An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their...
-
Upload
george-ferns -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their...
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
1/71
University of St Andrews
Master of Letters (MLitt) in Marketing
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the least ethical of them all?An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic
Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of Ethics and SocialResponsibility in Business
Name:George Ferns
Matriculation number:100019739
Submission Date:August 31st 2011
Supervisor:Rob Gray
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
2/71
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would firstly like to thank Prof. Rob Gray for supporting me throughout thedissertation process. He challenged my intellect, made me question that which I neverquestioned, and guided me to discover something invaluable - a new worldview.
I would like to thank my significant other for her help, support and love. I would alsolike to thank my family for their unconditional love and always letting me be who I am.
I would like to thank the Irvine Computer Lab Crewfor the stimulating discussions andhelping me cope through the long nights working on my dissertation
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
3/71
DECLARATION
I hereby certify that this dissertation, which is approximately 15000 words by me and
that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. This
project was conducted by me at the University of St Andrews from 05/2011 to 08/2011
towards fulfilment of the requirements of the University of St Andrews for the degree of
MLitt in Marketing under the supervision of Professor Rob Gray
Signature: _______________________________
Date: ___________________________________
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
4/71
ABSTRACT
This study argues that prevalent societal narcissism could be partly responsible for
growing unethical business practice. By exploring the construct of narcissism amongst
students at the University of St Andrews, this study aims to test whether a relationshipexists between narcissism and business ethics and social responsibility. Furthermore,
this study also attempts to uncover whether students are more/less narcissistic and
more/less ethical depending their choice of study. Indeed, findings indicated that a
higher level of narcissism predicts a lower consideration for ethics and social
responsibility. Moreover, students of economics were found to be the most narcissistic
and least concerned with business ethics compared to finance students, finance and
management students and management students.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
5/71
Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... i
Decraration ............................................................................................................................................. ii
Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. iii
1. Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background Information & Problem Description ........................................................................ 1
1.2 Importance of Study ....................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Research Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Outline of method ........................................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Layout of thesis ............................................................................................................................... 5
2. Chapter 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW......................................................................................... 6
2.1 Personality Disorders in Organisations ....................................................................................... 6
2.2 Narcissism ....................................................................................................................................... 8
2.2.1 Narcissism defined .............................................................................................................. 8
2.2.2 Types of narcissism............................................................................................................. 9
2.3 Narcissism in Corporations ......................................................................................................... 12
2.3.1 Narcissistic CEOs and Employees.................................................................................... 12
2.4 Narcissism and Ethics .................................................................................................................. 14
2.4.1 Is narcissism immoral? ...................................................................................................... 14
2.5 Business ethics ............................................................................................................................. 16
2.5.1 Can business ethics be taught? ........................................................................................ 17
2.5.2 Do business schools encourage narcissism? ................................................................... 19
2.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 22
3. Chapter 3 - RESEARCH DESIGN .......................................................................................... 23
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 23
3.1.1 Research Questions.......................................................................................................... 26
3.1.2 Research Strategy............................................................................................................. 27
3.2 Survey tools NPI & PRESOR ..................................................................................................... 28
3.2.1 Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) ............................................................................ 28
3.2.2
Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility (PRESOR) ....................................... 29
3.3 Study Participants ......................................................................................................................... 30
3.3.1 Population and Sample ..................................................................................................... 30
3.3.2 Collection of participants contact details .......................................................................... 31
3.4 Gathering of data .......................................................................................................................... 31
3.4.1 Main data collection........................................................................................................... 31
3.4.2 Trial surveys ...................................................................................................................... 32
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
6/71
3.5 Data Verification ............................................................................................................................ 32
4. Chapter 4 - FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS ...............................................................................34
4.1 Research question 1 .......................................................................................................................36
4.1.1 Which study is the most/least narcissistic? ....................................................................... 36
4.1.2 Who perceives ethics and social responsibility as most important/unimportant? .............36
4.2 Research question 2 .......................................................................................................................37
4.2.1 Males vs. Females............................................................................................................. 37
4.2.2 Individual vs. Collective ..................................................................................................... 38
4.3 Research question 3 .......................................................................................................................39
4.3.1 Economics vs. Finance ..................................................................................................... 39
4.3.2 Economics vs. F&M........................................................................................................... 40
4.3.3 Economics vs. Management ............................................................................................. 41
4.3.4 Finance vs. F&M................................................................................................................ 42
4.3.5 Finance vs. Management .................................................................................................. 43
4.3.6 F&M vs. Management ....................................................................................................... 44
4.4 Research question 4 .......................................................................................................................45
4.4.1 Do students who are more narcissistic perceive business ethics to be less important? ..45
5. Chapter 5 - DISCUSSION .......................................................................................47
5.1 A disturbing relationship..............................................................................................................47
5.2 Economics students NPI and PRESOR scores ..........................................................................47
5.3 Whats the deal with finance?........................................................................................................48
5.4 Low NPI scores?............................................................................................................................49
5.5 Culture and gender differences .....................................................................................................49
5.6 Limitations and Future Research ..................................................................................................50
5.7 Implications......................................................................................................................................51
6. Chapter 6 - CONCULSION .....................................................................................54
7. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 1
References ............................................................................................................................................. iv
Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................................................... v
Appendix 2 ............................................................................................................................................ vi
Appendix 3 ........................................................................................................................................... vii
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
7/71
1
1. Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Information & Problem Description
In his seminal publication, The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith declares: All forourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the
vile maxim of the masters of mankind (Smith, 1776: 448). So, those in the position of
greatest power place utmost consideration on individual need, rather than the needs of
those at their mercy. In times of financial turmoil, ever-prevalent corporate misconduct,
and a society that has seemingly misplaced its moral compass, Smiths adage extends not
only to the masters of mankind but also to the masters of the marketplace. But how has the
self-centred individual become such a predominant, and often successful, factor in society
and business? To find a definitive answer to this question is difficult and ultimately not the
objective of this paper. Rather, this paper will examine possible consequences of allowing
individualism to take the reins of society as explained by Twenge and Campbell (2009: 4):
Its what you have if youre a politician and youve strayed from your wife, and its
why five times as many Americans undergo plastic surgery and cosmetic procedures
today than did just ten years ago. Its the value that parents teach their children with
song lyrics like "I am special. Look at me," the skill teenagers and young adults
obsessively hone on Facebook and MySpace, and the reason high school students
physically beat classmates and then broadcast their violence on YouTube for all to
see. Its the message preached by prosperity gospel and the vacuous ethos spread by
celebrity newsmakers. And its whats making people depressed, lonely, and buried
under piles of debt.
Twenge and Campbell are referring to narcissism or what they consider to be an
epidemic. Narcissism is a natural human inclination; it is a facet of our personalities that
gives us a sense of self and self-preservation. Yet in excess, narcissism can turn ugly,
becoming a pathological disorder or a disturbance in self-identity. Pathological narcissists
are generally viewed as a hindrance to themselves, those with whom they share a
relationship, and the organization for which they work (Maccoby, 2003). Furthermore,
highly narcissistic individuals are apparent in business pathological narcissism is
associated with unethical behaviour, including unethical business practice (Amernic &
Craig 2010). Moreover, pathological narcissists regularly exhibit an overwhelmingly strong
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
8/71
2
desire to attain power, not always used for good (e.g., Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pot, Lenin,
Hussein, Mugabe are all considered pathological narcissists) (Glad, 2002). While normal
narcissism is often regarded as a characteristic necessary to climb the corporate ladder,
pathological narcissists are often particularly successful when it comes to career
development, climbing the corporate ladder through deception, manipulation of others and
a mastery of gaining advantage through corporate politics rather than through honest
means (Maccoby, 2003). When reaching the level of senior management, and especially in
the case of a CEO, pathological narcissists frequently demonstrate high levels of strategic
dynamism that results in inconsistent financial performance, unjustifiably risky decisions
and decreased employee morale (Maccoby, 2003).
Business schools perpetuate the rising trend of pathologically narcissistic managers
by endorsing a lesser form of narcissism in the classroom; namely, self-interest. They do
this by indoctrinating students in Friedmanite philosophy; teaching game theory, agency
theory and transactional cost theory, and focusing almost solely on competition as the
ultimate market mechanism and performance as the only measure of success (Ghoshal,
2003). As a young persons academic career progresses, especially those who studied
finance and economics, research shows a significant drop in the consideration of ethical
responsibility (Wolfe & Fritzsche, 1998). Furthermore, researchers argue that the state of
business education focuses almost exclusively on individual interest, which ultimately
restricts a students frame of reference to shareholder wealth (Ghoshal, 2003). This often
leads to business students losing the capability to develop their moral reasoning skills and
consider ethics as a part of everyday business. Not only is there often a decrease in a
students ethical consideration during their business education career, but also business
students exhibit greater narcissistic tendencies (Westerman et al, 2010; Brown et al, 2010).
Furthermore, research indicates that students in US business schools have never been as
narcissistic as they are today as Westerman et al, (2010) remark that "our future business
leaders appear to be even more self-absorbed and entitled" than ever before. Future
business leaders are effectively primed to only consider themselves evaluating their
impact on the world through performance measurement, ultimately disregarding the effect
their business decisions have on the natural environment and society.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
9/71
3
1.2 Importance of Study
There are two principle reasons for conducting research on narcissism and business
ethics amongst students. First, there is growing concern about the ethical conduct of
business, born from examples of well-known scandals involving companies such as Enron,Tyco International, and WorldCom. For example, in their 2009 Fraud Survey, KPMG, the
international audit, tax and advisory firm, conclude that corporate fraud remains a serious
and growing trend. Out of the 5000 employees surveyed, nearly half indicate that they
witnessed corporate misconduct that would cause significant loss of public trust if
discovered (KPMG, 2009: 3). Furthermore, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
(ACFE) estimates that corporate fraud results in a 5% loss of revenue, which equates to a
staggering $2.9 trillion as a percentage of global GDP (ACFE, 2010). The ACFE also indicates
that owners and executives who commit corporate fraud present the greatest burden to a
company, costing an average of $723,000 per person. It is therefore important to identify
trends associated with such behaviours, since the negative impact of their decisions is
significant.
Secondly, the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is becoming a
widespread aspect of business which, to a certain extent, shares a relationship with ethical
business conduct. The IBM Global CEO Study, which includes 1130 CEOs from 40 countries,
indicates that CEOs have increased spending on social and environmental initiatives by
25% from 2008 to 2009 (IBM, 2009). Furthermore, market analytic firm Verdantix
reported that CSR-related spending activities by firms with annual revenue of over $1
billion will increase from $28 billion in 2010 to $60 billion in 2014 (Verdantix, 2010). CSR
is thus an important aspect of business considering current and future investment, but how
do the personalities of business people effect decisions related to CSR? Furthermore,
because the motivations behind CSR investment are sometimes encountered with
scepticism (Bakan, 2004, Friedman 2001, Levit, 1998) we need to better assess how the
personality of an individual affects their capability to make ethical decisions. Though
business ethics has been researched from many aspects, there is little research regarding
the relationship between narcissists and their perceptions of ethics. This study will build
on previous research aiming to examine this relationship.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
10/71
4
1.3 Research Objectives
This study will test the relationship between narcissism and business ethics, using
student subjects. Students are a useful demographic as research suggests that business
schools are perpetuating the rise in narcissism by indoctrinating students with teachings
that emphasise the need for self-interested thinking (Ghoshal, 2003). This in turn becomes
a self-fulfilling prophecy, as students study material which is, by nature, focused on self-
interested thinking, and as a result, they themselves may become self-interested and
ultimately narcissistic. The main objective is to therefore discover whether an empirical
relationship exists between students level of narcissism and their perception of ethics and
social responsibility. Furthermore, this study also aims to determine which business-
related study programme contains students with the highest/lowest levels of narcissism
and business ethics. Overall, the results of this study should provide a conclusion as to
whether narcissism and ethics/social responsibly share any relationship and also whether
there is a difference in narcissism and business ethics amongst different study
programmes.
1.4 Outline of method
Two main methods of research will be used to answer the above-mentionedquestions. Firstly, secondary research, in terms of academic journals, business literature
and newspaper articles, will be used to create a literature review. Secondly, primary
research will be used to gather data on narcissism and business ethics, using two well-
validated surveys: the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) (see appendix 1) and the
Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility Survey (PRESOR) (see appendix 2). The
NPI, comprised of 40 forced-answer questions, provides a score indicating narcissistic
tendencies. The second survey focuses on business ethics and includes 16 questions that
test a persons view on whether or not a firm should focus solely on profit maximization or
shift its efforts to benefit society and the environment. Respondents answer the PRESOR
based on a 9-point Likert scale. The surveys were combined to create one survey that was
sent (via an online survey distribution service) to 240 students, 133 of which responded.
These were all students of the University of St Andrews including Management (MLitt),
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
11/71
5
International Business (MLitt), Finance and Management (MLitt), Finance (MSc),
International Strategy and Economics (MSc), Money, Banking and Finance(MSc).
1.5 Layout of thesis
This study will begin by discussing relevant literature, which will entail an
exploration of both narcissism and business ethics. Firstly, a broad overview will examine
personality disorders in organizations, then switching focus to understand the concept of
the corporate psychopath. Next, narcissism is discussed in order to differentiate between
healthy and psychopathic narcissism, and to examine the effect narcissism has on an
organization, lastly detailing ethical implications of narcissism. Next the literature review
will investigate ethics, particularly business ethics in education. This will include an
attempt to answer the question of whether ethics should be, and can be, taught in higher
education. Lastly, the literature review will discuss the consequences of studying business
and economics related subjects, analysing whether students of business and economics
related subjects are more self-interested/narcissistic than other students. Following the
literature review, the research design will firstly present a theoretical framework that was
deduced from the literature, followed by introducing specific research questions.
Thereafter, the research strategy, in terms of quantitative and qualitative techniques, is
discussed. Next, the surveys (NPI and PRESOR) that will be used to attempt to answer the
research questions will be introduced and discussed. After the surveys have been discussed
the research design will focus on the study participants in terms of their composition and
selection. Lastly, the validity of the research design will be discussed. The research design
chapter is followed by presenting the findings. This chapter is structured in terms of the
research questions. Each question is answered individually. Thereafter the findings are
commented upon in the discussion chapter. This chapter is composed on themes that were
drawn from the findings chapter. Lastly, a conclusion is presented that summarizes thefindings and provides final remarks.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
12/71
6
2. Chapter 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW
Whoever loves becomes humble. Those who love have, so to speak, pawned a part of theirnarcissism
Sigmund Freud
2.1 Personality Disorders in Organisations
Psychologists often argue that the selfis defined in terms of our personality (Judge et
al, 2002). Our personality affects our actions and helps others form an opinion of us - both
in a social setting and in a business context. Certainly, people have different personality
types that evolve throughout their life, which can be categorized into traits such as
openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (McCrae and
Costa, 1985). Depending on the context in which a person finds him/herself, different
personality characteristics play a more/less effective role in decision making and
behaviour. Yet in some cases, an individuals personality can take a turn for the worst and
develop into a disorder (i.e. paranoia, antisocialism, narcissism, schizophrenia, borderline
personality disorder, psychopathy and obsessive-compulsive disorder). This often arises
when there is an extreme imbalance between several personality traits or when one
personality trait has an excessive dominance over other traits (Lee, Ogunfowora & Ashton,
2005). But what occurs when a disturbed person is in the business environment?
Although research on personality disorders within business environments often
examines various disorders from different academic perspectives, there is one increasingly
widespread construct used in a business context the notion of Corporate Psychopaths
(Hare, 2004; Babiak, 1995; Boddy 2010; 2005) or those people working in corporations
who are self-serving, opportunistic, ego-centric, ruthless and shameless but who can be
charming, manipulative and ambitious (Boddy, 2005: 30). These are people who exhibit a
combination of disorders, namely: psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism (Boddy,2010). Although actual psychopaths account for approximately 1% of the general
population, corporate psychopaths represent approximately 5% of the business world,
(Hare, 2004) particularly within the finance, insurance, banking and communication
industries (Boddy, 2010). These crazy business people are not just a hindrance to the
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
13/71
7
financial success of corporations, but are damaging to overall performance - including the
welfare of stakeholders (Goldman, 2006). Some even hypothesise that the collapse of
several US corporations may have been the result of senior managers exhibiting signs of
psychopathy (Hercz, 2001).
One serious concern amongst researchers is the lack in moral reasoning of corporate
psychopaths. For example, McCormick and Burch (2005) indicate that these corporate
psychopaths are significantly more prone to fabricate their performance figures and
commit fraud, amongst other white-collar crimes. Weiss (2008) adds that the majority of
rogue-traders (financial market traders who make unauthorised trades) such as Nick
Leeson who was responsible for the loss of 872 million and the consequential collapse of
Barings Bank (Tremewan, 1995) are highly narcissistic in their thinking and display
distinct signs of corporate psychopathy. Moreover, Bobby (2010) concluded that there is a
strong negative correlation between psychopathy and corporate social responsibility
(CSR). In other words, the more psychotic a corporate psychopath is found to be, the more
resistant he/she will be towards CSR. It could be argued that corporate psychopaths resist
CSR not only because of their psychopathic tendencies, but also because of their drive to
generate profits instead of investing money in ethical practices. Yet what motivates a
corporate psychopath?
Corporate psychopaths aspire to attain high-responsibility positions within large
organizations because of their desire to access the power, influence, prestige, and money
associated with these corporate positions (Boddy et al, 2010: 3). Although corporate
psychopaths attempt to manipulate their co-workers into admiring them, Boddy (2006)
argues that this is only a portrayal of a superficial leadership image which will always
remain a faade. Moreover, corporate psychopaths use their charisma to attain promotions
and are ruthless to opposition when climbing the corporate ladder. They achieve this by
using their charm to fool and manipulate people through corporate politics (Deutschman,
2005). Maibom (2005) argues that corporate psychopaths are able to excel at their jobs
given a focus on getting promoted and, because they lack any conscience, emotional
distance from colleagues.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
14/71
8
All in all, there are certain individuals working for corporations who suffer from
personality disorders and are generally seen as a burden to the company. Yet corporate
psychopaths are of a special breed because they exhibit a mixture of three personality
disorders (psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism) that all have the prevailing
element ofself-interest. Without remorse, empathy and a conscience they are addicted to
promotions, salary increases and power. They manipulate their colleagues and the
corporate system to portray themselves as leaders and the model employee. One of the
three personality disorders found in a corporate psychopath narcissism is seen as
predominant factor that distinguishes the corporate psychopath from its counterparts
(Boddy et al, 2010). Particularly disturbing is that narcissistic tendencies not only lend to
the manifestation of a corporate psychopath but also are increasingly present in even
normal business people; this will be the focus of the section.
2.2 Narcissism
2.2.1 Narcissism defined
Narcissism is a concept brought to light by Sigmund Freud (1914), metaphorically
described by the Greek myth of Narcissus who falls in love with himself by staring at his
own reflection in a pool of water. Not being able to stop staring at his own beautiful image,Narcissus starves and is turned into a white flower (Amernic & Craig, 2010). This myth has
resulted in narcissists to be generally understood as people who have an overwhelming,
and sometimes obsessive, love for themselves. Freud (1914), one of the most influential
contributors to the study of narcissism, thought of narcissism as an essential part of human
development and something that is evident from birth. Freud (1914) recognized that
narcissism can be a positive personality trait, notably self-preservation, yet also
acknowledged the destructive capacities of extreme narcissism. To identify an all-
encompassing definition of narcissism is difficult due to the lack of consensus amongst
researchers and the varying forms of narcissism. The American Psychiatric Association
(APA) defines narcissism as a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, self-focus, and self-
importance exhibited in individuals (Morf & Rhodewalt, 2001: 177). Campbell, et al (2010)
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
15/71
9
attempt to further clarify the concept of narcissism by arguing that it can be divided into
three components:
(1) The self: The narcissistic self is defined by positivity, specialness and
uniqueness, vanity, a sense of entitlement and a desire for power andesteem (Campbell et al, 2010: 2).
(2) Interpersonal relationships: The relationships of a narcissist are
comprised of low levels of empathy and emotional intimacy (Campbell et al,
2010: 2).
(3) Self-regulatory strategies: The self-regulatory strategies refer to the
tendency of a narcissist to seek out opportunities for attention and
admiration, brag, steal credit from others, and play games in relationship
(Campbell et al, 2010: 2).
Narcissism has been widely studied in the context of social science. Researchers
have, for example, found men to be more narcissistic than women (Foster, Campbell &
Twenge, 2003), apparently because of womens tendency to develop an interdependent
self-construal compared to men who develop an independent image of themselves (Cross
and Madson, 1997). Furthermore, research found collectivist cultures to be less narcissistic
than individualistic cultures (Foster, Campbell & Twenge, 2003) since individualistic
cultures are more focused on individual self-enhancement whereas collectivist cultures are
relatively conductive of self-criticism (Kitayama et al, 1997). While the three afore-
mentioned components provide an overarching framework for a general description of
narcissism in the context of social science, it is a more complex construct that requires
further description. Importantly, one has to separate healthy narcissism from pathological
narcissism.
2.2.2 Types of narcissism
Although narcissism often has a negative connotation, behavioural psychologists do
tend to distinguish healthy narcissism from pathological narcissism (Brown, 1997). For
example, Freud (1914) argues that narcissism is a naturally occurring personality
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
16/71
10
phenomenon that should not necessarily be considered destructive. Healthy narcissism
refers to individuals who generally portray ambition, confidence, and high self-esteem
(Maccoby, 2000) that helps them cope with daily frustrations, and [gives them] a capacity
for introspection and empathy (Amernic & Craig, 2010: 84). Healthy narcissism has also
been called constructive (Kets de Vries, 1994), reparative (Glad, 2002) or productive
(Maccoby, 2003) as it often lends to personal and professional development. Furthermore,
Dickinson and Pincus (2003: 366) argue that healthy narcissism is a normal expression of
narcissism (and) may contribute to self-esteem by increasing an individuals sense of
personal agency which leads to individuals being ambitious, satisfied, and relatively
successful. For healthy narcissists, failing to achieve goals, receiving disapproval from
others and failing to attain the success of others, could lead to disappointment, but rarely
depression (Lubit, 2003). We humans all use narcissistic tendencies to protect our self-
image from being attacked by others; for example by believing that we are in some way
more special than someone else (Maccoby, 2000). Furthermore, it is often assumed that a
healthy dose of narcissism is necessary to build self-confidence, which enables us to deal
with frustrations (i.e., I am still a worthy person, although Bob got the promotion) and
defend our own personal values (i.e., I disagree with Bob because I believe that I am right).
Many also argue that healthy narcissists usually do not feel the necessity to excessively
indulge in fantasies of grandiosity as they have enough self-confidence, adaptability, and
humour to stress real achievements (Kets de Vries & Miller, 1985: 593). All in all, he althy
narcissism, even in small doses, is something that is apparent in most people. It is a part of
everyday life and a necessary defence mechanism to protect our self-image and boost our
self-esteem.
Pathological narcissism, or the dark side of narcissism, differs from healthy
narcissist because individuals exhibit destructive personalities in several cases exhibiting
signs of psychopathy, as symptoms include manipulative tendencies, a desire for
entitlement, and a lack of empathy (Maccoby, 2000). Pathological narcissists are also
known as destructive (Lubit 2002), reactive (Kets de Vries, 1994), unhealthy (Stolorow,
1975) and non-productive (Maccoby, 2003). Pathological narcissists frequently display a
fragile self-esteem that needs protection, which they attain by constructing a grandiose
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
17/71
11
image of themselves (Lubit, 2002). They often demonstrate highly egocentric behaviour,
which they defend by requiring others to constantly express admiration towards their self-
created and regularly exaggerated self-image (Campbell et al, 2004). These narcissists
generally suffer from a serious personality disorder that inhibits them from forming
meaningful (versus superficial) relationships. Pathological narcissists often enter
adulthood with a legacy of feelings of deprivation, insecurity, and inadequacy, (Kets de
Vries, 2004: 189) as their upbringing may have lacked self-esteem development (Lubit,
2004). The American Psychiatric Association (APA) created the most widely used
characterisation of narcissism as a pathological disorder. According to the APA, a narcissist:
(1) Has a grandiose sense of self-importance; (2) Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited
success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love; (3) Believes that he or she is "special" and
unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-
status people (or institutions); (4) Requires excessive admiration; (5) Has a sense of
entitlement; (6) Is interpersonally exploitative; (7) Lacks empathy: is unwilling to
recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others; (8) Is often envious of others or
believes others are envious of him or her; (9) Shows arrogant, haughty behaviours or
attitudes (American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
Although there is a clear distinction between healthy and pathological narcissism in
the literature, these to concepts are not always irreconcilable. On the premise that
personality can develop over time, Miller, et al (2007) argue that although healthy
narcissism can help an individuals self-confidence and career aspirations, it may progress
into a pathological form of narcissism or even to the more extreme corporate psychopath.
The evolution from healthy to pathological narcissism often occurs because healthy
narcissists easily turn pathological when they are overcome with feelings of grandiosity
and paranoia (Campbell et al, 2010). Interestingly, Hogan and Kaiser (2005) observe that
healthy narcissism can develop into pathological narcissism throughout the progression of
ones career. In other words, the more an individual is paid, the higher their position, the
more responsibility they have, the more narcissistic they become. Therefore, CEOs may
often be most narcissistic (Kets de Vries & Miller 1984). Moreover, Hogan and Kaiser
(2005) found that individuals who are highly narcissistic are more likely exhibit signs of
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
18/71
12
pathological narcissism compared to those who are not highly narcissistic. Moreover, some
researchers disagree with the notion that healthy narcissism is actually healthy. Twenge &
Campbell (2009) argue that narcissism, even as a normal part of humans is in part
responsible for the demise of American society a view is also expressed by Stern (1979),
Lasch (1991) and Caldwell (2006). Twenge & Campbell (2009) further argue that because
Americans are raised in a society that explicitly encourages self-admiration, competition
and materialism, narcissism is actively promoted. This has dramatic consequences; for
example, the mortgage meltdown that led to the financial crisis of 2008 was caused, in
part, by the narcissistic over-confidence of homebuyers (Twenge & Campbell, 2009: 2).
Lasch (1979) would concur as he argues that narcissism is actually the psychological
consequence of capitalism in its bureaucratic form and that it results in a superficial,
materialistic society.
2.3 Narcissism in Corporations
2.3.1 Narcissistic CEOs and Employees
Top managers make decisions like any other person based on a mix between
rational thinking and personal interpretation (Child, 1972). Considering the power held by
top management, it would surely be disconcerting to discover that many CEOs havedamaging psychological disorders influencing their decision-making skills, especially
disorders of self-interest such as pathological narcissism or even corporate psychopathy.
Research conducted by Kets de Vries (1984) examining narcissists and leadership indicates
that narcissists are frequently encountered in top management positions. Indeed it is only
to be expected that many narcissistic people, with their need for power, prestige, glamour,
eventually end up seeking leadership positions. Their sense of drama, their ability to
manipulate others, their knack for establishing quick, superficial relationships serve them
as well (Kets de Vries & Miller 1984: 32). The CEO position thus often attracts narcissists.
Hayward and Hambrick (1997: 766) concur, adding: CEO hubris and personal ambitions
are potent influences on executive action and, by extension, organizational outcomes.
Research done on the personality traits of CEOs by Judge et al (2003) concluded that
extraversion, which is narcissistic personality trait, was the most common personality trait
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
19/71
13
of CEOs. Interestingly, Maccoby (2000) argues that narcissistic personality traits played a
paramount role in the career development of many CEOs including Bill Gates, Andy Grove,
Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, and Jack Welch.
Although narcissistic personality traits may suit a CEO, what is the effect of having apathological narcissist as the head of a corporation? Pathological narcissists, similar to
corporate psychopaths discussed in section 2.1, can be very destructive towards a
corporation. Firstly, there is evidence of pathological narcissism being partly responsible
for unethical behaviour within business. This is especially the case in accounting scandals
such as Enron/WorldCom, as well as the majority of white-collar crimes, is often a result of
narcissistic individuals (Blickle et al, 2006). Secondly, people who work for pathologically
narcissistic CEOs suffer under the CEOs leadership. For example, CEOs and managers
displaying signs of pathological narcissism may expect great dedication from others and
may overwork them without regard for the impact on their lives (APA, 2004:14). Lastly,
there are several studies that hint at volatile performance of companies that are run by
narcissistic CEOs. Ketz de Vries concurs, stating: the real disease of many executives, CEOs
in particular, is narcissism (Dearlove, 2003: 26). Furthermore, Campbell & Campbe ll
(2009) argue that narcissistic leaders, specifically CEOs, cannot properly sustain an
effective leadership position within a corporation since narcissists have a tendency to take
uncalculated risks and have destructive interpersonal relations with co-workers.
Chatterjee & Hambrick (2007: 351) agrees by indicating that narcissism in CEOs is
positively related to the strategic dynamism and grandiosity, as well as the number and
size of acquisitions, and it engenders extreme and fluctuating organizational performance.
Soyer, Rovenpor and Kopelman (1999) found similar results: though they cannot find any
conclusive results in terms of poor financial performance, they have identified extreme
fluctuations in financial performance. In other words, narcissistic leaders in a corporation
can be ineffective in achieving sustained growth over longer periods of time due to their
erratic behaviour and risk-welcoming mindset. Yet there are many situations in which
narcissistic leadership can prove effective for corporations and society. Firstly, a
narcissistic leader can be seen as beneficial in times of crisis or turbulence as the narcissist
is able to cope with extreme pressure due to their detachment from emotion, dynamic
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
20/71
14
thinking and aspiration for short-term results which stems from their need for instant
gratification (Rosenthal & Pittinsky, 2006). Secondly, in times of despair or economic
depression narcissistic leaders are in high demand due to their charismatic personality and
visionary thinking, which makes them an instiller of hope, a role that is in many respects
essential to the effective mobilization of people facing adversity (Ouimet, 2010: 720).
Though most research regarding pathological narcissism has focused on top
management, its impact on mid-level managers and general employees has also been
examined. A form of pathological narcissism the corporate psychopath that was
previously discussed demonstrates that individuals of all organizational levels could
potentially be Snakes in Suits (Babiak, & Hare, 2006). The consensus is similar to the
findings of pathological narcissism and leadership research; that pathological narcissists
can have a negative effect on several aspects of business, no matter their position. This is,
for example, observed when pathological narcissists alienate subordinates as a result of
their devaluation of others, insist on having their own way, have a lack of empathy, and are
willinng to exploit others (Lubit, 2002, p. 130). Pathological narcissists at all levels also
have the tendancy to overevaluate their own performance, engage in unethical practices,
and exhibit in a volatile behaviour (Duchon & Drake, 2008). Amernic and Craig (2010: 80)
concur, adding that pathological narcissists engage in creative accounting; and inflate
reported financial results to boost their ego and self-esteem. The pathological narcissist
endeavour into unethical practices without regarding the moral nature of their
wrongdoings occurs because they become self-obsessed and use a sense of entitlement,
self-aggrandizement, denial, and rationalizations to justify anything they do (Duchon &
Drake, 2008: 301).
2.4 Narcissism and Ethics
2.4.1 Is narcissism immoral?
Although narcissists can be highly successful when it comes to career development,
their own self-enhancement, or when confronted with crisis or economic despair, the
question of how, or the means by which narcissists operate, raises several ethical
considerations. Given that pathological narcissists generally lack the emotional intelligence
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
21/71
15
found in normal people which allows them to understand, accept and act upon social and
moral norms, it is difficult to imagine a destructive narcissist having a moral compass
(Maibom, 2005). Scottish philosopher David Hume may concur, arguing that emotion,
rather than reasoning, is at the center of any moral decision and therefore: "Reason is, and
ought only to be the slave of emotions" (Hume, 1740/2003:215). In other words, humans
use reason to control or tame their emotions and therefore to make ethical decisions.
Consequentially, without emotion there can be no moral reasoning and ultimately no
capability to feel for others or empathize. In all, pathological narcissists generally lack
emotion and therefore have difficulty making ethical judgments.
Yet the argument is not so simple. One could argue that the unethical actions of a
narcissist are not because the narcissist is acting as the moral agent, rather because he or
she is primed or conditioned by his or her environment to act in a certain way. This view is
shared by Weber (1968) and Bauman (1989) who argue that modern bureaucracy leads to
the separation of the individual from morality because in a bureaucracy the performance
of each individual worker is mathematically measured, each man becomes a little cog in the
machine and aware of this, his one preoccupation is whether he can become a larger cog
(Weber, 1968: 998). This is well illustrated through the example of Jerome Kerviel, the
rogue trader who lost $7.2 billion (the largest fraudulent loss ever recorded in the financial
sector) by making unauthorized risk-seeking trades whilst working for the French bank
Socit Gnrale (Weiss, 2008). Kerviel insisted that he should not have been blamed for
his actions because this behavior was common practice at Socit Gnrale and that the
banks corporate culture was focused solely on making money regardless of ethics (Weiss,
2008) something that Kerviel argues was implicitly praised at the bank. In other words,
Kerviel, a textbook case of a pathological narcissist, claims that he had no moral
considerations whilst conducting his fraudulent activities at Socit Gnrale since he is a
victim of the bureaucratic system that acted as a moral sleeping pill (Bauman, 1989: 26).
Though one could make a case for the silencing of morality (Bauman 1989: 29)
given bureaucratic influences, this does not mean that the actions of, for example Jerome
Kerviel, are ethically justified a case similar to Nazi officers who were part of a
bureaucratic system and thus also detached from their moral compass. There are several
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
22/71
16
other reasons that support the argument that pathological narcissism within business can
result in immoral actions, other than white-collar crime. Firstly, the manipulative nature of
pathological narcissists who satisfy the fantasies of their followers although they appear
to direct their followers towards transcendental purposes, but in fact tend to cater to the
self-delusionary interests of their followers (Bass and Steidlmeier, 1999: 190) can have
unethical implications. Secondly, pathological narcissists tend to disregard the common
good and could potentially pose as a harmful threat to those around them and the
organization for which they work. Lastly, Bass and Steidlmeier (1999) argue that
pathological narcissists potentially lack morality because: (1) pathological narcissists
rarely intend for their actions to be noble, (2) for the pathological narcissist, the ends
almost always justify the means and (3) the consequences, both good and bad, of a
pathological narcissists actions are not fairly distributed amongst those affected. What a
narcissist may consider right and wrong, good or bad, is a very complex path to navigate
and ultimately not the purpose of this paper. Yet one could assume that breaking the law,
disregard for collective humanity and the harmful manipulation of others, which are often
due to a pathological narcissists self-aggrandizement agenda, is ultimately immoral.
2.5 Business ethics
If you ask what is the good of education in general, the answer is easy: that education makesgood men and that good men act nobly
PLATO
During the past century there has been an ever increasing sense of uncertainty
regarding the ethics of corporations. Etzioni (in Gellerman, 1986) concludes that two thirds
of Fortune 500 companies engage in criminal behaviour. Furthermore, cases such GMs
exploding Ford Pinto, the fall of Enron/WorldCom, and white-collar crime (most recently
Bernard Madoff and Jerome Kerviel) have triggered increased concern regarding the lack of
ethics in business. Furthermore, a considerable amount of emphasis has been placed on the
moral judgements made by banking professionals regarding the financial crisis of 2008/09.
Unfortunately, unethical behaviours of these corporations and occasional unethical nature
of business people diminish the confidence that government, society and shareholders
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
23/71
17
have in business practice (Wood and Callaghan, 2003). Kenneth Andrews, professor of
business strategy at Harvard Business School, states if it's black and white, and a man has
normal courage and security, he'll say no. It's the grey areas that the businessman may
more likely flounder (in Tsalikis and Fritzsche, 1989). But although ethics is on the
decline, Bakan (2005:1) argues thata corporations legally defined mandate is to pursue,
relentlessly and without exception, its own selfinterest, regardless of the often harmful
consequences it might cause to others. Regardless of this legal mandate, consumer
scepticism, anti-corporation demonstrations and shareholder activism related to the
decline in corporate ethical conduct have all increased in recent years (LeClair et al, 2000).
The concern for business ethics has sparked demand for business schools to incorporate
ethical teachings within curricula (LeClair et al, 2000). Ghoshal (2003) even argues that
business schools poor ethical training is responsible for corporate misconduct, a view
shared by Schwartz, Kassem & Ludwig who assert: Business schools recognize and reward
students for their grades and faculty members for their research and publications to the
exclusion of their respective socially responsible behaviours, they make it impractical for
students and faculty members to let their social concerns direct their energies (1991:
468). Weber (1990) and Phillips (2004) found current implementation of ethics courses in
business schools to be quite ineffective. Moreover, after a comprehensive review of
business school in the US, Porter and McKibbin (1988) found that there was a significant
lack in the emphasis placed on the external environment of organizations. So, how
important is it to ethically educate business students? Moreover, just how effective is
ethical education?
2.5.1 Can business ethics be taught?
To address the question of whether ethics should be taught and the effectiveness of
such teachings at university level is multidimensional and complex. There are twoopposing schools of thought when considering business ethics as a taught subject, to be
further discussed below. On the one hand, proponents of ethics in business schools, making
up the majority, argue that one can be educated to become more ethical and that schools
need to ethically train future managers to better prepare them for imminent ethical
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
24/71
18
decisions. On the other hand, some argue that business ethics cannot be taught because
students have matured in terms of moral development upon entering university and
further claim that academic institutions are not responsible for ethical upbringing.
When considering the pro-ethics education school of thought, there is evidence that
points to an ever-increasing number of business schools, both in the United States and
Europe, offering ethics courses; though taught with varying degrees of intensity, of course
(LeClair et al, 2000). Although ethics is on the rise in business schools, Baetz and Sharp
(2004: 53) note that when considering the 25 most prominent business textbooks in the
United States, one finds very superficial coverage of ethical issues. But are ethics cou rses
beneficial? Several researchers have found signs of moral development in students after
taking a course in ethics. A meta-analysis study conducted by Weber (1990) concluded thattaking an ethics course improved students ability to make ethical judgements. Weber
(1990) did though warn that the positive effects of ethics courses were short-lived,
implying that continuous ethical education may be beneficial, perhaps even in the business
environment. Another meta-analytic study that included 25 studies on ethics in education
indicated that taking a course in business ethics did in fact improve students ethical
awareness, but to an imperceptible degree (Waples, et al, 2009). Moreover, considerable
research has been conducted understanding how an individuals moral development
progresses over time. Academics generally agree that individuals progress through stages
of moral development, a theory accredited Kohlberg (1976). Kohlberg (1976) argues that
people develop their cognitive abilities to evaluate what they believe is moral and/or
immoral over time which can be explained through six distinctive steps namely:
- Pre-conventional Morality(1) Obedience and Punishment Orientation(2) Individualism and Exchange
- Conventional Morality(3) Good Interpersonal Relationships(4) Maintaining the Social Order
- Post-conventional Morality(5) Social Contract and Individual Rights(6) Universal Principles
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
25/71
19
Shenkir (1990) agrees, noting that, depending on age and level of education,
students exhibit different periods in their cognitive moral development. Each stage denotes
the level of an individuals moral reasoning; importantly, the immediate environment,
including an individuals education, may affect the progress of these stages (Kohlberg,
1976). Some postulate that business students can be trained in ethics at various points of
Kohlbergs stages (Davis & Welton, 1991), but Wood et al (1988) assert that a lack of
ethical training has led to a stagnation of moral development: business students cannot
reason beyond Kohlbergs Maintaining the Social Orderstage, indicating a serious lack of
awareness of, or commitment to, fundamental moral principles (1988: 251). However,
some argue that an individuals ethical perspective has already been developed by the age
of entering college, meaning that an ethics class would not be useful (Cragg, 1997). Hosmer
(1988: 14) further asserts that the moral standards of students have already been set by
their families, their schools, their churches, their peers, and their jobs by the time they
reach a program. Berleson and Steiniers (1964) research indicates that a persons
understanding of what is wrong and right is almost completely established by the age of 16.
This view is often contested: although an individuals fundamental value system might be
developed, it has often been observed that people do tend to change their moral
perspective over time due to a change in national laws or a corporate code of conduct
(Rockness & Rockness, 2010). While it is the prerogative of business schools to teach profit
maximization, given the capitalistic society in which we live, the apparent degradation of
morals in business settings may demand a reconsideration of ethical training in an
education setting; though this may be difficult give the environment at hand.
2.5.2 Do business schools encourage narcissism?
Currently, there are no longitudinal studies, of which I am aware, that confirm an
increase in narcissism during a business students academic career. But overall, businessstudents differ from other students in terms of their personality and ethics. Research, for
example, suggests that business students are generally more narcissistic than non-business
students (Arlow, 1991; Cadsby & Maynes, 1998; McCabe, Dukerich & Dutton, 1991;
Westerman et al, 2010; Zopiatis & Krambia-Kapardis, 2008). Self-interest, a fundamental
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
26/71
20
component of narcissism, is also more apparent amongst business and economics students.
Academic evidence also suggests a decline in ethical development of students prior to
beginning an economics degree compared to the completion of said degree (Wolfe &
Fritzsche, 1998).
Therefore, because business students are generally considered more unethical,
narcissistic, self-interested and, in studying of business, become more self-interested and
less ethical, one can understand that they think more with their head than their heart
(Ruhe et al, 1998: 116). Ferraro et al (2005) highlights the self-fulfilling prophecy inherent
in the study of economics: students that may tend toward self-interest become increasingly
so given the content of what economics students are taught, namely driven by profit
maximisation. Schwartz (1997: 21) concurs by referring to economics students studying
transactional cost theory, agency theory and game theory: when people act on the basis of
ideology, they inadvertently arrange the very conditions that bring reality into
correspondence with the ideology. In other words, because the first principle of
Economics is that every agent is actuated only by self-interest (Sen, 1977:317) students of
economics are primed to accordingly act out of self-interest. Some academics see the
current business school paradigm as disturbing; Brennan (1994: 39) argues that if we go
on hammering into our students the mistaken notion that rationality is identical with self-
interest we shall make our agency models come true at the cost of producing a society that
will not function. Ghoshol (2005) shares a similar view and furthermore argues that
because business schools propagate ideologically inspired amoral theories, business
schools have actively freed their students from any sense of moral responsibility.
So, students studying business-related subjects are inherently more self-interested,
a trait perpetuated by the very subject they study. Marwell and Ames (1981) found that
students of economics would donate less to a public good if it does not benefit them.
Similar results were found by Carter and Irons (1991) who conclude that finance majors
exhibit more selfish behaviour and consequentially keep resources to themselves
compared to their counterparts. Evidence also shows that economics students become
more self-interested over time; for example, Frank et al (1993) demonstrate that self-
interest in students taking a class in economic game theory increase over a semester
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
27/71
21
compared to students who studied economic development in Maoist China. Although
business/economics students are usually contrasted to non-business/economics students,
research has also looked at differences between business-related subjects. Brown, et al,
(2010) for example, found students of finance to be the most narcissistic, compared to
accounting and marketing students. Similar findings were shared by Sautter et al (2008)
who found finance students to be the most narcissistic and least empathetic compared to
students of management, accounting and marketing. And it is not just that business
students are more self-interested/narcissistic, but that they also are also less ethical than
non-business students. Frank and Schulze (2000) find that students of economics exhibit
what is arguably corrupt behaviour when provided with an ethical dilemma, compared to
those taking non-economics courses. Additionally, both Wood, et al, (1988) and Harris
(1989) found that when presented with an ethical evaluation survey, business students had
lower scores than non-business students. So, should universities adjust their focus to
emphasise business ethics? It would be difficult to assume that teaching ethics in a business
or economics course would be effective considering the conditioning of students both due
to the ruthless nature of our competitive economy and the focus on outcomes (Ritter,
2006: 154) and consequentially the nature of business academia.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
28/71
22
2.6 Conclusion
Although all humans have narcissistic tendencies, some are more narcissistic than
others. But narcissism can develop into a personality disorder that often results in
excessive love for ones self and a general disregard for others , typically a result of a
fragile sense of self-esteem. Recently, narcissism has permeated the business world,
where, especially in the case of senior management, it can manifest itself in a damaging
way. In some severe cases, a narcissist can turn from being slightly arrogant, ambitious and
self-confidant into a pathological narcissist or even a corporate psychopath who is
manipulative, controlling and power seeking. Consequently, one of the greatest concerns is
the ethical implications of narcissism in business. With business education placing such an
emphasis on self-interested thinking as a requisite for academic development, businessschools are reinforcing self-interested behaviour and ultimately, narcissism. These two
premises provide a platform for further exploration: the variables of business ethics and
narcissism will be tested in this paper, with the goal of uncovering a correlation between
the two to discover whether high narcissism truly results in a lesser emphasis on ethics.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
29/71
23
3. Chapter 3 - RESEARCH DESIGN
3.1 Introduction
The following findings, deducted from the literature review, will be used to establishresearch questions:
Author(s) Participants Findings Category
Westerman et al (2010)Business students and
psychology
(1)Business students are
more narcissistic than
psychology students
Narcissism/
self-interest
Brown et al (2010)
Students of finance,
accounting andmarketing
Students of Finance
were the most
narcissistic and least
empathetic, followed by
accounting and
marketing
Narcissism/
ethics
Blickle et al (2006) Managers
Narcissistic managers
are less ethical than non
narcissists
Narcissism/
ethics
Frank, Gilovich & Regan
(1993)
Economics and non-
economics students
(1) Economics students
are more self-interested
than non-economics
students
(2) Economics training
inhibits cooperation and
furthers self-interested
behaviour
Narcissism/
self-interest
Marwell & Ames (1981)
Economics students
and several groups
from the general
population
Economics students
were most likely to
adopt a free rider
position regarding giving
to a public good.
Narcissism/
self-interest
Cadsby and Maynes (1998)
Economics students,
business students and
nurses
Economics students and
business students are
more selfish than nurses
Narcissism/
self-interest
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
30/71
24
Author(s) Participants Findings Category
Carter and Irons (1997)
Economics students
and non-economics
students
Economics students are
more self-interested
than non-economics
students
Narcissism/
self-interest
Sautter et al (2008)
Students of Finance,
Management,
Accounting,
Marketing
Finance are the most
narcissistic and the least
empathetic
Narcissism/
self-interest
Arlow (1991)Business and non-
business students
Business students are
more ethical than non-
business students
Ethics and social
responsibility
McCabe, Dukerich &
Dutton (1991)
Students of business
and students of law
Business students are
less ethical than
students of law
Ethics and social
responsibility
Zopiatis and Krambia-
Kapardis (2007)
Business and non-
business students
Business students are
less ethical than non-
business students
Ethics and social
responsibility
Foster, Campbell and
Twenge (2003)
Individual cultures
and collective cultures
(1)Individualistic
cultures are more
narcissistic than
collective cultures
(2)Men are more
narcissistic than women
Culture
Gender
As such, I seek to test these theories to find a relationship between the following variables:
Narcissism
Score of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) (See Appendix 1): although
some studies have focused on narcissism as a construct, other studies, especially those
which have focused on economics students, used self-interest as a dependant variable.
Although the concepts of narcissism and self-interest are not the same thing, per se, strong
correlations have been found between narcissism and self-interest. It would therefore be
useful to further build on previous work done on self-interest by using narcissism as an
extension of self-interest.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
31/71
25
Ethics
Score of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility survey (PRESOR)
(See Appendix 2). Ethics is hard to measure. There are two quantitative scales commonly
used to evaluate ethics PRESOR and ATBEQ (Attitudes Towards Business Ethics
Questionnaire). This study will use PRESOR since its focus is on the contrast between
profit maximization and social responsibility. A respondent therefore must to choose
between whether a company should focus on profits or should disregard profits for ethics.
Type of study programme
When researchers conduct empirical studies on narcissism and business ethics with
students, they usually compare groups of students according to what subject they are
studying, categorising students in three main ways. First, some compare students from
business-related subjects with students from non-business subjects: e.g., finance students
compared to non-finance students, economics students compared to non-economics
students and management students compared to non-management students. The non
category of students typically includes students of several other study programmes.
Secondly, some researchers compare a single study programme (i.e. economics) with a
control group, which is normally a non-business related study (i.e. psychology). Thirdly,
some researchers divide students into general groups which consist of multiple business
related subjects. For example, a category may be titled business students which includesundergraduate students from management, finance, accounting, and MBA students.
Because there are such dispersed ways in which researchers categorize students, especially
those researchers who create groups with multiple studies incorporated in one group, it is
difficult to generalize their research design and consequentially compare findings since
different academic institutions and different study programmes are not always constructed
similarly.
This study will compare individual business-related subjects, with the aim of
providing new insights regarding differences in narcissism and ethics between business-
related subjects rather than comparing business and non-business related subjects. This
lends to discovering differences in business-related subjects rather than illuminating an
already established difference between business and non-business students. Although this
study will not exactly replicate previous work, it will build on research by Brown et al
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
32/71
26
(2010) and Sautter et al (2008) who also looked at individual business related subjects in
terms of narcissism and ethics (although it should be mentioned that by Brown et al (2010)
and Sautter et al (2008) used empathyto denote ethics; i.e. those who lack empathy lack
morals). The following business related subjects will be individually compared: Economics,
Finance, Finance and Management, Management
3.1.1 Research Questions
Considering the theoretical framework deducted from the literature the following six
research questions can be established:
Research Question 1
a. Students from which type of study are the most/least narcissistic?
b. Who perceives ethics and social responsibility as most important/unimportant?
Research Question 2
a. Who is the most/least narcissistic and who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play
the most/least important role - males or females?
b. Who is the most/least narcissistic and who perceives ethics and social responsibility to playthe most/least important role - collective or individual cultures?
Research Question 3
a. Who is the most/least narcissistic and who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play
the most/least important role - Economics or Finance Students?
b. Who is the most/least narcissistic and who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play
the most/least important role - Economics or F&M students?
c. Who is the most/least narcissistic who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play the
most/least important role - Economics or management students?
d. Who is the most/least narcissistic who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play the
most/least important role - Finance or F&M students?
e. Who is the most/least narcissistic who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play the
most/least important role - F&M or Management Students?
f. Who is the most/least narcissistic who perceives ethics and social responsibility to play themost/least important role - Management or Finance Students?
Research Question 4
a. Are students who are more narcissistic perceiving business ethics to be less important?
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
33/71
27
3.1.2 Research Strategy
The reason for choosing one research strategy over another is not because they
produce more valuable result, per se, but it rather depends on the research questions at
hand (Jankowicz, 2005). The main difference between quantitative and qualitative istherefore not a matter of quality but of procedure and therefore, on a basic level,
quantitative methods employ measurement and qualitative methods do not (Ghauri and
Grnhaug, 2005: 109). There are six main reasons why quantitative methods, compared to
qualitative methods, will be utilized for this study (drawn predominately from Bryman &
Bell, 2010).
1. A quantitative approach will be most helpful in addressing the research questions
since variables (narcissism, ethics,studyprogramme, gender and culture) measured
in this research will be precisely identified, isolated and separated, (ultimately
compared with each other) and numerical analyses used to deduce relationships.
2. Given that this study is testing pre-existing theory, a deductive approach will be
adopted.
3. This type of research will lean more toward a positivist epistemology that
embraces any approach which applies scientific method to human affairs conceived
as belonging to a natural order (Jonker & Pennink, 2009:153) compared to an
interpretivist perspective that seeks to understand meaning in social situations.
4. I will try to remain separated from the actual research and therefore perceive
reality as external and objective, rather being involved and thus creating my own
subjective view of reality.
5. I will attempt to gain a large sample, lending to the generalizability of the results.
One main drawback associated with the use of a quantitative paradigm for this
research is that it only identifies relationships between variables, so does not provide any
new understandings in terms ofwhythe relationships exist. Using a quantitative approach
will therefore be unable to provide a detailed narrative to explain the results of this study.
Moreover, a quantitative research approach will restrict respondents, as they will be
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
34/71
28
limited to the variables of the questionnaire. In other words, I can attempt to find a
relationship between narcissism and ethics but not understand why a narcissist perceives
business ethics as being important or unimportant (Ulin, Robinson & Tolley, 2005).
3.2 Survey tools NPI & PRESOR
3.2.1 Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI)
The NPI, developed by Raskin and Hall (1979), is currently the most widely used
measure of narcissism as Cain et al (2008: 643) argue: since 1985, the NPI was used as the
main or only measure of narcissistic traits in approximately 77% of social/personality
research on narcissism. Originally based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM-III) (APA, 1980), the NPI is a self-administered survey that
measures narcissism as a personality trait in non-clinical populations. The DSM-III, on the
other hand measures narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). There is ample controversy
amongst researchers in terms of the applicability of the NPI as a measure of NPD
considering the emphasis place by the NPI on healthy narcissism traits (i.e. self-esteem and
interpersonal dominance) compared to the pathological focus of the DSM (i.e. grandiose
fantasies and lack of empathy) (Cain et al, 2008). Although the direct relationship between
the NPI and NPD is not agreed upon, and although the NPI was not designed for clinicalusage per se, meta-analysis by Miller, et al, (2009: 482) concluded that they are
significantly correlated and generate similar personality profiles.
The original NPI consisted of 54 items that have been rigorously tested for validity
by, for example, finding negative correlations with empathy, a trait rarely possessed by
narcissists (Detwiler & Byravan, 1994). Most notably, Emmons (1984) found substantial
consistence reliability based on four correlated factors: Exploitativeness/Entitlement,
Leadership/Authority, Superiority/Arrogance and Self-absorption/Self-admiration. Raskinand Terry (1988), based on the research by Emmons (1984), improved the NPI and
reduced it to 40 questions, which was again proven to valid in terms of its seven new
factors: Authority, Exhibitionism, Superiority, Entitlement, Exploitativeness, Self-
sufficiency, and Vanity (Kansi, 2003). This seven-factor version most commonly used today.
Each of the 40 questions contains two statements which the respondent is forced to answer
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
35/71
29
(i.e. People always seem to recognize my authority / Being an authority doesn't mean that
much to me; I hope I am going to be successful / I am going to be a great person).
Narcissists generally score above 20 points on the NPI whereas non-narcissist score below
14 points (Rhodewalt & Eddings, 2002). As a comparative benchmark, the average NPI
score a MBA student is 17.4, the average American scores a 15.4 and celebrities have an
average NPI score of 17.84 (Young and Pinsky, 2006).
3.2.2 Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility (PRESOR)
The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility survey (PRESOR), developed
by Singhapakdi et al (1995), is based on the Organizational Effectiveness Menu (OEM)
created by Kraft and Jauch (1992). The PRESOR survey has been widely used by
researchers (e.g., Etheredge, 1999; Valentine & Fleischman 2008; Vitell & Ramos Hidalgo,
2006) to evaluate participants perception of ethics and the role of social responsibility in
business. Participants are required to evaluate the extent to which they agree or disagree
with the statements based on a 9 point Likert scale ranging from very strongly agree to very
strongly disagree. The PRESOR contains 16 statements that link ethics and social
responsibility to a firms overall effectiveness (survival, profit and competitiveness). These
16 statements are further broken down into three distinct factors. In the first section, good
ethics is good business, describes the relationship ethics has with social responsibility and
compares this relationship with long term gains. If a person scores high in this section, it
signifies that they tend to think that ethics and social responsibility are important to the
long-term success of a business. The next dimension, profits are not paramount, adheres
to the belief that there is more to business than just profits. A person who scores high in
this dimension simply believes that a business has other responsibilities besides solely
profit. The last dimension called quality and communication examines the importance
participants place on output qualityand communication compared to social responsibility.Overall the PRESOR is a widely used measure of a persons perspective towards business
ethics. There are although two main shortcomings to the PRESOR. First, because the survey
was created in 1995, and because businesses have seen major developments in terms of
business ethics over the past decade (e.g., CSR), it may be considered relatively out-dated.
-
7/28/2019 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Narcissistic Tendencies of Students and Their Perception of
36/71
30
Secondly, the PRESOR survey is sometimes ambiguous in nature because terms such as
social responsibility and quality output can be interpreted in several ways
3.3 Study Participants
3.3.1 Population and Sample
Participants of this study are postgraduate students from the University of St
Andrews in Scotland, United Kingdom. More specifically, students from the following
postgraduate programmes were selected (the titles in bold represent a collection of
programmes that are combined due to their overlapping subject nature and to make data
processing more efficient)
Management(Management+ International Business)
Finance and Management (F&M)
Economics (International Strategy and Economics)
Finance (Money Banking and Finance + International Finance + Finance)
Students from Management, Management and Finance and International Business
attain a Masters of Letters (MLitt) upon graduation and study at the School of Management
compared to students from International Strategy and Economics, International Finance,
Finance, Money Banking and Finance who receive a Masters of Science (MSc) upongraduation and study at the School of Finance and Economics. Additionally, the School of
Management focuses more on the practical implementation of theory compared to the
School of Economics and Finance, which has a less practical focus (School of Management,
2011). The following table provides an overview of the population size and sample size:
ManagementFinance &
ManagementEconomics Finance TOTAL
Total # students 123 65 23 105 316
Students reached 39 34 18 42 133
Respon