AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

141
r *fl n 41P14SETO56 6 3.3035 MOND 010 AN EXPLORATION PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROPERTIES OFxAMAX POTASH LTD. TOWNSHIPS OF HALLIDAY, MIDLOTHIAN, FAWCETT, BURROWS S KNIGHT LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION W. R. Ryall Ph.D. Geologist Timmins, Ontario June 1972

Transcript of AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 1: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

r *fln

41P14SETO56 63.3035 MOND 010

AN EXPLORATION PROPOSAL

FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROPERTIES

OFxAMAX POTASH LTD.

TOWNSHIPS OF HALLIDAY, MIDLOTHIAN,

FAWCETT, BURROWS S KNIGHT

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

W. R. Ryall Ph.D. Geologist Timmins, Ontario June 1972

Page 2: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

41P14SE8856 63.3035 MOND 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l

II LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

III AMAX PROPERTY POSITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

IV PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS AND EXPLORATION PROGRAMS. . . . . . . 3

Halliday-Midlothian Twps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Burrows Twp. ..................... 5

Knight Twp. ..................... 6

Fawcett Twp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

V SUMMARY OF PROPOSED EXPLORATION PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . 10

VI FINANCIAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Page 3: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TABLE OF FIGURES

Fig. l Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After Page 2

Fig. 2 Location of claims in Halliday, MidlothianTwp. area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After Page 2

Fig. 3 Location of claims in Burrows Twp. . . . . . . . After Page 2

Fig. 4 Location of claims in Knight Twp. . . . . . . . After Page 2

\ Fig. 5 Location of claims in Fawcett Twp. . . . . . . . After Page 2

i*Fig. 6 Radem VLF Survey, Halliday-Midlothian Twp. . . In Pocket at Back

Fig. 7 Magnetometer Survey, Halliday-Midlothian Twp. In Pocket at Back

Fig. 8 VEM Survey, Burrows Twp. . . . . . . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

Fig. 9 Magnetometer Survey, Burrows Twp. . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

Fig. 10 Radem VLF Survey, Knight Twp. . . . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

Fig. 11 Magnetometer Survey, Knight Twp. . . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

X Fig. 12 Radem VLF Survey, Fawcett Twp. . . . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

Fig. 13 Magnetometer Survey, Fawcett Twp. . . . . . . In Pocket at Back

Page 4: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page l

I. SUMMARY

Ground geophysical surveys have defined conductive features

in four claim groups in the Shining Tree area, Larder Lake Mining

Division. Electromagnetic anomalies located in Halliday and Fawcett

Townships show coincident magnetic features whilst those situated

in Knight and Burrows Townships have no coincident magnetic features.

As the electromagnetic and magnetic anomalies lie within

greenstone assemblages similar to those hosting economic base metal

mineralization elsewhere in the Precambrian Shield, the anomalies

represent excellent targets for drill testing. To aid in best

siting of drill holes, a program of geological mapping and soil

geochemistry is recommended.

The proposed program is estimated to cost $30,923.00.

Page 5: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 2

II. LOCATION

The targets proposed for testing within this program are

located in the vicinity of the village of Shining Tree, which lies

some 70 miles southwest of Kirkland Lake. Specifically, claim groups

are located in Halliday, Midlothian, Burrows, Knight and Fawcett

Townships. (Fig. 1)

III. AMAX PROPERTY POSITION

Amax Potash Ltd. presently holds a total of 29 claims in

the Shining Tree area which are distributed as follows:

Halliday, Midlothian Twps. (17 claims)

L312902-312907 incl., L312910-312911, L312913, L312915,

L312917-312919 incl., L308795-308798 incl. (Fig. 2)

Burrows Twp. (4 claims) L308831, L312947, L312949, L312950 (Fig. 3)

Knight Twp. (4 claims) L316528-316531 incl. (Fig. 4)

Fawcett Twp. (4 claims) L308812, L308813, L308816, L308817 (Fig. 5)

Page 6: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Kirkland Lake Area

\ \ K IRKLAND tLV ' :y c, VX.I "XE^vO^""" Lev,., V\\ l i TtSCiUsJwSSit*".".'' -^y

Cobalt-Gowganda Area

Areas eligible for exploration assistance

Figure 1. Location of claim groups in the Shining Tree Area.

Scale l in = 20 mi.

Page 7: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

:N

AMAX POTASH LTD.

Location Map

HALLIDAY, MOND, MIDLOTHIAN, RAYMOND TWPSJ

Scale* l" s 1/2 Mi.

Figure 2

Page 8: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

'!W E/l s

•an Hsviod xvwv

N

Page 9: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

O 2ro

•D

X t) CO x H o

(D

•t*

-l m

r~ H

."O

NAT

AL

TWP

.

KN

IGH

T TW

P.

o

x H

Page 10: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Mac MURCHY TWP.

FAWCETT TWP.

AMAX POTASH LTD.

Location Map

FAWCETT TWP.

Scale' l" - 1/2Mi.

Figure 5

Page 11: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 3

IV. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS AND EXPLORATION PROGRAMS

(i) Halliday - Midlothian Twps.

Claims; L312902-312907 incl., L312910-312911, L312913,

L312915, L312917-312919 incl., L308795-308798 incl.

Access; Although several old logging roads extend close

to the claim group, bridges are in disrepair and

many swampy patches make float-equipped aircraft

the most feasible method of access for jobs not

requiring heavy equipment. Drill equipment would

best be moved in by crawler tractor from the Hydro

maintenance road which runs NS from the Matachewan

road (W extension of Highway 560).

Previous Work; Radem and VEM surveys have defined a conductive

anomaly some 10,000 feet strike length. In some

places the anomaly is double (Fig. 6). A ground

magnetometer survey has outlined a zone of narrow

magnetic anomalies, in part coincident with the

conductor (Fig. 7).

Geologically the Halliday conductor lies at the

southernmost exposed limit rhyolitic sequences of

the Halliday Dome. In this area the presence of

Page 12: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 4

graphitic units are known as a result of previous

drilling programs, notably by Cominco in 1965.

Cominco drilled three holes into a ground conductor

that appears to be very similar in character to

that outlined by the present surveys.

Though logs of the Cominco holes are brief, the

conductor is clearly due to graphitic units that are

interbedded with felsic volcanics and argillite.

The graphite characteristically hosts up to ID-12%

pyrite with less pyrrhotite (to 5%) and minor

chalcopyrite and, in one hole, galena. Volcanic

units typically contain minor pyrite and pyrrhotite

(combined to 5*3;) with chalcopyrite variously being

recorded present as "traces" and "blebs". Assay data

is not available to the present writer.

Graphitic-bearing tuffs and argillites at the margins

of felsic volcanic domes are of obvious interest for

the exploration of stratiform base metal deposits.

Proposed Program; A program of geological mapping and soil geochemistry

is proposed to assist in siting drill hole locations.

Initially, two holes are proposed for a total of

800 ft. of drilling.

Page 13: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 5

(ii) Burrows Twp.

Claims; L308831, L312947, L312949, L312950

Access; Old logging roads traverse this claim group and

make for routine access.

Previous Work; A Radem survey defined a conductor and subsequent

VEM survey, extending outwards from the area of

Radem coverage, indicates that the conductor bends

sharply from an E-W to a NW direction and continues

weakly for 3400 feet, although an alternative

interpretation is that part of the VEM conductor is

reflecting a long fault zone. The magnetometer survey

defined a number of probable diabase dikes although

a weak E-W magnetic feature may flank the conductor.

(Figs. 8 and 9)

Dacitic volcanic units predominate on this group

and are sheared in the vicinity of the conductive

axis. Chloritic alteration is common with sulphides,

generally pyrite with minor disseminated pyrrho

tite being frequently developed to about 5%. Locally,

but rarely, pyrite is developed to 25% though assays

returned from such specimens are typically very low.

(Assay No. 4956 gossanous pyritic volcanic 15% py:

Cu Nil, Zn .013; Ag 0.04 Oz/ton).

Page 14: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 6

Elsewhere on the group more basic volcanic units

are present and these host small syenitic intrusive

bodies and diabase dykes.

Paymaster Consolidated Mines are known to have

drilled three holes into conductors beneath Little

Marne Lake to the east of Amax holdings, in 1957

but no base metal intersections were made in this

drilling.

Proposed Program: Geological and soil geochemical surveys will be

utilized to site a drill hole designed to test

the conductor.

(iii) Knight Twp.

Claims; L316528 - 316531 incl.

Access; The claims in this township are situated on the

east shore of Pigeon Lake and no summer road is

available onto the group. Access for survey work

is gained by truck road to the west shore of

Pigeon Lake followed by canoe or boat to the claims.

Heavy equipment could be moved in by aircraft

directly to Pigeon Lake or, in winter, pulled

Page 15: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 7

from Highway 560 via winter road and lake crossing

directly to the set-up.

Previous Work; A Radem survey first detected the conductor on

the ground and, along with the fixed-transmitter

VEM survey, traced the conductor for approximately

4000 feet. The conductor strike swings arcuately

at the south end. The magnetometer survey outlined

a number of narrow magnetic anomalies, some of

which are sympathetic to the trend of the conductor,

while others, probably diabase dikes, trend

obliquely to the conductor. The conductor itself

is without any coincident magnetic anomaly (Figs. 10 St 11)

There is evidence of previous drilling in the

area but no set-ups near the conductors defined by

Amax surveys were noted. Several boxes of core

were found about 700 feet west of the conductor on

line 20 SE. The core is composed of a wide section

of graphite in a dacitic host. The graphite is

associated with pyrite (to 20!fc) and pyrrhotite (to 31).

Assays of graphite return Q.05% Cu, Q.23% Zn, 0.22 oz/ton Ag.

A 25 ft. section of serpentinite from the core yielded

only very weak nickel values (D.03% Ni).

Page 16: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 8

Proposed Program; Geological and soil geochemical surveys are planned

to aid in choice of a suitable drill site. At this

time one hole of 400 ft. is planned to test the

conductive zone.

(iv) Fawcett Twp.

Claims; L308812, 308813, 308816, 308817

Access; Survey access to the property is gained by following

the old mine road which leaves Highway 560 at a

point 2 miles east of Spruce Shilling camp and

then by canoe about a mile south along the West

Montreal River.

Drill access would best be gained by construction

of a road generally paralleling the river.

Previous Work; A Radem survey outlined a narrow bedrock conductor

with a strike length of 1600 feet. The conductor

is confirmed by the results of a VEM survey. Magne

tic coverage over the conductor outlined a magnetic

feature directly associated with the conductor (Figs. 12 S 13)

Sulphides, predominately pyrrhotite, are consequently

suggested as the cause of the conductor.

Page 17: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 9

No sign of any previous geophysical work or

drilling was observed, although several old claim

lines were encountered. While the conductor is

overlain by a shallow swamp, outcrop is abundant

elsewhere.

Geological mapping has not been carried out on this

group but a reconnaissance survey has revealed the

presence of a differentiated volcanic suite consisting

of rhyolite and andesite. No sediments were obvious.

The conductive feature is terminated to the E by a

diabase dyke.

The presence of a conductor in this geological

environment with a magnetic association is anomalous

in the Shining Tree area and warrants testing by

diamond drilling.

Proposed Program; The conductor can adequately be tested with a 450 ft.

drill hole, the location of which would be deter

mined with the aid of a soil geochemistry survey and

a related geological survey.

Page 18: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 10

V. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED EXPLORATION PROGRAM

The program of exploration proposed for claim groups in

the Shining Tree area which contain previously defined ground conductors

can be summarized as follows:

Phase l Geological mapping

Soil geochemistry

Phase 2 Diamond drilling

Estimates of diamond drilling are given below.

High costs, due to remoteness from established

or maintained roads are envisaged in Halliday,

Fawcett and Knight Twps.

Halliday Twp. - 2 holes, 800 ft. @ $12/ft = $9,600

Fawcett Twp. - l hole, 450 ft. @ $ 9/ft ~ $4,050

Knight Twp. - l hole, 400 ft. @ $12/ft = $4,800

Burrows Twp. - l hole, 400 ft. @ $ 8/ft * $3,200

TOTAL $21,650

Page 19: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 11

VI FINANCIAL ESTIMATE

GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Geologist 1 month

Geochemist 1 month

Assistant 1 month

Soil Geochemical Analyses

Geochemical consultant, interpretation, material and supplies

Aircraft charter

800

800

500

2500

700

200

DIAMOND DRILLING

5 holes (2050 feet)

Supervision

Geologist l month

Assays

Transportation and camp costs

GENERAL

Drafting, report preparation

Total direct cost

Overhead @ S 5!; of direct cost

TOTAL COST OF PROGRAM

21,650

1000

300

500

500

$29,450

1,473

Page 20: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

•HP14SEMS6 63.3035 M OND 020

VOLUME 1

FINAL REPORT OF WORK PERFORMED

IN HALLIDAY-MIDLOTHIAN, BURROWS, FAWCETT

AND KNIGHT TWPS. UNDER ONTARIO

GOVERNMENT MINERAL EXPLORATION

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

JULY 1972 - JANUARY 1973

W.R. Ryall Ph.D. Amax Potash Limited Timmins, Ontario

Copy l Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesCopy 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesCopy 3 Amax Potash Limited, TorontoCopy 4 Amax Potash Limited, New YorkCopy 5 Amax Potash Limited, Timmins

Page 21: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

41P14SE0056 63.3035 M OND 020C

TABLE OF

I. SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page l

II. INTRODUCTION......................................... Page 2

III. EXPLORATION PROGRAM 1972......,........,.,...,,..,... Page 2

(i) HALLIDAY-MIDLOTHIAN TOWNSHIPS

(a) Soil Geochemical Survey.................... Page 2

(b) Geological Survey.......................... Page 5

(c) Diamond Drilling...... .. . .....,. ....... ... . Page 6

(i i) BURROWS TOWNSHIP

(a) Geochemical Survey......................... Page 6

(b) Geological Survey.......................... Page 9

(c) Diamond Drilling........................... Page 10

(111) FAWCETT TOWNSHIP

(a) Soil Geochemical Survey.................... Page 10

(b) Geological Survey.......................... Page 13

(c) Diamond Drilling............................ Page 14

(iv) KNIGHT TOWNSHIP

(a) Geochemical Survey......................... Page 14

(b) Geological Survey.......................... Page'17

(c) Diamond Drilling........................... Page 17

IV. CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 18

V. APPENDIX I - SOIL GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS.............. Page 19

VI. VOLUME 2 - FIGURES A MAPS

Page 22: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure l

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

X Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

X Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 15

Figure 16

X Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Figure 21

X, Figure 22

Location Map......................,................. After Page l

Halliday-Midlothian Twp. property map............... After Page 2

Halliday-Midlothian Twp.-Zinc S Copper in Top Soil.. In Volume 2

Halliday-Midlothian Twp.-Zinc X Copper in Sub Soil.. In Volume 2

Halliday-Midlothian Twp.-Lead in Top Soil 8t Sub Soil.. In Volume 2

Halliday-Midlothian Twp.-Geological Map............. In Volume 2

Burrows Twp. property map........................... After Page 6

Burrows Twp. - Zinc X Copper in Top Soil............ In Volume 2

Burrows Twp. - Zinc S Copper in Sub Soil............ In Volume 2

Burrows Twp. - Lead in Top Soil fi Sub Soil.......... In Volume 2

Burrows Twp. - Geological Map....................... In Volume 2

Fawcett Twp. property map........................... After Page 10

Fawcett Twp. - Zinc S Copper in Top Soil............ In Volume 2

Fawcett Twp. - Zinc S Copper in Sub Soil............ In Volume 2

Fawcett Twp. - Lead in Top Soil S Sub Soil.......... In Volume 2

Fawcett Twp. - Geological Map....................... In Volume 2

Knight Twp. property map............................ After Page 14

Knight Twp. - Zinc S Copper in Top Soil............. In Volume 2

Knight Twp. - Zinc A Copper in Sub Soil............. In Volume 2

Knight Twp. - Lead in Top Soil S Sub Soil........... In Volume 2

Knight Twp. - Geological Map........................ In Volume 2

Geochemical Results................................. In Volume 2

Page 23: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page l

I. SUMMARY

Geophysical surveys conducted in 1971 over four claim groups in the Shining Tree area indicated anomalous electromagnetic conditions that were, in three groups, accompanied by magnetic anomalies. As the geology of the Shining Tree area in general and the claim groups, in particular, was not sufficiently well known it was decided to conduct geological mapping and soil geochemical surveys on each claim group to permit optimum siting of diamond drill holes.

The geological and geochemical surveys indicated targets suitable for drill testing on the Halliday, Burrows and Fawcett claim groups. The geology and geochemical response on the Knight group were considered not to warrant drilling.

Four holes totalling 1525 feet were drilled as follows:

Halliday - 2 holes each 400 ft.

Burrows - l hole 375 ft.

Fawcett - l hole 350 ft.

Although sulphide mineralization was encountered in all four holes, nothing of an economic tenor was intersected.

Page 24: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 2

II. INTRODUCTION

Following the definition by ground geophysical surveys of conductive horizons located within four claim groups in the Shining Tree area a request was made to the Ministry of Natural Resources under the Ontario Government's Mineral Exploration Assistance Program to enable geological and geochemical definition of diamond drill targets.

This request was approved and work commenced on the four properties in July 1972. Diamond drilling on three favourable properties began in November 1972 and was completed in January 1973.

The location, access, property descriptions and previous exploration has been summarized in the report "An Exploration Proposal for the Shining Tree Area Properties of Amax Potash Limited Townships of Halliday - Midlothian, Fawcett, Burrows and Knight (Larder Lake Mining Division)" by W.R. Ryall, Amax Potash Ltd., June 1972.

For convenience the area is shown in the location map (Fig 1) overleaf and the property maps are shown with the description of the work performed.

III. EXPLORATION PROGRAM 1972

(i) HALLIDAY - MIDLOTHIAN TOWNSHIPS

The claim group covered by the surveys is shown as Figure 2 and includes unpatented mining claims.

LSI2902-312907 incl., L312910-312911, L312913, L312915, L312917-312919 incl., L308795-308798 incl.

(a) SOIL GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Details of collection, preparation, analysis and results which are common to all claim groups sampled are given in Appendix I.

Over the Halliday - Midlothian claim group 420 samples were collected over 800 ft. lines. 800 ft. lines were employed due to the extreme length of the conductor.

Ecology and drainage

The VLF conductor axis follows the crest of a long East-West ridge from one end of the grid to the other. Mature birch and poplar

Page 25: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Kirkland Lake Area

DI..I

fil(.J Vl'M I*'. li* l |HnlHrti*.t l rninn '{'.".H, lflOMHt l______|j . j_______|

t i i ' t " i '

Cobalt-Gowganda Area

Areas eligible for exploration assistance

Figure 1. Location of claim groups in the Shining Tree Area.

Scale l in "a 20 mi.

Page 26: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

l)

> l ** s o

O

ro

S

o a o Q -o

X l CO o

to

Page 27: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 3

are thick along the top and sides of this ridge while small patches of cedar and spruce bog lie to the north and south. Spruce and balsam are well mixed with poplar on the lower slopes of the ridge.

The area near the centre of the group is typified as being well drained with no large bogs or marshes. Relief in some sections and more particularly to the east is quite rugged with high birch covered hills and ridges. There are two small lakes located on the grid, one on the south end of L28E and the other larger one at the south ends of L48E and L52E. There are no streams of any size on the grid but there are damp drainage channels between the ridges that are dense with alder growth.

Soils

The tops and sides of the main east-west ridge are covered with well developed podzol s while the lower slopes and flatter sections are overlain with gleysols and humified organic matter.

Podzol s are the predominant soil type encountered on the grid. Some exceptional sections were encountered with leached (AE) horizons developed to 12"-l6".

Geochemistry discussion

Both top and sub soil surveys have been contoured using different threshold levels to outline the areas of interest. The more significant or anomalous values lie within these selected contour levels and are shown on Figures 3, 4 and 5.

Threshold values used to establish the significant and background levels for the two surveys are as follows:

Zn Cu Pb _______ppm______

(A) Top Soil

Background 100 8 50 Significant 200 40 100

(B) Sub Soil

Background 30 20 15 Significant 60 30 30

Page 28: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 4

Anomalous values occur at the following stations:

Gr i d Location______Soil_______Hot HC104-HN03 extraction

Cu Ni Zn ppm

Pb Ag

T.S. L20W-2S S.S.

T.S. L12W-1N S.S.

T.S. S.S.

T.S. S.S.

T.S. S.S.

T.S. S.S.

L4W-2N

L4E-0

L28E-5N

L36E-0

gleysol

humus

podzol

gleysol

podzol

peat

4020

52

2832

6026

2026

8084

2816

44

2832

4434

2424

4034

410152

13812

430 106

540630

308236

24684

116128

100108

870

5214

3628

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Both top and sub soil surveys have succeeded in delimiting several similar features.

Top Soils

The most striking feature of the top soil survey is that the 200 ppm zinc contour outlines the conductor axis from one end of the grid to the other. Anomalous copper values tend to be within or flank this and other minor zinc features. Lead presents a more complex picture but shows good coincidence with the major zinc and copper trends.

There are two broad areas or zones outlined in the top soil that exhibit an overall higher concentration of metal values. Their locations are (1) L12E to L4E and (2) between L28E and L36E. In each instance the zones lie along the conductor axis and have highly anomalous metal values over widths of 200 ft. - 400 ft.

Zone #1 is a 500 ft. wide zinc anomaly with a strong copper and lead core. The more easterly #2 zone is a copper-lead feature with flanking zinc. There is a very strong magnetic anomaly associated with this zone along with a double E.M. conductor.

Page 29: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 5

Top Soils

The plotted sub soil values verify the presence of the two zones expressed in the top soil but in a more concise manner.

Zone number one is shown to be two parallel features striking east-west for 1600 ft. The two parts form very strong copper and zinc anomalies with a lead core in the northern segment.

Zone number two is a very broad zinc and copper feature with lead association. The anomaly is 800 ft. long and 500 ft. wide and forms a separate distinct anomalous zone.

In both instances the sub soil survey acted as a screen through which the minor features detected in the more sensitive top soil could be discriminated so that the major and more interesting trends could be defined.

Conclusion

The contoured top and sub soil values present similar pictures but of different intensities. They are both characterized by their coincidence to the VLF Radem conductor axis and the delimiting of two separate zones of anomalous metallic concentrations.

(b) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

The survey was conducted over a 400 ft. grid system previously established for geophysical surveys. Outcrop is abundant at the centre of the group which is located on a prominent ridge, but to the south and north swampy conditions, with no outcrop, prevail. Near the centre of the property overburden is sandy and generally less than 20 ft. thick.

Bedrock exposed on the property is assumed to be of Precambrian age following the excellent mapping of E.G. Bright, O.D.M. geologist, published as Geological Report 79 "Geology of Halliday and Midlothian Townships" 1970.

The oldest rocks appear to be Archean felsic metavolcanic units consisting of intercalated rhyolite or rhyodacite, rhyolite tuff, and possibly dacite. Intermediate metavolcanic units are apparently interbedded with the more felsic units as are seen on lines 4E and 24E near the base line (Figure 6),

Associated with the rhyolite tuff unit on line 60E are graphite-filled shears containing up to 5/K pyrite and pyrrhotite.

The volcanic formations strike approximately E-W and dip steeply to the South. Outcrop is not sufficient to delimit further

Page 30: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 6

structure. Shearing and faulting is recognized only on lin e 20W and 4E.

Intrusive into the felsic units occur several bodies of diorite and gabbro. The former appear to be generally concordant with the country rocks whilst the latter is markedly discordant as seen on line 80E.

Unconformably overlying the Archean formations occur several prominent outcrops of Huronian sandstones, quartzites and conglomerates. These outcrops in the South of the property and form prominent hills and ridges to the East.

(c) DIAMOND DRILLING

Two holes were drilled as follows

Number Location Di p Length

TX-91-72 Line 00, 2+OOS -450 400 ft.

TX-92-72 Line 44E, WON -450 400 ft.

Drill logs are shown overleaf together with assay results of characteristic core sections. Details of the drilling are summarized on the logs.

(ii) BURROWS TOWNSHIP

The claim group covered by the surveys is shown as Figure 7 and includes the following claims

L308831, LSI 2947, LSI 2949-50.

(a) GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Ecology and drainage

The area has been recently burned over and is covered with young poplar and jackpine. The bush is open with little underbrush and in some spots very sparse. With the exception of the margins of the two lakes the area of the grid is extremely dry with no creeks or bogs.

Page 31: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 7

Soils

The grid covers rolling sand hills and dunes with very little outcrop. Drainage is excellent and as a result podzols are well developed. Most all of the samples collected were sandy podzols save a few gleys near the shores of the lakes.

Geochemical Survey

Discussion

The contoured results of the top and sub soil surveys exhibit a general lack of correlation with each other and to the conductor axis (Figures 8, 9, 10). There are however, two zones that do have some significance in that they both are located in close proximity to the conductive axis and strike in the same direction as the conductor.

Some of the more anomalous values detected in these zones are:

Hot HC104-HN03 extraction

Grid Location

T. S. L4W-4N S.S.

T.S. LO-1S S.S.

T.S. L12NW-4SW S.S.

T.S. L8NW-4SW S.S.

T.S. L4NW-1SW S.S.

T.S. L4NW-3SW S.S.

Background values for both top and sub soil surveys are extremely low and are the lowest encountered on the four grids surveyed. As a result the thresholds for the anomalous or significant values are correspondingly of lesser amplitude than that of the other properties.

Soil

humus

podzol

podzol

podzol

podzol

podzol

Cu

204

2120

248

421

242

406

Ni

1614

2028

3252

3212

208

4012

Zn ppm

20410

20328

24060

87032

818

42048

Pb

724

6812

6016

1528

904

8828

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Page 32: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

CABOT TWP. C'

AMAX POTASH LTD.

Location Map

BURROWS TWP.

Scalei l" s 1/2 Mi.

Figure 7

Page 33: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 8

Zn Cu Pb_____ppm__^_

(A) Top Soil

Background 40 10 25 Significant 200 20 60

(B) Sub Soil

Background 20 4 10 Significant 30 10 15

Top Soil Survey

A strong, well defined, zinc, copper and lead zone parallels the conductor axis south of the baseline from lines 8 NW through to line 0. There is a discontinuous weaker zone that appears on line 4W and extends to line 12NW. The 40 ppm lead contour envelopes this zone which has an interesting Zn "eye" on station IS LO, the eye is coincident to the VEM conductor axis.

Sub Soil Survey

The lack of any great difference between "background" and "significant" values has made selection of contour intervals difficult and interpretation hazardous.

A zinc feature of twice background or better with good copper and some lead association duplicates the parallel zone "B" as shown in the top soil. Zone "A" is very weak in the sub soil and comes through as a two line copper feature on the conductor axis.

A persistent zone of copper, zinc and lead concentration runs along the north ends of all the lines near Little Marne Lake. As the area covered by the grid drains towards the lake this may be a reflection of accumulated metals on the low end of a drainage system.

Likewise a dry marsh covered with gleysols shows up on the north end of line 4NW as a zinc and copper feature within the top soils.

Conclusions

1. Both top and sub soil surveys have outlined two zones ("A" and "B") of anomalous trace metal concentrations that would appear to be associated with the conductor.

Page 34: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 9

2. The top soil survey and, more particularly, zinc in the top soil has provided a better guide than lead or copper. Overburden in this area is to be 10-70 ft. and most of this is freely drained sand. (The almost barren sub soils are attributed to be a result of the absence of any organic fraction that would tend to trap any metallic ions).

3. Although the geochemical association with the conductor is weak and erratic in sub soils it is stronger and delimits the conductor better in the top soils.

4. It is assumed that the anomalous zinc and lead in the top soils have a nearby source and that it's most likely location is the conductor previously defined by the VEM survey.

(b) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

The survey was conducted over 400 ft. lines previously established for geophysical surveys.

Outcrop is sparse on the claim group where thick Pleistocene outwash sands have formed conspicuous dunes.

The oldest formation exposed on the group is probably Archean greenstones of which andesite or dacite is the most prevalent. This formation appears to strike about 3200 and to dip steeply SW (Figure 11).

The andesite is generally a pale green-grey colour in outcrop and is well foliated. It appears massive with no pillows having been observed.

Apparently overlying the andesite-dacite occurs a more felsic group which has tentatively been identified as a rhyolite. This rock is typically of lighter colour than the andesite, commonly shows sericitic alteration and is fragmental in part. It seems likely that this formation is the one identified as a dacite fragmental in drill hole TX-93-72.

Intrusive into the andesite-dacite occur two short bodies of diabase that are observed in outcrop on line 8NW near the base line and near the shore of Little Marne Lake west of the No. 2 post of claim L 312949.

Also showing intrusive contacts to the andesite is the small syenite outcrop occurring at line 8E near the base line.

Page 35: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 10

No evidence was found in outcrop of the argillite intersected in drill hole TX-93-72. This unit is graphitic in part and is the cause of the electromagnetic conductor. The argillite formation presumably overlies the andesite-dacite group and is not present in outcrop due to its low resistance to physical forces.

(c) DIAMOND DRILLING (/06S

One hole was drilled as follows:

Number Location

TX-93-72 Line 2E, 1+90S

Dip -450

Length

375 ft.

The drill log is shown overleaf together with assay results of characteristic core sections. Details of the drilling are summarized on the logs.

(iii) FAWCETT TOWNSHIP

The group surveyed is shown in Figure 12. Claim numbers are as follows:

L 308816-17, L 308812-13.

(a) SOIL GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Drainage and ecology

The area covered by the grid varies in relief with many low rocky ridges and many small bogs and depressions scattered throughout. The major drainage pattern is to the north and east towards a large swamp and small lake.

The bush is well mixed over the grid with no large stands of any particular species. It is a mature mixture of birch, poplar, black spruce and alder.

Soils

Podzol s are well developed in the rougher, better drained ground while much gleysols and deep humic material are found between the ridges and in the bogs. The majority of samples analyzed were podzols. Overburden is estimated to be in the order of 10'-20' over most of the conductor, which outcrops on lines 4E and O on the base line.

Page 36: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

MocMURCHY TWP.

JL4M

FAWCETT TWP.

AMAX POTASH LTD.

Location Map

FAWCETT TWP.

Scale' l" si/2 Mi.

Figure 12

Page 37: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 11

Geochemical Survey

Discussion

The plotted zinc, copper and lead values show a strongly anomalous pattern coincident to the conductor axis in both the top and sub soil (Figures 13, 14, and 15).

Background and the more significant values detected in the survey have been determined as follows.

(A)

(B)

Lack of any great variation between background and significant levels in the subsoil makes selection of "anomalous" zoned sifficult but can be done with some confidence when a series of even slightly enriched samples form a pattern similar to that in the top soil. There are a few sample points with highly anomalous values in all three elements that have been duplicated in both the top and sub soil. The more interesting of these are tabulated below.

Hot HC104-HN03 extraction

Top Soil

Background Significant

Sub Soil

Background Significant

In

80 200

30 40

Cu ppm

25 40

12 20

Pb

65 100

12 20

T. S.S.S.

T. S.S.S.

T. S.S.S.

T. S.S.S.

T. S.S.S.

T. S.S.S.

Grid Location

L12E-3N

L4E-3N

LO-1S

LO-2S

L4W-1N

L8W-2N

Soil

Podzol

Gleysol

Gley sol

Podzol

Gleysol

Podzol

Cu

406

4640

800328

23248

76228

404

Ni

4016

3628

4644

6820

2444

4420

Znppm

21226

200188

3232

59032

328540

30426

Pb

12012

44148

1616

10812

168

12412

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

1.5.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Page 38: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 12

The surveys have detected what would first appear to be one continuous zone of enrichment following the conductor axis with a wider concentration on line O and 4W.

However, closer examination of the geochemical results with the aid of the magnetic survey separates the one zone into two components.

The main zone outlines the conductor to the north of the base line from L12E through to 8W. This zone is a prominent copper, zinc and lead feature strongest around line 0.

A much smaller though very strong anomaly exists south of the base line and runs from L4W to LO at 2+OOS. This is a very interesting feature in that it is coincident to an identically short strong magnetic expression.

Top Soil Survey

The 200 ppm zinc contour and 40 ppm copper contour outline the conductor axis. A strong lead feature forms a "core" to this main zone. There is metal enrichment north on line 8E, but this is attributed to concentration due to local drainage. A small though strong copper and zinc anomaly exists south on LO, the 100 ppm lead contour defines this feature as a separate entity from the main zone.

Sub Soil Survey

The geochemical expression in the "B" horizon is more subtle but recognizable and as in the top soil delimits the conductor axis.

The smaller southerly zone appears as a broad copper anomaly with a strongly anomalous nucleus on line O - IS. Zinc serves to define the main zone while copper and lead have an intermittent weaker expression within the zinc contour.

Conclusions

The geochemical sampling has delimited the conductor axis and pointed to two areas of relatively higher enrichment. The main zone has its highest values located on L4W-1N while the smaller feature is confined to LO and L4W at 2S with the heart on LO-2S. Both of the zones detected have accompanying geophysical expression.

Page 39: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 13

(b) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Outcrop in this group is virtually restricted to claims L 308812 and L 308817, elsewhere light, bouldery overburden prevails with numerous small swampy patches occupying depressed areas {Figure 16).

The geology underlying this claim group is complex with the metavolcanic suite having suffered metamorphism to the albite-epidote- amphibolite facies and is strongly sheared and intruded by at least two pulses of basic rocks.

The stratigraphy of the units has not been able to be determined and to do this would require survey of a much larger outcrop area.

Metavolcanic units present in outcrop include rhyolite, rhyolite breccia and andesite. The rhyolitic units are generally grey coloured in outcrop and range from massive to finely foliated in tuffaceous sections. Strong shearing, in places obliterating the foliation, is very common and is associated with development of heavy sericitization and lighter chloritization.

Sericite schists mapped in the south quarter of claim L 308812 may represent more intensely sheared felsic volcanic units.

Andesitic volcanics occur north of the felsic units and may underlie them. The andesites are massive, dark green-black in colour and show abundant development of chlorite. Shearing is not as well developed in the andesitic units as in the felsic units, located further south. Chlorite schists mapped near the south boundary of the property may represent, in part, sheared equivalents of the andesitic suite.

A generally East-West trending gabbroic intrusive occurs at the contact of the felsic formation and the schists. This intrusive appears to be about 200-300 ft. in outcrop width and bifurcates near the east of claim L 308812 enclosing rhyolitic and schistose country rocks. The gabbro appears closely similar to that intersected in drill hole TX-94-72.

There is no evidence in outcrop of the argillite units encountered in the drilling. These units are graphitic in part and apparently are the cause of the conductivity indicated by the electromagnetic survey.

Page 40: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 14

(c) DIAMOND DRILLING Uo&S

One hole was drilled:

Number Location

TX-94-72 Line 00, 0+20S

The drill log is shown overleaf.

Dip -450

Length

350 ft,

(lv) KNIGHT TOWNSHIP

Claims covered by the geological and geochemical survey are numbered L 316528-31 incl. and are shown on Figure 17,

(a) GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

A total of 356 soil samples were collected from 100 ft. stations on a 400 ft. grid that covers the VEM conductive axis defined by previous survey.

Ecology and drainage

The property is extremely rugged with high rock cliffs and ledges that form local land marks. A steep scarp forms the shoreline of Pigeon Lake and continues to rise until approximately 1500 ft. laterally from the lake shore when it slopes less steeply to the east. This ridge divides the property into two main drainage systems, one into Pigeon Lake and the other into a series of bogs and creeks to the northeast. There are many minor hills and ridges that locally disrupt the major drainage pattern.

Thick stands of birch and poplar cover the flatter hill tops but are well mixed with spruce and balsam in the lower areas, Spruce becomes more common to the northeast and forms a large spruce and labrador tea bog in the northeast quarter of the grid. Large white pines cover the dryer tops of the exposed rock hills.

Soils

Freely drained areas on the sides of the many hills have formed deep podzol s while the dips and ravines are filled with gleysols. The large spruce bog in the northeast has a depth of peat development that prevented penetration with the auger available.

Page 41: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

f

\

N

Q.

h-

QL

N

KNIGHT TWP.

TYRRELL TWP.J

AMAX POTASH LTD.

Locotion Mop

KNIGHT TWP.

Scole- l" - 1/2 Mi.

Figure 17

Page 42: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 15

Geochemical Survey

Discussion

The results of the top and sub soil surveys present a complex picture with no easily definable trends (Figures 18, 19 and 20). There is a loose east-trending-zinc feature in the sub soil while the 80 ppm lead contour in the top soil roughly approximates the location of the conductor axis. Significant and background values for the two surveys have been determined as follows.

Zn Cu Pb______ppm

(A) Top Soil

Background 100 25 45 Significant 200 40 100

(B) Sub Soil

Background 22 20 10 Significant 40 40 20

As the conductor lies on, or close to, the crest of a ridge, the complex drainage patterns coupled with the large hills have tended to disrupt any clear picutre of metal enrichment in the vicinity of the conductor. There are many isolated highly anomalous sample points the majority of which are concentrated on lines 2N and 6N near the base line.

These anomalous locations are situated on the down-hill slopes of a ridge underlain by the conductor, these high values therefore are attributed to metal!ics originating from the conductor with their location displaced by drainage.

The more anomalous values were recorded at the following stations.

Hot HC104-HN03 extraction

Grid Location Soil Cu Ni Ag Zn Pb________ppm^_______

T.S. L2S-2E podzol 32 32 .5 400 112 S.S. 6 20 .5 24 12

T.S. L2N-3E podzol 40 44 .5 820 96S.S. 4 16 .5 40 10

T. S. L2N-2W podzol 36 36 .5 352 104S.S. 4 20 .5 28 8

Page 43: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 16

Hot HC104-HN03 extraction

Grid Location Soil Cu Ni Ag Zn Pb________ppm______

T. S. L6N-2W humus 52 40 .5 384 132 S.S. M.S. - outcrop

T.S. LION-IE podzol 36 40 .5 224 176 S.S. 6 20 .5 20 12

Top Soil Survey

The only obvious feature outlined in this survey is the concentration of anomalous zinc and lead values on lines 2N and 6N on either side of the base line with the more intense being the one to the west. A series of sporadic high zinc values enclosed by an 80 ppm lead contour extends from the southeast towards the intense area on L2N. There is good correlation between the conductor axis and lead values from lines 2N to 6N.

Sub Soil Survey

Once again the lack of any appreciable spread between the assumed significant and background levels of enrichment plus the drainage problem has made interpretation tenuous. There is however, an identifiable zinc feature running at right angles to the lines that starts at L14S and terminates on line 6N. Along with this zone occur higher values along line 2N such as that seen in the top soil.

A weak copper feature runs from L6S at 13E to LION at 6E, it is located at the bottom of a steep hill and bog throughout its entirety and is attributed to down hill drainage and enrichment of the organics at their confluence.

Conclusions

It would be tenuous to attribute the source of the geochemical features present on the property to the outlined conductor with their scattered and non-definitive nature due to complex drainage patterns.

The direct correlation of some of the anomalous geochemical zones with the well defined magnetic features which are non-related to the conductor, places some of the magnetics in a position where they could be considered a possible source of the geochemical expressions. An example of this would be the coincidence of a lead feature to the magnetics on lines ION and 2S.

Page 44: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 17

(b) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

The geological survey was conducted over 400 ft. lines on a grid used for previous geophysical surveys.

A complex of Archean metavolcanic units ranging in composition from basalt to dacite have been intruded by gabbroic and peridotitic masses (Figure 21). Unconformably overlying these units is a sequence of Huronian sediments that form the westerly boundary of the extensive tract of Huronian sediments that outcrop from Gowganda, in the south, through to Montrose Township, in the north.

The metavolcanic units extend in N-S bands on the W of the property particularly in claim L 316528. Outcrop is not sufficient to determine structure with confidence but it appears the basalt-andesite suite may be the oldest rocks exposed.

The oldest intrusive rocks present in the area appears to be the peridotite which occupies all of claim L 316530 and most of claims L 316529 and L 316531. This intrusive is differentiated in part, at least, with a hornblende-rich phase being observed near the East boundary of claim L 316530.

A N-S trending elliptical-shaped body of gabbro outcrops in the centre of the claim group and appears to be intrusive into other Archean units. The gabbro is dark grey in colour, massive, poorly jointed and is composed of interlocking pyroxene crystals showing only minor interstitial feldspar. The rock is moderately altered with ragged amphibole and chlorite surrounding pyrozene crystals. The rock is moderately magnetic.

Overlying the Archean formations is a thick sequence of Huronian sediments consisting of quartzites, arkose, and conglomerate. These rocks have been described in much detail in many ODM Reports and are generally held to have no base metal potential. Only a cursory examination of these rocks was made in the field.

(c) DIAMOND DRILLING

The electromagnetic conductor was seen from the geological survey to transect several rock types ranging from peridotite to gabbro to felsic metavolcanic. This coupled with a weak, poorly defined soil geochemical signature indicated the conductor to have a low priority for drill evaluation. Consequently, no drilling was attempted on this property under the present Exploration Assistance Agreement.

Page 45: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 18

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In the Halliday-Midlothian, Burrows and Fawcett Township claim groups geological and soil geochemical surveys enhanced the likelihood of conductive horizons, outlined by prior geophysical surveys, having economic tenor. Targets were tested by diamond drilling and, although the conductors were found to be due to graphitic argillite units, sulphides were encountered in each hole. Unfortunately, assaying these sections proved them to be of no economic significance.

The claims in Knight Township were covered by geological and geochemical surveys but the results did not lend encouragement to drill testing the conductor outlined by previous surveys.

Limited Timmins^Ontario

Page 46: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Page 19

V. APPENDIX I SOIL GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS

(i) Sampling

Soil samples were collected at 100 ft. stations on 400 ft. lines over the Burrows, Fawcett and Knight Township properties. 800 ft. lines were employed for sampling the Halliday-Midlothian Township property due to the extreme length of the conductor. On this property closer spaces sampling was planned if results of preliminary diamond drilling warranted.

Field collection and sample preparation was supervised by Randy Roussain, Amax Potash Limited, Timmins.

Two samples were collected at each station -No. l in the sub soil represented the B horizon and No. 2 in the top soil represented the A horizon. In low lying, swampy areas considerable accummulations of humified organic matter were encountered and in such areas two samples were collected: No. l from immediately below the forest litter and No. 2 from a depth of 12-18 inches. In very wet areas where the soil was not sufficiently cohesive, only one sample was obtained.

A total of 1122 samples were collected as follows:

Halliday-Midlothian Twp. : 434Burrows Twp. : 172Fawcett Twp. : 160Knight Twp. : 356

(11)Samples were placed in wet-strength Kraft envelopes, shipped

to the Timmins office and dried. Further preparation and analysis was performed at the Amax Laboratory, 2225 Springer Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia.

(i i i) Analytical Procedure

-80# fractions were analyzed for Cu, Ni, Pb, Ag, and Zn by Atomic Absorption techniques following digestion in hot HC104-HN03. Sample numbers, field coordinates and analytical results are included in Volume 2 as Figure 22.

Page 47: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

-

Grid

Grid #1

*

.

i

n

i

ji

l

l

i

t

t

l

Co-ordinate

L20W 8+OOS

7+OOS

6+OOS

i

1 5+OOS

4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

2+OON

3+OON

4+OON

5+OON

6+OON

Sample Type

Soil

1

-.

*

!

1

'

' 7+OON

! :

!?

8+OON

L12W 8+OONi

Horizon

S.S. 40"

T. S. 4"

S.S. TfVS.o/c

T. S. 6"

S.S. 14"

T. S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T. S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. y, ' 2"

S.S.' 10"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 30"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. ft.S. o/c

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

Sample No.

805

806

807

808

809

810

811

812

813

814

815

816

817

.. 818

819

820

821

822

823

1 824

825

826

827

828

829

830

831

832

833

834

835

836

a:7

T.S. 2" j 838i

S.S. 14" j - 839

T.S. 2" 840

1 r

Page 48: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

,

|

Grid

Grid #1

'

1sr

i

Co-ordinate

L12W 7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON

3+OON

2+OON

, 1+OON

0+00

1+OOS'

2+OOS

3+OOS

; 4+OOS

; 5+OOS

.

6+OOS

7+OOS

8+OOS

L4W 8+OOS

Sample Type

Soil

u-

i

7+OOSi

\

Horizon

S.S. 18"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. . 5"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. lf|.S o/c

T.S. 2"

s.s. r\.s. o/0T.S. 3"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 18"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 18"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 15"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

' Sample No.

841

842

843

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851

852

853

854

855

856

857

858

859

860'

861

862

863

S69 ?*V

865

866

867

868

869

870

871

872

873

874

875

876

Page 49: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

'

-

i

Grid

Grid #1

Anomaly #1

.

Co-ordinate

L4W 6+OOS

5+OOS

4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

2+OON

3+OON

, 4+OONi . i

5+OON

i

6+OON

7+OON

i 8+OON

L4E 8+OON

: 7+OON

6+OON

Sample Type

Soil

.i

Horizon

S.S. 12"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 2"

T.S. 1"

s.s. y). s o/cT.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 22"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 13"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 3"

S.S.' 16"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 24"

T.S. 2"

Sample No.

877

878

879

880

881

882

883

884

885

886

887

888

889

890

891

892

893

894

895

896

897

898

1 899

900

901

902

903

904

905

906

907

908

909

910

911

912

Page 50: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

.

Grid

Anomaly #1

'

Co-ordinate

L4E . 5+OON

4+OON

3+OON .

2+OON

1+OON

0+00

1+005

2+OOS

3+0031

4+OOS

5+OOS

6+OOS

7+OOS

8+OOS

L12E 8+OOS

7+OOS

6+OOS

i

5+OOS

i

Sample Type

Soil

i

!

Horizon

S.S. 14"

T. S. 3"

S.S. 20"

T. S. 3"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 22"

T.S. 14"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 20"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 14"

T.S.' 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 1"

.S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 24"

T.S. 15"

S.S. . 36"

T.S. 20"

.S.S. 48"

T.S. 6"

Sample No.

913

914

915

916

917

91-8

919

920

921

922

923

924

925

926

927

928

929

930

, 931

932

933

934

935

936

937

938

939

. 940

941

942

943

944

945

946

947

948 .

Page 51: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

.

-

i

Grid

Anomaly #1

i

i

i

i

.

i

i

Co-ordinate

LI 2E 4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OOS

2+OON

3+OON

4+OON

5+OON

.

6+OON

7+OON

8+OON

L20E 8+OON

7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON

Sample Type

Soil

i

Horizon

S.S. 38"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 42"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 30"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 40" jT.S. 8"

S.S. 42"

T.S. . 12'

S.S. 36'

T.S. 8'

S.S. 40'

T.S? 12'

S.S. 46'

T.S. 16'

S.S. 36'

. T.S. 8'

S.S. 40'

T.S. 12'

S.S. 36'

T.S. 12'

S.S. 16'

T.S. 10'

S.S. 28'

T.S. 8'

S.S. 12'

T.S. 3'

S.S. 8'

T.S. T

Sample No.

949

950

951

952

953

954

955

956

957

958

959

960

961

962

963

964

965

966

967

968

969

970

971

972

973

974

975

976

977

978

979

980

981

982

983

984

Page 52: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

Grid

Anomaly #1

*

Co-ordinate

L20E 3+OON

2+OON

. 1+OON

0+00

: i+oos

2+OOS

i

| 3+OOS

: 4+OOS

5+OOS

6+OOS

i

7+OOS

8+OOS

Sample Type

Soil j

-

-

Horizon

S.S. 8"

T. S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T. S. 2"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. , 1"

s.s. lo"T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.'S. ^-5"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 28"

T.S. 8"

Sample No.'985

986

987

988

989

990

991

992

993994'

995

996

997

998

999

1000

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

/;

Page 53: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHBM SAMPLE INDEX

Township j Grid

Halliday. .

1 ,

_

'

1

AN: #1

1

1

j

|It

f! \ ' i

:

Co-ordinate

L28E 2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

2+OON

3+OON

i

4+OON

5+OON

6+OON

7+OON

. i 8+OON

L36E 8+OON

7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON

3+OON

Sample Type

Soil

i

'

;

:

: ' *

V i

! : ! : ' '

i . ' .ali

2+OON \•ii

' ' ' l

Horizon

S.S. 32"

T.S. - 12"

S.S. 30"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 42"

T.S. 12"

S.S. 10"

T.S; 2"S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S.' 2"

S.S. fl.S o/c

T.S.' 8"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12" .

T.S. 2"

S.S. 5"

T.sL 2"

S.S. 8"

Sample No.

1009

1010

ion1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1019

1020 -

1021

1 022

1023

1024

1025

1026

1027

1 028

' .1029

1030

1031

1032

1033

1034

1035

1036

.1037

1038

1039

1040

1041

T.S. ] 2 " j 1042

S.S. ; 16" 1043

T.S. .3" l 1044

Page 54: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

.

Grid

AN: #1

l ; . Co-ordinate \ Sample Type

L36E 1+OON

Q+00

1+OOS

2+OOS

3+OOS

4+OOS

L44E 6+OOS

5+OOS

4+OOS

1

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

'* 'i 1

. 2+OON

3+OON'

if\

j' i

l

4+OON

Soil

:

' i -

1 ' i

V

^

i

5+OON |

4

Horizon

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S.- 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. ' 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S.. 2"

S.S. 32"

T.S. 12"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

Sample No.

1045

1046

1 047

1048

1049

1050

1051

1052

1053

1054

1055

1056

1057

1058

1059

1060

' 1061

1062

1063

1064

1065

1066

1067

1068

1069

1070

1071

1072

1073

1074

1075\

T.S. 4"

S.S. 8"

T.S. rS.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

1076

1077

1078

; 1079

1080

.

Page 55: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GBOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

t

Township j Grid

Halliday

'. '

-

.

AN: #1

'

-

'

.il

i

- 'i

-

.1

Co-ordinnte f Sample Type

L44E 6+OON

7+OON

8+OON

9+OON

L52E 8+OON

7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON' \

3+OON

2+OON

. 1+OON

0+00

1+OOS

i

1 2+OOS

Soil }

.

i

V

: ' *

i " - ' 1 '. ,'. :: 3+OOS' ,

4+OOS

5+OOS

1

i :i

l '

Horizon

s.s. Yl-S.o/cT.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"'

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S, 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. ' 10"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 5"

T.S. 2"

Sample No.

1081

1082

, 1083

1084

1085

1086

1087

1088

1089

1090

1091

1092

- 1093

1094

1095

1096

1097

1098

1099

1100

1101

1102

1103

1104

.1 1 05

1106

1107

1108

, 1109

1110.S.S. 12" j 1111

T.S. 1" j 1112

S.S. 12"

T.S. . r1

S.S. 12"

1113

1114.1115

T.S. 4" j 1116

Page 56: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township | Grid

Halliday

.

.

i

AN: #1 ;

- ' l

j

j

( '1

1AP•j1

f

l

lll

'

1

Co-ordinate

L60E 5+OOS

Sample Type

Soil

4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

2+OON

3+OON

4+OON

5+OON

6+OON i

7+OON

8+OON

,.

.

i

V

9+OON * -*

:" ! :1 'L68E 10+OOtj

19+OON

1

8+OON

!

|

1

Horizon

s.s. \vs.o7cT.S. 4"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1 2"

S.S. .8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. -1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T. S.. 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 2"

S.S. .22"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

s.s. Y\-S. 0/ 0T.S. 8"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. y^5 o/c

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10" j

T.S. 2"

S.S. VV5.0/C

T.S. 2"

•Sample No.w

1117

1118

1119

1120

1121

1122

1123

1124

1125

1126

1 1 27

1128

1129

1130

1131

1132

1133

1134

1135

1136

1137

1138

1139

1140

1141

1142

1143

1144

1145

1146

1147

- 1148

1149

1150

1151

1152'

Page 57: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday*

•'

i,

l.

.'

Grid

AN: #1

•j

i

ij.

j

'

^

'

'

i

M

Co-ordinate

L68E 7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON

3+OON

2+OON

. .1+OON

-

0+00

1+OOS

2+OOS

3+OOS

4+OOS

5+OOS

6+OOS

L76E 4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

1+OOS

Sample Type

Soil

.

:

i

| . . "" '.

A

l ;

;

Horizon

S.S., 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S, 6"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. i 3"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 6"

T.S V . 1" "

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T. S; 2"

S.S. 20"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 24"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 4"

S ^ Vi cr n/r * ' Fi * j '

T.S. 2"- '

S.S. 24"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 26"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"'

T.S. 3"

Sample No.

. 1153

1154

1155

1156

11 57

1158

1159

11 60

1161

1162

1163

1164

1165

1 1 66

1167

1 1 68

.1169

1170

1171

1172

1173

1174

1175

1176

1177

1178

1179

1180

1181

1182

1183

1184

1185

1186

1187

1188

Page 58: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GBOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township f Grid | Co-ordinate | Sample Type

Halliday AN: #1•-

'

-

a

'

'.

.

L76E 0+00

1+OON

2+OON

i

3+OON

i

4+OON

5+OON

6+OON

7+OON

8+OON

9+OON

10+OON

11+OON

1 2+OON

1 3+OON

a

\ ' '

| '

j

i !i

i i

L84E 1 6+OON

1 5+OON

1 4+OON

1 3+OON

Soil

i

i

,.

i -

•-

V

i ..

i

5

j ; ' .-

•; ' j ' ' : ' - -

Horizon

S C \A f* A /O

* ^ * |\ O* ® ' ^

•T.S. . 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 3"

T.S, 2"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 24"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 3"

S.S., 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S.' 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S.' 13"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 11"

T. Si 2"• iS.S. 22"

T.S. 3"

.

Sample No.

1189

1190

1191

( ' 1192

1193

1194

1195

1196

1197

1198

1199

1200

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1214

1215

1216

.1217

1218

1219

i 1220

1221

! 1222

S.S. : 12" j 1223

T.S. 3" 1224

i

Page 59: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Halliday

fi -Grid

AN: #1

Co-ordinate

L84E 12+OON

11+OON

10+OON

9+OON

8+OON

. 7+OON

6+OON

Samplei Type

Soil

1

:

Horizon

S.S. 8"

T.S. . 2"

s.s. YVS. 0/0T.S. 8"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

s.s. y\.5.o7cT.S. 6"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 5"

T.S. ^ 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 5"

Sample No.

1225

1226

1227

1228

1229

1 230

1231

1232

1233

1234

1235

1236

1237

1238

Page 60: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEiM SAMPLE INDEX

jTowiisln j)

Knight

.

Gv:i.J

AN: i!8

.

'

tV

i

i

i

Co-ordi.nal,o

L22S 15+OOE

14+OOE

13+OOE

L18S 7+OOE

8+OOE

9+OOE

10+OOE

11+OOE

12+OOE

13+OOE

14+OOE

1 5+OOE

16+OOE

L14S 16+OOE

-' 15+OOE

14+OOE

13+OOE

Mnmplo -Typo

Soil

i

' !

i

: r

i

i ,

V

flf

-

v. :

1 2+OOE i

l' :

Horixon

S.S. 14"

T.S. 4"

S.S. ' 3"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 1"

S.S. y\.s.o7cT, S. 2"

S.S. y^ ^ 0/C

T.S,,^ - 1"'

S.S. 7"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 11"

T.S. l"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. ' 11"

T.S. .2"

. S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"i

SciifijiJo Mo.

1287

1288

, 1289

1290

1291

1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1297

1298

1299V

1300

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1312

1313

1314

, 1315

1316

S.S. , 9" j 1317

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. . 1"

1318

j' 1319

. 1320

S.S. . 9" | 1321

T.S. 3" j 1322

. i '

Page 61: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township | Grid | Co-ordinate

Knight

,

.

'

i

AN: 18 :

t

i

.

L14S 1 1+OOE

10+OOE

9+OOE

8+OOE

7+OOE

6+OOE

5+OOE

4+OOE

LI OS 1+OOW

0+00

1+OOE

2+OOE

3+OOE

4+OOE

5+OOE

6+OOE

7+OOE

8+OOE

i

1

Sample -Type

Soil i

. i

-

-.: '

;' ' j, 1

v :

*

(

j' . : -

Horizon

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 13"

T.S.' 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 6"

T.S, '1"

S;S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. YVS/o/c

T.S. 1"

s.s. y\.s o/cT.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 18"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

Sample No.

1323

1324

1325

1326

1327

1328

1329

1330

1331

1332

1333

1334

1335

1336

1337

' 1338

1339

1340

1341

1342

1343

1344

1345

1346

1347

1 348

1349

1350 ..

1351

1352

1353

1354

1355

13561

1357

T.S. 2" j. 1358

J ;- .' ' -

Page 62: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

f Township | Grid

Knight j AN: #18; -. - ' - - |

1

1

1'

' . j

iik t i

j

Co-ordinate

LI OS 9+OOE

10+OOE

11+OOE

12+OOE

13+OOE

14+OOE

15+OOE-

L6S 4+OOW

3+OOW

2+OOW

1+OOW

0+00

1+OOE

2+OOE

3+OOE

4+OOE

Sample Type

SOU l

.i i

;

:

-

-' '

!

V

l'' ' '

5+OOEJ :

6+OOE

1 : ; ; .

Horizon

S.S.' 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 3"

S.*, 12"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 10"

T.S. ; 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. fts.o/c

T.S. 5"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 4" .

S.S. 6"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 3"

S.S. IT"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. ' .4"

S.S. 9".

T.S. 4"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 13"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

Sample No.

1359

1360

1361

1362

1363

1364

1365

1366

1367

1368

1369

1370

1371

1372

1373

1374

1375

1376

1377

1378

1379

1380

1381

1382

1383

1384

1385

1386

1387

1388

1389

1390

1391

1392

1393

1394

Page 63: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township j

Knight'

,

'ii

,

1

Grid

AN: #18

t

' ;

i1

11 - 1

j

1

.' 'ii

l

11

.;

i

Co-ordinatej

L6S 7+OOE

8+OOE

i 9+OOE

1 0+OOE

n+ooE

12+OOE

j13+OOE

14+OOE

15+OOE

L14N 1 0+OOE

9+OOE

8+OOE

7+OOE

6+OOE

5+OOE

4+OOE

3+OOE

2+OOE

I

Sample Type

Soil

i .

t '' -

: "

\ '

\

j

V

i :'

j :

1 ' :

Horizon

S.S. 26"

T.S. 12"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S.' 10"

T.S. 2"

SSS. V 15"

T.S. 2"

S.S.' 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 13"

T.S. 3".

S.S. 30"

T.S. \ 1 0"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S ^ \\ C n/r * o * r i *^ '

T.S. 3"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 5"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1"

Sample No.

1395

1396

1397 .

1398

1399

1400

1401

1402

1403

1404

1405

1406

' 1407

' 1408

1409

1410

'1411

1412

1413

1414

1415

1416

1417

1418

. 1419

1420

1421

1422

1423

1424

14251

1426

1427, ,

1428

1429

1430

Page 64: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township j

Knight

- -;*

.

.

Grid

AN: #18

*

j

'

i

Co-ordinate j

L14N 0+00

l

: 1+OOWi

: 2+OOW

3+OOW

: 4+OOW

5+OOW

6+OOW

: 7+OOW

i j

8+OOW

L2S 15+OOE

14+OOE

13+OOE

12+OOE

11+OOE

lOitOOE

9+OOE

8+OOE

j7+OOE

\ '

m

Sample Type

Soil ;'

: '

:

' :

j .' v

*

:

.

V ' - '

'i ' ;*

1

l

Horizon

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S. S . 1 8"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 18"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 18"

T.S. - 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S.' 8".

T.S. 1"

S.S. y\ c 0/C

T.S. 1"

S.S. 32"

T.S. 10"

S. S J 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 11"

T.S. -l"

S.S. ; 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 22"1 .

T.S. T

Sample No.

.1433

1434

1435

1436

1437

1438

1439

1440

1441

1442

1443 ;

1444

1445

1446

1447

1448

1449

' 1450

1451

1452

1453

1454

, 1455

1456

1457

1458

1459

1460

1461

1462

T463

1464.

1465

1466

1467

! 1468

Page 65: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Knight

- -

.

1

- ( \

..

r

i

i .

Knight i

1

Grid

AN: #18

, •,

\

:

9

'

AN: #18 -

I

i

Co-ordinate

L2S 6+OOE

|

5+OOE

4+OOE

3+OOE

2+OOE

1+OOE

0+00

1 1+OOW

'

2+OOW

] 3+OOW

L2S 4+OOW

5+OOW

6+OOW

7+OOW

•t*

LION 10+OOE

;

9+OOE1

8+OOE

j 7+OOE'i

l

Sample Type

Soil ;-

_

-

;

Soil

V-

' ' -' ,-

Soil

.

3

Horizon

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1-1/2'

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 19"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 26"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 40"H

T.S. 10"

Sample No.

1469

1470

1471

1472

1473

1474

1475

1476

1477

1478

1479

1480

1481 : ' 1482

1483

1484

1485

1486

1487

1488

1489

1490

1491

1492

1493

1494

1495

1496

1497

. . ,. 1498 ,

1499

1500

. 1501

1502

l 1503

1504

Page 66: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township j Grid jj Co-ordinate j Sample Type

Knight

.

'

AN: #18

' -

'

! .

*t

.

'

-

'

i

i

LI ON 6+OOE

5+OOE

4+OOE

3+OOE

2+OOE

1+OOE

0+OOE

1+OOW

2+OOW

3+OOW

4+OOW

5+OOW

,

6+OOW

i 7+OOW

: 8+oow

9+OOW

L2N ! 11+OOW

soil i

, .

.

[ . ' ,.

'

' ' \ -

: ' *- .-

\

10+OOW j

i

i !

Horizon

S.S. 40"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"'

T.S. 2"

S.S. 26"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 13"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 34"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 10"

T.S. ' 2"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. . 1"

S.S. , 4"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. . 1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

Sample No.

1505

. 1506

1507

1 508

1 509

1510

1511

1 51 2

1513

. 1514 '

1515

1516

1517 '

1518

1519

1520

1521

1522

.1523

1524.

: 1525

1526

1527

1 528

1529

, 1530

1531

. 1532

1533

1534

1535

1536

1537

1538

1539

I54d

Page 67: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Knight

1

Grid

AN: #18

ktii

i

i Co-ordinate

L2N 9+OOW

8+OOW

7+OOW

6+OOW

5+OOW

4+OOW

3+OOW

2+OOW

1+OOW

0+00

1+OOE

2+OOE

3+OOE

4+OOE

5+OOE

6+OOE

7+OOE

1

8+OOE

1

Sample Type

Soil i

i

i '

1

i

-

i -

i . : t "

1 ' i

i

j

i. - - .

\

l ' '':-

: - . '

Horizon

S.S.' 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 13"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S,, , , 1"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S. S f 7 "

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. , 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. T

S.S. 11"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. , ' 1"

S.S. 10"

f- q "P"1 t O * c.

S.S. 13"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 40"

T.S, 8"

S.S. 48"

T.S. 10"

Sample No.

1541

1542

1543

1544

1545

1546

1547

1548

1549

1550

.1551

1552

1553

1554

1555

1556

1557

1558

1559

1560

1561

1562

1563

1564

1565

1 566

1567

1568

1569

1570

1571

1572

1573

1574

1575

1576

i "'," . .

Page 68: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

' 1 Township f Grid j Co-ordinate

Knight

.

,

i i

-

AN: #18

i

,.

.- - ;

'

i

L2N 9+OOE

10+OOE

11+OOE

12+OOE

13+OOE

14+OOE

15+OOE

L6N 15+OOE

14+OOE

13+OOE

12+OOE

11+OOE

10+OOE

9+OOE

8+OOE

7+OOE

6+OOE

Sample Type

Soil

! -;:' :

f.

\ ' "

j ' . ' .

!

i

1

.

V .

:

1 ' 'a 5+OOE j

1 ; '' . .-J . l ;

Horizon

S.S. 48"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 28"

T.S.) 10"

S.S. 48"

T.S. TO"

S.S. 136"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 33"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 40"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 48"

T.S, 10"

S.S. 40"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 28"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 6"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 34"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 40"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 26"

T.S; 10"S.S. 18"

Sample No.

1,577

1 578

1579

1580

1581

1582

1583

1584

1585

1586

1587

1588

1589

1590

1591

1592

1593

1594

1595

1596

1597

1598

1599

1600

1601

1602

1 603

1604

1605.

1606

1607

1608

1609

1610

1611. -

T.S. .3" j 1612

''- . i : : ij -' . a ,

Page 69: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Knight

'

C

-.'

- -

p

-

j

Grid

AN: #18

,

i

1

- -

f

'

-

Co-ordinate i

L6N 4+OOE

3+OOE

2+OOE'

1+OOE

0+00

1+OOW

2+OOW

3+OOW

4+OOW

5+OOW

6+OOW

7+OOW'

8+OOW

9+OOW

^ . 10+OOk

f

1

.

Sample :Type1

Soil

1 ' l

1

' ' . ;

t

. '

l . .;-'.'

i ; .

i

. . | . .

!

If" ,

:i

| . . . '

.

Horizon

S.S. 16"

T.S. ' 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 15"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 1"

S.S. yrc o/c

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.sl 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. ; 18"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 22"

T.S. 10"

S.S. Y\^ 0/0

T.S.' 8".

S.S. 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 12"

T.S. '3"

Sample No.

1613

1614

1615

1616

. 1617

1618

1619

1620

1621

1622

' 1623

1624

1625

1626

1627

1628

1629

1630

1631

1632

1633

' 1634

1635

1636

1637

1638

1639

1640

1641

1642

1

'

.

Page 70: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

i Township

Burrows '

t

-

.

Grid

Bu #2 Gp. 1

t

\

' l\\

'

:

i. ,

Co-ordinate . j

L4E 6+OON

i

5+OON

: 4+OON

3+OON

2+OON

i 1+OON

l 0+00. t

1+OOS

;

: 2+OOS

: 3+OOS

4+OOS

5+OOS

6+OOS

L4W 6+OOS

5+OOS

4+OOS

3+OOS

2+OOS

i

Sample : Type

Soil

l

i ' '

' ,. -.

: '

i *

i i , ' i.* i

i . i*

1

1 . ;

Horizon

S.S. 14"

T. S. 1"

S.S. . 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 5"

T.S. T1

S.S. 9"

T.S.' 2"

S.S. 6"

T.S. rS.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. ' 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S.' 19"

T.S. 4"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 15"

T.S. 1/2"

S.SJ 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. :19"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 1/2"

Sanple No.

.1651

1652

1653

1654

1655

1656

1657

1 658

1659

1660

1661

1662

1663

1 664

1665

1666

1667

1668

1669

1670

1671

1672

.1673

1674

1675

1676

1677

1678

1679

1680

1681

1682

1683

1684

1685

1686

Page 71: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Burrows

,

1

Grid

Bu #2 Gr. 1'

'

lf

,

i

'

,

i Co-ordinate

L4W 1+OOS

0+00

1+OON

2+OON j

Sample Type "

Soil i

'

1'

; i3+OON

4+OON

5+OON

i- 6+OON

LO 3+OONE

2+OONE

1+OONE

0+00

1+OOSk

2+OOSk

3+OOSk

4+OOSk

5+OOSh

6+OOS1*

1 i "

i .

, i. ' :. -

l

- ;

.

V

.i

.

,

i :

i3 n

1 .1

Horizon

S.S. 10"

T.S. 3"

S.S. . . 13"

T.S. .1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

T.S; l"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 10"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 17"

T.S, 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 5"

S.S.. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 13"

T.S. rS.S. 12"

T, S. . 1"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 10"

T.S, 1/2"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S., 6"

T.S. 1/2"

Sample No.

1687

1688

1689 '

1690

1691

1692

1693

1694

1695

1696

1697

1698

1699

1700

1701

1702

1703

1704

1705

1706

1707

1708

1709

1710

1711

1712

1713

1714

1715,

1716

1717

1718

1719

1720

1721

1722

Page 72: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township \ Grid ' Co-ordinate ; Sample Type |

Burrows \ Bu #2 Gp. 1 LO 6+OOS j Soil:1 - ! ' i :

! ; ' . -; i 5+oosi ' :

i 1 4+oos 1 i . '

i 1' ' .' 1 -\ 3+OOS j

; : i i . \ v i--i j ' 2+OOS P 1 ; 1 -

l . - ' 1 ' ' : ^ !- - :1 1 i+oos l \l ' ' l . ' - . ;^ 0+00* , H

- 1 " i ' . .:3 ' ' - '? ' i '. fJ

'S 1+OON 1

S ' ' . . 1 " ' ! 'f ' . 1 '

, i 2+OON j i

i '- ' i r' . 3+OON ] i

j ' ;

l . - 4+OON I

i ; j ' | ;1 1 5+OON j 1

J ' l 1 '\ \ 6+OON j ".j\ \ ' i :

; 1 ! j . . . .

) Bu #2 Gp. 2 )L12NW 6+OOSWJ\ l* l '

: l - 5+ooswf

l l :fl 4+OOSWJ

i | l j ;3+OOSVl'

. ' ' . ' "l ' \ l

\ 2+OOSW;( '-. ' ' : •} . i

. ^ ' i :

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

S.S

T.S

Horizon

7"

1"

12"

1"

5"

1"

11"

1"

5"

1"

8"

2"

8"

r9"

1/2"

6"

1/2'i4"

1/2"

14"

1"

9"

4"

9"

2"

12"

1"

9"

1"

9"

Sample No.

1723

1724

1725

1726

1727

1728

1729

1730

1731

1732

1733

1734

1735

1736

1737

1738,1739

1740

1741

1742

1743

1744

1745

1746

. 1747

1748

1749

1750

1751 '

1752

1753

1" | 1754i

3" f , 1755

. , 1/2"10"

1756-1757

' i1" | 1758

Page 73: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Burrows

Grid

Bu #2 Gr. 2

Co-ordirmto

L12NW 1+OOSW

0+00

1+OONE

2+OONE

3+OONE

- 4+OONE

5+OONE

6+OONE

L4NW 6+OOSW

5+OOSW

4+OOSW

,. . .... . ... ...

Sample Typo

Soil i

i . '

- '

i! '

j

Horizon

S.S. 13"

T.S. 2"

S.S. TO"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. 1/2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 9"

T.S. T"

S.S. 13"

,. .'.'.,. ... '-. ' . ;

Sample No.

1759

1760

1761

1762

1763

1764

1765

1766

1767

1768

1769

1770

1771

1772

1773

1774

1775

1776

1777

1778

1779

f-

V

Page 74: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Burrows

.

Grid

Bu #2 Gr. 2

j

.... -

Co-ordinate

L4NW 4+OOSW

3+OOSW

2+OOSW

/f 00 W

0+00

1+OONE

2+OONE

3+OONE

Sample Type

Soil

i'

i

' ; . *'

-

. Horizon

T.S. 1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1-1/2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. rS.S. 12"

T.S. 2"

. S.'S. 40"

T.S. . 30"

S.S. 40"

T.S. 8"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

Sample No.

180.0

1801

1802

1803

1804

1805

1806

1807 :

1808 ,

1809

1810

1811

1812

1813

1814

*

Page 75: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEXf

m iTownship |

Burrows

'

.

Fawcett

fGrid l Co-ordinate- 1

Bu #2 Gp. 2 L4NW 4+OONE j

L8NW 6+OONE. '

5+OONE j

4+OONE j, j

3+OONE i

"i i| 2+OONE j

; J 1+OONE

. 1 ' \

l O+OONE

il+OOSWi

1 1 2+OOSW"

. 3+OOSW

. ,

| 4+OOSW.

i | 5+OOSW

i ' '

l 6+OOSW

Gp. 1 |L8W 6+OOSi!

! 5+OOS

jtt

^ \ 4+OOS

j

3+OOSr \

lii

'

Sample 1 Type j

Soil

j

. '

i

.

r

i ii . ;1 '- .

jf . :1 ;

i| '" :

! ' i ' ,l s' - ' ' - : . i

. l - -' . " '

i

1 ; j -

,Horizon

S.S. 1

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S..

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S,

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.,.

S.S.

T, S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

's.s.5IT.S/i S.S.iIT.S.:S.S.iT.S.

Is.s.. T.S.

! S.S.! T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

13"

1"

9"

1"

11"

1"

10"

2"

10"

1"

10"

1"

22"

1"

4"

1"

17"

2"

14"

•3"

32"

6"

4"

2"

10"

1/2"

8".

1"

10" .8"

17"

4"

40"

2"

8"

1"

Sanole No.

, 1815

1816

1817

1818

1819

1820

1821

1822

1823

1824

1825

1826

1827

1828

1829

1830

1831

1832

1833

1834.

1835

.1836

1837

1838

1839

1840-

1841

1842

1843

' 1844

1845

1846

1847

1848

1849

j 1850

1 ' '

Page 76: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

- 9Township

Fawcett

.

1

Grid

Gp. 1

i

i

l i:i

i

li

i !

\

i

'

.p

\Co-ordinate j

L8W 2+OOS

i

1+OOS•1

]

0+00

1+OON;i

2+OON

i

j

3+OONi|

4+OON"1

5+OON

6+OON

L4W 6+OON

5+OON

! 4+OON'

1'

3+OONi

1 2+OON'

1+OONit

0+00

\1+OOS

s|i 2+OOS

|\

Sample Type l

Soil'

1

.

, • '

-

1

.

j

*

l

i*ijj

1:'

(

fl

i ,*

j' -

Horizon

S.S.

ir. s.s.s.T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.,

T.S.

c c o . o .

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

O .b .

T.S.

S.S.

T.S.

6"

2"

14"

•2"

10"

1"

13"

4"

7"

1"

18"

2"

10"

2"

12"

1"

17"

4"

10"

1"

9"

1"

10"

1"

10"

1"

13"

1"'36"

12"

36"*

14"

12"

3"

8"

1"

'

Sample No.

1851

1852

1853

1854

1855

1856

1857

1858

1859

1860

1861

1862

1863

1864

1865

1866

1867

1868

•' 1869

1870

1871

1872

1873

1874

1875

1876

1877.

1878

1879

- 1880

1881

1882

1883

1884

1885

1886

; ,

Page 77: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

r 1 1 Township f Grid jj Co-ordinate j

Fawcett j Gp. 1 j L4W 3+OOS |

-

'

is S

4+OOS 1i

i ' 15+OOS

:j

6+OOS j

|LO 6+OOS ]

1

j 5+OOS |

\ 'l 4+OOS .1

| 3+OOS

1| 2+OOS

jj 1+OOSl

. ii 31 o+ool

j i

\ 1 +OONt i1 i1 . js I]: 3 2+OON 1 1r !: 3+OONf 1? f

' 1 i' j -- 4+OON\ \

\

[ l 5+OON

i 1' 5 r

j . 6+OON

•' t, 1 ? L4E 8+OONi i

Sample Type | Horizon

Soil

'

t

1

ii| .

|

j

" '

:

i ' ji5t. \i

H

,

j

i

i

ii

1

l

l I '

j

f

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

T.S, 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. - 28"

T.S/ 16"

S.S. 36"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. .1"

S.S. 5"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

Sample No.

1887

1888

1889

1890

1891

1892

1893

1894

1895

1896

1897

1898

1899

1900

1 901

1902

1903

1904

1905

1 1906

1907

1 908

1909

19101

1911

1912

1913

T.S. 1" j 1914

S.S. 32" 1915

T.S. 4" i 1916! \i ^

S.S. 9" j . 1917

T.S. 2" 1918j

S.S. 8" j 1919

T.S. 1" ! 1920

S.S.' 12" 1921ii

T.S. 1" I 1922\

* s

Page 78: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCKEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township J Grid | Co-ordinate j Sample Type

Fawcett Gp. 1

-

j' j

1

i

*

j

|

fj ; -.i

' r i

i

L4E 7+OON

6+OON

Soil

5+OON i1 ; - -4+OON 1

3+OON

2+OON

i -

'

1+OON j

i0+00 f

J)11

,

1+OOS i

l 2+OOS

3+OOSl

4+OOS j

j :5+OOS j

!L8E 6+OOS

5 " . .5+OOS

4+OOS

i

iv

3+OOS j

l2+OOS J

j

- j .

1 . 1

Horizon

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 27"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 14"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 22"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 3"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

Sample No.

1 923

1924

1925

1926

1927 '

1928

1929

1 930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

1937

1938

' 1939

1940

1941

1942

1943

1944

1945

1946

1947

1948

1949

T.S. 2" i 1950i

S.S. 18" l 1 951.!

T.S. 2" 1952

S.S. 11" 1953

T.S. 1" j 1954

S.S. 9" j . 1955

T.S. 1" | 1956

S.S. 8" 1957

T.S. 1" j 1958

t'

Page 79: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

t!

Township

Fawcett

'

-

i

Grid

Gp. 1

''

'

Co-ordinate jj

L8E 1+OOS j

0+00

. j

l+OON

2+OON

3+OON

4+OON

5+OON

6+OON

7+OON

L12E 7+OON

6+OON

5+OON

4+OON

3+OON'-

2+OON1

l+OON

0+00

j 1+OOS!H

!1

\ Sample Type

Soil

.

-

' -

i

! .

:

1 v

l ' i*

l

jli ,i 5i : -

Horizon

S.S. 13"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 3"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 6"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 4"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 18"

T.S. .1"

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 11"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 9"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 15"

T.S. ' 1"

S.S. - 14"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 12"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 10"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8",

T.S. 1"

Sample No.

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1 966

1967

. 1 968

1969

1970

1971 '

1972

1973 '.

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1,979

1980

1981

1982

1983

' . 1 984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994 '

'

Page 80: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

GEOCHEM SAMPLE INDEX

Township

Fawcett

1 I Grid | Co-ordinate \ Sample Type

Gp, 1

' -l ' - '

j

L12E 2+OOS

3+OOS

Soil

-

4+OOS 1!

5+OOS

Horizon

S.S. 7"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 17"

T.S. 2"

S.S. 16"

T.S. 1"

S.S. 8"

T.S. 1"

Sample No.

1 995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001 '

2002

Page 81: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

FIGURE 2 2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS . SHINING TREE AREA.

Halliday | 805

(Grid fi) K 806

1 8071? 808l!l 809i 1 810

s! 811rb

: | 812: l

f 81 3! 1•i 8 14

s i 1 ' 815i ' *

j 1 816' ' vi r 8i7 -

[ 818fi

li 819^

l f

16

12

NO

16

8

16

8

16

12

12

.12

24

j 20

i 40i

i 8j

16

14

AMPLE

16

18

12

. 18

. 16

20

8

24

12

16

28

16

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

100

104

58

42

152

28

136

48

132

28

152

152

410

1- wbo

1

8

20

28

12

68

8

60

20

30

8

82

12

i . 138^

lJ 16i

i "

- 1 1

,

ki'iCifi - .j/'

Siu

Page 82: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

w

TOWNSHIP

1

i

, SAMPLE NO. |t;

Halliday

(Grid #1)

: 820

821- L' -

.822

. j. 823. - . 'i'j ' 824 -

825.

J ' 826- ' P. . i . 827

| 828

829 '

830

831

832

833

834

1 835, . - - i* . -

836P ' '

: .- j ' ' 837 " :-

,. '

'

i

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot

Cu

28

4

12

120'44

12

20

NO S

204 -

28

4 .

28

8

12

8

24.

8

j 838 . 24i -' ' - ' \ 839;

- - 840 --v. M

{ 841i* * '

' | 842

[j 843 'l

: ' 1 844

- ' | -845..

| 846

f 847 '. \

1 848 -j .

849' Pf 850

1 851f '1 852

ij 853i

| ' 854

; 855l

1 856

i 4

34

6

16

4

16

4

28

4

4

6"24

-N0i -

36

NO

52' 8

,

8' " ' 1t i

;,) H C'

Ni

. 24

4

8

24

14

12

20

AMPLE

20

16

28

16

20

20

8

12

20

14

24

8

24

20

12

16

16

16

28

12

8

. 20

20

5 AMP LE

24

5 AMP LE

.44

16

12

0^-i!\C

Ag

.5

.5

- .5

,5

-' .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

,5

5

.5

.5

.5

,5

,5

,5

, .5

5

.5

. -5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

..5

3

Zn

384

20

. 116

76

64

40

140

88

24

62

24

72

32

60

32

.144

36

140

16

134

24

84

24

120

26

178

28

44

36

176

.5 118

.5

.5

430

60

ij

Pb |̂120f

Cu

' '8|

44

': 1 2;. - f

22

12

56

72

. 8

60

10

62

-'.12-

38

8

80

10

80

':

. '

j ' ; - . j ' .' ' '

'i12 l .84

12

48

10 !:

60 j

. 10

76

10

. -

. 24

12i ' !

52 \ - .

' 64 j - ,-

106

12 :j'

,5 52 1 20 1

i i l

Ni

'Mti . .......

Ag

'. -

Zn ..

Pb

!

\.

.

^

'l

i

Page 83: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

.4

TOWNSHIP W

Halliday

(Grid 11)

.

1

SAMPLE NO.

857

858

859

860

860B

861

862

863

864

865

866

867

868 .

869

870

.871

872

873

874

875

876

877

878

879

880 881 882

883

884

885

886

887

888

889

890

891

892

893

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f ( Edta)

Cu

4

24

6

12

18

6

16

4

16

8

8

..54

6

. 12

8

24

4

52

4

8

.20

6

44

40

8

28

28

60

8

4

24

4

8

32

N1

20

20

20

12

20

16

16

16

16

28

12

46

14

16

20

.20

24

56

24

24

20

16

52

44

20

32

16

30

8

20

24

16

22

32

Ag.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

..5

.5

.5

.5.

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

• 5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

•5

.5

• 5

,5

.5

• 5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Zn

36

192

56

36

188

28

104

20

68

24

20

58

24

68

28

104

36

180

32

60

96

28

430

224

44

284

100

32

52

48

304

46

44

630

Pb

8

60

16

36

50

10

56

10

50

8

12

16

14

38

12

.56

,12

96

12

12

508 '

82

116

16

74

28 .

16

16

10

80

14

12

108

Cu

. .. .. .....^..-..-.

. ... . . ..

i

-

Ni

t

-

Ag

t.

Zn .

,

Pb

Page 84: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

p- J

TOWNSHIP W j SAMPLE NO.

.......^ t 894fi

(Grid #1) 895

j 896i

. . | 897f l 898 .i

i 8991 -

1 . 900i

. 901

' | 902

903

.i 904

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.P. M. .

(Hot) HC104 -HN03 i ' ( Edta )

Cu28

Ni Aq Zni?

Pb \ C u .k \ "i28

6; 20

8

6

8

4

4

4

32

8

20

j 905 8' 'i; 906 20i

907 8

908 6

909.

910i!

•j 911

i 912i 9 13t'.

\ 9 14ij

1 9 16|1 917f

918Vf 1

I 9195'

[ 920•'1 9 21

S .922;

j 923

l 924. Jir 1

l 925ai 926

j 927

i; 928

' 929!

l 930f

. g

24

4

12

8

8

8

16

34

4

,n 20|

1 . 4l

30i

4

20

26

60

i 4

32

4

20ii 24| 28

i

12

20

20

12

6

18

28

20

24

20

16

24

8

20

8

16

20

24

12

30

42

8

16

16

20

12

. 16

. 34

44

16

30

12

24

34

24

.5: 540 |- 100 jj .

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

.5

.5

. .5

• 5

.5

.5

• 5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

;5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

26

108

26

72

20

54

24

180

30

148

22

88

18

16

40

16

50

22

28

24

30

148

20

140

28

380

46

302

236

308

30

440

34

242i

12 j. ; .

- ' 28 jK

12 ,

40 l8

.10'

24

12

116

16

62

10

60

14

12

36

- 6:

30

6

4' :'

16

16

10

72

. .

:

-

.

;

;j

8

48 j ''

8 1

68 j

12

70

8

12 ;t

82

10

44 ' \ \ ;

\ ''i

.5 112 \ 1 6 i:i -e - ;

.5 - 148 j 60 :;

} .

Ni"

Ag l Zn .t

' ' r1|

i1

. ls

;

Pb

t

ii

l . .

5

|

4

1* 'i

l l '

Page 85: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.P.M.•:

• iTOWNSHIP i SAMPLE NO.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 . | . . ( Edta)

CuF . . j

Halliday | 931

(Anomaly #1)1 932 .

' ' i 933 -: .. . ] ' ' 934 . .^,

p

. - j 935' ' l

936' F

| 937 "

i '938• i

939i

1 940

. .. .....-.-•... .--'i 941 "-

942

j 943

944

945

i 946

J 947i

fi " - '

' i 948jj . 949 .iii 950

j. 951 'K

l 952R

P '953

j! 954V-'i 9 55;

956i 957

1 958^1 959

| 960; j

| 961lly'

l 9 62

.j 963i -l 964

l 9 65f: 966

j 967j 1.ti 968i

l -

4

20

4,

. 24

4

40

4

12

8

28

4.'44

8

12

16

16

14

16

20

14

18

16

16

12

6024

4

32

8

i 16

40

24

32

16

10

12

: 2 4i

1 8

.

•Ni

8

16.

20

20

24

40 .

24

12

28

28

20

40

24

12

8

16

8

12

4

4

8

8

8

4

80.2012

28

12

.12

.32

16

12

- 12

8

12

12

12

Ag.5

.5.

. ..5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

'--..5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

Zn22

146

32

208

34

86

26

38

20

70

28

138

20

46

50

48

44

100

26

28

28

36

40

52

749038

212

22

66

56

44

60

40

, .5

.5

.5

.5

30

34

42

40

1 Pb 1. Cu

lil

•14 1

.48. l . .

16 '

48 ji

•'12 | -

82

12

36

12

72

14

90

10

38

10

; 1210

50

6

10

12

14

6

12

124610

72

. -

•i

!'i

8

32

12

168'- \

. ;! '6 ij

814'

. 8

20 6i

Ni1

Ag 1 Zn .?

|

'^i

•'

Pb

-

.

it i l

j

. jt 1

i

Page 86: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.P.M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 (Edta)m

TOWNSHIP^ 1 SAMPLE NO.

Halliday 9691 1

(Anomaly #1} j 970

l 971

1 972r! 973i

974 .il 975

j 976

i 977S1 9 78

i 979n

980

981

982

983

984

985

j 986

l 987P '1 988Rj 989l'i 990

i 991' .

i 992i\ 993i'I 994t.l 9 95jji 996il 997j]f 998

l 999t't1000

f!'] 1 001

f\ 1 002

l 1 003i :r 1004

11

Cu1 Q

1 O

12

8

8

20

16

12

12

10

22

14

16

4

16

4

20

4

24

4

2411 4

j 22

! 8

18j1 *ii 1 4i 41j 36

1 4

36

4i

24ij 4

12

4

i 1 6j

t

Ni12

12

6

8

12

12

20

16

24

20

28

24

24

16

16

24

20

28

24

24

16

24

24

16

16

16

20

36

12

28

14

28

16

8

18

20

Aq :

' 5 i

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

...5J

.5

.5

.5

•5

•5

.5

.5.

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

..5

.5

.5

s

jZn

40

54

40

44

24

26

34

36

32

64

30

30.

24

72

22

64

26

136

46

182

36

216

60

134

40

140

48

160

36

180

28

122.

32

52

42

86

pb S8 j

30 i

•' 12 j

24 i

8^- 8!

' .10'- 8!

12

10

46

O

8

6

46

14

64

• : 10

80

10.72

8

64

6

68

12

44

12

82

8

70

12

76

14

24

32

l 5 61

j

Cu .

.

:'

'

'

1ji

i

|

i.

i'if ' -

[tj;'j 1,

Jji-

1

lii•i i)

;jj!

j'iiii.;ri'

: .

rlP 'fiY.

' t

ij;f:

'l

1f

(j in

\\i;

i . .

E - '

Ni Ag \-

\

.

\

Zn .

l!

Pb

t

\*i

i\\ii

1i\itt

Page 87: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

.'

TOWNSHIP

Halliday

(Anomaly #1)

-

'

! SAMPLE NO.

! 1005

1006

! .10071

1008

| 1009

1010

ion1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

- 1017

1018 ;

. 1019

1020:

.1 1021J ! .

. ' l ' 1022 '

f 1023*I , 1024.

| 1025

| 1 026

- , . l - . 1027 "

1 1028

1029- i -

1, 1 030

j 1031

"- - . ; | 1032

. 1 1 033

1 1034 (

J 1035 i ! 1036

1037 .

1038

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu

4

8

4

4

6

12

14

12

24

32

4

.12

4

24

60

160

26

20

34

32

36

32

12

12

12

16

NO

18

4

14

i 1 4

12l1 1 039 32f f 1040 26f ' Fi'!

!i '.;;

Ni12

8

6

4

6

10

12.

8

20

24

12

10

20

28

28

28

24

24

20

32

32

24

32

10

20

16

SAMPLE

8

10

16

24

20

36

24

A9.5

,5

.5' .5

'••5,

.5

,5

. .5

.5

' -5

: .-5

.5

.5

.5

•....5

.5

.5'

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

1.0

.5

Zn26

40

12

20

28

48

20

24

80

108

28

64

34

268

60

104

84

246

48

, 44

128

88

44

76

24

40

96

20

72

40

96

110

92

Pb \

(Edta)

Cu l Ni' ' - I2 i" -18J

::

.8 !1-2

•12

20

8

16

52

80

10

48

12

80-14

.52

14

52

40

; 24; 14

18

20

48

i . ' - f . .i

5 - .

ii; .

j ••••-i!,'. . .|-.". . "

'.

14

32

, 40

12

52

16,

; 4428

52

•' . i'

Aq

'

i

Zn . Pb

-

-

ti '

-

\ 'it Q

i

Page 88: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.P.M.

. ' i• i S SAMPLE NO.

. - 5Halliday

(Anomaly #1)

i 1041

1042

| 1043 .

f 1044

'

t"

-

.

'

1 045

1046

1047:1 1 048

1049.

! 10501 1051 .

1052

1053

1054

1055

1 056

f

'

1057

1 1058It\ 1 059l!

1 1060

i]p

. i. 106211

, ,. | 1063' . . i

^ -s1 1064

1 1065' . ^

' | . ' * 1066F

. 'j 1067B '.J!

1 1068| 'j . 1069

j 1 070

1 1071

! 1072i| '

1073BS 1074|3 1075Sf 1076

i 1 077ijt 1078- s1'

(Hot) HC104-HN03 j ( Edta)

Cu

10

12

4

36

10

10

84

80

4

206

24

4

10

4

18

4

14

4

. 4

12

28

6

36

76

24

16

28

4

20

4

24

4

.24

8

38! ' ' 4

40

Ni

20

12

24

28

. 12

16

34

40

18

142420

24

8

14

16

12

12

20

16

8

28

12

28

24

16

12

28.

20

20

20

28

22

28

28

36

22

34

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

;5.5

,5

.5

..5

.5' .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

•5

.5

.-••5

•5.

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

:' .51 -'

•: .5

•5

•5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•.5

Zn l Pb' l Cui50

40

40

150

76

40

128

116

24

15832

294

- 32

60

28

124

30

66

40

40

78

152*

20:70

84

34

56

68

28

68

32

96

36

98

54

128

44

266

1 '16

20 j

i2j140 jj . ,

40

10

28

36

10

801480

10

64

: 1472

12

40

14

12

40

. 88

16

60

34

16

20

! 42'12

52

16

70

12

56

14

.

; ' ' '

i ' ' ' ' - '

i ' 'i -j;

-

i ' ' : .s

1

ii ' '

r :-

i. '- -. ;: 68 r '

12 j

84lI i

Ni Ag i Zn .\l

. l'

-

\

Pb

ii

!j

" - | ' ,i

j

Page 89: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

- iTOWNSHIP f" SAMPLE NO.

Halliday j 1079

(Anomaly #l)f 1080

-

1081

1082

1083

1084

1085

1086

1087

1088

1089

1090

1091

1092

1093

1094

1095

| 1096

| 1097

J 1098 .

1 1099;

.

i 1100

j 1101

11021. I 1103

' l 1104'

j 1105

1106

f 1107B

1108

1109 .

momi1112

1113

1 1114l

. l 1 115.

i '

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 j ( Edta)

Cu

4

16

NO :16

, 4

16

6

22

6

12

4

8

4

24

4

14

12

Ni

6

12

AMPLE

12

8

12.

14

20

20

12

24

12

20

20

20

16724

323 26

.4

24

8

24

4

32

4

10

14

88

44

6

40

8

36

6.

40

4

16

20

16

16

16

28

20

8

28

4

16

32

20

40

24

40

20

44

. 16

Aq

,5

.5

.5

.5-

.5

,5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

,5

.5

-5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.-5

.5

t u

ct *J

.5

.5

.5

.5

. -5

Zn26

120

66

20

84

20

52

26

44

32

88

' 56

510

48

160

32

188

22

120

38

120

36

220

24

24

30

30

32

164

40

224

32

, 264

24

130

20

Pb I Cu '

8

40

42'lo

52

10

70

12

34

10

38

14

92

16

42

18

92

12

88

14

44

16

112

12

20

1

1

j ;

.

j

1 -

f

l

j. yp

i!

'

.

i '

12

24

10 l

76

12

106

14

.100

16

96

j 1.2

j

; .

|r \ .

1- '.'-'

l

Ni Ag f Zn .

! .t

H

i

r

Pb

i

!ti -

Page 90: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TOWNSHIP 1 SAMPLE NO.

Halliday j 1116lil

(Anomaly #l)j 1117

i me .j . 1119

1120

1121-

i 1122i

1123

1 1 124jif 1125

1126

1127

1128j1

1129

i 1130- ii ii3i' i!| H 32

f 113311 1134

| 1135R

j] 1 136

! 1137

j 1138

1139r!

| 1140

i 1 141" ! l 142

11143

r

| 1144

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M:

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f ( Edta)

Cu

24

NO

24

8

32

8

36

4

24

12

32

20

24

8

28

4

20

4

40

36

24

.NO

16

8

12

1 41j 20jJ. 8!

l 1 01 p| 1145S! 1146P,j ' 1147fl

| 1148 '

f 1149

! 1150

Ni

24

SAMPLE

28

20

32

24

44

14

24

20

36

32

20

16

16

4

16

20

36

40

20

SAMPLE

20

32

14

12

20

28

16

Ag 1 'Zn

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5'•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

64

160

40

88

36

252

24

72

34

272

32

92

20

236

16

76

24

244

144

100

72

24'64

20

180

iPb I Cu

: 52 |'

; l; n \ ..14 1

108 1

,14|V

86

14

44

12

100

14

84

6

68

10

80

12

.

''

, . " '.

h132 1-

22

36

28

1 '"

l - .y

ll

: 10 |fi

.36

10

54

28

56i

12

i

i.1 - '6

; 28 jb

i NO SAMPLE .:: . . , ;" [;.i

72

4

20

6

38: 1 ' ,

\ 1 151 NOr H

' ii

4 ' tt

.

38

24

•5

.5ti24]' ,5

20

36

SAMPLE

.5

.5t .

276

24

96

; 40,

188

|i 94 [ .

141 60

12

.76

1 r.!

l ' ''

j.

: ' - ' -\ s* .

; !

j ' ,;

j

Ni Ag 1 Zn .

' j

. 1t

'

Pb

'

ji

l - -

i

' . 1

,'

Page 91: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

.TOWNSHIP

- Halliday

(Anomaly #1

j

i

SAMPLE NO.

| 1-152

) 1153

1154

1155 -

1156

1157

1158

1159

1160

1161

1162

1163 .

1164

1165

1166

1167.

1168

1169

1170

' 1171

1172 '

1173

1174

.1175

1176

1177

11781

1179t*1180

-

~

-

j 1181,ij 1182:

J 1183 i1 1 184 -

1185i

| 1186rj

l 1 187

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104 -HN03 j ( Edta)

Cu

38

4

38

6

30

4-36

8

20

6

28

10

12

4

32

4

32

4

28

6

32

16

32

36

34

12

40

44

44

NO

32

4

12

8

22

10

Ni

32

24

36

16

32

16

34

16

20

12

32

24

16

16

36

16

28

12

32

12

36

44

28

32

36

32

36

32

. 24

SAMPLI

24

24

. 20

20

28

18

A9.5

.5

.5' ,5

•5

.5

.5'-.'.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

, -5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

t

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

Zn176

64

220

36

260

40

244

52

126

52

200

48

88

40

164

30

336

24

56

20

100

48

244

92

98

62

72

72

08

116

24

92

36

184

52

Pb78

14

114

12

; 98

10

1 00

12

. 44

14

78

12

34'.10

70

10

94

8

] 68

10

68

12

. 96

20

42

12

60'58

56

80

Cu

i

is tijj

i

t '

i

j

l

\1

\f!

i!

1

12 l -' .48 |

i12

90

. 16

.j

i

\ T ;

i- l

Ni Aq Zn . Pb

i

t

j

j

Page 92: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TOWNSHIP

\

SAMPLE NO.

Halliday j 1188i

, -(Anomaly Jl )g ., 1189

^ ~ - - l '1190 .

- | 1191- .

'

.

1192

1193

1-194,

1195

1196

.1197 .

1198

1199

1200

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

| 1207

| 1 208liB 1209jf 1210P li)| 1211li

1212

| 1213i!i

i 1 2141I 1215'

12168 .

ANALYTICAL 'RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN0 3 | ( Edta)

Cu

20

NO

34

10

28

4

28

8.

40

4

20

4

40

4

18

8

18

: 430

816

i4

32

8i

40

8jt

44

10

j 24

. | 1217 I 8

1 1 218tj 121931 1220f| 1221

t

16

i 1 0

j 24

162 ' l l 1 222 | 121 1 1 223 12

i l

Ni

28

SAMPL

32

22

30

10

26

18

34

16

26

12

32

12

20

24

18

16

26

18

16

14

32

26

36

13

32

20

28

19

16

28

26

28

16

27

Ag

.5

. t '

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

1.5

'-r.. 5

.5

•5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

' .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5ij

Zn

410

450

54

100

30

254

44

272

36

7436'

168

. 52

84

68

204

78

212

50

92

52

180

64

700

72

220

56

348

24

56

24

112

20

Pb fi Cu1

72

148

18

'

j . -: ;,68 j

12

84

14

108

12

60

10

72

12

48- ' '

14

50

j. ;. ' -' -it . . -

i'

10 i78

12

j-;- :,

42 ;i

12

84

16

86

. 14

88

12

80

12' t'44 | .

•i12 !i!

H80

14

52 36| :

20 ; 14

ij . .

,

l

tt

i

u

Ni Aq l Z n .

r '

;

'

Pb

i

1

li'

. fi

ji\'f

il -1

' ' . ji

i

f

j

Page 93: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

r '

TOWNSHIP

Halliday

(Anomaly #1

.

SAMPLE NO.

1224

1225

1226

1227

1228

1229

1230

1231

1232

1233

1234

1235

1236

1237

1238

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.P. M:

(Hot) HC104-HN03 l

Cu

16

8

12

NO S

26

10

22

NO S

50

12

40

16

36

12

20. ;

Ni

16

14

12

AMPLE

20

15

16

AMPLE

20

9

36

20

28

18

12

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

'Zn

38

16

. 52

36

20

44

40

28

84

. 24' 76

26

52

(Edta)

Pb 1 Cu1

36

10

24'

44

10

44

76

20

112

14

80

12

22

i

i i' . J,.

Ni Ag Zn . Pb

'

*

Page 94: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

V

^

tTOWNSHIP

Knight

: SAMPLE NO.

1289i1 i

(Anomaly #li ) 1290

1291

| 1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1297

1298i, 1299

1300H

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 j ( Edta)

Cu

8

16

4

44

NO

46

NO

60

8

16

6

16

1 301 4

1302

1303

1304

18

6

12

f 1305 6a

l 1 306

'.

.

l 1307

18

6.b '

1 308

i 1309i! 1310

.1311i•' | 1 312

: 1 -' 1313.' "-.' l ' '

| 1314

- 1315t

1316

1 1317

1. . 1318

: f 1319

| 1320*i i 1321B

1322

- j :1323

J. | 1324

:' . -- r '

30

4

16

6

32

4

20

j 1 2,

36

6

20

6

36

6

24

8

j 24

-- - J' ' ' ; J. -

Ni

80

56

48

172

SAMPLE

58

SAMPLE

44

68

44

42

36

16

28

24

12

24

18

20

32

16

20

00

36•20

20

24

40

16

20

2 4

40

20

20

12

28

Ag

.5

•5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

, .5

, .5

•5

•' .5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

Zn

64

80

36

132

224

148

28

40

22

-100

20

60

20

52

28

112

26

124

32

: 80'

26

400

48

212

42

340

24

68

24

172

40

120

36

94

'.Pb 1 Cui

16

36

8

92

136

68

8

14

8

48

8

52

;12

28 ;12

44

12

76 .

10

40

12

80

8

48

16

82

10.

40

12

100

12

72

'-. 8

60

.

i

; i .

i

i

tjif.

\1

.

V - - -

(l

S,

- . , .

.'

:

y ' - - '

i ' ' '

i ' ''

; ' '. " .

j

•j.'

'! : 'i i

NiI

Ag \ Zn ,

ii

. | ' '

•' j

*

Pb

l

Page 95: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

k

TOWNSHIP SAMPLE NO.S

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P

(Hot) HC1Q4-HN03 f

Cu Ni Ag Zni

i

Pb i Cui ' a -. .

.P.M.

(Edta)

Ni Ag l Zn .,' Pb

Knight ji;

(Anomaly #J8)

f1287 . 4"

1288 | 12; ii

j

24

20

.5

.5

24

80'

t- ' '8 1; [i

32i , - -

1!•'i ?

i - i

- ;

i

r:

Page 96: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

i,

TOWNSHIP

Knight

(Anomaly #18

.

SAMPLE NO.

1325

l) 1326

1327 '

1328

1329

1 330

1 331

1332

1333

1334

1335

1336

1337

1338

1339

1340

1341

1 342

1343

1344

1345-

1346

1347

i 1348i - !1349

1350

1351

1352

f 1353

l 1 3541 f 1355

1 1356i

1357

1358*

j 1359t| 1360•'i

i

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 j

Cu

6

36

10

24

8

40

16

36

4

40

12

42

NO S

18

NO S

32

14

20

6

24

4

26

8

34

8

20

70

130

8

26

12

28

8

20

78

| 80

Ni16

44

28

32

20

48

28

36

20

40

36

36

AMPLE

16

AMPLE

60

124

64

36

70

50

48

22

44

20

16

. 104

148

. 30

28

24

26

20

16

72

114

Afl.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

* *.J

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

\5

.5

.5

.5

,5

• 5

.5

.5

,5

,5

Zn28

240

24

196

40

430

24

84

24

160

24

64

32

60

32

78

28

132

24

. 76

22

72

12

26

20

24

20.

192

20

192

20

; 56

112

272.

(Edta)

Pb i Cui

12

112

12

76

14

156

12

116

16

128

20

96

•28

58.

14

40

8

58

12

76

12

78

12

44

16

28

12 .

88

16

92

12

,44

. 16

28

'

,

. .

1 '

i ii i

j ' :1

it

j•1

i i ,

iirj

Ni ' Aq 1 Zn i

'

Pb

Page 97: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

t,

4

TOWNSHIP

Knight

(Anomaly #18)-

.

'

i

' SAMPLE NO,

j 1361

i 1362

! 1363

1364i

1365

1 366

1367

1368

1369

1370

1371

1372

1373

1374

1375

1376

1377

1378i 1

| 1379'

' ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

. (Hot) HC104-HN03 f ( Edta)

Cu

8

24

8

20

16

38

10

28

4

36

4

30

NO S

40

36

26

4

34

8

. 1380 .141

! 1381 4l -.., l" .j- . - 1382

: 1 1 1383

. ' 1384

' : J "1385. . '. '

J 1386V -li

1387

. ; . 1 1388

l 1389

'.' ' . . 1390

1391

1392

1393 ;-1394 .

| 1395

\ 1 396

l 1 397 ;

. 1' ;

20

4

32

4

24

6

16

6

32

12

6

8

20 .

: 12

12

6

Ni

24

. 24

20

20

32

32

18

24

20

52

20

24

AMPLE

104

440

120

80

268

72

32

28

24

36

38.

24

28

22

. 16 .

16

20

26

8

22

.16

14

12

24

Ag

.5

.'5

.5- . 5

.5

-.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

•5

v' .5

•. .5

.5

' -5

.. .5

.5

; .5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Zn

36

144

20

72

24

192

38

112

- 44

960

76

470

144

38

40

28

12832'

52

20

100

32

144

28

68

32

132

40

376

. 24

24

20

92

60

52

2.0.

Pb 1 Cu

16i

80

10

72

10

100

20

68

12

184

12

92

104

22.

62

12

92

14

52

10

80

16

108

16

84

16

56

14

. 48 .

12

20

8

52

24

36

12

l - j -

!ri. ,'-

i

i

j ' -.'-,

j- :' . ;i 'i .I.- . '- . \\ ' ' 'i'i, : .i-i L '

1 ' '

Ni Ag Zn .

i

Pb

'

i

Page 98: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

'l.

TOWNSHIP

.

-

SAMPLE NO.

Knight j 1398

(Anomaly. #18;

:'

'

1399

1400

1401

. . 1402

1403

1404

1405

i 1406

i 1407i -

1408

1409

1410

1411

1412

1413

1414

1415i

14161 E 1417 .B

' 1 1418

1 1419' ' '1

| 1420

i| 1421i '

1422

1423

1424

1 1425

1426

1427M

j . 1428

' f. ' 1429- ' : fj | ' '

1 1430. '

: ;! 1 431

. . f 1432

. ' j'" 1433 ; .(\ ' .

lf

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu

8

22

20

12

26

8

38

12

36

46

38

12

40

8

30

8

.8

24

20

12

12 .

12

12

NO !

40

4

4

6

16

16

20

28

16

8

30

6

. ,

Ni

12

22

24.

20

24

20

36

24

36

104

44

24

40

22

28

10

6'6

8'4

10

8

8

AMPLE

28

12

8

.16

.14

12

12

20

12

.22

32

16

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

1.0

..5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.' .5

.5

.5

.5

..5

,5

,5

.5

' ,5

.5

.5

.5

,5

• 5"'-.5

.5

Zn32

24

56

24

60

40

440

28

188' 28

48,

24

156

20

220

12

22

22

20

16

30

20

28

88

16

20

16

44

38.

, 46

92

96

16

80

16

Pb

16

12

74

•; 12

52

16

132

16

108

16

36

12

60

12

92

121 14

8

12

8

20

4

8

68

8

8'4

40

8

24

16t

40.

: 8

64

4

(Edta)

Cu

ii j iii - .t

i if

i!

r . -l

i

iiji'" - :j V . . V|. ;is ';

'

1 . -'

- f•;. t

NiI -

Aq f Zn .-

Pb .

v

Page 99: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

k

TOWNSHIP

Knight

(Anomaly #18

.

"-

SAMPLE NO.

1434.

! 1435 -

1436 .

1437

1438

1439

1440

1441

1442

1443i-1444

1445

1446

1447

1448

1449

1450

l 1451

i 1 452i

1453

j 1454

j 1455

j 1456

| 1457

1 1458i

' , J 1459

1460

1461

1462

1463

i 1464

\ 1 465

1 1466

| 1467

' f, 1468

i K69B

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03. ; j ( Edta)

Cu

16

4

16

4

12

4

10

6

12

6

8

4.

12

4

124'

12

8

10

12

' 18

8

20

NO

18

44

32

10

44

4

28

6

30.4 '

10

4

*

Ni

12

10

12

8

8

8

4

12

16

1,6

. 12

12

16

16

18

28

16

24

14

24

24

20

24

SAMPLE

18

26

26

32

62

20

36

28

36

16

16

18

Ag

.5

.5

- ..5

' .5

.5

,5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

• 5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

k "

,5

.5

;s.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Zn60

. 12

60

12

44

12

32

. 14

. 76

20

38

12

120

20

108

20

136

30

66

24

96

. 60

160

100

28

52

28

120

24

184

32

208

20

80

20

i ' Pb

44

12.

. 52

4

30

6

; lo: 4

44

4

16

4

34.

". 8

32

10

40

! 1 2

j 36

8

: 44

12

72

60

16

3.2

10

126

12

112

14

112

8

24

10

Cu

-

i .

; ,' '

j '

l.; f '

Ni Ag i Zn . Pb

Page 100: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

l

li ^TOWNSHIP™

r1 SAMPLE NO.

e . . " Knight \ 1 470

(Anomaly #18J) 1471'. - . - -

:-, l . : '

'

1 472

1473..

1474

1475

1476 .

1477

! 1478

1479

1480

1481

1482

1483

1484

1485

l I486-ii

'

| 1487ii-. 1488.i

1489

i 1490it

1491

1492

1 1493

1494

J 1495

. 1496

Knight J 1497

(Anomaly #18) 1498

1499

1 500!

1501

1502ij 1503. f| 1504 ,r

|, 1505it ii

f

J

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f ' ( Edta)

Cu -

24

4

20

6

22.

4

36

6

32

-4

20

6

24

6

28

4

12

10

36

SAMP

16

12

NO S

8

6

32

8

8

34

N1 .

32

16

20

22

40

18

28

20

32

28

16

20

32

20

32

20

16

22

32

LE MIS

6

4

UMPLE

4

2

4

4

2

8

'Aq

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

'rr,5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

;ING.

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Zn136

28

138

32

128

24

132

24

400

•24

96

16

204

28

204

20

132

46

264

36

14

21

10

36

20

17

24

Pb ;96

Cu "

4s

48

4

40

16

88

12

112

12

i 48

8

80

12

92

' :. '8

52

14

152

, '

'

20

8

20

8

20

16

16

16

-

.i '

. ,

i

; ' :i ii; ''ii l

1

i

1

Ni A9 Zn .

*

Pb

'

.

Page 101: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

t

TOWNSHIP SAMPLE NO.S

Knight J 1506•f .(Anomaly #18) 1507 '

1

' . .

.•- .

1508

1509

1510

1511

. 1512

1513 ..

1514

1515

1516

. 1517

1518 '

'1519;1520

1521

............'.—r-- j 1522•3 . .' .

i .1523

i 1524

1525

j 1526

1 1527 .•.

.

.

j 1528t

i 1529

j .1530

j 1531

1532

f 1533

| 1534

~

; 1535i | 1536

j- 1537

\ 1 538 .

' 1539

f 1540i - i 541' "i

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P, P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f. ' ( Edta) .

Cu

32

8'

16

6

•12.

6

34

4

16

. 6

36

6

12

4

28

6

24

168

128

24 .

16

4

28

4

30

4

16

4

14

8

16

4

20

16

28

8

Ni

12

12

. 14 .

20

12

16

32

14

16

20

40

18

16

s 16

32

24

20

10

12

6

•4

14

20

16

28

24

20

22

16

40

28

16

22

92

60

14

Ag

,5

' .5

,5

,5

•5

.5

.5

- . . 5 .

•.'..5-

.5

.5

•5

' ,5

.5

' .5.

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. -5

. . 5

.5

- .5

,5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

' .5

.5

- .5

.5

2n

40

16

44

16

64

16

172

12

66

20

224

26

86

14

104

18

156

64

86

30.

48

16

230

22

228

24

92

20

104

84

100

12

52

- 80

180

52

Pb

20

36

12

32

12

128

10

60

12

176

- 16

52

12

80

10

80

16

12

18

32

12

92

8

' 105

, 1 2

72'16

56

10

44

6

96

- 16

1 52

.12

Cu

,* '

'

\ ' ' '

r '.j ' ;j

Ni Ag ( ' 2n .

'. .

-.

S

' P b

'!

Page 102: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

*

*

*TOWNSHIP

Knight ;

(Anomaly #18}

'- . ' i '

SAMPLE NO.

1542

1543,. '1544

1545

1546

1547

1548!

1549

1550i . . - i

. 1551

1552

15531 ' " -

1554

1555 ;

1556

1557

1558 -

1559

1560

\ ; 1561 .

l 1562i -

i 1563

' . j' 1564.

... : ' - .

\ J 565 ' :

j 1566 .

i 1567; !

^'- l 1 568. .f! - '

^ ' 1- 1569

' \ 1 570'•^- i; , _ . ...----.

1 1 571

j 1 572

i! 15731 ^ .:. \ "1574

|

\ 1 575\ ' 1576 -'

l 1 577P

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 | ( Edta)

Cu

28

8

26

8

40

4

20

4

36

4,

48

8

12

4 .

32.4-;20

8.

28

440'

4

32

4.

40

4

52

4

36

8

16

42

28

36

28

20

ii S "-'

Ni

36

30

36

28

36

22

20

22

36

4

40

22

24

20

36

12

. 20

20

32

20

44

20

32

16

44

12

68

1&:32

20

.14

28

32

32

36

12

i A9

.5

.5

,.5

•5

.5',5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•' .5

•5

' -5

.5

.5

.5.'

' ; .5

.5

.5

,5

.5: ',5

,- .5

-5'.5

.51 .5

:,:.J5

,5

.5

. -.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Zn

380

40

300

32

290

28

230

22

248

16

520

38

180

28

352

28

120

. 40

290

44

420

50

510

40

820

18

580

270

24

50

44

46

36

34

26

32

Pb

88

10

j 92

i 8

132

; 10

"60

1096

4

1 164.

10

44

8

. 104

6

48

20

92

8

116

; 14

116

10

96

8

156

: 8

104

: 10

52

: 16

20

16

24

24

Cu

•;; ; '';,'.

ii . ii ' .> 'i . ' ^l j ,-is . -

Ni Ag

,

-.

Zn . Pb

.

Page 103: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

t

TOWNSHIP

Knight

(Anomaly #18

i SAMPLE NO.

1578

) 1579

1580

1581

1582

1583

j 1584

1585

1586

1587t

1588

1589[j

.1590'

.

.

'

1 591

1592

1593

1594

1595

j 1596

j 1597

j 1598 .

\ 1 599j

1600 .

1601

1602*

1603

1604

1605

1606

1607

| . 1608

1609

1 1610

1611

f . 1612f k

. 1613.

V | 1614

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P, M.

(Hot) HClp4-HN03 ; | - . ( Edta )

Cu

14

12

8

8

8

8

8

8

12

8

4

10.

12

8

6

6

8

12

6

12

14

6

12

4

12

4

4

6

8

16

20

20

16

36

.16

4

24

Ni .

8

8

10

6

4

6

4

. 4

10

2

4

6

8

4

4

4

8

6

4

6

12

20

' 12

4

10

4

6

6

, 8

8

8

16

38

24

16

16

24.

Ag

. .5

,5

.5'i 5

,5

.5.'.5

.5

-5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

-5

•5

.5

,5

•' .5

- .5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

' ,5

.5

.5

.5

Zn30

32

• 40

20

24

28

24

40

44

16

20

32

40

16

16

: 14

44

10

8

22

60

24

.36

12

40

18

28

16

28

32

22

20

200

28

126

18

194

: Pb

12

40

32

16

..'16

20

20

' 20

•34

8

.16

28

40

12

8

12

36

8

10

12

52

20

16

: 840

8

14

- 1 2

20

! 16

20

;.io24

• 6

r 3212'

Cu -

! ; .- so f. . ;

Ni '

.

Ag l Zn .

j

-

-

Pb

-

Page 104: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

y '

TOWNSHIP

Knight

{Anomaly #18

-. ^

' .

~~ ,

~ . . ...-.-....'.-— ~-

SAMPLE NO.

1615

1616 '

1617

1618

1619

1 620

1621

"1622 .

1623

1624

1625

1 626

1627

1628

1629

1 1630

J 1631•i

.

-

-

1632

! .1633

1634

1635\

1636i i1 1637\

' .

;

i 1638

1639 i

1640

1641

. - -.1642.1. .

' ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 : | . (Edta)

Cu

2

16

3

' 16

4

24

4

24

8

14

NO S

52

3

12. 4-

^24

8

26

6

30

24

44

NO i

20

6

18

4

.24

N1

16

16

20

20

20

28~ 20

. 32

24

24

AMPLE

40

20

28

24

24

20

36

24

36

20

20

AMPLE

' 44

: 40

32

24

32

Af

.5

T-;-

. 5

' .5

c

Zn

. 18

284

18

86

38

. 364

34

380

20

96

384

16

100

18

340

18

104

20

248

.' 30

50

450

36

204

20

: 206.

Pb I Cu; 8

36

8

36

8

48

12

60

8

36

132

8

52

10

68

12

44

92

12

i 24

; ,- -.

28

10

40

1 4 ;88

'

"' : ' ;".'; :

' i

. . . ii ' -r.- -i

- .- ' ••' i

iis. -. -. , ..

Ni Ag

'

•'•Zn..

'

. '

-

Pb '

Page 105: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

t

. V

TOWNSHIP

'

; SAMPLE NO.1,

Burrows ji 1 651

{Bu #2, Gp l) 1652. . . ' t .

.

'

i 1653

1654.

1655

1656

1657

1658

1659

1660

1661

1662

1663

1664

1665

j 1666

1 1667•l" | 1668^ ~~ - - ' \ ' ~'

.^'

5 1669 -j

J 670i\ 1 671ti 1 672ii

,,:,J 1673

- | 1674

'f 1675 :

j 1676

•1677

l 1 678[l1 1 679

l 1 680c

1681l -

16828| 1683.|

- 1684 '•^1685

f 1686

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu

6

14

4

18

10

20

B.'ip.

6

9,':'4- :

4

3

12

5

1

2

1

2

4

4

4

12

. 8

8

16

2

6- ^

2

8

2

4

4

4

2

4

I"

Ni

28

32

•20

16

40

22

36

12

16

16

20

8

16

10

16

8

20

8

-22

10

12

6

28

24

16

12

12

8

- 20

12

8

6

24

10

20

8

Ag.5

• 5

. .5

• 5

.5

,5

.5

.5

. -5

-5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

,5

- ;.5

.5

.5

- ' .5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.57 -5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.•.

;. Z n .

36

232

32

132

40

216

26

60

36

124

24

36

24

. 36

20

6

28

TO

20

20

16

15

18

18

14

84

10

24

14

36

15

20

20

18

16

18

Pb12

96

14

46

12

48

8

.16

6

40

8

12

8

16

4

4

4

4

6

16

8

16

10

.8

4

36

4

16

4

20

6

.8

. 4

8

4

12

(Edta) '

' Cu

. .' ;

.;: ;-v

,,"'

. '

i p -

p i

1 . :. . ''r :i :l ,\ ;

r ' 'iii,1iil -1tf i

Ni

^

Afl'

j .

Zn .

•'. ; -

,

Pb

'.

•' ' :

f

ii'i

- ' '1

'i

'•' ; J

f

l

1

l

i

Page 106: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

f

TOWNSHIP^

Burrows

SAMPLE NO.

1 687

(Bu #2, Gp l| 1688

j 1689

1 690

1691

-

1692

1693

1694-J 1695

j

1696

1697

1698

1699

1700

1701

1702

1703

l 1704P\ 1 705

I 1 706

j. 1707

! 1708

j .1709

f l 7 ! 0

f . v'1711-

| 1712

1 l 713

| 1714

f 1715

| . 1716

1717

| 1718

1719

1720

1721

j 1722\ ' ' l 1 723

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03- j ( Edta )

Cu

1

1

2

12

16

16

4

28

2

20

4

16

8

4

2

8

2

2

4

28

3

23

. : l'

25

4.

35

4

5

2

2

11

80

3

12

4

8

6.

Ni

12

6

20

14

22

16

18

24

12

16

14

12

20

12

14

4

12

8

16

20

16

. 20

8

24'28

16

20

4

-20

8

.18

10

20

12,

16.

52

Af)

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5'.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

-5

Zn

10

4

16

44

19

112

14.

186

10

204

10

- 84

20

20

12

18

12

12

10

148

16

126

10

124

. 16

32

16

24

16

12

20

24

14

. 44

32

26

58

Pb

4

4

6

38

8

60

8

92

4

72

4

40

8

12

8

12

4

8

. 4

92 .

12

80

10

64

TO

40

8

.16

.4

8

12

20

6

36

8

16

20

Cu

i ' . ' . . ~j - ' . : '

l'

i . ' ' .

i '-. ;i .

i - t1 , : '

Ni Ag Zn , Pb

.

1

l

Page 107: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TOWNSHIP^

Burrows

(Bu #2, Gp '

-

, :.

: ' . .

;-- .^

- .

.

1

•'".

-

'

-. j' ' i

.

; .

-

Burrows

SAMPLE NO.

1724

1725

1726

1727

1728 .

1729

1730

1731

1732

1733 *

'1734

1735

17361737V '

.1738

1739

1740

1741

1742

i 1743

j 1744

.1745

1746"

1747

1748

1749

(Bu #2 Gp 2| 1750.

1751

1752

f 1753i1754

1755

1756

1757

1758

1759

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu

10

10

8

7

4

4.

. 4

8

12

4

21

.10

6

2]

6

1

11

. 4

V 4

4

16

.10

14

1

24

3

4

8

24

32

8

n10

3

10

4

.Ni

24

32

12

12.

12,

30

. 12

28

40.

24

20

28

12

20

8

8

12

20

12

28

16

36

20

16

24

16

12

52

; 3252

20

40

22

20

14

. 16

Ag

•5

.5

•5

-5

.5

: - 5.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

--•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

• 5

. .5

.5

.5

Zn

88

32••'..44

16

40

16

23

30

60

' 20

203

28

40

16

44.'•19

83

12.

18

18

88

18

45

' 12

76

33

47

60

240

60

68

36

76

15

68

16

Pb

36

8

40

16

12

8

16

14

32

6

68

12

20

6

28

8

36

4

12 -

10

32

12

24

10

64

4'16

16

60

20

36

12

24

8

32

10

\

(Edta)

Cu

' - ;.

•••' , . ;

1

i

Ni

*

,-

- -

AS

, " ' '

Zn .

•C . -

'••••' , '

' '

'Pb

--

.' : " '

- . -

'

.

Page 108: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

i

TOWNSHIP ™ 1 SAMPLE NO.

Burrows 1 1760 '

(Bu #2 Gp 2)* 1761

-. .

'

.

j 1762

.1763

. 1764

1765

\ ;1766

l 1 767

1768

- ' '

'

J

.

1769

/'l 770 '

1771

1772

1773

1774

1775 ,

1776

1777 "- .1778

i 1 779Foleyet, j 1780 .

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HClp4-HN03 - | . , ( Edta)

Cu24

3

1

2

1- 4

2

. 2

5

4

n3

4

2

24

2

6 : '.3'

4

4

16

Ni20

20

;10

20

8

24

10

20

8

24

•' 16

20-. ' 4 :

16

24

.20

8

16

: 628

.10

•Afl

,5

.5

.5

\ . 5

..5

.5'.5

. -5

..5

. .5

: .5.5

.5

•5

.5'.5

.5

.-5

•5

.5

i Z n64

16

12

20

8'16

10.

24

28

20

72

; 18

26

16

19216'

22

25

2518'.

24:

Pb B Cu68

4

8

8-•'' 4

•4

:. 6

8

J 16

8

40

8

, 16

.l 10 '

88

'J 10

.30

8

V16••;. 8

, 6

j;",; .

,

.' -, v

r ... .... -'.i ' " 'i ' ' ' ' " * "! ' ' ".'. '

i

i ' ; .' i .''•".. ; :-:,i ' ' ' ' , : '. '

i - '- ;' -|j--'; : :;;;

Ni

1

Ag 1 Zn .

. ..

"

,-

. Pb '

•, :

, *

•. . ' ;

Page 109: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

i

'.w,,,,-,,., SAMPLE NO,

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P.(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu Ni Ag'Zn

Hg1

Pb II Cu

P.M.

(Edta)Ni' Aq i '2In' Pb

Burrows

(Bu n Gp 2)^

i 1800 ,f1 1 801 ;li

| . 1802

| 1803

•1804.i!t) '

1 805

1806

1807

1808

1809

1810 :

1811

1 1 812

1 1813f1 1 814 -S1 1815

'j 1816

jj 1817

j 18181

1819

j 1820 '

1 1821i 'j 1822

i 1823

j 1824\l 1 825

i 1826

| 1827 :

S 1828t| . - 1829

f 1830. '\ ' m]f-'' " --J

6

6

40

6

7

24

2

4'4

4

12

3

24

4

10

14

32' 4

6'

40

28

8

25

2

8

4

: 5

2

6

1-..

i ' K1 -

h-*.:

1 .

8 .

32

40

12

•44

20

8

16

8

14

14

12

20

24

12,

52

28

1 12

16

80

44

28

32

14

8

20

. .8

16

8

16•"14.

.36

' .5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

1.0

1.0

•1.0

". -5

.5

.5

,5

.' .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

-•5

,5

.5'.5

.5

• 5

.' .5

.5

.5

•;. .5'

35

40

420

48

28

;81

8; 14

12

18

60

8

88

1460 '

22

78

12

56*

32

300

24

260

12

30

12

16.

12.

. 32

16

60

16 .

20

12.'

88

28

12

90

j 4

\ 4

4

: 420

8

68

-12"44.

16

68

8

20

12

84

8-

48.

8

l 6

8

12

8

. 20

10

40 .

B!

1

..•-... ,' .

1 'V:.'-'J5 ' . . '1 '"' ; -" :-i!i

ii j -

i ' 'ii - -'

.'

- .-

.i -lii .

1 ' ' ;i -' ' ''l - ' ,''t , - , *

"i -'l ' '

l'' - -'.

L --

i

- ' : (

j

'•' '' -

i - . , -.~

' - '

1

j

' !

i •; ' i" i

i

i 1

i'- -

Page 110: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

t

i

TOWNSHIP

Burrows

(Bu #2 Gp 2)

Fawcett

(Gp. 1)

SAMPLE NO.

1832

j 1833

1834

1835

1836

1837

1838

1839

1840

1841

1842

1843

1844

1845

1846

1847

1848

1849

1850

1851

j 1852i

1853

1854

1855

1856

1857

1858

\ 1 859i'

i

-

1860

1861

1862

1863

1864

1865

| 1866

i 1867'

l

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f ( Edta)

Cu

16

1

1

4

12

1

42

2

1

1

1

20

32

10

22

8

12

8

14

8

30

16

26

8

12

6

12

4

40

6

8

8

30

12

28

16

Ni

18

14

8

16

. 16

12

32

12

6

20

12

28

28'•'16

20

10

12

28

12

20

28

24

24

16

12

24

12

20

. 44

16

8

24

32

28

32

26

Ag

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

;l.o.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. -5

:- .5

.5

.5

.5

. ,5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

•5

•- .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

. 5

ci ^

Zn52

12

8

12

20

32

870

24

.12.

20

16

32

48

24

62

16

48

24

en28

68

28

76

20

48

20

" 40

26

304

24

34

22

102

- 2 2

52

32

' Pb

76

TOi-12

4

24

8

152

8

8

8

8

S

16•10

26

1 8' 36

6

i 32

6

56

6

64

4

16

12

r 2812

124

12

24

8

70

8

. 48

12

. Cu

i v-j :. .

i \ j .i1 ' .

i

i 1

1 .

!

i . - . '

|. .-...'•,-i. ; . ;i " " . * '

; ' . : . :

t 1 ' .'i ' : - i ' ' -

i

i ' . ,; ,'. ii '

j ; ;

Ni Aq 1 Zn

iPb

.

*

Page 111: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

* f

TOWNSHIP

Fawcett

(Gp. 1)

•; . .

-

^ -

- i••^

'

h

.

SAMPLE NO,

1868

1869 -.

j 1870

1871

1872

1873' - '1874

1875 .

1876.

1877

18781

1879

1880

1881 y.1882

1883

1884

1885

1886 * .

1,887 -.

1888

' 1889

1890-

1891

1892

1893 '

1894

1895[i .| 1896|

1897l)\ 1 898

\ 1 8998r

j 1900 .i

1 1

1 9011

1.902

1903

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03. : f , ( Edta)

Cu

20

28

36

12' 2.4 -

16

ie:8

24

6

22

228

76

42

44

6

24

12

32

12

12

4

16

6

14

4

36

4

20

4

24

8

8

4

32

48

Ni

24

24

32

36

28

36

20

16

28

24

24

44

. 24

. 20

20

24

24

24

36-

28

20

24

20

16

24

16

38

24

.28

20

32

24

8

16

34

20

AB• 5

•5

.5

.'5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5•:'.- 5 '

.5

.5

.5•-.-B-

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

,5'Is

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

,5

: zn.eh42

120

44

118' 84

76

16

140

28

86

540

328"'..36;

64

16

84

28

168

36

80

16

40

24

76

22

72

20

112

36

208

18

. 26

20

388

32

: Pb16

20

88

10

64

28

44,

8

84

12

52;.'.: :'- : 8-

;1612

20

8

72

10

124

10

36; 12

44

12

48

14

72

, 8

.60"12

72

8

.16

8

84

! 12

' Cu

; . . - ; ; : '

t

' -

' .

iii ' . . . 1

'

N1

- ''

. ,

. ' '

Afl

j .

.

Zn .

. -—

.

Pb

.--

. ';

"' ". '

Page 112: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

x f

TOWNSHIP

Fawcett

SAMPLE NO.

1904

(Gp, 1) 1905

1906

.

.

'

1 '

1

1907

1908

1 1909

1910

1 1911 1

1912i

1913

1914

i 1915

1916

1917

1918

1919

1920 ,i - .

1 921

- 1922

1923

1924

1925

1926

1927

1928

1 929

1930

1931

1932'

: l 1933 ' :

' 1 1 934

\ 1 935-

.

•- , .

.*-

, . \

1936

1937

1938*

"1939i | 1940!

i

' ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f ' . ( Edta)

Cu

232

328

800

16

42

10

34

12

48

12

26

16

20

20

24

16

. 32

4

20

8

32

16

40

4

10

8

18

40

46

6

20

12

24

6

38

22

34

Ni

68

44

.46

24

12

30

44

16

60

32

32

24

16

40

20

24

36

24

30

28

36

24

24

12

.16

28

30

28

36

24

20

32

20

12

36

. 20

20

Ag

.5

.5

1.5

. .5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

.5

.5

.5

• 5'..5

.5

.5

• 5

. .5

.5

.5

' .5

.5

.5

. .5

.5

••5

.5

.5

• 5

.5

: . -5.'•'-.5

.5

. .5

. .5

.5

•5

, .5

Zn

590.

32

32

24

40

' 28

144

20

152

48

88

44

88

24

68

' 2 rr

92

20

68

28

124

32

128

16

32

96

124

188

200

52

88

24

84

14

104

20

60

Pb

108

16

:16

8

14

12

88

16

112

12

52

1.2'•44

8

72

12

84

1 12

i 68

12

80

•14

36

8

40

12

34

44

14?

.12.

48

: 12

48

8

132

8

i 32

Cu

' ,.

;. -'. -

- '. ' ' ' '

1 '

i '

li i i

t

ij]is . -.

Ni

' .

^• : '

Ag f Zn .

,

-

Pb

-

-

.

-

Page 113: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

yrTOWNSHIP SAMPLE NO.

Fawcett t 1941li{Gp. 1) 1942

19431j 1944:

- -

' i

ff il \

1 945

1946

1947

1948

1949

1950

. 1 951

1952

1953

1954 '

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1.964

P 1965 '

.

' - ' i

1966

1967

1968,

1969,

! 1970

1971

1972- :

^1973

.1974

1975

1976

1977'

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.(Hot) HC104-HN03

Cu

8

28

8

16

3

8

6

20

4

24

10

18

12

28

24

20

8

16

12

18

26

28

22

16

4

14

8

.16

6

32

8

54

8

42

16

40.

,8

Ni

22

24

26

22

16

12

20

28

20

26

12

16

28

30

28

32

16

18

24

16

28

24

18

20

20

20

26 .

16

-.20.'36.'-

20

56

20

46

16

36

20

A9

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

.5

.5

. .5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

, -5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

..5

•5

'j . 5

•5.

,5

.5

,'- 5.'5

.5

.5

.5

•5

.5

Zn

16

108

30

64

32

68

24

144

36

172

16

60

28

232

28

88

20

28

28

48

48

144

34

58

30

84

40 :

: 92,48

188

46

156

24

144

42

120

30

Pb |10

76

6

44

6

28

12

80

10

60

, 8

44

8

88

12

.144

8

28

8

34

18

60

12

46

12

40

12

66

16

70

12

84

8

116

14

92

12

(Edta)

Cu

. ' -

,-'-v.',

'. /. '•

- ' . ' -''

i ' i ' -i i ' , -;i '. i i '

j :

Ni.

. --

(

^ '

Afl

.

Zn .

f

Pb

'

• '

T

-

l

v

\

^^

Page 114: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

V ' '\\

TOWNSHIP l SAMPLE NO. '.

Fawcett J 1978li

(Gp. 1) \ 1 979f\ 1 980i-

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986l

1987

'-

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

l 1 995

f 1996

\ 1 997j \ 1 998

j 1999

l 2000"ifi 2001

: 1 Z002L. ™.. - .. . fi

— i-wjj^.^ ,, .

ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN P. P. M.

(Hot) HC104-HN03 f (Edta)

Cu

16

16

36

60

32

18

16

6

40

4.

24

4

124

10

30

10

30

4

44

8

28

12

16

16

18

Ni

20

16

34

32

22

24

24

16

40

20

.26

8

28

24

32

16

16

16

38

20

32

32

20

24

28

Ag

.5

,5

.5

,5

•.5

•5

.5

•5

•5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

,5

. .5

Zn

56

40

180

84

168

•44

140

26

212

32

144

28

64

32

116

34

156

36

296

30

180

34

68

28

40

Pb l Cu

30

20

70

14

56

16

28

12

120

.14 -

60

1284 '

. 16

68

12

56

14

108

12

96

8

24

12

26

;

1 ' . i ,

i

1 '

i

i

1

i

J '"' -

i

Ni A9 Zn . .Pb

.*

'

i j

i'-

i1

i

Page 115: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Raymond Twp.-M.244

44404 l 399B7 t 3 9596 ( 4 *424 l Q

Tyrrell Twp.- M.253

C\ls

l CL

oCO

c: o

THE TOWNSHIP OF

KNIGHTDISTRICT OF TIMISKAMING

LARDLR LAKE MINING D IVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH-4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

*C.

NOTES

400* Surface Rights Reservation around all lakes and rivers.

DATE OF ISSUE

r* 2 81972

ONT. DEPT. Of MINES AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS,

PLAN NO- M.228

ONTARIODEPARTMENT OF MINES

AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS

41PI4SEWI56 63.3935 MONO 200

Page 116: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

65

as

20W I6W I2W 8W 4W O 4E 8E I2E I6E 20E Z4E 28E 32E 36E 40E 44E 48E 52E 56E 60E 64E 68E 72E 76E 80E 84E

I6N

TRANSMlTTER STAT l ON

CUTLER MAINE: L32E - 52E INCL.

SEATTLE WASHINGTON^ L 20W - 28E INCL.

L56E - 84E I NCL.

DIP ANGLE' l" : 40 0

CONDUCTOR A XIS'

OPERATOR C BRITT

2N

O

AMAX POTASH LTD.

VLF RADEM DIP ANGLE SURVEY

HALLIDAY TWP. - ANOMALY NO. lTIMMINS

SCALE' l" ^ 400'

NTS NO 41 P/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY W R RYALL TIMMINS

ONTARIO

PROJECT NO 302 ST

DATE AUGUST 16,197.

41PI4SE8656 63.3935 MOND 210 , . 0*3)

Figure 6

Page 117: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

LAKE

8S

20W I6W I2W 8W 4W O 4E SE I2E I6E 20E 24E 28E 32E 36E 40E 44E 48E 52E 56E 60E 64E 68E 72E 76E eoE 84E

2N

O

INSTRUMENT MCPHAR MF-|

SERIAL NO .- 6485

OPERATOR' L. KYDD

BASE STATIONS' t

BASE STATION VALUE' 500 GAMMAS

CONTOUR INTERVAL^ 1000 GAMMAS

100 GAMMAS

4IPI4SE0056 63.3*35 MOND 220

AMAX POTASH LTD.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

HALLIDAY TWP. -ANOMALY NO. lTIMMINS

SCALE' l" ^ 400'

NTS. N O 41 P/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY W.R.RYAL TlWlNS

ONTARIO

PROJECT NO' 302 S T

Figure 7

Page 118: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

LiTfLE MARNE LAKE

INSTRUMENT CRONE LARGE LOOP TRANS,

FREQUENCIES^ HIGH 1800 CPS.

LOW 480 CPS.

TRANSMITTER SET UP ' \

CONDUCTOR AXIS' Q

DIP ANGLE SCALE l" * 40"

OPERATORS' M LAITINEN, L. KYDD

4IPMSEa*S6 63.3835 MOND 330

AMAX POTASH LTD.

CRONE VERTICAL LOOP SURVEY

BURROWS TWP. - GROUP NO 2ANOMALIES 485

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE: -400N.TS NO 41 P/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY W. R RYALL TIMMINS

PROJECT NO 302 ST

Figure 8

Page 119: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

LAKE

NSTRUMENT Me PHAR FLUXGATE MF-

SERIAL NO 6485

MAG. BASE STATION

CONTOUR INTERVAL - 1 00 GAMMAS

OPERATORS M.LAITINEN, L KYOD

41P14SE0e56 63.3035 MOND 2-40

A MAX POTASH LTD

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

BURROWS TWP. - GROUP NO. 2ANOMALIES 485

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE l"-400'NTS NO 41 P/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT B Y W R RYALL T IMMINS

PROJECT NO 302 ST

Figure 9

Page 120: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

o

PIGEON L AKE

TRUE CONDUCTOR

TRANSMITTER STATION- BALBOA PANAMA

DIP ANGLE SCALE -- \" ^ 4 00

CONDUCTOR

OPERATOR M. LAITINEN

A MA X POTASH LTD.

VLF RADEM DIP ANGLE SURVEY

KNIGHT TWP. - ANOMALY NO.I8

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE' 1-400NIT- NO 41 P/10,11

^ Z- ^jrtfTO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY W R.RYALL TIMMINS

PROJECT NO. 302ST

DATE: JULY 10-12/71

41P14SE8BS6 63.3035 MOND 250 Figure 10

Page 121: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

PIGEON LAKE

INSTRUMENT McPHAR FLUXGATE

MAG. BASE STATION

BASE STATION VALUE. 500 GAMMAS

CONTOUR INTERVAL 1000 GAMMAS

200 GAMMAS

OPERATORS' L.KYDD, C. BRITT

AMAX POTASH LTD.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

KNIGHT TWP. - ANOMALY NO. 18TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE -400NTS. NO 41 P/10,1

6?-TO ACCOMPANY R EPORT BY WR.RYAl.i TIMMINS

4IPHSE8656 63.3035 MOND 260

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE' JULY 12-15,1971

Figure 11

Page 122: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

INSTRUMENT: McPHAR FLUXGATE MF-

SERIAL NO.' 6485

MAG. BASE STATION

CONTOUR INTERVAL' 100 GAMMAS

OPERATORS' M. LAITINEN, L.KYDD

41P14SE0056 63.3835 MOND

AMAX POTASH LTD.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

FAWCETT TWP. - GROUP NO. lANOMALY NO. 31

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE -400NTS. NO- 41 P/ll

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BV W R RYALL T IMMINS

PROJECT NO: 302 ST

Figure 13

Page 123: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

TRANSMITTER STATION- CUTLER MAINE

DIP ANGLE SCALE l * 400

CONDUCTOR AXIS'

OPERATOR' L. KYDD

TRAVERSES' M. LAITINEN

AMAX POTASH LTD.

VLF RADEM DIP ANGLE SURVEY

FAWCETT TWP. - GROUP NO. lANOMALY NO. 31

TIMMINS ONTARIO

NTS. NO^

SCALE: 1^ = 400'

63-PROJECT NO- 302 ST

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY' W.R.RYALL TIMMINS DATE - O CT. 1-3, 1971

41P14SE0856 63.3035 MOND aso Figure 12

Page 124: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

20W 12W 28E 36E 44E 52E 60E 68E

LEGEND:

Hot Extraction- HCI04 HN0 3

Soi! Samplers* R.Roussoin, C. Britt, M. Pickens

Date: ju|y 26, 1972

Base L ine

76E

ZINC IN TOPSOIL

HALLIDAY TWP. - ANOMALY No.

OVERLAY No. lScate* l" s 400'

NTS,. No 41 P/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY i

PROJECT 302 ST

AM AX Ltd., Titmiins, Ontario

41P14SE0056 63.3935 MOND 290 Figure 3 a

Page 125: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

20W 12W 28 E 36E 44E 52 E 60E 68E

LEGEND'

Hot Extraction - HC104 HN03

Soil Samplers 1 R. Roussain, C. Britt, M.Pickens

Date; July 26, 1972

M Base Line

76E

COPPER IN TOPSOILHALUDAY TWP. - ANOMALY No.

OVERLAY No. 3Scale: l" s 400'

NTS. No. 41 p/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY'

PROJECT 302 ST

AMAX " Timmins

41PMSEW56 63.3035 MOND 300 Figure 3b

Page 126: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

20W 12W 28 E 36E 44E 52E 60E 68E 76E

LEGEND'

Hot Extraction - HCI04 HN03

Soi l Samplers * R Roussain, C. Britt, M. Pickens

Date* July 26, 1972

Base Line

ZINC IN SUBSOILHALLIDAY TWP. - ANOMALY No.

OVERLAY No. 2Scale' l "s 400'

NTS. No. 4IP/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY;

PROJECT 302 ST

AMAX Potash ^d, Timrn.ns , Ontario ,

41P14SE0956 63.3035 MOND 310 Figure 4a

Page 127: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

20W

L312905

L312906

5i

L312907

L312910

12W 28 E 36 E 44E 52 E 60E 68E

L308798

-n

LEGENDi

Hot Extraction- HCI04 HN03

Soil Samplers* R. Roussain, C. Britt, M. Pickens

Dote* July 26, 1972

Base Line

It "f

76E

COPPER IN SUBSOILHALLIDAY TWP. - ANOMALY No.

OVERLAY No. 4Scale' l" = 400'

NTS. No. 4l P/14

TO aCCOMPANY REPORT BY:

PROJECT 302 ST

AMAX Potash Ltd., Timmins, Ontario

4IP14SEe056 63.3035 MOND 320 Figure 4b

Page 128: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

20W 12W O

L312904

L312911

4E 12E 20E 28E 36E 44E 52 E 60E 68E

L306798

Legend:HOT EXTRACTION- H CIO4 HNO 3

Soil Samplers : R Roussain C B'I". M P c

Date : July 26, 1972

Base Line

76E

LEAD IN TOPSOIL/SUBSOILHALLIDAY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO - ANOMALY No. 1

Overlay No. 5Scale :r*400'

NTS. NO. 4IP/14

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT

NO- 302 ST

AMAX Potaih Ltd., Timmins, Ontario ~" ( ~/

41P14SESH&SS 63.3035 M OND 330 Figure 5

Page 129: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

as

20W 16 W f?W 6W 4 W 4E 8 E l? f" I6t 20E ?4E 36E 40E 44E 48 E. 56E GOE 64 F. 6SE 76E so? 84E

l \

U 2D Diorite

Q 3 G Gabbro

chl Chloritic

graph Graphitic

^jf HI Conglomerate

fH H4 Quartzite and s andstonek Sericitic

(T~) V!D DaciteQ VIR Rhyolite

0 V2A Andesite

H V4 Rhyolite tuff

y Porphyritic

Area of outcrop

Contact assumed

Stream and direction of flow

FO U 1 1

Swamp

Rood

Sample no. and location

DDH

IS

AMAX POTASH LTD.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

HALLIDAY TWP.'ANOMALY NO.TIMMiNS

SCALE

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY DATE'

4IP14SE8856 63.3035 MOND 340Figure 6

Page 130: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Little l/Aarne Lake

L312950

LEGEND'

Hot Extraction - HCIfy HN03

Zn ppm Ooo ^

Soil Samplers* R. Roussoin, C Britt, D. Hawk e

Date' August 4, 1972

ZMC-COPPER IN TOPSOIL

BURROWS TWR,ONTARIO - GROUP No.2

OVERLAY No.2Sco*t'ltt-4OO'

NTS. NO. 4IP/I4

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BYi

AMAX PottNh Ltd., Tim mini, Ont

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE'

41P14SE8856 63.3035 MONO 350 Figure 8

Page 131: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

D

Marne Lake

LEGEND'

Hot Extraction - HCI04 HN03

ppmppm

Soil Samplers' R. Roussain, C. Britt, D. Hawke

Date: August 4, 1972

ZINC-COPPER IN SUBSOIL

BURROWS TWR,ONTARIO - GROUP No.2

OVERLAY ISIo.1l" * 400'

NTS NO. 41 P/14

TO ACCOMRfcNY REPORT BYi—

AMAX Potash Ltd., Tinvnins, Ont

41PMSE0056 63.3035 MONO 360 S? "XS? 3

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE:

Figure 9

Page 132: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Base Line

L312949

Little 'Marne Lake

Legend:HOT EXTRACTION - HCIO4

Soil Samples: R.Roi.sioin . t. fir it t D.Howke

Datet Auqus* 4

LEAD IN TOPSOIL/SUBSOILBURROWS TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO - GROUP No. 2

Overlay No.3Scale :l":400'

NTS.NO. 4IP/U

1O ACCOMPANY REPORT

AMAX Pntoil. l k)., Timi,

PROJECT NO- 302 ST

DATf-

41P14SE0056 63.3035 MOND 370 Figure 10

Page 133: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Little Marne L ake

Q l H Syenite

Q 28 Diabase

Q VIR Rhyofite

[Tj V 2A Andesite

Area of o utcrop

—' — Contact assumed

——— Contact observed

^—*--r Schistosity or f oliation

x6 Sample no. and l ocation

ODH

AMAX POTASH LTD.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BURROWS TWP. - GROUP NQ 2ANOMALIES 485

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE^ l"-400NTS. NO. 41 F/14

TO ACCOMPANY Rt PORT

4IPMSE0*56 63.3035 MOND 380 Figure 11

Page 134: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

CNUJ(N

\

\\

L308816Base L me

\

\

\

LEGEND^

Hot Extinction - HCI04 HN0 3

Soil Samplers' R. Roussoin, C. Britt, D. Hawke

Dote' August 5, 1972

ZINC-COPPER IN TOPSOILFAWCETT TWR, ONTARIO -

OVERLAP No. 2

GROUP No.

NTS. NO. 4IP/II

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY'*—***^

AMAX Potash Ud., Timmins, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE ;

41P14SE*e56 63.3935 MOND 390 Figure 13

Page 135: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

\\\

LEGEND'

Hot Extraction - HCI04 HN03

Soil Samplers* R. Roussain, C. Britt, D. Hawke

Date* August 5, 1972

41PMSE6856 63.3035 MOND -400

ZINC-COPPER M SUBSOILFAWCETT TWR, ONTARIO - GROUP No.

OVERLAY No. lScate l"*400'

NTS. NO. 4IP/II

TO ACCOMRWY REPORT BY:•^*

AMAX Potash Ltd., Hmmin*, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE

Figure 14

Page 136: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

\

CN

\

Legend:HOT EXTRACTION - HCIOd HNO 3

Soil Samplers 1 R.Rousicim. C Bri*t D Hawk e

Date. Angus! 5 . 1972

LEAD IN TOPSOIL/SUBSOILFAWCETT TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

Overlay No.3Scale -.l":400'

GROUP No. l

NTS NO. 41P/II

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BYi*

AMAX Polosh Ud . Tirnmins , Ontario

PROJECT NO- 302 ST

DATE

41P14S60056 63.3935 MOND 410 Figure 15

Page 137: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

00 O

L308817

Jfcr

\

Jt

^ff13 ' -K..X*

v^fi

L308816

Jt

\^nnr 1" lv-,"

It:

Jfe

X.

TOST

306812

•^f

, *^ ' v| .A*.' ; -. ^A

Z6 CniErfl)

-*t

1'^

thl.

//,

'Sf/s eM.k.^m /-

yy/!

rW.-^^"

/s* LI NE

/

L308812

41PMSEW56 63.3935 M OND -4S0

a 2B(3 3G

c

cbl

h

k

D MQ Ml

qv

D V IR V2A

D

x 18

O "O bO 66

Gabbro

Quartz

Chlorite

Horneblertde

Sericitized

Schist

HornfeU

Quartz vein

Rhyolite

Andesite

Rhyolite b reccia

Area of o utcrop

Contact a ssumed

Schist osi ty or foliation

Sample no. and l ocation

DDH

\ f/ * XTi i ^i si

L308813 ^ .S l

v ^ ^r

AMAX POTASH LTD.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

FAWCETT TWP.ANOMALY

1 IMMiNS

SCALE:r::-,, "j c. i! F-/-:

TO ACCJMF-ANY KtPOfc"! Hi" sb-A-^L.

- GROUP NO. INO. 31

ONTARIO"-4UU1

1 h: i| Li NO- .V'', ! '

J0 * ****flL*\^^ Ot-xC^-^ OA I^t"

7 Figure 16

Page 138: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

PIGEON L AKE

LEGEND*

Hot Extraction* HCI04 HN03

Soil Samplers^ R . Roussam, C. Britt, D. Hawke

Date* August 2, 1972

ZINC "COPPER IN TOPSOIL

KNIGHT TWR, ONTARIO - ANOMALY No. 18

OVERLAY No. 2Scot* I N-400'

NTS. NO. 4 1 P/10, II

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT ^—^

AM A X Pot o* h Ltd., Timmins,

PROJECT Na 302 ST

DATE:

41PI4SE0056 63.3035 MONO 430 Figure 18

Page 139: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

"fe\

PIGEON LAKE

41PUSE8856 63.3035 MOND 4-40

LEGEND:

Hot Exlroctiont HCI04 HN03

laCu ppm

Soil Samplers' R. Roussain, C. Britt, D. Howke

Date- August 2, 1972

ZINC -COPPER IN SUBSOIL

KNIGHT TWR, ONTARIO - ANOMALY No. 18

OVERLAY No. l

Sea* l"* 400*

NTS. NO. 4IP/IO.II

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT BY'v.

AMAX Potash Ltd^ T immins, Ont

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

DATE:

Figure 19

Page 140: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

PIGEON LAKE

Legend:HOT EXTRACTION-MOO,, HNO 3

Soil Samplers R.Rousiain, C Britt. D.Hav/ke

Date August 2 1972

LEAD IN TOPSOIL/SUBSOILKNIGHT TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO - ANOMALY No.18

Overlay No.3Scale :l"--400'

NTS NO 41P/1Q. 11

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT

PROJECT NO 302 ST

AMAX Potash Lid . Timmins DATE

41P145ETO56 63.3835 M OND 450 j 7*'J1 2 3 Figure 20

Page 141: AN EXPL PROPOSAL FOR THE SHINING TREE AREA PROP

Pigeon Lake

3H hornblendite

3E Peridotite

3G Gabbro

H l Conglomerate

H2 Arkose

H4 Quartzita

VID Dacite

VIR Rhyolite

V2A Andesite

V2B Basalt

Area of outcrop

-— — Contact assumed

-. .— Contact observed

x 1 8 Sample no. and location

POTASH LTD.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

KNIGHT TWP. - ANOMALY NO. 18

TIMMINS ONTARIO

SCALE: 1=400NTS. W. 4! P/10,

70 A'iCOMPAMY

PROJECT NO. 302 ST

4IPMSEB356 63.3835 MOND 460(S 6'

Figure 21