An Update on Local Anesthesia for Pediatric Dental Patients

7
Go to: Go to: Anesth Essays Res. 2013 JanApr; 7(1): 4–9. doi: 10.4103/02591162.113977 PMCID: PMC4173488 An update on local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients Faizal C. Peedikayil and Ajoy Vijayan Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, Kerala State, India Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, Kerala State, India Corresponding author: Dr. Faizal C. Peedikayil, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, Kerala State, India. Email: [email protected] Copyright : © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Pain control is an important part of dentistry, particularly in the management of children. Behavior guidance, and dose and technique of administration of the local anesthetic are important considerations in the successful treatment of a pediatric patient. The purpose of the present review is to discuss the relevant data on topics involved, and on the current methods available in the administration of local anesthesia used for pediatric dental patients. Keywords: Local anesthesia, pain control, pedodontics INTRODUCTION Fearrelated behaviors have long been recognized as the most difficult aspect of patient management and can be a barrier to good care.[1 ] Administering local anesthesia by injection is still the most common method used in dentistry. However, there is a constant search for ways to avoid the invasive and often painful nature of the injection, and find a more comfortable and pleasant means of achieving local anesthesia before dental procedures. [2 ,3 ] Chemically, the local anesthetic agents in common clinical use today may be divided into two broad groups: (A) agents containing an ester linking and (B) agents containing an amide. The most commonly used local anesthetics for pediatric dentistry are the amide type agents. Lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine is preferred because of their low allergenic characteristics and their greater potency at lower concentrations.[4 ] Table 1 shows the dosage per 1.8 mL cartridge of lidocaine. Table 1 Dosage per dental cartridge Local anesthetic carpules also contain organic salts and may contain vasoconstrictors. Vasoconstrictors are used to constrict blood vessels, counteract the vasodilatory effects of the local anesthetic, prolong its duration, reduce systemic absorption and toxicity, and provide a bloodless field for surgical procedures.[4 ,5 ] The use of the vasoconstrictor will allow the maximum total dose of the anesthetic agent to be increased by nearly 40%.[6 ,7 ] Many agents have been employed as vasoconstrictors with local anesthetics. But none has proved to be as clinically effective as epinephrine.[6 ] The maximum dose of lidocaine and mepivacaine, without vasoconstrictors, recommended for children is 4.4 mg/kg body weight, and 7 mg/kg body weight for lidocaine with vasoconstrictors.[8 ] The average duration of pulpal anesthesia is 60 minutes for 20% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 50 minutes for 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin, and 25 minutes for 3% mepivacaine without vasoconstrictor. In 1 1

description

local anesthesia in pedodontics

Transcript of An Update on Local Anesthesia for Pediatric Dental Patients

  • Goto:

    Goto:

    AnesthEssaysRes.2013JanApr7(1):49.doi:10.4103/02591162.113977

    PMCID:PMC4173488

    AnupdateonlocalanesthesiaforpediatricdentalpatientsFaizalC.PeedikayilandAjoyVijayan

    DepartmentofPedodonticsandPreventiveDentistry,KannurDentalCollege,Kannur,KeralaState,IndiaDepartmentofOralandMaxillofacialSurgery,KannurDentalCollege,Kannur,KeralaState,IndiaCorrespondingauthor:Dr.FaizalC.Peedikayil,DepartmentofPedodonticsandPreventiveDentistry,KannurDentalCollege,Kannur,KeralaState,India.Email:[email protected]

    Copyright:Anesthesia:EssaysandResearches

    ThisisanopenaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNoncommercialShareAlike3.0Unported,whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.

    Abstract

    Paincontrolisanimportantpartofdentistry,particularlyinthemanagementofchildren.Behaviorguidance,anddoseandtechniqueofadministrationofthelocalanestheticareimportantconsiderationsinthesuccessfultreatmentofapediatricpatient.Thepurposeofthepresentreviewistodiscusstherelevantdataontopicsinvolved,andonthecurrentmethodsavailableintheadministrationoflocalanesthesiausedforpediatricdentalpatients.

    Keywords:Localanesthesia,paincontrol,pedodontics

    INTRODUCTION

    Fearrelatedbehaviorshavelongbeenrecognizedasthemostdifficultaspectofpatientmanagementandcanbeabarriertogoodcare.[1]Administeringlocalanesthesiabyinjectionisstillthemostcommonmethodusedindentistry.However,thereisaconstantsearchforwaystoavoidtheinvasiveandoftenpainfulnatureoftheinjection,andfindamorecomfortableandpleasantmeansofachievinglocalanesthesiabeforedentalprocedures.[2,3]

    Chemically,thelocalanestheticagentsincommonclinicalusetodaymaybedividedintotwobroadgroups:(A)agentscontaininganesterlinkingand(B)agentscontaininganamide.Themostcommonlyusedlocalanestheticsforpediatricdentistryaretheamidetypeagents.Lidocainehydrochloride(HCl)2%with1:100,000epinephrineispreferredbecauseoftheirlowallergeniccharacteristicsandtheirgreaterpotencyatlowerconcentrations.[4]Table1showsthedosageper1.8mLcartridgeoflidocaine.

    Table1Dosageperdentalcartridge

    Localanestheticcarpulesalsocontainorganicsaltsandmaycontainvasoconstrictors.Vasoconstrictorsareusedtoconstrictbloodvessels,counteractthevasodilatoryeffectsofthelocalanesthetic,prolongitsduration,reducesystemicabsorptionandtoxicity,andprovideabloodlessfieldforsurgicalprocedures.[4,5]Theuseofthevasoconstrictorwillallowthemaximumtotaldoseoftheanestheticagenttobeincreasedbynearly40%.[6,7]Manyagentshavebeenemployedasvasoconstrictorswithlocalanesthetics.Butnonehasprovedtobeasclinicallyeffectiveasepinephrine.[6]

    Themaximumdoseoflidocaineandmepivacaine,withoutvasoconstrictors,recommendedforchildrenis4.4mg/kgbodyweight,and7mg/kgbodyweightforlidocainewithvasoconstrictors.[8]

    Theaveragedurationofpulpalanesthesiais60minutesfor20%lidocainewith1:100,000epinephrine,50minutesfor2%mepivacainewith1:20,000levonordefrin,and25minutesfor3%mepivacainewithoutvasoconstrictor.In

    1

    1

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T1/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Vijayan%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T1/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/copyright.htmlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Peedikayil%20FC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F0259-1162.113977http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T1/mailto:dev@null
  • thepresentlocalanestheticagentsused,thesofttissueanesthesiaismorethanthatofpulpalanesthesia.[5]Attemptshavebeenmadetofindagentsthatreducethedurationofsofttissueanesthesia.However,nosuchreductionhasbeenobservedthus,theauthorsrecommendthat2%lidocainewith1:100,000epinephrinebeusedwhenadministeringlocalanesthesiainyoungchildren.

    Ifalocalanestheticisinjectedintoanareaofinfection,itsonsetwillbedelayedorevenprevented.[3]TheinflammatoryprocessinanareaofinfectionlowersthepHoftheextracellulartissuefromitsnormalvalue(7.4)to56orlower.ThislowpHinhibitsanestheticactionbecauselittleofthefreebaseformoftheanestheticisallowedtocrossintothenervesheathtopreventconductionofnerveimpulses.Insertinganeedleintoanactivesiteofinfectioncouldalsoleadtoapossiblespreadoftheinfection.[3,4,6,8,9]

    Safetyoflocalanestheticagentsandadversereaction

    Theinherentuseoflocalanestheticinjectionsallowspractitionerstousethemfrequentlywiththeconfidencethatadverseeventsarerare.[10,11]Themostcommonreactionassociatedwithlocalanestheticsisatoxicreaction,resultingusuallyfromaninadvertentintravenousinjectionoftheanestheticsolution.[8]Table2showstheadversereactiontocommonlyusedlocalanesthetics.

    Table2Adversereactionsofcommonlyusedlocalanesthetics

    Overdosereactionsareaparticularriskintreatingchildren.[5,6]Thedosageofthelocalanestheticdependsonthephysicalstatusofpatient,areatobeanesthetized,vascularityoforaltissues,andthetechniqueofadministration.Itisdifficulttorecommendamaximumdoseforchildrenbecausedosevarieswithfunctionsofageandweight.Forpediatricpatientslessthan10yearswhohaveleanbodymassandnormalbodydevelopment,themaximumdosemaybedeterminedbyapplicationofoneofthestandardformulas(Clarksrule).Inanycase,themaximumdoseshouldnotexceed7mg/kgbodyweightforlidocainewithepinephrineand4.4mg/kgforplainadrenaline.Toxicityoccursprimarilyinthecardiovascularandcentralnervoussystemthistoxicreactioncouldstimulateordepressthecentralnervoussystem.Stimulationofthecentralnervoussystemcancauseatoxicvasoconstrictorreaction,andthesignsandsymptomsaretachycardia,apprehension,sweating,andhyperactivity.Depressionofthecentralnervoussystemmayfollow,leadingtobradycardia,hypoxia,andrespiratoryarrest.[3,8,10,11,12]

    Epinephrineiscontraindicatedinpatientswithhyperthyroidism.[5]Itsdoseshouldbekepttoaminimuminpatientsreceivingtricylicantidepressantssincedysrhythmiasmayoccur.Levonordefrinandnorepinephrineareabsolutelycontraindicatedinthesepatients.Patientswithsignificantcardiovasculardisease,thyroiddysfunction,diabetes,orsulfitesensitivity,andthosereceivingmonoamineoxidaseinhibitors,tricyclicantidepressants,orphenothiazinesmayrequireamedicalconsultationtodeterminetheneedforalocalanestheticwithoutavasoconstrictor[5,10,11]

    Localanesthetictoxicitycanbepreventedbycarefulinjectiontechnique,watchfulobservationofthepatient,andknowledgeofthemaximumdosagebasedonweight.Practitionersshouldaspiratebeforeeveryinjectionandinjectslowly.[11]Earlyrecognitionofatoxicresponseiscriticalforeffectivemanagement.Whensignsorsymptomsoftoxicityarenoted,administrationofthelocalanestheticagentshouldbediscontinued.Additionalemergencymanagementisbasedontheseverityofthereaction.

    Allergicreactionstolocalanesthesiaarerare.Thelocalanestheticagentwiththehighestincidenceofallergicreactionsisprocaine.Itsantigeniccomponentappearstobeparaaminobenzoicacid(PABA).Crossreactivityhadbeenreportedbetweenlidocaineandprocaine.Allergiescanmanifestinavarietyofways,someofwhichincludeurticaria,dermatitis,angioedema,fever,photosensitivity,oranaphylaxis.[8,11,12]Emergencymanagementisdependentontherateandseverityofthereaction.[13]

    Patients,withahistoryofallergytoalocalanesthetic,whocannotidentifythespecificagentused,presentaproblem.Thepatientshouldbereferredforevaluationandtesting,whichwillusuallyincludebothskintestingandprovocativedosetesting(PVT).Forpatientshavinganallergytobisulfates,useofalocalanestheticwithoutavasoconstrictorisindicated.[8,13]Localanestheticswithoutvasoconstrictorsshouldbeusedwithcautionduetorapidsystemicabsorptionwhichmayresultinoverdose.[13,14]

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T2/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T2/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173488/table/T2/
  • Techniquesforadministeringthelocalanesthetic

    Controlofthechild'shead

    Topicalanesthesia

    Needlesizeandlength

    Durationofinjection

    Postoperativesofttissueinjury

    Failureinlocalanesthesia

    Alongactinglocalanesthetic(i.e.,bupivacaine)isnotrecommendedforthechildorthephysicallyormentallydisabledpatientduetoitsprolongedeffect,whichincreasestheriskofsofttissueinjury.[14]

    Paresthesiaispersistentanesthesiabeyondtheexpecteddurationinjuriestotheinferioralveolarnerve(IAN)andlingualnerve(LN)canbecausedbylocalanalgesicblockinjections.Thenerveinjurymaybephysicalfromtheneedleorchemicalfromthelocalanestheticsolution.Thepatientmayexperienceanelectricshockintheinvolvednervedistributionarea.Paresthesiaalsocanbecausedbyhemorrhageinoraroundthenerve.Reportsofparesthesiaaremorecommonwitharticaineandprilocainethanexpected,fromtheirfrequencyofuse.Mostcasesresolveineightweeks.[8,15]

    Patientmanagementwhileadministeringlocalanestheticinjections

    Inchildren,behaviormanagementiscriticaltothesuccessofdentalprocedures.Arelaxedandcalmchildduringtheadministrationoflocalanesthesiaisimportantforthesuccessoftheclinicalprocessaswell.[2,3,4]Manytechniqueshavebeendescribedformanagingchildbehaviorinthedentaloffice,includingbothpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalmethods.[5]

    Thereisnoperfecttechniquethatguaranteessuccessinanesthetizingallchildren.However,thereareafewkeyproceduresthataremutualtoalladministrationsthatmaybevaluabletothesuccessofalltechniques.

    Onceachildhasgrabbedthesyringeorbumpedtheoperator'shandanddriventheneedleintothetissueofthebone,itmaybetoolatetorespond,andalastingimpressionhasbeenmadeinthechild'smindrelativetopainassociatedwiththelocalanestheticinjection.[4]Therefore,someauthorsrecommendthatthepractitionershouldhaveacontrolofthechild'sheadandagoodfingerrest,tocontrolthesyringeincasethechildmovesorresists.Thedentalassistantshouldbepreparedtorestrainthechild'shand,gentlybutfirmly.[16]

    Theprimarygoalinusingtopicalanesthesiaistominimizethepainfulsensationofneedlepenetrationintothesofttissue.Thetopicalanestheticagentmustbeplacedondriedmucosaandleftinplaceforatleastoneminutetoachievemaximumeffect.Theonsetdurationoflidocaineis35minutes.Arecentstudywhichcomparedtheefficacyofcommonlyusedtopicalanestheticsdemonstratedthesuperiorityof5%EMLAcream(eutecticmixtureoflocalanesthesiacontaininglidocaineandprilocaine)overallothertopicalanestheticagents.Thetopicalanestheticbenzocaineismanufacturedinconcentrationsupto20%lidocaineisavailableasasolutionorointmentupto5%andasasprayupto10%concentration.Localizedallergicreactions,however,mayoccurafterprolongedorrepeateduse.Topicallidocainehasanexceptionallylowincidenceofallergicreactionsbutisabsorbedsystemicallyandcancombinewithaninjectedamide.[17]

    Ashort(20mm)orlong(32mm)27or30gaugeneedlemaybeusedformostintraoralinjectionsinchildren.Anextrashort(10mm)30gaugeneedlehasbeensuggestedformaxillaryanteriorinjections.Longneedlesarefrequentlyrecommendedforinferiordentalnerveblockanesthesia.However,theclinicalexperienceofmanydentistshasshownthatshorterneedlesareadequateandsafeespeciallyfortheyoungdifficulttomanagedentalpatients.[3,12]

    Injectionoflocalanestheticsshouldalwaysbemadeslowly,precededbyaspirationtoavoidintravascularinjectionandsystemicreactionstothelocalanestheticagentorthevasoconstrictor.[8,16]

    Selfinducedsofttissuetraumaisanunfortunateclinicalcomplicationoflocalanestheticuseintheoralcavity.Mostlipandcheekbitinglesionsofthisnatureareselflimitingandhealwithoutcomplications,althoughbleedingandinfectionmaypossiblyresult.[18]

    Caregiversresponsibleforpostoperativesupervisionshouldbegivenarealistictimefordurationofnumbnessandbeinformedofthepossibilityofsofttissuetrauma.

    Anumberoffactorscontributetothefailureoflocalanesthesia.Thesemayberelatedeithertothepatientortheoperator.Operatordependentfactorsare(a)badchoiceoflocalanestheticsolutionand(b)poortechnique.

    Patientdependentfactorsare(a)anatomicalvariations,(b)thepresenceofinfection,thatis,theacidicenvironment

  • preventsthelocalanestheticagentfromreachingandpenetratingthenerve,and(c)psychogenicfactors,thatis,severeanxietymayinfluencepainperception.[10,19,20]

    Whenalocalanestheticfails,generally,itisbesttorepeattheinjectionthiswilloftenleadtosuccess.Inthecaseofrepeatblockinjections,itiseasiertopalpatebonylandmarksatthesecondattemptastheneedlecanbemaneuveredinthetissuespainfully.[19]

    Conventionalmethodsofobtaininglocalanesthesia

    Infiltrationisthechoicetoanaesthetizemaxillaryteethsuccessfully.Inthiscase,theneedleshouldpenetratethemucobuccalfoldandbeinsertedtothedepthoftheapicesofthebuccalrootsoftheteeth.Thesolutionisdepositedsupraperiosteallyandinfiltratesthroughthealveolarbonetoreachtherootapex,asthealveolarboneinchildrenismorepermeablethanitisinadults.Alittlelocalanestheticmaybesufficienttoproduceanesthesiaofteeth.[21]

    Stretchingthemucosaoftheinjectionsiteandgentlypullingontotheobliquelyplacedbeveloftheneedleisrecommendedforbuccalinfiltrations.Insodoing,theinitialneedlepenetrationisshallow.Asmallamountofsolutionhastobeinjectedintothesuperficialmucosa.Afterafewseconds,theneedlecanbeslowlyadvanced12mmandafteranegativeaspiration,anothersmallamountofsolutioncanbedeposited.Thisshouldberepeateduntiltheremaininganestheticsolutioniscompletelyinjected.[21]

    Anesthesiaofthemandibularprimarymolarsmayusuallybeachievedbyinfiltrationinchildrenuptotheageoffiveyears.Afewstudieshaveevaluatedtheeffectivenessofmandibularinfiltrationasapossiblealternativetomandibularblockfortherestorationofprimarymolars.Nosignificantdifferencesbetweeninfiltrationandblockwerefound.Inaddition,thequalityofanesthesiawasnotsignificantlyrelatedtotoothlocation,age,ortypeofanestheticagent.[22]

    Mandibularblockisthelocalanesthesiatechniqueofchoicewhentreatingmandibularprimaryorpermanentmolars.Depthofanesthesiahasbeentheprimaryadvantageofthistechnique.Anesthesiaofallthemolars,premolars,andcaninesonthesamesideofinjectionallowsfortreatingmultipleteethofthesamequadrantatoneappointment.Fortheinferioralveolarblock,thechildisrequestedtoopenhismouthaswideaspossiblewhiletheoperatorpositionstheballofthethumbonthecoronoidnotchoftheanteriorborderoftheramus.Theneedleisinsertedbetweentheinternalobliqueridgeandthepterygomandibularraphe.[23]Thepositionoftheforamenchangeswiththechild'sage:Inayoungchild(4yearsoldandyounger)theforamenissometimeslocatedbelowtheplaneofocclusion.Inayoungchild,theforamenislocatedontheocclusalplane.Asthechildmatures,itmovestoahigherposition.[5,24]

    Thebarrelofthesyringeoverliesthetwoprimarymandibularmolarsontheoppositesideofthearchandparalleltotheocclusalplane.Inthiscase,asmallamountofsolutionshouldbeinjectedand,afteranegativeaspirate,theneedleshouldadvanceuntilbonycontactismade,verygentlyandslowly.Whentheinferioralveolarnerveblockmaynotadequatelyanesthetizetheteeth,longbuccalanesthesiaisrequired.Thisisachievedbyinfiltratingafewdropsoftheanestheticintothebuccalsulcusjustposteriortothemolars.[5,22]

    Theintraligamentaryinjectionisgivenintotheperiodontalligamentusingasyringespeciallydesignedforthepurpose.Intraligamentaryinjectionsalsocanbegivenwithaconventionalneedleandsyringe.Inthistechnique,theneedleisinsertedatthemesiobuccalaspectoftherootandadvancedinformaximumpenetration.Theneedledoesnotpenetratedeeplyontotheperiodontalligamentbutiswedgedatthecrestofthealveolarridge.A12mm30gaugeneedleisrecommended,andthebevelshouldfacethebone,althougheffectivenessisnotimpairedwithdifferentorientation.Intraligamentaryanesthesiahaslimitationsasaprincipalmethodofanesthesia,duetothevariableduration,buthasbeenusedtoovercomefailedconventionalmethodsorasanadjunct.[24]Intraligmentaryinjectionsproducesignificantbacteremiaandthereforeshouldnotbegiventoapatientattheriskofinfectiveendocarditisunlessappropriateantibioticprophylaxishasbeenprovided.[25]

    Theintrapulpalmethodachievesanesthesiaasaresultofpressure.Salinehasbeenreportedtobeaseffectiveasananestheticsolutionwheninjectedintrapulpally.Whenasmallaccesscavityisavailableintothepulp,aneedlewhichfitssnuglyintothepulpisusedandasmallamount(about0.1mL)ofsolutionisinjectedunderpressure.Therewillbeaninitialfeelingofdiscomfortduringthisinjectionhowever,thisistransientandanestheticonsetisrapid.Whentheexposureistoolargetoallowasnugneedletofit,theexposedpulpshouldbebathedinalittle

  • Computerizedlocalanesthesia

    Electronicdentalanesthesia

    Intraorallidocainepatch

    Jetinjection

    Goto:

    localanestheticforaboutaminutebeforeintroducingtheneedleasfarapicallyaspossibleintothepulpchamberandinjectingunderpressure.[26]

    Intraligamentaryanesthesiahasaroletoplayinlocalanesthesiainmoderndentistrybutitdoesnotfulfilalltherequirementsforaprimarytechnique.Aswithtraditionalmethodsofobtainingorallocalanesthesia,thealternativemethodsgenerallyaresafeifthepractitionerunderstandstheprinciplesfortheiruse.Alternativetechniquesforthedeliveryoflocalanesthesiamaybeconsideredtominimizethedoseofanestheticused,improvepatientcomfort,and/orimprovesuccessfuldentalanesthesia.Someofthesetechniquesaredesirable,especiallyininfants,children,adolescents,andpatientswithspecialhealthcareneeds,sincespecificteethmaybeanesthetizedwithlessresidualanesthesia(i.e.,avoiddiscomfortandpotentialselfmutilationofblockanaesthesia).Themandibularboneofachildusuallyislessdensethanthatofanadult,permittingmorerapidandcompletediffusionoftheanesthetic.Mandibularbuccalinfiltrationanesthesiaisaseffectiveasinferiornerveblockanesthesiaforsomeoperativeprocedures.Inpatientswithbleedingdisorders,thePDLinjectionminimizesthepotentialforpostoperativebleedingofsofttissuevessels.Intraosseoustechniquesmaybecontraindicatedwithprimaryteethduetothepotentialfordamagetodevelopingpermanentteeth.Also,theuseoftheperiodontalligamentinjectionorintraosseousmethodsiscontraindicatedinthepresenceofinflammationorinfectionintheinjectionsite.[5,10,16,21,27]

    Newtechniquesforobtaininglocalanesthesia

    TheWandsystemconsistsofadisposablehandpiececomponentandacomputercontrolunit.Thehandpieceisanultralightpenlikehandlewhichislinkedtoaconventionalanestheticcartridgewithplasticmicrotubing.

    Thecoretechnologyisanautomaticdeliveryoflocalanestheticsolutionatafixedpressurevolumeratioisregardlessofvariationsintissueresistance.Thisresultsinacontrolled,highlyeffective,andcomfortableinjectioneveninresilienttissuessuchasthepalateandperiodontalligament.WhiletheWandhasbeenshowntoreducethepainassociatedwiththedeliveryoftheanestheticsolution,thetimeinvolvedintheprocedureappearstonegatetheeffectivenessofthedeviceareviewofcomputercontrolleddeliverydevicesaswellasotheralternativeanesthesiadeliverymethodsfoundthattheyeachpresentadversesideeffectsandgenerallyaremoreexpensivethanconventionalmethods.[28,29]

    Theconceptofelectronicdentalanesthesia(EDA)involvestheapplicationofelectriccurrentthatloadsthenervestimulationpathwaytotheextentthatpainstimulusisblocked.AreviewoftheliteratureshowsasignificantreductioninpainobservedduringallthedentalproceduresconductedunderTENS(TENS:Transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulator).Thus,TENSshouldbeconsideredasausefuladjunctinthetreatmentofpediatricpatientsduringvariousminordentalprocedures.[29,30]

    TherearemedicalcontraindicationstotheuseofEDA:Patientswithapacemakerorcochlearimplant,heartdisease,seizuredisorders,orcerebrovasculardisease,headtumor,neurologicaldisordersinvolvingtheheadandneck(e.g.,Bell'spalsy,trigeminalandpostherpeticneuralgia,multiplesclerosis,orTourette'ssyndrome),skinlesionsorabrasionsontheface,andpatientswithabnormalbruisingorbleedingdisorder.[31]

    Theseareanestheticpatchescontainingalidocainebasethatisdispendedthroughabioadhesivematrixandapplieddirectlytotheoralmucosa.Thesepatchesareavailablein10and20%concentrations,eachcontainingapproximately23and416mgoflidocaineandcanreducethepainofinsertionofneedle.[29,32]

    Thisinstrumentwasdevelopedtoachievelocalanesthesiafordentalprocedureswithouttheuseofaneedle.Thisisaccomplishedbydeliveringtheanestheticsolutionunderhighcompressiveforces.Anumberofuncontrolledstudiesofneedlelessdeviceshaveexaminedadultandchildpatients,typicallyfocusingontheanestheticpropertiesofthedeviceused.Inthesestudies,thepercentageofpatientswhoobtainedsufficientanesthesiawiththedevicesrangedfromabout50toabout90%.[33]Traditionalinfiltrationwasmoreeffective,acceptable,andpreferred,comparedwiththeneedlelessinjection.[34]

    CONCLUSION

  • Goto:

    Goto:

    Localanesthesiaformsthebackboneofpaincontroltechniquesindentistryandhasamajorroleindentistryforchildren.Thereisaconstantsearchforwaystoavoidtheinvasiveandoftenpainfulnatureoftheinjection,andtofindamorecomfortableandpleasantmeansofachievinglocalanesthesiabeforedentalprocedures.Despitetherecentinnovations,theinjectionremainsthemethodofchoiceinprovidinglocalanesthesia.

    FootnotesSourceofSupport:Nil

    ConflictofInterest:Nonedeclared.

    REFERENCES

    1.MilgromP,ColdwellSE,GetzT,WeinsteinP,RamsayDS.Fourdimensionsoffearofdentalinjections.JAmDentAssoc.1997128:75666.[PubMed]

    2.DowerJS,Jr,SimonJF,PeltierB,ChambersD.Patientswhomakeadentialmostanxiousaboutgivinginjections.JCalifornianDentAssoc.199523:3440.[PubMed]

    3.SimonJF,PeltierB,ChanbersD,DowerJ.Dentiststroubledbytheadministrationofanestheticinjections:Longtermstressandeffects.QuintInt.199425:6416.[PubMed]

    4.TroutmanKC.PharmacologicManagementofpainandanzietyforpediatricpatients.In:WeiSH,editor.PediatricDentistryTotalPatientCare.Philadelphia,PA:LeaandFebbiger1985.pp.15662.

    5.WilsonSW,DilleyDC,VannWF,Jr,AndersonJA.Painandanxietycontrol(Partl:Painperceptioncontrol)In:PickhamJ,CasmassinnoPS,FieldHW,MctigueDJ,NowakA,editors.PediatricDentistry,InfancyThroughAdolescesce.3rded.Philadelphia,PA:WBSaunders1999.pp.10815.

    6.ScottDB,JebsonPJ,BraidDP,PrtengrenB,FrishP.Factorsaffectingplasmalevelsoflignocaineandprilocaine.BrJAnaesth.197244:10409.[PubMed]

    7.CannellH,WaltersH,BeckettAH,SaundersA.Circulatinglevelsoflignocaineafterperioralinjections.BrDentJ.1975138:8793.[PubMed]

    8.MalamedSF.HandbookofLocalAnesthesia.5thed.St.Louis,Mo:Mosby2004.Localcomplicationspp.2857.

    9.HershEV,HermannDG,LampCI.Assessingthedurationofmandibularsofttissueanesthesia.JAmDentAssoc.1995126:15316.[PubMed]

    10.MalamedSF.HandbookofLocalAnesthesia.5thed.St.Louis,Mo:Mosby2004.Pharmacologyofvasoconstrictorspp.4154.

    11.JeskeAH,BlantonPL.Misconceptionsinvolvingdentallocalanesthesia.Part2:Pharmacology.TexDentJ.2002119:3104.[PubMed]

    12.HaasDA.Anupdateonlocalanestheticsindentistry.JCanDentAssoc.200268:54651.[PubMed]

    13.ScottDB.Toxicitycausedbylocalanestheticdrugs.BrJAnaesth.198153:5534.[PubMed]

    14.YagielaJA.Adversedruginteractionsindentalpractice:Interactionsassociatedwithvasoconstrictors.JAmDentAssoc.1999130:7019.[PubMed]

    15.HaasDA,LennonD.A21yearretrospectivestudyofreportsofparesthesiafollowinglocalanestheticadministration.JCanDentAssoc.199561:319.[PubMed]

    16.AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistry(www.aapd.org)GuidelineonUseofLocalAnesthesiaforPediatricDentalPatients.ClinicalGuidelines,referencemanual.2009.availablefromwww.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/g_localanesthesia.pdf.

    17.KravitzND.Theuseofcompoundtopicalanesthetics:Areview.JAmDentAssoc.2007138:13339.[PubMed]

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12366885http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7248117http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1053919http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11977895http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7736335http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7499650http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7568718http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10332135http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4639822http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908846http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9188235http://www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/g_localanesthesia.pdfhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9051996
  • 18.ChiD,KanellisM,HimadiE,AsselinME.Lipbitinginapediatricdentalpatientafterdentallocalanesthesia:Acasereport.JPediatrNurs.200823:4903.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    19.BoronatLpezA,PearrochaDiagoM.Failureoflocoregionalanesthesiaindentalpractice.Reviewoftheliterature.MedOralPatholOralCircBucal.200611:E5103.[PubMed]

    20.WongMK,JacobsenPL.Reasonsforlocalanesthesiafailures.JAmDentAssoc.1992123:6973.[PubMed]

    21.OgleOE,MahjoubiG.LocalAnesthesia:Agents,Techniques,andComplications.DentClinNorthAm.201256:13348.[PubMed]

    22.WrightGZ,WeinbergerSJ,MartiR,PlotzkeO.Theeffectivenessofinfiltrationanesthesiainthemandibularprimarymolarregion.PediatrDent.199113:27883.[PubMed]

    23.OulisC,VadiakasG,VasilopoulouA.Theeffectivenessofmandibularinfiltrationcomparedtomandibularblockanesthesiaintreatingprimarymolarsinchildren.PediatrDent.199618:3015.[PubMed]

    24.MalamedSF.HandbookofLocalAnesthesia.5thed.St.Louis,Mo:Mosby2004.Anatomicalconsiderationspp.1734.

    25.RobertsGJ,HolzelHS,SuryMR,SimmonsDentalbacteremiainchildren.PedCardiol.199718:247.[PubMed]

    26.VanGheluweMS,WaltonR.Intrapulpalinjection.Factorsrelatedtoeffectiveness.OralSurg.199783:3840.[PubMed]

    27.MeechanJG.Howtoovercomefailedlocalanaesthesia.BrDentJ.1999186:1520.[PubMed]

    28.KoyuturkAE,AvsarA,SumerM.Efficacyofdentalpractitionersininjectiontechniques:Computerizeddeviceandtraditionalsyringe.QuintessenceInt.200940:737.[PubMed]

    29.BlantonPL,JeskeAH.Dentallocalanesthetics:Alternativedeliverymethods.JAmDentAssoc.2003134:22834.[PubMed]

    30.HarveyM,ElliottM.Transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforpainmanagementduringcavitypreparationsinpediatricpatient.ASDCJDentchild.199562:4951.[PubMed]

    31.DhindsaA,PanditIK,SrivastavaN,GugnaniN.Comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofelectronicdentalanesthesiawith2%lignocaineinvariousminorpediatricdentalprocedures:Aclinicalstudy.ContempClinDent.20112:2730.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    32.HershEV,HouptMI,CooperSA,FeldmanRS,WolffMS,LevinLM.Analgesicefficacyandsafetyofanintraorallidocainepatch.JAmDentAssoc.1996127:162634.[PubMed]

    33.RamD,PeretzB.Administeringlocalanaesthesiatopaediatricdentalpatientscurrentstatusandprospectsforthefuture.IntJPaediatrDent.200212:809.[PubMed]

    34.DabarakisNN,AlexanderV,TsirlisAT,ParissisNA,NikolaosM.Needlelesslocalanesthesia:ClinicalevaluationoftheeffectivenessofjetanesthesiaInjexinlocalanesthesiaindentistry.QuintessenceInt.200738:5726.[PubMed]

    ArticlesfromAnesthesia,EssaysandResearchesareprovidedherecourtesyofMedknowPublications

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10028738http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8952239http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745219/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11966886http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17072256http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/literature/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7775684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1740575http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19026918http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1815200http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22114450http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117947http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9007921http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8857658http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8960488http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220170/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12636129http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197315http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19159026