Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

60
15 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/F Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and Revenues Chapter 15

Transcript of Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

Page 1: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 1©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocation of Support DepartmentCosts, Common Costs, and

RevenuesChapter 15

Page 2: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 2©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 1

Differentiate the single-ratefrom the dual-rate

cost-allocation method.

Page 3: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 3©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Single-Rate andDual-Rate Methods

The single-rate cost allocation methodpools together all costs in a cost pool.The dual-rate cost allocation methodclassifies costs in each cost pool intotwo cost pools – a variable-cost cost

pool and a fixed-cost cost pool.

Page 4: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 4©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 2

Understand how the uncertaintyuser managers face is affected

by the choice between budgetedand actual cost-allocation rates.

Page 5: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 5©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus Actual Rates

Budgeted rates let the user department know inadvance the cost rates they will be charged.

During the budget period, the supplier department,not the user departments, bears the risk of any

unfavorable cost variances.

Why?

Page 6: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 6©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus Actual Rates

– because the user departments do not pay forany costs that exceed the budgeted rates

When actual rates are used for cost allocation,managers do not know the rates to be used

until the end of the budget period.

Page 7: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 7©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Budgeted versus ActualUsage Allocation Bases

Organizations commit to infrastructure costs onthe basis of a long-run planning horizon.

The use of budgeted usage to allocate these fixedcosts is consistent with the long-run horizon.

Page 8: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 8©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 3

Allocate support department costsusing the direct, step-down,

and reciprocal methods.

Page 9: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 9©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

An operating department (a productiondepartment in manufacturing companies)

adds value to a product or service.A support department (service department)

provides the services that assist other operatingand support departments in the organization.

Page 10: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 10©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

Direct method:Allocates support department costs to operating

departments only.Step-down (sequential allocation) method:

Allocates support department costs to other supportdepartments and to operating departments.

Reciprocal allocation method:Allocates costs by services provided among all

support departments.

Page 11: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 11©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

The Canton Division of Smith Corporation has twooperating departments and two support departments.

Assemblyand

Finishing

Maintenanceand

Human Resources

Page 12: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 12©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

Total square feet = 255,000Total number of employees = 95

Maintenance is allocated using square feet.Human Resources is allocated using

number of employees.

Page 13: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 13©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

Human Maintenance Resources Budgeted costs before allocations: $300,000 $2,160,000 Square feet: 5,000 30,000 Number of employees: 8 15

Page 14: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 14©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating SupportDepartments Costs

Assembly Finishing Budgeted costs before allocations: $1,700,000$900,000 Square feet: 110,000 110,000 Number of employees: 48 24

Page 15: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 15©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct MethodSupport Departments Operating Departments

$1,700,000Assembly

$900,000Finishing

110/220

48/72

24/72

0% 0% 110/220

Maintenance$300,000

HumanResources$2,160,000

Page 16: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 16©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct MethodSupport Departments Operating Departments

$1,700,000Assembly

$900,000Finishing

$150,000

$1,440,000

$720,000

0% 0% $150,000

Maintenance$300,000

HumanResources$2,160,000

Page 17: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 17©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Direct Method

Assembly FinishingOriginal costs: $1,700,000$ 900,000Maintenance Allocated: 150,000 150,000Human Resources Allocated: 1,440,000 720,000Total $3,290,000$1,770,000

Page 18: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 18©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Which support department should be allocated first?Maintenance provides 12% of its services

to Human Resources.Human Resources provides 10% of its

services to Maintenance.Maintenance to Human Resources:

30,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 12%) × $300,000 = $36,000

Page 19: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 19©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Maintenance to Assembly:110,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 44%) × $300,000 = $132,000

Maintenance to Finishing:110,000 ÷ 250,000 (or 44%) × $300,000 = $132,000

Page 20: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 20©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Costs before Allocated allocation costs

Maintenance: $ 300,000 ($300,000)Human Resources:$2,160,000$ 36,000Assembly: $1,700,000$132,000Finishing: $ 900,000$132,000

Page 21: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 21©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Human Resources costs to be allocated become$2,160,000 + $36,000 = $2,196,000.

Human Resources to Assembly:48 ÷ 72 × $2,196,000 = $1,464,000

Human Resources to Finishing:24 ÷ 72 × $2,196,000 = $732,000

Page 22: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 22©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Costs before AllocatedAllocated allocation costscosts

HumanResources: $2,160,000 $ 36,000 ($2,196,000)Assembly: $1,700,000 $132,000 $ 1,464,000Finishing: $ 900,000 $132,000 $ 732,000

Page 23: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 23©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Step-Down Method

Total cost after allocation:Assembly Department:

$1,700,000 + $132,000 + $1,464,000 = $3,296,000Finishing Department:

$900,000 + $132,000 + $732,000 = $1,764,000

Page 24: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 24©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Reciprocal

M HR A FMaintenance – 12% 44% 44%Human Resources 10% – 60% 30%

Maintenance cost = $300,000 + .10PHuman Resource cost = $2,160,000 + .12M

Page 25: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 25©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Reciprocal

Maintenance cost (M)= $300,000 + .10($2,160,000 + .12M)

M = $300,000 + $216,000 + .012M.988M = $516,000 M = $522,267HR = $2,160,000 + .12($522,267)

HR = $2,160,000 + $62,672 = $2,222,672

Page 26: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 26©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Reciprocal

M HR A FBeforeallocation: $300,000 $2,160,000 $1,700,000 $ 900,000Allocation: (522,267) 62,672 229,797 229,797Allocation: 222,267 ($2,222,672) 1,333,603 666,802Total $3,263,400 $1,796,599

Total cost Assembly Department: $3,263,400Total cost Finishing Department: $1,796,599

Page 27: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 27©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overview of Methods

Overhead rate for the Assembly Department isdetermined using direct labor cost as a denominator.

Overhead rate for the Finishing Department isdetermined using machine-hours as the denominator.

Page 28: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 28©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Comparison of Methods

Assembly FinishingDirect labor cost: $698,880 $349,440Machine-hours: 24,000 23,500

What are the various overhead rates using the three methods?

Page 29: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 29©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead Rates Direct Method

Assembly:$3,290,000 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 471% of direct labor costsFinishing:

$1,770,000 ÷ 23,500 = $75.32 per machine-hour

Page 30: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 30©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead RatesStep-Down Method

Assembly:$3,296,000 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 472% of direct labor costFinishing:

$1,764,000 ÷ 23,500 = $75.06 per machine-hour

Page 31: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 31©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Overhead Rates Reciprocal

Assembly:$3,263,400 ÷ $698,880 direct labor costs

= 467% of direct labor costFinishing:

$1,796,599 ÷ 23,500 = $76.45 per machine-hour

Page 32: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 32©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Comparison of Rates

Assembly FinishingDirect method: 471% $75.32Step-down method: 472% $75.06Reciprocal method: 467% $76.45

Page 33: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 33©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 4

Allocate common costsusing either the stand-alone

or incremental method.

Page 34: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 34©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating Common Costs

Two methods for allocating common cost are:

1. Stand-alone costallocation method

2. Incremental costallocation method

Page 35: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 35©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone Example

A consultant in Tampa is planning to go toChicago and meet with an international client.

The round-trip Tampa/Chicago/Tampaairfare costs $540.

The consultant is also planning to attenda business meeting with a North Carolina

client in Durham.

Page 36: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 36©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone Example

The round-trip Tampa/Durham/Tampaairfare costs $360.

The consultant decides to combine the twotrips into a Tampa/Durham/Chicago/Tampa

itinerary that will cost $760.

Page 37: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 37©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone Example

How much should the consultant chargeto the North Carolina client?$360 ÷ ($360 + $540) = .40

.40 × $760 = $304

How much to the international client?$760 – $304 = $456

Page 38: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 38©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental Cost Example

Assume that the business meeting in Chicagois viewed as the primary party.

What would be the cost allocation?International client (primary) $540Durham client (incremental) $760 – $540 = $220

Page 39: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 39©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 5

Explain the importance ofexplicit agreement betweencontracting parties whenreimbursement is based

on costs incurred.

Page 40: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 40©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Cost Allocation and Contracts

Many commercial contracts include clauses thatrequire the use of cost accounting information.Contract disputes arise with some regularity,

often with respect to cost allocation.Cost assignment rules should be as explicit as

possible (and in writing).

Page 41: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 41©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 6

Understand how bundlingof products gives rise to

revenue-allocation issues.

Page 42: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 42©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenues and Bundled Products

A bundled product is a package of two or moreproducts (or services) sold for a single price.

Bundled product sales are also referred toas “suite sales.”

The individual components of the bundle alsomay be sold as separate items at their own

“stand-alone” prices.

Page 43: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 43©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenues and Bundled Products

What businesses provide bundled products?

Banks Hotels Tours Checking Safety deposit boxes Investment advisory

Lodging Food and beverage services Recreation

Transportation Lodging Guides

Page 44: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 44©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 7

Allocate the revenues ofa bundled package to

the individual productsin that package.

Page 45: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 45©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation Methods

English Languages Institute buys Englishlanguage software programs locally and

then sells them in Mexico and Central America.English sells the following programs:

Grammar, Translation, and CompositionThese programs are offered stand-alone

or in a bundle.

Page 46: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 46©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation Methods

Stand-alone PriceGrammar $255Translation $ 85Composition $185

Purchasing these softwareprograms costs English

the following:Grammar $180Translation $ 45Composition $ 95

Page 47: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 47©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation Methods

Bundle (Suites) PriceGrammar + Translation $290Grammar + Composition $350Grammar + Translation + Composition $410

Page 48: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 48©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Revenue Allocation Methods

The two main revenue allocation methods are:

1. The stand-alonemethod

2. The incrementalmethod

Page 49: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 49©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

There are four types of weights for thestand-alone revenue allocation method.

1. Selling prices 2. Unit costs

3. Physical units 4. Stand-aloneproduct revenues

Page 50: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 50©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Consider the Grammar and Translationsuite, which sells for $290 per day.How much weight should English

Languages Institute assign to each item?

Page 51: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 51©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Selling prices:The individual selling prices are $255 for

Grammar and $85 for Translation.Grammar:

$255 ÷ $340 = 0.75, $290 × 0.75 = $217.50Translation:

$85 ÷ $340 = 0.25, $290 × 0.25 = $72.50

Page 52: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 52©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Unit costs:This method uses the costs of the individual

products to determine the weights for therevenue allocations.

Grammar:$180 ÷ $225 = 0.80, $290 × 0.80 = $232

Translation:$45 ÷ $225 = 0.20, $290 × 0.20 = $58

Page 53: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 53©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Physical units:This method gives each product unit in the

suite the same weight when allocatingsuite revenue to individual products.With two products in the suite, each

product is allocated 50% of suite revenues.1 ÷ (1 + 1) = 0.50

$290 × 0.50 = $145

Page 54: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 54©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Stand-alone product revenues:This method captures the quantity of eachproduct sold as well as their selling prices.

Assume that the stand-alone revenues in 2003are Grammar $734,400, Translation $81,600,

and Composition $133,200.What are the weights for the Grammar

and Translation suite?

Page 55: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 55©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Grammar:$734,400 ÷ $816,000 = 0.90, $290 × 0.90 = $261

Translation:$81,600 ÷ $816,000 = 0.10, $290 × 0.10 = $29

Page 56: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 56©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Stand-Alone RevenueAllocation Method

Revenue Allocation Weights Grammar Translation

Selling prices $217.50 $ 72.50Unit costs 232.00 58.00Physical units 145.00 145.00Stand-alone product revenues 261.00 29.00

Page 57: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 57©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

The first-ranked product is termed theprimary product in the bundle.

The second-ranked product is termedthe first incremental product.

The third-ranked product is the secondincremental product, and so on.

Page 58: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 58©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Assume that Grammar is designatedas the primary product.

If the suite selling price exceeds the stand-alone price of the primary product, the

primary product is allocated 100%of its stand-alone revenue.

Page 59: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 59©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Incremental RevenueAllocation Method

Grammar and Translation suite selling price= $290 per day

Allocated to Grammar: $255Remaining to be allocated: ($290 – $255) = $35

Allocated to Translation: $35

Page 60: Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and ...

15 - 60©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

End of Chapter 15