An Unique Opportunity - CONFEDEMconfedem.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IBERPOTASHwebConfede… ·...
-
Upload
phungtuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
5
Transcript of An Unique Opportunity - CONFEDEMconfedem.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/IBERPOTASHwebConfede… ·...
Phoenix Project
An Unique Opportunity
Madrid
10th of October 2013
2
2007
2009
2007
2011
Next: GRI 2014
Potash
3
Origin Raw Material
Finished Product Lack of Potash
Production Figures
4
Production SÚRIA Centre Main Products
2012 (103 t/y)
2015 (103 t/y)
2017 (103 t/y)
KCl (95,50%)
493 700 1.030
GMOP (95,50%)
200 630 (out of KCl)
1.000 (out of KCl)
NaCl (99,97%)
0 750 1.500
KCl ( 99,50%)
0 15 50
Potash Derivate (Fertilizer Grade)
0 0 50
Magnesium Derivate (98,5%)
0 15 25
De-Icing Salt 300 450 660
Flotation Plant
Raw Ore
River Water Compacting
Plant
Standard Potash 95,5%
Granular Potash 95,5 %
Muds
Brine Collector
Salt to Mountain
5
Global Flow-Sheet - + R&D&I CO2
CO2
Salt Plant
Salt 99,97%
White Potash 99,50%
Condensate
Potassium Derivates
Mena Magnésica
Magnesium Derivates
Productos de Relleno Inertes
CO2
Building, Cosmetics, Fertilizer
Energy
Multiplying Effect
6
Contractor Needs
2013
2013 Second Half
2014 First Half
2014 Second Half
Monthly Average
35 130 240 85
Surface Utilities
Item
2011
2015
2017
Yearly Average
Power (MW)
27.000 189.000 331.000
Yearly Average
Gas (MW)
55.000 121.000 168.000
Logistics Implication
Item
2012 2015 2017
Yearly Average
Tons Produced
954.000 2.200.000 3.200.000
Yearly Average
By Train By Boat
603.000 1.500.000 2.400.000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURES
LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURES
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT
Flotation Plant
7
Added Area: 2.500 m2
GMOP Plant
8
New Area: 1.600 m2 x 2
= 3.200 m2
SALT Plant
9
New Area: 7.500 m2 x 2 = 15.000 m2
Global Process
10
Pre-treatment Crystallization 1st stage
Crystallization 2nd stage
Crystallization 3rd stage
INDUSTRIAL SALT
INDUSTRIAL SALT
INDUSTRIAL POTASH
Raw Salt
Process Water
Crystallization 1st stage
11
Re-circulation
Heat Echanger
Crystallizer
Treated brine
Treated Brine
Vapour
Vapour
Condensate
Salt
Purge To 2nd Crystallizer
MVR
Main Crystallizer
12
Constructing Materials
13
Brine & Slurries < 75ºC Duplex minor grades Brine & Slurries > 75ºC Duplex / Alloy upper grades Heater Tubes Titanium grades Tube-sheets Alloy upper grades Heater Shells Duplex upper grades Plate type heaters Titanium grades Compression System Duplex upper grades Centrifuges Duplex minor grades Pumps According with brine criteria
Salt Quality
14
IBP IBP IBP IBP IBP IBPPilot Sample Pilot Sample Pilot Sample Pilot Sample Production Production
Ref Lab 1 Ref Lab 2 Ref Lab 3 Ref Lab 3b Expected Expectedppm ppm Sample 1 Sample 2 Spec Typical
Drying loss < 0,01 %Insoluble < 1000,0 4 21 "-" < 50 ppm 25Calcium 4,7 3,5 5,0 2,9 < 5 ppm 2,5Magnesium < 1,0 0,4 0,3 0,8 < 1 ppm 0,6Potassium 320 374 320,0 275,0 < 150 ppm 100Iron 0,91 0,4 0,8 0,9 < 1,00 ppm 0,5Fluoride 1,3 < 1Iodine < 5,0 < 1 0,1Barium 0,03 0,1 0,01 0,01 < 0,10 ppm 0,05Nickel 0,06 < 0,1 0,15 <0,07Copper 0,03 < 0,1 0,08 0,09 < 0,10 ppm 0,05Palladium < 0,05 < 0,1Tin < 0,01 < 0,1 <0,4 <0,4Manganese 0,01 < 0,1 0,01 0,02Mercury < 0,01 < 0,1 <0,01 "-" < 0,10 ppm 0,05Chrome 0,10 < 0,1 0,1 0,1 < 0,10 ppm 0,05Lead < 0,01 < 0,1 <0,2 <0,2Zinc 0,03 < 0,1 0,10 0,17Silver < 0,01 < 0,1Bismute < 0,01 < 0,1Cadmium < 0,01 < 0,1 < 0,03 < 0,03 <0,50 ppm 0,2
Salt Quality
15
IBP IBP IBP IBP IBP IBPPilot Sample Pilot Sample Pilot Sample Pilot Sample Production Production
Ref Lab 1 Ref Lab 2 Ref Lab 3 Ref Lab 3b Expected Expectedppm ppm Sample 1 Sample 2 Spec Typical
Arsenic < 0,01 < 0,1 < 0,3 < 0,3 <0,50 ppm 0,2Antimonium < 0,01 < 0,1Aluminium 0,05 < 0,1 0,04 0,16 < 0,25 ppm 0,1Ammonia < 1,0 1Total inorganic N < 2,0 <1,0 <1,0Boron < 0,50 <0,1 <0,1Beryllium < 0,01Cobalt < 0,01 <0,08 <0,08Cesium < 0,01Lithium < 0,01 <0,01 <0,01Molybdenum < 0,01 <0,08 <0,08Platinum < 0,05Rubidium 0,01Selenium < 0,02Titanium < 0,01 <0,03 <0,03Thallium < 0,01Vanadium < 0,01 <0,05 <0,05Zirconium < 0,01Sulphate 38 54 33 21 < 250 ppm 150Bromide 19 30 20 17 < 30 ppm 20
Potash Quality
16
Potash KCl > 99’5 %
Water content < 3 % ( < 0’1 % ) Ca2+ < 100 ppm Mg2+ < 10 ppm SO4
2- < 150 ppm Insoluble < 100 ppm
Na+ < 2500 ppm Particle size > 300 micres
Magnesium Derivate
17
Magnesium Ore Carbonation & Lixiviation
Precipitation Process Calcination Process
Hydration Process Pure Mg(OH)2
Mg Others
18
ESTRUVITA Mg2+ + NH4+ + PO4
3- + 6H2O ↔ MgNH4PO4·6H2O
% G-1.1-L G-1.1 M-1.1 T-1.1 H2O 6.9 7.0 7.5 8.9
MgNH4PO4·6H2O 53.0 36.0 30.3 43.5 Mg(OH)2 6.3 5.7 8.7 0.0
MgCO3·3H2O 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 CaHPO4·2H2O 7.1 21.3 20.7 14.2 CaSO4·2H2O 2.9 5.2 2.8 1.4
CaCO3 3.1 6.3 12.5 11.5 Insolubles 20.8 18.4 17.5 16.6
Origen DQO total pH Conductividad mg/l mS/cm
Muestra A1 Vitivinícola 3455 6.5 1.3 Muestra A2 Licorería 15857 1.5 17.2
Muestra Origen pH Conductividad
(mS/cm)
B1 Drenaje ácido de minería pirítica 2.7 5.3 B2 Lixiviado ácido vertedero 0.9 87.1 B3 Agua residual empresa galvánica 1.3 33.6
B4 Agua residual empresa galvánica 6.7 2.5
Lodo 1 Lodo 1 NaOH NaOH
Muestra B2 Muestra B3
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
1.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
Al Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Zn
% E
limin
ació
n
[Met
al] (
mg/
kg)
Inicial
Lodo 1
NaOH
% Eliminación (Lodo 1)
NaHCO3
19
CO2
Brine NaHCO3
???
NaOH
Na+, Mg2+, K+, Ca2+, SO4
2-, Cl-, HCO3
-/CO32-/CO2
pH = 7.5Tª y PIonic Strength
0102030405060708090
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Co
nve
rsio
n (%
)
Moles CO2
CO2
Na
012345678910
80
85
90
95
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
% d
e M
gCO
3 an
d C
aCO
3
NaH
CO
3 p
uri
ty
% de Ca and Mg removed
NaHCO3
MgCO3
CaCO3
Pressure (atm)Temperature (ºC)
pH
Materials Quality Control & Research
20
Stress Corrosion Cracking Forecasting
Works
21
Phoenix Making Space for a Greater Re-Birth
Summary
22
Phoenix will produce basic elements for the Chemical Industry
Phoenix is an Environmental Growth Project
Phoenix is a unique opportunity for the Bages county in Catalonia
Phoenix allows Growth and Well-being for IBP stake-holders
23