An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

download An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

of 23

Transcript of An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    1/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    2/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    3/23

    Outline1. Purposes of the study2. Methodology

    3. The results

    4. Conclusion

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    4/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    5/23

    Purposes of the study

    The aim of the present paper:to clarify the lexicon categories and

    the pattern that was use on the diplomatic

    discourses of Hillary Clinton, the secretary

    of state.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    6/23

    Methodology

    In this study; two speeches of HillaryClinton are selected from the website of U.S.

    Department Of State: http://www.state.gov.

    The date of the speeches was 7 June

    2012 and 27 September 2012 respectively.

    Data collections

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    7/23

    Methodology

    - Tropes, which is a freeware text analyzeprogram, help analyze the text data and codedinto manageable content categories.

    Instruments

    - MAXQDA, was used in counting and word frequency

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    8/23

    Methodology

    - Discourse Schematic was adapt from thestudy on international diplomacy discourse byRay T. Donahue and Michael H. Prosser.

    Instruments

    - The Coherence or textual semantics frameworkwas adapted from Wodak (1986) which will help tounderstand the relationship between within context.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    9/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    10/23

    The results

    1. Discourse analysis concepts: Discourse Schematicwhich is coherent between two speeches

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    11/23

    The results

    Salutation

    (1) Thank you very much, Ahmet, and once again,thank you for hosting us in this beautiful city and forbeing a steadfast champion of this forum

    (2) America and our partners have more than doubledthe number of people who get AIDS drugs. Well soon

    cut maternal mortality by a quarter.How? The answer may surprise you.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    12/23

    The results

    Introduction (move to the body)

    (1) In recent years, the international communityhas made important strides in the fight againstviolent extremism in all its forms.

    (2) When I became Secretary of State, I asked ourdiplomats and development experts:Howcan we do better?

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    13/23

    The results

    Summoning cooperation (Body)

    (1) First, we have to continue working together todefeat extremist ideology, blunt the spread

    (2) together, we made concrete commitments on

    five specific strategiesfrom focusing our funding onthe hardest-hit populations of radicalization,and slow the flow of recruits to terrorist networks.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    14/23

    The results

    Conclusion

    (1) All of us share a commitment to take on thischallenge, and the United States is very proud tocontinue working with you to further our commonefforts. Thank you very much.

    (2) In short, Americas investments in global health are

    saving lives. They are making us more secure, andadvancing our values. But it is a shared responsibility.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    15/23

    The results

    - The rhetoric pro-forms; we, our, you, they, themare ranked in the first top-ten

    - In speech (1), the speech style shown in Enunciative;

    setting some influence, or revealing a point of view.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    16/23

    The results

    - Most of the words in speech (1) were into

    the Politics & society category which show the high

    used of word in Law & Justice sub-category that

    alsoindicate the relation to crimesNeed, terrorist, terrorisms, counterterrorism,countries, law, states, rule, international,

    strengthening, cooperation, understand,education, extremism, violent, center, and al-qaida.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    17/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    18/23

    The results

    Which most of the words, were into the Health, life and

    casualties category, show the high used of word inMedicine & health sub-category.Health, global, aids, work, partners, donors,

    diplomacy, investments, plan, program,Malaria, HIV, sustainable, and do.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    19/23

    The results

    The word choices in both speeches are serve

    the purpose of the requirement of thesediplomatic discourses.

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    20/23

    ConclusionDiscourse Analysis Concepts:

    Summarize the Features of Hillary Clinton's Speeches.

    - Opening salutations in speeches

    - Introduction

    - Summoning cooperation- Conclusion

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    21/23

    ConclusionSummarize Lexicon Categories of Both HillaryClinton's Speeches.First speech:

    - Most of lexicon used in the discourse was in Health,Life and Causalities categorySecond speech

    - Most of lexicon used in the discourse was inPolitics & Society category

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    22/23

  • 7/31/2019 An Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse in the Remarks

    23/23