An Overview of Ammonia and Nitrogen Removal in · PDF fileAn Overview of Ammonia and Nitrogen...
Transcript of An Overview of Ammonia and Nitrogen Removal in · PDF fileAn Overview of Ammonia and Nitrogen...
Knowledge… Commitment... Integrity… at Your Service
An Overview of
Ammonia and Nitrogen Removal
in Wastewater Treatment
Tim Constantine, CH2M HILL Canada
February 19th, 2008
2
Presentation Overview
• Ammonia Removal
– Why remove it?
– Regulations
– Nitrification biochemistry and factors
– Design considerations and example
• N-Removal
– Why remove it?
– Regulations
– Denitrification biochemistry and factors
– Design considerations and example
• Return liquors from dewatering
4
Introduction
• Why removal ammonia?
– A nutrient, so can promote algae growth
– Can exert oxygen demand in receiver
– Free or un-ionized fraction is toxic to aquatic life
• What technologies remove ammonia?
– Breakpoint Chlorination
– Air stripping
– Ion exchange
– Biological methods
• Focus of this presentation will be biological methods
– Uptake of ammonia during biological growth (heterotrophs)
– Biological nitrification
5
Regulations and Basis for Limits
• In certain cases, effluent ammonia limits based on
limiting oxygen demand in receiver
• More often, limits set based on toxicity to aquatic life
• “Free” ammonia fraction is toxic:
– Chronic toxicity limit ~ 0.02 mg/L (after mixing in receiver)
– Acute toxicity limit ~ 0.1 mg/L (at end of pipe)
• Dissociation constant – pKa = 9.24
• Impacted by pH and temperature
• At pH 7.5, 15oC, about 1% of TAN is NH3-N– So to achieve 0.1 NH3, need to be below 10 mgN/L
NH4+ → NH3 + H+←
6
Nitrification Biochemistry
• Nitrification is a two-step reaction:
• More about the “nitrification reaction”:– Nitrifiers do not use organic carbon as basis for growth
– Building blocks for growth from alkalinity
– 4.57 g O2 consumed per g ammonia oxidized to nitrate
– Acid formed, consumes alkalinity, 7.14 g alkalinity per g NO3
– Nitrite intermediate almost never “stable”, nitrite oxidizers grow faster than ammonia oxidizers at typical WW temperatures
NH4+ + 1.5O2 → NO2
- + 2H+ + H2O AOB
NO2- + 0.5O2 → NO3
-NOB
7
What Impacts Nitrification?
• Alkalinity– Alkalinity is the carbon source for nitrifier growth
– Do not want to go below 50 mg/L as CaCO3, or pH ↓
– For 21 mg/L ammonia nitrified, require 200 mg/L alkalinity
• 7.14 x 21 +50 ~ 200 mg/L
• pH– Optimal pH for nitrification between 7 - 8.5
– pH below 6 can lead to inhibition
• Low Oxygen– Nitrifiers are strict aerobes, inhibited at very low DO levels
– As long as DO > 2 mg/L, little impact on nitrifier growth rate
8
What Impacts Nitrification?
• Inhibitory substances– Nitrifiers can be sensitive to a number of compounds
– Can impact growth rate
– Higher concentration = Lower growth rate or complete loss
– Classic example is free ammonia and nitrous acid inhibition
• Solids Retention Time (SRT) and nitrifier growth
– Concept of minimum SRT is really important!
Min. SRT = 1
µmax,N - bN
• If operating SRT > min. SRT, nitrification takes place
• If operating SRT< min. SRT, no nitrification
9
The Washout Phenomenon of Nitrification
5
10
15
20
25
30
Eff
lue
nt
Am
mo
nia
[m
gN
/L]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Solids Retention Time [days]
MinimumSRT
T = 12oC
DesignSRT
10
What Impacts Nitrification?
• Wastewater Temperature– Single greatest impact on nitrification
– Nitrifiers are much more sensitive to temperature than heterotrophic bacteria
– Drives the design sizing of aeration tanks in colder climates
11
Temperature Effect on Minimum SRT
5
10
15
20
25
30
Eff
lue
nt
Am
mo
nia
[m
gN
/L]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Solids Retention Time [days]
MinimumSRT
LowerTemp
HigherTemp
DesignSRT
12
Temperature Effect on Nitrification
10
Wastewater Temperature [oC]
12 14 16 18 20
2
4
6
8
10
12
So
lid
s R
ete
nti
on
Tim
e [
da
ys
]
Minimum SRT
Design SRT
13
Design Considerations for
Nitrification
• What do we need to select/determine?
– Bioreactor volume requirements
– Tank configuration
– Oxygen requirements
14
Bioreactor Volume for Nitrification
• Critical parameters for bioreactor volume sizing:
– Design aerobic SRT
– Raw wastewater characteristics
– Selected operating MLSS
• Selection of Design Aerobic SRT
– Almost always based on coldest wastewater temperature
– If good historical data available, use minimum week effluent
temperature
– Aerobic SRT selection might be impacted by effluent limits, but
not normally
– Typical coldest temperature in Ontario is 10oC
– In this case, design aerobic SRT of 8-10 days is typical
15
Bioreactor Volume for Nitrification
• Raw wastewater (or primary effluent) characteristics:
– Can have major impact on sizing of tankage
– Nitrifiers only make up ~1-2% of MLSS
– TSS/BOD feed to bioreactor is most important
– Should do rigorous review of historical data to determine design
characteristics
– For bioreactor sizing, look at peak month characteristics
– At times, peak month loading can coincide with minimum
wastewater temperature
• Good example is a university town, where population is higher in
winter/spring
– Peak month loading of 1.2x average annual is typical
16
Bioreactor Volume for Nitrification
• Design MLSS concentration:
– Optimal in terms of aeration tankage and secondary clarifier
sizing is 2,500 – 3,000 mg/L
– Higher MLSS values can be used, but usually means very large
secondary clarifier to account for higher solids loading
17
Design Example (Guelph Plant 4)
• Design Conditions:
– Average design flow = 22 MLD
– Minimum week WW temperature = 10oC
• Design Aerobic SRT = 9 days
– Average Primary Effluent cBOD5 = 140 mg/L
– Peak Month Loading factor = 1.3
– Design MLSS = 2,500 mg/L (2.5 kg/m3)
• Used process model, but simple design shown below
– MLSS yield (from model) = 0.9 mgMLSS / mg cBOD5
– ML Mass Required = 0.9 * (22 MLD) * (140 mg/L) * (1.3) * (9 d)
– ML Mass Required = 32,500 kg
– Volume = 32,500 kg / 2.5 kg/m3 = 13,000 m3
– HRT = 13,000 / 22,000 m3/d = 14 hours
18
Same Secondary Clarifier Size
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 3
Plant 4
Bioreactor VolumePlant 1 = 4,350 m3
Plant 4 = 13,000 m3
19
Bioreactor Oxygen Requirements
• Aeration is required for:
– Supply oxygen for biological processes
– Mixing
• For mixing, minimum requirements:
– Mechanical aeration = 5 W / m3 of tankage
– Diffused air = 0.3 L/s per m3 of tankage
• Oxygen specifically used for:
– Oxidation of organic matter (BOD)
– Nitrification
– Endogenous decay
20
SRT/nitrification Impact on O2 Demand
Ac
tua
l O
xyg
en
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
[k
gO
2/d
ay]
Solids Retention Time [days]
T = 20oC
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
WithoutNitrification
IncludingNitrification
21
Bioreactor Oxygen Requirements
• Other design considerations:
– Don’t forget about recycle streams
– Need sufficient oxygen transfer for to meet peak diurnal oxygen
demand during peak day loading
– Don’t forget about minimum mixing criteria, especially in last
pass of an aeration tank
– Consider using fine bubble aeration
22
Aeration Efficiency
0.8
1.2
1.6
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Efficiency
(kg O2/kWh)
Coarse Bubble
Spiral Roll
Mechanical
Aeration
Fine Bubble
Fine bubble aeration can reduce aeration energy by 25 to 50%
23
Bioreactor Oxygen Requirements
• Other design considerations:
– Don’t forget about recycle streams
– Need sufficient oxygen transfer for to meet peak diurnal oxygen
demand during peak design period
– Don’t forget about minimum mixing criteria, especially in last
pass of an aeration tank
– Consider using fine bubble aeration
– Consider providing DO sensors with feedback loop to blowers
24
DO Control can Provide Savings
5 10 15 20
Time (hours)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
Ae
rati
on
En
erg
y R
eq
uir
ed
(kW
)
No DO Control (47 kW)
With DO Control (35 kW)
25
Bioreactor Oxygen Requirements
• Other design considerations:
– Don’t forget about recycle streams
– Need sufficient oxygen transfer for to meet peak diurnal oxygen
demand during peak design period
– Don’t forget about minimum mixing criteria, especially in last
pass of an aeration tank
– Consider using fine bubble aeration
– Consider providing DO sensors with feedback loop to blowers
– Do provide tapering of air diffusers, typically:
• Pass 1 = 50% of O2 demand
• Pass 2 = 30% of O2 demand
• Pass 3 = 20% of O2 demand
27
Introduction
• Why remove nitrogen?
– A requirement for biological phosphorus removal
– High nitrate levels associated with methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome)
– A nutrient, can lead to growth “harmful algal blooms” and hypoxic conditions
• Many jurisdictions now have effluent TN limits:
– EU countries – 70-80% N removal but varies
– “Bubble Limits” in sensitive watersheds (e.g. Chesapeake Bay)
• Canada now has effluent nitrate limits
– 13 mg/L as nitrate ion after mixing
– Equivalent to 2.9 mgN/L nitrate
28
Nitrogen Removal Intro
• There are a number of technologies capable of removing
nitrogen:
– Breakpoint chlorination of ammonia
– Ion exchange (ammonia or nitrate)
– Air stripping of ammonia
– Biological removal
• How is nitrogen removed in biological systems?
– A certain amount of nitrogen is required for biomass growth
– By nitrification / denitrification
– By deammonification (Anammox)
29
Nitrogen Removal - Denitrification
• Denitrification is defined as growth of bacteria when nitrate is
used as the terminal electron acceptor:
• Different from aerobic growth in that nitrate is used instead of
oxygen
• Majority of heterotrophic bacteria in WW treatment can use
both oxygen and nitrate
• If oxygen is present, it will be used before nitrate
• Oxygen inhibits denitrification
Organic
Compound+ NO3 → Biomass + CO2 + N2
30
Consequences of Denitrification
• Reduction in total oxygen required, as part of organic
material is oxidized using nitrate
– Nitrification: 4.57 mgO2/mgN
– Denitrification: 2.86 mgO2/mgN } 63% savings
• Actual O2 savings depends on:
– Raw WW characteristics
– Process configuration and process design
• Alkalinity is formed during denitrification!
– Recover 50% of alkalinity lost through nitrification
– More stable pH, since alkalinity serves as pH buffer
31
Requirements for Denitrification
• Need nitrate to be formed
– Nitrate is formed during nitrification
– As long as system is nitrifying, this criterion is met
• Need “denit” or anoxic zone in system:
– Nitrate
– Bacteria
– Substrate
– No oxygen, but mixing to retain biomass in suspension
32
Anoxic
NO3→N2
The “Wuhrmann” process
Aerobic
NH3→NO3
• Process can virtually removal all nitrogen
• Substrate for denitrification via endogenous decay
• For high N-removal, anoxic zone very large
• In practice, re-aeration step is usually added
re-a
erat
ion
33
The “Ludzack-Ettinger” process
Aerobic
NH3→NO3
Anoxic
NO3→N2
• Readily biodegradable substrate used for denitrification
• Significantly higher denitrification rate compared to
Wurhmann
• Only removes nitrate associated with the RAS
• If RAS = Qave, 50% nitrate removal if carbon not limiting
34
“Modified Ludzack-Ettinger” process
Anoxic Aerobic
NH3→NO3NO3→N2
• MLE process includes recirculation to bring greater
quantities of nitrate back for denitrification
• Much higher levels of nitrate removal possible
• Very popular process alternative today
35
Impact of Recycle Rate on MLEN
itra
te R
em
ova
l [%
]
Recirculation Rate [% of influent flow]
100% 200% 300% 400% 500%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
36
4-Stage Bardenpho process
Anoxic Aerobic
• Combination of MLE and Wuhrmann process
• Very high levels of nitrate reduction possible
• External carbon source (methanol) often added to
increase second stage denitrification rate
Anoxic
re-a
erat
ion
MeOH
37
Design Considerations for
Denitrification
• Do not take away “required” aerobic SRT to provide
anoxic zones
– Unless providing only seasonal denitrification via “swing”zones
• Size anoxic zones appropriately and provide mixing
– Minimum SRT for MLE anoxic zone ~ 1.5 days
• Kinetics of denitrification are fairly complex, and very
dependent on nature of COD (readily biodegradable,
slowly biodegradable)
– Carry out raw wastewater characterization
– Use a process model to assist in design sizing
• Design “zones” to allow free flowing surface
• Minimize O2 return in recycle streams
39
Centrate Characteristics / Impacts
Parameter Centrate % of Influent
Flow: - 0.5%
TSS: 1,750 mg/L 4.0%
BOD5: 200 mg/L 0.5%
Phosphorus: 200 mg/L 19.0%
Ammonia: 1,000 mg/L 20.0%
Temperature: ~35ºC -
• Major impacts:
– Increased oxygen demand
– Increased carbon requirements for denitrification
– Can lead to bleed through of NH3 / NO3 if not equalized
40
Impact of Centrate on Performance
Se
co
nd
ary
Eff
lue
nt
Am
mo
nia
[m
gN
/L]
12:00 12:000:000:00
2
4
6
8
10
Time of Day
With Centrate addedover 8 hours
No Centrate
41
Centrate Management Alternatives
Centrate Management
Alternatives
Separate
Treatment
No Separate
Treatment
- Do Nothing
- Centrate Equalization
Biological
Treatment
Phys-Chem
Treatment
- Hot Air/Steam Stripping
- Ion Exchange
- Breakpoint Chlorination
- Struvite Precipitation
- Suspended Growth Activated Sludge
- Fixed Film
- Bioaugmentation (e.g. BABE®, InNitri®)
- Nitritation (e.g. SHARON®, AT-3, others)
- Anammox (deammonification)
42
Process Overview - Bioaugmentation
• What is it?
– Side-stream treatment process to treat centrate
– Produces enriched population of nitrifiers
– Nitrifiers seeded to mainstream plant
• Benefit:
– Reduce ammonia (nitrogen) load on mainstream plant
– Allows improved nitrification in mainstream plant
• A number of treatment processes:
– InNitri (Inexpensive Nitrification)
– BABE (Bio-Augmentation Batch Enhanced)
– Nitrification in RAS reaeration (ScanDeNi, Prague)
43
SidestreamSystem
DewateringCentrate
25oC30oC
Process Overview - Bioaugmentation
• Improved mainstream nitrification efficiency
• Typically allows 30% less bioreactor volume
• Requires supplemental chemicals
• Process still emerging – some full scale
installations
Influent
RAS
Effluent
Nitrifiers
Alkalinity/Methanol
PC Bioreactor SC
InNitri ProcessBABE Process
RAS
RAS reaeration
44
Bioaugmentation Benefits MainstreamE
fflu
en
t A
mm
on
ia [
mg
N/L
]
2
4
6
8
10
12
Mainstream Aerobic SRT [days]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Design basis: 10oC
WithoutBioaugmentation
Effluent with
Bioaugmentation
45
Process Overview - Nitritation
• What is it?
– Process that converts ammonia to nitrite (NH3 → NO2)
– “Partial nitrification” in side-stream system
• Benefits:
– Reduced O2 (25% less than full nitrification)
– Reduced chemicals (e.g. 40% less MeOH for denitrification)
– Less tankage than bioaugmentation
• A number of treatment processes:
– Solids retention time control (SHARON Process)
– Toxicity control (e.g. AT-3 process)
– Dissolved oxygen control
46
Process Overview - SHARON®
So
lid
s R
ete
nti
on
Tim
e [
da
ys
]
Temperature [oC]
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
1
2
3
4
5
AmmoniaOxidizers
NitriteOxidizers
NH3
NO3
NO2
47
Process Overview - Anammox
• Anammox:
Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation
• New organisms discovered - Anammox bacteria
NH4-N + NO2-N N2 + 2H2O
• Notable properties of anammox bacteria:
– Very low growth rate (1/10th that of nitrifiers!)
– Inhibited by oxygen even at very low levels
• Key: Generate both NH3 and NO2
48
Process Overview - Anammox
• Efficient N-removal:
– 60% savings in oxygen, 100% savings in carbon
• Long start-up, requires good solids retention
• Full-scale: Rotterdam, Strass
Influent
RASWAS
Effluent
Alkalinity?Methanol ?
DewateringCentrate
SHARONReactor
30oCNONO22
NHNH3330oC
N2
AnammoxReactor
49
Centrate Processes - Which is best?
• Example 1:
– Limitations in nitrification or denitrification capacity
– Low cost secondary treatment expansion
– Bioaugmentation may be best
• Example 2:
– No Limitation on nitrification or denitrification capacity
– Limitation in influent carbon or want to limit operating costs
– Nitritation or Anammox may be best
• Example 3:
– No major limitations in nit/denit capacity
– Equalization
50
Summary
• There will continue to be increased needs in
providing nitrification and N-removal
• Many options available for both systems
• Good process design practice should include:
– Raw WW characterization
– Process simulation
• Centrate treatment alternatives emerging, may solve
upgrade challenges for nitrification or N-removal