Analysis of statistics 2011 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics...

Analysis of statistics 2011

January 2012

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2011 2/60

Table of contents Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2011 ................................................................ 4

A. Number of new applications ........................................................................... 4 B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications................................. 4 C. Processing of applications .............................................................................. 4

1. Pre-allocation ........................................................................................... 4 2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions........................................................... 4 3. Communicated applications ........................................................................ 4 4. Judgments............................................................................................... 4 5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ........................ 5

D. Priority policy ............................................................................................... 5 General information.............................................................................................. 6

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ......................................... 7 Processing of applications .................................................................................. 9

Country-specific information ................................................................................ 14 Albania ......................................................................................................... 14 Andorra ........................................................................................................ 15 Armenia........................................................................................................ 16 Austria.......................................................................................................... 17 Azerbaijan..................................................................................................... 18 Belgium ........................................................................................................ 19 Bosnia and Herzegovina .................................................................................. 20 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................ 21 Croatia ......................................................................................................... 22 Cyprus.......................................................................................................... 23 Czech Republic............................................................................................... 24 Denmark....................................................................................................... 25 Estonia ......................................................................................................... 26 Finland ......................................................................................................... 27 France .......................................................................................................... 28 Georgia......................................................................................................... 29 Germany....................................................................................................... 30 Greece.......................................................................................................... 31 Hungary........................................................................................................ 32 Iceland ......................................................................................................... 33 Ireland ......................................................................................................... 34 Italy ............................................................................................................. 35 Latvia ........................................................................................................... 36



Liechtenstein ................................................................................................. 37 Lithuania....................................................................................................... 38 Luxembourg .................................................................................................. 39 Malta............................................................................................................ 40 Republic of Moldova........................................................................................ 41 Monaco......................................................................................................... 42 Montenegro ................................................................................................... 43 Netherlands................................................................................................... 44 Norway......................................................................................................... 45 Poland .......................................................................................................... 46 Portugal ........................................................................................................ 47 Romania ....................................................................................................... 48 Russia .......................................................................................................... 49 San Marino.................................................................................................... 50 Serbia .......................................................................................................... 51 Slovakia........................................................................................................ 52 Slovenia........................................................................................................ 53 Spain............................................................................................................ 54 Sweden ........................................................................................................ 55 Switzerland ................................................................................................... 56 “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”..................................................... 57 Turkey.......................................................................................................... 58 Ukraine......................................................................................................... 59 United Kingdom ............................................................................................. 60



Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2011

A. Number of new applications In 2011 64,500 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall increase of 5% compared with 2010 (61,300). 47,300 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (an increase of 11% in relation to 2010). 17,200 were identified as Chamber or Committee1 cases (a decrease of 9%).

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications 52,188 applications were disposed of judicially, an increase of 27% in relation to 2010 (41,182). However, the annual deficit, the difference between cases allocated and cases disposed of, was approximately 12,300 (i.e. a monthly deficit of more than 1,000). As a result the number of applications pending before a judicial formation rose by 9% in 2011, from 139,650 to 151,600. However since the 31 August 2011, where the number of pending applications reached a total of 160,200, it has decreased by 5%.

C. Processing of applications

1. Pre-allocation

Before a case is allocated to a judicial formation applicants are required to complete the application form and submit the necessary supporting documents on pain of administrative disposal. As at 31 December 2011 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 22,600, an increase of 3% in relation to the same date the previous year (21,950). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2011 was 13,400, an increase of 14%.

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions

In 2011 50,677 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 31% increase compared with 2010 (38,575). The Single-Judge formation decided 46,930 cases in 2011. The number of strike out decisions following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration increased by 25% in 2011 (1,518).

3. Communicated applications

Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent Government. In 2011 5,359 applications were communicated (a decrease of 20% in relation to 2010 when 6,674 applications were communicated). This figure reflects a decrease in the number of repetitive cases processed in accordance with the Court’s policy of concentrating more resources on more complex cases.

4. Judgments

Judgments were delivered in respect of 1,511 applications (compared with 2,607 in 2010 – a decrease of 42%). A number of these applications were joined with the result that

1 Committee competence provided for in Article 28 § 1 b) of the Convention.



the number of judgments actually delivered was 1,157, a decrease of 23%. 269 judgments were adopted by a three-judge formation under the new procedure introduced by Protocol 14. The decrease in the number of judgments can be explained mainly by the fact that fewer applications belonging to Category V (repetitive cases) have been processed this year.

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)

The total number of decisions on interim measures (2,773) decreased by 27% compared with 2010 (3,775). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 342 cases (a decrease of 76% compared with 2010) and dismissed them in 1,807 cases (5% less than in 2010). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court but nonetheless required an urgent examination.

D. Priority policy2

In June 2009 the Court adopted a new priority policy establishing seven different categories. The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases. It was recognised at the outset that a probable consequence of the policy would be a drop in output of applications decided on their merits as resources were diverted away from straightforward repetitive cases to these more complex and time-consuming cases. As noted above (see C. 4) this largely explains the lower number of applications disposed of in judgments overall in 2011. The number of applications in the first three categories (“priority applications”) dealt with in 2011 increased globally by 5% compared to 2010. 12% more priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison to 2010. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee increased by 7%. In particular the number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration rose from 40 in 2010 to 146 in 2011. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment decreased by 17% in 2011. However, the number of priority applications decided by a judgment represented 27% of the total number of applications dealt with by judgments in 2011 (compared to 19% in 2010). The majority of the category I “urgent” applications (73%) have been pending for less than three years. The total number of “urgent” applications decreased by 47% compared to last year. This can be explained by the decrease in the number of cases where an interim measure has been granted and by the fact that many “urgent” cases have been disposed of. 73% of the category II applications (pilot or leading cases) have at least been communicated to the Government and 57% of all the applications in this category have been pending for less than three years. The total number of category II applications has increased by 5% compared to 2010. 57% of the category III applications (complaints about Articles 2, 3 4 or 5 § 1 of the Convention) are still waiting for a first examination by the Court and 68% of all the applications in this category have been pending for less than three years. The total number of category III applications has increased by 38% compared to 2010.

2 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site www.echr.coe.int. Category IV applications are potentially well-founded cases based on other Articles; category V are “repetitive applications”; category VI are applications identified as giving rise to a problem of admissibility and category VII are manifestly inadmissible applications.


http://www.echr.coe.int/


General information

Table 1 General statistical information

64500 61300 5%

2011 2010 +/-

5359 6674 -20%

2011 2010 +/-

52188 41182 27%

1511 2607 -42%

50677 38575 31%

31/12/2011 1/1/2011 +/-

151600 139650 9%

45850 47150 -3%

13700 4100 234%

92050 88400 4%

31/12/2011 1/1/2011 +/-

22600 21950 3%

2011 2010 +/-

13400 11800 14%

2. Interim procedural events

2011 2010 +/-[round figures (50)]

Applications at a pre-judicial stage

Applications communicated to respondent Government

1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation

By decision or judgment

Applications pending before a judicial formation

- Chamber (7 judges)

- Committee (3 judges)

Applications allocated

Applications disposed of administratively (applications not pursued)

3. Applications decided

4. Pending applications [round figures (50)]

5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (50)]

- by judgment delivered

- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)

- Single-Judge formation



Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation3

Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year

8400 1050013800

28200 2720032500

3540039350

41700

49850

5710061300 64500

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation

12600 15900 1980029400

3850050000

5680066500

151600

97300

79400

139650

119300

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

3 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.



Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 3,500 applications pending before a judicial formation)

Turkey 15950 10,5%

Poland 6400 4,2%

Serbia 6750 4,5% Ukraine

10250 6,8%

Romania12300 8,1%

Italy 13750 9,1%

Russia 40250 26,6%

remaining 37 States 34000 22,4%

United Kingdom 3650 2,4%

Bulgaria 4050 2,7%

Republic of Moldova 4250 2,8%

Total number of pending applications: 151 ,600

Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation4

Communicated106267,0%

Pending Government action48373,2%

Admissible671

0,4%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)4328928,6%

Single Judge or Committee

(cat. VI - VII)9220160,8%

Total applications151,600

4 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure.



Processing of applications

Chart 5 Major procedural steps in processing of applications

35001656

2506800

1463

750

90001573

950 178501686

900

172501717

750

20350

2447

800 276002956

1200

281603232

1719

270593456

1734

30163

4416

1880

33067

6203

2393

38575

6674

260750677

5359

1511

040008000

12000160002000024000280003200036000400004400048000520005600060000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Applications inadmissible or struck out Applications communicated Applications - judgment delivered

Chart 6 Number of judgments since 1999

177

695

888 844

703 718

1105

15601503 1543

16251499

1157

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011



Chart 7 Applications in categories I, II and III processed in 2010 and 2011

1194

537495

1342

573

412

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2010 2011

communicated

decision

judgment

Chart 8 Time elapsed since date of allocation to a judicial formation – pending category I “Urgent” applications by stage of proceedings5

179

179

149

197

3

98

135

11

97

69

7

29

124

24

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

one year or less one to two years two to three years three to four years more than four

awaiting first examination communicated admissible or awaiting art 41 judgment or government action

5 Most of the « urgent » cases awaiting first examination are cases awaiting the adoption of a decision or a judgment in a “leading” case.



Chart 9 Time elapsed since date of allocation to a judicial formation – pending category II “Leading or Pilot” applications by stage of proceedings

27

11

11

20

1

7

37

5

16

4

4

49

9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

one year or less one to two years two to three years three to four years four to five years


Chart 10 Time elapsed since date of allocation to a judicial formation – pending category III “Articles 2, 3, 4 or 5 § 1” applications by stage of proceedings

949

141

650

435

2

447

367

6

286

241

10

167

660

35

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

one year or less one to two years two to three years three to four years four to five years




Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population

State

2008 2009 2010 2011 1.1.2008 1.1.2009 1.1.2010 1.1.2011 2008 2009 2010 2011

Albania 75 99 96 85 3170 3169 3185 3185 0,24 0,31 0,30 0,27Andorra 1 6 8 8 83 87 85 85 0,12 0,69 0,94 0,94Armenia 106 125 197 173 3230 3238 3249 3249 0,33 0,39 0,61 0,53Austria 373 410 439 386 8332 8357 8375 8404 0,45 0,49 0,52 0,46Azerbaijan 334 361 337 532 8630 8934 8997 8997 0,39 0,40 0,37 0,59Belgium 166 256 304 256 10670 10741 10840 10918 0,16 0,24 0,28 0,23Bosnia and Herzegovina 971 621 658 509 3843 3760 3844 3844 2,53 1,65 1,71 1,32

Bulgaria 890 1194 1348 1206 7640 7602 7564 7505 1,16 1,57 1,78 1,61Croatia 608 755 992 1192 4435 4432 4426 4426 1,37 1,70 2,24 2,69Cyprus 66 59 118 69 795 802 803 804 0,83 0,74 1,47 0,86Czech Republic 721 726 606 523 10381 10475 10507 10533 0,69 0,69 0,58 0,50Denmark 73 63 96 111 5476 5519 5529 5561 0,13 0,11 0,17 0,20Estonia 169 204 265 346 1341 1340 1340 1340 1,26 1,52 1,98 2,58Finland 276 489 377 433 5301 5325 5351 5375 0,52 0,92 0,70 0,81France 2724 1589 1619 1600 63753 64105 64716 65075 0,43 0,25 0,25 0,25Georgia 1771 2122 375 395 4382,1 4219 4386 4386 4,04 5,03 0,85 0,90Germany 1572 1515 1683 1754 82222 82062 81802 81752 0,19 0,18 0,21 0,21Greece 416 518 585 668 11215 11263 11305 11330 0,37 0,46 0,52 0,59Hungary 425 449 436 656 10045 10030 10014 9986 0,42 0,45 0,44 0,66Iceland 7 10 15 10 314 321 318 318 0,22 0,31 0,47 0,31Ireland 48 62 62 54 4420 4450 4468 4480 0,11 0,14 0,14 0,12Italy 1824 3624 3852 4733 59618 60090 60340 60626 0,31 0,60 0,64 0,78Latvia 248 326 271 291 2271 2261 2248 2230 1,09 1,44 1,21 1,30Liechtenstein 8 14 15 9 35 36 36 36 2,26 3,92 4,17 2,50Lithuania 255 261 242 305 3366 3350 3329 3245 0,76 0,78 0,73 0,94Luxemburg 35 29 44 24 484 492 502 512 0,72 0,59 0,88 0,47Malta 12 14 23 21 411 413 414 418 0,29 0,34 0,56 0,50Republic of Moldova 1147 1322 945 1025 3573 3576 3564 3564 3,21 3,70 2,65 2,88Monaco 5 9 13 8 32 33 33 33 1,56 2,73 3,94 2,42Montenegro 156 269 305 318 628 626 633 633 - 4,30 4,82 5,02Netherlands 385 500 727 798 16404 16481 16575 16655 0,23 0,30 0,44 0,48Norway 79 79 86 154 4737 4801 4858 4920 0,17 0,16 0,18 0,31Poland 4369 4986 5777 5035 38116 38130 38167 38200 1,15 1,31 1,51 1,32Portugal 151 152 186 163 10618 10632 10637 10637 0,14 0,14 0,17 0,15Romania 5242 5260 5992 5207 21529 21497 21462 21414 2,43 2,45 2,79 2,43Russia 10146 13666 14309 12465 142009 141904 141915 141915 0,71 0,96 1,01 0,88San Marino 4 2 4 0 31 32 31 31 1,30 0,63 1,29 0,00Serbia 1067 1576 1566 3730 7374 7335 7307 7307 1,66 2,15 2,14 5,10Slovak Republic 488 569 568 553 5401 5411 5425 5435 0,90 1,05 1,05 1,02Slovenia 1353 598 837 426 2026 2053 2047 2050 6,68 2,91 4,09 2,08Spain 393 641 689 808 45283 45853 45989 46153 0,09 0,14 0,15 0,18Sweden 317 367 901 1899 9183 9259 9341 9416 0,35 0,40 0,96 2,02Switzerland 261 471 368 357 7591 7668 7786 7866 0,34 0,61 0,47 0,45

"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"

395 489 422 376 2045 2049 2053 2057 1,93 2,39 2,06 1,83

Turkey 3706 4474 5821 8702 70586 71517 72561 73723 0,53 0,63 0,80 1,18Ukraine 4770 4693 3962 4621 46373 45964 45783 45783 1,03 1,02 0,87 1,01United Kingdom 1253 1133 2766 1553 61186 61612 62027 62436 0,20 0,18 0,45 0,25Total 49861 57157 61307 64547 810587 813306 816167 818848 0,62 0,70 0,75 0,79

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Population (1000)

Allocated/population(10000)

SOURCES 2010 et 2011: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division.

The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 819 million inhabitants on 1 January 2011. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000 inhabitants was 0.79 in 2011.



Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation

StateSingle Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)


(cat. I - V)

CommunicatedPending

Government action

Admissible TOTAL

Albania 143 116 71 0 5 335Andorra 10 2 4 0 0 16Armenia 176 711 58 0 4 949Austria 393 96 100 0 12 601Azerbaijan 668 920 97 0 7 1692Belgium 308 220 33 0 6 567Bosnia and Herzegovina 1098 172 109 0 29 1408Bulgaria 2946 797 281 0 30 4054Croatia 1373 264 85 0 30 1752Cyprus 51 52 62 0 1 166Czech Republic 971 162 60 0 14 1207Denmark 109 4 12 0 0 125Estonia 566 31 18 0 3 618Finland 285 168 37 0 1 491France 2254 276 197 0 25 2752Georgia 589 2281 170 0 5 3045Germany 2737 182 66 0 18 3003Greece 529 547 170 0 25 1271Hungary 1566 321 77 0 7 1971Iceland 7 6 2 0 0 15Ireland 13 15 5 0 1 34Italy 3114 9498 1095 0 34 13741Latvia 316 128 97 0 11 552Liechtenstein 10 2 1 0 0 13Lithuania 404 128 50 0 4 586Luxembourg 3 0 4 0 2 9Malta 15 6 6 0 9 36Republic of Moldova 3168 700 322 45 26 4261Monaco 2 5 1 0 0 8Montenegro 688 132 43 0 6 869Netherlands 939 244 69 0 2 1254Norway 104 9 11 0 2 126Poland 4339 1650 366 0 21 6376Portugal 152 49 55 0 5 261Romania 5056 3428 1314 2447 41 12286Russia 35273 2968 1843 56 85 40225San Marino 0 0 3 0 1 4Serbia 2635 3615 496 0 6 6752Slovakia 777 174 90 0 11 1052Slovenia 2611 422 289 0 10 3332Spain 688 142 55 0 6 891Sweden 844 63 61 0 5 973Switzerland 825 162 59 0 5 1051"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" 612 358 49 0 1 1020

Turkey 5330 8483 2031 0 96 15940Ukraine 6183 1376 390 2289 33 10271United Kingdom 1321 2204 112 0 26 3663

ALL STATES 92201 43289 10626 4837 671 151624



Country-specific information

Albania

Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body


(cat. I - V)11635%

Communicated71

21%

Admissible5

1%Single Judge or

Committee (cat. VI - VII)

14343%

Total applications335

Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications

99

27

1710

96

2017

9

85

46

17

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2009 2010 2011

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered



Andorra



(cat. I - V)2

13%

Communicated4

25%


(cat. VI - VII)10

62%



6

2

1

0

8

3

1

0

8

4

2

0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2009 2010 2011







Armenia



(cat. I - V)71175%

Communicated586%

Admissible4

0,4%Single Judge or


17619%



125

104

14 9

197

81

15

5

173

144

16

5

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2009 2010 2011







Austria



(cat. VI - VII)39365%


(cat. I - V)96

16%

Communicated10017%

Admissible122%



410

355

55

15

439

510

23 19

386

334

21 18

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2009 2010 2011







Azerbaijan



(cat. I - V)920

54,4%

Communicated97

5,7%

Admissible7

0,4%


(cat. VI - VII)668

39,5%

Total applications1 692


361

304

24 7

337

167

4923

532

62 4525

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2009 2010 2011







Belgium



(cat. I - V)22039%

Communicated336%

Admissible6

1%


(cat. VI - VII)30854%



256

101

2811

304

69

30

4

256 265

18 9

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2009 2010 2011







Bosnia and Herzegovina



(cat. VI - VII)109878%


(cat. I - V)17212%

Communicated1098%

Admissible292%



621

966 21

658

1393

142

1

509

410

7933

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2009 2010 2011







Bulgaria



(cat. I - V)79720%

Communicated2817%

Admissible301%


(cat. VI - VII)294672%



1194

596

208

107

1348

525

92 84

1206

543

14173

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2009 2010 2011







Croatia



(cat. I - V)26415%

Communicated855%

Admissible302%


(cat. VI - VII)137378%Total applications

1 752


755

550

44 19

992

357

5521

1192

1014

65 49

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2009 2010 2011







Cyprus



(cat. I - V)52

31%

Communicated62

37%

Admissible1

1%Single Judge or


5131%



59

107

28

3

118

57

93

69

4339

3

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2009 2010 2011







Czech Republic



(cat. VI - VII)97181%


(cat. I - V)16213%

Communicated605%

Admissible141%



726765

15 6

606

1367

5912

523

588

46 29

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2009 2010 2011







Denmark



(cat. VI - VII)10987%


(cat. I - V)4

3%

Communicated12

10%



63

34

73

96

36

26

0

111

99

16

6

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2009 2010 2011







Estonia



(cat. VI - VII)566

91,6%


(cat. I - V)31

5,0%

Communicated18

2,9% Admissible3

0,5%



204

170

10 4

265

183

11 3

346

229

12 3

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2009 2010 2011







Finland



(cat. VI - VII)285

58,0%


(cat. I - V)168

34,2%

Communicated37

7,5%

Admissible1

0,2%



489

342

38 29

377

214

29 17

433

485

247

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2009 2010 2011







France



(cat. VI - VII)225482%


(cat. I - V)27610%

Communicated1977% Admissible

251%



15891512

11133

1619

1367

90 44

1600

1485

10532

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2009 2010 2011







Georgia



(cat. I - V)228175%

Communicated1706%

Admissible5

0,2%Single Judge or


58919%



2122

86 46 11

375

1608

44 4

395

16050 4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2009 2010 2011







Germany



(cat. VI - VII)273791%


(cat. I - V)1826%

Communicated662%

Admissible181%



1515

1711

7823

1683

1544

45 47

1754

1095

32 46

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2009 2010 2011







Greece



(cat. VI - VII)52942%


(cat. I - V)54743%

Communicated17013%

Admissible252%



518

336

10775

585

383

128

60

668

179

11273

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2009 2010 2011







Hungary



(cat. I - V)32116%

Communicated774%


(cat. VI - VII)156680%

Admissible7

0,4%



449

233

6030

436

240

79

21

656

224

99

34

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2009 2010 2011







Iceland



(cat. VI - VII)7

47%


(cat. I - V)6

40%

Communicated2

13%



10

9

10

15

8

2

1

10

14

0 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2009 2010 2011







Ireland



(cat. VI - VII)13

38%


(cat. I - V)15

44%

Communicated5

15%

Admissible1

3%



62

45

2 0

62

76

2 2

54

77

4 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2009 2010 2011







Italy



(cat. I - V)949869%

Communicated10958%


(cat. VI - VII)311423%

Admissible34

0,2%



3624

584 756

70

3852

687

220

668

4733

556214

84

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

2009 2010 2011







Latvia



(cat. VI - VII)31657%


(cat. I - V)12823%

Communicated97

18%

Admissible112%



326

481

317

271 273

45

4

291 300

3012

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2009 2010 2011







Liechtenstein



(cat. VI - VII)10

77%


(cat. I - V)2

15%

Communicated1

8%



14

7

10

15 15

01

9

10

2

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2009 2010 2011







Lithuania



(cat. VI - VII)40468%


(cat. I - V)12822%

Communicated509%

Admissible4

1%



261

331

17 9

242

153

15 8

305

152

2210

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2009 2010 2011







Luxembourg



(cat. VI - VII)3

33%

Communicated4

45%

Admissible2

22%

Total applications9


29

25

9

3

4439

47

24

66

2 3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2009 2010 2011







Malta


Communicated6

17%


(cat. I - V)6

17%


(cat. VI - VII)15

41%

Admissible9

25%



1415

8

5

23

14

12

4

21

6

4

13

0

5

10

15

20

25

2009 2010 2011







Republic of Moldova



(cat. I - V)70016%

Communicated3228%


(cat. VI - VII)316874%

Admissible261%

Pending Government action

451%



1322

386

217

37

945

434

135

29

1025

550

11842

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2009 2010 2011







Monaco



(cat. VI - VII)2

25%


(cat. I - V)5

62%

Communicated1

13%

Total applications8


9

10

01

13

7

0 0

8

14

1

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2009 2010 2011







Montenegro



(cat. VI - VII)68879%


(cat. I - V)13215%

Communicated435%

Admissible6

1%



269

135

4 1

305

45

28

2

318

135

248

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2009 2010 2011







Netherlands



(cat. I - V)24419%

Communicated696%


(cat. VI - VII)93975%

Admissible2

0,2%



500

270

594

727

299

31 4

798

485

27 6

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2009 2010 2011







Norway



(cat. VI - VII)10482%


(cat. I - V)9

7%

Communicated119%

Admissible2

2%



7989

5 3

8676

91

154

102

4 1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2009 2010 2011







Poland



(cat. VI - VII)4339

68,1%


(cat. I - V)1650

25,9%

Communicated366

5,7%

Admissible21

0,3%



4986

3635

296134

5777

3924

315108

5035 5038

24772

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2009 2010 2011







Portugal



(cat. VI - VII)15258%


(cat. I - V)49

19%

Communicated55

21%

Admissible5

2%



152

9085

62

186

116

61

35

163

123

3548

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2009 2010 2011







Romania



(cat. I - V)342828%

Communicated131411%

Pending Government action244720%


(cat. VI - VII)505641%

Admissible41

0,3%



5260

4094

627

205

5992

3650

422150

5207

4585

916

105

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2009 2010 2011







Russia



(cat. VI - VII)3527388%

Communicated18435%Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination (cat. I - V)

29687%

Pending Government action

560,1%

Admissible85

0,2%



13666

6961

1032575

14309

6911

721 430

12465 12223

734199

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

2009 2010 2011







San Marino


Admissible1

25%

Communicated3

75%Total applications4


2

1

0 0

4

5 5

0 0

3 3

1

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

2009 2010 2011







Serbia



(cat. VI - VII)263539%

Admissible6

0,1%Communicated

4967%


(cat. I - V)361554% Total applications

6 752


1576

444

82 50

1566

1195

132 38

3730

449 451

12

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2009 2010 2011







Slovakia



(cat. VI - VII)77773%


(cat. I - V)17417%

Communicated909%

Admissible111%



569

357

41 53

568

664

129

41

553

694

96

21

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2009 2010 2011







Slovenia



(cat. I - V)42213%

Communicated2899%

Admissible10

0,3%


(cat. VI - VII)261178%Total applications

3 332


598628

254

9

837

581

328

6

426

517

90

16

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2009 2010 2011







Spain



(cat. VI - VII)68877%


(cat. I - V)14216%

Communicated556%

Admissible6

1%



641

495

21 24

689

454

11 16

808871

4615

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2009 2010 2011







Sweden



(cat. I - V)636%

Communicated616%

Admissible5

1%


(cat. VI - VII)84487%



367274

19 3

901

283

13 6

1899

2586

38 4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2009 2010 2011







Switzerland



(cat. VI - VII)82579%


(cat. I - V)16215%

Communicated596%

Admissible5

0,5%



471

248

277

368

305

3011

357

130

13 11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2009 2010 2011







“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”



(cat. VI - VII)61260%


(cat. I - V)35835%

Communicated495%

Admissible1

0,1%



489

430

53

17

422

456

95

15

376 380

38

6

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2009 2010 2011







Turkey



(cat. VI - VII)533033%


(cat. I - V)848353%

Communicated203113%

Admissible961%



4474

1965

1194

490

5821

3296

1311

501

8702

7527

458 229

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

2009 2010 2011







Ukraine



(cat. I - V)137613%

Communicated3904%

Pending Government action228922%


(cat. VI - VII)618361%

Admissible33

0,3%



4693

2863

400

187

3962

3311

1587

119

4621 4647

743

107

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

2009 2010 2011







United Kingdom



(cat. VI - VII)132136%


(cat. I - V)220460%

Communicated1123%

Admissible261%



1133

764

65 21

2766

1175

68 23

1553

1028

60 30

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2009 2010 2011






Analysis of statistics 2011 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics...

Documents

Transcript of Analysis of statistics 2011 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics...