Altai Sayan Ecoregion: Connectivity in a changing climate (UNDP presentation)
-
Upload
undp-in-europe-and-cis -
Category
Self Improvement
-
view
1.361 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Altai Sayan Ecoregion: Connectivity in a changing climate (UNDP presentation)
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Adriana Dinu, UNDP, Regional Environment and Energy Practice Leader, Europe and CIS
© 2010 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission.
CONNECTIVITY IN A CHANGING CLIMATE: THE ALTAI SAYAN ECOREGION
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Overview
Altai Sayan Ecoregion:- Globally significant biodiversity- Carbon sequestration- Climate Change
Improve Connectivity - Within national borders- Across the national borders- Across ecoregions
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Altay Sayan Ecoregion
62%
29% 4%
5%
1,065,000 km2
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Mosaic of woodlands, meadows, mountain tundra, steppes and deserts in the center of Asia
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
4000 species of vascular plants ….. 12% endemic
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
700 vertebrate species
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Home for 5 million people speaking more than 20 languages
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Carbon storage: 3.21 billion tones of Carbon
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Western Altai Zapovednik Katon Karagai NP
Markakoli Zapovednik Tarbagatai NP
2.8C increase in mean annual temperature – 50 years
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
The most vulnerable ecosystems to climate change
nival (glaciers, permafrost
Alpine and tundra
Water ecosystems
Forest ecosytems
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
лесные
Climate Change Impacts in Altai: Changes in forest composition
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
1999 – 2003:
700,000 m3 wood burned on 60,000 ha: emissions of 3,600,000 t C
Climate Change Impacts in Altai: Intensification of forest fire
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Climate Change Impacts in Altai: Shifting ecosystem ranges
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
UNDP, GEF and ICI partnership: to improve connectivity in Altai Sayan as an adaptation measure to Climate Change
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Connectivity within national borders: establishing new PAs (Russia: 0.5 million ha) and improve effectiveness of existing ones
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Connectivity within national borders: Green Corridors and buffer areas in Kazakhstan
348,400 ha
Protecting carbon pools:725,000 ha of natural
forests
- 52.4 million t of carbon –
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Work within and beyond boundaries of protected areas: Fire Management
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Connectivity across borders: transboundary Protected Areas
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Country Protected area Territory, km2
Kazakhstan 2 7,184
China 1 4,377Mongolia 2 7,015Russia 7 9.533
Total 12 28,109
Altai Transboundary PA network
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Connectivity across borders: Transboundary agreements for collaboration
Altai Ubsunurskaya Kotlovina BR
Uvs Nuur Reserve
Ubsunur NP transboundary
Katusnky BR
Katun Karagai NP
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Altai ArgaliConnectivity for migratory species – Altai Argali
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Snow LeopardConnectivity for migratory species – Snow Leopard
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Connectivity across ecoregions: Altay - Baikal Megaconnectivity Conservation Corridor: proposed
Altai-Sayan eco-region
Altai – Baikal CC mega-corridor
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Challenges in designing and implementing connectivity:
Scale: institutional, across administrative boundaries, national boundaries.
Improving management effectiveness of existing areas is a more urgent priority for governments
Creating PAs areas automatically excludes any form of economic use – bias towards Category I in CIS
Assumptions that all proposed PAs will be created immediately - Expansion Plans difficult to negotiate
Funding for existing vs planned
Timeframes - gazettment takes much longer than a project lifetime
Connectivity, CBD COP 10, Nagoya, 21st October 2010
Thank you!