Analysis 02 as Per Sir

download Analysis 02 as Per Sir

of 55

Transcript of Analysis 02 as Per Sir

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    1/55

    Fiscal Year Investment Collectio GP IRR NPVProfitability

    No.of.A/c Expec IRR NPV

    Profitability

    2005-2006 170.52 390.00 219.48 143% 186.21 1.09 12 350 25% 92.44 0.26

    2006-2007 690.52 2150.00 1459.48 102% 1152.74 1.67 108 1140 25% 214.73 0.19

    2007-2008 1071.20 1920.00 848.80 85% 682.62 0.64 18 1580 25% 234.24 0.15

    2008-2009 752.40 1900.00 1147.60 39% 697.43 0.93 9 990 25% 105.38 0.11

    2009-2010 353.40 430.00 76.60 19% 32.37 0.09 4 460 25% 64.78 0.14

    2010-2011 60.51 120.00 59.49 207% 52.60 0.87 3 120.6 25% 30.07 0.25

    TOTAL 3098.55 6910 3811.45 2803.98 154 4641 741.651

    Table 4.1.1

    Determining Profitability, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return of Actual collections and

    comparing it with Expected Values (Outperformed Cases).

    Rs.In Crores

    Actual collection Projected Values

    Interpretation:

    From the above table it is inferred that, Fiscal year 2006-07 the companys profitability was high up to 1.67 whereas the

    expected profitability is only 0.19, but in 2009-10 it has performed below the expected values in all three cases like NPV, IRR,

    and Profitability though the No. of cases are few.

    Fiscal year 2006-07 has recorded the highest actual collections as Rs.2150 crore against the expected value as Rs.1140

    crore for the fixed IRR rate. Similarly in terms of NPV the 2006-07 year holds the top position, but fiscal year 2010-11 has

    recorded the highest IRR.

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    2/55

    CHART 4.1.1

    0.00

    500.00

    1000.00

    1500.00

    2000.00

    2500.00

    Value

    Year

    Comparing Actual collection with Proected

    Values (Outperformed Cases).

    Collection

    Expected Values

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    3/55

    Fiscal Year Investment Collection GP F/Coll IRR NPV

    Profita

    bility

    No.o

    f.A/c

    Expe

    ctedValu

    es IRR NPV Profitability

    2005-2006 1002.5 2970.02 1967.52 1630.12 89% 1660.04 1.66 5 2010 25% 507.73 0.25

    2006-2007 332.2 940.2 608.00 580.1 50% 402.60 1.21 70 580 25% 103.45 0.18

    2007-2008 530.1 1370.05 839.95 380 81% 644.62 1.22 35 940 25% 175.95 0.19

    2008-2009 1060.89 1540.1 479.21 520.12 24% 193.88 0.18 5 1720 25% 288.45 0.17

    2009-2010 126.9 160 33.10 140.12 15% 9.61 0.08 2 230 25% 45.99 0.20

    2010-2011 200.52 230 29.48 420.12 21% 13.60 0.07 4 330 25% 59.41 0.18

    TOTAL 3253.11 7210.37 3957.26 3670.58 2924.35 121 5810 1181

    Table 4.1.2

    Determining Profitability, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return of Actual collections and

    comparing it with Expected Values (Successful ongoing Cases)

    Rs.In Crores

    Actual collection Projected Values

    Interpretation:

    From the above table, it is clearly understood that the actual collections for the year 2005-06 stands high when compare to the

    consecutive years and also with its expected value.During the Fiscal year 2008-2011 the actual collections is less when compared to the Expected values since the No. of Accounts are

    lesser than the previous years.

    The profitability decreases gradually year on year from 1.66 to 0.07 respectively, since the NPV and IRR flows downwards.

    The over all view says that the 2005-06 year is performing well though the collections in the future is also expected as Rs.1630 crore.

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    4/55

    CHART 4.1.2

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    2005-20062006-20072007-20082008-20092009-20102010-2011

    value

    Year

    Comparing Actual collection with Proected

    Values (Successful ongoing Cases)

    Collection

    Expected Values

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    5/55

    Fiscal Year InvestmentCollection F/Coll SOH

    No.of.A/

    c Expecte IRR NPV

    2005-2006 20.2 10.1 40.25 20 1 . 39.5 25% 9.52006-2007 190 60.21 290.12 130.1 26 325.1 25% 103.9

    2007-2008 270.2 120 320.1 140.2 11 395.7 25% 56.7

    2008-2009 832.3 320.12 1170 510.1 11 1494.8 25% 290.5

    2009-2010 250.01 60.12 340.1 190.12 5 455.4 25% 92.1

    2010-2011 300.02 180.21 210.12 110.1 3 380.6 25% 46.0

    TOTAL 1862.73 750.76 2370.69 1100.62 57 3091.1 598.8

    Rs.In Crores

    Determining Profitability, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return of Actual collections and

    comparing it with Expected Values (Yet to Achive Cases)

    Table 4.1.3

    Actual collection Projected Values

    Interpretation:

    Compared with investments only a 50% of the Collections are made in all fiscal years and the remaining amount yet to be

    realized in the future.

    The amount invested in the year 2008-09 is high while comparing with other year.

    The No. of accounts is high in 2006-07. The Stock on Hire is shown under other current assets.

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    6/55

    CHART 4.1.3

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    Value

    Year

    Comparing Actual collection with Proected

    Values (Yet to Achive Cases)

    Collection

    Expected Values

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    7/55

    Fiscal Year Investment F/Coll No.of.A/c

    Expecte

    dValues IRR NPV

    2005-2006 0.123 10 5 7 25% 2.39

    2006-2007 770 1770.1 23 1342.9 25% 225.82

    2007-2008 890.12 2380.12 44 1321.1 25% 201.41

    2008-2009 550.12 830 25 1130 25% 298.87

    2009-2010 290.23 410.12 13 738.7 25% 214.18

    2010-2011 30.2 30.1 2 38.3 25% 4.62

    TOTAL 2530.793 5430.44 112 4578 947.29

    Actual collection Projected Values

    Table 4.1.4

    Interpretations:

    Total number of Saturated Accounts is 112 and those might be suspected as failure

    cases.

    Due to Global crisis in the year of 2007-2008 the number of NIL payers raised up to

    44, the same negative impacts are also found in other cases. Also Saturated Levelseems to be more in the same year due to more accounts.

    Rs.In Crores

    Determining Profitability, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return of Actual collections and

    comparing it with Expected Values (Saturated collection Cases)

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    8/55

    CHART 4.1.4

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Value

    Year

    Comparing Actual collection with Proected

    Values(Saturated collection Cases)

    F/Coll

    Expected Values

    Page 18

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    9/55

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 170.52 14% 0.14 20%

    Successful ongoing 1002.5 84% 0.84 75%

    Yet to achive 20.2 2% 0.02 -Nil collection 0.123 0% 0.00 -

    Total investment 1193.343 100% 1

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 690.52 35% 0.35 36%

    Successful ongoing 332.2 17% 0.17 8%

    Yet to achive 190 10% 0.10 -

    Nil collection 770 39% 0.39 -

    Total investment 1982.72 100% 1

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 1071.2 39% 0.39 33%

    Successful ongoing 530.1 19% 0.19 16%

    Yet to achive 270.2 10% 0.10 -

    Nil collection 890.12 32% 0.32 -

    Total investment 2761.62 100% 1

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 752.4 24% 0.24 9%

    Successful ongoing 1060.89 33% 0.33 8%

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Fiscal year - 2005-2006

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Fiscal year - 2006-2007

    Interpretations: Successful ongoing investments are High next to out perform,

    yet to achive cases and there is no saturated Accounts.

    Interpreatations: Due to Extrem levels of Successful ongoing investments in

    the year 2005-06 the outperformed cases in this financial year are high, Next

    to saturated collections, 2)successful ongoing cases and yet to achive Stands

    next respectively.

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Fiscal year - 2007-2008

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Fiscal year - 2008-2009

    Interpreatations: In this year there is almost equal sharing of Percentage ofAccounts between out performed and saturated accounts. This shows the

    gradual growth for better collections in the forecoming years.

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    10/55

    Yet to achive 832.3 26% 0.26 -

    Nil collection 550.12 17% 0.17 -

    Total investment 3195.71 100% 1

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 353.4 35% 0.35 7%

    Successful ongoing 126.9 12% 0.12 2%

    Yet to achive 250.01 24% 0.24 -

    Nil collection 290.23 28% 0.28 -

    Total investment 1020.54 100% 1

    Cases Investments Percentage Weight IRR

    Out performed 60.51 10% 0.10 21%

    Successful ongoing 200.52 34% 0.34 7%

    Yet to achive 300.02 51% 0.51 -

    Nil collection 30.2 5% 0.05 -

    Total investment 591.25 100% 1

    Interpretations: since most of the accounts in this financial year are New ones,

    that leads to the raise of yet to achive cases and successful ongoing cases up

    to 51%.and 34% respectively. This show that there will be a raise in the

    business and there are more chances of conversion from yet achive accounts

    to successfull on going cases.

    Fiscal year - 2010-2011

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Fiscal year - 2009-2010

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    Interpretations: as per the feedbacks of the past Fiscal year the other three

    successful ongoing, yet to achive and out performed cases have started

    performing well, this shows the positive sign in the reduction of saturatedaccounts.

    Interpreatations: the performance of this year was almost similar compared

    with 2007-2008, there is almost equal sharing of Percentage of Accounts

    between out performed and saturated accounts. The only difference is the yet

    to achive cases leads a half while compared with successfull on going

    accounts.

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    11/55

    Out performed

    14%

    Successful

    ongoing

    84%

    Yet to achive

    2%Nil collection

    0%

    Distrubution of the cases During 20

    2006

    Out performed

    35%

    Successful

    ongoing

    17%

    Yet to achive

    9%

    Nil collection

    39%

    Distrubution of the cases During 200

    2007

    Out performed

    39%

    Successful

    ongoing

    19%

    Yet to achive

    10%

    Nil collection

    32%

    Distrubution of the cases During 200

    2008

    Nil collection

    Distrubution of the cases During 200

    2009

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    12/55

    24%

    Successful

    ongoing

    33%

    Yet to achive

    26%

    17%

    Out performed35%

    Successful

    ongoing

    12%

    Yet to achive

    25%

    Nil collection

    28%

    Distrubution of the cases During 200

    2010

    O

    Successful

    ongoing

    34%

    Yet to achive

    51%

    Nil collection

    5%

    Distrubution of the cases During 2012011

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    13/55

    5-

    -

    -

    -

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    14/55

    -

    ut performed

    10%

    -

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    15/55

    Fiscal Year Investments Increase/Decrease

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value

    2005-2006 20.00 - 157.512006-2007 190.00 170 850.00 218.688

    2007-2008 270.20 80.2 42.21 279.866

    2008-2009 832.30 562.1 208.03 341.044

    2009-2010 250.01 -582.29 -69.96 402.222

    2010-2011 300.02 50.01 20.00 463.4

    Mean 310.46 5927.868

    S.D 274.39

    C.V 88.38

    Table 10

    Fiscal Year Collection Increase/Decrease

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value

    2005-2006 10.10 - 50.10

    2006-2007 60.21 50.11 496.14 80.11

    2007-2008 120.00 59.79 99.30 110.12

    2008-2009 320.12 200.12 166.77 140.13

    2009-2010 60.12 -260 -81.22 170.14

    2010-2011 180.21 120.09 199.75 200.16

    Mean 125.13

    S.D 112.03

    C.V 89.53

    Investments of Yet to achive cases cases from the fiscal year 2005 to

    2011 in Kotak Asset reconstructions divisions

    Collections of Yet to achive cases cases from the fiscal year 2005 to

    2011 in Kotak Asset reconstructions divisions

    Interpretations : the value of the investments in the fiscal year shows the raising trend and

    till the year 2017 is also seems to be raising as per the analysis and chart. This shows the Po

    business.

    Interpretations : the value of collections in this fiscal years is also shows the raising trend a

    projections, the trend till the year 2017 is also seems to be raising as in graph.

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    16/55

    Fiscal Year

    Treand

    Projections %

    2011-2012 524.578 9%2012-2013 585.756 10%

    2013-2014 646.934 11%

    2014-2015 708.112 12%

    2015-2016 769.29 13%

    2016-2017 830.468 14%

    69%

    Fiscal Year

    Treand

    Projections

    2011-2012 230.17

    2012-2013 260.18

    2013-2014 290.19

    2014-2015 320.20

    2015-2016 350.21

    2016-2017 380.22

    s per the projected trend

    itive growth in the

    d as per the calculated

    0.00

    100.00

    200.00

    300.00

    400.00

    500.00

    600.00

    700.00

    800.00

    900.00

    Value

    4.11 Trend lin

    0.00

    50.00

    100.00

    150.00

    200.00

    250.00300.00

    350.00

    400.00

    Value

    4.12 Trend lin

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    17/55

    Actual s

    Treand line

    Year

    for Investments

    Actual Collection

    Treand line

    Year

    for Collections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    18/55

    Year Investments

    Expected

    Values

    Actual

    Collection

    2005-2006 170.52 350.00 390.00

    2006-2007 690.52 1140.00 2150.002007-2008 1071.20 1580.00 1920.00

    2008-2009 752.40 990.00 1900.00

    2009-2010 353.40 460.00 430.00

    2010-2011 60.51 120.60 120.00

    Year Investment

    Expected

    Values

    Actual

    Collection

    2005-2006 1002.50 2010.12 2970.02

    2006-2007 332.20 580.00 940.20

    2007-2008 530.10 940.00 1370.05

    2008-2009 1060.89 1720.12 1540.10

    2009-2010 126.90 230.12 160.00

    2010-2011 200.52 330.00 230.00

    Year Investment

    Expected

    Values

    Actual

    Collection

    2005-2006 20.2 39.5 10.1

    2006-2007 190 325.1 60.21

    2007-2008 270.2 395.7 120

    2008-2009 832.3 1494.8 320.12

    2009-2010 250.01 455.4 60.12

    2010-2011 300.02 380.6 180.21

    Out performed cases

    Successful on going cases

    Yet to achive cases

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    19/55

    Correlation Correlation

    0.91 0.99

    Correlation

    0.86

    Correlation

    0.95

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    20/55

    Correlations

    Investments actualInvestments Pearson Correlation 1 0.906612879

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0.01267451

    N 6 6

    actual Pearson Correlation 0.906612879 1

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0.01267451

    N 6 6

    * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    21/55

    Year Investments Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 170.52 -

    2006-2007 690.52 520

    2007-2008 1071.20 380.68

    2008-2009 752.40 -318.8

    2009-2010 353.40 -399

    2010-2011 60.51 -292.89

    Mean 516.42

    S.D 386.74

    C.V 74.89

    CGR -19.39

    Table 2

    Year Collection Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 390.00 -

    2006-2007 2150.00 1760

    2007-2008 1920.00 -230

    2008-2009 1900.00 -202009-2010 430.00 -1470

    2010-2011 120.00 -310

    Mean 1151.67

    S.D 928.69

    C.V 80.64

    CGR -26.41

    Table 3

    Year Gross Profit Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 219.48 -

    Investments of out performed cases from the fiscal

    reconstructions divisi

    Collections of Out Performed cases from the fiscal

    reconstructions divisi

    Gross profit of Out Performed cases from the fiscal

    reconstructions divisi

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    22/55

    2006-2007 1459.48 1240

    2007-2008 848.8 -610.68

    2008-2009 1147.6 298.8

    2009-2010 76.6 -1071

    2010-2011 59.49 -17.11

    Mean 686.79

    S.D 517.29C.V 75.32

    CGR -17.52

    Table 4

    Year Realistic Collection Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 350.00 -

    2006-2007 1140.00 7902007-2008 1580.00 440

    2008-2009 990.00 -590

    2009-2010 460.00 -530

    2010-2011 120.60 -339.4

    Mean 773.43

    S.D 554.17

    C.V 71.65

    CGR -27.60

    Table 5

    Year Investments Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 1002.50 -

    2006-2007 332.20 -670.3

    2007-2008 530.10 197.9

    2008-2009 1060.89 530.79

    2009-2010 126.90 -933.99

    2010-2011 200.52 73.62Mean 542.19

    S.D 403.58

    C.V 74.44

    CGR -25.36

    Table 6

    Realistic collections of Out Performed cases from the fis

    reconstructions divisi

    Investments of Succesful ongoing cases cases from the fi

    reconstructions divisi

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    23/55

    Year Collections Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 2970.02 -

    2006-2007 940.20 -2029.82

    2007-2008 1370.05 429.85

    2008-2009 1540.10 170.05

    2009-2010 160.00 -1380.1

    2010-2011 230.00 70

    Mean 1201.73

    S.D 1036.10

    C.V 86.22

    CGR -40.19

    Table 7

    Year Gross Profit Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 1967.52 -

    2006-2007 608.00 -1359.522007-2008 839.95 231.95

    2008-2009 479.21 -360.74

    2009-2010 33.10 -446.11

    2010-2011 29.48 -3.62

    Mean 745.07

    S.D 802.87

    C.V 107.76

    CGR -58.65

    Table 8

    Year Realistic Collection Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 2010.12 -

    Gross Profit of Succesful ongoing cases cases from the fi

    reconstructions divisi

    Realistic collections of Succesful ongoing cases cases from

    Asset reconstructions div

    Collections of Succesful ongoing cases cases from the fis

    reconstructions divisi

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    24/55

    2006-2007 580.00 -1430.12

    2007-2008 940.00 360

    2008-2009 1720.12 780.12

    2009-2010 230.12 -1490

    2010-2011 330.00 99.88

    Mean 968.39

    S.D 742.23

    C.V 76.65

    CGR -27.39

    Table 9

    Year Investments Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 20.20 -

    2006-2007 190.00 169.8

    2007-2008 270.20 80.2

    2008-2009 832.30 562.1

    2009-2010 250.01 -582.29

    2010-2011 300.02 50.01

    Mean 310.46

    S.D 274.39

    C.V 88.38

    Table 10

    Year Collection Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 10.10 -

    2006-2007 60.21 50.11

    2007-2008 120.00 59.79

    2008-2009 320.12 200.12

    2009-2010 60.12 -260

    2010-2011 180.21 120.09

    Mean 125.13

    S.D 112.03

    C.V 89.53

    Investments of Yet to achive cases cases from the fisca

    reconstructions divisi

    Collections of Yet to achive cases cases from the fiscal

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    25/55

    Table 11

    Year Realistic Collections Increase/Decrease

    2005-2006 39.50 -

    2006-2007 325.10 285.6

    2007-2008 395.70 70.6

    2008-2009 1494.80 1099.1

    2009-2010 455.40 -1039.4

    2010-2011 380.60 -74.8

    Mean 515.18

    S.D 501.60

    C.V 97.36CGR 47.77

    Realistic collections of Yet to achive cases cases from t

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    26/55

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand ValueYear

    650.73 2005-2006

    304.95 597.01 2006-2007

    55.13 543.29 2007-2008

    -29.76 489.56 2008-2009

    -53.03 435.84 2009-2010

    -82.88 382.12 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand ValueYear

    1618.0952 2005-2006

    451.28 1431.5238 2006-2007

    -10.70 1244.381 2007-2008

    -1.04 1058.381 2008-2009-77.37 871.8095 2009-2010

    -72.09 685.2381 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Year

    934.1581 2005-2006

    ear 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

    ear 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

    ear 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    27/55

    564.97 835.2095 2006-2007

    -41.84 736.261 2007-2008

    35.20 637.3124 2008-2009

    -93.33 538.3638 2009-2010

    -22.34 439.4152 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-20132013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value

    1043.219

    225.71 935.304838.60 827.3905

    -37.34 719.4762

    -53.54 611.5619

    -73.78 503.6476

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Year

    834.6857 2005-2006

    -66.86 717.6854 2006-2007

    59.57 600.6851 2007-2008

    100.13 483.6849 2008-2009

    -88.04 366.6846 2009-2010

    58.01 249.6843 2010-20112011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    cal year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

    cal year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    28/55

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Year

    2335.3462 2005-2006

    -68.34 1881.899 2006-2007

    45.72 1428.4519 2007-2008

    12.41 975.0048 2008-2009

    -89.61 521.5576 2009-2010

    43.75 68.1105 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Year

    1668.7381 2005-2006

    -69.10 1299.2695 2006-200738.15 929.801 2007-2008

    -42.95 560.3324 2008-2009

    -93.09 190.8638 2009-2010

    -10.94 -178.6048 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value

    1587.6876

    cal year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

    the fiscal year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak

    sions

    al year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    29/55

    -71.15 1339.9699

    62.07 1092.2522

    82.99 844.5345

    -86.62 596.8168

    43.40 349.099

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Year

    157.51 2005-2006

    840.59 218.688 2006-2007

    42.21 279.866 2007-2008

    208.03 341.044 2008-2009

    -69.96 402.222 2009-2010

    20.00 463.4 2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    2013-20142014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Total

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value

    50.0981 Year

    496.14 80.1095 2005-2006

    99.30 110.121 2006-2007

    166.77 140.1324 2007-2008

    -81.22 170.1438 2008-2009

    199.75 200.1552 2009-2010

    2010-2011

    2011-2012

    2012-2013

    l year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

    ns

    year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak Asset

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    30/55

    2013-2014

    2014-2015

    2015-2016

    2016-2017

    Percentage of

    Increase/Decrease Treand Value Total

    286.9333

    723.04 378.2333

    21.72 469.5333

    277.76 560.8333

    -69.53 652.1333

    -16.43 743.4333

    e fiscal year 2005 to 2011 in Kotak

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    31/55

    Investments(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    170.52 -2.5 -426.3 6.25 650.73 3.5

    690.52 -1.5 -1035.78 2.25 597.01 4.5

    1071.20 -0.5 -535.6 0.25 543.29 5.5

    752.40 0.5 376.2 0.25 489.56 6.5

    353.40 1.5 530.1 2.25 435.84 7.5

    60.51 2.5 151.275 6.25 382.12 8.5

    328.40

    274.68

    220.96

    167.24

    113.52

    59.803098.55 0.00 -940.11 17.50

    Collection(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    390.00 -2.5 -975 6.25 1618.10 3.5

    2150.00 -1.5 -3225 2.25 1431.52 4.5

    1920.00 -0.5 -960 0.25 1244.95 5.5

    1900.00 0.5 950 0.25 1058.38 6.5430.00 1.5 645 2.25 871.81 7.5

    120.00 2.5 300 6.25 685.24 8.5

    498.67

    312.10

    125.52

    -61.05

    -247.62

    -434.19

    6910.00 0.00 -3265.00 17.50

    Gross Profit(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    219.48 -2.5 -548.7 6.25 967.37 3.5

    Treand Projections

    Treand projections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    32/55

    1459.48 -1.5 -2189.22 2.25 834.52 4.5

    848.8 -0.5 -424.4 0.25 701.67 5.5

    1147.6 0.5 573.8 0.25 568.82 6.5

    76.6 1.5 114.9 2.25 435.96 7.5

    59.49 2.5 148.725 6.25 303.11 8.5

    170.26

    37.41-95.44

    -228.29

    -361.14

    -493.99

    3811.45 0.00 -2324.90 17.50

    Investments(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    1002.50 -2.5 -2506.25 6.25 834.69 3.5

    332.20 -1.5 -498.3 2.25 717.69 4.5

    530.10 -0.5 -265.05 0.25 600.69 5.5

    1060.89 0.5 530.445 0.25 483.68 6.5

    126.90 1.5 190.35 2.25 366.68 7.5

    200.52 2.5 501.3 6.25 249.68 8.5132.68

    15.68

    -101.32

    -218.32

    -335.32

    -452.32

    3253.11 0.00 -2047.51 17.50

    Treand projections

    Treand projections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    33/55

    Collections(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    2970.02 -2.5 -7425.05 6.25 2335.35 3.5

    940.20 -1.5 -1410.3 2.25 1881.90 4.5

    1370.05 -0.5 -685.025 0.25 1428.45 5.5

    1540.10 0.5 770.05 0.25 975.00 6.5

    160.00 1.5 240 2.25 521.56 7.5

    230.00 2.5 575 6.25 68.11 8.5

    -385.34

    -838.78

    -1292.23

    -1745.68

    -2199.13

    -2652.57

    7210.37 0.00 -7935.33 17.50

    Gross Profit(Y) (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    1967.52 -2.5 -4918.8 6.25 1500.66 3.5

    608.00 -1.5 -912 2.25 1164.21 4.5839.95 -0.5 -419.975 0.25 827.77 5.5

    479.21 0.5 239.605 0.25 491.32 6.5

    33.10 1.5 49.65 2.25 154.87 7.5

    29.48 2.5 73.7 6.25 -181.57 8.5

    -518.02

    -854.47

    -1190.91

    -1527.36

    -1863.81

    -2200.25

    3957.26 0.00 -5887.82 17.50

    Treand projections

    Treand projections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    34/55

    Investments (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    20.20 -2.5 -50.5 6.25 157.51 3.5

    190.00 -1.5 -285 2.25 218.69 4.5

    270.20 -0.5 -135.1 0.25 279.87 5.5

    832.30 0.5 416.15 0.25 341.04 6.5

    250.01 1.5 375.015 2.25 402.22 7.5

    300.02 2.5 750.05 6.25 463.40 8.5

    524.58

    585.76

    646.93708.11

    769.29

    830.47

    1862.73 0.00 1070.62 17.50

    Collection (X) XY X^2 Treand value (X)

    10.10 -2.5 -25.25 6.25 50.10 3.5

    60.21 -1.5 -90.315 2.25 80.11 4.5

    120.00 -0.5 -60 0.25 110.12 5.5

    320.12 0.5 160.06 0.25 140.13 6.5

    60.12 1.5 90.18 2.25 170.14 7.5

    180.21 2.5 450.525 6.25 200.16 8.5

    230.17

    260.18

    Treand projections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    35/55

    290.19

    320.20

    350.21

    380.22

    750.76 0.00 525.20 17.50

    Treand projections

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    36/55

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 516.425

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -53.72028571

    The equation of the straight linea=SUM(Y)/N 1151.666667

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -186.5714286

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    37/55

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 635.2416667

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -132.8511429

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 542.185

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -117.0002857

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    38/55

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 1201.728333

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -453.4471429

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 659.5433333

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) -336.4468571

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    39/55

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 310.455

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) 61.178

    The equation of the straight line

    a=SUM(Y)/N 125.13

    b=SUM(XY)/SUM(X^2) 30.01

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    40/55

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    41/55

    0.00

    100.00

    200.00

    300.00

    400.00

    500.00

    600.00

    700.00

    Treand value

    -1000.00

    -500.00

    0.00

    500.00

    1000.00

    1500.00

    2000.00

    AxisTitle

    Axis Title

    Treand value

    1200.00

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    42/55

    -600.00

    -400.00

    -200.00

    0.00

    200.00

    400.00

    600.00

    800.00

    1000.00

    -600.00

    -400.00

    -200.00

    0.00

    200.00

    400.00

    600.00

    800.00

    1000.00

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    43/55

    -3000.00

    -2000.00

    -1000.00

    0.00

    1000.00

    2000.00

    3000.00

    Treand value

    -2500.00

    -2000.00

    -1500.00

    -1000.00

    -500.00

    0.00

    500.00

    1000.00

    1500.00

    2000.00

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    44/55

    0.00

    100.00

    200.00

    300.00

    400.00

    500.00

    600.00

    700.00

    800.00

    900.00

    2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20

    Treand value

    0.00

    50.00

    100.00

    150.00

    200.00

    250.00

    300.00

    350.00

    400.00

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    45/55

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    46/55

    Correlations

    0.906613

    Treand value

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    47/55

    Treand value

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    48/55

    Treand value

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    49/55

    13 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

    Treand value

    Treand value

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    50/55

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    51/55

    Fiscal Year Investment Collection % Expected Values %

    2005-2006 170.52 390.00 6% 350 8%

    2006-2007 690.52 2150.00 31% 1140 25%

    2007-2008 1071.20 1920.00 28% 1580 34%

    2008-2009 752.40 1900.00 27% 990 21%

    2009-2010 353.40 430.00 6% 460 10%

    2010-2011 60.51 120.00 2% 120.6 3%TOTAL 3098.55 6910 100% 4640.6 100%

    Fiscal Year Investment Collection Expected Values Diference Between Actual and Expect

    2005-2006 1002.5 2970.02 2010.12 959.9

    2006-2007 332.2 940.2 580 360.2

    2007-2008 530.1 1370.05 940 430.05

    2008-2009 1060.89 1540.1 1720.12 -180.02

    2009-2010 126.9 160 230.12 -70.12

    2010-2011 200.52 230 330 -100

    TOTAL 3253.11 7210.37 5810.36 1400.01

    Fiscal Year Investment Collection Expected Values Diference Between Actual and Expect

    2005-2006 20.2 10.1 39.5 -29.4

    2006-2007 190 60.21 325.1 -264.89

    2007-2008 270.2 120 395.7 -275.7

    2008-2009 832.3 320.12 1494.8 -1174.68

    2009-2010 250.01 60.12 455.4 -395.28

    2010-2011 300.02 180.21 380.6 -200.39

    TOTAL 1862.73 750.76 3091.1 -2340.34

    %

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    52/55

    Diference Between Actual and Expected collections

    40

    1010

    340

    910

    -30

    -0.62269.40

    ed collections

    ed collections

    8% 25%

    34% 21%

    10% 3%

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1 2 3 4 5 6

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    53/55

    Series1

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    54/55

    Cases Investments Percentage Investments Percentage Investments

    Out performed 170.52 14.29% 690.52 34.83% 1071.2

    Successful ongoing 1002.5 84.01% 332.2 16.75% 530.1

    Yet to achive 20.2 1.69% 190 9.58% 270.2Nil collection 0.123 0.01% 770 38.84% 890.12

    Total investment 1193.343 100.00% 1982.72 100.00% 2761.62

    Percentage analysis of Investments

    2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-

    14%

    84%

    2% 0%

    Investments

    Out performed

    Successful ongoing

    Yet to achive

    Nil collection 9%

    39%

  • 8/4/2019 Analysis 02 as Per Sir

    55/55

    Percentage Investments Percentage Investments Percentage Investments Percentage

    38.79% 752.4 23.54% 353.4 34.63% 60.51 10.23%

    19.20% 1060.89 33.20% 126.9 12.43% 200.52 33.91%

    9.78% 832.3 26.04% 250.01 24.50% 300.02 50.74%32.23% 550.12 17.21% 290.23 28.44% 30.2 5.11%

    100.00% 3195.71 100.00% 1020.54 100.00% 591.25 100.00%

    2098-20102008 2008-2009

    35%

    17%

    Investments

    Out performed

    Successful ongoing

    Yet to achive

    Nil collection