ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications...

10
ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

Transcript of ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications...

Page 1: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Possible Architectures And

External Interface Specifications

Presented to Program Office

16 SEP 04(Team 3)

Page 2: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Mission Needs Statement

• Needs– Sea-based precision strike cell (FPSC)– Communication between FPSC and all NATO

air assets– Multi-path communication network– Integration with MASSTIC– Damage assessment capability

Page 3: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture One

Precision StrikeCell

«extends»

Planning

«extends»

Tasking

«extends»

ControlSupport

«extends»

CAOC

«extends»

«uses»

Air Operations

«extends»«extends» «extends»

OffenseSupport

Defense

Administration

Supply andLogistics

Current Ops

Future Ops

*

*

Strike Forces at Sea

Strike Forces Ashore

«uses»

«uses»

- End1

*-End2

*

Intelligence«uses»

Aerial RefuelingSOF / Targeting

Lasing Teams

C4 ISR Capabilities

«uses»

«uses»

«extends»

Comm SystemsInterfaces

- End3

*

- End4

*

AAA Capabilities

Page 4: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture OneAdvantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages– Fits existing ATO structure– Ample manning to meet requirements– Centralized functionality – “it’s all here”

• Disadvantages– Large footprint: extensive manning, square

footage, administrative requirements– Centralized functionality does not enhance

network-centric warfare

Page 5: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture TwoDATA SYSTEMS:

- SIPRNET

-NIPRNET

-CWAN

-Link 11

-Link 16

-VoIP Telephones

-GCCS

Voice Systems:

-VHF Nets

-HF Nets

-UHF Nets

-Multi Channel

Voice

Air, Ground, Human, and Sig Intel

Database mngtTarget acquisitionBDA

Joint and Coalition Assets

Precision StrikeCell

«extends»

Planning

«extends»

Tasking

«extends»

ControlSupport

«extends»

CAOC

«extends»

«uses»

Air Operations

«extends»«extends» «extends»

Offense

SupportDefense

Communications

Satellite Systems

Multiplexers«uses»

Data Systems

VTC

DSN

Page 6: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture TwoAdvantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages– Smaller footprint: easier to meet manning, square

footage, administrative requirements– Enables real-time task-to-target-kill loop– Emphasizes connectivity and network-centric warfare– Easier to upgrade

• Disadvantages– Does not fit in well with existing ATO planning

process – possibly too responsive– FPSC may become task-saturated earlier than in

other architectures– Very reliant on rest of network

Page 7: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture ThreeBy Function

AdministrationLegal Advisors•2 Secret VoIP Phones•2 SIPR seats•2 NIPR seats•2 Tables•3 Chairs

Intelligence:

Officers:•3 Air Int•2 Hum Int•3 Sig IntEquipment:3 JWICCS3 SIPR2 TS MSG2 NIPR2 STU III3 SIPR VoIP3 Tables6 chairs

Operations:Officers: Battle CAPT•3 Air Ops•3 SWOsOps ChfOps ClrkEquipment:3 SIPR2 TS MSG2 NIPR2 STU III3 SIPR VoIP3 Tables6 chairs

Supply and Logistics:Officers:•Aviation Supply•Naval Logistics•Equipment:•2 SIPR VoIP Phones•2 NIPR seats•1 Table •1 Chair

Public Affairs and Future Ops•PAO•C3 Rep•Fut Ops Chf•Clrk•2 SIPR seats•2 SIPR VoIP Phones

Comms:3 Comm O’s-3 SIPR seats-2 NIPR seats-1 VTC -3 Tables-4 Chairs-Projector-Screen-3 SIPR VoIP Phones-1 Red Phone-Interface for all Comm Systems-Helpdesk-Network Supt

CAOC

FPSC

C1

C2

C3 C4

COXO

C5

C6

Page 8: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Architecture ThreeAdvantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages– Clear division of responsibilities and functions– Ample manning for contingencies– Centralized functionality

• Disadvantages– Structure potentially rigid and unresponsive to

evolving needs– More difficult to upgrade systems or organization– Substantial admin, manning and square footage

requirements

Page 9: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

• Systems Interfaces:– Navy’s Maritime ACCS Ship/Shore Tactical Interface

Component (MASSTIC)– Air Force’s Integrated Air Defense Command (IADC)– Army’s Air Operations Coordination Center (AOCC)– RPC net for real-time Radar Air Picture (RAP)– DISN Services– Battlefield Information, Collection, and Exploitation System

(BICES)

• Open systems architecture• Interoperability with legacy systems• Interoperability with Coalition Systems

Page 10: ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE! Possible Architectures And External Interface Specifications Presented to Program Office 16 SEP 04 (Team 3)

ANGELFIRE… PROVEN PERFORMANCE!

Questions?