Walmart Energy Efficiency- Energy Efficiency Workshop - Bangalore
AN ANALYSIS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY APPLYING ENERGY
-
Upload
harison-gimang-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
155 -
download
0
Transcript of AN ANALYSIS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY APPLYING ENERGY
AN ANALYSIS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR HIGH RISE BUILDING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL
NETWORK
STUDENT NAME: HARISON GIMANG ANAK RICHARD
ID NUMBER : 51210113779
SUPERVISORS : Ir MOHD FAIRUZ BIN ABDUL HAMID (Main Supervisor)
: DR NOR AZUANA BINTI RAMLI (Co-Supervisor)
: PUAN AZIZAH KASSIM (External Industrial Co-Supervisor)
Collaboration with:
INTRODUCTION
What is ENERGY EFFICIENCY?
Maintain the same OR less amount of energy
consumption to produce the better output
Process (Equipment/Operations)
Using less energy to accomplish the same task
and enjoy the same comfort level
INPUT OUTPUT
-Electricity
-Temperature
-Coal
-Production-Bills-Quality-Comfort level
Why ENERGY EFFICIENCY?Electricity Supply Act 1990Efficient Management of Electrical Energy Regulations 2008
Section 3 (1A)- Any installation which receives electrical energy from a licensee or supply authority witha total electricity consumption equal to or exceeding 3,000,000 kWh as measured at onemetering point or more over any period of six consecutive months that will conducted byREEM
PLO Cover: PLO 2, PLO 12, PLO 1
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000Electricity Consumption
(kWh/capital)
Source: Energy Commission and Economic
Planning Unit 2015
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
GW
h
Year
Energy Demand: BAU vs NEEAP
BAU
NEEAP
Problem Statements
1.) Office building contributes to the largest energy consumption in Malaysia
(Sadaf Zeeshan, 2014)
2.( Increasing of the electricity tariff where 29.6 sen/kWh for the first 200kWh
and 37.2sen/kWh for the next kWh
(https://www.tnb.com.my/commercial-industrial/pricing-tariffs1)
3.)The increasing of carbon emissions which is 0.747kg per 1kWh emitted to
the atmosphere for each 1kWh electricity generated by power plant
(http://seda.gov.my)
4.) Lack of awareness monitoring on building energy management where lead
to inefficiency energy management
PLO Cover: PLO 2, PLO 12, PLO 1
To provide a guideline/benchmarking for industry in
improving the energy consumption and cost saving
To identify highest energy consumptions
systems/application in the building
To analyze and mitigation the EE using artificial neural
network prediction
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the potential energy efficiency approach in
the commercial building
PLO Cover: PLO 2, PLO 12, PLO 1
High rise building commercial building
-Skywarth Building 33 Storeys
-Skymage Building 44 Storeys
-Building system process
-Government policy certifications or standard
requirement
-Useful floor area of over 1000m2
Prediction based on artificial neural network
-Multi Layer Perceptron
-Radial Basic Function
Comparison with Traditional method
-Linear Regression
Scope Of Project
References standard
-ISO 50001 Energy monitoring
-MS 1525
PLO Cover: PLO 2, PLO 12, PLO 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
• Software base CLTD
• Major energy utilization
• Divided into 11 areas
Case study optimization of energy management in an
office building
(Sadaf Zeeshan, 2014)
• Various types of artificial neural network method
• Prediction based on heating, cooling, indoor air etc.
• Each building with different method of ANN
Energy analysis of a abuilding using artificial
neural network
(Kumar.R et al, 2013)
Previous Research
PLO Cover: PLO 2,PLO1,PLO 11
METHODOLOGY
Research FrameworkAudit energy consumption in the building
Monitor, target and compile data collection
(Energy consumption information)
Analyze the retrofitting impact on the active power
consumption
Prediction of energy consumption by using ANN
(SPSS Statistic software)
Comparison with mathematical method
ResultsPLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
Electricity Accounting
8.1, 8%
6, 6%2.1, 2%
1.5, 2%
50.00%, 1%
1.3, 1%
0.1, 0%
37.4, 37%
24.4, 24%
18.6, 19%
80.5, 80%
Skywarth Building Energy Accounting
Office Equipment & Small Power
Chilled Water Pumps
Elavators
Air Cooled Split
Mechanical Pump
Fan Coil Unit
Compound and Façade Lighting
Indoor Lighting
Air Handling Unit
3.2, 3%
11.6, 12%
1.1, 1%
2.6, 3%
3.4, 3%
2, 2%
34.4, 34%
16, 16%
10.7, 11%15.1, 15%
76.2, 76%
Skymage Building Energy Accounting
Chilled Water Pumps
Elavators
Air Cooled Split Unit
Fan Coil Unit
Mechanical Pump
Compound and Façade Lighting2.0Indoor Lighting
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
Variable Parameter
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
Classification of Energy Efficiency Investment Through Energy Performance Contract (EPC)
1NO/LOW COST
EASY
3HIGH COST
EASY
2NO/LOW COST
HARD
4HIGH COST
HARD
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
Potential Toward Energy Efficiency Approach
(1) Control of maximum demand
Skywarth and Skymage building
(2) Lamp De-lamping Skywarth and Skymage building
(1) BCS Reschedule Operating Hour for
LightingSkywarth building
(1) 24 Hours Mobile Workstation
Skywarth and Skymage building
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
(3) Use of Occupancy Sensor
Skywarth and Skymage building(3) Energy Awareness Campaign
Skywarth and Skymage building
(2) Tariff management
Skywarth and Skymage building
(3) LightingRetrofitting
Skywarth and Skymage building
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
Based on biological brain
Multilayer Perceptron methodRadial Basic Function method
Data processing occurs at neurons or nodes
Output a single based on the input signal
Artificial Neural Network
PLO Cover: PLO 12,PLO 5, PLO1
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
Energy Prediction Comparison
0.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
400,000.00
500,000.00
600,000.00
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTI
ON
MONTH
Building Skywarth MLP vs RBF vs Linear Regression
ELECTRICITYCONSUMPTIONLinear Regression
MLP
RBF
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
Jan
-13
Mar
-13
May
-13
Jul-
13
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
Jan
-14
Mar
-14
May
-14
Jul-
14
Sep
-14
No
v-1
4
Jan
-15
Mar
-15
May
-15
Jul-
15
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTI
ON
MONTH
Skymage Building MLP vs RBF vs Linear Regression
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION
Liniear Regression
MLP
RBF
PLO Cover: PLO 4, PLO 5
Accuracy Comparison
Method Error Sqt
Skywarth Building
Multilayer Perceptron 24626.78954
Radial Basic Function 25480.459
Linear Regression 30491.231
(LARGEST)
Skymage Building
Multilayer Perceptron 57532.9886
Radial Basic Function 66970.32327
Linear Regression 91738.31389
(LARGEST)
PLO Cover: PLO 4, PLO 5
Cost Saving And BEI
PLO Cover: PLO 4, PLO 5, PLO 12
Skywarth Building BEI Baseline
Annual Electricity Consumption (Actual) (kWh) 5,907,068.00
Building GFA (exclude basement) (m²) 50,064.00
Building Nett Usable areas (m²) 38,187.00
BEI based on GFA (kWh/m²/year) 118.00
BEI based on Nett Usable/Lettable Areas
(kWh/m²/year) 155.00
Annual Electricity Consumption (MLP)(kWh) 5,754,632.00
BEI based on GFA (kWh/m²/year) 115.00
BEI based on Nett Usable/Lettable Areas
(kWh/m²/year) 151.00
Potential Saving (RM) 55,639.00
Energy Efficiency Retrofitting Approach Investment
(RM) 499,539.00
Return of Investment, ROI (Years) 9 Years
Sykmage Building BEI Baseline
Annual Electricity Consumption (Actual) (kWh) 9,219,390.00
Building GFA (exclude basement) (m²) 71,598.00
Building Nett Usable areas (m²) 54,005.00
BEI based on GFA (kWh/m²/year) 129.00
BEI based on Nett Usable/Lettable Areas
(kWh/m²/year) 171.00
Annual Electricity Consumption (MLP)(kWh) 8,815,588.00
BEI based on GFA (kWh/m²/year) 123.00
BEI based on Nett Usable/Lettable Areas
(kWh/m²/year) 163.00
Potential Saving (RM) 147,388.00
Energy Efficiency Retrofitting Approach Investment
(RM) 499,539.00
Return of Investment (Years) 3 Years
CONCLUSION
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSION
From this research the highest energy consumption in both building is the lighting system. There are 8 energy efficiency approach's that had been identify for the Skywarth building
and 7 approach's for the Skymage building and the approach that had been selected is the lighting retrofitting. By using Multilayer Perceptron the amount of potential saving for Skywarth and Skymage is worth RM55,639 and RM147,388 with the ROI of 9 years and 3 years. This research also provide the BEI based on the selected baseline which is
January 2013 until December 2013 for both buildings by using actual value and the prediction value that can be obtain by the energy efficiency method that had been
selected.
RECOMMENDATIONS
For the future work recommendation are add extra method such as ARIMA for comparison, add the element of design in terms of new system that can be applied to the
building either in electrical or mechanical, add another factor that contribute to energy consumption and implementation of solar PV system to the building
PLO Cover: PLO 11
APPENDIX