An automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization

25
An automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization The Rice Inversion Project

description

An automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization. The Rice Inversion Project. Objective. Simultaneous optimization for velocity and image Shot-record wave-equation migration. Theory. Nonlinear Local Optimization Objective function - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of An automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization

An automatic wave equation migration velocity analysis by

differential semblance optimization

The Rice Inversion Project

Objective

• Simultaneous optimization for velocity and image

• Shot-record wave-equation migration.

Theory

• Nonlinear Local Optimization

– Objective function

– Gradient of the objective function

• Remark: – Objective function requires to be smooth .

– Differential semblance objective function is smooth.

Differential semblance criteria

offset image

z

x

z z

angle image

h

h

Objective function

I : offset domain image

c : velocity

h : offset parameter

P : differential semblance operator

|| ||: L2 norm

M : set of smooth velocity functions

Gradient calculation

derivative cross correlate*

cross correlate reference field

cross correlate

R0S0

image

DS* DR*

gradient

down down

up up

S*z R*

z

Downward continuation and upward continuationDefinitions:

SZ RZ

Gradient smoothing using spline evaluation

Vimage I

gimage

migration

differential migration*

spline

spline*

Vmodel

gmodel

M : set of smooth velocity functions

Optimization

• Objective function evaluation

• Gradient calculation

BFGS algorithm for nonlinear iteration

• Update search direction

loop

cout Iout

Synthetic Examples

• Flat reflector, constant velocity

• Marmousi data set

Experiment of flat reflector at constant velocity

x

z Ccorrect = 2km/sec

Initial iterate:

Image (v0 = 1.8km/sec)

Image space: 401 by 80

Model space: 4 by 4

Offset image Angle image

Offset image Angle image

Iteration 5:

Image

Iterations

v5: Output velocity at

iteration 5

vbest - v5

Marmousi data set

Marmousi data set

V

Offset image Angle image

Initial iterate:

Image (v0=1.8km/sec)

Image space: 921 by 60

Model space: 6 by 6

Iterate 5:

Image

Offset image Angle image

v5: output velocity at iteration 5

vbest: best spline interpolated velocity

v5 - vbest

iterations

Low velocity lense + constant velocity background

Vbackground = 2 km/sec

Shot gathers far away from the low velocity lense

Shot gathers near the low velocity lense

Seismogram

Iteration 1

Iteration 2

Iteration 3

Iteration 4

Start with v0 = 2km/sec

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

• Offset domain DSO is a good substitute for angle domain DSO.

• Image domain gradient needs to be properly smoothed. • DSO is sensitive to the quality of the image.

• Differential semblance optimization by wave equation migration is promising.

Conclusions