ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
-
Upload
juliana-elisa-raffaghelli -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
1/10
Advanced Training Course
Adults Learning for Intergenerational
Creative Experiences
This training course is delivered in the contextof LLP Project GRUNDTVIG-ALICE
Grant Agreement number :2011-3375/ 001-001
Project Number: 518106-LLP-1-2011-1-IT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP
University Ca Foscari of Venice - Technical University of Crete -
Romanian Society for Lifelong Learning SEED The Mosaic Art
and Sound - Fondazione Nazionale Carlo Collodi
2012-2013
Training of Trainers
Advanced Training
Course
Training of Trainers: Course Presentation and Strategy
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
2/10
Course Presentation
2
Training of TrainersCourse Presentation and Strategy
Advanced Training Course
Adults Learning for IntergenerationalCreative Experiences
Training Coordination University Ca Foscari of Venice
Cover graphic design SEED
Authors: Juli ana Raffaghell i Umberto Margiott a
This publication is produced wi th the financial support fr om the European Community in
the frames of LLP, sectoral program Grundtvig , Grant Agreemen Grant Agreement number
:2011-3375/ 001-001
The publication reflects the views only of its author s, and the European Commission
cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained
herein.
The author s of the Module are not responsible for the content of the websites li sted as resources in this handbook. The content of t hese
pages may change over t ime and is the sole responsibil it y of their authors
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
3/10
Course Presentation
3
1- Introduction
In the complex contemporary European society, social cohesion needs to be built on the
basis of a new integrated and complex dimension of the social tissue, where diversity (among
cultures, age, gender) is considered an opportunity. Intergenerational learning (IL) bring to
the fore the question of differences that enrich: in fact, IL can be a twofold purpose process,
that improves dialogue among generations through civic participation in common social and
institutional spaces, while at the same time enacts processes of informal learning towards the
achievement, both by adults and children, of key competences for lifelong learning. IL is
hence, a mean and an end to foster social cohesion.Nevertheless, ensuring IL, through the creation of adequate educational environments is a
challenge both for researchers and practitioners. From one hand formal education promotes
mainly intra-generational experiences, structured in contexts of learning were few or none
contact among generations (beyond the technical role of teachers/educators) occur (Loewen,
1996; Miller et al. 2008). From the other hand, intergenerational learning also implies
configuring adults adequate learning settings (Newman, 2008). More research is clearly
needed in this field: in spite of the relevance given nowadays to the lifelong learning
perspective, adults informal learning, as more frequent learning situations for adults of low
educational attainments, is not sufficiently explored, characterized and modelled. This
research focus should accompany modernisation of Higher Education, as well as recognition
of professional learning, achieved through working situations; the lack of attention to this issue
could end in lack of participation to the lifelong learning perspective of an important part of the
adult population, as it is emphasized by ET2020 indicators and strategy.
In line with the above mentioned research problem, this training course project aims at
introducing a perspective on the issue of adults educators needs of qualification, through a
case study, namely, the European training of trainers strategy within the GRUNDTVIG LLP
PROJECT ALICE Adults Learning for Intergenerational Creative Experiences. The training
strategy is envisaged as a device to promote innovations regarding adults learning,
particularly those excluded from formal training because of their social condition. The projects
leading hypothesis is that generations speak different languages; as it happens in
multilingual, intercultural contexts, the only way to create common spaces of interaction is to
generate divergent, stimulating situations, where the individual (particularly adults) goes out
from the own resources and processes of meaning, to play with new meanings in the
relationship with the kid. Therefore, learning situations should lead adults to reflect on the
own role as educators, and hence, to become early promoters of a lifelong learning strategy .
Informal activities, in the project, foreseen the adoption of creative languages (art,
storytelling, social media) as a mean to generate rich and caring environments for kids;
moreover, in the process of interacting through creative languages the differences between
adults and children are mediated, with impact in both children and adults achievements
regarding key competences 1 , 4, 5, 7 and 8 (COM2006/962/EC ).
Consequently, adults trainers must be able of understanding the value of informal learningsituations, developing skills to promote events with strategic impact on key competences. It is
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
4/10
Course Presentation
4
not enough to promote cultural events: trainers, as scaffolders of generational dialogue are
called to be aware of the educational impacts of their informal activities as a way to engage
adults that are normally far from formal (University, Further training) and/or non-formal
(training on the job) in lifelong learning trajectories.
2- The problem of buildingcaring environments and the role of Adults asEducators
Early childhood education (ECEC) and care as well as later children support with schooling
system, should go in parallel to adult education. In fact, adults are not only caregivers, but also
educators whose actions are plenty of consequences for the schooling system as well asfuture life, and lifelong learning decisions of the growing children. These assumptions emerge
both from research and European policy priorities for EU strategic goals 2020. ECEC in
Europe has been linked to efficiency and equity in education (Eurydice, 2009) being the mean
towards socio-cultural inclusion and prevention of schools' drop-out. This is so not only
because pre-primary education facilitates later learning, but also because a substantial body of
evidence shows that, especially for disadvantaged children, it can produce large socio-
economic returns. For this reason, the Commission has identified pre-primary education as a
priority theme for cooperation between Member States in 2009-10, in particular to promote
generalised equitable access - COM (2008) 865 -. It is also to be highlighted that in most
European countries (op.cit) there's a common conceptual division between care and educationfunction, emphasizing the role of formal education, and showing less concern on other forms
of education, seen as private. As it is possible to see, the adult plays an important role as
bridge among between informal and formal learning in childhood, through early caregiving,
as informal educational function that supports the children lifelong learning perspective. For
example, the EURYDICE 2009 report on Integrating Immigrant Children into School Schools
in Europe, point out that communication among school and parents, becomes crucial in
supporting effective children engagement in school activities; very often the school has to
tackle both the problem of integrating at risk kids and educating adults to understand their
children's learning/social problem within the school. This vision is consistent with the
importance of adult learning policy priorities in Europe -LLP 2011- where adults education
approaches that emphasizes senior volunteering, senior citizen education and improvement of
skills through family learning, are a key for a more inclusive society. In fact, as highlighted by
European Councils of Stockholm (2001) and Barcelona (2002) Europe will pass through a
demographical challenge in the upcoming decades, and the Commission wishes to turn this
key issue into an opportunity, COM(2006) 571. The Green Paper Confronting demographic
change: a new solidarity between the generations and the Commission's working document
on ageing society [SEC(2008) 2911] as well as EU2020 and OMS recommendations, are all
aimed to promote a social model that interweaves citizenship education and intergenerational
learning, as commitment that strengthens the social and affective relation among senior
citizens as volunteers and children. This entails a culture of awareness on rights and needs
throughout life. Memory and recent history, and learning on social/technological innovations,
are two faces of a same coin of reciprocity and learning to improve quality of life. With the
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
5/10
Course Presentation
5
2011 as Volunteers year and 2012 to be the European Year for Active Ageing , the context of
action is complete.
2.1. Why Creative Languages (CL)?
As stated before, intergenerational learning is an uncommon situation, that requires
pedagogical innovation and crossing boundariesof practice (both personal and institutional).
The key point is: how can we ensure IL? Which environments and languages better promote
connections between generations? Creative languages, going beyond languages traditionally
adopted in educational settings, could be an answer.
The role of arts education in forming the competences for young people for life in the 21st
century has been widely recognised at the European level. (Jan Figel, 2009, year of Creativity
and Innovation in Europe); in adult education, art (from themed film and art to literary
evenings, graffiti and performative social media like blogs or videorepositories with own
texts/images) and games are used as focal point, as events/situations/objects that promote
emotional engagement together with reflection on life values, relationships, identity. The kernelof effectiveness is the creative process, where emotional intelligence together with divergent
cognitive processes are enacted. CL are hence powerful tools for facilitating dialogue with
otherness (in this case, children). The key issue is the opportunity provided by CL of being
together in non-traditional ways, sharing the creative activity with a feeling of play, exploring,
trying, expressing. Furthermore, all these activity are now naturally mediated by technologies;
in fact, theres an exponential development of accessibility and usability of the same via the
phenomenon of Web 2.0 and particularly of social media, that causes the adoption of these
new media for everyday life activities of searching for information, self-expression, social
connections and support, all these dimensions connected to informal learning and hence, to
the participation to lifelong learning pathways. As a consequence, the Creative Languages tobe adopted during the project are mediated by technologies to support new literaciesand
empower dialogue and expression.
3- A.L.I.C.E.s strategy:theoretical and methodological framework
The ALICE project aims to work with parents, grandparents, volunteers and other adults
interested to interact with children through new spaces of edutainment, to support them in
discovering the importance of creative languages (art, storytelling and games) to build
intergenerational understanding. It is considered that this learning process provide adults with
competences to spend quality time with children, playing, telling and building stories through
the use of several artistic languages, and with the help of digital technological tools. Adults will
develop specific experience to better interact with children; whereas these last will benefit of
better support in early informal learning processes. Specifically, parents (particularly
immigrated adults) could benefit from being engaged in the social support networks enacted
by the project, developing specific competences (i.e., digital literacy, parental role in thecomplex society, etc.), useful to reinforce social cohesion. Adults coming from institutions and
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
6/10
Course Presentation
6
particularly volunteers, will be provided with knowledge to give support to children in early
informal learning, acquiring also specific technical competences and reinforcing transversal
competences for lifelong learning (learning to learn, social and civic participation, digital
competence). At the end of the project, major visibility of adult learning institutions could be
improved, by dialoguing with schools and families throughout adult learning activities, as well
as adults participation into the learning society.
This methodology, proposed by the project ALICE, is hypothesized to generate a third
space of learning, as zone of proximal development where intergenerational dialogue is
effectively practiced, configuring a transversal, social dimension of key competences.
3.1. Scaffolders of generational diversity : Building an Zone ofProximal Development for Intergenerational Learning
In the context of this project, a theoretical perspective will be adopted in order to
characterize learning design, as the development of educational environments and tools for
adults learning. This perspective should be transmitted to trainers, in order to give them a
framework of practice and reflection.
We could define intergenerational dialogue as a process of contact with otherness
(generational differences constituting strong cultural and social diversity), that creates a
conflict among participants. Adults values and beliefs are already consolidated though the
cultural context they developed in, as individuals. Instead, kids values and beliefs are being
formed through ongoing interactions, and the own need of being protagonists of change for
their own cultural contexts of life, as human need of expression.
For this intergenerational learning can have place, in a socio-constructivist approach, it
seems necessary to adopt symbolictoolsthat work as meansfor interaction and dialogue, as
the base of satisfactory exchanges that fulfill both children and adults needs, through a jointprocess of meaning making, of exploring and building new worlds.
To understand this perspective, we can bring James Wertschs words:
Instead of acting in a direct, unmediated way in the social and physical world,
our contact with the world is indirect or mediated by signs ()Vygotskij
harnessed a developmental, or genetic, method when analyzing mediation
(). From this perspective, the inclusion of signs into human action does not
simply lead to quantitative improvements in terms of speed or efficiency.
Instead the focus is on how the inclusion of tools and signs leads to qualitativetransformation(Wertsch, 2007:179)
From this point of view, Creative Languages as tools, mediate intergenerational
communication, leading to more than adaptive learning from children; in fact, it should
conduct to creative and transformative processes were adult and childrens developmental
perspectives are promoted, together with the construction of joint spaces of expression. To
complete this idea, we should now introduce the notion of agency, as emerging concept in
Vygotskijs developmental psychology, that indicates the need of expression of the self,
through participation into the culture with productivity and transformation (Holland &
Lachicotte, 2007; Sannino & Sutter, 2011). The adults need of agency, is represented aswillingness of transmitting their own values and beliefs to the next generation, to shape the
future giving continuity to the self; but this can enter in conflict with childrens agency as need
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
7/10
Course Presentation
7
of expressing the own creativity and identity- into the culture. Therefore, intergenerational
learning is not immediate, even when theres strong interdependence between the children
need of care- and the adult caregiver. To this regard, in a dialogical perspective, the adult
must be supported in understanding his/her own identity as caregiver and educator,
completing others self. Becoming aware of this implies a first important achievement in the
sense that consolidates a part of the adults awareness on her/his own autobiography as child
and younger (Demetrio, 2000; Cerchiaro&Zambianchi,2011) open to be modeled by the
relation with the children/younger. Inspiring on the Vygotskian legacy, adults trainers should
be prepared to configure spaces of learning through an interventionist methodology(Sannino
& Sutter, 2011): this implies generating educational settings as experimental situations where
tools enabling exchanges are adopted, ending in adults reflections on their role as educators
and competences achieved to support children. An activity that entails, in the end, trainers
reflection.
3.2. The projects training: an integrated, European networked
learning approach
In order to implement the above described approach, training of adults' trainers is
envisaged as a necessary step among partners. In fact, training is envisaged as a device to
promote the implementation of pedagogical innovations for adults learning. This pedagogical
device is represented by the following key elements:
A space for reflection on intergenerational learning and the problems of the intergenerationaldialogue within the own cultural context as well as toward an European context
Development of specific knowledge and competences achievement to lead intergenerationallearning processes through the introduction of Creative Languages, that are expression ofprojects partners expert knowledge:
Art and Adults' creative interactions with Children Children's Literature and metaphors to enact intergenerational dialogue
Digital Storytelling: intergenerational narratives
Games and social media to promote intergenerational learning
Development of competences for Learning Design and implementation into the LocalCommunities: Producing Adult Learning Pilot programmes.
Analyzing Adults informal Learning and participatory reflections on achieved competences.
The networked learning approach (through eLearning methodologies) help trainers to build
the own professional knowledge in a collaborative, transnational environment. Interactions with
content and experts of Creative Languages support the acquisition of competences necessary
to implement the pedagogical model; whereas support given at local level help trainers to
design specific adults learning events (as pilot programmes), as well as to implement a
participatory assessment of learning impacts that are part of the interventionist approach.
Consequently, trainers are conducted to understand the nature of mediation and the
innovation on the adults pedagogical approach as interventionist method, through a process
of transnational, networked learning. The transformational power of learning experiences is
hence expressed as part of the role of the trainer: his/her shared reflections on the several
contexts of practice highlight specificities and commonalities of an evolving professional
practice for the European Lifelong Learning strategy. Figure 1 introduces this training
structure.
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
8/10
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
9/10
Course Presentation
9
4- Towards the development of anew pedagogical framework
As it was emphasized by Knowles (Knowles, Holton & Swanson, 2005) pedagogicallearning and andragogical learning are different, considering the minimized role of the
educator in the latter. In fact, an adult will decide to participate in a learning environment only if
s/he feels that it is able of taking responsibility, if s/he understand the rationale of what is being
proposed, and if s/he consider that the issue is worth to spend energy and time, because it is
connected to a central part of the own life. Every adult can recognize the importance of
becoming a good educator; however, many adults consider that the own experience as
son/daughter, and children in general, is enough to accompany the own children learning
experiences. The research background introduced in this training course project shows that
there are many cases in which the own adult baggage of learning is not enough, and specific
training could be of crucial help. Furthermore, it was assumed that the valorization of adults as
educators could encompass a great potential for both adults and children key competences
achievements. However, adequate models and practices need to be implemented, as part of
educational innovations that make andragogicaland pedagogical learning to share a same
space of intervention.
This claims for new professional profiles as adults educators: the role exceeds that of a
teacher, trainer, educator or social animator. In fact, a new lifelong learning perspective will
require of new professional skills and knowledges, particularly regarding the issue of mediating
informal learning experiences where participants become aware of the own learning through
participatory processes. This applies specifically to the case of participation to lifelong learning
strategies, beyond formal and non-formal learning (in specialized institutions or on the job), of
adults that are in situations of poverty, social risk, immigrants. Therefore, the project, through
an interventionist method that builds on the socio-constructivist approach could bring new light
to the new skills and pedagogical innovations required to help at least the 15% of adults
participating to the lifelong learning, as it is the benchmark of the ET2020.
5- References
1. CERCHIARO,F.,ZAMBIANCHI,E. (2011) Ascolto e relazione educativa. Le azioni dell'OsservatorioRegionale Permanente del Veneto per prevenire il bullismo e il disagio scolastico. Padua:CLEUP.
2. DEMETRIO,D. (2000), Leducazione interiore. Introduzione alla pedagogia introspettiva. Milano:La Nuova Italia.
3. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2005) Green Training course "Confronting demographic change: a newsolidarity between the generations" retrive fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_situation/responses/e459227_it.pdf , 17September 2011
4. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2006) The demographic future of Europe from challenge toopportunity, COM(2006) 571 retrieved from http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0571:FIN:EN:PDF , 5 Dec 2011
-
8/2/2019 ALICE TT COURSE Presentation Strategy
10/10
Course Presentation
10
5. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2008) An updated strategic framework for European cooperation ineducation and training, COM 2008/865/EC retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0865:FIN:EN:PDF , 5 Dec 2011
6. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2008), COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DemographyReport 2008: Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society, retrieved fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=709&langId=en
7. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2006) Key competences for lifelonglearning, COM 2006/962/EC retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006H0962:EN:NOT , 5 Dec 2011
8. EURYDICE (2009) Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe: Tackling Social and CulturalInequalities Thematic Studies, Eurydice. Retrieved fromhttp://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/098EN.pdf , 4 Nov2011
9. HOLLAND,D.,LACHICOTTE,W. (2007) Vygotskij, Mead, and New Sociocultural Studies onIdentityin The Cambridge Companion to Vygotskij, edited by Daniels, H., Cole, M., Wertsch,J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. KNOWLES,M.;HOLTON,E.;SWANSON,R.A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic inadult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
11. LOEWEN,J (1996) Intergenerational Learning: What If Schools Were Places Where Adults andChildren Learned Together?, Research Report. Retrieved fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED404014.pdf , 5 Dec 2011
12. MILLER,R.,SHAPIRO,H.,HILDING HAMMAN,K.(2008), School's Over: Learning Spaces in Europein 2020: An Imagining Exercise on the Future of Learning , Report for the EuropeanCommission, Institute for Prospective technological studies, EUR 23532 EN 2008
13. NEWMAN,S.(2008), Intergenerational Learning and the Contributions of Older People, AgeingHorizons, Issue No. 8, 3139
14. SANNINO,A.,SUTTER,B.(2011), Cultural-historical activity theory and interventionist methdology:
Classical legacy and contemporary developments, Theory&Psychology21(5) 557-57015. WERTSCH,J. (2007) Mediationin The Cambridge Companion to Vygotskij, edited by
Daniels, H., Cole, M., Wertsch, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.