ALICE general results and upgrades

Click here to load reader

download ALICE general results and upgrades

of 48

description

ALICE general results and upgrades. Massimo Masera on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration University of Torino and I.N.F.N. - Italy [email protected]. LISHEP 2011 - Workshop on LHC – Present and Future 4,10 July 2011. Outline. The ALICE experiment Present detector performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ALICE general results and upgrades

First measurements of charged particle multiplicity in p-p collisions at the LHC with the ALICE experiment

Massimo Masera on behalf of the ALICE CollaborationUniversity of Torino and I.N.F.N. - Italy [email protected] general results and upgrades

LISHEP 2011 - Workshop on LHC Present and Future 4,10 July 2011Outline09/07/2011The ALICE experimentPresent detector performance Results from 2010 Pb-Pb run: Global event features Two particle correlation and flow Hard processes: heavy flavours and J/yThe future: plans for an upgrade of the ALICE detectorsConclusions

2LISHEP 2011I had to make choices: Pb-Pb results: pp only as a baseline Justa a (personal) selection of the available results

Heavy Ions at the LHC09/07/201132010Targets / nucleon pairTeV2.765.5Initial luminositycm-2 s-1310251027Number of colliding bunches137592Bunch spacingns50099.8*m3.50.5Transverse normalized emittancem31.5Ions per bunch1.21087107

LISHEP 2011ALICE: A Large Ion Collider Experiment Indeed ALICE has been designed to be the general purpose Heavy Ion experiment at the LHCALICE has also a physics programme for pp collisions, that are used as a reference for Pb-PbPbPb run: from Nov, 7 2010 30 daysCollected statistics: 3.75 b-1 (30 M hadronic m.b. interactions)09/07/20114

ALICE numbets: 1200 members100 institues30 CountriesLISHEP 201109/07/2011PLC 20J. Schukraft

Complete since 2008: ITS, TPC, TOF, HMPID,FMD, T0, V0, ZDC, Muon arm, Acorde PMD , DAQ

Partial installation (2010): 4/10 EMCAL* (approved 2009)7/18 TRD* (approved 2002)3/5 PHOS ~ 60% HLT (High Level Trigger)

2011 10/10 EMCAL10/18 TRD

*upgrade to the original setupITSTPCTRDTOFEMCALPHOSHMPIDL3 MagnetDetector statusLISHEP 20115Detector PerformanceTrackingVertexingPID09/07/20116LISHEP 2011

Tracking09/07/2011LISHEP 20117Tracking capabilities in the central barrel are crucial for most of the physics topics addressed in Pb-Pb collisionsTracking detectors: Inner Tracking System (ITS), Time Projection Chamber (TPC) and Transition Radiation Detector (TRD)Algorithm based on Kalman filter, with seeding in the TPC. ITS is used as a standalone tracker with leftover pointsHermetic detectors: very high efficiency for |h|5 GeV/cCharm RAA: comparison with p09/07/2011LISHEP 201131

Suppression for charm not too different w.r.t. that for pionsD mesons seem to be less suppressed for pT RAA pions: Energy loss for gluon > energy loss for quarks (Casimir factor) Energy loss of massless partons > energy loss of heavy quarks (dead cone effect)Heavy Flavours from m and e09/07/2011LISHEP 201132

Semileptonic decays of HF contribute to the electron and muon yields(Inclusive electron spectra) (cocktail of known sources) is dominated by HF for pT>3-4 GeV/cMuon yield is suppressed by a factor of ~3 for pT>6 GeV/c, where is dominated by Beauty RAA for muons and electrons are compatible within the large electron signal systematic uncertainties09/07/2011LISHEP 201133

Comparison with modelsLittle shadowing at medium-high pT (as predicted by EPS09 for cold nuclear matter) suppression is a hot matter effectLow pT rise: pPb data needed to understand itRadiative Eloss (BDMPS-ASW) D & muon lie on the same curveRadiative+collisional (WHDG @ 2.76 TeV)Fair descriptionLight-cone wave function approach with dissociation (Vitev)OK for muons (beauty)

J/ RAA: pp reference09/07/2011LISHEP 201134 3 days of data taking @ 2.76 TeVSample: 20.2 nb-1 (13.3 nb-1 used for the present analysis @ 7 TeV )J/y yield extracted from a fit to the invariant mass spectrum (crystal ball shape for the signal + double exponential for the background)Good agreement of differential cross sections with pQCD

J/ RAA: results09/07/2011LISHEP 201135

Contribution from B feed-down:~ 10% from p-p measurement (LHCb Coll., arXiv:1103.0423)Rough estimation assuming simple scaling with Ncoll: ~ 11% reduction of RAA0-80%

Inclusive J/ RAA0-80% = 0.49 0.03 (stat.) 0.11 (sys.) Bars: statistical errorsOpen rectangles: systematic errors dependent on centrality Filled rectangle: common systematics Suppression of ~0.5 Cold Nuclear Matter Effects not measured pPb data needed for thisJ/ RAA: comparison with RHIC09/07/2011LISHEP 201136ALICE data plotted as a function of J/y less suppressed at LHC (2.5