV
1/√E
σ [
mra
d]
![Page 15: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Shoot from IP
Shoot from another point gamma@10GeV
IP
ECAL
Shoot from x=y=20cm, z=0
σ= 48.3±0.3[mrad]
IP
ECAL
σ= 48.6±0.3[mrad]
If gamma has been shot from another position, we could not observe significant
difference.
reconstructed gamma
![Page 16: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Calorimeter Component Dependence
![Page 17: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Structure (cell size dependence)
Absorbercell size
[cm]X0
Energy Resolution
W[3mm] 0.5~10 28 14.8%
gamma : E = 10GeV
How about cell size dependence?
33 layers
![Page 18: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Cell size dependence
1 [cm] : 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad] 0.5 [cm] : 46.4 ± 0.3 [mrad]
gamma @10GeV
<5%
We could not observe significant improvement from 1cm to 0.5cm
![Page 19: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Structure (energy dependence)
Absorbercell size
[cm]X0
Energy Resolution
W[3mm] 0.5~2 28 14.8%
gamma : E = 1~10GeV
How about energy dependence between 1cm and 0.5cm?
33 layers
![Page 20: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Energy Dependence (1,2,5,10GeV)
1GeV
2GeV
5GeV
10GeV
No significant difference has been observed between 1cm and 0.5cm around all of energy.
![Page 21: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Absorbercell size
[cm]X0
Energy Resolution
W [3mm] 0.5~2 28 14.8%
Pb [4.8mm] 0.5~2 28 15.0%
Pb [3mm] 0.5~2 22 10.5%
Structure (Absorber dependence)gamma : E = 10GeV
How about absorber dependence?
33 layers
![Page 22: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Absorber Dependence (Tungsten, Lead)
@1x1 [cm]
Lead[4.8mm]
Tungsten[3mm]
Tungsten [3mm] : 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad] Lead [4.8mm] : 45.5 ± 0.3 [mrad]
Lead[3mm]
Same total radiation length
Angular resolution with Lead is better than Tungsten
![Page 23: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Hit Distribution
depth
depth
gamma MC
gamma MC
reconstructed gamma
reconstructed gamma
Angular resolution is better than Tungsten, since shower length is
longer in Lead
gamma @10GeV
Tungsten [3mm]
Lead [4.8mm]
Angular resolution
48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad]
45.5 ± 0.3 [mrad]
Energy Resolution
14.8% 15.0%
![Page 24: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Angular resolution of default-GLD Calorimeter (W:1cm)The angular resolution is estimated to be 125mrad/
√(E/GeV) Dependence on cell size granularity and materi
al dependence (W, Pb) has been studiedNo significant difference has been observed betwee
n 1cm and 0.5cmLead is better than Tungsten for isolated gammaEnergy resolution is sameHow about energy resolution for jet ?
Summary
Next speakerT.Yoshioka
![Page 25: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Backup
![Page 26: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Fitting methodFind a central point of each layer by energy weighted mean
x
y
weighted by energy deposit
Fitting 2-dimentions (x-y)
y’
z
y’
Fitting new 2-dimentions (y’-z)
Distance[cm]
![Page 27: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Hitting distribution and Average
gamma@10GeV Hit cell numberLayer number of
central pointEnergy
Resolution
Tungsten 252 5.7 14.8%
Lead 284 5.6 15.0%
![Page 28: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Hit Distribution
depth depth
gamma MC
gamma MC
reconstructed gamma
reconstructed gamma
Angular resolution is better than Tungsten, since Lead has geometrical deeper distribution.
gamma@10GeV Angular Resolution Energy Resolution
Tungsten [3mm] 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad] 14.8%
Lead [4.8mm] 45.5 ± 0.3 [mrad] 15.0%
![Page 29: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
![Page 30: Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815578550346895dc3408b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30