Night at the Library Family Engagement Project by Jenna Rizzi
Amsterdam Institute of Finance Joseph V. Rizzi November, 2009 PRODUCTS: EXPANDED DEBT CAPACITY...
-
Upload
tyrone-mccarthy -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Amsterdam Institute of Finance Joseph V. Rizzi November, 2009 PRODUCTS: EXPANDED DEBT CAPACITY...
Amsterdam Institute of FinanceJoseph V. Rizzi
November, 2009
22
Rising purchase price multiples and ROE concerns drove acquirers to seek ways to expand their debt capacity. Some of the most common techniques are:
Adjusted (Increased) EBITDA- Operating improvements- Normalization
Asset Sales- Bridges to asset sales- Liquidity is key in case bridge cannot be taken out
Innovative Securities- Defer interest- Push out amortization- Increase flexibility
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
2
Term Amortization Covenant Call Seniority Secured
Revolver 5 – 7 Bullet FULL YES YES YES
Term Loan A 5 – 7 40% in first 5 years FULL YES YES YES
Institutional Term Loans
7 - 8 1% per annum / bullet FULL YES YES YES
Covenant Lite 8 - 10 1% per annum / Bullet LIGHT PREMIUM YES YES
Mezzanine 10 + Bullet LIGHT PREMIUM NO Depends
High Yield 10 + Bullet LIGHT PREMIUM NO NO
Holding Company PIK
10 + Bullet LIGHT PREMIUM NO NO
Bridge Term Loans 1 - 3 Bullet FULL YES YES YES
Securitization 1 - 5 Revolver with Borrowing Base
FULL YES YES YES
Second Lien 8-9 Bullet FULL YES YES YES
Bifurcated Lien(cross lien)
8-10 1% P.A./Bullet Yes Yes Yes Partial
Unsecured 1-10 1% P.A./Bullet Yes Yes Yes No
OPCO/PROPCO 10+ Bullet Yes Yes Yes Yes
The above table shows the features of different debt options available to issuers The availability of the different options is subject to market conditions
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
3
44
Innovative securities allow for the expansion of debt capacity by one or more of the following mechanisms:
Reduce Annual Debt Service - Reducing cash interest expense - Lengthen duration (Reduce/Delay amortization)
Increasing Flexibility - Covenants - Public Disclosure - Cash flow control - Call Premium - Bridging - Partial/fully Unsecured
Tranching (sequential ordering of payment or priorities) - Holding Company instruments - Restricted Subsidiaries - Second lien/bifurcated collateral-crossing liens - Senior/Subordinated
Cost – Second Lien vs Mez
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
4
55
• Understand the motivation behind the structure
• Satisfy the demands of the bank group lending at the operating level
• Tax driven• Provide greater financial flexibility to re-lever• Position the company to make an acquisition• Tap unserved investor base
• Understand how they will fare in insolvency• Understand how they are priced
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
5
6666
Holding company debt◦ relies on funds from the sub through dividends or tax sharing
agreements◦ may be secured by the stock of the operating subsidiary
◦ the exercise of the pledged shares by the bondholders at the holding company may constitute a change of control provision of the debt at the subsidiary
◦ may be guaranteed through upstream guarantees◦ may contain cross default clauses to the debts of other
entities
Measure effective leverage through use of consolidated financial statements◦ Look for multiple leveraging or the use of debt borrowed at
one entity as equity in another to support further leveraging
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
6
77
Senior Secured, but with Junior or Second Lien◦ Higher default◦ Lower recovery
Originally developed as Rescue Finance Competing with EURO Mezzanine
◦ Investors – hedge funds and CLO Formerly Attractive Pricing: Spread differential between
Second Lien and First Lien 350 BP. Issues:
- Inter-creditor - Standstill Agreement - Obligations - New Investors Behavior in a Workout- CLO Rating Impact
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
7
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
8
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
October 22, 2009
9
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
10
1111
Covenant Issues◦ Creditor – preserve deal; recovery value◦ Debtor - flexibility
Covenant Lite – liquidity vs. structure◦ Similar to Investment Grade◦ One or No Financial Covenants
Rating Agency impact on CLO Volume
◦ US 1H07 – 104B (35% of loans) 3H07 – Virtually 0
◦ Europe – Shut down 1Q08 difficult
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2000
11
1212
Example:-◦ Target company de-merged into ‘PropCo’, which owns the real estate
assets, and ‘OpCo’, the operating company.◦ Banks finance ‘PropCo’ acquisition of properties at agreed Loan to
Value ratio.◦ ‘PropCo’ leases the real estate assets to ‘OpCo’.◦ ‘PropCo’ debt refinanced by traditional Property Lenders or via
Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) market. ◦ ‘OpCo’ required to service the acquisition debt not assumed by
‘PropCo’.
By structuring the financing of a pool of assets with a credit quality stronger than the
corporate credit as a whole, ‘OpCo’ \ ‘PropCo’ financing can provide a cost effective source of
(acquisition) financing.
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
12
‘‘OpCo \ PropCo’ Financing (2)OpCo \ PropCo’ Financing (2)
Financing Notes
OpCo PropCo
BidCo
Rental Payments
Approx.100%
Approx.100%
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
13
1414
Requirements:◦ Stable and resilient cash flows from business◦ Control over cash flows through sale of assets or
adequate legal structure◦ Target investment grade rating to maximize access
to investors and lower cost of capital
Different leverage measurements
Issues◦ Favorable bankruptcy laws◦ Inter-creditor issues◦ Flexibility
Closed: 2H07 to present
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
14
1515
• Longer Term Bonds
7-10 years and longer
4/5 NC
• Public or Private
Usually issued in private form with exchange rights
Pricing would step up if bonds not public within short period (say 180
days of close)
• Usually issued as subordinated debt but can also be senior
unsecured
• Markets
US - $871B size
Euro - €65B size
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
15
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
• Registration Rights
16
1717
Key High Yield TermsKey High Yield Terms
• Registration Rights
• Issuer
• Status
• Degree of Subordination
• Limitations on liens
• Limitations on indebtedness
• Restricted payments
• Asset sales
• Change in control
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
17
1818
Covenants * Extensive (bank type) * Maintenance basis (tested quarterly)
Security * Second secured
Call Provisions * Generally callable immediately (103,102,101)
Maturity * Ten year
Pricing * LIBOR + 800 bps (400 cash, 400 PIK) * Warrants for total return (15-17%)
Liquidity * Low
Disclosure: * Limited
Marketing * No research coverage, no roadshow
Rating Requirements * None
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
18
19Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
20Amsterdam Institute of Finance
November, 2009
21
Trend: Increasing segmentation of loans with reduced covenant or collateral◦ Percentage of institutional loans with impaired covenants or collateral
1H07 47%, 2H07-Nil 2006 24%
◦ Breakdown 2007 1H07 47% 11% Second Lien 6.4% Bifurcated 23% Covenant Lite 7% Unsecured
Bifurcated/Crossing Liens – See HCA for an example◦ Asset backed revolving credit backed by first lien or receivables and inventory◦ Term loans back by lien on other non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment Stock pledge
◦ Pricing premium – 100 bps compared to revolver◦ Inter-creditor complications
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
2222
PIKPIK•Pay if you can togglePay if you can toggle
•Eats up equityEats up equity
•CharacteristicsCharacteristics
PIK SLL
Spread 825/900 500
Toggle 900-1000 n/a
Term 7.5-10 9.5
Call 5xNC n/a
Leverage 6.5x+ 6x+
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
(Source: LCD)
2323
Staple financing term sheet to deal book
Be prepared to fund
Establishes ceiling
Conflicts of interest
Stapled FinancingStapled Financing
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
Bridge LoansBridge Loans
Equity◦ Bank provides equity
Find other equity investors later or keep Reduce PE equity Lowers need for club or larger deals
◦ Rationale – pay to play
◦ Bonds
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
24
2525
Increasing layers of debt Directed at different investors Intercreditors conflicts
2004 + 2H07 - Present
• Common equity
• Unsecured/mezzanine (1x)
• Senior secured bank loan (4x)
- Amortizing T/LA – 40%
- B/C tranches – 60%
FDX – 5x + PPX – 7.5 +
2006 – 1H07
• Common equity
• Hybrid preferred (0.5x)
• PIK notes (0.5x)
• Unsecured/mezzanine (1x)
• Carve-out collateral (1x)
- securitization
- OPCO/PROPCO
• Second lien loans (1x)
• Senior secured bank loan (4x)
- Amortizing T/LA – 20%
- B/C tranches – 80%
FDX – 6x + PPX – 8.5 +Amsterdam Institute of Finance
November, 200925
2626
HCA – 33 bln USD (corp rating B2/B+)◦ FDX – 6.53x (LTM)◦ PPX – 7.7x◦ Club – Bain, KKR, ML (5 bln)◦ W/W – BofA, JPMC, Citi, ML ◦ Debt Package
1st Lien (3.46x) TermSpread
Amortization
(cum. At maturity)
- R/C 2.000 bln
- ABL 2.000 bln
- T/LA 2.250 bln
- T/LB 9.300 bln
- EUR T/L 1.250 bln
6
6
6
7
7
250
175
250
250
250
0
0
50%
7%
7%
2nd Lien (1.33x)
- Cash 4.200 bln
- PIK/T 1.500 bln
8
8
9.75%
10.0 %
8%
8%
Existing unsecured
7.470 bln 2009 7.5 % --
Equity 4.965 bln -- -- --
◦ EBITDA/I – 1.9x (2007E)◦ EBITDA – CAPEX/I – 1.1x (2007E)
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
26
27
HCA HCA Legal StructureLegal Structure
Europeansubs
Sub C
Healthtrust Holdings
Management
Euro T/L
Unrestricted subs Restricted subs(gurantors)
Sub D Sub ESub BSub A
Acquisition CorpHCA, Inc
Equity
Bank Loans
Existing Notes
Sponsors
Merge
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
27
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
28
2929
Strategic Buyers Pricing Primarily a function of synergies
Financial Buyers Pricing Primarily a function of Debt Capacity
(FD/EBITDA)*EBITDA + Equity + Asset Sales
Developing The Funded Debt Multiple:
Maximum Debt Capacity = [EBITDA/(I + 1/N)] + Asset Sales + Refinancing
Multiple =1/(I + 1/n)
Increasing Debt Capacity:
i = by decreasing interest expense (rates + spread)
1/n = by lengthening maturities through changes to the structure (bridges, hybrids, etc.)
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
29
3030
Purchase Price MatrixPurchase Price Matrix
10% 15% 20%
25% 30% 35% 40%
3.0x 333 353 375 400 429 462 500
3.5x 389 412 438 467 500 538 583
4.0x 444 471 500 533 571 615 667
4.5x 500 529 563 600 643 692 750
5.0x 556 588 625 667 714 769 833
5.5x 611 647 688 706 750 800 917
6.0x 667 706 750 800 857 923 1,000
6.5x 722 765 813 867 929 1,000 1,083
7.0x 778 824 875 933 1,000 1,077 1,167
7.5x 833 882 938 1,000 1,071 1,154 1,250
Assuming an acquisition where the Target’s EBITDA is $100 mln, the maximum purchase price that could be paid given the sponsor’s desired level of equity injection and the amount of leverage that the market will bear.
Equity Contribution
Le
ve
rag
e M
ult
iple
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
30
3131
Purchase Price MatrixPurchase Price Matrix
10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
3.0x 333 353 375 400 429 462 500
3.5x 389 412 438 467 500 538 583
4.0x 444 471 500 533 571 615 667
4.5x 500 529 563 600 643 692 750
5.0x 556 588 625 667 714 769 833
5.5x 611 647 688 733 786 846 917
6.0x 667 706 750 800 857 923 1,000
6.5x 722 765 813 867 929 1,000 1,083
7.0x 778 824 875 933 1,000 1,077 1,167
7.5x 833 882 938 1,000 1,071 1,154 1,250
As can be seen below, when the leverage multiple decreases, the required equity contribution can increase significantly. Depending on the buyers internal rate of return requirements, this may or may not cause them to abort the transaction.
Equity Contribution
Le
ve
rag
e M
ult
iple
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November 2009
31
3232
Purchase Price MatrixPurchase Price MatrixThe shaded area of the chart below reflects the financing gap that develops when leverage multiples do not keep up with increasing purchase price multiples. Innovative securities have been developed to close the financing gap.
Debt Multiple
Pu
rch
as
e P
ric
e M
ult
iple
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
4.50 160 110 60 10 (40) (90) (140)
5.00 200 150 100 50 - (50 )100)
5.50 240 190 140 90 40 (10) (60)
6.00 280 230 180 130 80 30 (20)
6.50 320 270 220 170 120 70 20
7.00 360 310 260 210 160 110 60
7.50 400 350 300 250 200 150 100
8.00 440 390 340 290 240 190 140
8.50 480 430 380 330 280 230 180
9.00 520 470 420 370 320 270 220
Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
32
DisclosureDisclosure
This information has been prepared solely for informational
purposes and is not intended to provide or should not be relied
upon for accounting, legal, tax, or investment advice. The factual
statements herein have been taken from sources believed to be
reliable, but such statements are made without any representation
as to accuracy or completeness. Opinions expressed are current
opinions as of the date appearing in this material only. These
materials are subject to change, completion, or amendment from
time to time without notice and CapGen Financial is not under any
obligation to keep you advise of such changes. All views expressed
in this presentation are those of the presenter, and not necessarily
those of CapGen Financial.
33Amsterdam Institute of Finance November, 2009
33