Allen Duncan Curtis Grens Kenny Haulk Chris Lambrecht Nassisa-Geda Techane
description
Transcript of Allen Duncan Curtis Grens Kenny Haulk Chris Lambrecht Nassisa-Geda Techane
Allen DuncanCurtis GrensKenny Haulk
Chris LambrechtNassisa-Geda Techane
April 24, 2003
2
Group Management - Overview
Group LeaderChris Lambrecht
Writing/Editing Reports
Nassisa-Geda Techane
Schematic/PCB Layout Design
Kenny Haulk
Budget/Vendor Relations
Allen Duncan
Assembly/TestingCurtis Grens
3
Overall Progress
• Devised Effective Group Management Plan
• Researched & Selected Necessary Components
• Prepared Comprehensive Optical Link Budget
• Designed Schematics and PCB Layout for Gigabit Ethernet TX/RX
• Assembled and Tested
• Analyzed & Debugged Variety of Problems with Transceiver
• Satisfied IEEE 802.3z Standards
• Evaluated Performance Characteristics, e.g., Alignment Tolerance
• Stayed Within Research/Development Budget of $350
4
Testing•Baseline Testing
•Attenuation Testing
•5 dB
•10 dB
•Alignment Tolerance
5
Baseline Transceiver Tests• Initial Results:
Baseline Tx Results Baseline Rx Results
• Observations– No Problems with Baseline Testing
6
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation• Initial Results:
5 dB Rx Results with Tx “On”5 dB Rx Results with Tx “off”
7
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation
• Observations– Rx gives better eye when Tx is “on”
– Rx with Tx on is better but still poor
• Hypotheses – Possible reasons why results differ when Tx is on
• Crosstalk
– Possible causes to Rx degradation• Crosstalk
• Poor PD characteristics
• Poor connections
8
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation
• Discovering the Problem– Test Simultaneous Operation
w/ RX Input Disconnected• Result: Bit-Pattern Present
• Conclusion: Crosstalk Evident
9
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation• Determining the Problem
– Checked all connections• Result: Found Atten. Were not firmly connected
• Analysis: Eyes were cleared up considerably
Firm Connect, Tx Off Firm Connect, Tx On
10
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation• Additional Problems
– With Tx on, eye-diagram is still cloudy• Crosstalk still a problem
– Possible Solution: Shielding
11
X-Talk experiments: Shielding• Shielding between entire TX and RX
Aluminum Shield Setup between TX and RX
12
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation• Shielding
– Significant improvement in shielding Tx and Rx
Tx on, no shielding Tx on, shielded
13
Receiver Sensitivity – Attenuation• Conclusion
– EMI caused significant degradation of signal with 5 dB or more attenuation
• Improved with shielding
– Connectors must have secure connections• Firm connection resulted in a receiver eye
– Crosstalk can be very misleading!
14
Performance Characteristics – Alignment Tolerance
• Region where we get acceptable results is basically circular
• Although, we may have estimated the center wrong
• Able to get a good eye, at center, up to 820um away
15
Rx Sensitivity – Alignment Tolerance
Alignment Tolerance (z=0)
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
y-alignment
x-a
lig
nm
en
t
16
Important Details:
IEC Eye-Safe Optical Power Output Limit: 1 mW
Typical Optical Power Output of GDS1250: 0.364 mW
5 dB Attenuation from GDS1250 TX:
17
Wrap-Up
• Basic Functionality Confirmed
• Probably Complies with IEEE 802.3x Standards
• Room To Improve Performance w/ Better Shielding and/or Improved Layout
• Overall, A Working Gigabit Optoelectronic Link