An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in...

20
An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools. Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Transcript of An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in...

Page 1: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate

and have it taught in American schools.

Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Page 2: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

First of all

• I’m a wannabe• …and not a scientist• …not yet a philosopher

either• …I also smell like

elderberries when the weather is moist

• …and if you can’t understand my accent, then fluergee-guergy-gurr

Page 3: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

What is evolution?

• Dembski doesn’t know:•“According to Darwinism, undirected natural causes are solely responsible for the origin and development of life.”•“Darwinism is hopelessly entangled with naturalism.”•“Darwinism rules out the possibility of God or any guiding intelligence playing a role in life's origin and development.”

Bad, Dembski! Bad!

Page 4: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

What I think evolution is

• Darwinian evolution by natural selection

• Those organisms or genes least likely to die in a given environment will therefore be the ones most likely to reproduce and eventually become quantitatively dominant.

Page 5: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.
Page 6: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Irreducible Complexity

• “A single system which is composed of several interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning.”

The man behind the Colgate smile is Michael Behe

Page 7: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

An Important Concept

Page 8: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Mammals that can’t produce vitamin C

Guinea pigs and us!

What d’ye mean, rum don’t cure scurvy? ‘course it does.

Page 9: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

• An arch bridge is Irreducibly complex

• But, of course, it’s not made all at once

Page 10: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

1. Scaffolding2. Improbable but possible happenstance3. ?

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

Page 11: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

• Suppose an adaptive ability requires two (or more) mutations in order to function and either mutation alone is useless. As long as mutation A confers no disadvantage it could still be acquired through neutral drift without mutation B, priming the organism for advantage if B should turn up later.• Already proven by Richard Lenski when some of his e-coli mutated to thrive on citrate.

Page 12: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

1. Scaffolding2. Improbable but possible happenstance3. Cooption or exaptation

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

Page 13: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

To the left: Type III secretory system used for pooping. To the right: flagellar motor used for pretending to be a speedboat.

Page 14: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Complex Specified Information

• What is it?• Nobody knows. No, really• Well, Dembski does• …maybe.

Page 15: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Argument From Ignorance

Page 16: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Inference to Best Explanation?• One white swan, two white swans,

three white swans…• Therefore all swans are white.• Only works if you count all the

swans• Evolution fails; therefore all

natural explanations fail; therefore supernatural explanation; therefore God

• Only works if evolution and God are the only possible explanations.

• “Explanation”?

Page 17: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Is it an explanation?

• Fire generally causes smoke.• Intelligence generally causes flagella?

Well, is it informative?

Is there a generalised connection?

• The house is smoking because there is a smoke-producing event going on inside

• The flagellum was produced by a flagellum-producing intelligence

Page 18: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

Intelligent DesignVs.

Platonic AssemblyDunn-dunn-duuuunn!

Page 19: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.
Page 20: An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools.

www.SketchSepahi.com

Questions?