Anatomy of a lava dome using muon radiography and electrical resistivity tomography Jean-François...
-
Upload
edmund-heath -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Anatomy of a lava dome using muon radiography and electrical resistivity tomography Jean-François...
Anatomy of a lava dome using muon Anatomy of a lava dome using muon radiography and electrical resistivity radiography and electrical resistivity
tomographytomography
http://www.tomuvol.fr/
Jean-François LÉNAT on behalf of the TOMUVOL Collaboration
Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceFranceInstitut de Physique NucléaireInstitut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, France de Lyon, France
Origin-nature of the muons
Primary cosmic rays striking the atmospheric atoms and molecules
High-energy collisions new secondary particles are produced, among them muons (unitary negative electric charge, 207 times the mass of an electron)
and anti-muons.
About 10000 muons/minute per square meter at the surface of the Earth
Intro
From Tang et al., Phys. Rev. D74, 053007 (2006)
Energy spectrum of muons obtained from a compilation of
experimental data.
Muons arriving in the horizontal direction have a higher intensity at energies above a few 100 GeV
Because muons become more penetrative as their energy increases, near horizontal muons can be used for radiographic scanning
They can penetrate into the earth if their initial energy is sufficiently high
Flux reasonably high to keep detectors to a reasonable size for
geological applications
Intro
Intro
At the detector location, an object (e.g. a volcano) is illuminated by muons from all the directions
The opacity of the object is determined by comparing the flux crossing the object and a modeled or measured incident flux in open sky conditions.
The attenuation of the flux of muons depends on the density and size of an object along the muon trajectories
copyright by Tom Tam
Intro
If the shape of the object is known (e.g. DEM for a volcano), the average density along the muons path can be determined (radiography).
Tanaka et al., 2007
With acquisitions from different locations 3D reconstruction of density distribution (tomography).
Pioneer studies in muons radiography by :
• Alvarez et al.,1970, Chephren pyramid• Nagamine et al. 1995, Tanaka et al. 2001, Volcanoes• Borozdin et al. 2003 muon scattering radiography to detect uranium/plutonium contraband in trucks• Jenneson, 2004, Large vessel imaging
and ongoing projects in different areas:
• Volcanoes• Faults• Tunnels• Minerals deposits•…
Intro
TOMUVOL presentation
TOMUVOL (Tomographie muonique des volcans = volcano muons tomography) project started in 2010.
A collaboration between particle physicists and volcanologists from Clermont-Ferrand and Lyon (France)
Detectors derived from equipments developed for high energy physics and cosmic particles studies.
TOMUVOL presentation
The aim of TOMUVOL is to :
• Develop muon tomography of volcanoes
• Develop joint interpretations of muons and other geophysical data (gravity, electrical resistivity, …)
• Develop portable muons stations to study and monitor active volcanoes
Ongoing experiment on Puy de DômePuy de Dôme presentation
A 11 ka old trachyte dome in a young volcanic chain (the Chaine des Puys) 10 km to the West of the city of
Clermont-Ferrand (France)
The dome is about 400 m high and 1.8 km wide at its base
Interpreted as a composite dome by geologists
Photo © Daniel Massacrier Ville de Clermont-Ferrand
Puy de Dôme presentation
The Puy de Dôme has been selected as an experimental site for the Tomuvol project for:
• Proximity with the labs in Clermont-Ferrand• Good accessibility• Possibility to install the experimental equipments in existing shelters with electric power
In addition to the muon data, the following geophysical data are (or will be) available :
• 2D electrical resistivity profiles• High resolution gravity map
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
Milestones 2011:Jan. - July: Muon detector at Grotte TaillerieMay: Electrical resistivity measurement Dec: Muon detector at Col de Ceyssat
Milestones 2011:Jan. - July: Muon detector at Grotte TaillerieMay: Electrical resistivity measurement Dec: Muon detector at Col de Ceyssat
Col de CeyssatCol de Ceyssat(1074 m)
107 deg
Grotte TaillerieGrotte Taillerie(867 m)(867 m)
2 km
1.2 km
Puy de DômePuy de Dôme(1465 m)
From a Lidar survey in March 2011. Accuracy better than 10 cm, 0.5 m grid size
High resolution Digital Elevation Model
Puy de Dôme
Taillerie
Col de Ceyssat
The detectors (CALICE GRPC’s)
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
Glass Resistive Plate Chamber
Gas: 93% forane, 5% isobutane, 2% SF6; 1 l/hPCB :Printed Circuit Boards
9142 readout channels per m2
HV~ 7.5kV
insulation
glassgraphite
PCB
copper plates 1cm2 Glass Resistive Plate Chamber
gasm
uon1 mm
A charged particle ionizes the gas high electric field amplifies this ionization by producing charge cascades, which in turn induce charge signals on the copper plates
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
The muons telescope is composed of 3 planes of GRPC.
The electronic part provides the location of the impacts (1 cm2 pixels).
This allows to reconstruct the muons trajectories.
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
Positioning of the device by GPS and land surveying accuracy better than 5 mm
Remote detector control and data transfer through a WIFI link
Alignment of the planes checked by minimizing the sum of the individual-track 2s against variations in the alignment parameters.
Simulated event rates for a density of 1.6 g/cm3
Path length of the atmospheric muons across the Puy de Dôme volcano in the direction of the detector
indicates that the interior of Puy de Dôme is accessible for muon imaging with an 1 m2 large detector
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
Experiments in different phases:
• Phase 1. January to April 2011 : two 1m2 chambers + one 1/6 m2 chamber, telescope extension: ~50cm • Phase 2. three more weeks : three 1m2 chambers, telescope extension: ~50cm • Phase 3. until July 2011 : two 1m2 chambers + one 0.16m2 chamber, telescope extension: 1m
x
y
z
O
Track reconstruction Clusterise the coincident (0.4 µs) hits in the
three chambers Analytically minimise χ2 w.r.t. 4 track
parameters using the 3 cluster barycentres
Position resolution : 0.4 cm; Angular resolution : better than 0.5° in both and during the first two phases. Angular resolution improved by about a factor 2 for the 1 m-long setups (phase 3).
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
Muons experiment at Puy de Dôme
21 Jan – 6 April 2011 (65.9 days)(0.16 m2, 0.5 m telescope)
Tomuvol Preliminary
12 May- 1 July 2011 (46 days)(0.16 m2, 1 m telescope)
Tomuvol Preliminary
14 April- 12May 2011 (18 days)(1 m2, 1 m telescope)
Tomuvol Preliminary
Datasets (muon shadows) currently analyzed to derive average density along the muons path across the dome
Resistivity experiment at Puy de Dôme
2 D Electrical Resistivity Tomography carried out with a multi-electrodes (64) equipment (ABEM)
A 2205 m long south-north profile with 35 m electrode spacing
More detailed south-north and west-east profiles in the summit area (electrode spacing 5 m)
Combination of Wenner a and Schlumberger soundings to ensure good signal and good data coverage
Resistivity experiment at Puy de Dôme
Preliminary resistivity model along a south-north profile, showing the
heterogeneous internal structure of the composite lava dome
Resistivity experiment at Puy de Dôme
Preliminary geological interpretation of the resistivity model along a south-north profile.
Resistivity experiment at Puy de Dôme
A complete interpretation of the internal structure of the dome will be carried out using :
• Two muon datasets acquired from different points of view (one acquired in 2011 and the second one starting in December 2011)
• Two long south-north (made in 2011) and west-east (to be carried out in 2012) resistivity profiles
• A high resolution gravity survey (to be carried out in 2012)
This experiment aims to :
(1) Develop the study of volcanoes using muon techniques
(2) To improve the study of the interior of volcanoes using joint interpretation of several types of geophysical data