Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations -...

download Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Westberg - SVK

of 113

Transcript of Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations -...

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    1/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    2/113

    Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultetUTH-enheten

    Besksadress: ngstrmlaboratorietLgerhyddsvgen 1Hus 4, Plan 0

    Postadress:Box 536751 21 Uppsala

    Telefon:018 471 30 03

    Telefax:018 471 30 00

    Hemsida:http://www.teknat.uu.se/student

    Abstract

    Analysis of a load frequency control implementation inSwedish run-of-river hydropower stations

    Andreas Westberg

    The total amount of frequency deviations have during the last decade increasedexponentially in the Nordic synchronous power system. The transmission systemoperators have therefore decided to implement load frequency control as a newautomatic control system to stem these frequency deviations.

    The aim of this feasibility study is to analyse the effects of an LFC implementation inSwedish hydropower stations by using a more dynamic river governing. The methodchosen to analyse the effects of LFC-governing was to create a Matlab Simulink hydropower station library including dynamic modules for rivers and turbinegovernors. The library is then used to create a river reach that is implemented in anENTSO-E model for the Nordic frequency reserves. The governing of the river useseconomical dispatch theory to optimally distribute a LFC setpoint signal from theENTSO-E model to the different hydropower stations.

    Results show that the developed method has a future potential to create morefrequency controlled reserves. By creating a central governing unit it was possible togovern frequency controlled reserves over an entire river reach under certainscenarios, but there are still many obstacles to overcome before an actualimplementation. The method does however show both the possibilities and drawback of frequency controlled reserves in cascade coupled hydropower systems.

    Key words: Hydropower, power system, frequency controlled reserves, loadfrequency control, Matlab Simulink

    ISSN: 1650-8300, UPTEC ES12004Examinator: Kjell Pernestlmnesgranskare: Urban Lundin

    Handledare: Niklas Dahlbck

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    3/113

    3

    A a a a ba a a a a aK a c a a . D a ba a

    a a a a . E

    a a a a a ba a .

    U a c a ac a a a a a 200 / a 1000 / a . D a a

    a a a a a a a c aa a c a . M a a c a a a ca ( , , ) c HVDC

    a b . E a E E (E E) a a a a

    c a . E a a a a L a F c C (LFC) a a a a a a. (ENTSO E 2011a)

    S a K a b a a a a LFC, a a , a a a a a ? F a a

    , c c a a a a a .

    M a a a a a a a b b a c a b a c a a ENTSO E

    a a . D c a a a a b a a a a a . D a a a a a a a c a c a a a a

    a c a b a a ENTSO E a a a c a a a a

    a b a ba a c .

    R a a a a a a a a , a ca , c a b a a

    a . M c a a b a a a b a

    a b a c b a a a a .T .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    4/113

    4

    1 I c .......................................................................................................................................... 5

    1.1 P c a ............................................................................................................................. 5

    1.2 M .................................................................................................................................. 5

    1.3 L a c ................................................................................................................. 5 2 Bac ...................................................................................................................................... 7

    2.1 E a .............................................................................................................................. 7

    2.2 F c a .......................................................................................................................... 7

    2.3 F c a ...................................................................................................... 9

    2.4 H ................................................................................................................................. 10

    3 T ................................................................................................................................................. 13

    3.1 H ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 F c c .......................................................................................................... 18

    4 M a M ...................................................................................................... 21

    4.1 ENTSO E ............................................................................................................................ 22

    4.1 H P a .................................................................................................................... 24

    4.2 LFC b ........................................................................................................... 32

    4.3 Ec ca a a LFC a ............................................................................... 39

    5 S a ......................................................................................................................................... 40

    5.1 R ac ............................................................................................................................... 40

    5.2 S a .......................................................................................................................... 41

    5.3 R ......................................................................................................................................... 42

    6 D c ........................................................................................................................................... 53

    6.1 M a ............................................................................................................... 53

    6.2 R ......................................................................................................................................... 57

    6.3 P c a ................................................................................................................................... 60

    7 C c ......................................................................................................................................... 61

    R c ............................................................................................................................................. 62

    A ................................................................................................................................................ 64

    A M M ........................................................................................................................... 64

    B I a / a ................................................................................................................... 71

    C S a ........................................................................................................................ 81

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    5/113

    5

    1 T N c a a (TSO ) a acc ab c ba a 50.00 +/ 0.100 H . T acc a c a a a

    a ca c a a ca a a a a a ab N c TSO a a a a b c

    ca ab c . T a b a a a c a a c c c b c a

    c a ca b b . I a , a a aa c c (LFC) a ca b N

    .

    1.1 T c a c a a c LFC a c

    . T a b b a a c b a a a c b a a :

    C ?

    T c a a :

    D a c LFC a a ac , b c a a a a c a .

    A a a ca ac a a c c c a a a

    A a a a ca b a a a c ab ab c b a a c LFC .

    1.2 I c a c a a b c a . T b c a ac a b a N c c c a b E E (E E). T ENTSO E c a a LFC a ac

    a b a ac .c ca b a a c a a LF

    I a a b c a a a a a c a .

    1.3 T c a a a b . T c a S a K a (S K) a

    a Va a a c . T c c b c 6.1.1 A a c .

    1 T a a a c c , a a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    6/113

    6

    2 O c a a a a b a c a . T b a a a a .

    3 O a a c c a a a a a b .

    4 T a a a c a a b , a , a .

    5 A b a a a a a a a a a c a ac c ac b a

    6 O a c c c a , ac a a . T b c c a ac a b c c a

    7 T a ac ac LFC b a a +/ a a a c a a b .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    7/113

    7

    2 T a a a a a c A A , c a a c cc a a b N c TSO . O c c

    a 400 MWFC b c c a c aa a 400 MW . (ENTSO E 2011a, c.2.4)

    W c c a ca b 400 MW LFC , aa a TSO a a c

    ac c a a a a ca ac ca a .

    T c a b c ac c a a a a a .

    2.1 T N a a Ja a 1 1996 a c ca S a N a . F F a , D a a E a a c T a N a a ; a c a a

    ca a a b b a a a a (N S aa a a (N E ba a ). B a a b c

    a b .(N AS 2011)

    D a a , N c TSO a c a b . T a a a a a ba a c a (F ),

    (FD ) a (F ). (ENTSO E 2007,c a . A 2)

    2.2 I a a c a 50.00 +/ 0.100 H a a b a

    a a c ba b N c TSO (ENTSO E 2007, a . A 3), a ba a c b c a c . T c a

    , TSO a c c a a ,

    c . W a ba c cc a c ca c a a , a c a a a ba a cc . T a c a a ba 50.00 +/ 0.100 H . D a a acc a a

    c a a ca c ca b F 1.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    8/113

    8

    F 1: F / NORDIC 1995 2(EN O E 2011 , .3)

    T a a c a b a c a b c a N a a ,

    F 2: A 5 2009 2010 . (EN O E 2011 , .4)

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    9/113

    9

    2.3 W NORDIC a a a a a

    a c (FNR a FDR) a c a a a c . I a a c ac a a c a c

    a a a c b c a . T

    c ac b ac cc c F 3.

    F 3: O ( ) (P) . ( C E 2009, .3) 1

    W E E (ENTSO E), a a b c a ac abb a a a

    FDR) (FC ) a a c a a a c a ca (F ). T ENTSO E

    b .

    W NORDIC , FCR a b a c c a a c . I , FCR ca b c b a

    ba a c FRR a a a a baab a a cc acc a c a .

    2.3.1 ( )

    T FCR NORDIC c (F ) a (FD ) a a b b [MW] b N c TSO a

    a a ba . T a b a a c b a2, FNR b ac a a a ba 50.00 +/ 0.100 H

    FDR 49.9 49.5 H . I a b a a ac a c c NORDIC a . T b

    FNR a a a a b a a 2 % a

    1 UCTE C E a a ENTSO E E E

    2 G a a ca ac a a 25 MW a a b a ca E c a a b a c a a . (B c 2011)

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    10/113

    10

    c a a b a a 60 . F FDR, b a c a 49.500 H 50 % b a 5 a

    a 30 . T N c TSO a a a a 600 MW FDR c a a a acc N 1 c3. (ENTSO E

    2007, c a . A 2)

    2.3.2 F a c c a a a FRR a

    b c b .

    ( ) , C a c LFC c a b c a

    c c b . T a b a a ab b ; a .

    1. C a a (CA): A , a a a , a c b a

    a c a c c a . (IEEE S a a C 1991 . 2. A a c (ACE): T c a a a c

    a c a a a a c . T a a c a cc c c a b a c

    (IEEE S a a C 1991 . 124)

    B a ACE a TSO a ab b c a ac a b c a a .

    T ac a LFC c N c a bb a a a LFC a b b N c

    a c a SCADA a . I b a b a acc a c

    . (B c 2011)

    ( ) T a a a a FCR a a

    a ab .4 T a c a a a b ca ac b c 10 MW a b ac a 15 . O

    a , b a ca TSO c a a b a a b ab c a b . W a a b a ac a a

    TSO c b . (ENTSO E 2007, c a . A 2)

    2.4 T a a c a :

    3 D a a a c a a a c ( ca , b ba , c c.) a a a ac

    a a b a acc . (ENTSO E 2007, .60)4 W a c a cc , c ca c , c a a c c , c a b ca a c . T acc a c a

    c c a ab a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    11/113

    11

    A a a a .

    A a b , a c. a c c ca .

    T ca b a ca ca a a ac , Fa c a a a a a

    a ca ca , a c c b ca a .

    F 4: , . (N . 2011)

    W , a c ca b c a b a a c a a a c c ca b ac a c c . A ac a a a c a a ca b

    a a . I S ca ac 33 TW (S E 201 a a a ac a a a

    0 100% , a a c c

    A a a a . I a b ca aa a (S a ) b ab a

    c c c a (N a a ). F a b a a, c a b a a a a ,

    a b a c a .

    F c a c a a , a S a a a a b a a a a

    c a . T b c a ca

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    12/113

    12

    a c a a c a b c a . T c a a b c a a a T a c a a a a a a a a(Va a . 2011)

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    13/113

    13

    3 T c c b c a a a

    .

    3.1 A c b a a c c c ca b c c ca a b a a a .

    . 1 =

    . 2 = = = E = [J]P = [W]

    = a a [ ]Q = a c a [3/ ]H = a b a a ac [ ]

    = a a a c a [ /2]

    I . 2 a a a ; b a , a a a a c a , a a a a a

    a a c a a c a c . T a a c a a a a a a a

    b ab a c c a . . 2 a a ca b c a a a . B c . 3.

    . 3 = a = a c c a [1]

    3.1.1 T c c ac . 3 c a b a a c a , c a a a ac a a a . W a

    b a a c ca a a c b c c a c a a

    c a c a ab (SOPT) a c a ac a b b , F 5.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    14/113

    14

    F 5: G .

    3.1.2 I F 6 a b a b Va

    a (S b 2011). I c a a : PI c a c a ac c . T ca b a a a a c a a a ; a , a , b c. F

    a a a a c a +/ 100 H . F a a a b a . (S b 2011, .1,2)

    T b a ; c a [H ] aH a a a a [MW]. T a b a

    , a c b LFC a b , b a c b c a .

    77

    82

    87

    92

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    T o t a l e f

    f i c i e n c y

    [ % ]

    Water flow [m3/s]

    G1+G2+G3

    G1+G3

    G1+G2

    G1

    G3

    320150

    290

    185

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    15/113

    15

    F 6: ; ( ) (P ), ; (P ) ; K ,

    K . (K 2011)

    T ca a b a :

    K = 1 ; b a a [1]

    T = 6, 2.4 ( 0, 1); b a c a [ ] (=1/K )

    K = 0.1, 0.04 ( 0, 1) ; [1]

    K a PI a a ,K c a ac c ac a0, 1 a a b a a

    a ac a . T a a a a ac c b a a c a a a

    2006 . 5)

    . 4 = R = a [MW/H ]K = [1] = c a a c [H ]

    a = a c [H ]P = a a a c a c a [MW]Pba = ba b a [MW]

    I F 6, a c a a a b b ca a c c a a b a a c c

    b F 6 ca b c b b :

    . 5

    . 5 ca b c a b .

    . 6

    B a ac c a ca a a . 6 . 7ac a c a , . 8

    . 7

    )())()()(1

    ()()()( s P sdP K s f sT

    K s P sdP s P set govdroopi

    P set gov gov ++=+=

    )()(11

    11)( s P s f sT

    K

    K K sT K K s P Set

    idroop

    P droop

    i P

    droop gov ++

    ++=

    )(1

    1

    11)( s f

    sT K

    K K sT K

    K s P

    idroop

    P droop

    i P

    droop gov

    +

    +

    +=

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    16/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    17/113

    17

    b = .( . c =( .( .

    F ca ab , b a a a ba a a . (Ac & Ra c 2007, .63)

    . 12 , , > 0 >

    . 13 ( T ac c b a a b a

    a a a 0 0.5. Acc (B.219) a ca a a a a a 0.2, a a a 0.5 a

    a a a a . F a a(B . . 2008, .222). F , a a =0.2 a b c , a c a a a . (B . . 2008, .222)

    . 10 a a ; a a c b b . 14 a . 15, F 7. T a

    a a . W M a b c a , F 7 b

    a . W c a a a c c a

    ac a a a a a a . T a a a a a a a a ac a b

    a a .

    . 14 = (

    . 15 =

    F 7: G ( ) ( ) ( ICAIRE

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    18/113

    18

    W a a a a c c a a a b . T b c a c a . T c

    a a ac a c ac a a a b ac a b a c a .

    , a a b a a a . T c

    c a a .

    3.1.5 A a a c ; a a a c a c a b a ac . T a ca c a . 16.

    . 16 = (V = a [3]A = ac a a [2]

    = ac [ ]

    F . 16 ac ca b c c a , . 17, c b .

    . 17 ( = + ( 0 = ac a ab [ ]

    3.2 T c a ba a c b c a c ca b a

    . B a a a a c , a a 1.3 L a a ca b (B a 2009, .17).

    . 18 ( ( = ( + ( P = c c [MW]J = a c a [MW /H ]

    = c [H ]D = a a c c [MW/H ]

    W La ac a a ca b a

    . 19 ( = ( ( T c a a c a ac b a

    a c b a c . 19.

    3.2.1 T a c a b FCR b . 20 a a ca F 8. T a a c c a a c a

    a b b a a a c b a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    19/113

    . 20 = 1/K = R =

    F 8: G FDR (K 2011)

    . 20 a a a

    a a , b a c

    3.2.2 T a c c R a R a ;

    a , F 9

    . 21

    . 22

    ACE = a a c P c a = = c K D = D = a a

    )()( intt P t ACE erchan=

    loadD p systemDroo

    D K +=1

    19

    a [MW/H ]

    FNR FDR

    a a a

    FCR a ca a a .

    , a ab

    a (CA) a a a ca c . (B a 2009, .23)

    [MW]c a a b CA [MW]

    [H ]c a ac c [H /MW]

    c c [MW/H ]

    )(t f ge +

    ing ampen

    . N G C

    c a a

    c a

    2.3.2 F c (ACE). T ACE

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    20/113

    20

    F 9: P LFC . (=K ) (B 2009, .2.10)

    T ACE c a a ca a c , ca a cK( ), c c a a a a b , F 9. A LFC c

    c a ac c c aac ac a a , . 23, . 23 a F 10. I

    a c a ac b a c. (B a 2009, c a .2.4)

    . 23 =

    . 24

    =

    PLFC a = a LFC a a ca c a b cK( ) [MW] = a c a ac [1]

    = a b [1]N = a b a [1]

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    21/113

    21

    F 10: P LFC .

    (=K ) (B 2009, .2.13)

    4 T a a ac a b c a a a ba a ca

    a a a b a . T c a

    H a ( , , b , b c

    LFC b

    T a c a a LFC a , a a F 11. T c a

    a a , E E a a c A & A (ENTSO E 2011a).

    F 11: ( ), LFC , / EN O E LFC .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    22/113

    22

    4.1 T ENTSO E , F 12, c c FCR a FRR/LFC c

    N c , a ( c a a ) c a a , a a a. M a a a c ca b

    (ENTSO E 2011b).

    F 12: EN O E N

    . (E (EN O E 2011 )

    T c a a a a b c LFC E , F 13. I c a c a . T c c a a FCR LFC a c a a a ac a . I a

    ca c LFC a ac a +/ 10 MW c b c a a FRR a a . W LFC a ca , a

    ENTSO E a a a +/ 390 MW, a 400 MW, LFC a , a a b . T a b c a a

    a a a c + /10 MW LFC c a ENTSO E a a ca b b a a a

    c a LFC b .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    23/113

    23

    F 13: EN O E LFC . I /O H LFC M . P LFC . O

    .

    T a a ca a LFC PI ac a c aE a a c F 14.

    F 14: EN O E LFC 100 H . (EN O E 2011 , .80)

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    24/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    25/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    26/113

    26

    F 17 c b a a a M a a c a a a N . Acc a a DC B

    a M a 11 b ac N a a 15 N a b a c a ac (Da 2011)

    F 17 ac ac N a 11

    b 15 . T b b a a a ac .

    F 17: 1 . . M ( ) ( ) N . 11 (660 ).

    F 18 a a b c a a a a ac M . A a a aa a a a a a c a bac (

    2011). T a b a a a a a

    acc b c .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    27/113

    27

    F 18: P M . ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 . . .

    4.1.2

    F 19: R I/O G I

    T , F 19, a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    28/113

    28

    . 25

    ( = + ( . 26 = . 27

    = (

    . 28 = ( = a ca ac a [ ]A = ac a a [2]DG = ( .D ) [ ]SG = ( . ) [ ]

    W ca c a ac , b ab a c a , a a b c

    a ac a a c b a ca

    a b .

    T a b a a b a b . b a a a a a

    . T ac b a a acc cF 20.

    F 20: R . I , ( ) ( ) , .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    29/113

    29

    4.1.3

    F 21: G : M I/O G I

    T , F 21, a b a c W b a a , c 3.1.2 T b G , b

    . . , a a a b ca acc . A a a bb P_ c a a a

    b P a a P ac a .

    T a b a a b a a c 0.002 . . ( = 0.1 H ). Acc a a c

    a Pc =0.02.

    . 29

    . 30 ( = ( =.. = . [ I F 22 0.002 . . c a a

    acc . T ca c c a aa a .

    1.0,002.0)( == droop K s s f

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    30/113

    30

    F 22: 0.002 . . (=0.1 H ) 0.02 . . =60 .

    4.1.4

    F 23: I/O G I

    I , F 23, a Ma ab S L U ab a a a a c a a a . T a a

    a c a a a c ab a ,

    c a a .

    T a b a a b a a , F 24,

    a c c c a SOPT ab , F 25. T aa ab a c a a a a b a

    c b a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    31/113

    31

    F 24: R M . M

    F 25: A . M OP .

    A ca F 24 c F 25 c .

    0,0020,0040,0060,0080,00

    100,00120,00140,00160,00180,00

    4 0

    , 0 0

    9 0

    , 0 0

    1 4 0

    , 0 0

    1 9 0

    , 0 0

    2 4 0

    , 0 0

    2 9 0

    , 0 0

    3 4 0

    , 0 0

    3 9 0

    , 0 0

    4 4 0

    , 0 0

    4 9 0

    , 0 0

    5 4 0

    , 0 0

    5 9 0

    , 0 0

    6 4 0

    , 0 0

    P o w e r

    [ M W ]

    discharge [m3/s]

    MIDSKOG P-Q curve

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    32/113

    32

    4.2

    F 26: LFC I/O G I

    T FC b c LFC a a , TSO SCADA , b a a c c b c a a

    . 33.

    . 31 = ( = ( +

    . 32 = +

    . 33 ( , ( , C = a a cCP = a a cCP = a a c

    P a = a c [MW]PLFC = b LFC [MW]P = a b [MW]PS a c = a c a [MW]P a c = a c a [MW]

    4.2.1 T a LFC b a :

    Wa : U /L , / a c a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    33/113

    33

    P : M / a c a .

    F a ab a c a a c a c a . T a a a c a ac a ca c b a a / a c a a a a a

    ca ac . T a a

    . 34 +

    . 35 = +

    . 36 = P a / = a / ca ab c a [MW]PFCR = FCR ca ac [MW]

    T b ab a b acc a c a

    a . F a a a c a a .

    Sa a a a a a P. T a a a a a ab c a a a LFC a

    a c a . W a a . T a c a ca c a a :

    . 37 ( + = +(< ( > (

    ( + = , =

    . 38 < ( >= ( . 39 = = ( 6 V ( ) = a [3]T = a a [ ]H = a ca ac [ ]A = ac a a [2]

    . 38 c a a b a a a a . I a a acc ac

    a b . T a ca ca c a b

    . 40 ( + = = ( +< ( > (

    . 41 ( =< ( > (6 T c () a S L ab P . Q a a (SOPT ab , 4.1.4 T

    c )

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    34/113

    34

    =< ( > ( S b . 41 . 39 a a .

    . 42

    ( = < ( > (

    T a c ca c a a a .

    . 43 ( + = = ( +< ( > (

    . 44 ( = < ( > ( T c a , B a a c a , a . Ta [ 1;0;1] c LFC a a a , a a

    a a c a a c c .

    . 45 ( ( ( (

    . 46 ( ( ( ( I a c a c a b a a a , c LFC a

    a . 47.. 47 , ,

    4.2.2 T a c a a a a b

    a a

    P a a a

    S ac a

    F , a c a , . 48, . 49 a a c a c a a a a ac a a LFC a a , . 50.

    . 48 = +

    . 49 =

    . 50 = W c a c b c b b ,

    a a A A.6 LFC b .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    35/113

    35

    4.2.2.1 T a a c , . 51, LFC c

    a b a a a a c :

    . 51

    = ,

    = ac [1]

    . 51 ca a b a a a a c a a

    . 52 = W a c b a a c b a a ca ca c a

    E . 53 = =

    S b . 52 E . 53

    . 54 = = . 54 ca b b

    . 55

    = 4.2.2.2 T ac a a c , . 56, ca a , a a a , b

    a b a c c .

    . 56 = = H = a a ca ac [ ]

    LFC = ac c a LFC [ ] = ac [1]

    A = ac a a [2]Q b = a c a [3/ ]

    T a c acc c a b ca b

    . 57 = = B a a a a a , a

    a a a a ca b c a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    36/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    37/113

    37

    . 69 =( , ( , ( ,

    ( ,( , ( , ( , ( , ( , =

    ( , ( , ( , ( ,( , ( , ( , ( ,

    =((((

    ( ,( ,( , = ( ,( ,

    . 70 = +

    . 71 = + B a a a a c acc , b a a c, ac a c a a b a a =0, a a a ca c

    , a a c .

    T LFC b a a a a LFC a ;

    a a a c a .

    T a a LFC a a 30 MW +30 MW. A ca bc b a a b a , F 27.

    F 27: LFC . .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    38/113

    38

    T a a c a a c a . F a ab a b .

    S ac : M = 0.5 , N = 0.05 a S = 0.05 .

    S a c Q0=500 3/ .

    LFC a : 50 +60 MW.

    A ca F 28 b LFC a , b a a a cc a a ac a b c b

    W a a ac a a ac , a b c ac a b a 5.3 R a c 6.1.3 G LFC

    F 28: LFC M . LFC .

    .

    I c a c a , c a , a aLFC a . T a c , c a a a

    c a b b LFC a c a

    a a ca c a a c a . T LFC b ca b a c a a ca b F 29. I c a

    b a a a a c bM a N a c . B a LFC

    c a ca LFC a a c b b . 47. A a a b c 6.1.3 G LFC b .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    39/113

    39

    F 29: LFC M . LFC .

    .

    4.3 7 T a a a a a c LFC a c a a c ca c a LFC a a , D c b 6 a , 5.2 S a

    a a . T a b a b a a a S a K a a a ,

    . 72. T a b c a a c b ,

    . 73. F a c ca c a ac c a a a ca ac .

    . 72 8

    . 73

    P c = LFC a a [MW]RK c = FCR a c [SEK/MW ]N P S c = N S c a [SEK/MW ] = a ac [ ]H = a ac a [ ]T = a a [ ]

    7 I b a a TSO a c a . T a ca c a .

    8 T c a b ca SEK/MW .

    =t

    pricetot

    LFC income t T t RK t P SEK )()3600/)()((

    =

    t price plan

    i

    netHead i station

    i

    faceloweredSur i station

    loss t T t ot NordPoolSpt P H

    hSEK )()3600/)()((

    ,

    ,

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    40/113

    40

    5 T c a c b a a a a b c b

    a a . A a a b , ca b A C S a .

    5.1

    5.1.1 F J a a ac I a a J a a a

    ac c a ; H , Ka a G a b a c a ac c Tab 1.

    1: G J Hissmofors Kattstrupefors Granbofors

    Pmax [MW] 68 62 24minimum discharge [m 3/s] 50 50 50maximum discharge [m 3/s] 440 440 440maximum head [m] 20 18 6reservoir volume 14515 [DU] 9 830 [HU] 10 142 [HU]reservoir regulationscapacity [m] 2,75 0,75 0,25river travel time [min] - 2 2

    5.1.2 F Va a a ac I a a J a a a T ac c a ; M , N a S

    a c a ac c Tab 2.

    2: G Midskog Nverede Stugun

    Pmax [MW] 155 67 48minimum discharge [m 3/s] 100 100 100maximum discharge [m 3/s] 650 670 675maximum head [m] 27 13 7.3reservoir volume [HU] 4800 50 280reservoir regulationscapacity [m] 0,6 0,1 0,1

    river travel time [min] - 11 45

    9 1 [DU] = 1 a = a 1 3/ a a = 24 [ ] *3600 [ / ] * 1 [3/ ]10 1 [HU] = 1 = a 1 3/ a = 3600 [ ] * 1 [3/ ]

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    41/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    42/113

    42

    F 30: EN O E . A M D

    .

    T c c c a a a a ac aca ac , ca a , ca c b a ca ab a

    a , a a a a . T a c a b a a a A 2, Ma 3 a D c 6 c

    I c a a a c a , a ac a a a b ac . U a a a a

    c a ; ca c a a aa .11 B ca , a a c c a a a b c a b

    a a . T c a a c a b a c a b a a a .

    T a a a c b FNR a FDR a a a a a a LFC a FDR a

    ca ac a FDR a a c . F .

    F a c c a ac a a aA B I a / a .

    5.3 T c Va a ac , F aA C S a . T ac a c b ca a a ca c a a a a ca ac , c

    b a b ac a a c a . (B 2011)

    F ac a c a a b c a :

    11 D a a a a acc ENTSO E a . I a c a a a c a a b c . T a

    a a c a b c Ma ab ac S b c .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    43/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    44/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    45/113

    45

    F 33: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 . M M , N .

    F 34 a F 35 a ac a ac c . Ta c a c a M a FCR

    F 34 ca a ac b LFC a ac a b . T b a M a S c

    c a a a N . T a a N a a N c F 38. O a a ; a c a a c. A N a c

    c c a c a a S a c a

    F 34: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 . A M , N LFC LFC .

    , M , LFC +

    .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    46/113

    46

    I F 35 ca c ac a LFC a FCR a a M LFC c c a a a

    FCR a a a c . O ca a LFC a a b a c c a c ca a , 6.2.1 Ac

    a a .

    F 35: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 . A M , N LFC LFC .

    LFC FCR F 34.

    T c a LFC a a a c b F 36 a F 37. Ta c a c a a b

    (Q ) a (Q ) a a ac a .

    F 36: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 . R ( M , ), .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    47/113

    47

    F 37: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 . R M , ), .

    F a ab , ac ca b , FF 39. T a a c a a c a

    . F F 38 a b a a N ac b a a

    FCR a a M . T c a b c a b Na FCR a b ac .

    F 38: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 . R M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    48/113

    48

    F 39: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 . R M , N .

    F a , D c 6, a c ca ca c a a a a acc a c

    . 72 a . 73.

    F 40: A LFC M (RK , RK ) 2010 12 06.

    3 2010A a b , / c a a ac b c . F a a c c c b D c b 6 2010.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    49/113

    49

    T a a a a a a c a Q0=3103/ , M FCR aa a a LFC a .

    F 41: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , M M , N .

    F 42: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , M M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    50/113

    50

    F 43: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , R M , N .

    F 44: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , R M , N .

    A ca F 44 b ac S . Ta 6.1 M a .

    2 2010T a c a c a a Q0=75 3/ .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    51/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    52/113

    52

    F 47: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , R M , N .

    T a F 47 c a N F 102. I c a a a ac a

    F 48: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , R M , N .

    A a a a b ac c b c a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    53/113

    53

    6 T c a c a c a a

    a , a a a c a .

    6.1 6.1.1 A b b a a a c a

    a c .

    1 Ta c c a a c c . T a

    a c b c c a b a a a c a a c b a a . I b c a

    a a b a a a b .

    2 . T a

    c a ca c a . I b a a . 60 . 62, a a Q. I b a a a c a a , b b

    a a c a a ac a ca a M .

    3 . T a c a c a c a a c a

    a . I a a a a c a c a c ac b a a ab a ca a c .

    4 , , .T a ca c c a

    a a a a a ac b a c c . T a b c a a a

    b . T a c c b a a , a (J 2009).

    5 A T

    a b ab a a , a . A a

    ca b c a b a a ac a .

    6 , T

    b a a a ca c (B a 2009

    H a a 2011; M 2011).

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    54/113

    54

    7 FC +/ . I a c b b c +/ 10 MW a

    b c c a a FRR a . W a a a c b b b a c b a .

    6.1.2 T c b a a a a b b ab

    b c ac a a a a c bT ac a a c a a c a a

    a a b . S a a b c a b ab a a a c c b

    a c b a b c .

    F a b c ca b :

    1 I a a c . T a a a c c a a ac

    c a .

    2 U c a a c c a (E 2004) a a .

    6.1.3 T LFC a a b acc a c a :

    1 T a a c LFC c aa b a a a a c

    2 T ac a a c c c a a a , b a

    c a b a c c . A c c a a a c a a b

    a a a c c 13. I ca a b a a a a (Z 2009, a .4.2.3; V a . . 2010).

    T a LFC b a a c a a caa (MPC) a b a acc a a a b a a + FC b c

    a a a a c a ac b , a a . A a a a a

    a a a a a LFC a a +/ 10 a b a , b FC ac a

    a . T a a a a , a ab c LFC a .

    13 S c c Y = P/Q = c c / a = [MW /3].

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    55/113

    55

    a a a b bac , c a a ac , a

    ( C).

    A a Va a ac Ma 3 a A 2 a ac a a . T acc ac a

    b acc . 67, a a a a 1 N 1 b a a c a ac a ac . T ab

    ac a , b a a b . T ac c b a ca LFC a a . F c a

    ba a c c b a a ac , a a a a

    a . T a a a a c b a b c b ca b b b

    a b a b b b . T

    a b a .

    T a b a ab a a Va a a A 2, A C.2 Va a A 2 2010. T

    a b ca b a c , a 30 , LFC b a . D a , a a c a a

    a a a .

    6.1.4 I a c a a a c a a c

    c a ENTSO E . I b a a a ba a c c a ac ba a c a a

    a ca (ENTSO E 2011b, c.2.8.2).

    T c a a a c a , c a a ac a a a c c a c b a

    W c a a c c a a a a , a c c a a a a a a c a a . T a a

    a a a c a a c a ac a a

    T a a a a a a . T a a a a c LFC a a a . A a

    a J a D c b 6 a LFC a a H a c a a Q0=380 3/ , a Q0=350 3/

    c a a ca ac .

    I a a a a ca ac FCR (FNR+FDR) a LFC a c b a a ac ac

    ca ac . F a LFC a FDR ac , aa FDR a FNR a LFC a . S Aa a ac . LFC a FDR ac a a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    56/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    57/113

    57

    F a a a a c a . T a c a ; a c a

    a b a a a a , a a a c ac c a . T b ab b

    c a c a c a ac a ac a a

    6.2

    6.2.1 T a a a c b a a ca b a ac

    a a LFC a ;FCR LFC ac a aa .

    T b a a LFC FCR a a c a LFC . T a a a a a ac a

    a a c LFC c a c ba a a a a a ab a ca .

    O a ca b a a FCR, LFC c a ab a a FCR. T a LFC

    a a a a a c a a b c c c a . T a LFC a

    a c a a b a a . a a c a a ac c a b a b a a

    a b . T a b b a c a a a a .

    T c b a a ac LFC a , a bc c a c c a a a b ;

    a a N S a ELBAS . A a aa a c b a LFC a FDR a a

    ac ac a a c .

    6.2.2 A c , LFC a b c c aa a c c a a a b c a b c a

    a a a a ac a . T a a b c a , MW , a LFC .

    T a a a b c a ac b c a a . T ca b b a a

    c a a a a a c a , F 6a c a , F 97F 105F 113.

    T c c c a cc a a a b , c a a . P b a c c

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    58/113

    58

    a a , c a ca , a . I a ba ca a ba a .

    6.2.3 T a b a c a LFC a

    a c a a c ( a ) ac a . I a c a .

    W LFC a ac a b a a ac , b a a a a c

    ac a a c a a . T ac a a b a c

    a b a a a a a a .

    F a Ma 3, A 2 a D c 6 a c a A a a ba a c Ma a D c b a a

    b a ba a c , F ! H .. I c acc a a F ! H . a F 49 a c a . T

    a c a , Ma D c b , a a a acc a c a , a a ab a . T acc a c a c a a acc

    ba a c .

    F 49: A M D LFC . B

    .

    T A a ba a c c a ba a c a LFC a a a c ca b F 4

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    59/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    60/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    61/113

    61

    LFC a . I a b b a b FLFC a a a FDR c a

    ba a c (ENTSO E 2007, c a . A 2) c a caa c . T b LFC a a F

    a .

    T a a a a a a b ac ac a . T c b a b a a a

    b a b a b a c c ca b a .

    T c a a c a b . A a a b a

    b ca a a a ab a a c b a a b a . T a a ab a a a c , ca a , c ca a c.

    7 T a c a c c c b

    ac , c a c b c c , b a c . A a c a a a

    c a c a a . A a a c a ac a a c a a

    N c TSO .

    W a a c b a a , a a a a

    a . A

    .

    A a c a a c a a a c c a a a ac a a . I a

    a a c c a a , b ca aa b . N a a a a c c c c a a a ca c ;

    a .

    T a b a a a a c b a a a c a b ab c b a a c LFC . U

    c c c ca b a a a a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    62/113

    62

    B , P.B., H b , W.C. & V , B.E., 2008.H , P c Ha .

    B a , H., 2009. F C , S .B a , H. & H a a, T., 2011.I A G C , CRC P .

    M , P., 2011. 2 ., H aba I a ;L : BSP b ca ;CRC P .

    Z , J., 2009. , J W & S .

    E , K., 2004. S I ca I a C a O a UA a ab a : :// . b. / ? = : b : : : a 88916 [ a D c b2011].

    D Ja , E. . ., 1994. H b a c .IEEE , 9(4), .1709 1715.

    J , E., 2009. S a a a a a a . A a ab a ::// . b. / ? = : b : : : a 113284 [ a D c b 7, 2011].

    K , A.D., 2009. A a a c a 70 a M .H J , 54, .43 61.

    V a , K., P , N. & ac, D., 2010. O a b a c c a . I2010 IEEE I I E (I IE). 2010 IEEE

    I a a S I a E c c (ISIE). IEEE, 286 291.

    Ac , S. & Ra c , W., 2007. C D a 2.0.3 U Ma a . A a ab a : :// ..c / /IUT/c a /.

    ENTSO E, 2011a. ANALYSIS & REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMATIC RESERVES IN THENORDIC SYNCHRONOUS SYSTEM.

    ENTSO E, 2011b. ANALYSIS & REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMATIC RESERVES IN THENORDIC SYNCHRONOUS SYSTEM S M c .

    ENTSO E, 2007. N c G C 2007 N c c c .

    H , C. M., 2006. M a , b c a a a ARISTO.

    IEEE S a a C , 1991. IEEE R c D T A a c GC E c c P S .

    N . , 2011. a a Na a c . A a ab a ::// . . / a / a a # [ b 9, 2011].

    N AS, 2011. N Ma . A a ab a ::// . a a c .c / a / a / [ c b 7, 2011].

    S b , E., 2011. N a a a a a ab a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    63/113

    63

    S E , 2011. K a S . A a ab a ::// . . / a /S a /K a %C3%A4 / a . [ a

    N b 9, 2011].

    UCTE, 2009. P1 P c 1: L a F c C a P a c [C]. A a ab a ::// . . / a / _ a /_ b a / b ca /c / /P c 1_ a .

    B , E., 2011. R , F G a AB.

    B c , C., 2011. NORDEL R , S a K a .

    Da b c , N., 2011. H a c a c , Va a AB.

    Da , ., 2011. M S ac , Va a AB.

    . A a ab a ::// c 2. .c /VICAIRE/ _1b/c a _5/ a . [S b 14, 2011].

    VICAIRE, 2011. VICAIRE M 1B C a 5. . A a ab a : :// c 2. .c /VICAIRE/ _1b/c a _5/ a . J 06, 2012

    Va a . , 2011. Va a V a . A a ab:// . a . / [ a D c b 7, 2011].

    Ka , R., 2011, Va a AB.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    64/113

    64

    F 50: M . M , N .

    .

    W a c , a ac cF 50 a c Va a ac M S .

    c a c a , F 51.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    65/113

    65

    F 51: I

    .1

    F 52: H , /

    I :

    P_ [MW] a b

    _ a [H ] c FCR a b

    Q_ _ [3/ ] c a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    66/113

    66

    O :

    A b

    I a a ab :

    S a c a a c a a ac b a c a a a c a a .

    .2

    F 53: R , /

    I :

    Q [ 3/ ],

    O :

    Q [ 3/ ], a b

    V_ a _ [3], a a

    I a a ab :

    T_ [ ] a a a c a ac

    T a [ ] M a ab

    [ ] c a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    67/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    68/113

    68

    .4

    F 55: G : I/O

    I :

    _ a [H ] a c

    P_ [MW]

    O :

    P_ c [MW] a c a ca c

    P( )_ c [MW] a FCR a

    I a a ab : K [ ] T b a a

    T [ ] T b a c a

    [ . .] T b

    Pba [MW] Ba a

    _ [H ] c

    P a [MW] a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    69/113

    69

    P [MW]

    .5

    F 56: , I/O

    I :

    P_ c [MW] b c a ca

    O

    Q_ b [3/ ] b

    I a a ab :

    SOPT ab a c a c (Q_ b ) c (P_ c )

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    70/113

    70

    .6

    F 57: LFC , I/O

    I :

    P_LFC_ [MW] a LFC a a TSO SCADA H_ _UP [ ] c c a a a a ca ac

    H_ _DOWN [ ] c c a a a a ca

    V_ _ a [ 3] a a ac a

    O

    P_LFC_ a [MW] c ac a

    P_LFC[MW] c ac a c LFC a

    P_LFC_ _OUT [MW] c a a TSO SCADA

    a cL a [ ] B a ca a a c a ac

    a cL a [ ] B a ca a a c a a

    a [MW] c a LFC a ac a

    [MW] c LFC a ac a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    71/113

    71

    I a a ab :

    P a R [MW] c a a a LFC a

    P R [MW] c a a LFC a

    P a [MW] c a a a c T_LFC [ ] LFC a a

    A_ a [ 2] c a a ac a

    A_ a [1/MW2] c a a

    B [c /MW] c a b c c

    N [ ] b a

    SOPT [MW a 3

    / ] c , c 4.1.4 T_ [ ] c a a a c ac

    T a a c , . 74, LFC c

    a b a a a a c :

    . 74 = Pba = ba c a , a ac a [MW]

    = ac [1]

    . 74 ca a b a

    . 75 = =

    = 0 00 0 00 = 0 00 0 00

    = a ac [1]W a c b a a c b a a ca ca c a

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    72/113

    72

    E . 76 =

    =

    . 77 =

    = S b E . 76 a . 78 E . 53

    . 78 = + +

    =

    = = . 78 ca b b

    . 79

    = T ac a a c , . 56, ca a , a a a , b

    a b a c c .

    . 80 = = H = a a ca ac [ ]

    LFC = ac c a LFC [ ] = ac [1]

    A = ac a a [2]Q b = a c a [3/ ]

    T a c acc b ca b . 3.

    . 81 = = B a a a a a , a a a a ca b c a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    73/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    74/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    75/113

    75

    /

    .1 T c a a c a c a ac a a c a

    J a a ca b F 58. F Ma 3 a A 2 a

    c a a a a a c a a . F D c a a c a b LFC a , H a a a ca ac

    acc ca c a .

    F 58: P J M 3 2010

    F 59: P J A 2 2010

    T c a a a a c a a a a a a a b a a c a a c . T a

    c a a a ab .

    Jmtkraft, 2010-05-03

    020

    4060

    80

    100120

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    time [h]

    p l a n n e

    d f l o w

    [ m 3 / s ]

    Hissmofors, 2010-05-03

    Katts trupefors, 2010-05-03

    Granbofors, 2010-05-03

    simulated Q0, 2010-05-03

    Jmtkraft, 2010-08-02

    050

    100150200

    250300

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    time [h]

    p l a n n e

    d f l o w

    [ m 3 / s ]

    Hissmofors, 2010-08-02

    Katts trupefors, 2010-08-02

    Granbofors, 2010-08-02

    simulated Q0, 2010-08-02

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    76/113

    76

    F 60: P J D 6 2010

    T a J a a a Tab 4.

    4: I J , / .

    Jmtkraft 2010-05-03 2010-12-06Hissmorfors Kattstrupefors Granbofors Hissmorfors Kattstrupefors Granbofors

    Q0 [m3/s] 180 180 180 350 350 350h0 setpoint [m] 2.25 0.1 0.1 2.25 0.1 0.1ep [p.u.] 0.1 1,0 1,0 0.04 1,0 1,0Pmin [MW] 8.13 3.55 1.3 35.6 35.6 29,0PminReg [MW] 8.8 3.8 1.3 39,0 37,0 30.2Pplan [MW] 16.25 11.4 4.7 60.6 50.1 18.7PmaxReg [MW] 32.3 14.5 13.3 65.3 59.4 23.1Pmax [MW] 33,0 14.8 13.3 68.7 60.6 23.1Regulation limit FDR FDR - FDR FDR -

    2010-08-02Hissmorfors Kattstrupefors Granbofors

    Q0 [m3/s] 280 280 280h0 setpoint [m] 2.25 0.1 0.1ep [p.u.] 0.1 1,0 1,0Pmin [MW] 8.13 3.55 1.3PminReg [MW] 8.8 3.8 1.3Pplan [MW] 12.7 7.6 3.1PmaxReg [MW] 32.4 14.5 13.3Pmax [MW] 33 14.8 13.3Regulation limit FNR FNR -

    .3 F Va a ac a a a a Ma 3, A 2 aD c b 6 2010. T a c a a Va a a

    a c c a a a c a , F 61, F 62 a F 63.

    Jmtkraft, 2010-12-06

    050

    100150200250300

    350400450

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    time [h]

    p l a n n e

    d f l o w [ m

    3 / s ]

    Hissmofors, 2010-12-06

    Kattstrupefors, 2010-12-06

    Granbofors, 2010-12-06

    simulated Q0, 2010-12-06

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    77/113

    77

    F 61: D M 3 2010

    F 62: D A 2 2010

    F 63: D D 6 2010

    T c a a A 2 a b c a c a aa . T a a a ac b

    050

    100150200250300350400

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 p

    l a n n e

    d d i s c h a r g e

    [ m 3 / s ]

    time [h]

    Vattenfall 2010-05-03

    Midskog, 2010-05-03

    Nverede, 2010-05-03Stugun, 2010-05-03simulated Q0, 2010-05-03

    0100200300400500

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 p

    l a n n e

    d d i s c

    h a r g e

    [ m 3 / s ]

    time [h]

    Vattenfall, 2010-08-02

    Midskog, 2010-08-02Nverede, 2010-08-02Stugun, 2010-08-02simulated Q0, 2010-08-02

    0100200300400500600

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 p l a n n e d

    d i s c h a r g e

    [ m 3 / s ]

    time [h]

    Vattenfall, 2010-12-06

    Midskog, 2010-12-06Nverede, 2010-08-02

    Stugun, 2010-08-02simulated Q0, 2010-12-06

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    78/113

    78

    a a , 1.1 P c a . T a a a 3/ b a M a b a a a

    (Da 2011) a ca a c a ac 150 3/ a a c .

    T a Va a a a Tab 5.

    5: I , / .

    VATTENFALL 2010-05-03 2010-12-06Midskog Nverede Stugun Midskog Nverede Stugun

    Q0 [m3/s] 310 310 310 500 310 310h0 setpoint [m] 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.05

    ep [p.u.] 0.1 1,0 1,0 0.1 1,0 1,0Pmin [MW] 56.95 10.7 24.09 99.87 36.6 24.09

    PminReg [MW] 62.25 10.7 24.10 103.07 36.6 24.10Pplan [MW] 74.31 33.9 24.1 118.8 53.1 38.33

    PmaxReg [MW] 92.1 35.7 47.93 152.13 66.6 47.93Pmax [MW] 97.4 35.7 47.93 155.33 66.6 47.93Regulation

    limit FNR - - FNR - -2010-08-02Midskog Nverede Stugun

    Q0 [m3/s] 390 310 310h0 setpoint [m] 0.5 0.05 0.05

    ep [p.u.] 0.1 1,0 1,0Pmin [MW] 56.95 36.6 24.09

    PminReg [MW] 59.15 36.6 24.10Pplan [MW] 92.92 42,0 30.56

    PmaxReg [MW] 95.2 66.6 47.93Pmax [MW] 97.4 66.6 47.93Regulation

    limit FNR - -

    .3 F F a a a , 2010 12 06. T a c aa a c a a c a a a

    c a a c ac (F 117, F 118 a F 119) b ab c a a a c c a a ac a .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    79/113

    79

    F 64: D F M 3 2010.

    F 65: D F A 2 2010

    F 66: D F D 6 2010 Q0

    T a F a acc a c Tab 6.

    020406080100

    120140160180

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    p l a n n e d

    d i s c

    h a r g e

    [ m 3 / s ]

    time [h]

    Fortum 2010-05-03

    Sveg

    Byaforsen

    KrokstrmmenLngstrmmenStorstrmmen

    020406080

    100120140160180200

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    w a t e r

    f l o w

    [ m 3 / s ]

    hour [h]

    Fortum 2010-08-02

    Sveg

    Byaforsen

    Krokstrmmen

    Lngstrmmen

    Storstrmmen

    jeforsen

    0

    50

    100150

    200

    250

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    p l a n n e d

    d i s c h a r g e

    [ m 3 / s ]

    time [h]

    Fortum 2010-12-06

    SvegByaforsen

    KrokstrmmenLngstrmmenStorstrmmenjeforsensimulated Q0

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    80/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    81/113

    81

    .1

    3 2010

    F a c a ab a b c a . T a b

    a ( . 4.9) a a ac a (T ca b a .

    F 67: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , M H , K G .

    F 68: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , M H , K G .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    82/113

    82

    F 69: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , A H , K G .

    F 70: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , A H , K G . LFC .15

    15 A ca ac a G a b b aa b a a c c 6.1.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    83/113

    83

    F 71: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , R ( H ), .

    F 72: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , R ( H ),

    .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    84/113

    84

    F 73: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , R H , KG . .

    F 74: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , R H , KG . .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    85/113

    85

    2 2010

    F 75: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , M H , K G .

    F 76: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , M H , K G .16

    16 A =16 ca c a a ca a ab , c 6.1.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    86/113

    86

    F 77: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , A H , K G .

    F 78: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , A H , K G . LFC .17

    17 A ca ac a G a b b aa b a a c c 6.1.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    87/113

    87

    F 79: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , R ( H ),

    .

    F 80: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , R ( H ),

    .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    88/113

    88

    F 81: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , R H , KG . .

    F 82: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , R H , KG . .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    89/113

    89

    2010

    F 83: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , M H , K G .

    F 84: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , M H , K G .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    90/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    91/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    92/113

    92

    F 89: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , R H , KG . .

    F 90: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , R H , KG . .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    93/113

    93

    F 91: A LFC .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    94/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    95/113

    95

    F 94: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , A M , N.

    F 95: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , A M , N. LFC .18

    18 A ca ac a S b a . F a a / S a b a a ca a a a bab

    a a a a . T a a b a a c

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    96/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    97/113

    97

    F 98: LFC = OFF, 2010 05 03 , R M , N .

    F 99: LFC = ON, 2010 05 03 , R M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    98/113

    98

    2 2010

    F 100: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , M H M , N .

    F 101: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , M M , N .19

    19 A =4 ca c a a ca a ab , c 6.1.

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    99/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    100/113

    100

    F 104: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 . R ( M , ),

    .

    F 105: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 . R ( M , ), .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    101/113

    101

    F 106: LFC = OFF, 2010 08 02 , R M , N .

    F 107: LFC = ON, 2010 08 02 , R M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    102/113

    102

    2010

    F 108: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , M H M , N .

    F 109: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , M M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    103/113

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    104/113

    104

    F 112: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 . R ( M , ), .

    F 113: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 . R ( M , ), .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    105/113

    105

    F 114: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , R M , N

    .

    F 115: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , R M , N .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    106/113

    106

    F 116: A LFC .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    107/113

    107

    .3 F F a a a , 2010 12 06. T a c aa a c a a c a a a

    c a a c ac (F 117, F 118 a F 119) b ab c a a a c c a a ac a .

    F 117: D F M 3 2010.

    F 118: D F A 2 2010

    F 119: D F D 6 2010 Q0

    Fortum 2010-05-03

    020406080

    100120140160180

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    hour [h]

    w a

    t e r

    f l w o

    [ m 3 / s ] Sveg

    ByaforsenKrokstrmmenLngstrmmenStorstrmmenjeforsen

    Fortum 2010-08-02

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    hour [h]

    w a

    t e r

    f l o w

    [ m 3 / s ]

    Sveg

    Byaforsen

    KrokstrmmenLngstrmmen

    Storstrmmenjeforsen

    Fortu]m 2010-12-06

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

    time [h]

    w a

    t e r

    f l o w

    [ m 3 / s ] Sveg

    ByaforsenKrokstrmmen

    LngstrmmenStorstrmmen

    jeforsenQ0 2010-12-06

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    108/113

    108

    2010

    F 120: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , M , B , KL , .

    F 121: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , M H , BK , L , .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    109/113

    109

    F 122: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , A , BK , L , .

    F 123: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , A , BK , L , . LFC

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    110/113

    110

    F 124: LFC F . .

    F 125: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , R ( ),

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    111/113

    111

    F 126: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , R ( ),

    .

    F 127: LFC = OFF, 2010 12 06 , R , BK , L , .

    .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    112/113

    112

    F 128: LFC = ON, 2010 12 06 , R , BK , L , . .

    F 129: A LFC .

  • 8/11/2019 Analysis of a Load Frequency Control Implementation in Swedish Run-Of-river Hydropower Stations - Andreas Wes

    113/113

    T a a b b S a K a , S a , Va a , F a J a a I a

    . F a LFC c ac b .

    C B c ; O a a D a Ba a c c / a c a c

    E L b ; C , IKT

    N a Da b c ; Va a P c

    Ka a a B a ; Va a R D

    J a P ; Va a R D

    R a Ka ; Va a R D

    R H ; Va a H

    J a A a ; Va a A O a N c

    E B ; F G a

    Ma J ; E D

    A a W a ; E D