An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

59
An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013

Transcript of An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Page 1: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

An Apologetic for Apologetics

An Apologetic for Apologetics

Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013

Page 2: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Introduction:Introduction:Christianity is Under AttackChristianity is Under Attack

By Cults, Critics, and CultureBy Cults, Critics, and Culture

Page 3: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Attack by CultsAttack by Cults

74 killed74 killed

914 dead914 dead

All Deny EssentialEssential Doctrines of the Faith

Page 4: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Attacked by CriticsAttacked by Critics

Jesus Eaten by DogsJesus Eaten by Dogs Jesus Eaten by DogsJesus Eaten by Dogs

82 % of Gospels False 82 % of Gospels False

Jesus was not GodJesus was not God Jesus was not GodJesus was not God

No ResurrectionNo Resurrection No ResurrectionNo Resurrection

16 % Doubtful16 % Doubtful 16 % Doubtful16 % Doubtful

Page 5: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Attacked by the CultureAttacked by the Culture

All Deny Fundamentals of the FaithAll Deny Fundamentals of the Faith

Page 6: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineApologetics:Apologetics:I. What is It?I. What is It?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

III. Answering Objections to It?III. Answering Objections to It?

IV. Why We Need It?IV. Why We Need It?

Page 7: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutline

I.I. What is Apologetics?What is Apologetics?

A. Apologetics DefinedA. Apologetics Defined

B. Apologetics DescribedB. Apologetics Described

Page 8: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineI.I. What is Apologetics?What is Apologetics? A. Apologetics DefinedA. Apologetics Defined ““Set apart the Lord God in your Set apart the Lord God in your

hearts and be ready always to hearts and be ready always to give a reasongive a reason (Gk. apologia) for (Gk. apologia) for the hope that is in you with the hope that is in you with meekness and fear”meekness and fear” (1 Peter 3:15). (1 Peter 3:15).

Apologetics is giving a reason or Apologetics is giving a reason or defense for our Christian Faith.defense for our Christian Faith.

Page 9: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineI.I. What is Apologetics?What is Apologetics?

A. Apologetics DefinedA. Apologetics Defined

B. Apologetics DescribedB. Apologetics Described

Page 10: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

1. It is Giving a Reason for our Hope1. It is Giving a Reason for our Hope

1 Peter 3:15—“Always being prepared to…[give] a reason for the hope that is in you.”

1 Peter 3:15—“Always being prepared to…[give] a reason for the hope that is in you.”

Page 11: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

2. It is Defending the Gospel2. It is Defending the Gospel

Philippians 1:7—“I am put here for the defense of the Gospel.”

Philippians 1:7—“I am put here for the defense of the Gospel.”

Page 12: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

3. It is Answering Every Question3. It is Answering Every Question

Colossians 4:6—“Let your speech be always gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.”

Colossians 4:6—“Let your speech be always gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.”

Page 13: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

4. It is Contending for the Faith4. It is Contending for the Faith

Jude 3--“I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.”

Jude 3--“I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.”

Page 14: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

5. It is Reasoning with Unbelievers5. It is Reasoning with Unbelievers

Acts 17:16—“So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews… [and] some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him.”

Acts 17:16—“So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews… [and] some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him.”

Page 15: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

6. It is Pre-Evangelism6. It is Pre-EvangelismWe cannot effectively evangelize until We cannot effectively evangelize until

we first we first prepre-evangelize.-evangelize.

There cannot be: There cannot be: … …the Son of the Son of GodGod, , … …the Word of the Word of GodGod, , … …miraculous acts of miraculous acts of GodGod, , … …and salvation of and salvation of GodGod——

unless there is aunless there is a God!God!

Page 16: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

How Much of the World is Non-Theistic?How Much of the World is Non-Theistic?

Almost Half of it!Almost Half of it!

Page 17: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineI. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

I. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

Page 18: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?II. What is its Role in Evangelism?A.A. Its Pre-evangelistic role—Its Pre-evangelistic role—convincing non- convincing non-

Christians to accept the Faith.Christians to accept the Faith. ““He He reasonedreasoned with them from the Scriptures … with them from the Scriptures …

explaining and explaining and provingproving that it was necessary for that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead…and the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead…and some of them were some of them were persuaded persuaded and joined Paul and and joined Paul and Silas….”Silas….”

B.B. Its Post-evangelistic role—Its Post-evangelistic role—confirm Christians in confirm Christians in the Faith.the Faith.

““It seemed good to me…to write an orderly account It seemed good to me…to write an orderly account for you…that you may have for you…that you may have certaintycertainty concerning concerning the things you have been taught”the things you have been taught” (Lk. 1:4). (Lk. 1:4).

Page 19: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Apologetics Helps Pre-EvangelismApologetics Helps Pre-Evangelism “ “This past Sunday a first year college student visited This past Sunday a first year college student visited

our Sunday morning service and spoke to me our Sunday morning service and spoke to me afterwards. afterwards. He said, “I am an atheist.” A few years He said, “I am an atheist.” A few years ago that statement would have left me scrambling for ago that statement would have left me scrambling for a way to reach him.a way to reach him. However, the materials I have However, the materials I have received from you have been a great help. received from you have been a great help. With the With the Lord’s help I was able to answer his arguments and in Lord’s help I was able to answer his arguments and in the end he really had no reason to deny God’s the end he really had no reason to deny God’s existence, he just didn’t want God to control his life.existence, he just didn’t want God to control his life. At the end of our discussion he was standing in the At the end of our discussion he was standing in the back of our building with tears in his eyes. He hasn’t back of our building with tears in his eyes. He hasn’t yet received Christ, but he is now left without reasons yet received Christ, but he is now left without reasons to deny that God exists.” (Pastor Jones 11/18/05)to deny that God exists.” (Pastor Jones 11/18/05)

Page 20: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

It Brings Assurance to BelieversIt Brings Assurance to Believers “ “My son is dying of cancer and for months all My son is dying of cancer and for months all

I could think of wasI could think of was ‘What if there really isn’t a ‘What if there really isn’t a God?’ ‘What if there isn’t a heaven?’ ‘What if God?’ ‘What if there isn’t a heaven?’ ‘What if my son just disappears?’my son just disappears?’ ‘Why is my Christian ‘Why is my Christian religion correct and others incorrect?’…. religion correct and others incorrect?’…. Thank Thank you so much for this book you wrote…. It you so much for this book you wrote…. It answered all my questions for me.answered all my questions for me.…… I am now I am now able to pick up my Bible and read it and find able to pick up my Bible and read it and find comfort in the words during this very difficult comfort in the words during this very difficult time of my son dying from cancer. I can pray time of my son dying from cancer. I can pray to God and feel assured that my son will soon to God and feel assured that my son will soon be in His hands.”be in His hands.” (Nancy Dickens 8/2/05) (Nancy Dickens 8/2/05)

Page 21: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The Pattern of PaulThe Pattern of PaulHe started where they were:He started where they were:Acts 14 (to Heathen)—Acts 14 (to Heathen)—NatureNatureActs 17a (to Jews)—Acts 17a (to Jews)—Old TestamentOld TestamentActs 17b (to Greeks)—Acts 17b (to Greeks)—ReasonReasonActs 20 (to Christians)—Acts 20 (to Christians)—Jesus’ Words Jesus’ Words And took them where they needed to goAnd took them where they needed to go

Page 22: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The Pattern of PaulThe Pattern of PaulHe started where they were:He started where they were:Acts 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 14 (to Heathen)—Nature ““He [God] did not leave himself without He [God] did not leave himself without

witness for he did good by giving you rains witness for he did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying satisfying your hearts with food and gladness” (v. 17).your hearts with food and gladness” (v. 17).

“ “For His invisible attributes, namely For His invisible attributes, namely his his eternal power and divine nature, have been eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been the world, in the things that have been made.made. So they are without excuse” So they are without excuse” (Rom. (Rom. 1:19-20).1:19-20).

Page 23: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The Pattern of PaulThe Pattern of PaulHe started where they were:He started where they were:Acts 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 17a (to Jews)--ScriptureActs 17a (to Jews)--Scripture ““And And Paul…reasoned with them Paul…reasoned with them

from the Scriptures, explaining and from the Scriptures, explaining and provingproving that it was necessary for that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead…”the dead…” (Acts 17:3). (Acts 17:3).

Page 24: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The Pattern of PaulThe Pattern of PaulHe started where they were:He started where they were:Acts 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 17a (to Jews)--ScriptureActs 17a (to Jews)--ScriptureActs 17b (to Greeks)—ReasonActs 17b (to Greeks)—Reason ““As As even some of your own poets have even some of your own poets have

said, ‘For we are all his offspring.’ said, ‘For we are all his offspring.’ Being Being then God’s offspring, we ought not to then God’s offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man”art and imagination of man” (v. 29). (v. 29).

Page 25: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The Pattern of PaulThe Pattern of PaulHe started where they were:He started where they were:Acts 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 14 (to Heathen)—NatureActs 17a (to Jews)--ScriptureActs 17a (to Jews)--ScriptureActs 17b (to Greeks)—ReasonActs 17b (to Greeks)—ReasonActs 20 (To Christians)—Jesus’ WordsActs 20 (To Christians)—Jesus’ Words ““He sent to Ephesus and called the He sent to Ephesus and called the

elders of the church [and spoke of] the elders of the church [and spoke of] the ministry ministry I received from the Lord Jesus I received from the Lord Jesus [who said] ‘It is more blessed to give [who said] ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive’”than to receive’” (vs. 24, 35). (vs. 24, 35).

Page 26: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineI. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

III. Answering Objections to It?

I. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

III. Answering Objections to It?

Page 27: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

III. Answering Some ObjectionsIII. Answering Some ObjectionsObjection 1:Objection 1: Only the Holy Spirit can save, not Only the Holy Spirit can save, not

apologetics?apologetics?Response:Response: True, but He can use evidence to True, but He can use evidence to

convince them to be saved.convince them to be saved.1. Almost no one believes because he thinks it 1. Almost no one believes because he thinks it

is irrational and without evidence.is irrational and without evidence.2. Almost everyone who believes is convinced 2. Almost everyone who believes is convinced

that it is the most reasonable thing for him that it is the most reasonable thing for him to do.to do.

Note:Note: Apologetics can lead the horse to the Apologetics can lead the horse to the water, but only the Holy Spirit can persuade water, but only the Holy Spirit can persuade him to drink it!him to drink it!

Page 28: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Objection 2: The Bible is like a lion. It does not need to be defended. It only needs to be let loose.

Objection 2: The Bible is like a lion. It does not need to be defended. It only needs to be let loose.

Response:Response: 1) What if a Muslim said this 1) What if a Muslim said this about theabout the Qur’anQur’an or a Mormon about the or a Mormon about the Book of Book of Mormon?Mormon? Would we accept it, or Would we accept it, or would we ask for evidence?would we ask for evidence?

2) We only fear lions because we have prior 2) We only fear lions because we have prior evidence that they are dangerous. evidence that they are dangerous.

3) Also, we need evidence that what looks 3) Also, we need evidence that what looks like a lion is really a lion and is not like a lion is really a lion and is not someone just dressed up like a lion. someone just dressed up like a lion.

Page 29: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Objection 3: Paul tried apologetics on Mars Hill (Acts 17) but failed. He later turned to preaching

Jesus only (1 Cor. 2:2).

Objection 3: Paul tried apologetics on Mars Hill (Acts 17) but failed. He later turned to preaching

Jesus only (1 Cor. 2:2). Response: This is not true because: 1) He had good results for “Some men joined him and believed,

among whom also were Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman named Damaris and others with them” (Acts 17:34).

2) He had the same results here as elsewhere: some mocked, some believed, and some wanted to hear more (v. 32).

3) He did preach Jesus and his resurrection here (vs. 31-32). He just pre-evangelized them first.

4) He did not use a different method in Corinth. He gave them the strongest evidence for the resurrection anywhere (1 Cor. 15).

Page 30: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Objection 4: Paul said the natural man does not even understand spiritual things, let alone be convinced by arguments (1 Cor. 2:14).

Objection 4: Paul said the natural man does not even understand spiritual things, let alone be convinced by arguments (1 Cor. 2:14).Response:Response: 1) We are saved by faith alone, but the faith 1) We are saved by faith alone, but the faith

that saves us is that saves us is not an unreasonable faithnot an unreasonable faith (like trusting in an airplane with a broken (like trusting in an airplane with a broken wing). wing).

2) Rational persons have evidence 2) Rational persons have evidence thatthat God God exists before they believe exists before they believe inin God. God.

3)3) Evidence Evidence bears on bears on belief belief thatthat (the mind), but (the mind), but only the only the Holy SpiritHoly Spirit can bring someone to can bring someone to believe believe inin Christ Christ (the will). (the will).

Page 31: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Objection 5: We are saved by faith alone (Eph. 2:8-9), not by faith plus reason.

Objection 5: We are saved by faith alone (Eph. 2:8-9), not by faith plus reason.Response:Response: 1) Yes, we are saved by faith alone, but the faith 1) Yes, we are saved by faith alone, but the faith

that saves us is that saves us is not an unreasonable faithnot an unreasonable faith (like (like trusting in an airplane with a broken wing). trusting in an airplane with a broken wing).

2) Rational persons have evidence 2) Rational persons have evidence thatthat God God exists before they believe exists before they believe inin God. God.

3)3) Evidence Evidence bears on bears on belief belief thatthat (the mind), but (the mind), but only the only the Holy SpiritHoly Spirit can bring someone to can bring someone to believe believe inin Christ Christ (the will). (the will).

Page 32: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Objection 6: No one is saved by using apologetics but by preaching Christ (Rom. 1:16).Objection 6: No one is saved by using apologetics but by preaching Christ (Rom. 1:16).Response:Response: 1) It is not either one or the other; 1) It is not either one or the other; it is both.it is both.2) Christ is the only way to God, but 2) Christ is the only way to God, but apologetics is one way to apologetics is one way to

help bring people to Christ. help bring people to Christ. 3) It is unreasonable to believe that the 3) It is unreasonable to believe that the God of reasonGod of reason, who , who

created created people with reasonpeople with reason, , would bypass reasonwould bypass reason to reach to reach people for Christ.people for Christ.

4) God wants to reach the heart, but 4) God wants to reach the heart, but he does not bypass the he does not bypass the head on the way to the hearthead on the way to the heart. He said, . He said,

““Come now let us Come now let us reasonreason…” (Isa. 1:18).…” (Isa. 1:18). ““Give aGive a reason reason for your hope…” (1 Pet. 3:15). for your hope…” (1 Pet. 3:15). “ “Love the Lord with all your…Love the Lord with all your…mindmind”(Mt. 22:37). ”(Mt. 22:37).

Page 33: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineI. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

III. Answering Objections to It?

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?

I. What is Apologetics?

II. What is its Role in Evangelism?

III. Answering Objections to It?

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?

Page 34: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?

A. The Bible commands it

1. Give a reason for your hope (1 Peter 3:15)

2. Defend the Gospel (Phil. 1:17)

3. Answer every question (Col. 4:6)

4. Contend for the Faith (Jude 3)

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?

A. The Bible commands it

1. Give a reason for your hope (1 Peter 3:15)

2. Defend the Gospel (Phil. 1:17)

3. Answer every question (Col. 4:6)

4. Contend for the Faith (Jude 3)

Page 35: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?IV. Why is Apologetics Needed?

A. The Bible commands itA. The Bible commands it

B. The Culture demandsB. The Culture demands itit

1.1. Relativism Relativism—No view is absolutely —No view is absolutely true. true.

2. 2. PluralismPluralism—All views are relatively —All views are relatively true.true.

3. 3. NaturalismNaturalism—No supernatural view is —No supernatural view is actually true.actually true.

Apologetics answers these obstacles to faithApologetics answers these obstacles to faith

Page 36: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

C. S. Lewis on Why Apologetics?C. S. Lewis on Why Apologetics? "To be ignorant and simple now--

not to be able to meet the enemies on their ground--would be to throw down our weapons, and to betray our uneducated brethren who have, under God, no defense but us against the intellectual attacks of the heathen. Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy needs to be answered.”

"To be ignorant and simple now--not to be able to meet the enemies on their ground--would be to throw down our weapons, and to betray our uneducated brethren who have, under God, no defense but us against the intellectual attacks of the heathen. Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy needs to be answered.” (The Weight of Glory, 50)(The Weight of Glory, 50)

Page 37: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

The ProblemThe ProblemChristianity is declaring:Christianity is declaring:1. An 1. An absoluteabsolute truth in a truth in a relativisticrelativistic time. time.2. An 2. An exclusivisticexclusivistic message to a message to a pluralisticpluralistic

mind-set.mind-set.3. A 3. A supernaturalisticsupernaturalistic view in a view in a naturalistic naturalistic

venue. venue.

Note:Note: Addressing the challenge of our culture Addressing the challenge of our culture is needed so that they are able to is needed so that they are able to understand the content of our understand the content of our communication.communication.

Page 38: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineIV. Why is Apologetics Needed? A. The Bible commands it B. The Culture demands it C. The Church Needs it

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed? A. The Bible commands it B. The Culture demands it C. The Church Needs it

Page 39: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

C. The Church needs itC. The Church needs it 1. 80% of 1. 80% of active teens leave in their 20s

2. Main reasons are doubts in the Bibleare doubts in the Bible 3. When did the doubts begin: 3. When did the doubts begin:

4% in Grade School4% in Grade School

40% in Middle School40% in Middle School 44% in High School44% in High School 11% in College11% in College

Note 1Note 1: : Doubt Doubt begins in Grade School;begins in Grade School;

DepartureDeparture occurs in College occurs in College

Note 2Note 2: : Only Only 9% of evangelicals 9% of evangelicals have a Christian have a Christian world view!world view!

Only Only 51% of evangelical pastors 51% of evangelical pastors have a have a Christian world view! Christian world view!

Page 40: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

OutlineOutlineIV. Why is Apologetics Needed? A. The Bible commands it B. The Culture demands it C. The Church Needs it

D. The Results confirm it

IV. Why is Apologetics Needed? A. The Bible commands it B. The Culture demands it C. The Church Needs it

D. The Results confirm it

Page 41: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

How Apologetics Helped AugustineHow Apologetics Helped Augustine

• He reasoned his way from skepticism.

• A Christian debater helped deliver him from Manichaeism.

• The philosopher Plotinus helped him reason from materialism.

• He reasoned his way from skepticism.

• A Christian debater helped deliver him from Manichaeism.

• The philosopher Plotinus helped him reason from materialism.

Page 42: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Astronomy Leads to Genesis 1:1 “Now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world. The details differ, but the essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of genesis are the same: the chain of events leading to man commence suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy" (God & the Astronomers, 14).

Astronomy Leads to Genesis 1:1 “Now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world. The details differ, but the essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of genesis are the same: the chain of events leading to man commence suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy" (God & the Astronomers, 14).

Page 43: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Atheist Reasons to DesignerAtheist Reasons to Designer

"Biochemical systems are exceedingly complex, so much so that the chance of

their being formed through random shuffling …is insensibly different from zero." So, there must be "...an intelligence, which designed the biochemicals and gave rise to the origin of carbonaceous life" (Hoyle, Evolution from Space, 3, 143).

"Biochemical systems are exceedingly complex, so much so that the chance of

their being formed through random shuffling …is insensibly different from zero." So, there must be "...an intelligence, which designed the biochemicals and gave rise to the origin of carbonaceous life" (Hoyle, Evolution from Space, 3, 143).

Page 44: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Scientific Evidence led Einstein

to Posit Mind Behind Nature

Scientific Evidence led Einstein

to Posit Mind Behind Nature • "The harmony of natural

law...reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection" (cited in Heeren, Shew Me God, 66).

• "The harmony of natural law...reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection" (cited in Heeren, Shew Me God, 66).

Albert EinsteinAlbert Einstein

Page 45: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

“It is simply inconceivable that any material matrix or field can generate agents who think and act…. A force field does not plan or think. So…the world of living, conscious, thinking beings has to originate in a living Source, a Mind” (There is a God, 183).

Anthony FlewAnthony Flew

Notorious Atheists Reasoned to GodNotorious Atheists Reasoned to God

Page 46: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

“Nor do I claim to have had any personal experience of God or any experience that may be called super- natural or miraculous. In short, my discovery of the divine has been a pilgrimage of reason and not of faith” (93).

“Nor do I claim to have had any personal experience of God or any experience that may be called super- natural or miraculous. In short, my discovery of the divine has been a pilgrimage of reason and not of faith” (93).

Reason Leads Atheist to GodReason Leads Atheist to God

Page 47: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Famous Astronomer Finds GodFamous Astronomer Finds God “The world is too

complicated in all of its parts to be due to chance alone…. The more one learns of biochemistry the more unbelievable it becomes unless there is some kind of organizing principle

--an architect for believers..." (Truth [1985], 54).

“The world is too complicated in all of its parts to be due to chance alone…. The more one learns of biochemistry the more unbelievable it becomes unless there is some kind of organizing principle

--an architect for believers..." (Truth [1985], 54).

Page 48: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Noted Atheist Found God!Noted Atheist Found God! “I do not feel that I am

the product of chance, a speck of dust in the universe, but someone who was expected, prepared, prefigured. In short, a being whom only a Creator could put here” (National Review, 11 June, 1982), 677.

“I do not feel that I am the product of chance, a speck of dust in the universe, but someone who was expected, prepared, prefigured. In short, a being whom only a Creator could put here” (National Review, 11 June, 1982), 677.

Page 49: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

[As an atheist] my argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line.

[As an atheist] my argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. Straight Line = Absolute StandardStraight Line = Absolute Standard

Moral Law Led Atheist to GodMoral Law Led Atheist to God

C.S. LewisMere Christianity, 45.C.S. LewisMere Christianity, 45.

Page 50: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Former Atheist Converted

Former Atheist Converted

“What actually led me back was a growing intuition that my condition was objectively evil…. Evil is deficiency in good; there is no such thing as an evil "substance," an evil-in-itself. So if my condition really was evil, there had to be some good of which my condition was the ruination…. I had been so wrong, for so long, so profoundly, that it seemed that almost anything might be true–even the faith that I had abandoned” (Ignatius Press, 2006).

“What actually led me back was a growing intuition that my condition was objectively evil…. Evil is deficiency in good; there is no such thing as an evil "substance," an evil-in-itself. So if my condition really was evil, there had to be some good of which my condition was the ruination…. I had been so wrong, for so long, so profoundly, that it seemed that almost anything might be true–even the faith that I had abandoned” (Ignatius Press, 2006).

Converted Atheists

Page 51: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Noted Atheist Scientist Finds GodNoted Atheist Scientist Finds God “Why would such a universal

and uniquely human hunger [for God] exist, if it were not connected to some opportunity for fulfillment?... Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. A baby feels hunger: well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim: well, there is such a thing as water” (The Language of God, 38).

“Why would such a universal and uniquely human hunger [for God] exist, if it were not connected to some opportunity for fulfillment?... Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. A baby feels hunger: well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim: well, there is such a thing as water” (The Language of God, 38).

Francis CollinsFrancis Collins

Page 52: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Former Atheist: “After twenty eight

years as a believer, the Moral Law still stands out for me as the strongest signpost to God. More than that, it points to a God who cares about human beings, and a God who is infinitely good and holy” (p. 218).

Former Atheist: “After twenty eight

years as a believer, the Moral Law still stands out for me as the strongest signpost to God. More than that, it points to a God who cares about human beings, and a God who is infinitely good and holy” (p. 218).

Page 53: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Evidence Leads Skeptic to ChristEvidence Leads Skeptic to Christ

• Skeptic converted in attempt to disprove Christianity

• First Chapter titled

“The Book that Refused to be Written”

• Skeptic converted in attempt to disprove Christianity

• First Chapter titled

“The Book that Refused to be Written”

Page 54: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

From Atheism to ChristianityFrom Atheism to Christianity

• Former Atheists

• Donald Bly and family

• Near St. Louis, MO

• Converted 1971

• Mundelein, IL

• Former Atheists

• Donald Bly and family

• Near St. Louis, MO

• Converted 1971

• Mundelein, IL

Page 55: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Apologetics Clears Roadblocks to FaithApologetics Clears Roadblocks to Faith

“WOW! I just got done reading Why I Am a Christian, and I

was blown away. It is perhaps the most powerful and influential Christian book I’ve ever read.

It was exactly what I was looking for. It provided the answers to

the roadblocks that were guarding against my faith…. Your book pressed the red button setting off the nuclear bomb of my faith.” (James Warmels 6/27/05)

“WOW! I just got done reading Why I Am a Christian, and I

was blown away. It is perhaps the most powerful and influential Christian book I’ve ever read.

It was exactly what I was looking for. It provided the answers to

the roadblocks that were guarding against my faith…. Your book pressed the red button setting off the nuclear bomb of my faith.” (James Warmels 6/27/05)

Page 56: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

God Used Evidence to Bring Real FaithGod Used Evidence to Bring Real Faith

“This book, ‘Baker Encyclopedia of Christian

Apologetics,’ is something I will have forever…. I cannot

even express with enough words all the ways God has proven Himself to me…. I

was raised in a Christian home but I came to realize that I believed in Christianity merely because I was told it was true, which is interesting because now that I know it to be true I know that I never truly BELIEVED to begin with.” (R. Johnson 12/1/06)

“This book, ‘Baker Encyclopedia of Christian

Apologetics,’ is something I will have forever…. I cannot

even express with enough words all the ways God has proven Himself to me…. I

was raised in a Christian home but I came to realize that I believed in Christianity merely because I was told it was true, which is interesting because now that I know it to be true I know that I never truly BELIEVED to begin with.” (R. Johnson 12/1/06)

Page 57: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Apologetics Can Lead to SalvationApologetics Can Lead to Salvation “God sent me your book ‘I

Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist’…. I opened the

book thinking I would rip it apart with my superior viewpoint and about one quarter of the way through I ended up apologizing to God and accepting him into my heart. I have since grown exponentially in Christ, and I thought I would thank you for your inspiring book (Ryan 11/10/06).

“God sent me your book ‘I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be

an Atheist’…. I opened the book thinking I would rip it apart with my superior viewpoint and about one quarter of the way through I ended up apologizing to God and accepting him into my heart. I have since grown exponentially in Christ, and I thought I would thank you for your inspiring book (Ryan 11/10/06).

Page 58: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

Some Unbelievers ConvertedSome Unbelievers Converted “For several [years] we’ve

prayed for my son in law an avowed Atheist. After

reading your book…here is his note: “I thought I’d drop you a line and let you know that I finished the book yesterday, and as I was sitting at my desk at work that morning, I came to realize that even if I didn’t have every answer to every question, I at least had a preponderance of evidence in my hands, which has finally tipped the scales in God’s direction again. So I said a prayer and accepted Jesus.’” (Bernard LaTour, 6/4/05)

“For several [years] we’ve prayed for my son in law an avowed Atheist. After

reading your book…here is his note: “I thought I’d drop you a line and let you know that I finished the book yesterday, and as I was sitting at my desk at work that morning, I came to realize that even if I didn’t have every answer to every question, I at least had a preponderance of evidence in my hands, which has finally tipped the scales in God’s direction again. So I said a prayer and accepted Jesus.’” (Bernard LaTour, 6/4/05)

Page 59: An Apologetic for Apologetics Copyright by Norman L. Geisler 2013.

ConclusionConclusionWhy Apologetics?Because:

1. God commanded it.

2. Our culture demands it.

3. The church needs it.

4. The results confirm it.

Why Apologetics?Because:

1. God commanded it.

2. Our culture demands it.

3. The church needs it.

4. The results confirm it.