Analysing double page

4
Analysing Double Page Spread-out Masthead, Page numbers, Colour, Font?

Transcript of Analysing double page

Analysing Double Page Spread-out

Masthead, Page numbers,

Colour,Font?

This is a really good double page spread out. The writing, colour and image fits really well with each other.

The image is really eye-catching. Its bold and interesting and each person is looking at the camera.

There is no disadvantages of this as it looks very professional and well laid out. However, there are so many good points on this, such as the catchy cover line, in red, which stands it out and the capital letters in the text.

The caption is really good, and it includes page numbers which are key in a magazine.

The images in this double page are awful in my opinion. There is too much background distraction and colour, which doesn’t fit well with the writing and quotes from each person.

There is too much colours which makes the page look really packed. The smaller images are bad quality, like too squished or the lighting is too dark.

There isn’t enough writing for a double page spread out. There should be a lot more written information than that as from what I can read, it doesn’t tell you anything really interesting about the people.

The use of page numbers are okay, but I didn’t notice them at first because they don’t seem to stand out.

The lay out on this double page spread out doesn’t link. The image doesn’t fit with the writing as there's no interaction. If the picture was places in a different position and not separated onto the next page the in would work better.

The background colour of the left hand side shouldn’t be black, I think that’s what is making the image and the text not link.

The image has really bad lighting. There's nothing really eye-catching or standing out in it as the quality of the photo is very poor. The masthead is very good though as it stands out, but there is no cover line to interest you to read more. Also, there are no page numbers, which are key to a magazine!