Sandro Bologna - ENEA [email protected] progettoreti.enea.it Workshop – AICT
ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico...
-
Upload
melanie-jacobs -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico...
ALMA MATER STUDIORUMUNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
RESPONSE
PREDICTORS TO
TARGETED THERAPIES
Stefano Fanti
DIAGNOSTICS
THERAPY
PET AND THERAPY
Accurate staging Correct therapeutic choice
Correct prognosis definition (DFS, OS)
End treatment
Interim PET
More therapy?
Prognosis (DSF, OS)
Change in therapy?
Accurate staging
Definition of target volume
Response to therapy
Th response
RT planning
• CR: disappearence of all target lesions confirmed at > 4 weeks
• PR: > 30% decrease from baseline confirmed at > 4 weeks
• PD: > 20% increase from baseline or appearance of new lesions
• SD: neither PR or PD
RECIST Critera for the evaluation of response to treatment in solid tumors with Conventional Imaging :
RECIST CRITERIA
An appropriate evaluation is possible only after 4 weeks; an early
evaluation is often difficult or not possible
Anatomical post therapy changes (fibrosis etc ) can lead to over
estimate the presence of disease. On the other hand a consistent
reduction in size, do not exclude the persistence of disease, so it is
possible to under estimate the presence of residual disease.
New anti-angiogenetic agents are cytostatic and not necessarily
cytotoxic: a reduction in the size of tumor is not to be expected when
these agents are employed.
Interobserver variability
Limitation of RECIST and WHO criteria in the evaluation of response to chemo and radiation therapy in solid tumors.
S. J. Gwyther: Current standards for response evaluation by imaging techniques EJNM 6/2006
In oncology mass dimension may mean nothing.
Mass dimensions change over a long time after therapy.
Especially after therapy, a big mass can be fibrotic, a small mass can be active cancer.
MASS AND METABOLISM: FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE TO THERAPY
EORTC CRITERIA
• CR: same metabolic rate as normal tissue
• PR: after I cycle 15-25% decrease in SUV after II cycle > 25% decrease in SUV
• PD: > 25% increase of SUV or apparence of new lesions
• SD: difference of –15% to +25% in SUV; same extension
SUV
Main advantages of SUV in the measurements of glucose metabolism
• Requires only a single scan 60 minutes after i.v. injection of FDG• No blood sampling• Fast and easy to calculate
HD
FDG PET and CT
CRPET TN
PRPET TP
PRPET FN ?
Potential pitfalls (FP or FN) of FDG PET in the evaluation of response to therapy in solid tumors or lymphoma.
PRPET FP?
Limitation of metabolic response assessment criteria in the evaluation of response to chemo and radiation therapy in solid tumors.
end points:
• evaluate the efficacy of the current treatment.
• switch to more aggressive therapies in case of NON response
• reduce toxicity in case of early metabolic CR
• correlate with DFS and OS.
END TREATMENT EVALUATION
EARLY RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
HD PATIENT STUDIED BEFORE AND AFTER 2 CYCLES OF CHT: COMPLETE RESPONSE
STAGING BEFORE CHT
AFTER 2 CYCLESOF ABVD
Spaepen, BJ Haemat.2001
End Therapy PET has high VPP e VPN correlates with OS
HD
•F, 32 yo•May 2004: Biopsy HD, classical•June 2004: FDG PET staging IIIB, Bulky mediastinum CT total body: same as PET 28/06/2004: CT (6 cycles ABVD)
June 2004. FDG PET Staging. MIP
HD
After del II cycle early evaluation•PET: residual disease.
Ago 2004June 2004
HD
After VI cycle CT•CT: reduction of 75% of lymph nodes involvemet (RECIST:CR)•PET: PD (increased uptake).
Dec 2004Ago 2004
HD
High doses CTSept 2005: RT on residual disease PET PD
Dec 2004 Dec 2005
Kostakoglu L. et al.
After 1 cycle: high PPV and NPV
•Rectal •Lung •Oesophageal•Breast•Head and neck•Pancreas•Ovarian•Soft tissue •Sarcomas •Cervix•Gastric•GIST
Solid tumors
PET: Early response assessment
Lymphoma
(SUVmax 11.2) (SUVmax < 2)
AMstaging•Plurifocal breast lesions•N+ M+ (sternum)
•Pathologic remission 90%
SUV 9.5 (staging) 8-04
SUV 5.4 2-12.04 SUV 4.1 31-12-2004
MS•operata il 18.1.2005
• remissione < 30% grado 2
MS•operata il 18.1.2005
•remissione < 30%
grado 2
•3/39 linfonodi positivi (con risposta grado C sui linfonodi)
SUV 4.1 31-12-2004 SUV 7.0 14-1-2005
•PV operata il 21.2.2005:
• remissione < 90% (grado 3)
• 31/32 linfonodi positivi (risposta sui linfonodi grado C): PET falsa negativa fare linf. Sentinella!
11-04 staging SUVmax 8.0 12-04 SUVmax 5.1 3-2-05 SUVmax < 2.0
ResultsTiming
Average % Reduction of SUV (Ovary)
48%
60%
73%79% 80% 80%
35%
54%62%
70% 72% 70%
28%
39%
26%
43%49% 49%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
After 1st After 2nd After 3rd After 4th After 5th After 6th
Cycles of CHT
Av
era
ge
% S
UV
Red
uct
ion
Responders All patients NON responders
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5366-72.
BREAST CANCER
11-04 12-04 2-05 2-05
SUVmax< 2.0SUVmax 6.7SUVmax 8.7SUVmax > 20
31.3.2005 Staging SUV > 20 21.4.2005 SUV < 3.0
OVARIAN CANCER
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7445-53
•Rectal •Lung •Breast•Head and neck•Pancreas•Renal•Gastric•GIST
Solid tumors
PET: response assessment to targeted therapies
GASTRIC CANCER: Folcetux before and after (40 days)COMPLETE RESPONSE
GASTRIC CANCER: Folcetux before and after (43 days)STABLE DISEASE
GASTRIC CANCER: Folcetux before and after (35 days)PARTIAL RESPONSE
18F-TYR
18F-FMT
18F-FET
18F-DOPA
18F-OCT
18F-TOCA
18F-FLT
18F-FBAU
18F-FMAU
18F-FAU
18F-FEC
18F-FBM
18F-FCH
18F-FPC
18F-MEC
18F-FES
18F-FMOX
18F-FESD
18F-FENP
18F-FMNP
18F-FDHT
18F-FMIB
18F-MEC
18F-MDH
18F-MISO
18F-FAZA
18F-FETN
18F-FETA
18F-EF1
18F-EF5
18F-NaF
18F-FU
18F-FAMP
18F-FHPG
18F-FHBG
18F-FIAU
18F-FPCV
18F-RGD
18F-TP
18F-FMAC
18F-FAMP
18F-SFB 18F-FBG
•Rectal •Lung •Oesophageal•Breast•Head and neck•Pancreas•Ovarian•Soft tissue •Sarcomas •Prostate•Gastric•GIST
Solid tumors
PET: Early response assessment non FDG
FDG PRE FDG POST
SUVmax 5.5 SUVmax 4.5
SARCOMA: Before and after radiotherapyRESPONSE ?
MET POSTMET PRE
SUVmax 16.9 SUVmax 4.2
90Y-DOTA-TATE
end points:
• predict the efficacy of the current treatment.
• switch to different therapies
• reduce cost and toxicity
END TREATMENT EVALUATION
EARLY RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE
SMALL ANIMAL PET
1. Spatial Resolution
2. Depth
3. Temporal Resolution
4. Sensitivity
5. Molecular Probe detection (ng)
Metabolic tracers:• 18F-FDG• 11C-Choline• 11C-Methionine• 18F-DOPA• 18F-FLT• 18F• 11C-Acetate• 124I
Receptorial ligands:• Integrins• Annexins• EGF• Somatostatin• Cannabinoid SR141716 • Adenosine: C11- KF21213: ligand
CNS adenosine A(2A) receptors• Dopamine: F-DOPA • Androgens• Estrogens
Reporter probes 18F-FHBG….
Tracers for hypoxia (…nitroreductase):• 18F-MISO• 18F-FETA• 18F-FAZA
IN VIVO MONITORING TUMOR DEVELOPING (MODELLING)
RMS xenograft murine model treated with anti-MYCN PNA
TBR SCAN BY SCAN PNA TREATED VS UNTREATED
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
SCANS
TB
R CONTROLSCASES
CONTROLS 1,73 1,69 1,96 2,42
CASES 1,67 1,11 1,13 1,17
1 2 3 4
d 2 d 20
P=0.018
No.10No. 7
RMS XENOGRAFT MURINE MODEL TREATED WITH A NEW MOLECULE
UNTREATED
UNTREATED
TREATEDTREATED
NEW RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
1. Commonly used compounds are sensitive but not specific for the disease under evaluation (18F-FDG, 11C-Choline, 11C-Methionine….).
2. They highlight hypermetabolic processes (tumors, inflammation, granoulomatous diseases….) over a background.
3. Aim: to develop radiopharmaceuticals specific for the disease under evaluation, for a specific metabolic feature or labeling a therapeutic molecule to assess its distribution inside the tumor.
NEW RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
To develop radiopharmaceuticals specific for the therapeutic mechanism under evaluation, for a specific receptor or another feature of the drug in order to predict its efficacy.
68Ga-DOTA-NOC
Staging of NET, CI shows several liver lesions, PET identified primary tumour
EGFR: receptor involved in cancer growth. The tumor epitelium is dependent from EGFR as well.
Radiolabeled EGFR ligand can be useful to detect tumor site and to predict response to a specific therapy.
EGF: reversible or irreversible
ligand.
NEW RADIO-PHARMACEUTICALS
U87 tumour (EGFR pos), 124I-X uptake 4h
+ =
U87 tumour (EGFR pos), 18F-X
UPTAKE 5 MIN
UPTAKE 60 MIN
UPTAKE 150 MINBIODISTRIBUTI
ON UPTAKE 60 MIN
PET AND THERAPY
End treatmentMore therapy ?
Prognosis
Therapy response
Interim PETChange therapy ?
Prognosis
Before treatmentTherapy ?
Prognosis
THANK YOU