Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

22
DIGESTER OPTIMIZATION Becky Larson April 5, 2013

description

Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67744 A study was conducted to assess the performance of various mixing regimes on methanogen biomass content in anaerobic digesters. Methane production in anaerobic digesters is directly related to the methanogens within the system. Current systems involve mixing to increase biogas production and system efficiency, however little is known about the underlying mechanisms of this relationship. In this study three pilot scale anaerobic digestion systems with three different mixing regimes were run with replication to examine the impacts to methanogen biomass content and biogas production. The results will provide insight for operational recommendations as well as the basic microbial processes with digestion systems which are critical for optimization.

Transcript of Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Page 1: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

DIGESTER OPTIMIZATIONBecky Larson

April 5, 2013

Page 2: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Why install a digester?• Energy independence• Reductions in green house gases• Flexibility in manure management • Reduced odors & pathogens• Reduction in other environmental impacts• Potential for additional asset streams (?)

• Bedding• Tipping fees• Environmental credits

• Do I dare say profits?• What can’t digesters do?

Page 3: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S.

USEPA AgSTAR, 2011

Page 4: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

U.S. System Types

Page 5: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Why Optimize?

Page 6: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Anaerobic Digestion Process Flow

Slurry

Biogas

SeparatorDigestate

Filtrate (liquid)

Fiber (solid)

Feedstock's

Page 7: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Characterized by rapid bacterial growth

“Weak link” in the process of producing biogas

Goal?...Avoid inhibition, maintainstabilization!

Stage Three: Acetogenesis

Stage One: Hydrolysis

Stage Two: Acidogenesis

Stage Four: Methanogenesis

CO2 reducing methanogens

aceticiastic methanogens

acetogens(H2

producing)

fermentative bacteria

fermentative bacteria

PROPIONATE, BUTYRATE, etc.

(Short-chain volatile organic acids)

fermentative bacteria

fermentative bacteria

COMPLEX POLYMERS(Proteins, polysaccharides, etc.)

MONOMERS AND OLIGOMERS(Sugars, amino acids, peptides)

acetogens(H2 consuming)

H2 + CO2 ACETATE

CH4, CO2

Source: Syed Hashsham, PhD, lecture notes, Michigan State University

The Biological Process of Producing Biogas

Page 8: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Key Parameters

• Temperature – sensors, controls (~100°F, ~135°F)• pH (methanogens 6.4-8.2; manure = good buffer)• Microorganism populations • Feedstocks/Loading• Mixing• Limit Toxicity• Micro/Macro Nutrients• HRT – engineering design

Page 9: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Different Digester Organisms Result in Different Biogas Yields

Control = Seed biomass microbial communityActive = Different microbial community (bioaugmented)Source: Kaushik Venkiteshwaran, Ph.D. student, Marquette University

15% more methane

Page 10: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Anaerobic Digestion Feedstocks

Cheese Whey

Swine Manure

Dairy Manure

Cattle Manure

Cucumber Waste

Yard ClippingsMunicipal

Organics

Human Waste

Food Processing Waste

Vegetables

Grasses

Page 11: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Gas Yields of Different Feedstocks

Kestutis Navickas. 2007. Bioplin Tehnologija in Okolje,

Page 12: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Additional Substrates• What to use?• Avoid toxicity – trust your

supplier (now have brokers)• Producers range – smart ones

are cautious• Evaluate additional substrates• What will substrates do to the

digestate?• Rule of thumb – must be worth

more than the cost of spreading (some use the idea that tipping fees must be ≥ application costs)

• Load slowly

Electrical $ 420,000Bedding $ 275,000Fertilizer $ 440,000Heating $ 30,000Carbon C $ 125,000Tipping $ 75,000Tax Credit $ 40,000Total $1,384,000

Revenues from Digester

Page 13: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Examining Additional Feedstocks

Page 14: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Examining Additional Feedstocks

Page 15: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Cheese Whey and Cheese Whey Permeate

• Evaluated in triplicates• 0% (control – all manure), 20%, 40%, 80%, and 100%

substrate additions• Varying performance • Generally < 40% reached a maximum biogas production

Page 16: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Mixing• Microorganisms must come

into contact with the food • Benefits of mixing

• Speeding up the breakdown of the volatile solid

• Increase in biogas production• There is a cost associated

with mixing!• Still done on a trail and error

basis

Page 17: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Case Study: Optimizing a Small Scale Digester

Page 18: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Case Study• Don’t assume anything!• Make operators record EVERYTHING1.Verify temperature throughout tank2.Take measurements (pH, VS, COD, etc.) over time3.Don’t change things quickly, allow time to stabilize• Lower gas production than predicted• Made lots of changes to feedstocks and feed operations• Contemplated design changes• Retention time was too short, found through low

destruction • Increased temperature resulted in 2-3x the biogas

production

Page 19: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Destruction

Page 20: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Evaluating Toxicity – BMP’s

Page 21: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Take Away• Many things affect digester performance, optimize one by

one, may need to go back• Feedstocks need to be evaluated on an individual basis• Mixing is still a trail and error process• Digesters require operators and farm employees to

understand the system• Make the simple and low cost adjustments first, typically

have the highest pay back

• Future:• Mixing impacts to methanogens and modeling to reduce

build-up (we will finish eventually)

Page 22: Anaerobic Digestion: Co-Digestion and Operational Issues

Becky Larson

[email protected]

(608) 890-3171

Thank you!