ANALYSING THE DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS IN MUMBAI… · MUMBAI, INDIA MONIKA KUFFER ... For...
Transcript of ANALYSING THE DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS IN MUMBAI… · MUMBAI, INDIA MONIKA KUFFER ... For...
ANALYSING THE DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS IN MUMBAI, INDIA
MONIKA KUFFER ([email protected])
KARIN PFEFFER, RICHARD SLIUZAS, ISA BAUD, MARTIN VAN MAARSEVEEN
Source: Google Earth
� Global urbanization trends
� Data on slums – deprived areas
� Mapping slum areas
� Mapping the diversity of deprived areas
CONTENT OF PRESENTATIONOVERVIEW
� Mapping the diversity of deprived areas
� Some concluding remarks
15/07/201636th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
URBANIZATION RATESAFRICA – ASIA – LATIN AMERICA - CARRIBBEAN
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
URBAN POPULATION OF MEGA CITIES
Delhi population recently estimated by UN 25 million
2030 -> 36 million
15/07/201636th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
Indian census has three types of slums:
� “notified” by the Government
� “recognized” (not formally notified but recognized by the
Government)
� “identified” (at least 300 people or 60-70 households in congested
DEFINITION COMPLEXITY SLUMSEXAMPLE INDIA
� “identified” (at least 300 people or 60-70 households in congested
and unhygienic environments and lack basic services - visited
and registered by a Charge Officer) (Office of the Registrar
General & Census Commissioner, 2013)
� From 2001 to 2011 the census urban slum population decreased
from 26.3% to 17.4% (Office of the Registrar General & Census
Commissioner, 2013),
� Success of policy initiatives such as the Rajiv Awas Yojana
aiming at a ‘slum free India’ (Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty
Alleviation, 2010)?15/07/201636th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
� Several urban renewal projects, e.g. Sabarmati River
Front Development (SRFD), the Kankaria Lakefront
Development and the Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS)
project
� For implementing the projects around 29,000 centrally
located slum houses were demolished.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSEXAMPLE AHMEDABAD
located slum houses were demolished.
Households (when being “eligible”) were offered to be
resettled to a site in the urban periphery.
(Patel et al., 2015).
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
Source: Kotadiya, 2016
EXAMPLE OF RESETTLEMENTSAHMEDABAD (ROYCHOWDHURY, 2013)
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
WHERE ARE THE POOR – DEPRIVED – SLUMS?MUMBAI
� Municipal data often not up-to-
date
� Hotspots of poor extracted from
census data
0 52.5Kilometers
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
Multiple deprivation Index
Ward Boundaries
census data
� But, wards are heterogeneous
Kuffer, Pfeffer, Baud & Sliuzas (2013)
WHERE ARE THE POOR – DEPRIVED – SLUMS?MUMBAI
WorldView – 2
� VNIR: 1.8 m
(8 bands)
� PAN: 0.5 m
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
THE MORPHOLOGY OF DEPRIVE AREAS
Features Slum areas Formal built-up areas Size • Small (substandard) building sizes • Generally larger building sizes
Density • (Very) high roof coverage densities
• Lack of public (green) spaces within or in the vicinity of slum areas
• Low – moderate density areas
• Provision of public (green spaces) within or in vicinity of planned areas
Pattern • Organic layout structure (no orderly road arrangement and noncompliance with set-back standards)
• Regular layout pattern (showing planned regular roads and compliance with set-back rules)
Site characteristics
• Often at hazardous locations (e.g. flood prone, close to industrial areas, steep slope)
• Land has basic suitability for being built-up
• (Basic) infrastructure is provided
Kuffer, M., Pfeffer, K., & Sliuzas, R. (2016). Slums from Space—15 Years of Slum Mapping
Using Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 455.
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
characteristics industrial areas, steep slope)
• Proximity to infrastructure lines and livelihood opportunities
• (Basic) infrastructure is provided
METHODS Total
Number
(Percentage) Contour
model
Machine
learning
Object-based
approach
Pixel-based
approach
Statistical
model
Texture/
Morphology
Visual image
interpretation
Analysis of types of
informal/slum areas
0 1 1 0 1 1 2 6 (6.9%)
Correlation with socio-
economic indicators
0 0 1 3 0 0 1 5 (5.7%)
REMOTE SENSING PUBLICATIONS ON SLUM MAPPINGMETHODS
FO
CI
economic indicators
Identification of slum
areas
0 8 15 3 2 9 11 48 (55.2%)
Extractions of
roofs/roads (objects)
4 0 7 0 0 1 1 13 (14.9%)
Land use/cover
mapping
0 2 4 5 1 3 0 15 (17.2%)
Total Number
(Percentage)
4
(4.6%)
11
(12.6%)
28
(32.2%)
11
(12.6%)
4
(4.6%)
14
(16.1%)
15
(17.2%)
87 (100%)
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
Kuffer, M., Pfeffer, K., & Sliuzas, R. (2016). Slums from Space—15 Years of Slum Mapping
Using Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 455.
SLUM AREA MAPPING BASED ON IMAGE TEXTUREUTILITY OF GLCM VARIANCE - EXAMPLE AHMEDABAD
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFICATION EXTRACTION OF SLUM AREAS (HOMOGENEOUS URBAN PATCHES) IN MUMBAI
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
Kuffer, M., Pfeffer, K., Sliuzas, R., & Baud, I. (2016).
Extraction of slum areas from VHR imagery using GLCM
variance. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. and Remote
Sens., 9(5), 1830-1840.
Sub-types Indicators - Measure
Informal A
(squatter settlement, semi-
permanent)
� Structure of layout: irregular patterns, absence of
public green space
� Built-up densities: more than 80% of roof coverage
� Building size: small multi-family buildings
Informal B � Structure of layout: irregular patterns,, absence of
BUT HOW MUCH DO WE SIMPLIFY THE REALITY?DELHI DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS?
(squatter settlement most
precarious)
public green space
� Built-up densities: more than 90% of roof coverage
� Building size: no clearly identifiable buildings
� Site suitability: small encroachments
Resettlement colony like
(low standard formal
settlement)
� Structure of layout: regular patterns, clearly
identifiable road network, planned public green
space
� Built-up densities: more than 80% of roof coverage
� Building size: small multi-family buildings
� Distance: remote settlement
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
15/07/2016
DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS IN MUMBAIA FIRST TYPOLOGY
CLASS 1 CLASS 2 CLASS 3 CLASS 4 CLASS 5 Slum pocket Slum area, small
buildings Slum area, mix
small/larger buildings Basic formal and
chawls Formal areas
Size: Small roofs
Density: High
Patter: Organic
Size: Small roofs
Density: High
Patter: Organic
Size: Small-medium roofs
Density: Mix
Patter: Diverse
Size: Medium roofs
Density: High-medium
Patter: Some structure
Size: Large roofs
Density: Medium - low
Patter: Well structured
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
Patter: Organic Patter: Organic Patter: Diverse Patter: Some structure Patter: Well structured
INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM IMAGERYHOMOGENOUS URBAN PATCHES (HUPS)
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
METHODOLOGY MAPPING THE TYPOLOGY OF DEPRIVATION
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
LRM: Statistical
significant indicators
INDICATORS
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
15/07/2016
Indicators B Sig. Odds
ratio
GLCM
variance
41.456 .002 1.514
Constant -6.481 .000 .002
BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELPROBABILITY
CLASS INDICATORS B ACCURACY
Class 1 Built-up mean area
GLCM variance
1704.6
-290.4
Nagelkerke R2:
0.88
15/07/2016
GLCM variance
Built-up patch density
Constant
-290.4
-308.5
227.7
0.88
Class 2 GLCM variance
Land cover evenness
Built-up mean area
Constant
-265.4
645.0
415.8
-513.5
Nagelkerke R2:
0.98
Class 3 GLCM variance
Slope mean
GLCM second moment mean
Constant
-974.1
-492.9
-452.1
317.1
Nagelkerke R2:
0.97
Class 4 GLCM variance
Slope mean
GLCM entropy mean
Land cover evenness
Constant
624.87
-755.6
-149.5
427.1
-102.8
Nagelkerke R2:
0.87
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
MAPPING THE TYPOLOGY OF DEPRIVATIONOVERALL ACCURACY FOR BUILT-UP CLASSES 77%
In particular Class 3 and 4 have the omission and commission problems
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
BUT HOW MUCH DO WE SIMPLIFY THE REALITY?MUMBAI DIVERSITY OF DEPRIVED AREAS?
15/07/201636th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016
CLUSTER OF DEPRIVATION ACROSS WARD BOUNDARIESHEIGHT INDICATES THE VALUE OF DEPRIVATION (BASED ON CENSUS DATA)
36th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016 15/07/2016
� In particular pattern and environment indictors play an important role
to map the typology of deprivation
� The deprived classes have fuzzy boundaries, which are difficult to
capture on ground as well as via morphological indicators.
CONCLUDING REMARKS RAPID DEVELOPMENT TRENDS NEED TIMELY DATA
� Census data at administrative units are commonly “geographically
meaningless” and “smooth local variability”.
� For many planning questions (hazard, transport, planning
interventions) disaggregated spatial data on deprivation is important.
15/07/201636th EARSeL Symposium - M. Kuffer, 2016