Alok Roy. UHV/EHV Level HV/MV Level LV Level The Concept of a power grid.
-
Upload
lorena-rodgers -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of Alok Roy. UHV/EHV Level HV/MV Level LV Level The Concept of a power grid.
Alok Roy
UHV/EHV Level
HV/MV Level
LV Level
The Concept of a power gridThe Concept of a power grid
Evolution of IndianEvolution of Indian Power GridPower Grid• Phenomenal expansion since Independence
Generation : 1349 MW 101,866 MW (in 1947) (in 2001)
Grid :
Local grid – at the time of Independence.
State Grids – emerged in 1960s.
Regional Grids – in 1970s.
Five Regional Grids – Northern, Western, Southern,
Eastern & North-eastern
National Grid – under progress.
Power Scenario – at a GlancePower Scenario – at a Glance• Existing• Installed capacity - 101,866 MW Coal – 71%
Hydro – 25 Nuclear &
others – 4%• Peak demand
Peak power - 78,000 MW Energy (average) - 1395 MU/day
• Availability Peak power - 68,000 MW Energy (average) - 1288 MU/day
• Shortage Peak power - 10,000 MW (12.8%) Energy - 107 MU/day (7.7%)
OPERATION OF LARGE INTERCONNECTED OPERATION OF LARGE INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM W.R.T. INDIAN CONTEXTSYSTEM W.R.T. INDIAN CONTEXT
• Indian Power System is ‘Large’ geographically and
very wide-spread in terms of generation and load locations
• Various electrical regions characteristically different w.r.t. the generation mix, system size, load factors, grid parameters etc.
• Evolution from state level entities to the present regional system still has inadequacies in true sense of ‘power system’
• Almost ‘Stiff’ power system elements (e.g. most Indian generators) do not rise to occasion at the time of parameter variation or contingency.
• In absence of higher order control (in terms of hierarchy) such as the AGC and near-absence of parameter based local variations in our control techniques, technical solution can not be ensured presently for steady-state operation. Dynamic and transient modes shall continue to be vulnerable areas.
Frequency of Northern Region for 03-04-2002
48.50
49.00
49.50
50.00
50.50
51.00
51.50
Time
Fre
qu
en
cy (
Hz)
Load Curve of Northern Region for dated 21-04-2002
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
18000
19000
Time
Lo
ad in
MW
47.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
51.00
52.00
53.00
54.00
55.00
Fre
qu
ency
in H
z
Load (MW) Frequency (Hz)
• BIGGER CHALLENGE TO SYSTEM OPERATORS compared to that for operators of perfect or near-perfect power system in developed countries
• WHAT NEXT?
• COMMERCIAL MECHANISM IS THE ONLY ANSWER
•Result ??
• B.1 REACTIVE POWER CONTROLREACTIVE POWER CONTROL
• LOW VOLTAGE
• Accountability of Load Power factor missing at present• Severe inadequacy in compensation at the point of
drawal• No or low redundancy in transmission and sub-
transmission levels• Overloading of distribution circuits in part or full• Lumping of capacitive compensation, sometimes at
higher voltages rather than at distribution levels• ‘Mental block’ of generation engineers to generate MVAR
upto rated value of machines
• Movement of reactive power over long distances - physically and electrically
• Low voltages, sometimes severe, even on EHV sub-stations, more accentuated when coupled with low grid frequency
Fall-out:
• Low output and in-efficient working of voltage sensitive equipment including certain generating station auxiliaries, high system losses, tripping of healthy transmission lines on distance-relay load encroachment at times, burning of certain equipment due to over-current etc.
NORTHERN REGIONAL LOAD DESPATCH CENTRE400 kV VOLTAGE PROFILE IN NORTHERN REGION AT 15:00 HRS ON 08.07.99
402
385
351 352
335
360 361
300
350
400
450
Singrauli Kanpur Ballabgarh Dadri Panipat Moga Jaipur
400 kV BUS
BU
S V
OLTA
GE
(kV
)
Capability Curve of a typical 210 MW BHEL Generator
Capability Curve of a typical 500 MW BHEL Generator
• B 2. REACTIVE POWER CONTROLREACTIVE POWER CONTROL (Contd......)
• • HIGH VOLTAGE:
• Though not encountered as frequently and as severely as Low Voltage cases/spreads in the country, but are caused mainly due to
• Underloaded system/sub-system elements
• Non-switched capacitors/banks resulting in lumped surplus MVAR in case of load drop
• Even bigger ‘Mental Block’ of generation engineers to absorb MVAR upto machine rating, usually ‘stiff’ AVR for cross-over to left.
• Non-provision of certain switched/non-switched shunt reactors on EHV/UHV lines or bus reactors
• High Voltages in the affected pockets, sometimes even
at EHV/UHV Levels, more accentuated when coupled with high frequency conditions in the grid.
• Fall-out: Tripping of overvoltages-sensitive elements
including trunk EHV/UHV Lines, dielectric failures/accelerated ageing of equipment, avoidable
power loss, common failure of heating elements etc.
Power Scenario – at a GlancePower Scenario – at a Glance All figs. are in MW
Region Peak Installed Peak Demand Capacity
Surplus/Deficit
Northern 21,000 27, 000 - 2,100Western 25,000 30,800 - 4,500Southern 20,400 24,800 - 2,600Eastern 7,800 15,700 + 2,000North-eastern 950 1,800 - 25
• Limited exchange of power between Regions --- Main reasons:
– Inadequate interconnectors, especially from Eastern Region– Lack of proper Commercial and administrative mechanisms
Demand-Availability Scenario – by Demand-Availability Scenario – by 2011-122011-12
Assumptions: • Demand – as per 16th Electric Power Survey Report (EPS).• Capacity addition – as per information available from MoP & CEA.• Generation availability (average) – 75%.
All figs. are in MW
Region Demand Installed Availability Deficit/ Capacity Surplus
Northern 49000 52354 39265 - 9735
Western 46000 53343 40007 - 5993
Southern 42000 50075 37556 - 4444
Eastern+North-east 19000 44275 33206 + 14206
Power Transfer Envisaged from ER and NER by 2012
DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL GRID
NER
ER
NR
WR
SR
EXISTING
500MW
MW1000
MW500
GAZUWAKA
CHANDRAPUR
VINDHYACHAL
SASARAM
UNDERCONST.
EXISTING
400 kV
220 kV
BONGAIGAONBIRPARA
MALDA
KORBA BUDHIPADAR
KOLHAPUR
BELGAUM
U.SILERU
BALIMELA
DEHRISAHUPURI
MALANPUR
AURAIYA
PHASE-I(By 2002)
Back
ROURKELA
RAIPUR HIRMA
TALCHER
JAIPUR
NER
ERWR
NR
SR
B'SHARIF
ALLAHABAD
SIPAT
GAZUWAKA
JEYPORECHANDRAPUR
SINGRAULI
VINDHYA-
1000MW
500MW
LUCKNOW
CHICKEN NECK
KRISHNA
TEESTA
MISA
KATHAL-GURI
LEGEND
765 KV LINES
400 KV LINES
HVDC B/B
HVDC BIPOLE
EXISTING/ X PLAN
ZERDA
HISSAR
BONGAIGAON
DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL GRID
KOLHAPUR
NARENDRA
KAIGA
MANGALORE
PONDA
IX PLAN
MARIANI
N.K.
KAHALGAON
RANGANADI
SEONI
CHEGAON
BHANDARA
DEHGAM
KARAD
LONIKAND
VAPI
GANDHAR/
TALA
BANGLA
BALLABGARH A'PUR(DELHI RING)
BANGALORE
KOZHIKODE
COCHIN
KAYAMKULAM
TRIVANDRUM
PUGALUR
KAYATHAR
KARAIKUDI
CUDDALORE
SOUTH CHENNAI
KRISHNAPATNAM
CHITTOOR
VIJAYAWADA
SINGARPET
PIPAVAV
LIMBDI
KISHENPUR
DULHASTI
WAGOORA
MOGA
URI
BHUTAN
RAMAGUNDAM
RAVI
JULLANDHAR
DESH
NAGAR
VARANASI
/UNNAO
M'BAD
PURNEA
KORBA
NAGDA
SILIGURI/BIRPARA
TEHRI
MEERUT
BHIWADI
BINA SATNA
MALANPURSHIROHI
KAWAS
PHASE - II(By 2007)
SIRSI
CHAL
JETPURAMRELI
BOISARPADGHE
DHABOL
KOYNA
/BARH
G'PUR
HOSUR
Back
ROURKELA
RAIPUR HIRMA
TALCHER
JAIPUR
NER
ERWR
NR
SR
B'SHARIF
ALLAHABAD
SIPAT
GAZUWAKA
JEYPORECHANDRAPUR
SINGRAULI
VINDHYA-
1000MW
500MW
LUCKNOW
DIHANG
CHICKEN NECK
KRISHNA
TEESTA
TIPAIMUKH
BADARPUR
MISA
DAMWE
KATHAL-GURI
LEGEND
765 KV LINES
400 KV LINES
HVDC B/B
HVDC BIPOLE
EXISTING/ X PLAN XI PLAN
ZERDA
HISSAR
BONGAIGAON
DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL GRID
KOLHAPUR
NARENDRA
KAIGA
MANGALORE
PONDA
IX PLAN
MARIANI
N.K.
KAHALGAON
RANGANADI
SEONI
CHEGAON
BHANDARA
DEHGAM
KARAD
LONIKAND
VAPI
GANDHAR/
TALAARUN
BANGLA
BALLABGARH A'PUR(DELHI RING)
BANGALORE
KOZHIKODE
COCHIN
KAYAMKULAM
TRIVANDRUM
PUGALUR
KAYATHAR
KARAIKUDI
CUDDALORE
SOUTH CHENNAI
KRISHNAPATNAM
CHITTOOR
VIJAYAWADA
SINGARPET
PIPAVAV
LIMBDI
KISHENPUR
DULHASTI
WAGOORA
MOGA
URI
BHUTAN
RAMAGUNDAM
SATLUJRAVI
JULLANDHAR
DESH
NAGAR
VARANASI
/UNNAO
M'BAD
PURNEA
KORBA
NAGDA
SILIGURI/BIRPARA
PHASE - III
TEHRI
MEERUT
BHIWADI
BINA SATNA
MALANPURSHIROHI
KAWAS
AMRAVATI
AKOLA
(By 2012)
AGRA
SIRSI
CHAL
JETPURAMRELI
BOISARTARAPUR
PADGHE
DHABOL
KOYNA
/BARH
G'PUR
HOSUR
NeedNeed forfor NationalNational GridGrid• Uneven disposition of energy resources
Major Hydro resources in NER & NRCoal reserves mostly in Bihar/Orissa/West Bengal
Cost of power transmission (1.11 cents/kwh) lower than cost of fuel transportation (3.33 cents/kwh).
• Some Regions are no longer Self-sufficient
Major resources in SR exhausted In NR, mainly hydro resources having long gestation period
• Unbalanced Growth of different Regions
Some regions are surplus and some are deficit.
• Optimisation of generation capacity additionUtilising time diversitySpinning reserve optimisation
Development of National Grid – Major Development of National Grid – Major ConsiderationsConsiderations
• Development in a phased manner – commensurate with
generation/ load growth
• Conservation of Right-of-Way - especially in areas with scarcity of
ROW ---- viz. area near hydro, chicken-neck area, forest area,
town etc.
In forest area with rich flora & fauna, construction of line with
high towers ---- no forest cutting required.
• Minimisation of transmission cost - immediate as well as long-term basis.
• Flexible enough to accommodate change in load-generation pattern.
Plan for National GridPlan for National Grid PHASE-I (By 2002):
Interconnection through HVDC Back-to-Back links-
North – West: 500MW Vindhyachal Back-to-Back Under
West – South: 1000MW Chandrapur Back-to-Back Opera-
East – South: 500MW Gazuwaka Back-to-Back tion East – North: 500MW Sasaram Back-to-Back – expected by
(AC line of this project in operation 2002
--- transferring 350 MW in radial mode)
With the completion of Sasaram HVDC Back-to-back link, framework of National Grid would be completed.
Plan for National GridPlan for National GridPHASE-II (By 2007):
• High capacity “Transmission highways” envisaged alongwith major generation projects-
East-South 2000 MW HVDC bipole between Talcher-Kolar - 2003.Augmentation of Gazuwaka HVDC back-to-back by 500MW - 2004. East – North High capacity 400 kV link from Tala to Delhi - 2004.2500 MW HVDC bipole between Hirma – Jaipur- 2005 East – West 400kV AC link between Rourkela and Raipur –2003400kV AC link between Hirma and Raipur & Sipat - 2005..
MAP
Plan for National GridPlan for National Grid
PHASE-III (By 2012):
Establishment of a ring of 765kV lines traversing across Northern, Western and Eastern Regions
Construction of various sections of Ring progressively along with major generation projects viz. Barh, Kahalgaon, North Karanpura etc.
Strengthening of East-South interconnection through another 2500MW bipole
MAP
National Grid: Cost-benefit analysisNational Grid: Cost-benefit analysisCost
Investment required Rs. 23,000 crores
Benefits
Reduction in capacity addition requirement by about 13750 MW--- hence saving on
investment of Rs. 55,000 crore. (due to peak time diversity and saving in spinning
reserve)
Transmission highway would enable setting up of large pit head stations having
lower cost of energy
Savings on account of this - Rs. 9000 crores per annum.
In addition, Nation’s investment towards fuel transportation infrastructure could be
avoided.
Better overall hydro-thermal mix
Very low for ER and WR ( ER – 15 : 85, WR - 17 : 83 ) – affecting grid
operation
With National Grid, it would become 33 : 67 on all India basis. .